Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s my most consistent highly-rated site and it does not disappoint
Six updates per month and the last few months have included lesbian scenes
Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
Tags are accurate and the site is still one of the easest to use
4K downloadable videos if you pay the premium price, I pay $34.95 and get 720p and 1080p downloads
Downloadable picture zips only included if you pay at least for the $34.95 membership
The sexiest models in porn
Cons:
It’s not difficult for me but I imagine a new user would be frustrated with the membership tiers
Knowing if anything ever happens to my In The Crack external hard drive, I’ll have to pay at least $80 to download it all again.
Bottom Line:
It’s In The Crack, in this day of mega networks and cookie cutter porn content, In The Crack continues to just do what they do best. They have a simple equation, it goes like this get a top tier looking model, make her look pretty and even down to earth, then have her show how flexible and kinky she is. Sounds like my idea of a perfect date. In The Crack isn’t going to impress you with deep, psychological plots that revolve around the same half-dozen premises you’re used to. They’re going to impress you with gorgeous women doing the most kinky poses.
It says a lot for In The Crack when I say my favorite picture sets are from In The Crack. That’s probably the last thing they are known for, but their colors, settings and the way they dress and present the models is top-notch. I’m never disappointed with any of their picture sets.
I have also never been disappointed by their model selections. White, black, Latina, Asian, they’re all great. It’s also worth mentioning, over the last few months, In The Crack has added a few lesbian sets. Their lesbian sets are often considered the best in porn and I agree.
Here is the easy way to use In The Crack, look at the top of the page and click, “Collections”. That’s how I do it. The scenes are listed in descending order from the newest to oldest. I just go through and download every scene, every photoset and there’s no hesitation. The content is that good and it’s that consistent. I guess you could call it Simplified Porn.
Of course, while the content is simple to know what to download, joining isn’t as simple. I’ll help you out again, the $34.95 tier is the lowest priced option to receive downloadable zips for the photos. That’s the one I join. You also have downloadable videos and a monthly download limit of 300GB. You can go up to $39.95 tier and will receive the 4K downloads on top of everything included at $34.95 and the $39.95 tier includes a monthly download limit of 500GB. For those that want completely unlimited and access to 4K, too, there is the $69.95 tier. It has everything included and no monthly limit.
In The Crack makes some of the most explicit and kinky masturbation porn look classy. You don’t need a plot with their content. It’s all right there on the screen. The plot is all the things your mind is thinking about doing to the model. The models even move a little slower, smoother and are somehow 100% feminine, even with something up their butt. It’s sites like In The Crack that remind me of how much I enjoy porn but sadly, In The Crack also reminds me of how overproduced and glossy the mainstream is in porn.
I have tried finding faults. I have inspected the photos in their highest quality state but no faults. Oh, there is that one lesbian video from the early years of In The Crack’s life that has the sound muted. They even point it out before you download it. It’s as good of a site as I have ever joined.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the purest, realest porn sites
Women of all ages, body types and experience levels
Really the only story I need porn to have
Artistic, dramatic, all from amateur, sometimes self-shot videos
Scenes are presented how masturbation is – climatic
Takes some time to get used to using the site, but sooner is more likely than later
Cons:
Download limit of 15GB per day. I have tried to hit it but haven’t been able to download more than 10GB per day.
There are no pictures. You can make your own from the videos, but there are no separate photo sets
Bottom Line:
I feel myself deserves an award for being the best and most accurately named site. All the content is about women – feeling themselves. I always thought this site sounded boring. It’s not. I was just dumb. Really dumb. There is so much beauty and eroticism in the videos. From seeing goosebumps on a young woman’s thighs, to seeing a woman quiver and shake with a screaming orgasm. I got the feeling a lot of these women didn’t even know how loud or vocal they are. This is one of those sites that what’s missing may be the biggest positive. There are no naked men or balls or dicks or preparation for the money shot. I have to believe the women on this site feel different about shooting these scenes than women being filmed in hardcore scenes.
At the core of the content, you are watching a woman with an exhibitionistic side performing for the camera and how many ever eyes she wants to fantasize is watching. I believe that is true. You see raw emotions. You feel the orgasms. You can even see the orgasms as contractions get in time with body quivers.
And that is the only story I need from porn. A woman wants to orgasm and wants me to watch her. No need for attempted acting or even acting natural. There is no acting on this site. It’s all real. Every orgasm, toe curl, nipple squeeze, moan, shriek, it’s all real. If I stopped right there, I would feel confident about scoring this site between 95-100.
I’m stopping there. There are close to 6,000 videos. There’s nothing to talk about with the videos except the 1080p download option.
The settings alone could be a part of story. Most of these look like a woman at a hotel or her own bed, masturbating and showing off her orgasms. I don’t even pay attention to if they have clothes on to begin the scenes. I don’t care if they are fully dressed. The thrill from these scenes has to do with watching the woman reach blissful ecstasy. Her insecurities, moral beliefs, are all removed for a 10-30 second eruption of orgasms.
I find myself surprised by how little the nudity or lack thereof doesn’t truly affect the scenes and their hotness. Women masturbating in their panties is a lot hotter than I thought it was. It’s because these women are really masturbating and not just performing for pay.
The most attractive part of any of the scenes for me is when the woman is masturbating. She looks at the camera and you can see her legs spreading more like she was shy, but it feels too good to be shy. There is a lot of the feeling of these models reach a point, in nearly every scene, where nothing, but that orgasm matters to them.
The people who own this site also own Beautiful Agony and I Shot Myself. Beautiful Agony is similar to I Feel Myself except it is nearly always focused just on the woman’s face. I Feel Myself shows the face and body trying to fight, hide, restrain, the embarrassing orgasm, leading to the tension, relief and release. You can learn a lot about the human body by watching these scenes. You can see every muscle that tightens up during orgasm.
It's definitely different, but for me, it is the unique one, while other sites try their more complex-view of porn. It likely is the strongest point of I Feel Myself. It’s simple, nothing complex, no dumb story to get in the way and most importantly, no biased director or producer telling the woman how to feel or moan or enjoy or sound.
It's performance porn. The whole world is the stage. The models truly look like they are performing for a sold out group of people.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ The other site that started my interest in porn.
+ Like with Little Mutt, I cannot say for sure if Yanks is updating with new content, but I can say they have nearly 2,500 videos and 2,000 photo sets.
+ Videos are downloadable and top resolution is 1920x1080.
+ Photo sets are also downloadable in zip files.
+ Nearly 750 amateur models.
+ Includes access to an all-male masturbation site called Club Stroke.
+ Site navigates well and has useful tags.
Cons:
- There is reason to believe the new updates are just old content they are reposting as new.
- It’s almost all masturbation.
- Some video scenes do not have a photo set.
Bottom Line:
It is hard to review Yanks and Little Mutt at the same time. Mainly because I joined both of them in 2015 and these sites started my interest in porn. It’s hard not to compare the two sites to each other. Both are amateur and it looks like both have stopped updating with new content. But just like Little Mutt has some redeeming qualities, one could say Yanks has even more redeeming qualities.
The size of the site helps with the possibility of recycling content. There are nearly 2,500 videos and over 2,000 photo sets. You can download them to your heart’s content with no limit. The video quality on Yanks is very good too. You can download the majority of the scenes in 1920x1080 resolution.
They have a useful model list and have nearly 750 amateur models on their site. The bonus site – Club Stroke, is a good opposite site to Yanks. Club Stroke is solo guys masturbating. It’s not a very big site with just over 100 videos, but it introduced me to male masturbation porn.
Yanks focuses on solo women masturbating and having real orgasms. I believe that’s the most difficult part of porn – getting the woman to have a real orgasm. The orgasms on Yanks are very believable and some are even embarrassing for the female model having the leg-cramping, body-shaking orgasm on camera. I noticed in most of the scenes, the woman’s breathing gave away the real orgasms. I could tell their breath had been taken away for a few seconds.
Yanks even taught me a lot about myself and views on sexuality. I watched these female models masturbate to those great orgasms and thought about, it wasn’t their bodies I was looking at and thinking about. It was me thinking about having an orgasm that felt like the model showed her orgasm feeling. I do believe we are in one of the quandaries of porn. If my beliefs are right and I’m attracted to watching the women have better orgasms than I have had, shouldn’t it be similar for men? I have watched male masturbation porn and thought the guys that shoot a lot of cum look like their orgasm felt better than the guy that barely came a few drops.
It's at least interesting to me and I have Yanks to thank for me noticing my feelings may not be about taboo sexual attraction to other women and might just be me being envious of their orgasms.
