Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen (0)

Newbie
85*
rearadmiral (0) 12-28-15  11:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Beautiful teen models
- Mix of solo, lesbian and hardcore
- Great for both photo and video fans
- 452 videos
- 2356 photo sets
- Site updates regularly
- Supports download managers
- TBP Discount
Cons: - Video resolutions and bitrates are lower than average
- Bonus sites aren't worth considering in your decision to join
- Photos are lower resolution than many comparable sites
Bottom Line: I went into this membership with high hopes because the models look to be exactly what I like: young and petite. The site isn't perfect, but it has a narrow focus and it sure does that one thing well: you’ll see some of the freshest porn models here. What I think bugs me most about this site is that it is so good that if the few flaws fixed on a go-forward basis this would be one of the best teen-themed sites on the ‘net.

I think the best thing this site has are the models. There is a mix of up-and-coming porn stars and girls who just dabbled a bit in porn once or twice. There is also a mix of American and Eastern European / Russian models, but the majority are American. The common theme in the models is that they are all petite, just over 18 and, in my opinion, exceptionally hot. I realize that this is entirely subjective, but these are the exact kind of models I prefer. If you share this interest then a membership here is definitely worth considering.

The site has been around since 2007 and has amassed 450+ videos and 2350+ photo sets. The site updates with two photo sets and one video being added per week. Occasionally there will be two videos per week. The videos are a mix of solo, girl/girl and hardcore. This is just a guess, but it seems that for the last few years at least the split is somewhere around 45% solo, 45% hardcore and 10% girl/girl.

The videos don’t follow any specific theme except the setup is intended to showcase the age and freshness of the models. The newer videos are offered with some choice: 1280x720, 640x360, 854x480 in MP4 and 640x360 in WMV. Bitrates are crucial to a video looking good but there isn't any consistency here. Even on the highest resolutions the bitrates can vary quite a bit. I have some scenes with bitrates as low as 1500kb/s. It does appear that the site is now fairly consistent in having bitrates around 3500kb/s. Older videos are WMV only and come in 640x480. Anything older than early 2011 and you will have to be satisfied with lower resolutions and bitrates. It is even later before 1280x720 is offered consistently.

The video quality is obviously the site’s biggest flaw. While 720p videos are my choice as a balance between size and look I realize that others want the highest resolution possible. Maybe 4K won’t happen, but it seems odd in 2015 to not offer 1280p. An immediate improvement could be made by using better bitrates. All isn't lost though, as the newer videos are encoded in a way to take full advantage of their less-than-stellar specs.

Another odd choice that seems to harken back to a decade ago is that the scenes are offered as five-minute clips. Some readers may disagree, but in my opinion the video offerings are outdated. Having 1280x720 as the top download is below what most people expect these days. Offering five-minute clips seems like it’s from a different internet era. Are there people buying porn memberships that still download this way?

Photos are a key part of the site too. This is one of the rare sites where photo collectors and video collectors could both feel the site offers good value. The photos do suffer from the same drawbacks as the videos in that they aren’t very high resolution. The newest photos come in 400x600, 800x1200 and 2000x3000. Older photos are available in a maximum of 768x1200.

The videos are offered in streaming too, and there is an in-browser photo slideshow available.

There are a few minor concerns. The biggest of these is that the search function really doesn’t work well. I did a search for anal scenes and got some scenes that had no anal. To make matters worse, I couldn’t sort those results to get only videos.

Some minor positives are that the site offers a TBP discount and allows download managers. The TBP page says that managers aren't supported but I had no problem using IDM to queue-up scenes. It may be that multiple simultaneous downloads are blocked. I didn’t run into any download limits.

The site offers two bonus sites (Picking Up Pussy and T&A Tryouts) but both of these sites are small and offer what look to be old scenes with new release dates added. You may like the bonus sites, but I wouldn’t use factor them in on a decision to join the main site.

I would definitely recommend this site to anyone looking for videos and/or photos of some of the freshest porn models on the ‘net. With the TBP discount this site offers a great value. The older material is definitely not up to par by 2015/2016 standards, but that’s to be expected. Some minor improvements to the current videos and photos would take this site over the top. I’ll be adding this to my list of sites to join regularly.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

tangub (0) It's interesting that you say the site has been around since 2007, I've just checked my stash and I actually had a membership here back in early 2005 and even then they had several years content dating back as far as late 1998.

Looking at the tour I see a lot of models who I have in my collection from way back then so it makes me wonder if they are recycling content. Their early photo sets from the late 90s carried the site name Babyface Mag before changing the name to 18 Eighteen early 2001.

12-28-15  04:27pm

Reply To Message

2

LPee23 (0) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

Wow, I never thought I'd hear of Babyface Mag again. I have an old peeing set bearing that watermark from the 90's.
12-28-15  05:59pm

Reply To Message

3

tangub (0) REPLY TO #2 - LPee23 :

I would guess there's a good chance I would have that set too since I saved every Babyface set that was ever available on 18 Eighteen back then. I have often wondered if the old Babyface content is still available online or if it's a valuable part of my collection that would be lost forever should I ever have the misfortune to suffer the death of an external drive.

Rearadmiral's review stating the site goes back to 2007 would seem to suggest the classic stuff from the late 90s early 2000s has gone unless some of it has been recycled with later dates. Even though it's been over 10 years since I had a membership here I've never seen enough in the site tour to suggest that it would be worth spending money to go back again.

12-28-15  11:37pm

Reply To Message

4

rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

Thanks for the additional information. I really can't confirm the start date for the site because the older videos and photos aren't dated, but I've done more digging and you're definitely right that the site pre-dates 2007. I based my information on going to the oldest video (which gives no date information) and the oldest photo set, which is dated from 2007. But based on what you said I dug around a bit more and I can find photo sets that are 'newer' given their location on the site but date from 2005. If I continue to dig I might even find older stuff.

It seems odd that they have older material that is newer in the update schedule. That might point to recycling content, as you note.

12-29-15  05:03am

Reply To Message

5

tangub (0) REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral :

I've just spent an hour trawling through the photos section of the tour and it seems to imply that they still have all the old stuff there going back as far as the old Babyface stuff from the late 90s. Now that I've had a closer look at the tour I would say they are probably not recycling content.

I'm quite tempted to sign up here again now that you've brought this classic site back to my attention but I have another membership going at the moment and don't really have the time for more than one so I'll have to put it on the back burner for a couple of weeks.

12-29-15  12:53pm

Reply To Message

6

LPee23 (0) REPLY TO #3 - tangub :

This is a site that I've been meaning to check out for a while. I'll let you know if I see the Babyface Mag content when I do.
12-29-15  04:11pm

Reply To Message

7

rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #5 - tangub :

Thanks for the clarification. I try hard to not make mistakes in my reviews but I somehow misjudged how old some of the photosets are. They must be mixed in and not in chronological order.
12-31-15  02:04pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.