Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit The Life Erotic

The Life Erotic (0)

Newbie
92*
exotics4me (0) 02-29-16  11:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Met-Art network, which means the quality is very high as are production values.
- Wanders away from the usual Met models, there's a fairly high percentage of at least medium build models and some very curvy ones. Count that one twice.
- Daily updates, but there doesn't seem to be any set pattern to the updates. Picture set can be an update. Video can be, but they don't follow a strict photo/video/photo style schedule. Will further in BL.
- Good download speeds which also seems to be true of the other Met-Art Network sites.
- There's some kinky thrown in which is pretty rare on this network. Light bondage/spanking.
- PU price is good and worth a monthly join.
- Large site overall: 825 models, 1,690 photo sets, 608 videos.
- Easy to use navigation, though they could add some options in the advanced search filters.
Cons: - I'm starting to be annoyed by their ads over on the right of the screen. They have 10 ads that look similar to the updates for what I'm thinking are chat models. It breaks up the cleanness of the site's layout.
- They do a good job overall of creating scenes that are "erotic", but much like heartcore porn, the models are responsible for being believable. That can be hit or miss on here.
- Would like to see more videos. Especially videos of the photo sets, not meaning BTS, but instead I want to see the models in action.
- Should have put this on the other Met-Art Network site reviews. What need is there for a 20 second Met-Art Films logo at the beginning of every scene?
Bottom Line: This site is one of the more unique sites on Met-Art's Network. There's no boy/girl scenes, but there are lesbian scenes and solo. Nothing here really makes you think of Met-Art except the high quality. They have models who are curvy and models who look like they turned 18 quite a few years ago, not days ago. I definitely prefer the models here over any of the other models on their network.

You also get some kinky scenes. Light bondage and girls spanking girls are the most common. I don't think "anal" falls into kinky anymore, but it is common to see anal masturbation on here. So you do get a little more than you are used to with a Met-Art site, but it's a welcome change for me.

My first and biggest problem with the site is the search feature. All of the sites on this network have the same or similar navigation and it's really simple to use. The thing is with a site like The Life Erotic you have many different scenarios in the scenes since they do go into kinkier content than the other network sites. The advanced search doesn't allow you to search for specific actions. Instead, you are left using the user tags. Which as most porn users know can be a pain. For example: "more of her please" is a tag. And my favorites: "perfect pussy", "beautiful pussy" and "wet pussy". What the hell's the difference? Anyway, you get my point. They should add another box to the advanced search.

You can't complain about the technical quality. Pictures are in the 5500 long end range and are downloadable in zips. Videos have the 1080p option. All 608 also have the 1080p option so you're not going to have to settle for lower quality even with their oldest content.

You might complain a little about the artsy-side of the site. I normally would including the dreaded hot candle wax dripping on the body of the model, but they sell it well. It fits with the scenes it's used in. Today was a good day to review this site since my favorite model (Rebeka) on this site is today's update and she's in a lace bodysuit which is also a favorite. If you're only into videos you might complain after a month's membership. I broke the total number down in the pros and here's the breakdown for February 2016:

29 photo sets, 12 videos. I'm not that bothered by the number as much as I would like to see an accompanying video of the photo sets. Like today's update of Rebeka, it's a photo set. She has 6 photo sets on the site, but 0 videos. On the other hand, it's probably unfair to complain about a site that updates 41 times in 29 days.

The lesbian scenes are very good. Though they also sometimes get a little artsy. One of their recent scenes shows an example of their writing/production quality. A model named Nasty S ties up Solana, spanks her a little, teases her entire body, then walks out of the scene. Leaving Solana turned on and having to masturbate. It might not sound like much, but it's a little different than what most sites do with masturbation scenes.

I would make a comparison of this site to a French site with Art in its name except there's no boy/girl scenes on The Life Erotic. I think the best part of this site is the content is enjoyable. You don't feel like you've already seen the scene before watching it since they throw the twists and turns in. It works in keeping the content unique. It will go on my steadily dwindling "revisit site" list once my membership runs out.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (0) Agree there's no need for a long logo at the start of a scene.
But that seems to be a common practice with sites.
Maybe it's intended as a form of advertising, or to protect the content from unlicensed use?
Whatever, it can be annoying.
Just like the large logos that are on the photos of some sites, that can block parts of the photo.

03-01-16  07:25am

Reply To Message

2

Monahan (0) Been a member for 3 months and let it expire two days ago. I had my notes ready to write my review but yours covered all of my points plus a lot more. We agree on virtually everything except the score, which I would say is an 85.* The reason being that the number of models is far smaller than Met Art and the navigation isn't as easy as Met Art.

Also, as you said, the tag feature really sucks. It isn't great on Met Art either, but it's a whole lot better there thsn on TLE.

I would have dropped the site after 2 months but I missed the deadline.

It's on my annual consideration list. Next year I'll sign up for a month to drain off any new stuff that's worth keeping.

* I just posted my 85 score for the site.

03-05-16  06:35pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.