I’m making this sound way too scientific. Unlike Little Mutt, which dropped from a favorite site to one I doubt I will join again, Yanks is still a favorite, however, if they don’t have new content coming out, it will be a short-lived return to my original positive and excited feelings towards Yanks.
Anyone could join this site and enjoy the content. The videos are good enough download quality and pictures are not bad either. The models are generally cute and playful. It’s very enjoyable porn and recommended.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It focuses on putting you in a woman’s bedroom or two women’s bedroom and watching them during their most intimate times.
Excellent camerawork that captures the model’s faces at the right times, it’s not always that explicit.
More updates than some networks and it’s just one site. Sixteen so far in April 2022 and it’s only the 11th of the month.
Emotionally charged scenes that will make you forget formulaic.
Real orgasms in under 10-15 minutes that will make you wonder what you’re doing wrong.
Much appreciated tags that are some of the most specific I’ve seen. Aimed at people with obscure fetishes?
Cons:
Some of the videos are under a minute and aren’t masturbation.
Real women from what I can tell that aren’t porn models. That’s going to be a con to some.
Bottom Line:
A site that surprised me a lot. Who knew a porn site could be named prophetically? This site should make anyone feel themselves. There is nothing high-tech with the site. It’s just an older looking site that looks like they decided to let their scenes speak for itself. I haven’t seen many of these niches before. There are scenes that I really liked of women masturbating while watching porn. That’s not something I see much in porn. There are scenes of women in a dark room with some clothes on, all clothes on, no clothes on, masturbating over their clothes, under the clothes and nude. The nice women hop up on their knees and give you a better view. The naughty ones are too busy enjoying themselves and don’t care who is watching or if you’re liking it. It’s almost too real. Possibly too real for some people to like even. Not me and not specifically you, just some.
The tags are an important part to me and part of the reason I’ll come back to the site. When they list “hairy” the woman really is hairy. They even have a tag for “pets”. Which is there for you guessed it. A pet decided to get in the view of the camera. They make sure to tell you there’s no bestiality. The tags include ones like “tattoo free” and “hands on” meaning no sex toys. There are ones for “flush” as a redhead, I know about flush skin. These tags tell you so much more about the parts of porn that people complain more about than those silly stories most sites have on the scenes. There is even a “watching porn” tag. I don’t think any site has this specific of tags.
The quality is surprisingly good. Most of the videos have 720p or 1080p download options. There is a download limit, but I have not reached it. It does seem small at 10 GB per day. But the scenes are short. There’s not much talking in any of the scenes. You get some moaning. And the tag I think really plays to people with fetishes is, “contractions”. That means the woman contracts during orgasm. I try to keep up with everything the tags said to expect. The older scenes are not as explicit as the newer ones. I believe they maybe changed their style of scenes or the women in the scenes changed. Some of these women – I am assuming all are amateurs, really go at masturbating and making sure you see everything. It is a style of porn I am not used to. I noticed there is a quote from a user of that site that says she cried the first time she watched a scene from the site. That could be more normal than we think. This site makes it very clear that these women want to be filmed, want to enjoy themselves without being insulted or stereotyped. You end up with some very good performances.
It may still fall short for some people. The only story is these women want to orgasm. There’s no stepdad is watching, and mom is with stepbrother in the shower. It does seem like a very different type of porn than we are used to. It looks more like a woman decided to get naked and said, “Okay, turn the camera on. I’m ready!” There are scenes that have more than one person and those have some talking. They even have a tag for talking. I just can’t explain how important those tags are and the best feature of the tags, if you scroll over the tag, it tells you what it means. Like “Tummy Girls” that means the woman masturbates some in the video while facing down usually with her butt up in the air. It even gives you some educational tidbits like, “20% of women say they masturbate facing down sometimes.”
I don’t know about recommending it. I would, but I have heard things from porn fans. Things that made me want to find different porn. This site really does that for me. I am sure on the score too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Solo, extreme, gaping, pretty and sexy women.
Averages 3 updates per month. It looks like they could have more than that, but nothing consistent with the update schedule.
High quality videos and photos. All are downloadable and unlimited.
Very pretty models that I think are nearly all European. There are a few that may not be.
Bipolar porn, she looks innocent, she’s acting innocent, don’t stick THAT in there! She does it anyway. Somehow, these models do that in a pretty way.
Good navigation and tags, but they do have a lot of tags. The most I think I’ve ever seen.
Cons:
It's no surprise this site is on Sapphix just like Sapphic Erotica and there is the white living room again. If a person recognized the background city, they could go watch these scenes in person. The windows have no curtains. It’s a joke, but the white background isn’t.
The scenes on this are different. A lot of the newer ones are just masturbation with some extreme parts. The older scenes are the most extreme masturbation I have seen. That’s going to be pro for some and a con for others. I don’t mind it, but believe it fits better in the cons. It’s not what you expect from solo porn.
Bottom Line:
I can set up the scenes on this site by saying the model will convince you she’s an innocent little dove (thanks all white background!). She will then tease and show a little skin. She will show how pretty she is. I look away and she has a baseball bat stuck up in her and her legs in a V. It’s whoa porn. You skipped some things on your way to that V. I like it just because it jumps from innocent to not innocent in a split second or V. The models look like they belong on a softcore, glamorous site. Seeing them with only their heels on and they left those on for grips. It’s a good change from sites that stay within the softcore niche. Yeah, she’s pretty, has a nice body, but I just don’t think a guy or woman is going to want her just teasing. I want to believe women this pretty make people want to gape them. That is a unique concept this site has going for it.
Its overall size is not as big as you might think. It “only” has 402 scenes and has been open since 2004. They had a lull in updates from 2009 to 2013. There is disparity between the newest scenes and oldest scenes. It really doesn’t seem like the same site even. I do believe just like with Sapphic Erotica, it’s the models that are making that difference. It could be production as well. There are some really pretty models in the newer scenes that do some extreme. I really like Candy Belle’s scene. It’s after the lull period. I know they have it in them to make the more extreme and even excited masturbation scenes. I never thought I would say a woman using a Magic Wand on her clitoris and has a dildo up her butt, was not extreme, but it’s not extreme in 2022. I think housewives do that now.
The quality is as high as I think you can get. Especially if you consider how long they have the high quality. You can go back before the lull and those still have 720p and 1080p downloads. They had 4K starting at the new year in 2015. The scenes are very long for solo porn. The Candy Belle scene I mentioned is 52 minutes long of her teasing, in the bathtub, on the bathroom floor, on a chair, using a Magic Wand, a very girthy dildo stuck to the floor, using the sprayer in the bathtub. She ran out of toys. You still don’t get the extremes that the old scenes had. The baseball bats, the needing an assist from another model just to get that bat in her.
It’s good for those that like solo, long and teasing scenes. They do a good job of showing how teasy the model is at the beginning of the scenes. That sometimes can last 10-15 minutes. I don’t know that everyone likes that. I do, but I like softer porn. I keep thinking I’m going to develop some of the teasing ability if I watch enough. I do believe the easiest way for me to describe is it’s different. I haven’t seen sites like this. The models do it all with a big, pretty smile.
It's a good site for when you feel like you’ve seen everything that porn has to offer which isn’t much these days. I’m sure that there was a reason, some demand even, for this site to be opened back up in 2014 after the 4 years of no updates. I have liked it the last few times I joined Sapphix.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No site has flirted with 100 more than In the Crack but I have still yet to give it a 100. I think the average for In the Crack from me has been around 96 for about 12 years.
- This review is based on the In The Crack Plus membership which is $34.95/mo. It has everything I want and “need” with a membership. Bottom Line will have details.
- One of the few sites that will leave you torn between wanting a hot model and a nice vacation.
- In my opinion, the best quality photos and videos available from any site.
- Though there are lesbian scenes here and there, the majority of the site is solo content and that’s why it doesn’t get a 100 from me. Solo is my favorite. I may be a little biased. It is the best solo site on the internet.
- Fast downloads (see bottom lin
Cons:
- The tiered pricing is sure to bother some people. I admit, the first time I joined with the tiered pricing, I received the membership that doesn’t include zip downloads for pictures and was quite annoyed.
- Let’s nitpick, the site itself still looks like it did in 2012 and maybe 2007. Does that bother me? Not at all.
