Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A once network combined into one large site with BDSM, bondage, all that stuff the mainstream sites avoid.
- I do believe some of this is authentic and for me, that just means it’s not going to guarantee porn or sex. The fetish is more important.
- It’s a big site once the network was combined. It has 799 scenes as of 3/6/22. It is updating weekly.
- The newer videos have 4K.
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max.
- Some of the women are very pretty for this niche. See that con.
Cons:
- Some of these women are not attractive at all to me. That’s why I think it’s authentic. These are women that are known to be into the fetish or niche.
- I have trouble with porn that doesn’t have sex or masturbation in it, unless it’s photographs and teasing. If you’re not into some of the fetishes, you won’t like the scenes.
Bottom Line:
I have been a regular member of BDSM sites and bondage sites. I like most of it. I don’t like anything that makes me think the person was hurt. I don’t care what they consented to. That’s my opinion. That is what you have to accept when you are on a site like this one. There’s a really good chance you’re not going to like maybe 30-40% of the content. You may not even understand it.
This does come with Adult Prime which I have been a member of since around the launch. I just hadn’t paid a lot of attention to this site. I remember it as a network of BDSM and bondage sites. That works better to me. There are scenes here that I have no idea what they’re doing. They have a woman tied up in bondage and are shooting a slingshot at her. Where is the sexual part of that? Yeah, she’s naked but she has welts all over her.
This site is not bad at all. It just has the stray scene here and there that makes me want to stray. It intrigues me enough that I wish they explained in text or gave a story about what’s going on. The good scenes, for me, are the ones that have a sexy, dominant woman spanking a smaller woman. Holding a magic wand between her legs. Her arms are tied over her head. She’s in writhing orgasm. Her feet are swinging off the ground. Most of the scenes on this site are more like that. They have some machine fucking. I haven’t ever gone against this; I have a lot easier time with two women together in BDSM and bondage porn. Their scenes with two or more women are very good. I don’t like the candle wax scenes. I don’t get that.
You will still run into the scenes that are not sexual. Maybe they are for the person, the dom and the sub, I don’t believe that translates in video. It’s like when I watch a video on youtube and wonder why I watched it. That is the part of BDSM and bondage porn that I don’t really like. Just because you get off on it doesn’t mean I’m going to. I’m not your sub.
The technical quality is very good. They have the regular options, 720, 1080 and 4K on the newer ones. They do have pictures but they’re not high quality photosets. I have said that before about Adult Prime. I believe they could improve their photos a lot. Even reviewing this as the fully combined network it still feels small. I don’t need to click most scenes. I can look at the preview and see it’s not for me. The ones that get me to click are the ones that make me think, “What the hell are they doing?” It’s like youtube. I would even say the sites and network Submissed would do better in the old format. There’s too much mixed up together. This is a scan over the newest scenes. I see a cute, petite woman being masturbated by a tall dom woman in leather pants. That’s a click. I see a guy in an army looking jacket with a hat pulled over his eyes leading a woman in tied up rope to lay down on a mattress in an alley. Probably not a click. I see a pretty blonde going wild and there is a machine at the bottom of her bed. I’m going to click that one. I see a small guy protecting his nuts and a tall woman kicking him in the nuts. Not clicking that. That is the point I’m making it’s a 50/50 chance I’m even interested enough to click it. That one with the nut shot looks even worse. The woman looks attractive, but I noticed she has a strap-on attached to her and she’s making the guy lick her shoes after she kicked him in the nuts. The guy looks like he hasn’t had anything to eat in a year. There’s the bonus to BDSM and bondage porn. I’m going to have to click it. He better wear her out. Okay, that was a mistake. She’s not that attractive and she just punishes the guy for 20 minutes straight. She does peg him and remind me that this network was better when they separated their sites into niches and series. Similar to how Kink does. It’s a different part of Adult Prime which is still, to me, a very good deal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of my first times trying Kink out. This is one of the better sites for my taste in porn.
High-powered machines with dildos on them being used on women in various ways.
The scenes are long, I would even say that is part of the “pain”. Most are 40-60 minutes.
The remastered versions of their older videos have 1080p downloads.
Lots of squirting, writhing orgasms, messy orgasms, this is a site that I believe we can be assured is showing real orgasms.
All scenes are downloadable, but the highest download option on most is 720p
Cons:
No longer updates, but it is all new to me.
The noise of the machines, the women screaming, moaning, sadly, to me takes away some of the eroticism.
Would be hard to justify as a purchase by itself. The scenes, even though I like them, are very similar.
Bottom Line:
I joined Kink two other times in the past, but did not look into all the sites and even once, joined Kink Men, without realizing it gave me full access to the whole network. Nearly everything on the network is harder than I like or prefer, but I like to try different things.
There’s no story or plot or any secret about these scenes. A woman is going to lay down on a table, possibly strapped (bondage) to the table or against a wall, there are multiple variations as to how they position the women. Some have ball gags in their mouth which I believe helps with the noise level. I feel bad for saying that, but some of the scenes are unwatchable based on all the noise mixed with the women’s screams.
The last update was on August 20, 2020 and it was a remastered Sasha Grey scene. I have noticed most of the sites on Kink have a lot of recent remasters. The only difference I see in those is they have a 1080p download option. With the length of these videos they are large files even in 720p.
I think what I liked most about it and it’s why my score is positive is that the models are often mainstream porn models. This seems like a niche made for amateurs, but the mainstream models, many of which are sexy, show a side of these models that you don’t see in their mainstream scenes. I’m not sure if that is a good thing -- for the porn industry as a whole, there are some known “innocent and sweet” models on here showing they are wild and experienced, but that’s what happens when a woman watches too much porn. I start noticing things that are not that important to the point of the scene.
I believe the other strong point is you’re seeing real orgasms on this site. There’s not a way to fake an 8 inch dildo hammering inside the woman for 40 minutes. There is squirting, puddling, sticky messes and the women do talk about the experience. They all seem very pleased and satisfied!
The rest of the site is basic, but that’s not a detraction. The scenes are laid out 20 to a page, the download options on the majority of scenes are 720p, 540p, 360p, 288p and 270p. There are pictures, but it seems like to me this is the one site where pictures are not useful. There’s too much movement.
I would recommend it to anyone like me who is interested in something different and tries Kink out. I believe this is the least hardcore or possibly “offensive” of their sites. They do excellent work with the cameras and in making the models at least seem comfortable.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Eight, kinky, bondage, dominance, submissive and sadomasochism sites rolled into one network.
The newest site, Pegging 4K, got my attention and made me join.
Newer scenes have 4K
807 scenes with 2 new updates per week.
Scenes have improved a lot since their older content especially in length.
I think this is the highest video quality you will find in this genre.
Cons:
The oldest scenes are almost all from the site Struggling Babes and most of those are 5 minutes or less.
Most of the scenes with bondage involved start after the submissive one is in the bondage.
