Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Woodman Casting X (0)

Newbie 80* rearadmiral (0) 02-22-16  04:01pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Exclusive content - Some amazing hardcore scenes - Many beautiful European and Russian models - Tons of anal sex (yes, that’s a positive thing for me) - Supports download managers - Large site (almost 500 scenes) - Includes a sub-site with access to scenes from Private Studio Cons: - Wide chasm between file resolutions - Slow download speeds - Fewer download options than there used to be - Streaming begins automatically Bottom Line: Many will remember Pierre Woodman from his glory days with Private Studio where he was behind some big-budget, shot-on-location features with many of the hottest models in the business. Those days are over it seems and I suspect the porn economy is the biggest culprit. Woodman is still making porn but it is quite different from those big-budget features. Some people – and I might be one of them depending on my mood when asked – might say that Woodman’s current porn is better than he used to make. The locations aren't exotic – they’re shot in a hotel room, the women are beautiful but not all up to the Private calibre and the male talent is now Pierre himself, in all his hairy, middle-aged glory rather than the buff swordsmen he used to hire. But while Woodman no longer has the budget to shoot classy-but-hard hardcore in the Caribbean he manages to produce some of the hottest hardcore porn available today. Do not ever make the mistake of thinking this might be fun for you and the missus to curl up and watch lest she have you arrested for being a pervert. Most of the scenes follow a formula: there’s an interview, some undressing and then the fun begins. That ‘fun’ usually includes deep-throating, rimming, vaginal sex, anal play and anal sex. The scenes are almost as hard as what you’ll find at Legal Porno (without the unusual membership requirements) and almost as misogynistic as Max Hardcore at his worst. Woodman puts many beautiful European and Russian – and a few American – models through the wringer of some super-intense sex. For those who like anal, it’s fair to say that at least 90% of the scenes feature some serious anal sex. It’s also fair to say that not all porn is meant to appeal to all people and this is a perfect example of that. Don’t join this site if you think EroticaX pushes the limits of what you’ll watch. While the porn is amazing the site itself drops the ball. The site is a bit illogical but browsing around for a few minutes will give you some comfort. I last reviewed this site a few years ago and either the site has changed or I made a serious error in my earlier review. But the change is so specific that it makes more sense that the site changed. The last time I looked at the site it offered three resolutions and two formats. There are still three resolutions available (now only MP4) but the range they cover is too broad in my opinion. There is a low “smartphone” resolution, an “HQ” resolution” (960x540, 1400kb/s) and then a higher resolution file. That higher resolution is either 4K or 1920x1280 with bitrates over 10,000kb/s. File sizes can be up to 15GB though!! If my older review is correct the site used to offer a 1280x720 resolution and they really should make that available again because you can’t call the difference between the file options a gap – it’s a wide chasm. I try to download the file that offers the best balance between clarity and file size but the available options here don’t allow for that compromise. One thing that hasn’t changed is a minor complaint: when opening a scene page the scene will start streaming automatically. Make sure your speakers are turned off before accessing a scene. To add to the problem is the fact that the download speeds are much lower than I’m used to. I usually see speeds between 22 and 25 MB/s but here I had between 3 and 5 MB/s. Downloading one of the 15GB files at those speeds would take a long time but the site does support download managers. The site currently has close to 500 scenes. These are all exclusive and most are more than an hour long. The site appears to be updating but not on any regular schedule. Some updates are only a day apart while other times ten days may pass between an update. I suspect that a lot of this is due to Woodman pretty much running a one-man show. The membership includes access to a sub-site call “Scenes XXX” which gives access to a lot of Woodman’s older work. The scene resolutions are the same as with the main page. The main page might be interpreted as including two other sites – Wake Up N Fuck and Woodman Films – but that interpretation would be wrong. WUNF is a stand-alone site that requires a separate membership and it appears that WF uses a PPV or similar model. There’s still good value for your membership here, but don’t join expecting wider free access. (Though I highly recommend checking out WUNF.) The intensity and rawness of the porn is enough for me to wholeheartedly recommend the site to anyone who likes those traits. There are several serious flaws and what bugs me about those flaws – the lack of a ‘middle’ resolution and slow speeds – is that they could be easily fixed making this a much better site. I’ll definitely be back again and again, and I hope the next time I join I’ll find 1080p videos and fast downloads. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (5) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 lk2fireone (0) Excellent review. I'm curious what you pay for your internet access. I pay $40/month, which is a discounted rate, to Time Warner Cable, in California. When I download files (photo sets, videos) from the internet, my max speed is about 5 MB/sec. That would be equivalent to 8 * 5 = 40 Mbps. A capital B stands for Byte. A small b stands for bit. 1 byte = 8 bits Are you really getting 22 to 25 MB/sec? Or are you getting (22 to 25 Mb/sec) divided by 8 = 2.75 to 3.125 MB/sec? Also, how much are you paying for internet access? I'm paying $40/month, for internet access only. That does not include TV or phone access. What I'm asking is, are the rates so much cheaper in Canada, that you can afford very high speed internet access? If I paid more, I could have a faster internet connection, but 5 MB/sec speed is OK for me. 02-22-16  05:03pm Reply To Message 2 rooka (0) Good job. Just wish his camera work was better than one on a tripod..... 02-23-16  07:43am Reply To Message 3 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #2 - rooka : Agreed. I suspect this is part of the whole budget issue... 02-23-16  02:28pm Reply To Message 4 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone : Thanks for the comment. I’m not very technically-minded so I was worried that I might have misread my specs. But I checked and I do see download speeds of 25MB/s using Internet Download Manger. Could IDM make a difference? I wish I could tell you how much I’m paying for this but I can’t with any certainty because my wife pays that bill and our internet service is bundled with two separate landlines, one cellphone with long distance and data, and TV. One advantage that we may have is that we have fiberop right to the house. I realize that many ISPs get fiberop into neighbourhoods, but I have a fiberop line right into a box in my house. I think if the internet was bought as a stand-alone service it’d pretty pricey. Looking at their pricing guide I think I’d pay between $80 and $100 per month. It’s lower than that for me because of the bundle. Having said all that, I may have to update my answer because for some reason my internet connection is really slow right now. I did a speed test that showed it much slower than I’m used to. Then I went to an active membership I have at Swallow Salon where I see fast downloads and tried downloading last week’s update again. The file size is 1.08GB and I know when I downloaded it last week it took about a minute. Tonight I’m seeing 1MB/s and the download would have taken more than eight minutes if I let it continue. But I know that it was only a minute or so last week. I suspect that the rates are likely higher here in Canada. They certainly are for cellphones. I hope some of this helps. 02-23-16  02:53pm Reply To Message 5 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral : Thanks for the reply. It sounds like you are paying a very low rate for your services. I'm paying $40/month for 5 MB/sec download access. That is not a bundle: That does not include TV access or landline access or cell phone access. And that is a low rate in California, because other service providers I checked wanted much higher rates. But everyone seems to want to sell bundled services. 02-23-16  03:09pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.