Bottom Line:
I have talked about the greatest compliments I can pay a site, and In the Crack has several of those distinctions. I was first a member when they were still having audio problems. The videos, the close-ups, the ways the models are presented, have all been copycatted. But none can fool me into thinking I’m looking at an In the Crack photo or video set. Take a look at their scenes. Tell me a site that has those colors in their scenes, those backdrops, those angles, those shadows, those what are they called? Women? It’s the prettiest porn site in the history of internet porn. Don’t shy away. This is not some run of the mill artsy, glam site. With all the prettiness and perfect colors, one could assume the action is safe and glam. Then you see a model do a split across a bathtub and see how many bathroom objects she can shove in herself. No hole is sacred. No emotion is either. Happiness, sexiness, arrogance maybe, and writhing, pulsating orgasms.
In the Crack hasn’t made it this long without being good at something. Count the years, over 20, and they were always at the top of the industry in quality. It's that unique, it’s that high of quality. And the models put on their best performances. I have a whole list of models that had their best performance on In the Crack. I said it in a previous review. Once you join In the Crack, you may not ever join another site.
I don’t remember when the tiered pricing started but I will say it’s not like the tiers or add-on prices that other sites use. In the Crack played it ethically and to help the potential members. Before the tiered pricing, In the Crack, was $34.95/month. They don’t do promos or coupons. They don’t need to. Their content speaks for itself. The tiered pricing was a move to help potential members. I’m sure they knew that the $34.95 price was steep to the average porn site member. They came out with the basic membership. It’s like a trial and it’s $9.95 for a full month. You can stream any of the videos in SD. You can also view the “small” resolution pictures. Not many sites do that. They’re giving people a chance to experience their content without spending $35. The next step up is a logical one, it’s called Stream. It’s $19.95 and you can stream in SD and 720p. You also can view the large pictures. The next step up was the one that got me awhile back. It’s called Standard. It lets you view all sizes of pictures; stream all sizes AND you can download the 720p videos. That’s where they got me. I didn’t realize you can’t download the pictures. The standard is $24.95. There’s something else to add to this. Starting with Standard, there are download limits. Those are listed on their site. They’re very upfront about it.
For me, since my one mistake of joining Standard, I don’t even fool with looking at the tiers. I want downloads on pictures and videos. You have to jump up to the Plus membership. It’s $34.95 the same price their site was before the tiered pricing. The Plus gets me everything I want. It has 720p and 1080p downloads. The big pictures can be downloaded in zips and it is the membership that will give the non 4K fans, the best experience. They have two more steps up, the 4K and the Ultimate. The 4K explains what it adds and it’s $39.95. The difference between 4K membership and Ultimate is the download limit. I don’t find their limits to be a problem. The Plus equals out to 300 GB per month. I usually hit about 80-150 GB per month on it. I do think the only way the limits really matter is if you have to have 4K. In that case, it’s probably best to join the Ultimate. It’s unlimited and you get 4K. The cost of it may make you decide you don’t have to have 4K. It’s $69.95/mo. If you have a fast internet connection and want 4K, I would do the Ultimate. Set aside a month per year just for In the Crack. It’s what I do.
You will see models’ prettiest content and possibly dirtiest content on this site. You don’t like pictures? Try the pictures from In the Crack. The only thing that stops the 100 is I know the price combined with tiers is just not going to set well with some people. The content itself is an easy 100. I wouldn’t even suggest them to change their tiers or price. It’s something you have to try and see for yourself that if (enter site name) is worth $19.95/mo, In the Crack is worth $34.95 or more per month.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best throwback-style solo female sites.
- Large site/series with over 1,000 scenes.
- Arguably the best-looking group of young models you will ever see. Especially if you’re into natural looking models not into glam.
- Newest videos have 4K, most of the rest have at least HD or 720 and 1080p downloads. (have to pay higher join price to get downloads, it’s worth it).
- Could stand on its own but comes with the stellar Cherry Pimps network.
- Fast download speeds at 90% of my max.
- Nearly 700 models and high quality photosets with downloadable zips.
Cons:
- It’s not updating, at least not specifically, the 2020/2021/2022 scenes that look like they would fit in this series are just being uploaded directly to Cherry Pimps now.
- Prices could be better. It costs $29.95 per month with downloads. The only promos I have found were for streaming-only.
Bottom Line:
Cherry Spot is like a trip back to the days of simpler porn. The kind of porn I love. Get a pretty model, give her a cute outfit that doesn’t look like she’s going to a ballroom dance and let her be herself. Not a porn star, not a sexual object, just a young woman that is turned on knowing someone wants to see her naked and enjoying her body. That’s what Cherry Spot does. It may do it better than any other solo model focused series or site does it.
The orgasms are real, the scenes are not that long, and the models hit those faces that you know they wouldn’t make if they were more worried about their image as a model. You can even see some laugh and roll their eyes in a playful way like, “I can’t believe I lost control.” The only site I know of that still gets models to do that on a regular basis is FTV. Cherry Spot is a part of Cherry Pimps network, and it does have its own section on the network. Part of that is because the network is so large. That is one way to save some money too, join for 3 months or a year. A year membership is only $99, and it includes unlimited downloads. It’s the only network I currently have an ongoing year membership to.
Everything is simple including the navigation. The scenes do not want to tell you a story. Just watch the model and you will know what they’re going for. She grins a lot at first, she takes some clothes off and maybe gives you a wink. She lays down on the bed or sits in a chair and her eyes tell you (at least me) to come to her and watch close. Someone at Cherry Pimps has a lot of experience in working with solo models. The models finger, toy, moan and spread wide for you to see. Man, or female watching, doesn’t matter, both know where to lick to make the model happy. Both know where to stick a plastic dick or a real one. The models do seem to use that style of thinking in their solo play. You can watch how many of the start out playing with their clit, then once wet, they stick their fingers in. I don’t know if they look, they give when they stick their fingers in is of how good their fingers feel going in or how wet and warm, they feel inside. I just know it works for me.
It helps that the models are all attractive with most being in the highest tier of attractiveness. I used to think solo porn struggled due to the models being too inexperienced. The models didn’t really respond to the solo play. These models do and love it. Should there be a pro for how good the production and direction are? That does look like the case. I have seen these models on other sites without near the enthusiasm they have when working with the Cherry Pimps. While the site is not updating, it’s not a complete loss since Cherry Pimps has the new scenes and updates that would have been updated onto this site. This just gives you a more focused, less searching, way to see the 1,000+ videos of solo models showing how solo porn should be.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with Lets Doe It Network
Labor Day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Great looking pornstars and some I think are amateurs
Highest quality production values
Uses tags for easy searching, however searching is across the network
Cons:
Monthly download limit of 100 videos for the network as a whole
Only 80 scenes
Has not updated since September 2017
Bottom Line:
For me when I think of the word quest, I imagine a long complicated story with a hero looking for something rare and difficult to reach. In contrast, this site is about heroines finding female sexual empowerment by masturbating. These heroines could easily be me or really any modern woman. I could also imagine these videos being used as a teaching guide for women on how to satisfy those urges we all get. This quest can be fulfilled with a site like this showing how.
The women are all portrayed as pretty, but not different from you or me. The scenes start with interviews, with both them and the interviewer having difficulty with English. This helps me see their sincerity when they answer questions about their education, hobbies and non sexual interests. They laugh, they smile, they explain and it all makes me feel I know them and want to learn more. A few are described as pornstars, such as the superstar Alexis Crystal, but mostly they appear to be naturally beautiful young ladies who want to make a little money doing what comes across as what they do every day in their personal lives. Porn interviews generally don’t hold much interest for me, but these I loved.
The scenes vary in length, but the interviews are about a third of each scene. The models do what they said they like, using fingers, a few videos have fisting, dildos, other toys, but especially wands. Some videos would work well as commercials for wand companies. The orgasms are depicted as real and I am sure they are. In some the expressions on their faces are an indicator of the intensity, and in many their whole body shakes. I see myself in these models and their videos.
The feeling of the site is that the production is professional, even if some of the models are not. They use multiple cameras and the scenes focus changes as necessary. The makeup is great and so are the locations. As there are only 80 scenes, I was left wondering why there are not a few more. Surely there must be many more models who would be willing to do scenes of this quality. They are made to look their best and portrayed as women to be appreciated. But, the last update was four years ago.
This site comes with the Lets Doe it Network, which I really loved. Right now there is a special low price of $9.94 for a month and this site alone is worth a lot more than that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites.
The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review.
-Navigation is basically simple.
-There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well.
-Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to.
-Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient.
-The content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion.
-I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing.
-The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images.
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
Bottom Line:
The 5 sites of this network include:
Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck
Wet and Pissy
Simply Anal
Eurobabe Facials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites.
The stats for Wet and Puffy network:
Over 27000 photos. and
Over 480 models.
