Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few attractive models.
2 models you've seen that are now pretty popular
Decent number of sets
Newer videos are full HD (1080)
Straightforward navigation
A few pretty good videos
(I'm really..um..stretching here to find Pros)
Cons:
No dates on sets
No indication of frequency of updates
Mediocre photography
Older sets have no video or really poor video
Several of the "Naked Gymnasts" aren't naked
Very basic navigation
Image downloads in one size (medium or small)
Many videos are SD
No model pages or search.
Site layout and design is ancient.
Bottom Line:
This was a clone site for Naked Gymnast, which apparently is gone, but this site is identical. My original review was for NG, but since that site is gone, all of the reviews are gone also. So...I'm writing an updated review here.
I saw a couple of very nice sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today. Even among sites in this niche, this site is sub-par and a little less than truthful in the way it presents material.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com. Many say naked-gymnast, which was a clone site.
The models are typically young, but there is an odd lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are neither gymnastic nor flexy and certainly not sexy, just strange. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...maybe it is gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam. Most girls start out dressed and in some sets the girl stays dressed. Oh, and for most models there is little to no eye contact with the camera. That is a significant factor in the clinical feel.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio. And unlike pretty much every other model on this site, these models know how to look sexy...and how to look at the camera.
Here's another gauge. I just looked to see what I saved from the 500+ sets on this site. 6 photo sets and 6 videos from 4 girls I considered attractive (two were the ones I mentioned above, more recently at Met Art.). The rest were totally forgettable.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it is a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but for $30 this site is not worth visiting by itself. There are better sites in this niche for your money.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-1080p and 720p mp4 vids looks great
-hot models, mostly amateurs
-a lot of vids & pics
-real pics, not just vidcaps
-vks billing for easy canceling
-fast downloads, manager supported
Cons:
-bad webpage design
-slow updates, tho understandable since its a niche site
Bottom Line:
like the other reviewer said, the website design is bad. it is hard to keep track of what you have already downloaded, i had to keep checking my folders. this is really the only negative of this site
the videos are amazing. almost all the models are amateurs, i only recognized maybe 3 faces. it is clear they have some sort of background in gymnastics/ballet/dancing. this is not just some girls opening their legs. most of the girls take the videos serious, proudly displaying their flexibility. there are a few girls who are cute & embarrassed and smile a bunch, which highlights how these are real amateurs.
also one of the better videos from a model i now know as Inessa Sabchak is here, simply amazing.
there is a discount to their other site underwatershow in the members area, which i have also reviewed. i highly recommend it as well.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-tons of videos
-1080p videos are great quality
-720p are great quality too
-hot amateur models
-fast downloads
-uses vksbill (easy to cancel)
Cons:
-gets repetitive
-horrible web page design (none)
-no pictures
Bottom Line:
this site delivers exactly what it says it does. mostly hot models swimming in the water. that is its downfall as well, as it is the same thing over and over.
usually starts with the model slightly clothed (dress or bikini) and jumping into the water. she swims around clothed for a bit, then strips. this includes treading water, diving and some swimming. most of the girls look comfortable underwater holding their breath and eyes open, so no goggles used. occasionally there are multiple girls at once but i find this distracting.
at the end she gets out of the water and walks away. i wish wed see more of them in the nude after being in the water, but this is very rare.
this website is literally a long list of videos with a thumbnail. there's over 200 videos all on one long page...also no description or interview with the models.
if youre looking for something different with unknown amateur models this fits the bill
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content updating for at least approximately 4 years or more (read cons to understand why I had to ballpark this). Scenes and shoots are mostly European models showcasing themselves doing gymnastics, posing, and dancing while demonstrating flexibility.
- Newest videos from present to mid 2014 are .MP4 at 1920x1080 at ~10,000 kbps. Then they go .AVI at 1280x720 at ~2,034 kbps for about a year (give or take). The oldest updates are .AVI at 712x400 at ~796 kbps.
- Newer photos are ~2000x1333 and available via zip downloads. Older photos are ~1200x800 with only some available via zip downloads. I cannot tell an exact date when these begin or end to be available via zip.
- Updates come once a week on Fridays with either a photo set or a video. IMHO, this is not bad considering it is a small niche site.
- Majority if not all models have real gymnast and/or flexibility. There is no models faking this here.
- All models will at least be topless or pantyless or completely nude.
Cons:
- Terrible website design. It seriously looks like it could be from the late 1990's or early 2000's. It's just a blue background with updates.
