It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some.
Bottom Line:
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very good site that shows one fetish leads to another then another.
The female models are very attractive and were my initial interest in the site. The guys are pretty good, too, including some I have heard of which is unusual for me.
662 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Videos and photos and downloadable. Videos up to 4K.
Nice, sexy, sensual feeling to the scenes.
Most scenes are long at least 30 minutes.
Cons:
The older scenes do not have the high-quality videos or photos.
The name could hurt the site, it’s a lot more than foot fetish.
Bottom Line:
I don’t really have any set fetishes I adhere to. I just like fetishes. The flow of fetishes usually finds at least one or two I like in each scene. The foot fetish is not one I’m very familiar with as far as in practice of. I don’t see me offering to give a guy a footjob. Most of the scenes get that action in each scene, but that leads to that flow I talked about. There are blowjobs, vaginal, anal, and that is for me, a good, broad-reaching fetish site. It had its basis fetish with foot but doesn’t stay there. That could be a con for some.
The size of the site is a bonus. Unless you have a problem with lower video quality. The oldest scenes are from 2005 and those only have up to 540p downloads. One thing I want to mention is the high quality of not only the newer scenes videos, but also of the picture sets. As someone that started my interest in online porn through Nubiles, I am used to having high quality videos and photo sets. This site’s photo sets have 150-200 photos in each. The photos sets can be downloaded in zips and the newer ones have photos that are 6700x4200 resolution and crystal clear besides the occasional blurry out of focus shot. The newer videos have all the download resolutions from 160p to 4K. There is a glamourous feeling to this site, and I believe the sensual nature of the foot fetish makes that happen.
The scenes are lacking in the story department, but it’s not hard to create stories in your head for these scenes. You have to think if a woman is willing to wrap her feet around a guy’s dick, that’s the story! It is the secretive advantage of fetish content. The males and female seem to really be into this fetish.
I really like this site and am surprised I am just now discovering it. I may have to look more into this foot fetish content. It seems it sets a softer, gentler tone to the scenes. Maybe it’s because the women are in more control, even? That is not to say this is softcore. Some of these scenes are as hardcore as the anal-fetish sites are. Even at that, some of the scenes, around 70, have anal in them. This fetish is being used properly and well. It’s giving me a reason to believe these actors and actresses are so turned on by exploring their foot fetish, it is lowering their inhibitions towards other fetishes. Not being a fetishist, but knowing fetishists, that does seem to be the real-life appeal of fetishes. The models are also a major bonus. I would recommend the site without hesitation. It covers nearly all major niches thanks to starting each scene with something as unattractive and useless (except for walking) foot. Very enjoyable and entertaining site with impressive quality.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s a little bit kinky and heavy on the fetishes.
- Contrary to the TBP facts and most recent review, all scenes, on this site, are downloadable with an Adult Prime membership. The TBP page has the streaming-only warning.
- It’s a smaller site (and they have possibly gave up on it) so it’s not very big but they are showing they are covering some very popular fetishes.
- They have 45 scenes and all can be downloaded in 4K.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max now that I know my speed has been upgraded).
- Navigation on the site itself is easy.
- It is part of the Adult Prime network that I have been a member of for over 6 months. This network really needs to be noticed. It is very good.
- Explicit fetish content. I will go into that in the bottom line.
Cons:
- It’s not currently updating. I hadn’t looked at the site in awhile. I was planning on reviewing the network itself but we have a couple of newer reviews on it. I noticed this site hadn’t been reviewed. It looks the site is probably dead. It’s still worth knowing about if you join the network. Don’t look over it like I have.
- Fetish content has the same weaknesses as it has strengths. There will be fetishes here you do not like. There will be some you do.
Bottom Line:
I wanted to review the entire network as I believe it has been looked over. Even the TBP review gave the network a 94. I do think people probably see the name and maybe expect it to not be as good as it is. I admit, the first time I joined it, it was just to see if it was a knockoff of Adult Time. It is called Adult Prime. It’s not at all a knockoff.
Fetish Prime is a site that shows various fetishes. I believe it’s a really good idea after years of just seeing sites that focus on one fetish but I’m not a strict fetishist. For all I know, those that like Pissing porn, may hate anything except Pissing porn. Having the different fetishes is a good idea to me. The site does not look like it is active. It hasn’t updated in 7 months. You do get 45 scenes with it and if you join the Adult Prime network, these are pretty much like bonus scenes to their bigger sites. Here are some of the fetishes the site covers: Pissing, Rimming (mostly of men, by women), tickling/feet fetish, the one I’ve seen too much is gyno with the speculum, it has ass/pussy worship combined with smothering (I liked that one more than I thought I would), it has spanking (not enough) and I will mention the tickling is mostly new to me even though I have joined a lot of leg and foot fetish sites. Those scenes are kind of funny and I will say, unusual for porn. I can’t say I have ever seen an 8 minute scene of a man tickling a woman. There is no nudity. He tickles her sides and her feet and it says she has an orgasm. She does a good enough job of selling the orgasm but that’s just something I didn’t even know existed. I was thinking tickling would focus on the foot and taking her clothes off as he worked his way up. But no. He tickles her feet and passes by her tight shorts that I want to see her out of and starts ticking her sides. We’ve run out of sex positions. This day had to come. I’m mostly just trying to share this experience because I really don’t think I’ve ever seen this. Keep that in mind, it’s worth checking that out possibly for personal use. If I tickled my wife like that she would probably pee everywhere and see, you all missed the boat on that one. You could have turned that into a pissing scene too.
I mentioned in the pros that the TBP review has the streaming-only warning on it. It is an older review. The scenes are downloadable now in 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. That could be helpful for someone out there that is into fetish porn. I don’t consider myself a fetishist like most people that are into fetishes. Most of mine revolve around clothing and the removal of that clothing or the teasing of removal. I think that gives me a broad perspective here since I am not locked into any of these fetishes. I have seen the speculum/gyno way too much. That’s probably ALS Scan, Give Me Pink and even In the Crack’s fault. I have noticed how explicit these scenes are. The pissing ones they are pissing water hose level on each other and in each other’s mouth. The spanking is probably the closest I will get to one that I have some experience with. I won’t say if I mean in life or watching porn or both. The spanking is relatively hard. They do use the softer flails and some use their hand. At least one uses a paddle and that one is a hard spanking.
If I found something that I believe hurts fetish porn it is that a lot of the scenes forget it’s porn. It’s more like they are showing you the fetish. I will use the spanking as an example. The scenes are just the man spanking the woman. You do get more nudity from the woman but there’s not much sex of any kind. I would guess that there’s a group that just wants to see the fetish and to hell with that sex part. I did want to mention that a lot of these scenes do not have sex in them. That’s probably why I liked the ass/pussy worship in the smothering scenes.