Bottom Line:
Kink is my favorite network or site and this Submissed one can be looked at as a good alternative especially if you are into higher resolution videos. While Kink only has their scenes available in up to 720p resolution, Submissed has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on their newer scenes. The oldest scenes on Submissed still have 720p, so they have a lot of content that is equal to Kink in terms of video quality.
Pegging 4K talked me into joining. I had a membership here a few years ago. There are only 10 scenes on Pegging 4K currently, but the rest of the network makes up for it. I don’t think the Pegging 4K is quite up to par with Divine Bitches, where you at least get to see the pegged guy get to have sex with the female after he’s pegged, but maybe they will start working that into the scenes.
The sites included are: Pegging 4K, Struggling Babes, Ball Gagger, Bound Men Wanked, Femdum, Hogtied Up, Machine Dom and Sub Amateur. The network updates regularly with 2 updates per week, but all of the sites are not updating. I originally joined it a few years ago for the Bound Men Wanked content which Kink has a few licensed scenes from. I find it to be one of the most erotic handjob/female dominance sites I have been a member of, however, it is not one of the sites that is still updating.
There are 807 scenes, these each come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
I do believe this site is more accessible to the average porn user than Kink is. There’s not much English so you don’t hear as much degradation, most of the sites even with very hardcore premises are tamer than expected and the women almost always give in when in the dom role. That is what separates accessible from inaccessible in my opinion. Even with the backdrop of BDSM, the man gets off and the woman usually does too.
It’s worth a join if you’re into BDSM. The scenes could be longer, but they have been improving that. You also get the higher resolution videos compared to Kink. The navigation has a menu box you can select any of the sites in the network from and go directly to them. It’s a very good network that could use some improvement in the production and storylines.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Billing through Rocketpay
- Access to 34 sites in the Kink.com family plus partner "channels" where you get a taste of other sites content.
- Approx 540 videos as of January 18, 2020
- Amazing talent. Some of my favorites are: the legiondary Sasha Grey, Bobbi Starr, Harmony, Trinity Post, DANA DEARMOND, KATIE KOX, KRISSY LYNN, Asa Akira. Great Lily LeBeau as a dom!
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- scene are typically between 30-45 minutes
- scenes can be hearted for finding your favorites or remembering what you've already seen.
- Exclusive, as far as I can tell
- Good plot setups: Everything from slutty land lady to punished teacher, revenge fucking, etc,
- pre & post scene interviews
- Usually a girl/girl power dynamic. I found this more erotic than I tho
Cons:
Pros Cont:
- Fair number of exhibitionism shoots, a bit of a kink.com specialty.
- One of the few places to find fisting (vaginal and anal)
- Good organization: There's a star system (although I haven't figured out how to sort by rating). There's a very extensive tagging system, and a search bar that worked well in my testing.
- Trailers so you can see what's good before downloading
- Each scene has a description and member comments - with so much content this really help find the things your more into
- Models can be favoited with emails when she does a new shoot
Cons
- NO LONGER UPDATING: last update January 2016
- Ads behind the pay wall (seems typical for most non-ameature sites these days 😞)
- No 4K videos yet. I'm fine with this since I haven't upgraded to a 4K monitor but I see it's where the industry is headed.
- Download file names are non-discript. This makes it harder to keep things organized
- A little pricy.
Bottom Line:
Kink.com is one of the best in the business and this site is a solid good site. This site has a good niche, the tortured orgasm is rather rare and and in the fem/fem dynamic and this might be the only site of it's kind.
While I'm sad they stopped updating to be honest I was starting to feel like the shoots were repetative. While the talent is top notch there just wasn't as much variety as I would have hoped.
The production is top notch: from the quality, to the sound, to the lighting and directing - kink is one of the best networks out there - and with 20+ years of practice it's no wonder they've gottten good.
So what keeps this site from the 90s, the lack of updates for the last few years hurts and so does the high price (although you get a lot of value for your dollar).
If you're into this niche this might be the only spot to find it. And once your into the kink.com network you'll find a lot of BDSM stuff to enjoy. If you've never had a kink.com membership you should check them out. They are top shelf for sure.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Billing through Rocketpay
- Access to 34 sites in the Kink.com family plus partner "channels" where you get a taste of other sites content.
- STILL UPDATING (2-3/month is typical)
- Approx 950 videos as of December 30, 2019
- Amazing talent. Some of my favorites are LAUREN PHILIPS (I think I join every site she performs on 😂) Lily LeBau, Ivy LeBelle, Riley Nixon (kink is one of the only places I see her still performing)
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- In general, older shoots have more plot newer stuff tends to do a little get to know you and then straight to action
- scene are typically between 30-45 minutes
- Most orgasams seem real
- scenes can be hearted for finding your favorites or remembering what you've already seen.
- Exclusive, as far as I can tell
- pre & post scene interviews
Cons:
PRO CONT:
- Good organization: There's a star system (although I haven't figured out how to soert by rating). There's a very extensive tagging system, and a search bar that worked well in my testing.
- good model diversity (much better than most of porn). For this site mostly in terms of age. I'm a fan of MILFs and there's no shortage here
- Trailers so you can see what's good before downloading
- Each scene has a description and member comments - with so much content this really help find the things your more into
- Models can be favoited with emails when she does a new shot
CONS:
- Ads behind the pay wall (seems typical for most non-ameature sites these days 😞)
- No 4K videos yet. I'm fine with this since I haven't upgraded to a 4K monitor but I see it's where the industry is headed.
Bottom Line:
CONS:
- Download file names are non-discript. This makes it harder to keep things organized
- Very hardcore domineering.
- Little to no set up/plot. I like an expiration with my porn
- Too much pain looks
I used to really love a lot of this action. Woman conquering fear and mixing the adrenaline of BDSM and the heat of orgasms. Maybe I'm just getting older and my taste are changing. But I don't find this as interesting as I used to. I don't think it's anything on Kinks part they still do awesome work.
I really like the way kink is professional. They describe safe BDSM practice including safewords and signals. They have some of the best talent and are a leader in production. I really don't have anything bad to say in my bottom line. With over 900 videos in this niche alone there's enough her to satify your "kink" device play.
All and all I give this a solid "buy" even if I find it's no longer scatching my itch like it used to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Billing through Rocketpay
- Access to 34 sites in the Kink.com family plus partner "channels" where you get a taste of other sites content.
- STILL UPDATING (2/month is typical)
- Approx 1,200 scenes as of December 22, 2019
- Amazing talent. Kink brings in top stars and up and comers. Some of my favorites were MILFs like Lauren Philips, Cherie DeVille, Dana Dearmond as well as Jillian Janson, Candiace Lux (doing a suspension shoot), Whitney Wright, really too many to list
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- In general, older shoots have more plot newer stuff tends to do a little get to know you and then straight to action
- scene are typically between 30-45 minutes
- A lot of squirters
- Orgasams seem real
- scenes can be hearted for finding your favorites or remembering what you've already seen.
- Exclusive (IMHO)
Cons:
PRO CONT:
- pre & post scene interviews
- Good organization: There's a star system (although I haven't figured out how to soert by rating). There's a very extensive tagging system, and a search bar that worked well in my testing.
