Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Award winning porn for women. That's what the main page says.
Implies the stories in the scenes were written by professional erotica authors.
This should be a con, but I am going to give them credit for doing a great job of marketing what is a poor to mediocre site.
I believe there is a market for this type of "female-aimed" porn, it's just not for me.
Cons:
Has not updated in years. The site itself does not look modern either.
Boring content that is just not erotic enough
Very little if any HD content. The photo sets are also low quality and do not even zip downloads.
Not a big name biller.
The site is hard to use as it has folders inside folders to find only low quality inside.
Bottom Line:
I am very interested in the niche of porn for women. I never knew that back in 1999, there was a site dedicated to what us girls want to see. So I took the plunge and joined. The site was only $4.95 so I figured I did not have much to lose by checking it out.
In the more than 20 years since this site opened, there have been two major changes. One is that women have become more assertive sexually and we know what we want and how we want it. The other change is in the world of porn. It is now so readily available that we have choices. When this site was started this was it. For women we have seen a lessening of the stigma there once was when we admitted to liking porn. To a degree porn itself has evolved, just not enough. One day there will be better choices but modern porn is still a man’s world.
For me this was a history lesson, a peek into the world of sexual entertainment of a different time and a different place. The founder was a woman. Looking at it now, she made a site that seems to represent stereotypes of what women need. There is a large emphasis on sexy stories, shopping and makeup. That may be fine for some, but it is not me in 2020. I think she made a site that she would like. It did not work for many of us and it abruptly ended in about 2015 as a failed experiment. It even comes off as more of a blog or personal experience for the webmaster who decided to add some porn for some extra zest and appeal.
I want to see a lot more that stimulates my mind to make me in the mood. I need a harder edge than many and I am not ashamed to say that. One of my all time favorites is Kink, and this is not in the same class, not the same building or the same country for that matter.
I hate to complain about a site that was extremely cheap to join, but whatever little there was to download, I did not bother to keep.
This site probably deserves a score of fifty, but I am in a good mood today and will give them a few extra points for being a pioneer. I think 64 is about right.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Probably my favorite Japanese niche, the teacher and her student(s).
- 323 scenes that are all worth downloading if you're a fan of this niche and the various sub-niches it includes.
- Has a mixture of gender roles (see BL as it's a key pro).
- There are some HD scenes but no way to separate them. My feeling continues on these rare niches, the quality isn't as big of a deal to me. They do have good bitrates even on the lesser quality resolution ones.
- 131 models, nearly all have at least 2 scenes.
- Downloadable photos/screencaps.
- Good download speeds (80% of max) haven't ran into any download limits.
- Bring your imagination or some of these scenes might be disturbing.
Cons:
- Video quality is inconsistent but these are DVDs so they're drawing from the source material.
- I could see some people finding some of this to be offensive. Will explain below.
- One on one scenes not as good.
Bottom Line:
One of the most controversial niches in Japanese porn are the "inappropriate touching" scenes. I won't use the Japanese word. That's how a lot of these scenes start out. From a teacher being touched by a male student to a teacher being touched by one male student and multiple other male students getting involved. The categories list 20 of the scenes as group sex. Those are the ones that some people might be offended by. Of the categories, 28 more are listed as threesomes, those two can go into the inappropriate touching.
The fetishes that this site presents are business clothes, hose, stockings, heels, CFNM, clothed sex and better than most American sites there is a feeling of taboo here. I do believe that taboo has to do with Japanese men being typically smaller in stature and looking younger than they really are. The same with the female students looking very young.
This type of site plays to the positive side of the censoring mosaic. You'll get a lot of hands down pantyhose since the hose works as a mosaic. It gives the scenes more of an unwillingness feel to them. This quickly goes away when they start kissing and the woman, more times than not, is the more dominant (except in the group sex) cast member. This is one of my favorite parts of Japanese porn. I also have had a clothed sex fetish for many years and you get that here some with a teacher in a skirt riding on top of a male.
The quirkiness is here too. In some of the best possible ways. One scene has a female teacher standing in front of a podium. The classroom is all males. There's an older male hidden inside the podium and he has a pole with a finger on it rubbing it against the teacher's pantyhose crotch. She turns to write on the chalkboard and he's rubbing the pole/finger on her butthole. She gets so turned on she sits down in front of the podium and he's fingering her in front of the class.