I usually would not score a site based on its network and won’t fully with this one either but part of my score is the included network. They have an interesting newer site that plays into the “fantasy” world. I’m not talking about the fantasies in your brain. I’m talking about Conan the Barbarian and Game of Thrones. Frank Frazetta art. I would have reviewed it but it only has 8 scenes on it so far. It is something those that are into the fantasy world type scenes may look into as it grows. It’s called Fixxxion. I think this review of Fetish Prime if nothing else updates that it does have downloads and the content is very much directed at those with the fetishes. If I was reviewing Adult Prime it would be up in the 93-96 area. I’m giving this one a 90 for being faithful to the fetishes and coming with the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Great download speeds that are at my maximum.
Comes with 23 high quality interracial sites on the Dogfart Network
The combination of two unusual niches, interracial porn and foot porn makes for a rare, maybe even unique site.
Uses Epoch as a biller and you can pay with Paypal, as well as any of 100 gift cards.
Easy site navigation and excellent download speeds.
PU has a discount
Cons:
A small site with only 56 updates.
4K costs extra per scene.
Bottom Line:
We on Pornusers have very few reviews for foot focused porn sites. The scenes have a variety of sex acts, including oral, vaginal and anal. However, the scenes use the female model’s feet for foreplay, as a break from other sex acts, as well as for the cumshots.
The scenarios vary and use themes that are common on other pornsites. A good example is a recent update where a mother, Kay Carter, and her stepdaughter Percy Sires, are the female talent. The mother teaches her stepdaughter how to be sexy with her feet. The male stars are black and well hung, of course. Prince Yashua is one of the most prolific of male black pornstars and he is accompanied by Donny Sins as the recipients of the female attention. The premise here is that the stepdaughter got into a car accident and does not have the money to pay for the repairs to the other car. Her stepmother makes a deal for foot sex in this fantasy scene.
This site has many big name American pornstars such as Aidra Fox, Kenzie Reeves, Shona River, Brooklyn Chase, Riley Reid, Casey Calvert, Veruca James, Chastity Lynn, Kagney Lynn Karter, Eva Angelina, Remy LaCroix, Darcy Tyler, and Giselle Leon. The male models are some of the best black male stars in the business. Leading the group is Rico Strong with 11 scenes, Brian Pumper with 9, JonJon with 8, and Prince Yashua with 6. All of them are simply huge down there and the contrast in color with the white models is striking.
The video download choices are Full HD 1920x1080, 10,000 kbps and 30 frames per second, HD 1280x720 4600 kbps and 30 frames per second, Medium at 768x432 and Small at 688x384. Despite 4K being mentioned in other reviews as available for an extra fee, I saw no mention of this on the site. A recent photoset had 243 photos, 3000x2003 and there is a mix of portrait photos and landscape screenshots.
One criticism I feel is valid is that there are only 56 videos, despite the fact that the site has existed since 2011. That is not much for a ten year old site. In the past few years, it has hardly updated at all. So far in 2021 there are only two. In all of 2020 there were only four. Often sites die and go archive when models are difficult to find. I am no expert, but I can’t imagine models being unwilling to do a site that focuses on feet. The scenes are pretty much sex that you find on most sites and are not extreme. This is far from circus porn that would wear out a female model.
The site navigation is easy and is very logical. You can search by model, by site, by network or by tags. I found the download speeds to be at about the maximum my computer is capable of.
Pornusers has a discount for a monthly join. Epoch is the biller and it is one of the best you can use. Through them, you can pay with Paypal, as well as using your choice of about 100 gift cards.
Between a nice discount and the network having a huge archive, I recommend that this site is worth checking out if you are into feet as sex objects.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Pornusers discount of only $12.95 for a month
Top quality production values with 240 scenes and about six updates per month.
Easy search function
Every model has perfect feet and pedicures
Models are all well known Americans who are stunningly beautiful
Download quality as high as 4K
Cons:
I would like more than 6 new updates per month or a bigger archive.
If you're not into foot fetishes you probably won't like this site as much as I do.
Bottom Line:
The director is Andrew Youngman who has directed 1000’s of porn movies over the past 20 years. He is one of the few porn directors I follow the content of. His dream was to make the best porn foot fetish site in the world. He tries to get every camera angle as strategically chosen to make for the best scene possible. Every frame of every scene has the feet as the focus. The production values are beautiful as you see an attention to detail that is highly uncommon in porn.
There are models who wear pantyhose, stockings and heels and their legs look invitingly fantastic. In every scene there is a different premise. Sometimes it is family like stepsister and brother, in other scenes it may be older younger, or power differences like attorney and client or tutor and student. In every scene the man is so turned on by her feet that he literally cannot help but get carried away. There is plenty of toe sucking to be sure, but there are also plenty of footjobs where her feet massage his cock. In every scene the sex comes next and the heat from the foot foreplay builds to a climax. The action flows naturally as for example in a scene where he rubs his dick on her feet and then she is inspired to give him a footjob. He comes on her feet with a nice cumshot visual that I really like. In some scenes she licks his cum off her feet. It does not get any better than that. I saw an awe inspiring hot scene where a foot job lead to a blowjob. In another he is fucking her face and she offers him her feet to suck on. He goes back and forth. If I can imagine a foot scene, it probably is on this site.
Many of the tags are designed for a foot site. Where else do you see a tag for nail polish color or size of her feet? The site is very easy to use and the downloads were fast. You can even get the scenes in 4K. The models are well known Americans who have made many scenes before. I suspect that many have not done foot fetish videos though. The attractiveness of the models is a given and there is a nice level of racial variety too. I love foot fetish videos and I feel this Is my new favorite site. Even better is that the price is only $13 for a month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent site functionality (including mobile) makes it easy and quick to locate and watch scenes.
Scenes have linked categories such as anal, MILF, etc.
Paged scene listing provides complete scene info and provides all functionality for each scene: stream and download the scene, view and download photos, watch scene trailer and BTS footage, link to model info page, link to other scenes featuring a selected linked category, all from the scene listing and without having to jump to a scene detail page.
Can add scene to favourites, rate and leave comments for each scene.
Model index can be sorted and filtered by name and rating and shows number of scenes for model.
Variety of download sizes including 4K, 1080p and 720p HD formats and 480p SD format.
Good download speeds.
Responsive customer service.
Works with download managers.
Includes DogFart network content.
Epoch biller means sign-up is safe and easy.
Cons:
No detailed model info - model page only lists scenes.
Infrequent updates.
4K downloads are charged per scene.
Not all scenes are hardcore.
Live cams sidebar affects page loading performance.
Downloaded video file sizes are excessive for 1080p and 480p content.
Older scenes are listed as HD when they're really only 480p SD.
Download filenames aren't unique so there's a chance you might overwrite a previously downloaded scene.
Can't resume downloads from a previous session.
Bottom Line:
Features 54 scenes featuring US models with content dating back to June 2011 and updating every 3 months.
