Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s my most consistent highly-rated site and it does not disappoint
Six updates per month and the last few months have included lesbian scenes
Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
Tags are accurate and the site is still one of the easest to use
4K downloadable videos if you pay the premium price, I pay $34.95 and get 720p and 1080p downloads
Downloadable picture zips only included if you pay at least for the $34.95 membership
The sexiest models in porn
Cons:
It’s not difficult for me but I imagine a new user would be frustrated with the membership tiers
Knowing if anything ever happens to my In The Crack external hard drive, I’ll have to pay at least $80 to download it all again.
Bottom Line:
It’s In The Crack, in this day of mega networks and cookie cutter porn content, In The Crack continues to just do what they do best. They have a simple equation, it goes like this get a top tier looking model, make her look pretty and even down to earth, then have her show how flexible and kinky she is. Sounds like my idea of a perfect date. In The Crack isn’t going to impress you with deep, psychological plots that revolve around the same half-dozen premises you’re used to. They’re going to impress you with gorgeous women doing the most kinky poses.
It says a lot for In The Crack when I say my favorite picture sets are from In The Crack. That’s probably the last thing they are known for, but their colors, settings and the way they dress and present the models is top-notch. I’m never disappointed with any of their picture sets.
I have also never been disappointed by their model selections. White, black, Latina, Asian, they’re all great. It’s also worth mentioning, over the last few months, In The Crack has added a few lesbian sets. Their lesbian sets are often considered the best in porn and I agree.
Here is the easy way to use In The Crack, look at the top of the page and click, “Collections”. That’s how I do it. The scenes are listed in descending order from the newest to oldest. I just go through and download every scene, every photoset and there’s no hesitation. The content is that good and it’s that consistent. I guess you could call it Simplified Porn.
Of course, while the content is simple to know what to download, joining isn’t as simple. I’ll help you out again, the $34.95 tier is the lowest priced option to receive downloadable zips for the photos. That’s the one I join. You also have downloadable videos and a monthly download limit of 300GB. You can go up to $39.95 tier and will receive the 4K downloads on top of everything included at $34.95 and the $39.95 tier includes a monthly download limit of 500GB. For those that want completely unlimited and access to 4K, too, there is the $69.95 tier. It has everything included and no monthly limit.
In The Crack makes some of the most explicit and kinky masturbation porn look classy. You don’t need a plot with their content. It’s all right there on the screen. The plot is all the things your mind is thinking about doing to the model. The models even move a little slower, smoother and are somehow 100% feminine, even with something up their butt. It’s sites like In The Crack that remind me of how much I enjoy porn but sadly, In The Crack also reminds me of how overproduced and glossy the mainstream is in porn.
I have tried finding faults. I have inspected the photos in their highest quality state but no faults. Oh, there is that one lesbian video from the early years of In The Crack’s life that has the sound muted. They even point it out before you download it. It’s as good of a site as I have ever joined.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No site has flirted with 100 more than In the Crack but I have still yet to give it a 100. I think the average for In the Crack from me has been around 96 for about 12 years.
- This review is based on the In The Crack Plus membership which is $34.95/mo. It has everything I want and “need” with a membership. Bottom Line will have details.
- One of the few sites that will leave you torn between wanting a hot model and a nice vacation.
- In my opinion, the best quality photos and videos available from any site.
- Though there are lesbian scenes here and there, the majority of the site is solo content and that’s why it doesn’t get a 100 from me. Solo is my favorite. I may be a little biased. It is the best solo site on the internet.
- Fast downloads (see bottom lin
Cons:
- The tiered pricing is sure to bother some people. I admit, the first time I joined with the tiered pricing, I received the membership that doesn’t include zip downloads for pictures and was quite annoyed.
- Let’s nitpick, the site itself still looks like it did in 2012 and maybe 2007. Does that bother me? Not at all.
Bottom Line:
I have talked about the greatest compliments I can pay a site, and In the Crack has several of those distinctions. I was first a member when they were still having audio problems. The videos, the close-ups, the ways the models are presented, have all been copycatted. But none can fool me into thinking I’m looking at an In the Crack photo or video set. Take a look at their scenes. Tell me a site that has those colors in their scenes, those backdrops, those angles, those shadows, those what are they called? Women? It’s the prettiest porn site in the history of internet porn. Don’t shy away. This is not some run of the mill artsy, glam site. With all the prettiness and perfect colors, one could assume the action is safe and glam. Then you see a model do a split across a bathtub and see how many bathroom objects she can shove in herself. No hole is sacred. No emotion is either. Happiness, sexiness, arrogance maybe, and writhing, pulsating orgasms.
In the Crack hasn’t made it this long without being good at something. Count the years, over 20, and they were always at the top of the industry in quality. It's that unique, it’s that high of quality. And the models put on their best performances. I have a whole list of models that had their best performance on In the Crack. I said it in a previous review. Once you join In the Crack, you may not ever join another site.
I don’t remember when the tiered pricing started but I will say it’s not like the tiers or add-on prices that other sites use. In the Crack played it ethically and to help the potential members. Before the tiered pricing, In the Crack, was $34.95/month. They don’t do promos or coupons. They don’t need to. Their content speaks for itself. The tiered pricing was a move to help potential members. I’m sure they knew that the $34.95 price was steep to the average porn site member. They came out with the basic membership. It’s like a trial and it’s $9.95 for a full month. You can stream any of the videos in SD. You can also view the “small” resolution pictures. Not many sites do that. They’re giving people a chance to experience their content without spending $35. The next step up is a logical one, it’s called Stream. It’s $19.95 and you can stream in SD and 720p. You also can view the large pictures. The next step up was the one that got me awhile back. It’s called Standard. It lets you view all sizes of pictures; stream all sizes AND you can download the 720p videos. That’s where they got me. I didn’t realize you can’t download the pictures. The standard is $24.95. There’s something else to add to this. Starting with Standard, there are download limits. Those are listed on their site. They’re very upfront about it.
For me, since my one mistake of joining Standard, I don’t even fool with looking at the tiers. I want downloads on pictures and videos. You have to jump up to the Plus membership. It’s $34.95 the same price their site was before the tiered pricing. The Plus gets me everything I want. It has 720p and 1080p downloads. The big pictures can be downloaded in zips and it is the membership that will give the non 4K fans, the best experience. They have two more steps up, the 4K and the Ultimate. The 4K explains what it adds and it’s $39.95. The difference between 4K membership and Ultimate is the download limit. I don’t find their limits to be a problem. The Plus equals out to 300 GB per month. I usually hit about 80-150 GB per month on it. I do think the only way the limits really matter is if you have to have 4K. In that case, it’s probably best to join the Ultimate. It’s unlimited and you get 4K. The cost of it may make you decide you don’t have to have 4K. It’s $69.95/mo. If you have a fast internet connection and want 4K, I would do the Ultimate. Set aside a month per year just for In the Crack. It’s what I do.
You will see models’ prettiest content and possibly dirtiest content on this site. You don’t like pictures? Try the pictures from In the Crack. The only thing that stops the 100 is I know the price combined with tiers is just not going to set well with some people. The content itself is an easy 100. I wouldn’t even suggest them to change their tiers or price. It’s something you have to try and see for yourself that if (enter site name) is worth $19.95/mo, In the Crack is worth $34.95 or more per month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Arguably the most consistent and at this point, possibly the best non-hardcore, solo with some lesbian scenes, site on the internet.
- Updating roughly twice per week.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- One of the better ranges of races in models. Just in the last month they've had Asian, black, Indian, Latina and white models.
- Premier models, you rarely if ever see an unattractive model on this site.
- I personally like the tiered pricing. I do the $34.95 option and am always satisfied with the content I get with it.
- Video quality is crystal clear even on 720p, photo sets are just as good. Videos go up to 4K, but you have to choose that tier to get those (costs more).
- Production values, settings, outfits, lighting, camerawork, the models performances are all top-notch.
- Navigation is excellent and very easy to use.
- Will have to explain this one in the bottom line, will call it a "hard drive of their own".
Cons:
- Some won't like the tiered memberships. I will try to explain them with examples of what you can get with them.