They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets.
They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple.
The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors.
Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos.
You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus.
Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high.
The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels.
The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels.
In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models.
The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing.
Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive.
Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority.
There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with.
Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy.
Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness.
The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model.
The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination.
Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing.
I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid.
Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year.
I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers.
But I can't agree the models are attractive.
Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discount of $9.95 for the first month. Recurring at $24.95/mo.
-Exclusive content.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-User name is your email address, and you can choose your password, so they are easy to remember.
-Video choice of definition: 240p through 1080p. No 4K available for the site.
-Since the site focuses on female solo masturbation, the tags do a fine job describing the sex action of the video.
-They have a text listing of all the model names at the network (without any thumbnails).
You click on a model's name, it brings up the model's page, with large-sized thumbnails of the model, her videos at the network, and hot links to her content, with a very brief physical description of her attributes.
-PornDoe has a live cam channel. I'm not into live cams, so I didn't explore the channel.
Except the thumbnails show a lot of cute girls.
And there are some free videos and clips, mainly from Club Sweethearts, which is the new name for Club Seventeen.
Cons:
-Poor navigation. For a relatively small site, the site layout is poor.
Sometimes the whole network is fucking stupid.
You might have to navigate (click) through 2 pages of ads to get to the site you want to examine.
Sometimes they present the site in a foreign language, instead of the English language I'm familiar with.
Sometimes you are logged out of the network when you switch channels, and when you try to log back in, you have to click through 2 separate pages of ads before you reach the home page.
-There are ads on every page in the members area, once you get past the 2 separate pages that are only ads.
-Archive site. The last update was apparently Sep 04, 2017.
-They have a photoset for each video, but the photosets contain maybe 10 to 14 photos per set, and are not worth collecting.
-Two pre-checked cross-sales on join page. Be sure to uncheck the cross-sales, because they are limited trials that quickly turn into expensive memberships.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is a download limit of 100 videos per month, for the network. A download from any site in the network counts toward that limit.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Quest For Orgasm has 80 Scenes. So it's a small site. But you get access to the Lets Doe It network, which has around 15 sites. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they select attractive models and present them in glamcore style as some of the finest, most attractive models on the internet.
-You can sort the videos by newest, most popular, most viewed, or by longest.
-The models range from OK-looking, to attractive, to very attractive. But much more effort is put into making the models more attractive and glamorous at some of the other sites in the network, especially The White Boxxx site.
The models are white, Eastern European girls, late teens to early 30s.
The videos have a runtime from about 28 minutes to about 40 minutes at Quest For Orgasm.
The videos start out with an interview with the model, her life, why she got into porn, what she likes about porn, her hobbies. Trying to make the models seem real, that the models are normal people. After the interview, the model takes off her clothes and uses different toys to achieve orgasm.
Aside from the lousy navigation (the ads, the site time-outs), I didn't find most of the masturbation scenes that erotic. There is no fantasy element. It's porn stars using dildos to achieve orgasm.
Add that it's an archive site with no new content.
Add that there's little effort put into making the models attractive.
I signed up for a one-year membership to the network.
But the increased ads and the fast time-out and the increased difficulty of using the network mean this is my last membership to the network.
I don't have the patience to keep clicking through to find the content that I like.
That's in spite of how gorgeous some of these models are.
This is one of the poorer sites in the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 71.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Nearly all solo girl content of some very attractive European models.
- Has some variation in the scenes including speculum and bigger insertions, reminds me a lot of Give Me Pink.
- Very high quality on the video downloads.
- Good download speed (80% of my max)
- Uses Epoch as the biller.
- Downloadable photos in low quality or high quality.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- Pre-checked cross sale at sign-up
- Anytime you’re dealing with a solo site you’re going to run into the potential of the scenes being too similar.
Bottom Line:
I would say to anyone that is a fan of Give Me Pink, you should give this site a try as the shooting style and action itself is similar to it.
The main selling point of a solo site is the looks of the models and how believable they are. These are European models so you’re not going to get a lot of dirty talk or feedback from the models to go by and I think that does hurt a little, at least now in 2020, years ago we didn’t care about something like that. The models here are mostly white with a few darker models. The body types are in-between slender and average. I would say they are all attractive.
There are 979 scenes just on this site and you also get access to 4 other sites. The site has a few scenes that are not solo with a second woman helping but those are rare. I think most people that are into solo porn would be just as happy if there weren’t scenes with more than one woman. The solo content they have here does have some teasing in it and that to me, is a major part of solo porn. If the model can’t get you interested or keep you interested you’re probably not going to watch her masturbate either. You’re not going to find any soon to be major solo stars on this site. That’s also one of the frustrating parts about liking solo porn. You could watch 10 scenes and every other one could be considered poor. I think solo porn brings in your own fantasies and because of that what I may like, you may not like.
These scenes are good enough to give a try if you’re into solo porn. They have nice photo sets with usually 100+ photos in each. The models are often clothed at the beginning of the scenes and at least try to tease. The photos can be downloaded as zips. The video download options stand out as well. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p, 320p and a WMV version as well. Each scene also has a trailer if you want to watch a little before downloading the full scene. If you give it a try make sure to make note of this, the photo zip downloads are in with the video downloads. At first, I didn’t think they had any photo downloads, but they do and give you a low and high option.
The site also has a very deep, I’m going to say, too deep of a search engine that gives you hundreds of options to choose from in your search. I tried a few of the more obscure looking options and got 0 results. That’s why I say it’s too deep. Still the site is part of a full network that comes with 4 other sites including some pissing fetish sites. Their quality is plenty good. Their navigation is as well. There’s not a lot to complain about and they also use Epoch as a biller so it’s easy to subscribe and cancel.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very cheap at $9.95 a month
Vendo is a biller I trust
968 videos and part of five site network as well
Stockings and pantyhose in many scenes
Has been updating once a week during pandemic
Works well on my cell phone.
Cons:
For me the models are hit and miss as to their looks
Too much standard masturbation porn aimed at men.
Bottom Line:
Wet and Puffy has a lot to like about it. At $9.95 a month I took a chance as I like to see women masturbating. I swear I am not a lesbian, but I have had offers where I was tempted.
It is a very large site with 968 videos and a very large network is included. When I took the tour before signing up I saw a lot of videos with stockings and pantyhose, so I thought what do I have to lose? The models use all kinds of toys and methods to get off. I saw a lot of dildos and wands. I also saw them using a pussy pump and wondered why would they do that? How would that feel? What I realized is that they do this to make their pussies look bigger and more inviting for men to look at. I did not find pumped pussies to be sexy and I think men would like this type of scene more than I did. I like to see wet pussies shaking with real earth moving orgasms.
The models are Eastern European pros who were mostly very much eye candy. But as I watched more and more videos I realized their looks were hit and miss. Many did nothing for me. They often seemed like they were just going through the motions and lacked enthusiasm. In most scenes I thought they had real orgasms, but they rarely seemed to be having fun. I like masturbation scenes with models losing themselves in the heat of the moment, maybe even to the point of forgetting they are on camera.
To the site’s credit I must add that I saw a fair amount of anal play and even some dp. Since many of the scenes can only be called extreme, there were many that were exciting to watch. There are just so many scenes that I did find quite a few worth keeping. I also discovered Ria Sunn, a blond beauty that I thought was just too pretty to ignore. I am a big fan of hers after seeing her here.
I think 80 is fair score as it is a very large site at a low price.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Pegging and anti-pegging action
163 scenes but is no longer updating.
Sexy male and female models. Including many mainstream models.
Has some of the first mainstream pegging scenes, dated as 2000.
Video quality varies, but most of the scenes have at least a 720p option, the newest ones have 1080p, the oldest ones are maxed at 480p.
Scenes also have photo downloads and the videos are usually long (anti-pegging causes longer)
Cons:
No new updates, the older video quality is not very good.
This will never be a niche for everyone.
Bottom Line:
I believe the best pegging site is Divine Bitches on Kink's Network. For those that don't know what pegging is it is when a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man anally. Anti-pegging is considered his reward of getting to have sex with her after she is finished. I think the first mainstream male performer willing to do pegging was Christian XXX. He was also one of the first mainstream male performers willing to do scenes with transsexuals. He has a lot of scenes on this site including the oldest scene from 2000. While pegging hasn't ever had a big following this site surprised even me with mainstream female stars like Jynx Maze, Kristina Rose, Brooklyn Lee and Megan Foxx taking on the role of the pegger.
