Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
I just want to thank the jerk that took these pictures and videos Upskirts, somehow, some way, are an underrated niche in porn
The production of these scenes is extraordinary, especially the clothing choices
Extremely high quality video and picture downloads
Beautiful British models with their sexy accents
Lots of niches are tapped into especially ones involving panties
Cons:
Never seen this as a con, but I thnk it’s a good one to mention. Most porn we see these days is made in America. Upskirt Jerk is from the UK and there is an adjustment to make.
I can see some porn fans not appreciating the amount of tease and lack of action.
Bottom Line:
Where oh where has this site been? I love upskirts and have for, I’m guessing, most of life. If you have ever said that or felt it, do yourself a favor and join this site. Just use that as a TL;DR.
Upskirt Jerk also brings the quality. There are plenty of 4K downloads and if not, you still can download in HD. Once I realized just how underrated and underrepresented upskirts are, I caught a glimpse of how big this site is. Upwards of 2,500 videos and a similar number of photosets. It had me rethinking my opinion of how underrated and underrepresented this classic niche was. After a few months of membership, I feel confident in calling it underrepresented.
Maybe, the con I used, could be a pro or con depending on the reader. I don’t know if there is a consensus feeling on this, but non-American sites do seem to have figured out how to do some things better. The outfits are such a huge factor for this niche. The scenes can be changed by simply having a model in a sexy skirt with panties “accidentally” slid over. I believe that is called a wardrobe malfunction or a perfect porn photo op.
While watching the videos from Upskirt Jerk, I did, at times, wonder what the scenes would be like with a man or even woman joining the model. After much thinking, I’ve come to the belief, nothing more is needed. The majority of these models likely make a living off shooting porn like Upskirt Jerk has. These women are so experienced in showing us their upskirts, you never know what they’re going to do to expose their panties.
This site could seem to be a little overrated, but it’s not. They nail the technical quality, the quality of models, the clothing and they live up to their title of Upskirt Jerk. While ti’s clear the scenes are planned out, the innocence and simple act of doing an upskirt, reminds us, a lot of young women like their bodies stared at and wanted.
The biggest connundrum you’re going to find yourself in is how to join the site. It is part of one of the best networks I have ever seen. You can join just Upskirt Jerk for $29.95 a month, or you can join their network for $49.95 a month. The network not only includes Upskirt Jerk, but also has the equally as teasing, Wank it Now and the outsdaning Bopping Babes, plus severlal others. I do believe the network is the better deal and better way to go, but I just had a membership to Bopping Babes a few months ago.
The next time I join it, I plan on joining the entire network. I will just make sure not to join any of their sites until I join the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- You ever join a site and watch a video on it and say, "Oh my goodness"? This site did that to me.
- Upskirts, panties, hose, more teasing than I think I've ever seen on a porn site.
- Very high quality on videos and photos.
- They touch on several fetishes from clothes to upskirts to women just being sexy.
- More dirty talking than an Eddie Murphy comedy show.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- Easy site to navigate with no extra buttons or ads or any of the other annoying shit sites put on their sites these days.
- CCBill is the biller.
Cons:
- I think if you're looking for anything hardcore you'd be disappointed with this site.
- Some women are just not made for dirty talking or teasing. They'll be going fine until they start talking.
Bottom Line:
This site is easily at the top of the tease niche. Most of these women get so horny they have to restrain themselves from masturbating. Which might very well be the answer to why mainstream porn has lost a lot of its passion. They don't let the women tease enough. Five minutes into these videos you get the idea an ugly, fat guy or an ugly, skinny guy could walk in and get lucky.
That's the part of tease porn that is often missed by the viewer. Women in tease porn get hornier than women in hardcore porn. We're going into natural instincts and I would rather not go too deeply into that but if you like seeing women stripping, "performing" with upskirts, some with pretty panties, some with no panties and turning themselves on, you will love this site.
Here are the numbers:
207 models and I do know some of these are pros but many have that girl or Milf next door look.
2,095 photo sets and they are downloadable.