Most of these scenes are not rough. Pantyhose tearing is common, the group sex ones do look rough like when 5 students are groping the teacher but these are mostly tame compared to the old Japanese touching videos from 10+ years ago.
I like them. The videos bitrate probably helps the lesser resolution scenes. Watching them in full screen on a 1080p monitor only brings in slight blurriness. The HD versions they do have are clear. Adding the screenshots adds a lot of value for me. These zips generally have around 150 screenshots in them.
I will say some of these scenes are quite old. One of the best ones I found was listed as November 2008 and if they're updating, I don't know where those updates are. The navigation is very good until you look for updates.
I think this is the best of the teacher sites. There are several scenes on here that I have seen before (tube sites) and wondered where they came from. I'll wrap up by saying both download speed and download limits are important on Japanese sites. Most have either poor download speeds and/or download limits. This site has neither with very good download speeds and I've downloaded nearly 200GB in one day without hitting a limit. Excellent value when using the TBP/PU discount. Recommended for those that are into any of the fetishes listed earlier or for anyone that wants to see some of the quirky world of Japanese porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It's like watching everything that goes on at the beach!
Public exhibitionism, voyeuristic, with a lot of content of 100% amateurs.
More sex than I thought there would be.
They have over 6,500 videos and 125,000 photos.
CCBill takes your money to the site.
The updates don't seem to be scheduled, but when they update, they post 10+ videos and hundreds of pictures, those come several times a month.
Cons:
There's nothing here that you're used to on porn sites. No model list, no search box.
Camera problems, a lot of the videos are shot from a distance that you can see everything, but not anything that clearly.
Short videos, it's probably part of the niche.
Bottom Line:
I was becoming frustrated and even bored with the glossy world of mainstream porn.
I was watching a scene on a tube site where a "wife" was getting suntan lotion rubbed on her by a stranger. The stranger decided she needed some suntan lotion on her parts covered by her bikini. I found it oddly erotic. I don't think I ever thought about beach porn.
The site is easy to use which I was not expecting. It looks like the last time they programmed it was before the internet was created. It's instead really easy to use and I kind of find the colors to be pleasant to my eyes. There are no ads anywhere on the site.
You have these choices:
Sex on the Beach, they have 1,005 of these scenes.
Nudism, they have 4,441 of these.
Then, 514 topless, 48 changing room, 334 foreplay and 119 not straight. That's how they have it listed. I found that a little confusing since I knew what it likely meant (gay), but thought maybe it meant the camera angle was off center. It is an amateur site.
This is very easy to use and find what you're looking for, but I won't go too far on the praising. When you click, "Sex on the Beach", it opens a page of the 18 newest videos. There's 56 of these pages.
I liked that they list the "author", but after watching enough scenes, I realized the "author" is the person filming it not one of the people involved in the scene.
The sex scenes are good, but I think it's because they're in public and you can hear the ocean washing in. The part I felt most disappointed in was the cumshots. Some of them use condoms and cum in the condom. Other times the guy jumps up, woman on her knees in front of him and all you see is his hairy back since the camera is behind them. When you do get the right angle on the cumshot it's one of those where the distance makes it nearly impossible to see. You have to go more by the woman's reaction.
I do get the feeling most if not all of this is filmed on nude beaches. The nudism videos have multiple nude people walking around and besides just seeing someone nude and unaroused there's not a lot of sexual energy in these.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, so they are good quality. It's just that distance that causes a problem with seeing the action. It kind of feels like I'm wanting a professional porn studio to go shoot these scenes with 3-4 cameras.
This is a community site and it has a forum for members to post in. I'm not really for sure what to think of it. One of the downsides to having a forum is it shows disgruntled customers. There are numerous posts about archives of content disappearing. There also are hardly no new posts on it. I only see one from 2020 and 6 from 2019. I will confirm they are adding content.