- Videos are in parts, this is something I've gotten used to and don't mind since there are some parts I wouldn't watch anyway.
Bottom Line:
In the Crack has consistently scored over 95 for me. I just don't know of a site that makes one great scene after another and it's something I've mentioned before, there are models here that I never paid much attention to on other sites. Their content here is much better. Ashley Fires is the best example.
The tiered pricing. The first thing to know is the first time I joined In the Crack, I want to say 2007 or 2008, it was $34.95. I don't remember if they had download limits back then or not. The $34.95 option is what I still join. It gives you all photos, view and download (small and large sizes), it gives you all video download options except 4K. The download limit with it is 10GB per hour, 30GB per day and 300GB per month.
Since the videos are split into parts, I'll use the newest Cindy Starfall, I download the 720p versions. All four parts that make up the full scene are a combined 1.1GB. That's for right at 40 minutes of video. If I went up to 1080p it would be around 2.3GB for those 4 parts.
If you're content with 720p, you can realistically download 250 or so models scenes in a month. Which goes back to the pro I call, "hard drive of their own". I have every In the Crack scene up to January 2019 that I want. I join once a year and can easily get the all of that year's scenes and stay under the download limit. I actually think I could do the 1080p versions and stay under it.
What it amounts to is if you have no In the Crack collection, you might as well take the plunge and join the unlimited for a month. It's $69.95 and you can download all you want including 4K. Their scenes date back to 2001. Once you're caught up, you can easily get by with the $34.95 membership once per year and get caught up.
The models here are not only some of the prettiest on any site they do more here, there's anal play from models that normally don't. There's very hard masturbation from models that normally don't. There are flexibility poses, sexy outfits, there's so little to complain about, I had to find two cons that other people might be bothered by.
I wouldn't call this a glam site since the actions within the site are not what you see on glam sites. But the models are typically made up very nicely and many of them look like they're about to go on a really nice date. The photo sets are a big part of my enjoyment. The Cindy Starfall photo set has around 80 pictures. Of the first 10 photos she's fully dressed, looking really cute and sexy, the next 15-20 have her sexually provocative poses with only her hose stopping you from seeing her fully nude ass and pussy, then the rest of the set she's removed the hose and eventually is fully nude and masturbating. That is a lost art in today's porn. There's posing, teasing, fully clothed, and everything that made pre-tube site "nude, nude, nude" hardcore porn, great.
They have 1,591 scenes, usually a minimum of 30-40 minutes of video in each of those and a photo set with each.
The one change that I have noticed is the scenes continue to go away from the gynecological style the site was known for in the earlier days. They still live up to their name of In the Crack with some extreme close-ups, including during masturbation but you spend more time looking at the outside of the model's orifices than than the inside of them. It's like taking a very artsy site with all the beauty those bring and deciding to suddenly make it a hardcore masturbation site.
Very few sites can pull this style off and I'm certain at this point that none have been doing it longer than In the Crack. On those tiered prices, something I always thought was a nice option for those that haven't been a member is the $9.95 option. You can view the small pictures and stream the SD versions of the videos. That's better than most sites trials and it's 30 days with no limitations on how much you stream. They also have a $24.95 option that lets you download up to the 720p versions, but you can't download the pictures. I do think the $44.95 tier is a problem. It adds 4K downloads but you still have a download limit and those files are huge. I think if you have to have 4K, you might as well join the unlimited plan. I'm completely fine and content with the 720p version and downloadable photo zips so the $34.95 one works fine for me.
They have over 1,000 models and the top models have more than one scene. I think Jynx Maze has 4 and I would rate those 4 scenes in her top 10 scenes of her entire career. Cindy Starfall is another, you could look over my reviews and see where I've mentioned her over the years. Her scenes here at In the Crack are the best of her career. They work some kind of magic there.
I'll end by saying this is one of 3 sites that I could see scoring 100. I haven't ever done that but while not perfect for everyone, they're very close to perfect for me. Highly recommended for those that love to see beautiful, naked women in their most spread open and bent over poses.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, in 2018, one of the top 3 porn sites on the internet.
- Tiered memberships let you pick your level of quality and what all you can download.
- A fair but limited "cheap" option of $9.95, will go over the options in BL.
- If you're on this site it's for the models. Few if any sites regularly, consistently come up with so many high level models.
- Picture sets here are some of the best you'll find, including the production qualities with settings, clothing, even the colors.
- Updates every 3 days, each update includes videos, pictures and streaming "mini-vids".
- Download speeds are very high for me (90% and up of my max).
- A big site considering it's mostly solo models.
- CCBill is the biller.
- I join once a year for 1-2 months and download the content that has been released since my last join. I download and keep every set.
Cons:
- The tiered membership options won't be a favorite of some. Be sure to read in the BL to avoid a mistake I made last year.
- The older content had more of the gyno-style of porn but the newer isn't as bad, though it's still "In the Crack".
Bottom Line:
When I first started reviewing porn sites, I had standards, criteria but that was 12 years ago. I'm older now and probably dumber! What I do know though, every year around the American holidays, I join In the Crack. I do that because I'm always off some of December and it let's me download more than in other months. I won't call this the best site but I will say it's one of the top 2-3.
Porn, like so many other things, has tried to adapt to the consumers wants. Not In the Crack. They are still shooting the same porn they shot in 2001. It's 90% or more solo. The models look better here than on any site. The settings on this site are better than any other site. And every scene starts with the model fully dressed in appropriate clothes. Their makeup is near perfect and natural looking. The lighting is even top-notch. The only thing I could complain about with the content is it can be gynecological. But tell me, if you were told you were going to be a beautiful models gynecologist would you or I really complain?
One of my favorite parts is ITC is generally very selective of their models. And the ones that do good have multiple sets. An example of a model that they have multiple sets of who I think is fairly popular in mainstream porn, Gina Valentina, I've looked her content up on other sites but never downloaded and kept it. Her sets on ITC are some of the best on the site. I've always mentioned sites that make the models happy and how they seem to get better performances from the models. ITC does that.
The tiered memberships can be confusing, they have 6 tiers. I'll try to separate them:
Basic, Streaming and Standard all have major restrictions. The first two have no downloads of photos or videos. Standard has no photo downloads but does offer 360p and 720p video downloads.
Plus, 4K and Ultimate offer downloads of everything with Plus being my choice ($34.95), 4K just gives 4K videos on top of the Plus options. Ultimate ($69.95) brings in the next limits. It's completely unlimited. Standard, Plus and 4K have DL Limits (hourly, daily, monthly). Years ago, that was a major no-no but I have no problem staying within the limits. I download the 720p versions of the videos, most files average 450MB. I could easily run through 10GB (Hourly limit on Plus) in 15 minutes but because I am only downloading the last year's content, I only need to average about 4 sets/models per day, about 6GB. If I had never been a member and wanted to get all the content, I would pay for the Ultimate.
This content is unique because it's solo porn that starts out with the models looking very pretty, feminine even, lady-like and ends with them shoving their fist in themselves or a huge dildo. They cover everything in-between from teasing in their clothes (upskirts, bending over) to light touching and masturbation to the more "hardcore" masturbation. They're not in a rush like most 2018 porn seems to be.
It kind of makes me feel old as I start to tell about having to walk through 12 inches of snow to get to watch nicely-paced, erotic porn.
Not only are they the best at what they do but I'm not even for sure they have much competition these days. I wouldn't compare them to FTV since this is a little more personal than FTV. It's you and the model.
Navigation is as easy as possible. Coming up with a content count is a little harder. They've been releasing roughly 10 scenes per month since 2008. Before then they released usually 1 set per month and that goes back to 2001. It's well-over 1,200 scenes.
It's worth mentioning that I did not take points off for the split videos. They, like FTV, shoot each video with an action in it, then they split the video for the next action. It does allow you to download your favorite parts that way. I really don't know if I would prefer full videos but I'm okay with the split videos now.
I kept looking for 1 point to take off and found it while working on the review. The site logs me off about every 20 minutes. How is that for nitpicking?