2,078 videos and they are downloadable with 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p all available on all 2,078 videos.
They're getting into that area of I don't have much to possibly complain about!
They also update daily and their models are a nice blend of "she's probably a pro model" to "she should be a pro model if she's not". Very attractive models they got me to sign up with the model Amiya Dreams.
Here's what to expect from these scenes:
Some nudity, a lot of upskirts and teasing, some masturbation, a lot of dirty talk and the one I think should be mentioned, they do have some scenes that go into "insulting" the man watching the scene. One of the models has a thing about holding her pinkie up and wiggling it while saying, "Do you just have a little cock?" and she sounds a lot like the Game of Thrones character Ygritte, she even has that same attitude.
I'm not trying to make jokes about British English but when they start saying the little cock part, I keep waiting on someone to say, "Would you like a spot of tea with your little cock?"
There will be those that believe this is not "porn enough". I like it a lot. I like the change of pace, seeing models performing with more than just their looks and their natural gifts they were born with.
As mentioned in the cons some of these women do struggle with the dirty talk and teasing. One seems just annoyed that she has to keep her panties on. The dirty talk from the ones that are not good at it ranges from, "Are you going to cum?" You don't ask questions when teasing! That means I have to stop and think about my answer.
There's so little difference in proper dirty talk and poor dirty talk. It can be said this way, she can say, "Are you going to cum?" or she can say, "I want you to cum for me". See the difference?
Overall, this is a great site with excellent technical quality especially for the tease fans and those that like seeing pretty women be pretty and not just dirty.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
12-06-1601:13pm (Update History) Reason: Updated information
Pros:
+ Daily updates
+ 640x386, 960x540, 1280x720, 1920x1080 and 3840x2160 mp4
+ Niche tag sorting with over 100 tags to choose from
+ Search function
+ Model index
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Forum for all sites in the wankbb.com network
+ Renews at a lower monthly rate
+ Network access available
Cons:
- Flash based picture viewing, no option for regular browser view
- Zip downloads necessary for full sized pictures
- Some models need some coaching in their "simulation" (See comments)
Bottom Line:
The premise here, in case it's not obvious, is that it's a jerk off encouragement site, with the models assuming various poses and occupations and talking dirty to you. Although there are a few more reserved models who keep it to "panty shots only", the majority, for lack of a better phrase, take it down to some good crotch shots. The models, for the most part, are attractive, in the 20s and 30s and include some names that you might have seen elsewhere. Tina Kay, Samantha Bentley, Cherry Blush to name a few. As far as the video goes, the only thing I found to knock the site for is how some of the models simulate stroking a guy. As I said on their forum, please tell some of the women to stop looking like they were rolling dice in a crap game.
THIS is how to set up a site! Straight forward navigation with every scene represented by a large thumbnail with title, date and running time. The layout is so simple yet detailed that it was easy to come up with the following without clicking into every scene to find out what's what:
The site was kicked off on October 21, 2014 with a 4K video, then for some strange reason went to 1080p video for a bit. On the 24th, going with 1920x1080HD, they added another. On the 29th, still in HD mode they kicked in 32 more. On the 31st and November 3, two more chunks with daily updates starting from there. With 4K video increasing in availability, the last time HD was the highest option was on April 27th, 2015. To be able to figure all of that out, a site has to be readily navigable. Finding what you want is definitely easy here.
Picture sets aren't as repetitive as so many sites seem to have, but the browser viewing quality just isn't there. Screencaps just never seem to cut it. To get the full sized pics, you have to download the zip. Then they're 3840 pixels long side - still average when compared to picture sites with 5000+ being more common.
I don't tend to spend a lot of time on site forums, but I did check it out. It does require a separate login, presumably because there appears to be people on it who aren't subscribed to any of the sites. It's also setup nicely, with sections for general chat, current models, scene requests, model suggestions and technical help. From what I can tell, the admins are quick to respond to the users AND to keep it civil.
