Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

Have you subscribed to any sites whose quality (videos and/or photos) actually got worse over time?

Type: Content

Submitted by Drooler (0)
Yes 65% 11 Votes
No 24% 4 Votes
Other (see reply) 12% 2 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

17 Votes Total

Feb 28, 2016

Poll Replies (7)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Jay G (Disabled) Did not get better should have been an option. ;)
02-29-16  04:41am

Reply To Message

2

GCode (0) I have been on a few sites where they are quality but every few updates a video quality just sucks for no reason. It's like the good camera went bad or the good one was forgotten/lost and the production was just like oh well; use the crap one! I mean if it was a problem with encoding then retry to get it right. I don't know it is just amazing to me that any video can be as bad as I see sometimes these days. Besides performers it is the only thing that is needed to make a crude production. Pretty much any camera should get an extremely clear picture with at least 1280x720 resolution bought in the recent decade. It just does not make sense to me when seeing a terrible quality video on any site making current exclusive scenes. I brought up encoding failure earlier but that's almost becoming a non-factor due to auto encoding on cameras as they are recording these days.

Anyways, I suppose I can be harsh on this subject but it would be interesting to know if a site actually got worse videos as time progressed and how it would be even possible lol

02-29-16  09:55am

Reply To Message

3

LPee23 (0) I've been at a couple of sites where the quality of photos got worse over time. They had switched to a flash based slideshow program for their photos that automatically sized them to the browser's window, while the original photos were much larger.

There was also one site that took their WMVs offline because they were an "obsolete format," yet many of their remaining MP4's were lower resolution than the WMVs.

02-29-16  12:25pm

Reply To Message

4

pat362 (0) I'll second Jay G's comment because I have been a member of a site where the quality of their videos would be considered mediocre at best and I'm fine with that. Largely because I know the source material precedes modern video technology.
02-29-16  04:41pm

Reply To Message

5

Monahan (0) I answered YES because I've signed up for sites with great preview sites but once on board, it was clear they stopped updating months (years?) earlier.
02-29-16  05:23pm

Reply To Message

6

Drooler (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - Jay G :

Sorry, but that's a different question from the one asked. ;)
03-02-16  02:03am

Reply To Message

7

Homegirl (Disabled) Of course the content gets worse over time. Things change .
05-27-20  05:43pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.