- models giving good dirty talk (a huge plus for me)
- good model diversity (much better than most of porn). For this site mostly in terms of age. I'm a fan of MILFs and there's no shortage here
- Each scene has a description and member comments - with so much content this really help find the things your more into
CONS:
- No 4K videos yet. I'm fine with this since I haven't upgraded to a 4K monitor but I see it's where the industry is headed.
- Download file names are non-discript. This makes it harder to keep things organized
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price. (although you get a huge amount of content and deals can often be found if you look for them)
Bottom Line:
Con Continued:
- Less BDSM focus (fewer tied up shoots) than the rest of the network. This could just as easily been a Pro.
- I found the concept too repetitive. I love seeing a woman get off - but the same formula over and over again was tiring to me
I had a kink membership a long time ago and I came back because I found a deal that was just irrestiable. Part of the "problem" with the kink network is there's soooo much here. I'm still working my way thourgh the downloads I made years ago. (certainly a good problem to have)
I came back because I knew the work here was top notch - although I've found my taste have changed and I'm just not as into the BDSM like I used to be. That said there's plenty of other stuff that isn't as extreme that I'm really enjoying (like fuckingmachines.com 😃)
For the bottom line I'd say: I'm disappointed they didn't have more updates in the time I've been gone. That said there's so much great here that if this kink appeals to you at all you'll find a winner in this site. They do pretty much everything right.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Epoch is not reliable but VirtualXS is better biller
-7 BDSM sites
-The network has over 740 scenes
-Many Eastern European models that are eye candy and perform very well.
-Comes with the ability to create your own clips and playlists
- Comes with a portal site https://www.secretfriends.com/portal/videos over 14, 000 streaming only samples of videos from other sites
-Comes with cam girls section with 8000 models called Club Seventeen Live
-Hands on customer service from the webmaster
-Tag system for searching
Cons:
-Prechecked cross sale on sign up page
-Slow and irregular update schedule. About two or three new scenes a month
-Poor use of scene descriptions
-No trailers in members area.
Bottom Line:
The Submissed network of seven BDSM sites has in total over 740 updates, including bonuses. Within the network nearly every video is available in HD, as well as a photo set for every video.
The sites are:
MachineDom. Mechanized dildo machine fucked women. 43 updates, may not be updating.
BallGagger. Ball gagged dominated women over 98 updates with no schedule, irregular.
HogTiedUp. Women tied up and immobile. Almost an archive site 29 updates, only 1 for 2019.
Subamateur. Submissive dominated amateur women. Archive site and not updating. Has 8 videos.
Boundmenwanked. Femdom handjobs. In all honesty I am not a fan of femdom or male humiliation, so this was a complete surprise. I loved it as the female dom used her man as a sex object and got great pleasure from the handjobs. I think this is a hidden gem of a site and would have joined for this one alone if I had known I would have liked it so much. Over 38 updates, barely a few in 2019.
Femdum where women dominate men with strap on punishment and cock milking. Archive and not updating. 17 updates.
Struggling Babes has over 427 scenes and updates two or three times a month. Recent videos have just a little lesbian or male/ female sex, or in some scenes none at all. Women are powerless and bound and you see light use of floggers, paddles, toys, and Magic Wands. Although I did not recognize many of the models, I saw Antonia Sainz, Ashley Ocean, Cindy Dollar, Delirious Hunter, Eveline Dellai, and British ebony model the beautiful Kayla. I did not know any of these did BDSM scenes. This is the anchor of the network and the reason most members join for.
If you are looking for wild and crazy BDSM scenes with lots of sex, this is not for you. Also true is that if you are a hardcore BDSM fanatic, this is not for you either. The BDSM is not terribly forceful and the subs never get welts. I don’t think it is much more than light pain that never leaves a mark. This is soft by BDSM standards and will not make you uncomfortable or squeamish if you are not a hardcore BDSM fan.
Some of the extras are truly fantastic quality and quantity both. For example you get content from 556 DVDs, a Secret Spinners game, a cam girls site called Club Seventeen Live with 8000 models, a portal site https://www.secretfriends.com/portal/videos with over 14, 000 streaming only samples of videos from other sites, as well as a feature I have only seen on International Media sites.
You can create your own clips and playlists. Often there is a certain part of a video that you like best. Whatever part you prefer, you can select it from the video and save it. This way you can enjoy your favorite parts whenever you want or loop them to play over and over. A single clip can be up to 5 minutes which should be more than enough to get the good parts.
One huge plus is the webmaster is very hands on with customer service, and is helpful even on the weekend. He has told me no problem goes unresolved and is interested in suggestions for the network as well as new scenes or models.
The site navigation is easy to use and there is no advertising on the members pages.
The billers are Epoch as well as Virtual XS. These are very reliable and safe to use. I have used both many times in the past and never had any problems.
Unless you are into much harder BDSM, this network can be an interesting way to enjoy some content that is very different from mainstream porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates about every 2 weeks
- multiple download formats available
- About 900 videos in this site many more across the network
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of ethnicities and age. Not much in the way of body build diversity. That's probably because the intensity requires a fair amount of athleticism
- top talent. Many of my favorite stars have shot here. They pay a lot of attention to production value and talent getting "into the role"
- Post shoot interview where talent assures audience the experience was enjoyable
Cons:
- Nearly ever scene uses the same male dom. He's talented but mixing this up is also fun.
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. But you get what you pay for.
- No photo sets available. (The older content has zip files available. It then they stopped doing that. They've reported that they are bringing back photos - but it's unclear if all the back catalog will be filled in)
- Very hardcore domineering.
- Little to no set up/plot. I like an expiration with my porn (Call me old fashioned)
- Cross sells inside the member site.
Bottom Line:
Kink is top of the line in terms of quality and quantity. The also book top fetish talent and new comers. Of course all that comes with a price. While I wish it was cheaper I also wish coffee was still $0.50. This is the way of the world and you get what you pay for.
With such a deep catalog and great production it's hard to say no to kink. They have a reasonable review policy (5 videos per day if you create an account - which means giving them an email address).
Probably the best part of DB, and this is true across the kink network, the talent is well directed. It seems like each starlet is allowed to bring her personality to the performance so while each shoot follows a specific pattern you don't feel like you rewatching the same thing over and over again.
This site is certainly on the extreme side of the line so preview before you buy - least you find it's not what you're looking for. I like hardcore content and most of this was too much for me (although I did find some great scenes in the vast sea of nearly 1,000 videos).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Thanks to LPee23 for reporting that .zip pictures are coming back.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about every 2 weeks
- Over 1,000 videos on this site alone - many more across the network
- Typical video is approximately 1 hour
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- "Plot" plenty of different set ups from disciplining nuns to CIA interactions and plenty in between. A very healthy mix. This side won't bore you.
- Orgasms are real - lost of squirts too if you're looking for that
- Plenty of squirters
Cons:
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. I knock this network pretty hard for this. I'm really surprised that they have awesome video quality and poor navigation.