- Navigation is extremely underwhelming. There is a sidebar that showcases update date and what was updated. However, this stops at a random date with much more content offered and never knowing when that content was updated on. On the main page (not the sidebar), each update is non-dated but contains a picture still and name of the model. It does not even say if it is a photo set or a video.
- When viewing an update, there is no date and the page shows thumbnails of the photo set broken in to multiple pages. If there is a zip available, it is on the top of the 1st page only. At the bottom of the page, the video update link is present.
- Sometimes a update on the main page will be both a photo set and video update and sometimes it's either or. This really makes it hard to know if you are getting all the updates correctly.
Bottom Line:
Flexy Teens may be an extremely hard site to look at and to navigate. However, this is really the only terrible thing about this site. The actual content involved is everything one wants when deciding to venture in to this niche.
The content can range in how dirty the scene gets according to the model. All models are truly flexible and most can actually do extremely flexible gymnastics. Settings tend to be what looks like a studio with a solid or multi-colored back drape sometimes containing props. These props can be mirrors, bar stools, chairs, sofas, desks, and some other things. The lighting is extremely well done and everything looks professional enough. Outfits range from real gymnast style get-ups like tightly colored spandex to regular every day clothes. Earlier updates have some of the models wear a small mask covering the eyes but these are an extremely small percentage. The studio appears to be the same one used for most updates but real efforts are made to change the look of the studio for each update.
The actual videos really look good in clarity. There is a small non-intrusive watermark in the corner of each video. The newer 1920x1080 videos are really clear without any grain at all. I cannot find one thing to complain about the actual video quality of these videos. The 1280x720 videos are quite decent as well. I don't really have many complaints about the quality of these videos for the most part. The first dozen or so 1280x720 updates when they changed from the lower resolution videos are not as good as the others. However, what can one expect when the switch happens and the encoder is learning. The older videos are pretty terrible but that's expected.
The first video update of a model is usually the model doing gymnastic poses but moving on quickly to do another flexible pose. It's more of a dancing video showcasing flexibility with fluid motions. However, certain models will only go so far as to how much they undress during these scenes. It really all depends and I would say more than half get completely nude or show their pussies. I've never came across a model stay completely dressed. The camera tends to be more stagnant during these kind of scenes with minimal zooms. These scenes tend to be on the shorter side, ranging from 5 minutes to 15 minutes long. But, it makes sense for this content to stay shorter because there are only so many dancing poses a model can do.
The second update of a model tends to be a bit more slow. Meaning, the model tends to do flexible poses but staying in this pose long enough for multiple zooms and/or angles. However, not all updates follow this example. Many models just update themselves doing scenes like the first update multiple times. I would say about half of the updates follow two different styles of scene updates. When the model is doing a more slow paced multiple pose scene for the update, the amount of dirty can vary with the model. Some will show their pussies and preform extreme spreading while touching themselves. Many will not do this. I only came across a handful of scenes where a model uses a sexual toy or actually masturbates during these poses. The videos are usually around the same length as the first updates at 5 minutes to 15 minutes.
The photography involved with the updates are accompanying sets to the video scenes. Meaning, the setting, outfits, and poses are the same as each update. These are not stills of the video but actual photo sets. I found little to none airbrushing or additional alters to the photos. There is a non-intrusive watermark in a certain corner not obstructing anything. Pretty much all updates tend to showcase anywhere from 450 to 300 photos each set. It's a shame that not all updates are available to download via zip.
A small number of models return for more than 2 updates (2 video scenes and 2 photo sets). If a model does return for more, then the content varies from the one of two types of updates I described earlier.
Flexy Teens truly does tend to be on the lighter side when it comes to content. Many models will get completely nude and spread themselves allowing for close-ups ranging to the extreme but there are a large number of models who will not. Don't expect much masturbation with or without toys or hardcore to be in the majority here. Many models may fondle themselves a bit but a model never gets too intimate. However, this still does not mean a scene can't be intimate. The site gets mostly attractive models that are true to the niche and captures them doing what the site is offering. It does seem to be one of the premier sites offering genuine flexible gymnast woman with well toned bodies willing to get nude on some level for the public. It's truly a sight to see if anyone is interested in this type of content. However, it's not the content that drops the points but the poor web design and navigation to actually get the content. I would recommend the site for anyone venturing in to this niche
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Exclusive content
+Archives going back to 2001
+Many known and some lesser known Euro babes from Czech, Hungary, Russia, etc.
