Goddess Nudes (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-$9.99/month membership fee with PU discount. Very cheap price.
-Ccbill is the billing agent. A trusted name.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Goddess Nudes is part of the MetArt network. The customer service at MetArt network is outstanding. If you have any problems, send an email to customer service, and they will probably respond in a few hours. I've never joined any site or network that had a better or more responsive Customer Service department. The truth is, the customer service at many paysites is either non-responsive or non-existent.
-Fast download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed.
-Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager. |
| Cons: |
-Cons are basically minor, if you know what the site is.
-No videos.
-Site navigation could be improved.
-After Goddess Nudes became part of MetArt network, they included a txt file to the zip file for a gallery that includes the physical characteristics of the model. But they could also include a short bio on the model, which is what they do at MetArt. And since many of the models at Goddess Nudes are also at MetArt.com or other sites in the MetArt network, that should take very little work to do. |
| Bottom Line: |
Domai was started around 1997. Goddess Nudes was started in 2010. Both were started by Eolake Stobblehouse. Stobblehouse said he appreciated looking at beautiful women, and he wanted to share this pleasure with others. He started Domai as a hobby, and only later started selling memberships. So it became a business. He wanted to proselytize that nudity is not sinful. That beauty is to be enjoyed. That life is to be enjoyed. He argued that tasteful, nude art is not porn, but art. Domai (and later Goddess Nudes) focused on innocent nudes of attractive young women. Both sites became owned by the MetArt network in 2014, after Eolake Stobblehouse became ill and could no longer operate them.
Domai and Goddess Nudes are similar sites:
-they both feature young women (late teens, early twenties) in nude, tasteful poses (extreme softcore) in a variety of natural settings.
-As the older site, Domai has the larger backlog of galleries and models. But Goddess Nudes has a large amount of content as well:
Domai
Models: 995
Contributing photographers: 133
Galleries: 2,704
Goddess Nudes
Models: 747
Contributing photographers: 130
Galleries: 1,709
Both sites are photos only. No videos.
Both sites feature simple, natural photos shot by a variety of professional photographers,
Both sites advertise exclusive content.
Both sites are softcore only. Goddess Nudes is supposed to be more explicit, but it's still strictly softcore.
The navigation (and site layout) for both sites is similar.
Both sites update with one photo set per day on weekdays.
Both sites have the photosets categorized by the year posted.
Both sites have the models and photosets categorized by the contributing photographer.
Both sites also have thumbnails of the models in a downside listing in a row of thumbnails. Which takes a long while to click through.
Both sites share many of the models and contributing photographers.
Neither site has a search engine to find models by categories or traits. You can put the name of a model into a basic search engine, and that will return the model, but then you have to click to find her galleries.
So what are the major differences between the two site?
One: Domai has more content than Goddess Nudes.
Two: The content at each site is exclusive to that site.
Three: Goddess Nudes is supposed to be more explicit than Domai, but they are both softcore photo sites.
So why choose one site over the other?
The simple answer is: If you like Domai, you will almost certainly like Goddess Nudes.
So, join Domai first, because it has more content.
Then, assuming you liked Domai, join Goddess Nudes, because you will get access to the same type of content, but with material that will be new to you.
I'm giving Goddess Nudes a score of 85. Based on:
The attractive models.
The photography that is professional, simple and natural.
The low membership price of $9.99/month.
Do not join either site if you want videos. Neither site has them.
Do not join either site if you want more than extremely softcore photos of attractive women.
Do not join either site if you want the models made to look glamourous or exotic. These are lovely young women who are photographed in simple settings, without a lot of artifice. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