-Scenes last between 20 and 40 minutes and feature attractive women in hardcore action with one or more BBCs. There's no storyline to speak of, just the girl getting it on with one or more BBC, with some scenes featuring hardcore sex and others just the girl sucking and playing with the BBC. Scenes end with the guy cumming on the girl's feet after a foot job. Some of the hardcore scenes feature anal but not many.
-Scenes are good production quality with decent camera angles, though at 10Mbps encoding for the 1080p content, download file sizes are 25% larger than they need to be. Despite being labelled as such, HD MED and HD SMALL isn't HD at all but is 768x432at bit rates 1500Kbps and 800Kbps, though HD BIG is 1280x720 at 3Mbps which I guess is HD, just not full HD.
-The web site is very functional and quite responsive on both normal and mobile sites. The design of the scene listing/updates page is a departure from the usual convention of lots of scene thumbnails (each with minimum scene info) per page, requiring you to click the thumbnail or scene title to view the scene on a separate scene detail page. Instead this site shows all the scene info with a large scene preview image per scene, with the ability to stream and download the scene, all from the scene listing page, which arguably means less mouse-clicks and waiting for pages to load when you're browsing the content. The trade-off is that there are only 5 scenes per page.
Personally I prefer this design over the usual, as I tend to flick through every page of site updates from start to end, and having a large scene photo plus being able to stream the scene trailer (or the whole scene) at various resolutions is much quicker than otherwise. I also very much like that the list of scene names/models is presented as a drop down list from which you can jump to a selected scene. You can also jump to a specific page number in the scene updates listings by selecting the desired page number from a drop-down list.
You can also filter scenes by one or more categories but this works across the network rather than just this site.
Scenes can be listed by date order or rating order.
-Each scene listing provides complete scene info and provides lots of functionality: add to favourites, stream in-place or in a new window, download scene, stream trailer, watch behind the scenes video, view and download photos, link to other scenes sharing linked categories, link to model info page, rate scene and leave comments - all whilst browsing the scene listing and without having to jump to a scene detail page.
Scene info includes model name/title, release date, rating, duration, complete scene cast, applicable (and linked) categories and scene description/storyline.
-Login sessions last for as long as the browser window is open - if you're downloading scenes and you close your browser (but leave your DL manager open) it's very likely your current and pending downloads will fail. Because a unique session id is part of the site URL, you can't close your browser and resume downloads in a later new login session as the site URL will have changed and the download URL will be invalid, so make sure you finish downloading before closing your browser window/tab that's open on this site.
-Photosets are presented as a gallery or can be downloaded as a ZIP file. The gallery presents pics as a paged list of thumbnails, clicking on one zooms to full page size, from which you can navigate back and forth, open the pic in a new in a new window or - rather amusingly - send the pic to Twitter!
The photos are 3000x2000 resolution though older scenes are 1600x1067.
-Whilst the design of this site is refreshing and fairly responsive, the main negative is the chat sidebar which slows down the loading of each page whilst it links to the DogFart Live camming site, which despite the title, doesn't provide access to DogFart stars.
-Despite the limited content and infrequent updates, I still think this site is worth joining, mainly thanks to the inclusion of much more IR content from Dogfart network, but if you like seeing guys cum on girls feet then you'll enjoy it even more.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The genre-defining site for legs and foot fetishist in an equally as impressive network.
An incredible 2,789 scenes. The updates have slowed to 1-2 per month, but this site is 3-4 times bigger than the other foot fetish sites.
Different from Footsie Babes, Hot Legs and Feet has as many lesbian scenes as male/female scenes and Hot Legs and Feet has more hose, stocking and pants used in their scenes than Footsie Babes.
The oldest scenes are from 2001. I was not legal age in 2001.
Features the top models out of Europe. Photos are studio photo set quality, not screencaps.
Cons:
An advantage Footsie Babes has is they use the same men in different scenes, most of them are obvious foot fetishists. DDF's guys are good, but not quite as believable. Hot Legs and Feet makes up for it with the lesbian scenes. There is an added level of sensuality when it is two women.
All good things come to an end -- at nearly 3,000 scenes with sparse updates, it looks like Hot Legs and Feet might be nearing their end.
Bottom Line:
If I was to pick two sites or networks to score highest they would be Kink and DDF. The network included with Hot Legs and Feet is one of the best and most diverse networks.
Hot Legs and Feet is the best site for reverse foot fetishists. The women here do a good job of acting like their feet and legs are not a big deal. The men and women show them their legs and feet are a big deal. I do not feel a lot of sensuality in porn or get the erotic feeling from most porn. This site does both or maybe it is a combination of them.
The use of fishnet hose to showcase the woman's toes, thighs and vagina creates a visual relation between points of sexual interest. Their scenes with stuck stockings becoming impossible to remove while having sex show a precursor to harder bondage acts. It hints at artsy with the struggling female trying to enjoy the sex while fighting her bound hosiery.
There are scenes with the added bonus of the models removing their hose only to wrap them around the man's penis. Is she doing it to to let him feel her silky hose or to hold onto him and not let him get away?
There are enough scenes here to come up with your own conclusions. With nearly 3,000 scenes including a video and picture set each, there is little to no competition for them in terms of quality and quantity.
If you use their tag system you see they have nearly 900 scenes with stockings, hose or leggings in them. Those outnumber the next biggest foot fetish sites in total content. Someone might ask why not join a site with stockings, hose and leggings as their focus; those sites are usually tease sites.
The tagging system works very accurately. I do wish I could use multiple tags to search, but either it doesn't work or they don't have any scenes with mini-skirt, fishnet and handjob.
The most recent 90-100 videos have 4K option. The 1,000 before those have 1080p option and the ones before those have 720p option to download.
If you are into the legs, feet, hose, leggings niches, 1 By Day and House of Taboo mix those in on a regular basis. It is for me the best of the foot fetish sites and a network worth keeping a long-term membership to.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A big foot fetish site with an emphasis on regular foot fetish -- meaning the male and sometimes or female enjoy kissing, touching and licking her feet.
They have 618 scenes, each scene has a photo set and video. They add 1 new scene per week.
Includes access to Adult Time, it changes the original navigation and feel of the site, but works without any major differences or problems.
Someone at the site has a good, working knowledge of foot fetishism. There aren't a lot of male talents used on this site, but the ones that are seem to be real foot fetishists.
High production values for a fetish site.
Cons:
General lack of reverse foot fetish content -- meaning the woman whose feet and legs are being licked, kissed and caressed is only aroused by being the one having it done to her. The women in the scenes seem to be as much into their feet as the men are.
Even as a reverse foot fetishist, I recognize the redundancy of a niche like this one.
I would be happier with it if they focused more on the legs and feet with clothing choices (hose, stockings and leggings) instead of having most of the newer scenes focusing on the bare feet and legs.