Wankitnow, DownblouseJerk, UpskirtJerk, BoppingBabes and LingerieTales are all a part of this network and, as was pointed out to me by tangub, can be joined together for $49.95 a month with further discounts for longer subscriptions. I've been on all but LingerieTales. If the lingerie site is as good as the rest, I will say that these are all great sites to check out! A nice break from the world of gonzo and other run-of-the-mill porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Choice of billing companies. Available choices are CCBill, Segpay and Zombaio.
-True high definition videos at 1280x720.
-Works with download managers. Downloads were fast as the file sizes are under 100MB for at most five minutes.
-No download limits.
-New videos every day and recently a new set of around 30 photos are also being posted daily. As of today there are 239 videos and 1439 photos.
-Mostly very attractive women with nice legs. Even the paid models seem very natural and not glam. The feeling you get is that you may see these women in the street.
-The site offers a way to communicate with other members, invite a friend, create a profile and upload your own videos and photos. Nice features that so far are not being used.
Cons:
-Only one download choice, MP4. Maybe it is my computer, but I have trouble with that type of file. I converted the videos to AVI using AVI Media Converter.
-The photos do not have the option of being zipdownloaded.
-The most recent photos are only 1200x800. Not quality in todays porn.
-Practically no variety in the models. Nearly every one is white, thin and in their early 20s.
-Very softcore. Until recently the most you would see is a view of panties under a skirt.
Bottom Line:
This site has changed its focus over the nine months it has been online. The oldest videos show a cameraman following women on the streets around town. At some point he gets a camera into position close to the model and gets film of what the woman is wearing underneath. The feeling that comes across is of an invasion of privacy on unknowing women. I feel that the issue of consent is important and these scenes made me feel a bit uncomfortable. How the cameraman kept from getting hit by his victims or even arrested is a mystery. If these scenes were staged, they did a really good job of making them seem unscripted and unrehearsed.
Most scenes were filmed in Russia, as you can clearly see writing in their alphabet. Some scenes were filmed in Guatemala as well. I suspect they were filmed for another site as they often have watermarks for Spyguate, a name I don't recognize. The photos from this time are similar in theme and style.
More recently, there is a distinct change in style. Professional, non glam Russian models play up to the camera in unabashed exhibitionism. The models are attractive and create a good sexy show. There is some nudity, a lot of tease, making nice videos that make me want to watch them over and over. There is a pleasing balance of whole body and closeups. Many of the models have multiple videos, with different levels of tease and different locales.
The photo sets also have been featuring professionals in scenes that can only be described as exhibitionist. There is a feeling of sexiness, even in photos that are not totally nude.
My overall impression is of a site that has found its place as tease, with some partial nudity. The sexiness is undeniable. With daily updates, and a winning formula, I can see myself resubscribing.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Delivers high quality upskirt pics and vids
Can search by model name
Updates come frequently
Bonus material from their other sites (Pantymaniacs, etc)
Cons:
Most shoots have the same theme
Basically no outdoor shoots
Very little nudity
Hardly any shoots use thongs
Bottom Line:
Very good upskirt site that could cater more to, what they call 'American panties' (THONGS!). Some nudity would make this site even better. Also, could use more natural settings instead of their typical settings.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I was a member of this site about 3 monthes ago... it's a really huge collection of upskirt, panties, tight jeans and other voyeur and fetish content.. How i can see now - it was redesigned and updated sometime ago.. Now the index shows following info: PHOTOS: 64981 ; VIDEOS: 1281 - crazy amount.
Cons:
Right, it's a little bit hard to navigate inside ,cause too many sections , too much content...
Bottom Line:
I think that's worth too pay if you 're the real fan of those niches and you don't need to communicate with other members, cause Upskirt Collection still didn't have forum and other chatting tools inside that's why i canceled my membership after 2 monthes... like to discuss my minds with other members.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill.
-Part of an interesting network of 8 sites, many have unusual clothing fetish videos.
-No DRM or download restrictions. No download problems or broken links.
-Supports download managers.
-37 about a half hour top quality MPEG videos. My computer gives me no details and neither does the site.