This is very much a premium site. I know to some it's not premium, some will even hate it because they want hardcore or they want something ITC doesn't do but for me, a person who is rarely that happy with porn sites in 2018, it's perfect because it does what it says. It does it better than anyone else does. It reminds me of when you buy a music album and you don't have to skip one or two songs. For me, they get everything right. Except logging me off every 20 minutes.
In a few weeks, I'll have all of the 2018 content downloaded from ITC and this speaks to how much I like their content, I'll still be stopping by their site monthly to see who the new models are. I don't get that with other sites. I used to but now there's only 3-4 sites that get my attention throughout the year and ITC is one. I was due a 99 and honestly can only think of one other site that I would score this high.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The videos as the photos are of excellent technical quality (4k available)
Various actions: ass and pussy worship, dildo, closeups, anal, gyneco, lesbians, pissing
The girls are generally beautiful
There is a lot of content
The update is daily
Alternation of close-ups and wider shots
The design is nice and navigation in the site is easy
The videos and photos are taken in beautiful places
There are many nationalities of models
Content is totally exclusive
The scenes are described in detail
New membership options offer cheap formulas for low-demand customers
Upcoming updates are listed on the homepage
You can watch the pics in a lightbox and scroll them manually
There is a list of favorite models that can be classified according to different criteria
Cons:
Older content is not in high definition
You can not preview videos
The subscription is expensive for full HD and 4k and there is never a discount
Download is limited except for the ultimate formula which is very expensive (there is a download report)
The search function offer only the category option
The photos do not quite match the videos, which can be misleading
You can not automatically scroll photos in a slideshow
You can not create a personal favorites list
4k videos are not yet in H.265 format and are therefore big
Bottom Line:
One of my favorite sites even if I do not like anal, gyneco and the few pissing scenes. The action is well staged and well filmed. The girls of in the crack are less wild than those of FTV Girls but they are naughty just as much. In The Crack is a high quality site offering HD footage of their beautiful porn stars, American and European babes, and sexy amateurs posing nude, showing off their bodies, spread pussies, and gaped buttholes in extreme closeups while masturbating and teasing. The content quality has been fantastic for more than a decade and their 1080p and now 4k videos still look better than most. With an update everyday and over 1300+ original episodes online, In The Crack is a great pick for fans of insertions and closeups. It's a shame that price is so high, but In The Crack does not skimp on quality and quantity. The only big thing that is needed is a search engine with more features.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that doesn't do a lot of things, but does the things it does, better than any other site.
- Updates 3 times per week and the back catalog is older than 10 years.
- Feels like they're selling me a house, the locations, colors, brightness, contrast, are all exactly how I like them.
- New pricing plan, which I'll go into in the bottom line.
- In my opinion, the best photosets available.
- Videos are very good, but are sometimes gynecological.
- Every model on here looks better here than on any other site.
- 100% exclusive content.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Navigation is good as soon as you figure out "collections" means models.
Cons:
- A blunt one, it can become redundant.
- Another blunt one, some of the older videos have various problems, audio, video clarity, etc...
- Though in the pros, it has a con to it, the new pricing system
Bottom Line:
There's really not much to find wrong with In The Crack. Though I can completely understand those who don't like the extreme closeups.
It would be hard to pick out even one model who isn't worth checking out. The photosets are shot in a very realistic style, almost all sets start with the model fully clothed with plenty of clothing teases, up skirts, up shorts, panties sliding over and so on. Which is where there's a sharp contrast in the content. The later content in each set is the complete opposite. There's no teasing, it's up-close, in-your-face nudity. Fairly extreme or hardcore masturbation, if that's possible, and it's shot professionally.
This is one of the few sites I'll talk about having production values and great locations. It's like they dropped each model into a perfect environment. It's hard to believe this is a porn review. The woman's clothes often blends perfectly with the backgrounds (beaches, houses).
The new(er) pricing system allows a cheaper membership for those who don't download anything over 720p, it's $24.95/mo. and is perfect for me. Not that it's a huge difference, but I used to pay $34.95 for the site and only download the 720p versions of the videos.
They have multiple options including streaming only video, which also makes the site more accessible to those who are interested, but don't want to pay the premium price.
The main con of the site is you can and probably will get a little bored with it. It isn't because the content is boring, it's that the content is very similar from scene to scene.
The other con about audio and video issues is just based on maybe 8-12 scenes from the earliest years of the site (early 2000s).
Then there's the new pricing system's one con. It's $24.95 for 720p max download videos, BUT you cannot download the photo sets. My exact words were, "Are you fucking kidding me?" I like the photos as much, if not more than the videos, so I had to pay $10 more to receive zip downloads on the photos. That's frustrating. All of the payment options above the $24.95 price are based on being able to download larger video files.
So, if you prefer videos, but don't mind 720p resolution, the $24.95 option is a great deal. If you prefer pictures, you're going to have to pay the old regular price of $34.95. It lowered my score a bit. Still, I think they do their niche better than anyone and would recommend it to anyone.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful models
High Quality, polished videos
In your face format
Many popular models and porn stars
Some interesting lesbian scenes
Terrific views....
Tons of content (Since 2001!)
Unique tiered payment structure
Cons:
Not much to say here:
Some of the videos can be a bit slow, but the webmasters warn you.
Older vids are not HD (of course...)
Bottom Line:
When I first saw this site, I thought it was about anal. Yep. NOT about anal. It's about taking the best porn stars and models in the industry and showcasing their bodies. And I mean ALL of their bodies...up close and personal.
There is not a single male in any set on the entire web site. It's all about the girls.
From what I can tell, there are over 1200 video sets here, each with between 3 and 6 10-20 minute videos. For the most part, each set starts out with a basic strip segment showing off the girl's usually amazing physique, then there is a close-up/spreading segment, then a fingering session, then a dildo/vibrator session and then one or more sessions that might include peeing, an anal dildo session, a speculum, or just a conversation between the model and the photography crew.
The models here are hot, well built, popular and professional. Lucy Lu is here, Saphira is here, Elsa Jean is here, heck even Melena G is here doing things you would never see her do on Met Art. Yum! If you are somebody who really enjoys amazing bodies, unobstructed views and in-your-face close-ups, this is a terrific site for you.
The webmasters provide a little narrative for each segment, explaining what the girl does and giving a check-mark of approval to those they think are really good. They even warn you if a segment is a little too slow. Nice touch.
Many models have two or more complete sets. To me, this confirms that the girls are treated well by the photography team and that they enjoy the shoots.
Many of the shoots are in local (to the girls, I guess) hotels, but some are in exotic locations.
Lighting, focus, formatting, sets, props, toys and overall photographic/videographic details are excellent.
Oh, there are a few pretty good lesbian scenes, also. The format of these sets is a little different in that the girls are basically showing themselves and each other off for the camera. They are into each other for the most part, but they are basically going look at this girls pussy. Isn't it awesome!..or something similar. Some of these sets are pretty awesome, but some that you want to be REALLY awesome, Like Little Caprice and Melissa Mendini, are a little..awkward. And a few are just a bunch of hot models stripping down for the camera. Eh. Still some great views, though.
Navigation is good, allowing you to see things chronologically or by model. You can also select by model age (??), nationality and shoot location.
The tiered payment structure is worth mentioning. You can get streaming only for $10 a month, I think. Then the pice goes up depending on how big you want your downloads to be, up to 4K for the latest videos. unlimited 1080p downloads is $39 a month, I think.
This site reminds me a little of ALSScan, except that site is much more lesbian oriented and the girls are more into each other than the camera. This site is more polished, more professional...and the overall package puts In The Crack among the top 10 sites for me.
If you haven't figured it out yet, I highly, highly recommend this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Outstandingly beautiful models.
- Gigantic, colossal, mammoth (see thesaurus for more) amount of content. Site has been active since 2001.
- Fidelity to what they do. I don't know of any other site that has started with a mission and stuck to it as unwaveringly as ITC. My last join was in 2008 and even their front page has remained the same. Pristine, expedient, and efficient.
- Highest quality video, streaming and download. Dimensions offered for the latest vids are up to 3840 x 2160 at 3043 MB. When I click on this option, I get this message:
"The demands of 4k video (3840x2160) are very high. This technology is somewhat ahead of it's time and the great majority of viewers will not be able to play it..."
