Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Beauty Angels

Beauty Angels (0)

Newbie
92*
lk2fireone (0) 06-26-16  05:57pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring).
-Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name.
-Attractive Eastern European teen models.
-You can stream or download the videos.
-Multiple definition choices for video download: 405p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-Zip file for each gallery.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout due to inactivity.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor.

-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.

-There is only one definition for the zip file for each gallery. Many of the galleries are worth keeping. These are attractive models, and the individual photos are surprisingly high quality for what was formerly a hardcore gonzo-style teen
video network with poor screen-cap galleries that were a waste of hard space. Now the galleries are just a step below what you will find at photo sites like MetArt, Femjoy, or MPL Studios.

-The network logo on the photos is too big. This is mainly noticeable when you are viewing the enlarged photos.

-Videos and zip galleries download with a generic filename. Instead, the filename should include:
The model's name; date posted to site; name of site.

-Middling download speeds. I averaged about 2-3 MB/sec. Normally I get about 4-5 MB/sec from many sites.
Bottom Line: Site theme: solo and lesbian teen sex.

Site stats:
Videos: 393
Galleries (1 for each video): 393

I last reviewed this site on 2011-03-30.
What are the changes to this site since then?
There are 3 major changes that I can see right away:
1. The site has a new software program that allows you to view the images of each gallery more easily. This is a major improvement over the old system.
2. The quality of the galleries has improved massively. The older galleries were poor screencaps of each video. I'm guessing that there is some software program that is being used to create the galleries from the video shoot. The quality of each photo is good to excellent. The quality is not Met-Art or MPL Studios level, but it's surprisingly close. The photos are centered, and clear and crisp, and showcase the model. And since the models are so attractive, it's worth
collecting these galleries.
3. Over the years, the owners have put a lot of effort into making the site (and network) user friendly.
It's easy to switch between sites in the network. You don't have to re-enter your username and password.
The model listing is complete: with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with links to her videos (and photosets).
Years ago, when you joined any one of the sites in the network, you did not know beforehand which network sites you would have access to. Now when you join any site in the network, you have access to all the sites in the network. Which makes it
less frustrating. Before, if you had favorite sites in the network, you might or might not have access to them.

This site (and network) gives outstanding value for your porn dollars based on the following criteria:
-the high level of attractiveness of the models
-the large amount of content of the site (and the massive amount of network content);
-the ease of use of the site (and network);
-the low monthly (or yearly) fee for membership.


This is mainly a gonzo teen site. The network covers a wide variety of niches. The models are almost entirely white, Eastern European girls. Mainly slender. Not a lot of tattoos or piercings. But in recent years, the site (and network) have moved up in quality, spending more on the sets, better lighting, higher definition of videos, and other improvements.

I think the site (and network) gives a lot of value for your porn dollars.
And the site (because of network access) gets a score of 92.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to lk2fireone!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.