Bottom Line:
Foot fetishists are viewed as strange. People generally believe a foot fetishist is someone that walks around with toes on their breath. A foot fetishist doesn't even have to include the feet. It can be the gait of a woman's walk that starts the attraction to her legs and on down, instead of on up.
The newer scenes are disappointing to me. They are shot from an already ready view. The woman is usually already out of her hose or stockings or leggings. A body part fetish -- in my opinion -- should focus on that body part and include what would be called "worship".
The worship here is relegated to kissing, licking, sucking on feet, legs and toes. Did they run out of fishnet stockings? Tight leggings that seduce the man from her ankles up to her knees and back down? It might sound like these are not legitimate negatives, but in a fetish of a body part, that body part should be the most wanted by the person fulfilling the fetish.
They do seem to put a lot of work, time and even money into the scenes, but they have also fallen into the "if ain't broke" mantra. I am sure there are foot fetishist that are happy with that. It just does not appeal as much to a reverse foot fetishist.
The producers of this site -- 21 Sextury -- also have the site 21 Foot Art. It has more content for reverse foot fetishists. This site is a good site for foot lovers. I have heard a lot of male foot fetishists love to see the woman alternate sucking on her own toes and the guy's penis. They feature that "position" in a lot of their scenes. I am surprised they don't have a category for it.
Four of the male actors are prominently featured on foot fetish sites -- Charlie Dean, Toby, Kristof Cale and Vince Carter. This is one niche that requires the male to do more than get it up, stick it in, last 20 minutes and give a good ejaculation. They have to be able to focus on the feet, legs and toes while doing all those other parts.
The female models are mostly very pretty, European and do at least enjoy having their feet kissed and licked. As someone that discovered their own interest in this niche, I sometimes wonder about he female model's enjoyment and real interest in the fetish. I am saying this is one time I would like to see the female models talk about which parts (toe licking/sucking, sole licking, entire leg licking) turns them on most, but their inability to speak English limits that interaction.
Minor improvements are needed, but most of those are subjective. It would rate a little higher if they relied more on clothes than shoes/strap sandals. It's a very good deal within an Adult Time membership.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- mobile site worked well on my iphone
- all content is exclusive
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well.
- All interracial.
- Still updating
- shoots can be rated and favourited
- Stand out talents include RILEY REID (is she even capable of shooting a bad scene!?), Kate England, Edyn Blair (who manages and an anal scene in a foot fetish site).
- most scenes end with cum play (on the feet; no surprise. Not unusual to then lick it off)
- Focus on feet is apparent. The cameraman seldom takes eyes off the model's legs & feet
Cons:
- Only updates a few times a year. In all of 2018 there were only four updates. Sometimes there as long as 6 months between updates.
- Not enough updates. With less than 50 total updates it's hard to justify the high price of this site (unless you're looking for the entire network)
- the scenes feel repetitive because it is almost always the same basic set up. Although I was pleasantly surprised that there was hardcore action on top of the foot fetish
- Older content maxes out at a resolution of 640X480 3.2 mbps.
- Every shoot seems to end with a bukkake (maybe that's a plus?). To me, I like my porn to be varied. I prefer to not have the action move in predictable ways.
- The picture downloads are mostly screenshots of the shoot. (However the newer stuff has the model holding posterboard of a hot message or two - some are witty and fun)
Bottom Line:
While I don't have a foot fetish I thought I could give an objective review of this site. (So if this is your kink you may want to take my review with a grain of salt) I've enjoyed the rest of the network for the last three month and will reup for at least another 3 months.
I really appreciate the way the book top-notch talent. While they have a small catalogue ever model is a home run.
I also like the way they tease who is coming next. For example one of the next upcomers is BANDI LOVE (another one that can do no wrong in my opinion).
The biggest reasons for the low score on this site is the lack of updates and the lack of an extensive catalogue. I might be able to forgive one - but not both.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Unique focus. I know there are foot fetish sites out there but most are amateur sites that don't bring all the weight kink.com can bring.
- Lots of model diversity: Pregnancy, interracial, female-female, male-female.
- great imagination: everything for kinky nuns to squirting strippers. I like the unpredictability of what the next update might have brought.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Lots of my favorite fetish models have shot here - plus a good mix of up and comers. Penny Paz and Christy Mack were smoking hot.
- Allows download managers
Cons:
- Defunct site. Last update was March of 2015
- Just over 100 scenes
- Foot insertions were a turn off for me. But I can't complain too much it's a foot fetish site.
- Organization is hurting. Shoots are uploaded chronologically, while there are keywords they're misapplied and overly broad (bare pussy for example). You can search by model but if you don't know what you're looking for you have a hard time finding it.
No way to "favorite" things for future viewing
Bottom Line:
I'm not a foot fetish guy but there was still enough her for me to enjoy. Lots of different set-ups and model types kept things interesting. Part of what kept it's score down was the lack of content, no longer updating, and being too far out of the mainstream for me (I wrestled with that after all it is a foot site in a network named kink - but all the foot insertions were too much for me)
Had the site kept updating and had they been a little more sparing with the insertions I probably would have scored this site closer to a 90.
Streaming and multiple formats keep things simple.
The price is too high for just this site. That said if you are into kinky stuff this network is a gold mine. There's so much here it's certainly worth a months membership to explore. I intended to join for just a month but stayed longer and will return later now that my membership has lapsed
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An often overlooked site that's genre could also cause it to be looked over.
- Despite now being a network site it still delivers 4 updates per week (pictures/videos) in each.
- Has a huge catalog of content, over 2,500 scenes.
- A strong pro for me is it has the foot and leg fetishes involved, but there's also plenty of sex, pretty posing and everything you'd expect from a hardcore site not a foot/leg fetish site.
- Very good quality videos, 1080p videos date back to 2010-2011 and are still in every update.
- Photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes, topping out at 2000 long end and have been and still are some of the best photos you'll see.
- Has the added bonus of being in a network that covers nearly all genres.
- Download speeds are above-average and consistent.
- Navigation is as good as you'll find on a network, though you'll still run into the occasional glitch.
- Archive dates back to 2001, you'll find nearly every top Euro model on this site.
Cons:
- The price without the TBP/PU discount
- Fetish content always carries the potential of being repetitive.
- A small percentage of the foot/leg scenes won't go beyond foot teasing, leg flirting, etc...
Bottom Line:
Way back in the old says of online porn (early 2000s to mid 2000s), DDF sold this as a standalone site and it cost a premium price, seems like $30 back then per month.
Things have changed. I think it's both a good thing and a bad thing in this case. It's easy to see how someone would avoid this site since they might think it's a lot of toe worshiping, toe-sucking and so on. I'll say ahead of time, I'm not into feet, but this is one of my all-time favorite sites. I've always liked hose, fishnets on women and there's all kinds of those scenes on this site.
There's plenty of hardcore here as well as lesbian action. There's a smaller amount of solo and and even smaller amount of tease/very softcore.