So I take the 1920x1080, which is crystal clear for me. I think I'd need a better pair of eyes to even be remotely interested in viewing the higher def vids.
- Zips for all pic sets. Dimensions are 1800x2400. Plenty big enough, unless we're in a biology lab.
-No crappy music!
Cons:
I was going to give the site a 99, but thought about it, and decided an 89 was more correct, because despite the fact that I think it's one of the best sites available for the kind of entertainment it provides, it could "improve" I think by stretching its horizons and being more creative. I suggest having the models DOING something more often, rather than just shuffling and clicking about on their heels on those amazing floors, or in those incredible outdoor environments. I dunno: do some cleaning, dishes, paint the walls, change a light bulb, rearrange a book shelf, fold some laundry, change a tire, make a Quiche Lorraine, hang some drapes, prune a palm tree, write a libretto, paint a picture, hang pictures, dust, write some memos, iron some shirts, do some plumbing, install a battery, clean the pool, split an atom Something, besides just swiveling, swaying, sashaying and making me feel like a creep while I stare at every inch of their perfectly lovely beautiful girly bodies.
Bottom Line:
35 USD for a month's access to all this content is highway robbery. And what I mean by that is, we are robbing THEM. If you have an up-to-date machine or device, you can get 35 dollars worth of adult entertainment here in about a few minutes.
It would be fair if they said, "look, you give us the 35 clams, and you get 24 hours to take what you can from us, then you're done. You want more, you gotta pony up some more dough."
In 24 hours, with a good connection and/or PC or device, you could get, in one day, what you would have paid thousands of dollars for not that long ago.
My personal, subjective score for this site would be a 100, but I don't think that would fly with the owners of THIS site, or with my fellow PUsers. The 89 is my objective score, since I actually DO think they could be more imaginative and get the models to do other stuff besides what they currently do.
My bottom, bottom line is: this is the best value on the Internet that I know of for the kind of content that I like. My downloading speeds have been ridiculously fast, and I've had no problems at all.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
OK, I'm now in my second month. I like the site a lot and had a few chats with the webmaster that make me like it more.
See my first impressions in my comments when I first signed up. (I questioned the high ($35/month) price tag and whether it was worth it.)
After I got used to the unusual but efficient navigation, I'm finding a lot more good stuff than I expected initially.
-Easy to use search functions. It's got a decent user evaluation system and has user comments about each model/scene.
-Nice commentary is provided by the site for each scene. They even identify their idea of the best scenes by embedding a small check mark in the commentary.
- Gorgeous models and locales. Each set identifies the shooting location even though the locations aren't significant to the primary purpose of the site.
There currently are 1,077 sets (as of 9/4/15), each with, normally, 3 or four separate parts. Many models have just one full set but several also have multiples
Cons:
- Some of the scenes are slow (languid, almost) which is OK for a short spell, but they can be achingly boring. (How long can you watch a babe's snatch while she writhes around on her back?) Reminds me of the First Time Video site where they can spend a lot of time on a single activity that makes me go for the fast forward button.
To their credit, the site mentions such situations in their commentary so if you're like me (no patience), you'll like this aspect.
There is no multi-month pricing so make sure you can handle the $35 per month price tag if you plan on sticking around awhile. I'd love to but I'm afraid my budget cannot handle it.
Bottom Line:
The site has a disarmingly large amount of content, which I'm still going through, but so far I haven't seen a single male doing anything to any of these babes. That's not to say they aren't working the hell out of a wide variety of "toys."
For those into solo peeing, there's quite a bit of that in this site. There are one or two scenes with two models involved in some water sports.
If you like seeing babes stuff unusual stuff up their twats you won't be disappointed. Ice cream, pearls, ice cubes, bananas (squished inside) and other stuff.
There are some scenes featuring creative uses for panties, stuffing and heavy duty wedgies, for example.
Out of the 1077 sets there are only 25 sets with any lesbian action and no males anywhere.
Being an aficionado of material that explores every inch of solo gorgeous babes in HD, I'm really OK with that.
My score reflects my personal preference for the content provided. I don't consider price in my evaluation but if I did I would dock them a few points for their comparatively high price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Video and Zip Gyno views of ass and cunnie. Fast downloads. Erotic places they shoot. Site is fast. Really a fun site. New look.
Cons:
I wish they had ne option to download the whole video shoot. I would really like to see some behind photo and video stuff. Interaction stuff like ALS. Girls being told what to do, if possible.
Bottom Line:
If you want inthecrack ass and cunnie stuff you found the site from day one they are true to their theme. ASS and the hole. Cunny too. Zip and Videos and easy site to navigate. Great exotic locations like going on vacations really nice places and the girls of course. They sure see some really exotic places. Why I don't know but the models are really slut and love to show it. the cunt and asshole and cracks. the site must drill into their heads that this is what they booked you do. I think the girls arrive all whore.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
[+] HQ Pictures
[+] HD Videos
[+] Good Photo Shoot Quality
[+] Nice Models/Newest Girls
[+] Growing Content since 2001
Cons:
[-] High Price
[-] No Hardcore
[-] Navigation/Design Could Improve
Bottom Line:
INTRODUCTION
In the Crack is all about capturing, both on videos and pictures, some of the hottest models most intimate body parts. This website focuses on softcore from striptease to solo masturbation with both pussy and anal insertion.
MODELS
[+] The good about In the Crack is the models and how sexy they can be on camera. Whether you enjoy them on videos or pictures, the girls are pretty, sexy, gorgeous and know how to flex their body in the sexiest positions you'll ever see. They also perform solo masturbation after they gave you a teasing striptease.
CONTENT
[+] There is an update every 3 days or so and it goes back to 2001 so the archive contains almost 700 scenes of 60 minutes each. The girl usually stripteases gradually until she gets completely naked after which she masturbates with dildos and sex toys both vaginal and anal. There are no hardcore scenes as the website focuses on softcore only with some lesbian scenes. The action takes place both inside and outside with nice and luxurious sets.
[-] There is hardcore sex at all. The content type is limited with softcore, masturbation and female lesbianism. It may also feels redundant after a while...
VIDEOS
[+] Each scene is downloadable in different quality formats including a HD version up to 1920x1080. One scene is about 60 minutes which is good for a solo performance.
[-] There is no streaming option so you have to download a scene entirely as you can't download individual parts of the video.
PICTURES
[+] Each gallery has over 150 high quality pictures offered in both small and large sets via thumbnails clicking or .ZIP sets. The shots are very good and professional.
NAVIGATION/DESIGN
[+] It is simple and user friendly. One can't really get lost in it as it is very basic. The website is fast as well as the download speed. You can browse the models database using a powerful search tools with filters such as their age, nationality or the shooting location. You also get a sneak preview of the next updates.
[-] The design could improve a little although it is clean a new template could not hurt considering that they've been using the same design for a very long time.
PRICE/ACCESSIBILITY
[-] Unfortunately, In the Crack is too expensive for what it offers. There is only membership option at $35/month. You get no special offers or bonuses or even rewards such as discounts for loyalty.
CONCLUSION
Despite all the pros, there are some cons that may harm In the Crack's potential. The content is very good for what it is meant to deliver, the models list is impressing and the quality is very good but the lack of variety and hardcore sex might get you bored after a while unless you are a softcore fan and don't really care about hardcore. The price is kind of high for what it gives.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Excellent quality and HD
Massive content .
Awesome interface and navigation.
Cons:
Scenes are similar and same consistency.
Looks like many scenes at the same places.
Lots of close ups, ( too many my opinion )
Bottom Line:
Knowing there was a more recent review I tried to think of a better approach then saying the obvious
and repeat what was just said three weeks ago.
I agree with the previous review, therefore I will
share my experience.
Good.
The site is an amazing experience, it is easy to use and navigation is simple and intuitive.
The quality is awesome and brings out incredible details.
The site download speed was good and no problems with my downloads at all. Picture quality was equally impressive with great details and contours were clear.
