| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- downloads will resume if your connection is interrupted
- epoch is an option for billing
- no download limits |
| Cons: |
- No download limits mean you could grab all the videos from this small site in an hour or two if their speeds were modern
- did I mention that speeds are really bad?
- Free tube quality videos |
| Bottom Line: |
The only reason I joined is I'd seen a clip on a tube site and was interested in the female in the clip. I wasn't sure why the site made a big deal out of the guys being straight, but after watching you realize it's probably a site designed to appeal to gay men who might have some sort of fetish regarding women, or more specifically, men who are attracted to women, because you don't get to see much of the womens faces. There are a couple of attractive women on the site, but any action will be focused on the faces or bits of the males in the scene, many of which present themselves as liking other men more than the woman (to the point where they engage at times). The woman is a prop. One video is two "straight" guys having a bizarre threeway with a blowup doll, which might be the strangest premise that I've ever seen.
When you join there is a bonus pulldown at the top of the screen that directs you to a half dozen or so gay sites, so that helps support that this must be a gay fetish site.
Not a lot of pretty is the nicest way to describe the style of the actors, sets, and filming. My best attempt to ask you to imagine lots of early 1990s punk rock cosplayers as filtered through an eastern European nation except it's probably Portland. Many of the locations have junk on the floor or stacked in the room where it's being filmed, and there are often sheets or blankets over the windows. It helps with the cosplay punk rock feel I guess, but it's kind of depressing, especially when combined with poor lighting and cinematography and grainy video.
I've already covered how there's not a lot of focus on the ladies, but the part I wasn't expecting was that the paid video quality appears to be the same as tube site quality. The oldest videos show 320x240, and it looks as terrible as you'd imagine. With others that look a bit better than early 2000s clips, the video resolution in VLC it shows 720x480. There are no other download options, so that seems to be the only resolution available. Some of the older videos show 960x540, but visually there is no difference between the two. There's a big size difference, though. (100mb vs 500mb)
I compared it to the lower quality but still okay looking non-hd videos at a few other sites:
Teamskeet "high" 1024x576
adulttime 960x544
The adulttime is the one that is puzzling because it's still very watchable (as is the teamskeet clip). I guess it's camera differences, or maybe it's filmed in HD and re-encoded into lower resolutions, but these look night and day in comparison to the ones on this site. Like I said, the videos look like what you'd find on free tube sites. I couldn't find any resolution options.
One more notes regarding the speed: More than once I saw a file that was smaller than 100mb take two minutes to download.
I could see this appealing to a very specialized niche, but unless you've read this and thought "Oh yeah, that's my thing" then you might be disappointed. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
