Mr. Skin (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A huge number of clips of nude women in movies and tv shows.
-You can do searches in a number of ways. But I am not a fan of their search, or the site structure. See my cons.
-Low membership price with PU discount: $9.95/month.
-This is a very brief tag to describe each scene: Sexy; Sexy, underwear; Sexy, thong; Sexy, bikini; Nude, breasts;
The tags are basically helpful, except sometimes they aren't. For example, some tags state "Nude, breasts", but the clip just shows a breast that is covered by a bra. I don't consider that nude. Just like I don't consider a woman wearing a bikini or underwear as nude, which is what some "nude" tagged clips are.
-You can do search by many different factors:
Actress name. title. keyword(age, nationality, hair color, etc.)
-Automatic login to site (if cookies are enabled).
Don't need to enter username and password. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Navigation is poor.
I don't know why more people haven't complained about the site structure, which was designed by an idiot.
-The quality/definition of the clips varies. Some clips are high definition, other clips are standard definition. A lot of the value of a nude clip depends on how well you can view the images, and the colorization (and degradation) from the original source).
-This is a personal opinion. But even though some of the clips show nudity, they often lose the impact and potency of the original scene. Maybe it's because the clips are too short: They lose the build-up to the scene.
There is no automatic notice that you are logged in to the site.
Most sites have some indicator (in the address bar or someplace else) that tells you you are logged in to the site.
I was searching for the log-in link a couple of times, before I realized I was already in the site itself.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION BELOW: |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS CONTINUED:
-The site was not designed for members ease of use.
One example:
There is a blog. One blog entry is "Top Ten Nude Debuts of 2016".
To show you the top ten nude debuts of 2016, the site does not give you a list of the actresses/models.
Instead, it gives you a slideshow of screencaps of the actresses. That you have to click through.
The name of each actress is in tiny letters at the bottom of the screencap, that is difficult to read.
One member comment on this blog entry:
"How about you make the name and titles big enough to read. Doesn't help me if I don't know where to look."
If you fiddle around, you can enlarge each screen cap (with a few mouse-clicks), to be able to read the name of the actress, and the movie she appears nude in.
But why not make it easy for members to read the actress name and movie, without the mouse clicks?
And without additional clicks to find the next actress on the list?
-There is a learning curve to using this site. I am getting old. So it's irritating if the site navigation is not simple and easy to use. If I have problems searching the site contents, I enjoy the site less than otherwise. And this site was created by someone who knew the foibles of the site structure, and figured the members would figure out the foibles by themselves.
-Many of the photos are screencaps.
-Most clips are very short. Two or three minutes runtime. Many clips are 30 seconds or shorter.
-Most of content is softcore.
BOTTOM LINE:
The Mr. Skin clips are both good and bad: Good, to give you a slight taste of the nude appearances of these celebreties/actresses, but not enough to fill your appetite if you remember the original movies in any detail.
-Cons: the quality in some the clips is just OK. The clips are not high definition, even when taken from a standard commercial movie. Either the copying is done poorly, or some other factor controls the poor image quality. Todays porn consumers are accustomed to the high quality or ultra high quality available at many porn sites.
For example, the Two Moon Junction (1988) clips seem poor definition.
Two Moon Junction (1988) was directed and written by Zalman King, who also did 9½ Weeks (1986), Wild Orchid (1989), and the Red Shoe Diary series (1990s) on cable.
Part of the appeal of Zalman King's work was the high definition (for the time), vivid images, strong colors, erotic content, along with main-stream actors/actresses and plot structure.
The Zalman King clips should be one of the site highlights. But they are disappointing.
-The site will appeal mainly to fans of celebrity nudity.
The problem is:
For a softcore site, the site does not offer high-grade photos or clips that we want.
There is probably no hardcore sex offered for hardcore fans.
So bottom line: this is mainly for celebrity softcore fans, who want to see their idols in brief nude scenes.
I doubt that many PU members would remain a member for more than one month.
This site would have much more value if this were not the internet age: where the internet will give you many of these same images and clips for free.
Yahoo now allows nudity in its clips and movies.
But for a simple way to access brief celebrity nudity, the site will have its fans. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