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- I found the concept too repetitive. I love seeing a woman get off - but the same formula over and over again was tiring to me
- Less BDSM focus (fewer tied up shoots) than the rest of the network. This could just as easily been a Pro.
Bottom Line:
Kink is a giant player in the industry and they never disappoint when it comes to quality. They also have a good preview policy. You can see a minute and a half to two minute clip; 5 per day. There's no need to guess. Look before you buy.
They are a little expensive but you get what you pay for. I liked this site and found plenty of my favorite stars. While the set up is repetitive. It's still a hot concept and I like it.
The models get off really hard in each shoot. Everything seems genuine to me and that's important for me. I suggest the site both for it's breath of models and it's strength as a hot concept.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about 1 a week
- over 500 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- Top talent. If you have a favorite fetish model she's probably worked for kink and most likely for Wired Pussy.
- Orgasms seem real to me 😃
Cons:
- Narrow focus. For me this niche was too tailored and didn't keep my interest.
Much of my complaints from Kink.com apply here:
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (Probably not a huge minus for this site, but if you were hoping for it within the network it's lacking)
- Last update was January of 2016 - the one before that was 2014.
Bottom Line:
Site focuses on girls being tortured with pleasure. There's a strong bend for restraints. I find the site enjoyable but too routine. I checked out my favorite models. But really wasn't impressed. All and all there just wasn't enough variety/plot (I know plot - go figure)
With it's lack of new content and high price I would search other places if this is the only content your into. If you want this as part of the wider Kink package then it's worth it. Kink is a little price - but you get what you pay for in variety quality and quantity. (although the more I explore the site I'm finding how much gay porn there is. Great if that's your thing, but it's not for me. So while there are 24 sites in the network 8 are gay and 3 are what they call she male).
I really wish they would add a voting system, like so many other sites do. It would be a lot easier for finding the greatest hits. The organization is keyword and chronology based. So if you don't know what you're looking for you have a very hard time browsing.
If you do join I recommend the shoots with Sarah Shevron, and anything with Lily LeBeau.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's like a porn scene mixed with a robotics convention mixed with a home improvement show.
- If you're skeptical of women models having orgasms in porn you should join this site. It gets messy.
- Very basic navigation as with most of the Kink sites. It works well, but they could definitely use a more in-depth search.
- Good download speeds, which are needed since some of the HD scenes get into the 1.5 GB range.
- Kind of surprising, but you'll find a lot of the top-tier models on this site.
- This is a hit or miss depending on the girl, but you actually get quite a bit of dirty talk from some of the models. Others fall into the "Oh shit, oh shit, oh shit" annoying talk.
- Kind of reminds me of some of the old Sybian sites. You see a model that seems to hold back in most of her scenes, then she gets on this site, gets a 8 inch dildo stuffed in her by a mechanical contraption and she goes wild. That's a major plus this site offers that very few do.
Cons:
- Kink sites rarely do much wrong and this one falls into that group of not doing much wrong.
- Kink sites can become very repetitive and once again, this site falls into that group.
- 720p is the highest video option available and I do think this is a Kink standard. I've been a member of three of their sites over the last month and none offered 1080p.
- The action can become too hectic at times on this site.
Bottom Line:
You'll never look at your personal drill the same. I discovered this site years and years ago. It was the only Kink site I would join since I thought most of their stuff was too hardcore for my taste.
I'll get those cons out of the way first.
Repetitiveness. It's to be expected with a site like this. I'll admit, I enjoyed this site quite a bit more back when I first reviewed here on PU way back in May 2008. And it's mostly because the scenes today aren't really any different than they were back then.
Too hectic. Dancing Bear. Party Hardcore. Those two sites are too hectic because there's too many people involved and too many switching cameras. This site is too hectic because the machines work so good. You've got machines pounding the woman at X amount of RPMs, she's screaming, stuff is squirting out, dildos are popping out and slamming into their thighs. Some of the girls, a very young Jynx Maze comes to mind, almost seem to have figured the machines out and move in harmony with them. Other girls on here are letting the machines control them.
But hey, it's better than those solo sites where the girl grinds her hips after 10 minutes of masturbation and claims she had an orgasm.
I do think this content is fairly unique even in 2016. There are models who get completely lost in what the machines are doing them. Those are some of the best scenes.
Technically, Kink will always be strong with 720p clear and smooth videos. They do offer smaller resolution too. Pictures are gone, which I also think is a new standard for Kink sites. The scenes start with the model dressed and talking about different things about themselves, their lives, this can last 7-8 minutes in some of the videos. Once that's done there's usually some kind of basic masturbation with a regular dildo or Wand, then the clothes come completely off and the machines are cranked up.
There's no way I could say this for sure as this is a very big site, but it seems like they would leave some of the models in clothes or even just hose, fishnets, during the scene to add a different feel, but I've not seen any that do. Which is where this number comes in:
Over 1,100 completely exclusive videos. Most of the videos are in the 20-30 minute range and I'm guessing that's just because the girls can't take anymore. You'll see a lot of genuine reactions, orgasms, squirting in these videos. You even get the fun of seeing some models blush, giggle and cover their faces when the scene is over and really just act completely different from what they act like in a normal boy/girl or solo scene. That's why you join this site. Much like other Kink sites there's that one thing most of their sites do and it's worth a join to see it.
I should mention that not every scene is solo. Some of the scenes have more than one girl which, in my opinion, only adds to the hectic style of these videos.
It's another departure from normal porn and it's recommended. I join several of their sites each year, once a year and I can say I've been disappointed with any of them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Top notch models. Many are well known porn stars. Some others are doing their very first porn scene here.
-HD 1280x720 quality videos for an incredible past eight years worth of updates.
- 1029 videos and a photo set for each one.
-Nice mix of ages and ethnicities.
-Excellent camerawork
-Easy cancellation through the website.
Cons:
-Photo sets are not zip downloadable.
-Photos dont capture the action well.
-Photos from the most recent update are only 1200x800
-No 4K quality video downloads
Bottom Line:
This is a website from Kink.com, which puts out some of the highest quality porn. The video quality, attractiveness of the female models and camerawork are consistently top notch.
This site is one that I have never joined before, although I have been a member of most of their other ones.
I was not sure if I would enjoy videos of solo action, as that really does not appeal to me. My major complaint about other solo action sites is that the models are acting and do masturbation by the numbers. This type of scene would be totally too fake for my taste.
In contrast, this site is real, and I mean VERY real and there is no acting. The models cannot fake what goes on here. Porn stars are generally very jaded from doing so many scenes and not much gets them off. This site does that and more and in spades. Even the most skeptical viewers will find the videos focus on genuinely getting the models off.
They end up drenched in perspiration from the intensity of the action and are literally shaking. Most times they have multiple orgasms. Believe it or not, one scene is advertised as having 57! It is true as I counted them. No acting even in that scene and definitely no attempt at faking it.