The models, as with most Euro sites, are almost always very pretty ... at worst. DDF's sites aren't quite as glam as they used to be and that's now a plus for me. It used to would have been a negative.
The amount of content competes well with almost any 100% exclusive site. Over 2,500 videos, over 2,500 photo sets and the videos have the 1080p option and have for the last 5-6 years.
So, why should someone join it if they're not into feet and/or legs? Simple. The leg and feet category was one that Viv Thomas, DDF and Fred the photographer excelled at. The focus though isn't just on the feet and legs. It's on the panties slipping down the legs then off the feet. It's sensual in ways most porn these days can't even touch. Nothing in these scenes seems hurried. Could be two women in a pool, teasing each other with their toes, which leads to the panties sliding down, which leads to rubbing their legs together, touching, kissing, and finally what looks like believable out of control sex.
The solo scenes offer similar as well. You'll have a solo model teasing the camera, rubbing her own legs, rubbing her feet, panties start sliding and she goes into a wild masturbation.
The scenes with guys involved are also very good. Lots of teasing, fairly good chemistry between the guy and girl (also rare these days), there are footjobs, there are cumshots up legs, but it's still sex, just a little more sensual than we're used to seeing on most mainstream sites.
I would even say I would join it by itself without the network for a month. One of my favorite parts about their videos is they don't go overboard with the bit stream of the videos. A 25 minute 1080p video will be around 1.5 GB instead of the 3-4 GB you see on a lot of sites. I know that's a preference, but I really can't see enough difference between a 1080p video with 3,000 bitrate from one with 1080p with 10,000 bitrate, except in the time it takes to download and the space it takes up on my external hard drive.
I do think the pictures have taken a slight backseat to the quality they used to have on here, but from what I understand DDF is no longer the photographer, so it's to be expected.
The navigation on Hot Legs and Feet could be slightly better. We're getting into the area where less is more. There's 15 years of scenes on here. Just something to make it a little easier to find older scenes. I have trouble remembering all the different model names and end up trying to search through 127 pages of scenes. But maybe that's not a complaint? I was once told if I couldn't offer a fix then there's no reason to complain about it. I do believe their navigation is close to as good as you can get on a site like this one. My advice is to use the model list instead of trying to dig through 127 pages.
Last, the network that comes with this site has no less than 6 other sites I've joined in the past for $30 each. This is a really great deal for Euro-lovers especially. The only deductions I took off the score was for repetitiveness and the lack of adding anything new to the scenes. It was somewhat groundbreaking 15 years ago, but now it just looks like really high production quality porn. I've always believed the leg/feet sex sites were the precursors to today's heartcore sites. Definitely worth a join for anyone.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Unique content for those seeking lots of ass play without looking at any dicks. They get down to business. Kelsey, the main model is reasonably cute.
Cons:
Models numbers are very limited, and other than Kelsey, most are overweight and unattractive. Video composition is poor and shaky. The site has an archaic 3-tiered membership setup where you can buy an only-streaming membership, or a more expensive streaming membership, or just like the 1990's, you buy "tokens" to download. This isn't as simple as logging in and having easy access. When you buy the streaming +downloads membership, it will not allow download managers or downloading more than one video, and the page gets locked up for 5-10 minutes or longer while the one video spools and buffers to load up. The worst thing is all these levels of membership require a secondary authentication when you download - despite the fact that you logged in as a downloading member. The secondary authentication is touchy, and in 3 weeks I was only able to download 3 videos.
Bottom Line:
For an expensive ($40 per month)site, it is slow and frustrating to navigate - and impossible to download videos. For all this money the site should be easier to use, and not full of bugs and lock-ups of the site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+Exclusive content
+Large collection of photos and videos
+Quite a few "name" models who appear elsewhere
+Fast download speeds (1-1.5 Mbps)
+Zips of photos at 3000 pixels from 2008 to present
+Some zips of photos at 1500 pixels (earlier)
+Videos in wmv HD (1280x720), wmv standard (640x360), and MP4 (more recent); wmv standard for earlier; many videos stream also
+166 "hi def" videos are hardcore b/g or g/g videos; but there are lots more of interviews and solo footsie fun
+Allows use of download manager
+Foot fiend navigation niches: find only the stuff for dangling shoes, or tickling, or food, or another of many choices.
Cons:
-Navigation is too complicated; well, the site is too complicated, really
-Inconsistencies in video formats available even in the same part of the site history
-Quality of wmv "standard" videos not so good
-Photos in 1500 pixels not in zip files once they began offering "full scene" zips in Jan 2008
-They don't make it clear that the "full scene zipped photo sets" usually contain ALL of the photos of a model, even the ones that are shown in earlier sets such as "Meet" and "Living" and "Self-Sucking" and so on.
Bottom Line:
I'm not much of a foot fan, but overall I liked the content of this site. In fact, my hunt for nice pictures of girls showing their asses was my "sole" (a-hem) purpose in joining.
The photos from 2008 on are nice quality, if not super professional. There are plenty of hot models (Veronica Rodriquez, Ashley Jane, Jynx Maze, Marlena, Sammi Rhodes, Elle Alexandra, Emma Mae, Georgia Jones, Nikki Brookes, etc.). And it's all exclusive material, and it goes all the way back to 2004. (Wow, the quality sure has improved since then!)
You can also watch interview videos of the girls telling you about their sexual experiences and turn-ons. Beyond that, well, you can watch a lot of them getting down to gentle foot-and-pussy play with another girl, and/or foot/pussy fucking with a hardened male.
But there are problems with consistency in the offerings and with how things are presented. You can get hi def versions of many videos, but not all. You can get zips of some sizes of photos, but not all. You see the thumbs of only the hardcore photos, but actually the zip file has hundreds of photos that include the softcore and solo foot stuff of a model. You click the "Hi Def" movies link, but that's not all of the hi def movies. And the foot niches drop-down menu appears on some pages, but not on all of the pages you'd like it to. You may find yourself opening multiple tabs or windows just to keep part of the navigation at hand, which means that you're having to compensate for less-than-stellar web design. And in so doing, you'll wind up making the experience of the site more complicated.
About the complexity of the site, some may say that it just has a lot of navigation options, which can only be a good thing. After all, you can look at content that's only "Kick Ass Feet," or only "Flowers Exclusive," or only "Mark Archer Exclusive," or only "Barefoot Confidential." But do these terms mean anything to you? The term "exclusive" got me thinking they were different from what I was seeing on the page until I realized (by looking at the bottom of the page) that each entry is color-coded for these terms. Oh, well, now that's nice. Flowers is blue; Mark Archer is green; Kick Ass is pink; and Barefoot is purple. Well, I don't have to learn the color system, but I have wasted my time by wondering if I should.
Plus, there are 16 bonus sites included, but each one contains only 8 galleries and/or videos. Some are only videos ... And some are really old stuff (but not all). And you're given an offer in the bonus sites to join the "Kick Ass Network" for only $14.95. The "Kick Ass" bonus section includes that offer as well. So there's "Kick Ass" bonus and "Kick Ass" network and they're probably not the same thing. You know what? Fuck it.
