| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
The first three on the list work for me...
|
11-05-15 06:13pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
I'm wondering the outcome of what this poll would render had it included categorizing those very young, who're classified as Non-Nudes, all under age 18, and going the gamut yet carefully riding close to the limits allowed to break into this lucratively exciting business.
I suspect porn purveyors, good at getting in on this kind of approaching opportunity, are floundering in a tizzy of expectation at the mounting number of tender young things under the legal age that are progressively riding the cusp of definitive porn , giving it all to be getting a piece of the pie.
|
11-05-15 06:16pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - graymane :
I think that even the most vile porn producer would think twice and even three times before considering hiring anyone under the age of 18 to appear in a porn movie regardless that said person is remaining clothed and not involved in any sexual acts for no other reason than the 2257 regulation would paint him or her in a legal corner that they could not escape out of.
I can remember at least 2 to 3 cases in the last decade where it was found out rather quickly that a performer was underage at the time of her shoot and the feedback from almost everyone in the industry was to punish the producer who hired the performer.
|
11-05-15 06:45pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
pat362 (0)
|
Now in regards to the poll. I like them all and would feel cheated if I was limited to only a few possibilities.
|
11-05-15 06:46pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :
As always, the sheer fortune finding myself the benefactor of a reply from you resoundingly gets my attention. Unarguably PU's encyclopedia on Porn, it follows that anything Pat expounds upon covering the subject can be taken as irrefutable ......buck the guy and you're destine to come out of the fray subjectively depleted.
Having come out of this exchange as a much wiser man on this subject. I must, however, attempt to make my message clearer by conveying the 18 year old factor paramount in getting out my message ..... I think summing up the essence of my idea can be better discerned by relating my recent sojourn into browsing a number of indexed sites featuring girls seemingly doing it all who anyone would swear is nowhere near the age of 18.
True, the magical art of makeup can alter the looks of almost any girl. Such is the trickery developing that'll fool our brain receptors into almost anything porn-related you want to believe.
Winner and still champion ----- PU's indispensable professor covering our world of porn: So Give it up ,all, for PU's premier of porn ......."PAT" He'da man!
|
11-05-15 10:05pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - graymane :
Thanks for the praise. Now as to your recent post. I have noticed a strange trend in some recent and not so recent videos where the women are all at least 18 but could still easily pass for younger. This is especially obvious in lesbian porn where the double standard applies on a regular basis. The kind of stuff you see in lesbian porn could never happen in hetero porn today because there would be an uproar.
|
11-06-15 05:31pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
elephant (0)
|
No type other than good looking and no tats really, I'm a simple guy with simple tastes.
|
11-07-15 08:02am
Reply To Message
|