What exactly do you get here? The videos show a kind of machine similar to a power drill, but with various sized dildos mounted on them. Sometimes they use two or three of them at a time. One scene even has four. There are several different machines and various sizes of dildos, ranging from normal size to huge. There is mostly vaginal penetration, but some scenes are anal only and many are of double penetration. There is even a scene or two with penetration vaginally, anally and one going in and out of her mouth.
Often niche sites tend to be formulaic and that can be a turn off here too. However, there are scenes that involve light bondage and feature more than one model. A few scenes were shot in Japan and have a different feel to them. Most of the models are familiar porn stars, but some are newbies who have never done porn before. There is a nice mix of ethnicities and ages. The site does not get stale as much as you might think.
The site started in 2000 and updates every seven days, so there is plenty to see here. I counted a massive total of 1029 videos. The oldest are of lesser quality as you would have expected, but are still watchable. The photo sets are not zip downloadable and not very interesting, as they do not capture the action well. Oh well, no site is perfect.
I was pleasantly surprised that I really enjoyed the action here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Rare sub-niche within BDSM
- Large site
- Many download options
- Streaming available
- Mainstream and fetish models
- Effective site layout
- Allows download managers
Cons:
- May no longer be updating
- Search function ineffective
Bottom Line:
Kink.com sites have a lot in common, and thats a good thing. The pros are significant while the cons are more detail issues on the periphery. Overall, any Kink site is worth the membership fee if you like the niche.
If this is the first review youve read of a Kink site be aware that Kink is likely the leader in online BDSM material. A key element to their success is that they seem to treat the models well. Both before and after the scene there are interviews with the model that make it clear that there is full consent and a safe word is in use. This is not BDSM porn focused on the pleasure of the Dom(me) in inflicting torment, but clearly focused on the subs pleasure in receiving that torment.
The general niche with any Kink site is BDSM, and the specific niche here is the use of electricity as a means of torment. Various implements are used, both externally and insertables, that cause the subs to squirm. In a majority of scenes, the electrical implements are used while the model is in bondage or restraints.
The site is laid out like all other Kink sites. There are a number of shoots per page and an easy way to advance the pages. The number of scenes per page is user-selected depending on how much detail you want.
Its a good thing that there is a simple design because the search functions are pretty dismal. It may have been the way I was using the functions, but I couldnt find anything I was looking for. And I found that the model search didnt work either. I was given a list of all the shoots a model may have, but I couldnt access it that way.
The site began back in 2002 and updated regularly until recently, so there is lots of material here. There are currently 537 videos available on the site. Kink appears to have been an early adopter of high quality videos because the vast majority of the scenes here are available at 1280x720. The highest resolution on the oldest files is only 640x480 but Im not going to criticize that since it was good back then.
Like other Kink sites, there are options for downloading the scenes. Streaming comes in four sizes and downloads come in WMV and MP4 formats. Within those choices are different resolutions. I downloaded the highest resolution MP4s offered and those came in at 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. They look great on a 24 monitor and look fine on a 50 TV too. Some may criticize the lack of 1920x1080 but I find that the increased file size isnt warranted by the increase in quality unless youre using a huge TV. The site permits download managers.
A highly subjective negative for me on this site is that it uses Dommes rather than Doms. Kink.com appears to be an affiliation of sites by different directors who work under the Kink roof. In this case, the site appears to be run by a popular director and sometime model, Princess Donna. Since its her site, she calls the shots and shes the Domme. A corollary to that is that there is almost no b/g sex here so dont come looking it. There are some scenes that have it, but there are likely less than a dozen.
Perhaps the biggest negative for the site is that it no longer appears to be updating. After regular updates for 11 years, the last update available is now eight months ago. Thats not to say that its dead, but for now it may be safest to consider that there wont be new scenes. There is often debate about this, but the fact that the site is no longer updating is only a minor issue for me if Im joining for the first time. With 537 scenes available at an average of about 45 minutes each I think this is an excellent value for the first-time member. Obviously this equation is quite different for a repeat member.
One difference here that I like, and I hope Kink maintains, is that they are honest about the lack of updates. The scenes are dated so anyone can see that there may be no more scenes added. But I hope that a prospective member would also consider 537 top-quality scenes to be great value. This contrasts with another Kink site, Water Bondage, where they have removed the dates and a prospective member could be misled into thinking the site was still active. Wired Pussy is a great site that doesnt need to hide the fact that it may be dormant since it is a good value anyway.
Like other Kink sites, this one got better as it progressed. The newer scenes have some creative bondage and implements, and while many of the older shoots had only fetish models, there is a steady stream of A-list porn stars lining up for some electrical play in the newer shoots.
The bottom line is that this is a Kink site and that means that all the good reasons to join are here: high quality scenes, top models, great production values, innovation and uniqueness, and an intuitive website with easy downloads. The fact that it may have stopped growing shouldnt deter a new member because at the membership price this is still a great value and highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 650+ videos
- Many big name stars appear
- Updates approximately every four days with the addition of a new scene
- Good variation in age, body type, tattoos/ no tattoos
- Variety of ways to download and view the videos
- Streaming is available
- Mp4 in two resolutions
- WMV in two resolutions
- Photos are available usually broken down into sets with set zips being offered
- Supports download managers with no obvious time-outs
Cons:
- Probably a bit extreme for many
- Some may not like the price
Bottom Line:
Full disclosure: I think Kink.com is likely the best online porn company in existence, but Ill do my best to stay objective
Obviously with any website if you dont have an interest in the material being offered then youre likely not going to like it. That is especially true for a site like this where the material offered is definitely not mainstream porn. If you dont like extreme BDSM then you definitely wont like this site, but I trust that you can still appreciate the effort that Kink puts into the scenes.
Device bondage is just that: the scenes all involve a female submissive being put into bondage by using various devices rather than more traditional ropes. Kink has amassed quite an impressive collection of implements to immobilize the models. Once immobilized the model is subjected to some further torment and in most cases there are forced orgasms. Actual sex does occur, but not in every shoot. Many of the Doms are females.
This may or may not be new since I last looked at this site, but I find that there are more big-name porn stars here. Amber Rayne appears to have shot a bunch of scenes in the past while and there are other stars that I wouldnt expect to see on an extreme BDSM site. Examples of this are Marie McCray, Sensi Pearl and Kaylee Hilton.
The scenes tend to follow a set formula: the scene begins with an interview where the viewers can see that this is 100% consensual. Then the scene is broken down into three segments so the girl isnt in one device for the entire scene. This adds a lot of variety and keeps the scenes from becoming dull. The interviews have been polarizing here at PU and Kink uses them on all their sites. I suspect that they do this more to appease the puritans and provide some measure of legal protection, but the frequent criticism of them is that including them at the first of the video can kill the sinister mood. I tend to agree with that and would prefer the interviews to be at the end or even as a separate file. But since theyre easily skipped it isnt that big a deal.
As of this writing there are more than 650 scenes and updates are posted approximately every four days with one scene being added each time.
This could be a good or a bad thing, depending on how you view it, but the models on the site dont all look alike. There is a good mix of stars and lesser-knowns, ages range from 18+ to over 40. There are models with lots of tattoos and models without tattoos. The site seems to want to appeal to as broad an audience as possible.