I mean, I've already spent $30.
Anyway, I do recommend this site for its abundant quality exclusive content, but be forewarned that if you're not careful, the design and complexity could lead you to needless distraction.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the longest going sites in the DDF Prod network if not the longest one. The earliest scenes are dated January 2001 which is quite historic when it comes to internet porn
-Number of scenes going at nearly 2000 with your standard DDF Prod caveats of possible cross site content. However this site with it's clear niche is less likely to have content shared between sites and one can almost guarantee any footjob scenes are site exclusive
-Very strong approach on the subject again. Scenes may be solo, lesbian or hardcore but legs and feet are always in the focus of the action
-DDF understands that there should be multiple women in the same scene with a man. This is what 21Sextury.com could learn from
-Everything related to production and technical side is fine. Quality of photos, videos and sets in general is very high. Site works well with multiple download options, tagged searching is great too. Downloads are generally very fast and I repeatedly max out my bandwidth
Cons:
-Recycling. With this network it's hard to tell if material is new or old as scenes of all ages are added regularly and it's not uncommon to see a previously removed scene added again
-This is subjective but personally I'm not that much into feet and when it comes to legs, it's good enough that they look good. This site has many scenes where the only female part getting much action are the feet and they are nothing for me. However fans of the niche will 100% disagree
-Casting scenes that are of lower quality and not very interesting
Bottom Line:
Feet, legs, socks, pantyhose, stockings and some shoes and boots are the focus here. The rest varies as much as on all the DDF sites from solo girls to group hardcore action. This site has been going for a very long time and if the oldest scenes all the way from the early 2001 aren't worth much in their 320x240 video format, at least they have decent photosets with many legendary stars. Actually the very oldest ones have only photosets with the video starting few months later.
Even if one is not into the feet and legs in particular, this site offers lots of videos with enough normal sex to entertain non niche people. Due to the specific foot focus in those scenes too, they are more often site exclusive too and not found on other DDF Prod sites as often as ones on some other sites. DDF also does one thing right if one compares with the "main competitor" 21sextury.com, there are usually more women than men in the hardcore scenes. Of course there's lots of solo scenes too and many that feature maybe only short blowjob in addition to footjob so if those are your thing, you might like this site even more while for me they are just filler.
Quality of photography and video in newer scenes shines here too. The ones available in 1080p are generally very good but as they are updating also with older (sometimes recycled) material, you will see 720p too which is perhaps a bit smudgier than the new content but still nice. Photos are the subjective best in the business and available in three sizes in zips although I cannot see anyone really downloading anything but large size ones these days. The large photosets in zips are usually from few dozen to maybe fifty megabytes so no 600Mb monster zips here.
The talent is nothing new to the ones familiar with DDF and the other European sites. The names may vary from site to site but the girls are the same big Euro names of today and past years with some Americans thrown in between. In case anyone is interested, yes the guys are the same handful you have learned to tolerate on every site and film over past few decades ;)
Technical side is in good order and exactly the same as on the other network sites. After they did away with the individual site designs and interfaces, everything has been clearer and very easy to search. It's also easier to check if the content is duplicate or a re-edit of some other scene from another site. Downloads speeds are not maybe the most consistent I've experienced but generally fast enough to max out the fastest connections with a DL manager.
This site is another cornerstone of the DDF Prod network. Despite the topic, it has much to offer to users more interested in just plain action but also many 100% topic focused scenes.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons:
-- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line:
When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.
VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.
OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.
The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).
If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.
I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large collection of pictures and videos with beautiful women in nylons and high heels (few bare legs)
-Emphasis on legs/nylons/lingerie/high heels. Mainly solo girls.
-High quality videos.
-Models talk a lot during the videos.
-Beautiful lingerie, outfits and nylons on the models.
-The models keep their shoes on!
-Frequent updates (2 or video/picture updates per week)
-Fast downloads.
-Great selection of awesome shoes. Mainly platforms and high heels.
-Fairly priced.
-Easy site navigation and simple design.
-95% beautiful girls.
Cons:
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better all the time.
-The site limits the amount you can download in a day.
-Only two lesbian sets.
-No zip downloads.
Bottom Line:
-This is by far my favorite leg/nylon/high heel web site! I have belonged to Altaheels almost continuously since it started. It has practically every component of a leg site that I look for Super pretty girls with long legs, terrific outfits, fantastic stockings and pantyhose, amazing high heels. For you guys out there who like bare legs, there is some of this here too. Some unique things on this site:
-A bunch of sets with seamless pantyhose! These are always the best!
- Several sets of layered stockings over pantyhose. These are tremendous to us leg guys.
-Tons of different high heels. They range from 6 inch pumps to 8 inch platforms.
-A couple of shoots with some crazy high heels (with like 6 inch platforms and 12 inch heels)!!! I have never seen these kinds of shoes on any other site!!!
-Girls who talk or tell a story during the videos! These are very unique among all leg sites. There is nothing more of a turn on then to hear a girl talking to you; trying to turn you on, with nylons and heels? The best! I hate leg videos that just show a girls sitting there like a lump. I want to get to know her a little or just see that she is a real person.
-The overall size of the site content is great.
-The pictures are better than average quality, 700x1000 pixels, about 225 kb. Most sets have 30 to 60 pictures. For me, more important that the size of the pictures is the content.
-The video quality of the older stuff is average, but the newer videos appear to be getting much better. Most of the videos last 5 to 11 minutes.
-The price is a good value because of the content and frequent updates (24.95 for 30 days then 21.95 reoccurring every 30 days). I do see that they do split some of the content to other sites, but this is the one I really like to see.
-For me, the key to this site is the complete overall substance. Sure, blahblahblahlegs.com has a few prettier girls but ALTAHEELS has every girl in super high heels; blahblahblahnylons.net may have higher video quality but half the girls arent wearing nylons or lingerie; blahblahblahstockings.ru has nice outfits but the in the videos the girls cant speak English. I guess my point is that the pieces of the puzzle that I am looking for come together here.
BTW As I was writing this, I looked through my hard drive at some of the videos and there are a couple videos (sam_geo_001, heather202 and celeste_303) which alone would be reason enough to join! Absolutely mind-blowing for leg men!
-I give it a 96. I took some points off because of the download volume limiter and no zip files, but if you are a leg guy; you should definitely check it out.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Extremely large collection of pictures and videos. I mean, this site has been around forever.
- Caters to leg/nylon/high heel guys. Tons of content for leg-lovers.
-Frequent updates and new models (approximately 1-2 per week)
-High quality videos.
-The downloads come pretty fast (I dont know much about internet server speed but I would say it is somewhere between amazon and computer support site in India)
-Nice outfits and nylons on the models.
-Good selection of shoes. Nice platforms and high heels.