It wasn't really what I was looking for. I think I should maybe look for bikini/beach porn filmed with the camera closer, but it's not a bad site for seeing some surprising beach situations. If you're like me you might get frustrated with some of the content. Like 7 minutes of the guy and woman talking (you can't hear them), then 2 minutes of sex. Did they just have 9 minutes of video to use? It's probably rare content and I'm sure that makes it appealing to someone out there. I'm giving them an 80 for at least having 720p video and they do have zip files for their photos. Some of these look like aerial views.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Inexpensive two day trial membership, but no discount through PU
-Pioneer in porn for women genre. Started in 1999.
-Nominated for numerous XBIZ and AVN awards from 2012 to 2016
-Much of the content suggested by members. Some content, but not the videos, are member submitted.
Cons:
-The site tells me the biller is Phoenix Group. No link on members pages.
-Not a secure site (http, not https).
-Videos have hidden download link.
-The videos are not dated, so it is hard to tell how frequent updates are. Possibly not even updating.
-No zipdownloads for photos.
-Small photos at 1200x1600.
Bottom Line:
This site as started in 1999 to provide porn for women with a female focus. Sssh.com founder Angie Rowntree has been a frequent panel discussion participant at adult industry trade shows, and has been profiled by major media outlets including ABC’s Nightline, Cosmopolitan, CNBC, Fox News, Time Magazine and Psychology Today.
The Best Porn rated this an 80 in 2013 and Rabbits Reviews a 79 in2018. On Pornusers Pinkerton gave this a 78 in 2014. It was nominated for numerous XBIZ and AVN awards from 2012 to 2016.
Much of the content has been suggested by members. Some content, but not the videos, are even member submitted.
In 2013 the TBP review stated there were 269 videos and 475 photo galleries. When Rabbits Reviews counted the videos in 2018, they found only 255 and only 176 photo sets. In 2019 I don’t know how many of each there are. Most are not HD videos, I counted at most 20 and the photos are small by today’s standards at 1200x1600. You can’t use a zipdownload option as there is none and the sets have only a handful of photos in each one. The problem with getting an accurate count is that there are many subsections and categories and if you want to see older videos you need to find a link to an older website that is quite different than the one you see in the preview before signing up. The other problem is that many of the videos are split in to clips. I saw one that was eight updates, but I would call it one video.
The content rarely has a date associated with it, so it is impossible to see how often there are updates. One example that is dated is the one for the live twitter chat every Tuesday. The last time it was active was in 2015. You can download “51 Shades of Submission” a BDSM program of a virtual 3D world. It was added to the site in 2013 and looks to have very primitive graphics.
The category erotic movies come in sub categories:
Couples TV- 108 story driven porn videos. Some are interracial with black men. Not one has a non white female model. The videos can be downloaded if you click on show in HD and then right click to save after the video starts. Not many videos are HD, so this is counterintuitive.
Discover TV- 45 documentaries on BDSM, sex positions, guide to stripping for your partner, guide for bicurious women, you can meet a doctor specializing in sex questions, the art of the blowjob, g spot, a vibrator guide, women’s satisfaction guide, anal secrets, and the sex men love.
Kink Cinema -32 story driven BDSM videos. Low quality standard definition. Some cannot be downloaded.
Man Channel-7 male stripper videos Very low quality standard definition.
Girlfriend Channel-13 story driven lesbian videos form Dane Jones, Lesbea, Joy Bear, SexArt, etc.
Talk TV-42 videos featuring a talk format, such as interviews with both male and female pornstars, discussions of ethics in porn
History-four old porn videos. Black and white ranging from 1910 to 1950.
Three premium VOD channels with access included with membership. DVD scenes of heterosexual sex.
Next there are some interesting sections. Are they still active? Who knows.
All About You section-Member submissions of the Art of Masturbation techniques, articles about masturbation ethics, myths, learning from porn. Not very explcit galleries of erotic couples and women masturbating. Member submissions of masturbation stories.
Girl to Girl section-Member submitted lesbian stories, lesbian photo galleries, BiCurious articles
Shopping Boutique-Movie rentals, sex toys, toy reviews, dvd sales
Health and Sexual fitness section-Articles on topics ranging from the benefits of learning pole dancing, body weight and sex drive, sex and pregnancy, etc.
Style and Beauty which has standard female advice on lips, hair, skin, etc.