I do think the better scenes on this site are as good as Divine Bitches scenes. Pegging isn't something I have tried, but it does seem sadistically erotic to think a man would even want to have sex with a woman after she used a strap-on on him and I do believe that is a strong part of my attraction to the pegging scenes. Being from India, the mention of sticking something up a man's butt would get you possibly stoned -- and I'm not talking about drugs. The guys in these scenes are all common performers in this niche and most of them are very masculine, handsome guys.
There are 163 scenes to download or stream. The site looks like a lot of niche sites. There are some scenes from the early 2000s, things picked up around 2010 and started slowing back down around 2014-15. More than half of the videos have 720p and around 1/3 have 1080p as the highest download option. The rest have 480p as their max resolution. Divine Bitches is the same way when it comes to resolution quality. A lot of their best scenes are only available in 480p.
I believe this site is a good representation of what is known as "fair play". If she gets to stick that dildo up your butt, you get to have sex with her. I know this is an assumption on my part, but I think the sex with the female receiving looks more real after she has stuck the dildo up the guy's butt. I don't know if maybe they form some kind of otherworldly bond from the role reversal, but the scenes are all good and worth downloading for fans of pegging and anti-pegging. I can only recommend it to those who know pegging and like it. For anyone else, maybe take a peek at it and see if you think you would like it.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful models stretching themselves out for all variations of masturbation.
Long, slow becoming fervor masturbation that clearly shows orgasms.
404 scenes with updates seeming to stop 2 months ago.
The site is easy to use with simple searches or complicated if you want to jump into the advanced search.
The scenes include a long video (by masturbation standards) and photo set. Downloads are unlimited.
No ads that I have seen.
Cons:
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I see this type of site as being something porn fans will either love or dislike, not hate. You are going to see a lot of spread pussies. There is some teasing. There is some anal play. There is a beautiful model in the same setting as the previous beautiful model spreading her pussy, teasing and possibly playing anally. Some of the models seem to be made for this kind of porn. Their scenes are very good. They love being watched, they love teasing, they love you seeing them having an orgasm. I think if that sounds good to you, you will love the site. If you need more than one person you will probably dislike the site.
It makes me think a site like this is where every gynecologist found their interest in becoming a gynecologist! I do see a site like this as female-positive. The models look stunning, you would not expect them to jump up in a chair and start spreading their legs looking like they do. They look more like they are going out on a nice date. Hopefully, someone bought them a nice dinner before they put on these performances.
The video quality is great, but inconsistent. Of the newest updates, two of the 4 newest do not have 4K, while the other 40-50 do have 4K. That makes me think they may have recycled old scenes. That was a newer term to me until recently. If you are interested in the 4K versions of these videos, you better have a lot of hard drive space and a fast internet connection as some of those are as big as 15 Gigabytes per scene. They do offer lower, in my opinion, better options with the 720p and 1080p versions. The photos add a nice touch. These photos show the model before the scene starts.
There are some unbelievable insertions, but those are in the older scenes. One has a woman masturbating with a baseball bat! The camerawork is a positive or negative for the site. There are a lot of close-ups. I believe close-ups during masturbation are only good if the model is rubbing her clitoris. If her fingers are inside her or a toy is inside her it doesn't make much sense to me to go close-up. I would classify this as a fetish site even though there are no definitive fetishes being played to unless, the pussy, is a fetish. All you need to ask yourself is do you want to look at 400 pussies? That is why I said I don't think any porn fan would hate the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Over 950 solo scenes of mostly attractive US and Euro girls pleasuring themselves.
Straightforward site design and navigation, with scenes listed as pages of thumbnails showing title, release date, pussy type and rating. Scenes can be filtered by multiple category tags of which there are many. Search function works well.
Site works well on mobile devices with previous and next scene links in scene detail page.
Scene detail page provide streaming, downloading and viewing photo slideshow, also model name, release date and scene duration. Can rate the scene, leave comments and add scene to favourites. Clicking model name brings up the her info page showing detailed info and her scenes.
Model gallery shows a list of paged thumbnails with alphabetic filtering, or can filter by pussy type. Can also select model name from dropdown list. Model thumbnails also feature pussy close-up.
Cons:
PROS (cont'd)
Videos can be downloaded as 1080p, 720p, 480p and 320p, photosets can be downloaded as ZIP files, either high or low quality.
Good download speeds with no download limits and downloaded videos are good quality with reasonable file size.
Membership discount via PU and other links found with google.
Easy signup and subscription cancellation via Vendo (but see cons).
CONS
Signup page a little confusing - the username and password fields are pre-filled with random username and password, but you can just delete those and choose your own, so long as each are at least six characters long.
Pre-checked cross-sells on sign-up page.
Links to pages are a bit slow - clicking a link results in 5 or so second pause before the page loads, but once loaded the page is responsive.
The filter tags are not alphabetically sorted, making location the tag you want more difficult.
Scene listing thumbnails don't indicate which scenes are favourites.
At 1600x1071, high quality photos aren't.
Bottom Line:
If you're a pussy worshipper then you'll love this site, though but I do think the Pussypedia feature is just a gimmick to distinguish it from other sites. Oddly the scene detail pages don'tmention the pussy classification at all.
It also includes access to other sites in the Puffy Network which is the parent site.
The site is easy to use and functional though I found the tagged categories to be sometimes inaccurate when using them to track down scenes I'd be interested in, so you're probably better off just browsing all the scenes and picking from that. Having said that, I'd rather have the option of selecting scenes by tag than not have.
The Pussypedia classifies a woman's pussy as either Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry - the detailed descriptions for each are interesting enough but at the end of the day, I'm less focussed on the type of pussy and more focussed on the woman as a whole, hence my opinion that it's a marketing gimmick for the site - I'm sure others will disagree :)
About the scenes:
-scenes are solo, starting off with the girl stripping and playing with herself, using her fingers or a selection of toys. Some scenes feature no toys at all, just the girl using her fingers to stimulate her clit or finger her pussy or asshole.
-there are a few DP scenes in that the girl has something stuck in either hole whilst fingering or thrusting something else into the other hole.
-due to the selection of toys, there's plenty of variety in the all solo scenes, though I did spot at least one scene where the camera man's fingers make an appearance to finger or play with the girl's pussy.
The featured toys/tools range from large to small dildos, large and small suction devices (which for a Puffy Peach distends the pussy quite a bit), some speculum-type inserts that open up the pussy for an interesting look inside whilst at the same time stimulating the labia, to vibrators used to stimulate the clit or inside pussy and clit simultaneously.
-some toys are large and fill her pussy or ass, others are slender/shiny which tend to be used in the ass.
-some scenes feature "chunky" balls on a string that are inserted and swallowed up one-by-one by the pussy, then slowly pulled out using the tiny bit of string dangling outside. Some scenes feature an inflatable dildo.
-usually the scenes end with the girl cumming and sometimes pissing.
-scenes average about 20 minutes long, though some are over 30 minutes and some are as short as 10 minutes. For the lingerie lovers out there, quite a few scenes feature stockings and panty-hose which for me, nearly always adds to the hotness.
-scenes are well produced and good technical quality, with good camera angles and close-ups of the pussy action.
-some scenes feature pissing, which some folk will like but it's not really for me, but having said that, when a girl cums she'll often need to pee so I guess it's all part of the action in some cases.
The photosets are the weakest part of the site, with no proper high-quality/resolution photosets available and the so-called high quality option maxing out at 1600x1071 pixels. The low quality pics are 1000x666. Compared with other sites the photos aren't that well lit but as someone more interested in the scene videos, I'm not too bothered about the photos but I mention them here for those for whom photo quality is important.
The signup page offers a choice of full access (USD 9.95 for 30 days, recurring at USD 29.95), streaming only (USD 9.95 per month recurring) or a PAYG option where you purchase tokens used to buy individual scenes, which seems a crazy option given that the smallest number of tokens cost USD 19.95 - to be honest I didn't notice the latter options when signing up and just went with the default full access option for 9.95, which is great value.
Considering the content and price, I recommend this site overall, particularly as it includes the rest of the Puffy Network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with the five site Puffy Network.
Interesting pussy classification system.
Pretty big site, 953 videos, with lots to love about it.
Lots of great looking women
Special price on PU of only $14.95 for a month
I loved Lady Dee, what a woman.
Cons:
I saw mostly white women but this is ok. More variety is better.
Bottom Line:
Just the other day there was a poll that asked “How do you like your pussy?” I answered “wet and juicy”. This site is Wet and Puffy and it also answers the question. It is all about hot girls getting off by masturbating. It gives a new meaning to do it yourself.