This site sets a great example of simplicity and ease and invites the user to surf without feeling like your chopping branches through the jungle to get the the fruit. This site is about ease of use and providing a great experience.
The bad:
I found the site repetitive and for myself why the site is amazing the scenes were after awhile same ole same ole. Now some may not agree, this was my "own" experience. I also did not like the place of scenes often seemed to be around the same places. There is not allot to say wrong about this site. To be far many sites are the same in content. I this being the site is based on a niche makes it seem more so.
Hard to compete with such and awesome review before this one. So I chose more personal review input.
CT Take:
Join for sure, it is worth the money and time and after this you will wish other sites ran like this one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- This site continues to push the technical quality boundaries and probably has the highest production value of any site.
- Numbers will be broken down in the bottom line. The video quality is and has been at 1920x1080 for a good while. The picture quality also is an impressive 2400x1800 in "large" quality and come zipped.
- While the update frequency may not be comparable to some of the big networks, they average between 10-11 updates per month.
- The settings on this site are different from most sites you will join. From tropical locations to indoors at large houses to farms and lush fields. The outfits are also fitting of the settings. The only site I know of that goes through this much setup is ALS Scan.
- You'll be hard-pressed to find a model who isn't attractive.
- Download speeds are excellent (95% of max)
- Navigation is easy to use and also gives you the options to search by year, model name, age, nationality and location.
- Will further these in the BL.
Cons:
- Probably the only real valid con. I think there should be more pictures in the photo sets. Maybe 300 even. It's a con that's a compliment. The pictures are some of the best I've seen, but they skip a lot of the teasing seen in the videos.
- I'm still going to complain about the price, but I only join it once per year so it's not a very big complaint. I use it as my Christmas present to myself.
- This one was more frustration than anything. There was a few days where the site would open, models could be viewed, but when you clicked on a model, it wouldn't let me go into the download section. Lasted 3-4 hours each time. It only happened twice though.
Bottom Line:
This re-review started out as one of the harder ones I've done. I have mostly joined networks the past year and at first found myself frustrated with the update frequency of In The Crack. Keeping in mind, I had all the content I wanted coming into 2011's updates. It almost was enough of an initial letdown to stop me from rejoining this year, but they had 4 Jinx/Jynx Maze updates and that pushed me to join. As the subscription has went on, my respect and enjoyment from this site keeps growing. This will be slightly different than most reviews I write.
Production values of this site have made me notice production values. I wanted to bitch and gripe about the "only" 11 or so average of updates per month, but when I started looking at the sets, I realized it wouldn't be possible to make that many updates. They have settings ranging from tropical beaches to large houses to country/farm settings and the models' outfits fit the settings accordingly. When I compare this to the majority of sites I have joined in the last year where the setting is almost always the same, the outfits are almost always the same or similar at least, it made me look at this site differently.
On August 13th, 2007, ITC had their first 1920x1080 video, ironically, featuring the model August. Considering this site has been around since 2001, it may sound like half their content would be lesser quality, but it's not true. ITC's original problem was lack of updates. So for once, a lack of updates in the early years of a site's life is going to really help here. An example of this: For the year 2002, they had a total of 11 updates...for the whole year. In May of 2011, they had 13 updates just for May.
As of February 20th, 2012, they have 622 scenes. Of those, 509 have the 1920x1080 option. Those 509 have three video options, 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 640x360. The earlier 113 scenes have two video options of 640x480 and 320x240. This made me re-think complaining about updates since they are releasing 100+ updates per year now, combined with the high production value and high technical quality. Another thing I have noticed about their content is if they have a model I collect or consider a favorite, their content of her will be near or at the top of my list of her content. This is especially true of the pictures. Now I have a complaint.
If I could change one thing about this site it is that I would add more pictures to the sets. With all the time and probably money spent on the best models, settings, outfits, why not bump those picture sets up to 300 or more photos? It would flesh out the updates too.
Possible con for some and I originally listed it as a con in my last review, but I think there is a reason for this. The videos do not have a full scene download option, they are each broken into parts and the parts represent a certain action you're going to see in each part. One part is pissing, one part is stripping, one part is masturbation, one part is close-ups and you get the drift. I would guess these different actions require moving to different locations in the setting and also think it gives the members a choice of what they want to see since I know some are disgusted by pissing, even the close-ups, so you can pick and choose what you want. A full scene option would be nice, since if I like a model, I'm going to download all parts anyway, but I'm more neutral on it than calling it a pro or con.
You will occasionally get the feeling of the scenes being formulaic, but I'm thinking that's what they're going for. You're going to get what you expect from each scene. This is again where I think more photos in the sets would make an improvement.
Another thing I think could help here is more girl/girl scenes. By my count, out of the 622 scenes, they have 17 girl/girl scenes with at least one being girl/girl/girl. Their lesbian scenes are easily some of the best I've seen. I don't even think it needs to become a regular part of the site, but maybe 1 or 2 per month just to break the monotony of the formulaic solo scenes.
With all this being said, I think they suceed at creating a different and unique porn site. I would estimate after this last membership that I have around 90% of their content and have yet to delete one scene. That far outweighs giving me 1,000s of scenes that I will only keep a handful of. It's one of those that I can't recommend highly enough. I do think viewing the content with an open mind, noticing the production value, the work that is put into the sets, adds even more to its value. I still won't join more than once per year though. In a way though, maybe that's a positive too? Instead of joining every 3 months and sifting through the tons of updates, I know I'm downloading most everything new for the past year.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Decent Updates
- Stunning Models
- Easy to download ZIP files
- HD Video
- Easy to navigate
- Lots of spread leg poses :-)
- Lots of leg and heels
- nice close up shots
- great headshots in some of the sets
- High resolution
Cons:
- Updates are not frequent enough
- No boots (not many, maybe one set)
- Price is kind of too high (36 bucks)
Bottom Line:
I really have enjoyed ITC for the past few months and they've been getting some new models lately. But I would love to see some of the old models make a return visit. Like Lilly Lux who only has 4 sets. I would love to see her return! Also Marlena with 2 sets, and Betty Saint who has a whooping 5 sets. I love these ladies and they have made my fantasies more enjoyable. Lilly Lux for example has a nice bubbly round bouncy ass that I would love to tear up. These girls tease and tease you right. The photography is absolutely stunning but could use some updating and more true high resolution detail. It seems kinda fuzzy when enlarging to full rez. I prefer a detailed photo ala Denys Defranco. I like to see the pores in the womens faces. Maybe because they seem like they are right in front of you (in the bedroom with you) Am I nuts? I don't believe I am but this site will get you into a whacking frenzy I tell you. Beware of this. Just be careful, take your time and browse through. I believe this site has much potential.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-really good quality vids and pics
-easy to use site
-enthusiastic development
-multiple vid sizes
-good looking models
-good naming scheme
Cons:
-file sizes can be too big
-a lot of repetitive content
-bunch of fake boobs
-you can see imperfections in HD
-cant zip pics
-incomplete strip scenes
Bottom Line:
ive been putting off joining this site for quite some time, but finally joined it. the joining fee is kinda high, but you do get your moneys worth.
the site is well designed. it is sorted by date, but you can search by model or keyword as well. from 2007 and forward theres 1080p, 720p & 640x360. i would have liked 960x540 there too, i feel its the best for people who want quality video but not huge file sizes. download speed was fast, and worked with downloadthemall (firefox download manager). the pictures were high quality but i was surprised how small they were, rarely bigger then 2mp. also there was no zip options. the website guy seems to have fun, the naming scheme on the scenes are quite funny and get a chuckle from the puns throughout the website.
i joined to ogle the female form. i really didnt care about the masturbation scenes, but the few i did download i wasnt blown away by. they were almost too softcore. i love the striping and walking scenes. one thing that REALLY annoyed me was the majority of stripping scenes ended with the panties still on. then the next scene theyd be totally nude but on a bed.
theres some truly beautiful models, they will blow your mind. but i feel the site over uses them. i got bored after seeing the same model do the same stuff over and over again
great website overall, tho i prefer ftv for softcore models being payful
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the highest quality technical sites on the internet. Breakdown in bottom line.