Another new element (which I may just have not noticed before) resolves one of the few complaints Ive had about this site. I wish that theyd include more behind-the-scenes material and show the model being put into the devices rather than just start with the model already restrained. The site has posted a few live shoots where the cameras are left rolling as the model is put into the devices and the production staff communicates with members watching the show live. There arent many of these live shoots, but it does give a glimpse into the inner workings of the site and I hope that the site continues to add them.
Being a Kink site, the technical bits are all up to or better than industry standards. Each scene has its own page and you can either stream or download the video. Downloads are available in either WMV or Mp4 format. Two resolutions are available for both formats. The highest resolution for both comes in at 1280x720. The bitrates are a bit different between the formats but both are approximately 7000kb/s. Both play at 30fps.
The site allows download managers and I didnt experience any of the links timing out. Download speeds are a bit faster than Im used to at other sites.
Perhaps the one thing that many prospective members might take issue with is the price. I agree that price is important, but price has to be taken in context too. I think that the price, when weighed against the value of the site, is very fair: this isnt cookie-cutter porn. This is all exclusive, with mostly top-name models, in a dungeon-like building and excellent production values. Kink has some of the highest production values of any porn company and this stuff cant be cheap to make. If price is an issue, be sure to sign up for emails from them because they occasionally offer membership deals. Also, once youre a member of one Kink site you get discounts on the other sites. An element to the value debate is that Kink isnt a network. Each specific site requires a separate membership. Given the high production values and exceptionally high quality of the scenes on all of the sites, I dont think this detracts from the value.
Device Bondage continues to do almost everything very well, and since I was last a member there have even been a few improvements. Even at full price the site is a great value if you like whats offered.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Video quality is outstanding
Large selection of videos and photos going back several years
Girls are very attractive, friendly, intelligent, and well adjusted.
Interview of the girls before using the machines allows viewer to get to know the each girl and how they feel about their experience. In virtually all cases, the girls are eager to get started and seem very happy afterwards.
Membership cost is very reasonable
Trial memberships with full access are available making this an even greater bargain.
Regular updates
Cons:
The format of a girl getting pleased by an electronic dildo can get boring after a while. There are over a dozen other sites on the Kink network that are more interesting.
Photo quality is not emphasized on this site.
No extra sites included in membership
Download files are extremely large. You will need a fast connection to avoid waiting.
Bottom Line:
If I had to name the top five networks on the internet right now, Kink would definitely be included on the list. It features an amazing assortment of high quality bondage sites, featuring top notch production quality, and gorgeous extremely positive and motivated amateurs. Fucking Machines is one the sites included in the Kink network. Unfortunately, when you subscribe to one you do not get access to the others. However, this should not deter you from joining the site. The quality here is unsurpassed by virtually any other porn site of any other kind on the net. The only downside to this particular site is that watching video after video of a girl getting plugged by an electronic machine can get boring after a while.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
HD Videos
Updates with HD 2x per week.
Pictures & Video Real Orgasms and Pleasure.
Very Original Content.
Fast Downloads.
Famous Stars.
Cons:
Navigation and Search could be better.
Wow 29.90 per month price a tad steep.
Watch for checked boxes at sign up.
Bottom Line:
Hey there:
Let me explain Fucking Machines, this site takes mechanical pleasure to a "hole" new level ( misspelling on purpose)They have machines that will suck, lick, rub, penetrate, tickle and is called " Fuck Machines for a reason. FuckingMachines, the woman getting "well"? fucked; holds the controls, so you always know that the hot girls is getting off for real. Anal, Vaginal,and any-other hole they can find.
Whether it's hardcore anal fucking, pussy fucking, deep probing G-spot fucking or explosive female ejaculation, the woman's pleasure is genuine. You'll know when she screams in pleasured orgasms she's cumming hard. I really found this exciting to watch. Great Show!
These girls are hot,I mean smoking hot. At first it seemed staged cause it is, but once they get going the phony acting goes away as you see sweat pouring down necks and thighs. Did I say they have smoking hot women ?
Toads Take:
This is a different site, I have never joined a site like this. But wow.
Before you join imagine something a actress would get penetrated by ? And its there.
LOL, even Alien Tentacles, ya it can get weird thats for sure.
The quality is amazing and the HD you can see beads of sweat and perky breast.
Be prepared this is hardcore at a new level, and pricy too. Is it worth the 29.90. Put it this way why it is pricey I would pay 40.00 to see this as it original and amazing real porn. Not the fake stuff we see sometimes.
The nice thing is its raw sex, and no guy talking
through it or getting in the way was huge reason for high rating I gave. I joined for three months and have two weeks left about.
Sorry for the long explanation of the site, but was a site you can not put into few words.
Specs:
400+ Videos
About 120,000 picture.
Many Videos have pics.
Updates 2x week in HD
4 Live shows every month
Amateur Girls & Professionals
Members Forum too ( maybe see ya there)
( note):
There are other links to pay for view so be aware they are an extra cost.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very unique niche
- Part of the Kink.com network
- Over 500 scenes
- Updates several times a week
- Multiple download options
- Pictures available (individual or zipped)
- Fast download speeds (1.4MB/sec on a single download)
- Interesting mix of amateurs, BDSM models and mainstream porn models
- Excellent value
Cons:
Can get a bit repetitive
Bottom Line:
I realize that Device Bondage might not be for everyone, but if you have a bondage interest this is an excellent site. The sites claim to fame is that they dont use traditional rope bondage, but, as the name suggests, they use a variety of other means to bind the models. The most common is a set of pipes and clamps that can be used in countless ways. It all makes for quite a unique site.
Most of the scenes follow an effective formula: first there is an interview (to make it abundantly clear that there is full consent this isnt Max Hardcore). Then they move to a bondage scene with some S+M thrown in. Usually a second bondage and S+M scene follows. At some point there will be forced orgasms. Finally, the scene closes with another interview. The basic formula is also followed where there are multiple models.
As of this review, there are now well over 500 scenes on the site. They continue to update several times a week. Adding the uniqueness and creativity on the site to the volume of material makes this site an excellent value.
On the tech side, this site meets the high standards of all other Kink.com sites. There are both HD and SD wmv files, an HD mp4 and a format for IPods. You can download the entire scene as one file in the listed formats, or you can download it in segments. Pictures are also available individually or as a zipped set.
My only two criticisms of this site are subjective. First, at its core, this is really a non-sex site. Mostly the only sex is forced orgasms on the models while in bondage. This is excellent stuff, but it isnt something that Im really into. Kink.com has sites, like Sex and Submission that are more to my liking. Second, Id really like to see the women being bound, either as part of the scene or part of a behind-the-scenes view. All the scenes start with an interview, and then move immediately to the model in bondage. Please Kink, add some BTS here!