-Discounts on DVD purchases from their online store.
-Steaming video and live shows (available at certain times)
-Fairly inexpensive (about $30 per month) for the amount of content.
-Navigation of the site is easy and straight forward. I like sites that allow you to go right back to the home or updates pages without having to go through 50 pages first.
-Wide variety of girls (Caucasian, Black, Asian, Hispanic..Younger, little older)
-Approximately one lesbian scene a month.
Cons:
-A lot of the early stuff is so so quality and content.
-No zip downloads
-50% of the girls are good looking, 10% are much less. (Remember 40% are smoking hot)
-Way too many sets of JB himself in what he calls POV shoots. I am a leg man and I want to see hot girls in nylons! I just dont want to see a guys junk being jacked off by an Asian chick every forth photo set.
-Many of the videos just have a girl sitting on a bed or pole dancing in pantyhose. No talking at all. I just think videos that have the girl talk to you, interact with you.
-Some of the photo sets could be larger. They range from 40 to 80 pictures in a set.
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better every day.
-No model or content search engine. I would love to be able to search for seamless pantyhose or 2 girls in pantyhose on the site because of the large content.
-No rating system for pictures or videos.
Bottom Line:
-As any leg guy can tell you, JB Video is one of the oldest and often one of the first leg sites that most of us join (it was my first and I have re-joined dozens of times over the years). So in many ways I feel like I am reviewing the Eifel Tower. It is a great nylon/leg/high heel site with a monstrous collection of pictures and videos. Lots of hot girls in nylons and heels to please any leg guy. I would give it an 85 rating and say that if you love legs; you should join.
-A few suggestions:
-Too few sets with seamless pantyhose! As all us leg guys know; we search for seamless pantyhose sets like the Holy Grail.
-Too few sets of layered stockings over pantyhose. Again, super awesome but few and far between.
-One of the very few leg sites that have videos showing girls changing shoes. An excellent bonus!
-A couple of the DVDs for sale (like Sky and Summers Foot Tease, Foot Seduction 14 Goldie and Isabella and Foot Seduction 24 Emily and Darenzia and a couple of the other lesbian videos) are worth the price of admission alone. True masterpieces! There should be more lesbian sets like these! I love these videos because the girls are talking the whole time, talking about their legs and nylons.
-Pretty good shoe collection. Nice sets with 6 inch platforms. I would like to see a few sets with some 8 inch heels.
-Need to get rid of a lot of the less pretty girls.
-Way fewer of the POV sets of a guy getting a foot job from a girl. These arent very good and not very exciting.
I know a will be re-joining JB Video on a regular basis. A very solid leg site and a good value with a few kinks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Gorgeus European women
-Amazing foot fetish action (solo, g/g and some b/g)
-Really huge archive, updated every day (one day with a picture set, next day with the corresponding videos)
-Several video download options
-zip archives for pictures sets
-Part of the ddfprod network
Cons:
-Best days of this site are long gone
-If bought indepentently it's quite pricy
-Some "new" sets are just re-editions of older ones
-Older sets have not been improved since they first appeared and have quite low quality
Bottom Line:
Hot Legs and Feet continues to be my favorite foot fetish site, although I think that it's "golden days" are now over. I remember when I first joined, Sophie Moone was in her full splendor and making tons of videos for DDF; the same could be said about Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Sandra Shine... Now most of those models are retired, working for 21st Sextury or in the US, and the new models that have appeared since then don't have the same sex appeal or charisma. Or maybe it's just me...
In any case, this site works very well for someone who is looking for foot fetish action: it has quite a lot of solo sets; many girl/girl action sets, and quite a few boy/girl sets. It is updated very regularly (three new sets a week, consisting on pictures and video) and in its new sets it offers different download options and qualities. Only good things can be said about directing, lighting, editing, etc. None knows how to capture the beauty of female feet in action like these guys.
My last consideration is a quite obvious one: this site is included in the DDF Productions network deal, so if you are interested, I would recommend joining the whole network for a bit more money, because you will get access to other good sites too.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-254 scenes and updating regularly
-Close to 50 scenes in very good looking FullHD video, available in either wmv or H.264
-Lots of mainstream hardcore content in the scenes. A standard vanilla viewer could easily edit out the licking and footjobs and get great quality content while saving some disc space
-Not much softcore fooling around. Some but not in the latest scenes
-Hot girls in almost all scenes
-Some light BDSM in scenes every now and then
Cons:
-I end up with LOTS of broken video files. It's frustrating to have to reload two gigabyte files
-Photos could be larger
-Maybe I'm confusing niches here but I don't see many boots here. It's probably all about naked feet but I'd love to see some more boots and high heels thrown in
Bottom Line:
Normally I would skip a site with a name that's got anything to do with feet as they tend to be seriously focused in nature and you are lucky to see a glimpse of any real action or naked ladies.
This one however is a different thing and I'm happy that 21Sextury comes with a decent site in this fetish as this can really be enjoyed even if one doesn't give a damn about toes and feet. Sure, there is a lot of footjob going on and obligatory toe licking but once that is out of the way, you get good quality Euro action in extremely high production quality with the hottest girls around. This site works for me great, unlike HotLegsAndFeet for example.
I must remind that I don't really care about the subject in name so the rating could be way higher for those who've been desperately looking for foot action with real hardcore. For me it's great to notice that sites I wasn't really expecting anything from turn out quite good.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
07-23-1002:56am (Update History) Reason: This is a new review, I don't know why it was catalogued as "expired review"...
Pros:
-The archive is not huge, but big enough (248 scenes)
-Exclusive sets, mostly
-Gorgeus European models (including Sophie Moone, Blue Angel or Eve Angel)
-Excellent video quality and different download options
-Reasonable price: 19.95$ with the PU offer, and you also get this site in the 21st Sextury pack (which is probably the best option)
-Good artistic look in all the videos
-All-in-one zips for pictures
-Some variety in the type of sets: mostly solo and b/g sets, with some g/g
Cons:
-Only 1 update a week
-No bonus content
-The style in the videos is elegant, but a little repetitive at times
-Some models do not look like they are enjoying themselves too much
Bottom Line:
I was totally convinced that at some point I had made a review of this site, but apparently, I hadn't. So here I go. I was a member of this site some years ago, when it first opened and it worked as an individual site, and I am now a member again, thanks to the 21st Sextury pack offer. When it was just the one site, I remember that I used to get a little frustrated, because the updates were too slow (they used to "slice up" the sets through a whole week) and I didn't get any extra content. Now, with it being a part of this site-pack, it's easier to be patient and wait for the updates to come.
After visitting other few sites in this same niche, I think Footsie Babes is up there with Hot Legs and Feet and Foot Fetish Daily, as one of the top foot fetish sites available anywhere, probably in a close third place (HL&F being my absoluto favorite). It has classy and sexy models with beautiful feet, the quality of the videos is great, and the size of the archive is acceptable.