- Updates started slow in 2001, but are now coming at a rate of roughly 3 per week, includes photos and videos per update.
- Several models you won't see on many other sites and some I've never seen on other sites, the positive to that, also has most of the usual stars.
- Picture sets are zipped and can be downloaded in small or large sizes.
- Plenty of tease, plenty of masturbation and plenty of close-ups.
- Locations are usually almost as beautiful as the models.
- Models, for me, are as close to 100% downloads. Very few if any models that aren't stunningly attractive.
- Navigation is good once you get the hang of it.
- Download speed hasn't been a problem am downloading at 95% of my max speed.
Cons:
- Videos are split into parts. Almost didn't put this here in cons since there is a pattern to the splits. One may be the lead-in/tease. The next pissing. The next masturbation. The splits don't so much overlap as older split videos did.
- Video quality on older sets pales in comparison to the newer videos.
- Photo sets could be bigger. Seeing that the scenes as a whole total nearly an hour on average, anything less than 100 photos seems to be shorting the photo fans.
Bottom Line:
I thought I would try to review this site a little differently than normal. The reason being, early in the site's life the updates were sporadic and the quality was okay. They've picked up the pace quite a bit while improving the technical quality a great deal.
From March 2001 to August 5, 2007 the site had a total of only 113 updates. That's less than 2 per month. The quality on these videos tops out at 640x480 and the lower quality option is 320x240.
The photos during this time ranged from 758 high end to 1800 high end.
Starting on August 13th, 2007 the videos top quality jumped to 1920x1080, there also is a 1280x720 option and a 640x360 option.
Besides the big upgrade in quality, the updates started coming more often. Since August 2007 through November 2010, there has been 367 updates or an average of roughly 10 updates per month and all have been with the 1920x1080 option.
The pictures got another boost in late 2007 to 2000 high end and later in 2008 went up to 2400 high end.
I just found that worth mentioning since not only have they increased their updates around 400%, but tripled the technical quality too. That makes the price (35 USD) not a con. It's nice to see a site changing everything for the better.
Problems with the site, there are speculum parts, pissing parts and the close-ups may be a bit much for some. The good thing here, these are usually separated by part so if you would have fast-forwarded those parts, you can just save the hassle by not downloading the parts you don't like.
No problems with the models at all. A very good blend of models from all around the world and a good mix of ethnic backgrounds.
Navigation is broken down for you. You can search by model name. Model nationality. Model age. Year released. And a few bonus points here for naming the videos whatever the scene is named. Instead of some generic number name that no one but their programmer understands.
Unless I missed something there are no boy/girl scenes, but there are some girl/girl scenes with the vast majority being solo. I'm thinking I'm going to need to ask Santa Claus for a new hard drive just for the content I get from this site.
By percent, 76% of the sets are available in 1920x1080. I'm almost positive no other site can say that. My biggest surprise was the diversity of models. It looks to have started out with more Euro models, but it has balanced out with Hispanic, Asian, American (white and black) models showing up too.
I guess if I had to pick something to change it would be to offer a full scene download for those of us that have fast connections. Oh and it signs me out too often. A download had finished, maybe 5 minutes passed and I clicked the next scene to download and was signed out.
That's minor though when you consider the overall quality of this site. Would push the score even higher if the photo sets had more photos in them. Highly recommended especially for tech quality lovers.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
See Denner Review that says it all.
High Speed Downloads
Vast library of porno to play around exploring, there are porno girl gems, lots of hot girls being XXX.
INTC is true to their theme with excellent xxx graphic videos and zip files of all their releases The asscrack and the cunt is in your face.
PSE performance. For the 98% of the time the girls are total xxx porno whores for your viewing pleasure. GYNO.
Beautiful Locations for Shoots
Solo XXX enjoy
Cons:
None
Bottom Line:
If solo gyno and viewing the most beautiful girls is your thing go to this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mostly top-quality videos and stills (primarily from 2007 and forward)
Top models - euro and US and a little from elsewhere
Maybe some of the best full body (teasing) scenes - and of course a LOT - too many - close ups.
Here you get a lot of kinds of strip tease, posing ect. - and done in professional, erotic and sexy ways.
Variation of models
Download manager allowed - thank you (LARGE files)
Good preview - apart from the fact that you do NOT get much videos as preview.
The way the models act, are done with make-up and the final quality - nobody else have this kind of quality!!!!
Zip for PHOTOSETS
Cons:
High price!!! ($ 34.95)
Still got that DAMN regional pricing - could not get it other ways, so it was - EURO 34.95 - over $ 40.
No full scene downloads - BUT: ok, the files are so large that a full scene - joined - is mostly over 2,5-3 GBs.
Older from 2007/2006 and back are NOT great quality
TOO much close ups - BUT that the name in the game: "In The Crack" - so be prepared to a LOT of pussy/anal close ups.
Updates are not in the top league - 10-12 a month - both videos and stills.
Top quality video files ( all WMV) are simply TOO large - this quality can work in less seize...
Only solo - and some lez.
Bottom Line:
First of all:
THANKS TO DROOLER for bringing this site to my attention - even if it's some time ago.
So I've been looking/hunting/browsing this site for some time before I got to this - hesitated because I really dislike that regional pricing shit, but ok:
Can't resist anymore!
Why?
Because the deal here is very simple to the solo-girl lover: You'll get some magnificent performance from some of the best looking teens/girls/models around - Euro, Easteuro, Latin and US-models.
Done in maybe the best way to day for solo-videos at all.
I've seen them all elsewhere - so it's not new models - but In The Crack has something else: it's the way the scenes are done, the quality (from around 2008 and up till now) that are so special.
They have several scenes with Lexa: http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/melisa.html
Great looking girl - but at In The Crack - her videos are close to heaven...
Well, check out the preview.
Even good old Shawna Lenee has the best solo videos, I've seen
All video-files are split - and all in WMV - but since the (each) files are so large - it's not a problem - and you join them if you want.
You get more than 400 videos here - ok, split up (in LARGE clips) and alomst 100 great models - the price is high - and apart from the regional shit - I still think it's worth it - have not regretted my join....
Three sizes of videos (640x360 - 1280x720 - 1920x1080)
Those large video files are sometimes over 1 GB - and if you download all - man, you're going to need pretty much space..
Stills - photosets are: 2400x1800 - for the later stills.
Bottom line - this In The Crack has so much potential and some very erotic/sexy solo material that I got to hand it a 95 for: Quality, sexy performance, models and the way the girls are handled in the videos... still a bit too expensive, regional pricing a big CONS - but a lot of fine material will fill your hard disk a little too fast - because the content is worth it.....
You got to check out this site, if you have not been here, yet...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ small sample videos - good for those with bandwidth usage issues
+ All newer content (see con about dates) is available in 3 resolutions 640x360 @ 1500+ kb/s, 1280x720 @ 3900+ kb/s and 1920x1080 @ 7800+kb/s
+ Searches by 32 fetish preferences (Breasts, Panties, Treadmills, Ass Jiggling, Clitoris Views, etc.) and by release date, model name or keyword (See con)
+ No in-your-face upsells
+ You'd knock over your best friend to get a chance to date most of the models
Cons:
- No alphabetical model search - you can put them in ABC order, but the pages are numbered, not lettered
- You can order episodes by release date, but the files aren't dated
- File names don't have the model's name - they're numbered along with the scene title
- A few videos have no audio (I really don't get that at all on this site)
- No date information on files
- Average to poor server speeds
- $35 a month is high
- No multi-month discount
- Won't remember login - have to type it in everytime you access the site
- Use of download manager is tricky (See bottom line)
- I'm pretty much strictly video now but, just for the review, I'll mention that the pictures, while available in 2 sizes and in zip files, they only average about 80 per model and come in oddly cropped shapes, as in not uniform sizes.
Bottom Line:
I can't believe I haven't done a review for this site before now. This is my third trip in and I have to say the content is as hot as ever. The girls are among the best looking anywhere on the 'Net and the photography is awesome. While some have said that the angles and serious zooming they use in their shoots is annoying, I think it's one of the things that makes ITC stand out in a class by itself. Up close and *very* personal. The video quality is the other thing that makes them a leader in the porn biz. I stay with the 1280 resolution because it looks as good on my TV as DVDs from my standalone player. The 1920 file sizes are just more than I need - no sense in tying up gigabytes when the 1280s are already crystal clear.