-Fairly good camera work.
-Not the usual pornstars. Very attractive, actress, but not pornactress, types. Not the girl next door and don't appear to be amateurs either. Girls are from Spain or Portugal.
-Exclusive material shot for the site.
-Unusual clothing niche.
Cons:
-Only four video options, hi or low MPEG, ipod or flash. No downloading in parts.
-Not enough videos. As part of a network, it is a nice add on, but not much on its own.
-Only one photo set. Screenshots that are not zipdownloadable.
Bottom Line:
This is an interesting and different clothing fetish site, focusing on miniskirts. There are a lot of upskirt shots of panties, most of the girls have nice legs, and the skirts stay on during sex. The videos mostly start with outdoor public shots of the girls walking down the street as they are wearing tiny microminiskirts. Some are denim, all very, very short. A good maybe five minutes or so of interesting tease before the action. The only real negative here is that the sex is just ok; not much different from what you would see on any other website. You will find, oral, anal and vaginal, with mostly oral cumshots. All in all, an interesting, unusual angle on a clothing fetish with sex.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Inexpensive three day full access trial not listed on TBP.
-Bill through CCBill.
-No DRM, download limits, no broken links, etc.
-692 videos of about a few seconds to about three minutes. Most two to three minutes.
-Avi 1280x720 or WMV 520x400, 1478 kbps. Good but not outstanding.
-Can use download managers.
-64,981 photos, 684x1022. Can be zipdownloaded.
-Multiple updates daily.
Cons:
-Many shots are outdoors, so the lighting is sometimes a problem. Often shot from so far away that the videos are not clear and this is not helped by the shaky camera work.
-In spite of decent quality videos, sometimes the movies are still grainy. I am sure this is due to some of the videos being sent in by amateurs.
-Very poor use of English on the site.
Bottom Line:
The site is split into several categories:upskirt, tight jeans, lingerie, sexy shorts, celebs, panties/bikini, downblouse/upblouse, cameltoe, tennis upskirt,and nudism. Very softcore, as none of the photos or videos have any sex or even masturbation. There are photos for each heading, but most videos are listed under the category upskirt. Many of the photos and videos are nonnude, but interesting, and many I recognize as not being exclusive. Many video clips are from the DVD series Dreamgirls for example. The celebrity photos can easily be found on Yahoo or Google. The photo sets can be quite good, although they might only be of seeing a girls panties up her skirt. The videos feature a lot of girls flashing while not wearing panties. I found the videos to be of decent quality and worth watching if you are fussy about which ones you bother with. The best ones are obviously filmed by professionals and the girls know what they are doing. Not hidden camera as the girls try to be provocative. However, nearly 700 videos is a lot and not all are worthwhile. All in all, a lot of enjoyable, entertaining photos and videos, but a lot that is of lesser quality.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of content, pics and video-wise
- Sharp, polished pictures, good-sized.
- Vids are above-average quality, new ones are top-notch.
- Navigation is a breeze, except for the tiny type.
- Very classy site.
- Models are good-looking to absolutely stunning.
- Almost fasitious fidelity to the niche.
Cons:
- Need more variety in photo-sets
- Super-sized photos are too few and far between, and you'll have to guess which ones they are.
- Zero nudity. This can be a pro, depending on your frame of mind.
- No model directory, no search functions.
Bottom Line:
This is one of the classiest tease/lingerie/glamour sites going. "Village Ladies" this IS NOT, as most of the models are stunners. There are a few models here which had me shaking my head and picking my slack-jaw up from the desk.
The pics range from mild teaser shots to the girl spread-eagled with panties on but nonetheless proving without a shadow of a doubt that she's female. Lovers of stockings, panties, high heels, satin and lace, will love it here. Hardcore fans, or people who like to see women degraded, will HATE it.
As far as atmosphere, this is the exact opposite of anything "street" oriented. Getting a teasing glimpse of some of these women is about as much as a guy like me deserves. Open a bottle of Apricot brandy, light up a Dunhill, and enjoy yourself.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