+Photos might look too “shopped” to some, but I think they look nice
+DownloadThemAll works with the photo galleries
+They no longer do their own billing. Now it’s through vsx bill.
+Site assigns you your usepass. Mine began with "Hym," which was mildly amusing.
Cons:
-High price of nearly $40 (converted from Euros)
-The “faux defloration” bullshit might not appeal
-Almost no zips for photos
-Photo sizes vary from 1200 to 2000 px. They often max at 1350, even recently.
-Watermarks on photos are too big. 2004 and earlier, they are absolutely ridiculous: 5 lines long! And they aren't samples; they're on EVERY pic!
-Doesn’t update that often
-Videos download rather slowly at an unsteady rate of 360-500 kpbs.
-No separate section of just videos for quick access
-Videos are all avi. Dimensions and quality varies (larger and better are more recent, of course). Avi is a big con to me because even though I have the most recent DIvX player with the most recent codec, it’s shitty software. (But some play nicely in Windows Media Player. Figure that!)
-Downloads have quit and had to be restarted (not often)
Bottom Line:
You might recognize a lot of these girls, but not necessarily by the names they have here. A sample: Amelie Loren (Angelica Black), Lulia Lesovitch (Peaches), Rita Hartman (Lauryn May), Anita Koromislo (Leanna Sweet), Natasha Pushkina (Suzy Black), and Vivien Piaf (Blue Angel).
Now, imagine that some of these girls lose their virginity at this site. That’s what you’re supposed to do. They speak in their own language with the stud, but there are English subtitles. “Do you know why you’re here?” “Yes, to lose my virginity.” I really like Blue Angel, but I doubt that it was a major life event for her. And for a girl about to lose her innocence, she gave a damn nice blowjob.
To assist you in your suspension of disbelief, the girls “bleed” when their “hymens” are “broken,” and they might ask the guy just what that creamy white stuff is that’s coming out of his cock. Yes, this guy, Tommy, is busy. He educates as he ejaculates.
Photo “evidence” of the hymen is also presented. Bigfoot, eat your heart out.
Not all of the girls are here for a cherry-poppin’ good time, though. Don’t expect Peaches to go seed-to-seed with Tommy. But I’m 98% sure that their “Nora Phillips” is also Rebecca C of MetArt, so that makes for a rare find. Video included. Pretty hot!
Now for some nitty-gritty. Posted updates are shown in both a left-side text column and a main thumbnail area. By year, the number of updates in the main area have been:
2001: 12
2002: 11
2003: 15
2004: 12
2005: 17 (final year of “one model per update”)
2006: 20
2007: 41
2008: 43
2009: 52
2010: 3 so far
These are photo updates. Some girls have solo and/or hardcore videos linked from the last pages of these. And some don’t.
Final word: For a site this expensive, it should obviously have 1. easily accessible videos in a video section, 2. photos at least 2000px as standard size, 3. zips of all photosets, and 4. videos in wmv as well as trouble-prone avi.
Even now, I think it rates about the same as what exotics suggested a year and a half ago.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Does what it says on the tin. Ballerinas and gymnasts pose doing their thing. Wide extensions etc and etc.
Good quality photography and videos - I mean here technical quality..it's clear and decent sized.
Cons:
Videos shot in front of stills photographer (with flash occasionally)
All chat in Russian? OK, but if you're not fluent...
All shaved
All (except one) softcore
Bottom Line:
If you want to see basically lissom, shaved athletes stretch and pose this site is for you - as long as you're not too fussy about seeking either liveliness of video or variation in stills
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive models and fine photography.
-leader and maybe truly the only one in its group.
-quality vidoes.
Cons:
-one update once a month at best. Way, way too little. You join and nothing happens.
-Photography is really good, but not enough by a long shot, and certainly very little as regards their theme.
-lay-out is okay. Easy enough to get around, but easily could be so much better. Feels like a nice idea, they don't really care that much about.
-only one video choice. So second rate it's not funny/
Bottom Line:
Defloration.tv (there's also defloration.com listed, but don't expect anything but one and the same) is a nice idea and a true niche, but dances on the razor's edge of worth it. If you join, do it for a month and then wait 2 years. This site is nothing more than a means of selling dvds. If the dvds are like the site; then, if you must, save you money and be a site member for one month and one month only. Pass on the rest. The other option is to not join at all, and you won't be missing much.
-a shame really, but there's so much better out there.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