But - there *are* a few things on the down side. One thing I don't remember is the server speed and how it dishes out files on my download manager. I have FreeDownloadManager set to grab 8 sections at a time. By default, I get 1 section from here and it's sometimes slow to connect even on the first chunk. When I try to manually add another section, sometimes it goes, sometimes it doesn't. On the larger files, after 10 or more tries to add sections, I managed to get up to 4, for a top speed of a respectable 1 MB/s, but on most, I could only get 2, for a top speed of around 600 KB/s. I'm thinking this is what they've substituted for a download limit, which is okay by me. I can line up a bunch of files, walk away and check 'em out later. I just wish the files had the model's name instead of a number, and it would be nice to see the episode release dates. I also don't remember the site not being able to remember your login - it has to be manually typed in every time. This site has enough content now that it needs a revamp of it's search function and probably the site navigation in general. A keyword or fetish search is nice, but finding a model isn't all that easy.
Two of my pet peeves exist here. There are more than a few model with silicone tits, but they all appear to have been done by damn good surgeons. I didn't see any obvious scars and none of 'em were "overdone". There are also some models who overplay the sex with that open-mouthed look that I think looks cheap. But, because the focus is rarely on a model's face, it didn't seem as distracting as it usually does to me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ A near literal translation of its name; this site can define the closeup genre.
+ Nearly 300 naturally beautiful models in 325 shoots.
+ Excellent use of technology; newer videos (shoot #114 and above) are offered in 1920x1080 @ 9MB/s .wmv.
+ Great photography up to 2400x1900; near perfectly lit, lots of wide angle closeups, great colors and details.
+ Model action is pretty diverse and interesting; girl-girl, toys, weird insertions, anal, peeing.
+ Fully archived content all the way to the very beginning in 2001.
+ Downloads are as fast as they are big: I have gotten speeds of up to 1.5 MB/s!
+ Little behind the scenes content, almost no off camera talking or interference.
+ Billing through CCBill.
Cons:
- $35/month is high, and there are no recurring or multi-month discounts available.
- Graphic, screen-filling closeups and certain content (queefing, douching, pissing, etc.) may not be every member's favored approach to porn.
- First eight shoots are video only.
- Earlier photography is smaller, around 1024x800.
- Lots of wide angle lens used, and unconventional photo cropping done; for example, some photos are 1800x1800.
- Though navigation is simple and clean, the search engine may be too weak for some, and it only applies to videos.
- Ethnically homogeneous; few really 'exotic' models, vast majority are white north Americans and eastern Europeans.
- I still wish there was a little more girl-girl content.
Bottom Line:
I have been a member of the 'Crack on four separate occasions over the last few years, and every time I am more than happy to fork over the money and fill up my hard drives some more -- they keep adding models but never stray too far from the close-is-not-close-enough approach.
Yes, this site is deep within the glorious chasm of the female nether regions, and it is more than happy to bring you along! I love a good girl models-only site, but they take things to a unique macroscopic level of enjoyment and seem to revel in it the whole time. There are more than a few times when video camera lens are fogged up or hit by flying body fluids...and if you have to think about this and still ask, then this site may not be for you. In a more technical way of putting it, lots of wide angle lens are used, and though you see plenty of models stripping and posing, the emphasis is below the belt at distances best measured in fractions of an inch.
That having been said, I love the presentation of their perverted arts. For the last four years they have offered videos in beautiful 1920 x 1080 .wmvs at very high bit rates. They are big files, but the payoff is eye candy that only a handful of current sites can reasonably rival. As I stated above, lighting is excellent, never harsh, and only occasionally do they use an obvious additional light source, like a small pen light when, say, a model is rocking a speculum (again, not everyone's type of porn).
They do not slouch on photography either. These are great photos with bright colors, the same professional lighting and care in details, which are pretty important in this closeup work. They don't really use conventional sizes in photos; there are numerous square butthole shots (the literal Crack of their title), and quite a few panoramic shots of models relaxing on a couch or bed. But photos are still big and never so Photoshopped to make models' corresponding videos have glaring differences.
I find it easy and fast to get to the content, as download speeds feel turbocharged. I regularly get 1.5MB/s, so even the biggest videos say a 30 minute video at nearly 2GB in size came in between five and seven minutes, if that. Combine this with no download limit and your hard drive may start looking for a new owner. The flip side is that there is a limit of twenty connections at a time, so as to discourage members from using download managers, or at least stop people from queuing up tons of downloads (I can just hear badandy400 cursing at this one), but you still get lots of downloading down in a relatively short period of time.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Stunningly beautiful girls. Some of the best on the internet. The girls are from the US, Canada, Hungary or the Czech Republic and the scenes are shot in those locations also.
-Huge site. Despite not being part of a network, there is really a lot here. There are 271 updates, each is about 3 to 6 clips of between 3 to 15 minutes. Some are longer.Three download options, only WMV.
-Nice text description and screenshot for each video. Truly helpful.
-Most videos can be downloaded as almost 1080i HD 1280x720 or 1080p superior HD 1920x1080. This is truly great quality and as good as any site I have ever joined-very highly recommended.
-High quality photo sets for each update.
Cons:
-No search engine. Just like FTVgirls, the updates are listed in order. There are multiple videos and photo sets for each girl, but no easy way to find all of them. The so called search engine doesn't function well. It looks for keywords in the text describing each video. If you look for "black" you may get "black dress" or "black earrings" etc. Not helpful if you want to find all the peeing videos or the strip ones.
-No support for download managers. Very slow tedious downloads if you have to look at descriptions of easily 1000 videos and then download the ones you want one at a time.
-No ethnic, age or bodyshape variety. I found two Asian models and two Black ones.
Bottom Line:
The site has solo girl videos (there are also a few lesbian videos that are ok) that focus on either stripping, displaying assets, masturbation, looking inside with a speculum, or peeing. Most videos showcased their pussy or ass or both, but some focused on their face or moving erotically while fully clothed. Nice mix that provides some variety.
While I did not find all of the videos to be my taste, there are lots and lots of scenes to choose from.
The girls on the site are professional models, and a few are pornstars. This is both a big plus as well as a minus. The plus is that they are quite attractive, are well made up and know how to move erotically. They manage to not look like typical pornstars-no fake boobs, only a few fake blonds, no fake moaning or overacting.
Generally they play up to the camera in a sensual way that works well. Picture a girl pushing her pussy right in your face and then opening her lips to show you what's inside. By looking directly at the viewer, they generally create a personal link that can be very appealing as well as arousing. The minus to professionals is that they are totally dispassionate and are just doing a job. No enthusiasm, no feeling of daring exhibitionism as you would get with real non pro amateurs. The camera work is close to perfect. I feel most porn camera work is terrible and hurts more than helps videos. Here it is done right.
Specifically, the shots are straight ahead, no diagonals except for the earliest videos. Next each video starts with a focus on whole girl and only gradually moves in for closeups. This is a slow process that creates a buildup to the best parts at the end. Many times I preferred the buildup to the the extreme closeups.
The sets are a big plus also. Most sites use a house, even a hotel room. Here you get outdoors in the Virgin Islands or great homes in the Czech Republic, for example. Makes for a very professionl, polished, well planned video.
The only reasons for not giving the site an even higher score is the lack of a search engine, the lack of support for download managers, and the lack of variety in the models. It is very good for what it is, but it cannot be described as all that I hope for in a 90 level website. Overall a very creative and interesting way to showcase solo models that I hope other sites imitate.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The pictures are fant-ass-tic: If you have a flat screen monitor that can fit these 2400 X 1700; 2200 X 1800;2400 x 1600
# new model every 2 days
#video comes in 2 min; 8-10minute; or 15+ min size; 3-10 videos per model
# about 240 models issues
some models have multi shoots
#this is a must site for hi def vid lovers; ass jiggling lover; upskirt lovers; in your face panty vids; in your face ass grabbing and shake the booty in you face; spread cheeks apart; pee videos--get ready to lie on the floor facing skyward, because thats the view..