It comes with Puffy Network, but the other four sites are not ones I cared about as they are focused on women and men having sex together.
One thing I found to be fun was that they have a great way to search by types of pussy.
These are the three pussy types they have on the site: big taco, juicy cherry and puffy peach. I have never heard of doing this and I think this is very creative and original. I have a pretty good idea of what each of these are. Within these you can do a detail search using hairy, pussy piercing, shaved and trimmed pussy. My first choice is hairy juicy cherry. Yummy.
The models get themselves off by using all kinds of dildos, pussy spreaders, toys inserted both vaginal and anal, anal beads and pussy pumps. The action includes lots of pussy close ups, panty play, and my favorite one, which is opening up those pussy lips and stretching them.
The orgasms look realistic and not fake, unlike many porn sites. This is very much 100% on the hot meter. I think they had a lot of fun making these scenes and I am glad they shared the fun with me and you.
The women are mostly white, and very thin. I loved Apolonia, a Latina from Spain with a Juicy Peach pussy, who had one scene and adored Chloe Lamour, three scenes, who also looks Latina and her pussy is Big Taco. My favorite though was Lady Dee who has a vaguely exotic and very special Asian look. I want to see a lot more of her in lesbian scenes. She has a high level of sexy enthusiasm that I can’t take my eyes off. She had only one scene with her Juicy Cherry pussy that I couldn’t take my eyes off.
The only black models I found were Luna Corazon and Luciana, but they don’t do anything for me.
The site is very friendly to use and anyone can find anything they want without much effort.
They have 953 videos as of today. That is enough to keep me busy for a lot longer than a month, but they are having a deal right now that is a bargain. For only $14.95 you can download all you want for thirty days.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Quite possibly the most genuine porn in terms of performer enjoyment that I've ever come across.
Great diversity in body types of the performers - something for everyone.
Huge amount of content that can be streamed or downloaded. Archive of video clips totaling 5427 according to the site, dating back to 2006, and all around 5 to 15 minutes long, with HD option offered on videos since 2009.
Frequent updates - appears to be daily while I've been a member.
Community forum that's contributed to by staff from site, the performers, and members.
Cons:
Unable to search videos by niche.
Many of the performer's videos are released as a part 1 and 2. This doesn't take away from the quality of either part as a stand alone video, this site generally ensures at least 1 orgasm happens in each vid - but it looks like there's often a week long gap between both parts being released, even though they were both shot from the same performance.
Bottom Line:
This site makes a point of using genuine amateurs for the most part, and letting them masturbate however they want to capture how they best achieve self orgasm. The resulting content, in my opinion, is 2nd to none in both the female masturbation niche, and in terms of depicting women genuinely having a great time and getting off.
I found the lack of being able to search by niche a little disappointing. They do somewhat make up for this by having a 'List of Lists' section on their forum, where they encourage members and performers to make their own lists of videos with desired niches (i.e. body types, squirting, toys, etc.). I do appreciate why they've gone this route - likely taking the view that all performers add equal value to the site and their vids deserve to be enjoyed rather than categorized, but I personally would've liked the option.
None the less - it's difficult to be too critical of the most genuine porn I've come across. If you're after female masturbation videos, look no further!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the most realistic, most believable and most natural porn site on the internet.
- 5,408 scenes of mostly solo masturbation but also has lesbian and some male/female.
- I've been a member here off and on for over 10 years.
- Uses GMBill, a lesser known biller but I've never had any problems with them.
- Updates daily, sometimes twice.
- Women of nearly all shapes, size and looks.
- Navigation takes some getting used to but I've been a member enough that it's pretty easy to use and find what you're looking for.
- Scenes vary from closeups of the model's face to more explicit scenes that show everything.
- Defines the word erotic in the porn world better than any other site.
- Very high technical quality on videos, see bottom line.
- Categories that make it easy to find what you're looking for once you get used to the names of the categories.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max)
Cons:
- It can be overwhelming. The model list is next to impossible to use to count the models.
- Will apply to any and everyone that joins it, there will be some models you won't find attractive.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I gave this site an 85. That was also when most of the content just focused on the model's face and showed very little nudity. I enjoyed some of those scenes but thought it was too soft which is unheard of from me. I even like non-nude "porn".
The scenes have become more explicit though nowhere near as explicit as most sites. There's a connection, for me, between the model and her willingness to be more explicit, to be more vocal and that's a selling point for me. It's women enjoying themselves naturally and most look very comfortable doing it. I don't even know if that's true. Maybe the ones that just show their face/expressions/moans just aren't in the mood to show more on that day.
I do lean towards and favor the ones that show more. Some of them will pull up porn on their laptop and masturbate while watching it. Which kind of makes me laugh a little since I think it shows us men are more impatient than women. You never see them fast forwarding. I also like the minimal production, the lighting, I have bad eyesight and it gets worse when looking at bright lights. The scenes are very good for those into voyeurism.
The numbers can be a little confusing. With 5,408 videos, I'm using their number on that, this is a very large site. They have 2,269 scenes listed as studio. 1,208 listed as fantasy and adventure. 898 listed as homemade. 411 as close-up. 377 as video diary. 157 as lucubrations and 88 as loose ends.
Most of those are self-explanatory. The loose ends ones are shorter, there's outdoor pissing, talking, and as shown by the number this is a very small part of the site. The video diary ones once fooled me into thinking they were interviews but they're not. All that I've watched are masturbation including some exhibitionism.
The video quality on the newest scenes tops out at 1080p, there's also a 540p version and a 270p version. The scenes are short enough that most of the 1080p versions are at or around 500MB each.
Graphic descriptions usually aren't needed for porn but one of my biggest fetishes is hard nipples. You can watch scenes here where you can see the models nipples getting harder. This content is now very appealing to me. My last review of it was during a period of my porn journey that favored and preferred hardcore content. Now, I can see, hear and enjoy this porn possibly the way it's supposed to be.
I didn't list this as a con only because I think it would detract from the scenes, there are no pictures. Most of these models look like they've got themselves ready to go and perform, so throwing in "how about we take 150 photos real quick" might break that momentum.
It's also one of the few sites that has bios for the models that seem real. They list their favorite books, movies and music. Depending on your own taste in those, you can pick up on one for example, saying she's an ABBA fan.
I do like the girl/girl scenes as these seem to be very believable, a major selling point in lesbian porn but really don't care for the male/female scenes.
I think it would be easy for some to miss the model search feature. I know it's right there but it is very in-depth. I use the nationality filter to look for models that fit a look I usually prefer like Brazil where I found Ana B who might be one of the most expressive and active models on the site. Even giving the view of her masturbating on her stomach. If you're patient with the model search you find out it's very useful. You can pick nationality, type of scene (solo, friends), even age range.
If you're going to complain about anything on it I would say the layout, having 513 pages of 10 scenes per page is overwhelming. Use the model search. They do list the model's name and if you click it you can see all of the model's scenes which at least lets you focus on the models you like best.
I don't think this is a site you can really take in over one month. I'm thinking it's going to take me 3 months to get everything I want.
It's a good example of why it's so hard to score a site a 100. There are just minor problems that stop it from being perfect. On a personal note, I would like to see a few more Asians. And looking for them showed another minor problem, the older, I would even say oldest scenes are 480p. I found that when I found a Japanese model from 2008.
Beyond those minor complaints this is a site that does erotic better than all the sites I see promoting themselves as erotic. I also want to mention I haven't hit any download limits but haven't download more than 10GB or so in any of my days as a member.
Great site, now if I can just get myself to cancel it after another month or two.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-03-2003:21am (Update History) Reason: Score was updated as site webmaster cleared up some details
Pros:
-Countdown timer till next release and the next 3 releases are shown with release dates. It looks like they release one video a day
-Advertise 5300 videos and as far as I can tell, over 450 models
-Videos have upload date
-Can download videos and add to favourites
-Have an advanced search option
-Great mics for picking up the little sounds like pants zips and vibrators
-Models don’t look at the camera, they are too busy having a good time with themselves which is sexier than trying to please the camera
Cons:
-Videos were not as clear as they should be with HD. Unsure if it was my connection though
-No photo sets
-Only 12 videos are displayed on a page at a time
-Can’t comment on videos or models
-Videos with multiple models are on the site multiple times. If it’s a threesome it’s there three times, which pads out content a lot. (their ‘friends’ category has 660 videos but they’re all copies so they maybe only have 350 separate videos) - edit: I have since been told that listing the same video multiple times doesn't affect the total video count
Bottom Line:
IFM is a site dedicated to the female orgasm. A lot of the videos are shot in their studio, which is a bed with white sheets. Their camera shots are good and they have a camera on the ceiling looking down on the model on the bed. Their mics are high quality and so you can hear all the sounds like zippers, buttons, moans, vibrators, those juicy wanking noises..
