Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit MetArt

MetArt (0)

Newbie
99*
mbaya (0) 12-13-15  08:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-PU discounted price of $19.99. This site is worth at least double that, considering the quantity and quality.
-First class customer service.
-Very complete tour of the site. You know exactly what you will get.
-Huge quantity of material gong back to 1998. You cannot download everything you might like in one 30 day subscription.
-Daily updates of about four to six photosets.
-Stunningly beautiful models. Hardly a disappointing one on the entire site. I did not see a single tattoo.
-Outstanding specs. Hi res photos recently come in at 5616x3744, videos at 1920x1080.
Cons: -Mostly Eastern European models, which results in close to zero ethnic variety.
-Mostly teens to twenties models and most are extremely thin. In some cases their rib cages and pelvic bones are quite visible. Despite their beautiful faces, many are not sexy.
-Little variety of body shapes.
-Too much emphasis on the art aspects of the female body. If I wanted art I would take a class or perhaps glance through Vogue. I like more explicit.
-Most sets seem to have no natural progression, such as stripping. The sets often have the model clothed in the last few photos. You could randomly mix up the order of the photos and they would be just as logical.
Bottom Line: It has been more than three years since I last joined Metart. In spite of some flaws, it is a great site for many objective reasons. The low price, as well as the quality of the content and the models makes this a site that should be ranked at the top of the nude photos category. Lk2fireone’s review says a lot that I totally agree with and he describes it very well.

I want to describe the subjective experience of being on the site. The layout and navigation are both logical and easy to use. The search engine is great. It is inviting, warm and friendly and it practically begs for you to get into checking out the content.I am referring to the old format here, as they just launched a Beta. I did not use it much yet, so I can't say much about it.

Once you are inside the site it is a lot like being in the jungle hunting for the good stuff which is camouflaged. I am not so much into art as I am into more explicit photos. There are some here, but it is hard to find them due to so much art. What you mostly see are side shots, legs crossed, jumping, use of props etc. Sometimes the photos are black and white, sometimes sepia, some with a soft focus, some with a low depth of field, where one part is in focus where other parts are not. Some sets are shot in the dark without much light. This is soft core, but that term does not tell all. I can find soft core erotic, but don’t find art erotic. Some sets have no explicit shots, most have only a few. The videos mostly do not tease as they have the model moving too fast. I would prefer a scene to linger as appropriate. Finding what I like is tedious as there is just so much to see. When you finish checking out a photoset and want to move on, you can look for more of the same model and many have multiple photosets, more of the same photographer, especially if you like his style of photography and model presentation, more sets with the same tags, or the one updated before or after-you can see a thumbnail of the model.

Tags are comments that subscribers add to the sets. You may see for example, “killer body” or “pretty face“. Obviously these are a matter of opinion. Some tags are not so easy to use though. If you use “unshaven“, you get sets with full bush or even as little as barely a landing strip. You never know what may turn up in the search. The same is true for “open labia” . There is a large gray area here. In some sets you cannot even see the labia, but the tag is still there.

I find that about an hour of downloading is about all that I can reasonably do. This requires a lot of patience and attention to detail. The temptation to go all over the place following the searches can be a bit overwhelming. Should I check out more of the same model or should I switch to searching for open labia?

I cannot leave without mentioning the customer service. I accidentally signed up twice using two different billing processors. Each came with a prechecked cross sell for another site and I did not catch that. The member name and password were randomly generated and I did not know which went with each subscription. It was a complete mess so I contacted customer service. Despite that fact that it was a Sunday, everything was corrected in about five minutes. No hassles, no runaround that I should contact the processors. My highest compliments to their staff!!

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (0) Excellent review.
I agree with almost everything you wrote.
Also, pleasantly surprised you gave Met-Art a score of 99.
Makes me feel that I am in good company. :)

12-13-15  02:53pm

Reply To Message

2

mbaya (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

In spite if its flaws, this site is well deserving of a 99. I does so much so well that it can make you overlook where it is weak.
12-13-15  04:30pm

Reply To Message

3

TheBrickster (0) REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :

I agree. Met Art strikes that balance perfectly well; it's seductive and sensual, but just "dirty" enough with tight close-ups.
12-17-15  01:38pm

Reply To Message

4

Monahan (0) I can go along with a 99 because Met Art is very transparent about what they do and don't do; namely all natural young ladies displaying their lovely body parts to superb photo pros.

However the sameness becomes boring. Some days the updates look very familiar because the girls look very familiar and assume virtually the same poses.

12-19-15  11:23am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.