The site does its own billing and my bank lists it as Phoenix Group. I sent an email to cancel. It took a day to acknowledge cancellation and mind you I got a two day trial.
The site is not secure. My computer tells me it is http not https. This does not sit right. The website Digicert states “Any page providing an HTTP connection will cause the “Not Secure” warning. You should avoid conducting any sensitive transactions on these pages—such as logging in, providing personal information, or payment information—browsing insecure sites could put you at risk if you are viewing information that is dangerous or not condoned in your country.”
The impression I have is that they had a great idea when they started, but then gradually neglected it. I was disappointed with the current state of the site.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Updated:
07-02-1403:11pm (Update History) Reason: Thought score maybe a bit too low, weighing the quantity of the material that the site has to offer.
Pros:
Content Quantity. As of July, 2014 Beach Hunters indicates to non-members of amassing well over 3,600 "full-size video clips. Now that may sound a lot, but take in account these videos are in 3 different formats (avi, mpg, mp4, wmv) counted as separate videos.
Content Categories. Videos and photos are set in categories so that members can easily find material to their preference. Categories are as follows: sex on the beach, foreplay, nudism topless, change room, not straight.
Content Variety. Every body form imaginable, age (within legal limits of course) and sexual orientation is captured on site. Beachhunters' videographers seem to have no scruples on what they capture on the beach; skinny, curvy, wrinkly, morbidly obese, it's all here.
Cons:
Photos. Photos are very poor quality screen shots.
Editing. Many clips contain 3 plus minute of no activity, where the subjects are on their backs barely moving an inch. A great deal of editing could be used in the majority of their videos for the lack of activity as well as shaky hands syndrome, however Beachhunters seem to opt in using their editing talents into chunking up their videos in order to extend their library quantity, with no consideration given to their quality. Sadly this seems to be a common practice among these type of voyeur sites.
Sound. Videographers don't seem to be aware of the concept of self-noise, meaning when they move their equipment, it gets fairly loud. Do they know where the volume switch is on their equipment?
Recycling. Currently outside from membership access, I have visited their site to see if they in they had any fresh material worth to join up again and have noticed from their latest screen shots, they are reposting material from years ago!
Bottom Line:
If you're into photos and not much into videos, don't bother with this site. However despite the site's extremely poor edited content, they do have plenty of material for at least one month's membership, however due to its recycling of content, I wouldn't go further than that or ever consider going back again.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good value for money.
- Nicely laid out site.
- Latest videos are good quality 1280x720 HD though older content is much smaller.
- Photo sets are large and good quality.
- Access to hardcore content if desired (a separate site). The hardcore stuff is more conventional and aimed at guys, all are either 1280 or 1920 HD.
- More than just a porn site, also provides lots of sex-related information to help couples spice up their sex lives.
Cons:
- Navigation could be better - not very organised and little or no information about older content, when it was added, etc. In fact I'm not sure that much older content is still on the site.
- Older content is 640x480 (or 360) resolution.
- Content is mostly streamed, very few direct download videos, though there are ways of capturing the streamed video to a file using browser add-ins.
- You have to navigate to the "Old Menu" to get at the older content and the hardcore content.
Bottom Line:
First up, this is a porn site aimed at women and couples, so it's tricky site to objectively review because it's more than just a porn site, it's also a sex information site that includes porn aimed at women as well as men. The main movies content doesn't feature the guy cumming on the girl's face or in her mouth, in fact cumshots are rare though the couples do "climax".
With all the information this site provides, it can be a useful tool to help couples spice up their sex lives.
If you're looking for something different to the usual male-oriented porn then this site is worth a look, but having said that I probably wouldn't join again unless my wife expressed an interest in watching porn.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Material isn't bad and offers some good video. 'Director' function is pretty cool.
Cons:
Some poor browser integration
No downloads
Shady billing renewal practices
Bottom Line:
A decent site, but their billing is VERY different; on the side of being a scam compared to most sites. My card declined their renewal because of the way they did it (according to the company) and the 'card declined' message is usually the end of it; Saboom customer service insists that I need to pay them for the renewal before I get 'penalties'. VERY SHADY, will not respond to my emails regarding having NEVER USED THE ACCOUNT IN THIS TIME PERIOD, and I am not even sure if they are capable (service department, that is) of speaking english, just german.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Full service interracial site: video, pix, amateur pix/vid/stories, community board, (ads to other content)
- plenty of the amateur stuff is hot (really liked some of the stories) but finding stuff I liked was tough.