The videos are quite short at around 10min and are organised into different categories which are displayed on the left sidepanel. The categories have odd names like unseen (videos I haven’t yet seen, you can mark videos as ‘seen’), lubrications (model interview), loose ends (extra footage), friends (pair and group sex). Others are ‘studio’ and ‘homemade’ (obvious) and ‘fantasy and adventure’ ie in places that are not bedrooms. Not all models have a lubrication video but as far as I could see, most have a model page which you can find through ‘video profiles’. Here each model has a video of them talking about themselves, and the profile links to all their videos. A good touch. You can’t comment on models or videos but they have a forum that is very active and the moderators and contributors are also active on it.
Although it’s very nice to see women getting off by themselves enjoying some alone time, by the nature of the site it’s very same same and I am more likely to watch only a few videos at a time than spend hours because of this. They also have quite a few videos of GG or group sex. There were even some videos with GB. I enjoyed this as it was something different but it was unexpected because of the site’s name.
All in all it’s a nice site that's videos are focussed on personal intimacy, connection with the models, and the little details.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Vendo, Segpay, or CCBill.
--Updates once a week
-The video and photo archives number 942 scenes
-The best video quality is 4K
-Photo quality is 3400x2300. At least 100 photos per set.
-A list 20 something, thin Euro porn stars
-All scenes have great production values
-There are no download limits.
-Easy to follow, logical site layout
Cons:
-The site selects your user name and passwords randomly. I don’t consider this a major con, just an annoying one.
-Updates scroll down endlessly. Works better on a cell phone or tablet than on a pc.
Bottom Line:
Wet and Puffy is a site that focuses on female masturbation scenes. Female friends of mine that like porn, find the videos stimulating and enjoy watching them. Porn producers take note-they want and are looking for a site comparable to this with straight men masturbating. The ones that exist are not interesting as they for gay men.
Speaking as a heterosexual man, I liked the site. The models use dildos of various sizes and types, metal spreaders, toy insertions both vaginal and anal, anal beads and pussy pumps which is very unusual and make the pussy look huge. The only thing I would have liked to have seen are scenes with speculums. The action includes lots of pussy close ups, camel toe panty play, labia stretching, and pissing.
The filters for the site give a pretty good idea of what you will get. These are the categories and how many scenes get these tags.:
Big Taco 186, hairy 17, juicy cherry 169, puffy peach 174, pussy piercing 9, shaved 603, shaved pussy 189, trimmed 188, and trimmed pussy 71. Three pussy types are big taco, juicy cherry and puffy peach. They promote the site as the only pussy classification website on the internet.
Most of the models are thin Eastern European porn stars but a few are from Western Europe or the US. Mostly the models are in their twenties and are most definitely well known professionals and not amateurs. Some I recognized are Antonia Sainz, Chloe Lamour, Angel Wicky, Chrsity Charming, Vinna Reed, Angel Piaf, Francys Belle, Charlotte Sartre, Ria Sun, Victoria Sweet, Gina Gerson, Apolonia, Luna Corazon, Eva Berger, Arwen Gold, Rachelle Richey, Marley Brinx, Lady Dee, Sindy Vega, Eufrat, Lorena, Beata, Abby Cat, Mia Melone, Miela aka Marry Queen, Nikky Thorne, Satin Bloom, Caprise, and Zafira, This is quite a quality lineup.
Updates are once a week and the archive is huge with over 942 scenes. The site layout is easy to follow and the downloads had no broken links or download limits. There is ability to use advanced searching, which is using more than one tag. An example would be American, big taco, blond. Four scenes appear.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Arguably the most consistent and at this point, possibly the best non-hardcore, solo with some lesbian scenes, site on the internet.
- Updating roughly twice per week.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- One of the better ranges of races in models. Just in the last month they've had Asian, black, Indian, Latina and white models.
- Premier models, you rarely if ever see an unattractive model on this site.
- I personally like the tiered pricing. I do the $34.95 option and am always satisfied with the content I get with it.
- Video quality is crystal clear even on 720p, photo sets are just as good. Videos go up to 4K, but you have to choose that tier to get those (costs more).
- Production values, settings, outfits, lighting, camerawork, the models performances are all top-notch.
- Navigation is excellent and very easy to use.
- Will have to explain this one in the bottom line, will call it a "hard drive of their own".
Cons:
- Some won't like the tiered memberships. I will try to explain them with examples of what you can get with them.
- Videos are in parts, this is something I've gotten used to and don't mind since there are some parts I wouldn't watch anyway.
Bottom Line:
In the Crack has consistently scored over 95 for me. I just don't know of a site that makes one great scene after another and it's something I've mentioned before, there are models here that I never paid much attention to on other sites. Their content here is much better. Ashley Fires is the best example.
The tiered pricing. The first thing to know is the first time I joined In the Crack, I want to say 2007 or 2008, it was $34.95. I don't remember if they had download limits back then or not. The $34.95 option is what I still join. It gives you all photos, view and download (small and large sizes), it gives you all video download options except 4K. The download limit with it is 10GB per hour, 30GB per day and 300GB per month.
Since the videos are split into parts, I'll use the newest Cindy Starfall, I download the 720p versions. All four parts that make up the full scene are a combined 1.1GB. That's for right at 40 minutes of video. If I went up to 1080p it would be around 2.3GB for those 4 parts.
If you're content with 720p, you can realistically download 250 or so models scenes in a month. Which goes back to the pro I call, "hard drive of their own". I have every In the Crack scene up to January 2019 that I want. I join once a year and can easily get the all of that year's scenes and stay under the download limit. I actually think I could do the 1080p versions and stay under it.
What it amounts to is if you have no In the Crack collection, you might as well take the plunge and join the unlimited for a month. It's $69.95 and you can download all you want including 4K. Their scenes date back to 2001. Once you're caught up, you can easily get by with the $34.95 membership once per year and get caught up.
The models here are not only some of the prettiest on any site they do more here, there's anal play from models that normally don't. There's very hard masturbation from models that normally don't. There are flexibility poses, sexy outfits, there's so little to complain about, I had to find two cons that other people might be bothered by.
I wouldn't call this a glam site since the actions within the site are not what you see on glam sites. But the models are typically made up very nicely and many of them look like they're about to go on a really nice date. The photo sets are a big part of my enjoyment. The Cindy Starfall photo set has around 80 pictures. Of the first 10 photos she's fully dressed, looking really cute and sexy, the next 15-20 have her sexually provocative poses with only her hose stopping you from seeing her fully nude ass and pussy, then the rest of the set she's removed the hose and eventually is fully nude and masturbating. That is a lost art in today's porn. There's posing, teasing, fully clothed, and everything that made pre-tube site "nude, nude, nude" hardcore porn, great.
They have 1,591 scenes, usually a minimum of 30-40 minutes of video in each of those and a photo set with each.
The one change that I have noticed is the scenes continue to go away from the gynecological style the site was known for in the earlier days. They still live up to their name of In the Crack with some extreme close-ups, including during masturbation but you spend more time looking at the outside of the model's orifices than than the inside of them. It's like taking a very artsy site with all the beauty those bring and deciding to suddenly make it a hardcore masturbation site.
Very few sites can pull this style off and I'm certain at this point that none have been doing it longer than In the Crack. On those tiered prices, something I always thought was a nice option for those that haven't been a member is the $9.95 option. You can view the small pictures and stream the SD versions of the videos. That's better than most sites trials and it's 30 days with no limitations on how much you stream. They also have a $24.95 option that lets you download up to the 720p versions, but you can't download the pictures. I do think the $44.95 tier is a problem. It adds 4K downloads but you still have a download limit and those files are huge. I think if you have to have 4K, you might as well join the unlimited plan. I'm completely fine and content with the 720p version and downloadable photo zips so the $34.95 one works fine for me.
They have over 1,000 models and the top models have more than one scene. I think Jynx Maze has 4 and I would rate those 4 scenes in her top 10 scenes of her entire career. Cindy Starfall is another, you could look over my reviews and see where I've mentioned her over the years. Her scenes here at In the Crack are the best of her career. They work some kind of magic there.
I'll end by saying this is one of 3 sites that I could see scoring 100. I haven't ever done that but while not perfect for everyone, they're very close to perfect for me. Highly recommended for those that love to see beautiful, naked women in their most spread open and bent over poses.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Women using dildos on men in more of a dominant way or as a way to get him what he wants from her.