Finally, the listed price may seem high, but consider the cost and effort that goes into the site when deciding to join. This site doesnt hire a male a female and stick them in a bedroom setting to fuck. There is a lot of creativity that goes into these scenes. It is definitely a good value at full price. Having said that, there are ways to avoid paying full price. Kink.com usually offers a discount on a second site and having memberships to two Kink.com sites isnt a bad thing. Also, register as a Kink.com member (free) and get on their mailing list. They regularly email special offers and deals on this and other Kink sites.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent niche site. It is unique, it is creative and it exceeds industry norms for the technical stuff. If you have an interest in BDSM, you owe it to yourself to have a look.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Kink.com network
- Huge, huge collection of videos (close to 500 now)
- Interesting fetish
- Done to typical Kink (very high) standards
- A good mix of recognizable stars and fresh faces
- Not degrading
- Good download speeds
- Various formats and quality available
- Pictures available
- Can download the whole video as one file now even older ones have been converted
- Updates weekly
- Very unique, very high production values
Cons:
- The only real con is that like other Kink.com sites this can get a bit repetitive since the featured fetish is so narrow
Bottom Line:
Wired Pussy is part of the Kink.com network and for anyone whos read my reviews of other sites from the network youll know that I consider Kink.com to be pretty much the best in the business.
The premise of WP is simple and fits well with the general BDSM themes in other Kink sites. In WP women are subjected to a mixture of pleasure and pain using electrical instruments. In most of the scenes the women are bound or restrained in some way which really plays to the BDSM theme. The scenes include a fairly lengthy interview with the model where she discusses her limits and clearly gives her consent to what has or is about to happen to her. The scenes vary in length and range from 20 minutes to almost an hour. During that time the submissive woman will be subjected to a wide variety of things from a TENS machine, Violet Wand, cattle prod and various electrified insertables for both the pussy and ass.
Like the other Kink sites, the directors make the whole BDSM thing work as a fantasy without degrading the models. At WP, as with all Kink sites that Ive seen, it is abundantly clear that the models are really into and enjoying whats happening to them.
The production values are high, as is always the case with Kink sites. The look and feel of the set adds to the tension.
The models are an interesting mix too. There are a lot of well-known porn stars who make an appearance. This includes some who are known for their BDSM work like Amber Rayne, Bobbi Star and Dana deArmond, and porn stars who arent normally seen in BDSM material like Aubrey Addams and Isabella Soprano. Many other models are unknown to me and may be true amateurs.
WP is logically laid out and easy to use. There is a good search function if youre looking for a specific model. Selecting a scene brings you to a separate page where you have a number of options. You can download pictures from each scene as a zip, or you can download the video in any of four formats. HD is available in both mp4 and wmv format for all of the newer scenes. The scenes can be downloaded as smaller clips or as a complete file. Kink clearly understands the value of making the product as user-friendly as possible. Download speeds are decent, being about average for the industry.
Are there things I dont like? Yes, but those are probably more personal preferences. The site is lesbian only which though I have no issue with girl-on-girl, I prefer BDSM to be m/f. Thats pretty minor, I know. The other thing that I dont like about the site is that like some other Kink sites the niche is so narrow that there is only so much that can be done differently. Many of the scenes all have the same look and feel. There are some scenes that are very different, such as an outdoor shoot in New York, or the mix of water and electricity.
The bottom line is simple: if this is an interest of yours, then I cant imagine youll find a site that does it better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ this is the original site for machines fucking gorgeous girls
+ lots of content going back until September 2000
+ forums for interaction between users and the team of kink.com
+ newest movies are good quality and a maximum of HD with 1280x720 pixel resolution. Videos come in several formats and sizes.
+ now 3 updates peer week
+ mostly sexy models that really seems to enjoy the machine fucking
+ amateur girl Fridays bring new and fresh faces into the world of fucking machines
+ videos normally start with an interview section and end with a conclusion about the girl's experience about the shoot
+ High download speeds
+ members get discounts on other kink.com sites (except The Upper Floor and Device Bondage)
Cons:
- older content isn't good enough for today's standard (but still unique and fun to watch)
- model bios could often need more details and sometimes you won't find all scenes when searching for a particular model
- would love to see full ZIPs for all fotos and a better resolution than the current 1200 pixels on the long side
- most of the machines are very noisy and it keeps me wonder how a girl can cum riding such a loud monster
- download managers won't work
Bottom Line:
If you can cope with the cons mentioned above the site really offers interesting content for those curious enough to see girls being fucked by machines. Ever since this site started they tried to improve quality of content.
I used to be a member some years ago but wasn't satisfied back then. The picture quality around 2005 was poor and the video quality also didn't give me a thrill. In any case this stuff only works as video content. The stills are nice but the actual action is missing what makes it not worth if you are only interested in picure series.
Sometimes it's hard for the girls to keep the machines under control. The dildos slip out and mostly it's only possible to get into action again by stopping the machines to insert the dildos again.
The best experiences came from the amateur Friday updates. The girls are mostly fresh faces that seem to 100% get of while being fucked with machinery. To see them being completly exhausted right after they've experienced this for the first time is worth the money alone.
By the way it's nice to see girls of different ethnicities being shot for fucking machines if only the wouldn't almost only concentrate on girls below 30 years of age. I'd like to see a MILF or maybe a GILF type of girl from time to time.
I experienced very high download speeds with all kink.com sites but unfortunately my download manager won't work. Because of the large size of the videos (up to more than one GB) a fast internet connection is needed.
If you are curious I would recommend to give this site a try. I'm sure you won't be dissappointed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A very good selection of models with many of them being amateur or semi-pro.
-You get a feel that the girls truly get off with the machines.
-Post 2004 videos can be downloaded has complete scenes(all othes are zip).
-They have over 550 videos to choose from.
-Members get a special 10$ discount on all their other sites.
-Upadtes come approximately once a week.
Cons:
-The machines are noisy, cumbersome and tend to drag your eyes toward them instead of toward the performer.
-The dildos have a tendency to come out and that often requires that the machine be stopped so that they can reinsert it.
-Photosets can't be downloaded as a whole. You have to download them by section. That's not a big loss because they aren't very good when it comes to showing the action.
Bottom Line:
-I've been aware of this site for many years and I knew that I'd have to join simply to satisfy my curiosity. I can't say that I'm entirely disapointed but I can't see myself rejoining them anytime soon.
Watching a girl have an orgasm or appear to have one (it's hard to doubt the orgasm at times) is quite nice. Specially after what I'm used to seeing in quite a few porns scenes these days.
Their biggest problem is that the site is called Fucking Machines and the machines are partialy the stars of each scene. They are rather weird looking contraptions that make a varying degree of noise. They tend to distract from the action.
The videos are for all intense and purposes solo masturbation scenes but with some very high end vibrator and dildos.
The one really great thing is that membership to one of their sites gives you that automatic 10$ reduction on any and all of their other sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Exclusive content with decent machine sex action.
+ Full movie download option or smaller clip downloads.
+ Fast download speeds (averaged 1 mbps)
+ Access to full network of sites including Brutal dildos.
Cons:
- Hasn't updated since January 11th 2009.
- Only 51 sets.