- Looks like they bought content for "cheaters" I see Kelly Wells here and some other recognizable names
- Membership includes Mandytayler, Barbisinclair, Call your husband, cuckolds, interriacialsex, and bazaar insertions
- stream or download content (flv or .mp4)
- the professional shoots are well done with clear sound and good lighting
Cons:
- The site is too large for the navigation it has. Finding this is a pain, also many link bring up a window in a window, so you need to make sure you pull down the current bar to scroll down.
- Many of the amateur girls are people I'd rather not see naked. If you like chubby amateurs this site has a good number. Don't get me wrong some of these girls are stunning
- Most recent update was 2011! (And I don't think it was exclusive content)
- 720X480 2.6 mbps video quality
- There are about 50 professional videos, but most of them are pro-am star barbi sinclair. (I'd rather just download her stuff from her site which is part of the network)
- Ads in members area
-2001 feel - there's a resource section where you can download screen savers with instructions for what must be windows 2000.
Bottom Line:
I've seen this site around for a while, so I'm glad I had the chance to check it out with the network I joined. While interracial isn't really my think I love slutty wives.
Anyway - I'm glad I didn't join for this. I was disappointed and now mark dark caravan as a skip in my book. Between the difficulty of navigation, the relatively small content, it's just not worth it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of nice voyeur videos from (russian?) beaches
- Navigation is ok and easy to check
- Trial available
- multi filetype support
- some videos are high definition
Cons:
- some videos are realy bad quality or wiggly
- increased amount of FAKE voyeur videos found in last months
- most "video episodes" are discontiguous :(
- very rare closeups scenes
Bottom Line:
if you like couples or naked women and men on beaches doing nasty things you will love beachhunters!
The amount of videos (seperated in several categories like "sex on the beach" or "topless") is huge and there are even HD videos available.
Good is that there are several oppotunities of downloading the files in different filesizes and formats.
Not so good is that there are no or very rare closeups videos or scenes :(
Even if the most beachhunters videos are REAL i have noticed that they upload a non irrelevant amount of FAKE VIDEOS that are staged and NOT real voyeur! Thats why i have to diminish my rating from 80 to 77.
In general beachhunters is absolutely worth a look for everyone who is in voyeur videos!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of Video Content
Very Easy Navigation
Updated Often with Lots of Content
Cheap and Long Trial Period
Newer Videos are High Quality
Decent Download Speeds
Pictures are Zip
You can Download different video formats(avi, mp4, wmv)
No DRM
Cons:
Video Editing is Horrible Video Clips are Redundant
Older Pictures are Screen Captures (poor quality)
Some Videos are Set-Up (fake)
Videos can be Too Short
Some "HD" videos aren't really HD
Very few pussy close-up videos/pics
Bottom Line:
If you are into casual public nudity and public sex then this site offers the most content for the price. There are about 110 pages of video clips with about 40 videos per page and 80 pages of pictures/screen captures, also with 40 sets per page.
You can download the videos in 3 different formats (avi, wmv, mp4) or stream them (except for HD videos). The pictures are available in zip files and sorted by date. In all there is a lot of content here, especially for first time subscribers.
The downfall, however, comes with how the content is presented. In some cases you get 15-30 seconds of a particular woman, and then in other videos (mostly the sex on the beach kind) you get 10-20 minuets. Also, a decent amount of the updates are continuations of previous scenes. There is one couple on here that appears in about 20% of the sex videos. They obviously swing a lot, but man how many times can you show them!
Also, the editing of the clips is horrible. You may get 5-7 seconds of one woman and then it cuts to another woman and then back to the first woman. It is annoying if you like one of them and not the other. Finally, some of the videos are fake (i.e. fake public sex or fake changing rooms). This takes away from the other "voyeur" content that is real and many of the members post complaints on the forums about this.
But when taken as a whole this is probably the best nude beach site on the net I have found. It just needs variety of content and better presentation.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