152 scenes make it look to be another site that’s recycling, the 2015 TBP review lists over 200 scenes. It’s still a rare niche.
Decent but inconsistent video quality, I guess these are maybe from DVDs?
Includes photo sets that are downloadable.
CCBill is the billing processor.
Cons:
The same problem I had on another site from this network. The newer videos are lower resolution than the older videos and there seems to be videos missing based on past TBP counts.
Have noticed at least 3 scenes here that’s on another of their pegging sites.
Keeps logging me out and requiring my to login with a username and password they generated which is a mixture of letters of numbers that I have no way of remembering.
Bottom Line:
This is my preferred sub-niche of the pegging niche. Not all, but the majority of the scenes are based around the man wanting to touch or have sex with the much more attractive female model. She turns it into a dominant situation where she will let him touch her, have a little sex with her – if, he lets her use a dildo on his ass.
These scenes as a whole look newer than the other pegging scenes on this network. The female models are more attractive, and some may even be porn stars. It is still hampered by the lower video quality with many of the scenes, but there are more 720p scenes on this site than any of the network’s other pegging sites.
These “couples” don’t look like couples. It looks more like a man and woman on a date, he’s overwhelmed by how much more attractive she is than him and is even more surprised when they go in his house or her house. She teases a little then whips out the dildo. Kink’s Divine Bitches is the mistress of this niche. But the scenes here are pretty good. They are not long which is something I’ve noticed with this network. You will rarely see a video over 15 minutes.
These scenes almost all feature the woman eventually getting fully nude and “allowing” the man to give her oral and to touch or suck her boobs. I think if you’re into this niche it’s a very good alternative to Divine Bitches and is one of the better sites I’ve found on the Ferro Network. There is the recycling part, but the scenes are new to me. The photo sets are a good bonus. You have short videos that even in 720p are rarely over 300MB and my collection of women sticking dildos in men continues to grow! I don’t think the cons here would stop a person from joining it. The niche itself does that. Those into this niche will look over the cons.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the LetsDoeIt network. Network has 17 channels (down from over 40 channels previously). All channels are open, there are no premium channels you have to pay extra for.
-The network features hardcore porn. The selection of models range from attractive to fucking gorgeous. The White Boxxx is the crown jewel of the network, because the channel features gorgeous models presented in a glamcore setting that showcases the models in erotic videos.
-You can choose to use a credit card or paypal to join.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Vendo site is easy to use, easy to cancel.
-You choose your password, instead of computer-generated.
-Join, login, and member pages are https.
-Navigation is easy. Easy to switch between channels.
-PU lists a discounted price of $9.95/month (recurring). PU also lists$99.95/year. But when I hit the link to LetsDoeIt, it showed a price of $79.95/year, and I joined at that price.
-The content is exclusive.
Cons:
-2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-Slow download speeds. I average 1 Mbps on my WIFI network. When I do an internet speed test, I get anywhere from 15-90 Mbps. So I get very slow download speeds for video files. It's not a problem with the photo sets, because the photo set files are so small (only 6 photos per photo set).
My internet connection is supposed to 200 Mbps from Spectrum. That is the hard-wired speed, not the WIFI speed (WIFI is always slower than a hardwired connection).
-I get a lot of failed video downloads from the site. Don't know what is causing the problem. Not only are the download speeds slow, but they often fail, which reduces the download limit you're allowed, because a failed download is counted the same as a successful download.
-Quest For Orgasm is an archive site. Last video was added 2017-09-04. That's a shame because they have some really lovely models.
-The channel only has 80 videos.
-There is a download limit of 100 videos/month for the network.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The network has a lot of beautiful models. Not all videos will appeal to every PU member, but there are a lot of videos that are worth saving.
-Each video has an accompanying photo set, but the photo sets are tiny.
The photo sets I downloaded only had 6 photos per set.
Some of these models are lovely to gorgeous. They deserve a larger photo set.
-The photo sets only download in one definition. No choice of high, medium or low.
-The name of each photo set appears to be computer generated. Example file names are 5e00e2d6d6379 and 5e00e2d6d6379. So you have to manually re-name the file to show the site, model, video title, date posted.
-There is very little personal details about the model listed. Name of model, country of origin, a brief description her body(which can be misleading or wrong).
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site features lovely models masturbating to orgasm.
There isn't much variety in the sex action.
You have a solo girl, and she's masturbating.
Usually with a sex toy (a small or large vibrator, but also fingers or a dildo).
The main attraction is how lovely some of these girls are.
The videos run from 20 to 30 minutes.
They usually start off with a brief interview of the model, who states where she lives, some activities she likes to do, hobbies, etc.
The girls are presented as girl-next-door types, not porn stars.
Just girls who have a normal, healthy appetite for sex.
Which they are satisfying with masturbation. Since there are no boy-girl or girl-girl scenes at this channel.
Some of the interviews can be interesting.
The interview can be 10 minutes or less.
The models speak freely.
They seem to be giving their real thoughts, what's it's like to be a porn model, having sex as a job. So you get a connection to the girls, which makes it more real than just watching a porn video.
These are European models, who come from Russia, Czech, Serbia, Spain, etc.
So if you have a partner, you can always claim that you joined the site because you wanted to learn more about people from Europe.
This network is very educational, because I look up the countries to see where the beautiful girls are coming from. And with the way countries are splitting and new ones are emerging, I need wikipedia to show me what's what.
Jessica Spielberg is labelled as "slim, small natural tits." She is a lovely model. But I would describe her as normal build, not slim. And her breasts are medium-sized, not small.
She has one video at Quest For Orgasm, another video at Bitches Abroad.
She is presented as a lovely, adorable girl at Quest For Orgasm.
Just fucking lovely.
I may be crazy, but she's so innnocent-looking in her Quest for Orgasm video, where she reaches several orgasms masturbating.
In the Bitches Abroad video, she comes across a little differently.
She's a tourist looking at a map of Prahal (Czech for Prague), and she asks a guy for directions.
The guy is Kristof Cale, who offers to help find her destination, but first he takes her to his apartment; he tells her he has to change his clothes before he will show her where to go.
At his apartment, she starts to eat a pastry he gives her, and he starts to get undressed in front of her. She walks forward to look at his exposed cock, and she offers him a bite of the pastry he gives her, they start kissing, he takes the pastry away and throws it on the floor, and BOOM! It's time for sex.
Maybe I'm missing the point. Is this a European thing, where you skip the preliminaries, and go for hard-and-fast fucking?
Or maybe this is the European version of seduction.
I definitely need a European vacation, where I can find a model like Jessica Spielberg.
I'm giving the channel a score of 78.
The slow download speeds are irritating.
The failed downloads are irritating.
The tiny number of photos in a photo set (6 photos per set) is poor. Some of these models are lovely, and deserve larger photo sets.
This is an archive site. Stopped updating in September 2017.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Spizoo network (10 sites)
- multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones)
- Plenty of great talent some of my favorites are: Krissy Lynn, Karma Rx, Dana Dearmond, Alliya Hadid, CHERIE DEVILLE! AALIYAH LOVE!
- 270 scenes October 5, '19
- Exclusive scenes
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix) and the photoshoots (about 300 pix
Cons:
PRO CONT:
- Search works well even though there are a lot of videos I was able to locate something I'd found earlier with relative ease.
- More diversity than most sites (in terms of ethnicity not body type)
- Scenes are well let and have good sound so you get all the action
- Interviews are well done.
CONS:
- Very limited update schedule. There was one in September. The one before that was April, the one before that March. While there are multiple updates a week in the network - the site is very lacking.
- Adds behind the paywall, constant drumbeat of "buy more"
- .wmv only available in 480p format
- No unique "hook". This is cookie cutter porn. I like sites that have more of a personality and niche.
- If you're gonna be an "also ran" run of the mill network you've got to have a lot of content. They're not there yet
- Only 15 videos load/page. This means more loading and less enjoying
Bottom Line:
Pornstar tease does a nice job of highlighting a female talent. She gets to have all the focus on her before driving you crazy. It's a good angle and it works (well for me anyway)
The biggest problem is there isn't any personality in the site. They don't have a good niche and it feel like any other porn site. I wish they'd "develop voice" or something.
That said they do run a good site with good production and fast downloads. There's nothing to complain about - there's also nothing to rave about. (although I will say I've been introduced to new girls I haven't seen before while still enjoying my favorites - can I say CHERIE DEVILLE again!?) 😃 😍
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
