Erotic Beauty (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Easy login.
-Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec download speed, which is about my maximum download connection.
-Good site structure. Easy to navigate around the site. Since there are so many models and photo sets, you need a simple structure to navigate through the massive contents.
-Alphabetical listing of models, with nice sized thumbnails to show what each model looks like.
-Each photo set has zip files for download, with 3 different definitions to choose from: high, medium, low definition.
-This is a high grade photo site.
-Over 160 contributing photographers, many of them world-class.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before you are timed out of the site due to inactivity.
-Accepts download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. |
| Cons: |
-No videos. Photo sets only.
-This is psychology, but since you have a massive amount of beautiful young models, you start to get bored with physical beauty. And many of these models are amazingly beautiful.
-Update rate: 1 photo set per day. This seems poor when compared to MetArt, which averages 4 photo sets per day. But one update per day is probably average for high-end photo sites.
-Erotic beauty has the thumbnails of a photo set presented on up to 7 different pages, so you have to click from one page to another to see the entire set. MetArt has the thumbnails of a set on 2 pages, so it's easier to examine the complete
set without a lot of mouse clicks. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm reviewing Erotic Beauty, but I think the most meaningful approach is to compare it to MetArt, which is a sister site in the MetArt network of sites.
I've been a member of MetArt and Erotic Beauty numerous times in the past. I finally bought a lifetime membership to MetArt, since I consider it the best softcore site on the internet. And I've been a continuous member of Erotic Beauty for over two
years, since I last joined it using a special offer that was unbelievably inexpensive.
I'm not saying I'm an expert on either site. But I've been enjoying their content for many years.
Erotic Beauty is a high end glamour site, which focuses on softcore teen/early twenties models.
It's basically a smaller version of the MetArt site.
Both sites share the same approach: find attractive teen or early twenties models, and use a wide variety of professional photographers to capture their beauty.
If MetArt didn't exist, Erotic Beauty would be an excellent site to join. But the problem is that MetArt does exist, and a comparison of the two sites shows that MetArt is the far better value for your money:
As far as I can tell, there is nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt: nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness.
Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted to the MetArt site. And vice versa.
The main advantage MetArt has over Erotic Beauty is the massive backlog of photo sets.
Erotic Beauty has over 3,700 photo sets.
MetArt has over 16,300 photo sets. A massive number that dwarfs the Erotic Beauty backlog.
Erotic Beauty has over 1,700 models.
MetArt has over 3,100 models.
Erotic Beauty updates with one photo set per day.
MetArt updates with aproximately 4 photo sets per day.
So the the MetArt content will grow even faster than the Erotic Beauty content.
Both sites have the same membership fee: $19.99/month with a PU discount
Erotic Beauty has no videos.
MetArt has over 1,300 videos.
In my opinion, most of the MetArt videos are boring. You have lovely young girls, in softcore poses, and the videos are mainly a waste of time. The photo sets at MetArt (and Erotic Beauty), although softcore, are far more erotic and
interesting than the videos at MetArt. I can't explain the reason the MetArt videos are so boring, although I have noticed that many softcore sites seem to specialize in making softcore videos that are a waste of time.
That's my opinion, anyway, and it seems to be shared by the PU members who have commented on how boring the MetArt videos are.
The value of MetArt (and Erotic Beauty) comes from their photo sets.
Many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty also appear in MetArt. Although both sites use many of the same models, the photo sets that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site has exclusive content.
Both sites share the same basic structure.
Both sites offer zip files for each photo set in three definitions: low, medium, and high definition.
Both sites have an alphabetical listing of their models, with nice-sized thumbnails to illustrate each model.
But since the number of models at both sites is so large (over 1,700 at Erotic Beauty, over 3,100 at MetArt), it's exhausting looking through the alphabetical listing to see all the different models. There's just too many attractive girls, and you start to get bored by physical beauty.
Since both MetArt and Erotic Beauty cost the same for a membership, and since MetArt has a catalog of photo sets that is over four times as large, and since there is no added value in an Erotic Beauty photo set over a MetArt photo set, the
advantage obviously belongs to MetArt.
I'm giving Erotic Beauty a score of 85, because it's a good site, but MetArt is a much better value. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
