| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
I agree with you that you should respect a site that is so honest about their content and it's quite bold of them but it does open a can of worms that they may have a hard time closing because they have now openly criticized two of their performers. These same women can in return criticize the site by saying that on-set conditions were less than ideal which made them uncomfortable performing said scene.
In the end it will be a sort of he said she said argument that no one ever wins.
|
01-03-17 08:52am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
I suppose it could turn into a problem for them. On the other hand, I've seen ALS Scan post similarly blunt assessments of scenes, or shoots, or particular models with no blow-back that I'm aware of.
|
01-04-17 04:53pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - PinkPanther :
You are probably right because unlike hardcore sites that expect a lot more from their performers. ALS and In The Crack put out content that is mostly softcore to a more intense type of midcore so models will always be willing to work for them if for no other reason that they get paid money to basically play with themselves.
|
01-05-17 10:33am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
inthecrack (0)
Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
This subject touches upon perhaps my biggest pet peeve. I don’t know why truth in advertising has to be such a foreign concept to most people. Any business that claims to be the greatest “this” and have the best “that” has absolutely no credibility with me, particularly when that claim is coming from within. If 10 competing companies all claim to have the best widget then 9 of them are lying. As soon as one of them volunteers information that some aspect of their product is not as good as it could be then I know every other claim they have is probably spot on. It’s obviously not any different with an adult entertainment website. You know if every single scene on some porn site is claimed to be awesome then something doesn’t add up. Any customer that takes the time to read through what is written on our site will certainly be able to take our word as genuine since we have established some pretty solid credibility with our honesty.
As for blow back from models? If there is any I have not heard of it yet. Off the top of my head I can think of 2 or 3 models in the last 16 years that have ever said anything negative about their ITC shoot and they were all because they didn’t like the camera getting up close, not because of anything that was written. I think most girls just love that they are getting some quality images where they are not getting cum on or smacked around or made to look like a ditzy teenager. I can say that there is no “can of worms” that comes from providing an honest website.
|
01-16-17 05:42pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - inthecrack :
Be advised that what I'm about to write may be way off because I originally commented on what the poster wrote without doing any research so hopefully I'm not in left field. I think that any site that is willing to be honest with their paying customer should be commended and considered to be one of the better sites on the net.
Where I think there may be a problem is if a site chooses to upload a scene that they did not consider to be very good in the first place in lieu of one that was. In my opinion a site is better to simply scrap a bad scene or instead use it as a bonus scene. I've been aware of your site for many years and since you are still in business than I know you have to be one of the better ones on the net.
|
01-17-17 03:32pm
Reply To Message
|