- Best movie resolution is 640 x 480.
- Most models are US models seen all over other sites.
- Mostly older content.
- Picture sets are just movie screen caps.
Bottom Line:
Chances are that if you join this site you will be spending more time with other sites in the network since there isn't that much to see here. What is there is decent, but that doesn't say much when there is only about 50 updates with no new updates in sight. Some points.
1. This site hasn't updated since early January and that is of major interest since there is only 51 sets as there is. If you are a major fan of machine sex it may be worth it but if you don't think you would enjoy the other sites in the network such as Brutal Dildos and Huge Strapon Lesbians you may want to think twice about it.
2. The fact that you get access to the other sites in the network such as Brutal and Huge Strapon is a big deal because Brutal is massive in and of itself. But as I said previously, if those big insertion type of sites don't appeal to you and you are only joining for the machine sex, it may not be an incentive to join.
3. Download speeds on this site seem to be much faster than other sites in the network for some reason. I was blazing through the downloads on this one.
4. If you tire of seeing the same models frequently like I do this site will be a major downer because most of these girls are all over the internet and regular porn movies. Would have been much nicer to see more original models.
5. You would think that approaching 2010 most sites would have a better movie resolution option than just 640 x 480, but that's all you get here. Well, you could downgrade to two smaller sizes but I don't know what the logic in that would be.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large site (220+ scenes) of a fairly unique niche
- Updates 3X per week
- Multiple download options for both videos and pictures (from HD to low res)
- Reasonable speed
- Many mainstream porn stars
- Very well executed
- Simple, straightforward layout
- Part of the Kink.com business, so quality and support are assured
- Not misogynistic or abusive
Cons:
- Gets a bit repetitive after a while
- Non-sex (but definitely not traditional 'softcore'
- Not much Behind-the-Scenes stuff
Bottom Line:
Device bondage is a site from Kink.com that meets their usual high standards. The genre is not one that Ive ever seen before but it fits well within the fairly extreme BDSM theme of the network. This is bondage using things other than ropes. Various metal pipes and bars are used, as well as handmade device machines. The women (almost exclusively young, fit and attractive with a surprising number of mainstream pornstars appearing) are bound in two or three positions during the scene. They are then tormented in some way, with clamps, floggers and clothespins being common. The women are not degraded in any way. All scenes contain an interview that makes it clear everything was consensual and the model was a willing participant.
It goes without saying, but this site isnt for everyone. If youre into mainstream videos or softcore, this site probably isnt for you. The site is technically softcore in that there is no sex (one test scene is all), but it definitely isnt soft. But it is part of the Kink network and Ive always counted on them for consistent quality and interesting, unique material. DB doesnt disappoint on that count.
While it is unique, it can also get a little repetitive. I suppose there are only so many ways to bind and torment a model. One thing that makes it repetitive is that we never see a model getting bound. We only see the end product. I think it would be interesting to include more footage of the actual process and to see the model get bound. There is also no scene set-up we start right out of the gate in a bondage situation.
The site layout might be considered plain, but I think it is simple and usable. It also follows the standard used at other Kink sites.
Im not a pic guy, but pics of the shoot are available in two resolutions. Zips are available too.
Videos are available in multiple formats so youre bound to find something that suits you, from mp4 HD to mp4 for ipods.
While Ive had no problems on this site, I did have an Kink.com account problem a while back that was of my own making. The support staff were just that supportive. The problem was fixed quickly and effectively the first time.
The final issue is price. The price is high for a porn site, and is the priciest of all the Kink sites, and the reason for that isnt obvious to me. Im not going to judge on price alone though. I prefer to judge on value. Do I feel I got good value? Yes. A little less than some other fetish sites, even those on the Kink network. But I certainly dont feel cheated either.
The bottom line is that only you can decide if you have an interest in this material. If you do, this site is large, technically well done, gives reasonable download speeds and gives decent value. If this niche is something you enjoy watching you can have confidence that this site delivers what it promises.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ high video quality (newer ones)
+ videos since 2008 often downloadable in one part
+ high dl speed 1200 KB/S
+ arround 500 videos
+ different video formats (streaming/wmv/real/ipod)
+ lot of pics
+ 2 regular updates per week
+ fency girls in crazy action
+ no softcore content
+ no drm
+ no dl limit
+ exclusive content
Cons:
- only two downloads at once
the cons for the elder videos then 2008:
- videos are split up in to 2 - 8 pieces
- zip download
Bottom Line:
in my opinion the best machinefucking site i know.
i like videos and fast downloads. that combined with funky sex machine positions with girls that really seems to like what the do is CRISPY...
you got well known actresses also as unknown women. from hairy to saved from dressed up in different styles up to totally undressed, different positions diffeerent machines.
you got mass videos in all kind of format. the hd quality is great but i takes some space at youre hd. the content is exclusive and with two updates a week, the price isn`t that much anymore then it was before.
all the cons of my last review were mainly solved. the dl speed is top, the videodownload in one part is up to date. it only hurts, that they changed in 2008 the oppertunity to download more then two videos simultan.
and however the elder the videos the lower the quality, but what shall i say to this?!
more updates would be great, but anyway, guys the work you have done is better, therfore i raised my rating with 5 points
Highly recommended
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-lot of contents
-regular updates (2 every week)
-good models
-great quality for recent updates
-real orgasms
-no download quota
-if you say that you want to leave, they give you 30% off
Cons:
-search tool is bad and unusable
-old materials has bad quality
Bottom Line:
This kind of fetish fit me really well. I would love to see my girl in there movies.
I would love to see some kind of written report made by the models with some comment about the machine. this should be great.
Other sites from kink.com seems very good and they should propose a rotating membership like "one month" in each site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-Part of a pretty big network of 9 sites. The network has more than 900 scenes.
-Three full video download choices by quality. The best quality is WMV, 640x480, as high as 12087kbps. Streaming is possible. You can also download clips.
-Supports download managers.
Cons:
-Irregular updates, only 2 so far this year
-No real age, size or ethnic variety. I saw 1 Latina, no Asians, Blacks etc. Only young White girls.
-Has only 51 updates, from ten minutes to a half hour each. Needs growth.
-As with any niche, it can get repetitious. The videos are extremely similar.
Bottom Line:
The girls here are mostly well known pornstars with a few faces I did not recognize. In each scene, there is a dildo attached to a machine that satisfies the girls. The videos vary in the reactions they get from the girls in that many have the girls just doing the scene and in others the girls seem to have genuine big orgasms. Since some are pros it may be difficult to really know exactly how much of an orgasm they are having. The dildos are about average size like what you would see on any masturbation site with none that are oversized or extreme. The machines don't move all that fast and furious, something like the speed you would see a girl doing it all manually. This is not an extreme site. I have not been a member of fuckingmachines.com, but the preview looks a LOT more extreme, as well as exciting. I don't think this site is the best of its kind by anyone's ranking. Overall this is only ok, somewhat recommended, but a bit too small and needs growth. As part of a network that has other dildo sites, it can work for you if you like the niche.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