# oh and pussay in your face; dildo in pussay in your face, and speculum shots
#the models are gorgeous and top notch
#If you have hi speed internet and a large screen monitor and love porn; this site is an easy top five site..
# top five site for hi rez pictures
#download zip files; small or large; 14.6 mb for small; 56.4 mb for large pics (per 20) pics..
#vids come in 640 x 360; 1280 x 720; 1920 x 1080
Cons:
# the pics blow up so big, I can't see them on my tiny laptop screen...
#will have to have the latest technology to fully enjoy this site.
#my wireless internet takes two hours to download a 12 minute video!
#the hi def vid files are huge and you will have to have the harddrive space; or an exterior hard drive to save them all.
$34.95 month membership price is higher than avg.
# there is ususally just one photo series per model issue avg 85-140 pics ( though some of the models have multiple issues.
# their is no sex on site..
Bottom Line:
I reccomend this site as a must see for those with hi speed connections; large flat panel screens; and a love for a lot of Hi def video and pics. This site very much is for those with this technology to enjoy what it has to offer.In fact, I would reccomend In the crack collections of vids and pics against the top video sites; including FTV girls. In the crack no doubt is shot a lot closer thatn FTv girls, titties jiggling in your face; tons of bootay shaking; speculum, masterbation, dildoes, upskirts and picture views as if you are looking straight up.
However, if you don't have this technology or a lot of room on your hard drive; then I can't suggest it for you. I don't have hi speed internet so I can't download the 17 minute video. unless I am willing to be downloading for three hours.. for this reason, I probably will wait to rejoin when I have hi speed connection...I really can't see the whole sight.
you will see lots of pee video with her puss inches from your face; some vids have the model sit in the chair with their legs spread apart peeing straight up like a geyser. Also, some Virgin Island shoots with beautiful models on the beach in their bikinis.
they will shake their titties and booty in your face. Trust me, your face is always inches away the whole time makeing some great vids..
but I can look at the pics are spectacular; some beautiful loaclas; all with with bead of water, pore of skin sharpness..
If I had hi speed internet; I would be on this site all the time; but I don't so I likely will be missing out on a lot of the site...
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large amount of content
- Very good visual quality in pics & videos
- Videos available up to full 1080p @ 8mbps
- Pictures up to 2000px on the long end with zip downloads
- Fast, I mean FAST download speeds
- Simple, yet straightforward navigation
- More frequent update schedule as of July 08
- Their "tour" allows you to see everything
Cons:
- Very expensive
- Some pictures cropped to lower pixel resolutions
- Too much focus on the ass (may be a "pro" for others)
- No official support for download managers
Bottom Line:
This is my 3rd tour with ITC. I used to buy their videos using their antiquated token system but it got prohibitively expensive. Now that they're all inclusive, I can go back and complete the old video collections.
If you're looking at reviews for this site, you're probably interested in this very unique type of content. Those into "glamour" or "artsy" porn need not apply. But if you want nothing left to the imagination, this site is in a world of its own.
The quality of models have improved a lot since I was last on their site. But the focus on more professional models means that some of the fresh faces they had in the past aren't likely to crop up again (Rachel & Natasha were my 2 faves).
All their videos are segmented, I didn't list this as either pro or con since everyone will see this a little differently. i.e... I love pissing scenes but not everyone does so it's nice to be able to grab just the videos you're interested in. If you like it all, I've got good news for you. If you have bandwidth, you wont have too many problems downloading the 1080p videos. I routinely saw one megabyte/second avg speeds. A few videos came in _averaging_ 1.8 megabytes/sec which surprised me since that's faster than my connection's theoretical max.
Visual quality of videos and pictures are great. My only complaint would be that color saturation tends to be a bit flat in most videos, but some might appreciate the truer, more natural color balance.
Also, their "tour" isn't so much a tour. You can actually go in and see all their video/photo shoots with full descriptions of every scene by clicking on the Models link. You just need a membership to access the photos or download videos. What you see is what you get. I wish every site approached acquiring new members this way.
What would make it perfect in their niche? A lower price for one. I think $25/mo is appropriate, even $30 would be acceptable. I'd like to see an even, 50/50 focus on pussy & ass. More clit shots! They have the perfect opportunity to capture what I consider the most elusive view in all of porndom.
Despite the high price, I'm letting this one renew.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of content available.
- Beautiful models, mostly professional.
- Videos are top-end and can be downloaded in different sizes (you can view specs in guest tour). Fewer options with older material.
- Zip files for pics, in medium or large.
- Photo quality is superb, often simply stunning.
- Detailed descriptions for each video.
- No DRM.
- Search function for type of vids you want to see.
- Lots of options for how you wish view each pic set.
Cons:
- Site borders on fetishism on two accounts: anal and watersports. Way too many pee-pee videos.
- Sometimes the camera angle is disorienting and downright annoying. Even stupid at times.
- That "fish-eye" lens thing can be silly and makes all the models look like Jennifer Lopez with butt-implants. Not that there's anything wrong with a big ass.
- While downloading, you can't open any of the pictures. Haven't tried to DL 2 vids at once but that's probably disallowed.
- Speculum shots are pretty much useless, as far as I can tell.
Bottom Line:
Ever imagine what it might be like to have Eve Angel park her delectable keester on your face? Well, this place will give you a pretty good idea. As someone else said, this site is all about ass. It's ass directly in your mug, for extended periods of time. It's a flea's-eye view of the female anus in all its pursed and pleated glory. Oh, and let's not forget the vagina. You can see that too. Proctologists and gynocologists could use these clips for reference purposes. Did you ever wonder what a girl's pancreas looks like? You just might get a view.
While it's decidedly ass-obsessed, there are plenty of beautiful breasts to see as they are lathered, oiled, and bobbled. Personally, I could watch Alexis Love and Eve Angel wash their breasts for a good long while. I'd even offer to help if their hands got tired, seeing as I'm such a gentleman.
As for pics, I don't know of any site that offers such crisp, close, detailed photography of the female plumbing system. If you like pics of women from the ground up, or if you like to imagine what it would be like to be a beautiful woman's chair, this place is for you.
I don't know what else to say that hasn't been covered by the others. While I have nits in particular about the sometimes dizzying camera angles, and the sometimes puerile fixation on pee-pee, they are negligible when compared with the benefits of a membership here. I have a pic of Eve Angel winking at me on my desktop.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ CLOSEUP exclusive content! This site lives up to its name
+ Clear, well-lit photography, w/ newer vids in HD
+ Hot models (though they certainly don't focus on faces) who get creative: speculums, anal, peeing, toys, veggies...
+ Photos available to all members, and now, finally, all video as well
+ Some girl-girl
Cons:
- Pretty high price
- More girl-girl needed
- Closeups this closeup may not be for everyone
- Took them way too long to drop their token video system
- Older models have smaller pics
Bottom Line:
Love closeup photography? Well, this site is so far in the crack it's practically in the hole; this site takes the genre so far that any closer and these girls' cheeks and lips would be smudging the lens. Their bigger photos (1600x1200, some 2400x1800) are huge, and you can easily end up staring at a crack (or hole) bigger than your monitor, or even real life. You will probably spend a few hours just admiring the pics, or at least getting a detailed lesson on female anatomy.
It's a blessing that they finally dropped their stupid pay-per-view token video system, especially considering the price. The fact that they were doing this for so long - screwing over members who had already paid (and losing potential business) - is probably the biggest reason for not giving them a higher score. I first learned of this site after a friend showed me a video, but I was let down when I found out they were separate from the regular membership. Still, their photography can practically stand on its own, though their vids are also quite entertaining (queefing vags, winking assholes, masturbation, pissing). I personally prefer shorter clips (5-10mins) than longer, boring vids, but it does mean more DLs.
I think anybody who joins this site already likes this stuff, but there are a few who probably think this is aimed at gynecologists and dermatologists, so it doesn't have universal appeal, but few sites do. For those who do like their porn up close, then this really hits the mark (crack?).
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