The bigger problem with this site, as with most 21st Sextury sites, is that it updates quite slowly (at least for my standards): just one update a week is not enough, and it can be really frustrating if you opt for a short membership and you don't like one or two of the last updates, for whatever reason.
And I have to say, that although it is difficult to say why, Footsiebabes tend to dissapoint me a little with their scenes. They have gorgeus models, they have good material, and yet, they tend not to hit the exact spot when dealing with foot worship, footjobs or foot fucking. I think the directors and editors should take a look at DDF and Kick Ass for inspiration on how to treat feet in a video, and also on how to set the appropriate mood for the scene... Anyway, I am well aware that this is just my personal taste, and other users may love the 21st Sextury way of doing foot fetish videos...
My bottom line, to sum up, is quite simple: I like this site, but I recommend getting access to it by getting the whole 21st Sextury pass, not as an individual site. If you are a foot fetish man like myself, you will enjoy it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons:
Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line:
If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Medium-big size archive
-Good video quality (not great in older videos)
-Cute girls, some classics like Cytherea, Sunrise Adams or Jewel Valmont aka Ava Vincent.
-Easy navigation (by model, by type of action, by date...)
-Different styles and types of foot action (hardcore, lesbian, solo, etc.)
-Regular updates (they really do come daily)
Cons:
-Very few download options
-Most models are just average, not ugly, not impressive
-A lot of the sets are solo action (Meet X, X self-sucking, X soles on glass, etc.)
-Best known actresses have very few sets or videos
-A bit high-priced (29.95$ a month) for this times of crisis.
Bottom Line:
I was really hoping this to be a great, great site like Hot Legs and Feet (my all time foot fetish favorite, as some people at PU may know). And it wasn't. Foot Fetish Daily is not bad, but it's not great either. It offers a good number of pics and videos, with some really hot girls like Daisy Marie or Nicole Ray, for example, but you also get a huge amount of solo sets with anonymous models whose name, face and body you probably forget the next minute.
On the pro side, Foot Fetish Daily gets you access to at least a part of the Kick Ass Video archive (the ones who make Barefoot Confidential, the longest running and most awarded foot fetish video series, if I am not mistaken).
I don't see FFD as a long membership kind of site, even if it is true that it is updated daily. Unless, that is, that you like foot fetish solo videos, which are not my cup of tea: in that case, this may be the perfect site for you...
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- tasteful stuff, videos and pictures
- good amount of stuff
- the "right" kinky viewing angles for nerds in pictures and videos
- mostly european-style, well-proportioned models
- site seems to update regularly
Cons:
- videos not in HD, video-quality varies according to release date
- picture resolution varies, not state of the art of today
- picture-sets not as zip-files
- explicit download-limit of 3 GB per day
- defacto download-limit is clearly much less and lesser, you download 10 or 12 videos and your account gets disabled, account then has to get reanimated by sending email to webmaster, this game repeats every day
Bottom Line:
Site has some good approach but needs to strain according to content quality and customer friendlyness.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The dude below me gave the stats so I will concentrate on content, service and overall 'delivery of goods'.
Excellent quality and fast download speeds(4MBit) 1280x720
Multi formats
Decent sets
Nut burstingly horny babes
Good support (now)
Good camera work
Classy and pro presentation
Exclusive content
'Casting' shorts are a great addition
Stockings (about fukin time)
Cons:
REGIONAL damn pricing
Not enough updates
Some 'movement' of content from other DDF sites and some recycled older low res quality, although both are not repeated content
Not enough ethnic babes
Too many solos and same 'format' dudes
Not enough location shoots although the shoots are classy
Older films are low res and many models not repeated again
Bottom Line:
If you're into legs n shit, like I am, then this site is the leader in it's genre/field.
Stunning babes wearing hot gear in cool locations and emphasis being on feet and legs they do not disappoint.
The exclusive content is one of it's attractions. You will get the odd 'known' babe but the scenes are still exclusive.
I could do with more variety in terms of ethnic babes, guys who don't 'machine-gun' rump the babes as sometimes it's nice to 'see' the sex, maybe some better location shoots and re-introduction of babes from their back catalogue would be a winner.
The regional pricing stinks and I for one am really fukin sick of this shit. You can't call a 'small person' a midget any more unless you want your nuts torched and your house sold in compensation, but you can charge what the fuk you like when it comes to us in the UK.
I love this site but due to their slow updates and regional pricing it's not one I would stay a member of on a monthly and regular basis.
I also believe, much like other 'umbrella' sites, that there should be a discounted membership for those who want to sign up to all the DDF sites. It makes sense and keeps the variety and update aspect manageable.
Had it not been for the updates and regional pricing practices I would have thrown a few more points on the overall score. And until sites realise that we ARE their income streams and they stop treating us as if they are doing us favours then maybe the scores would grow and sites would establish a long and loyal paying customer base.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- as of today: pics come in 2000x 1331 or 1331x2000.
- Videos: Good looking 1280x720 4162kbps Wmv. Downloads in: Dvix; mpg; quicktime, and Wmv in hi resolution -as stated above- and in a nice 852x480 2000kbps. New videos weigh around 500-800 mb's.
- Due to their camerawork we get to watch female legs in rather pleasing perspectives, thus, enhancing their appeal.
-boy vs girls scenes of: Aneta keys with his boyfriend, i believe, a rather ugly guy, this one comes in 704x396 2500kbps ; Sophie Moon, this one comes in 704x528 2650kbps, what a treat is to watch this women in a b/g scene!
-The girls are not loud and are very skilled teasers. male talen't don't batter the women.
- Very good customer support, although they could even reply faster to e-mails.
- Vids of stunning women such as: Zuzana Drabinova; Veronica De Souza, two of them riveting on account of being recent, and therefore looking great; Ines Cudna, Verona aka veronica fasterova; Susana Spears; Maya, LEA TYRON, GOOGLE HER!
Cons:
-Disgusting regional pricing. They apply double standards when it comes to billing their members. i took that into account when i scored the site.
- Videos prior to 2007 don't look good.
-Pictures and videos watermarked.
- Some of the models look downright bored. i assume that the notion of men aroused watching them rubbing their feet bores them stiff.
- they should revamp the quality of their older videos since the models are amazing.
-Downloads didn't come fast for me.
Bottom Line:
- if you're a leg man or you like good looking women you can't miss this site. Barring their freaking regional-pricing practices the site is next to perfect.
-You can add to the above list of stunning models: Monica Sweetheart; Merylin Sekova; Silvia saint (three episodes); Simony Diamond in boy/girl scenes; Regina Ice; Peaches, Kathia Nobili and the list goes on.
-i'd like to add that there are a ton of girl/girl scenes.
- you can stream the vids.
- this is a pro i couldn't add above: to the best of my knowledge, there are no DL limits and i belive that you can use a DL manager if you so choose.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
