Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ This should be called Guys Just Wanna Have Fun!
+ Over 1,000 scenes of young and pretty women giving handjobs and teasing for more
+ Some of the newer videos have 4K downloads and most have at least HD downloads
+ Each scene comes with a downloadable picture set
+ A lot of real, authentic, genuine responses from the females
+ Includes the small network Finishes The Job
Cons:
- Kind of makes it clear why guys get tired of masturbating. There really isn’t much you can do with the penis.
- Which is the second con, there’s so much teasing from these young ladies. It’s only a con because we’re paying for action
- The other two sites, Mr POV and the Dick Suckers are not as good even though many of the scenes overlap with Mano Job scenes
Bottom Line:
This should be a fun network if nothing else. It’s mostly young and very pretty women playing with penises. It’s not often the penis gets to take center stage, but does on this site and maybe shows why the penis struggles with the spotlight. There really is only so much a penis can do! It reminds me of why some of us women prefer guys that are growers not show-ers. Watching it grow is part of the fun and arousal.
The ladies on this site do a pretty good job of keeping the penis out of their mouth and or other holes, but there are times, I would have liked to see them do more than play with the penis. I think that’s the biggest con of the site. I can see how and why men would like this type of content. I would guess the guy can picture himself being the guy in the scene. It is why, I assume, the scenes are mostly filmed in POV.
The first thing that crossed my mind was why do we not have lesbian POV where one lesbian plays with the other in closeup detail? These scenes look so fun for the guys and surprise, some of the women seem to be at least somewhat new and inexperienced at playing with the penis. You get real reactions including cute grins when the woman feels the penis getting harder and you see the innocence of the woman quickly turn into horniness. I get the purpose of tease porn, but don’t agree with it. This site and its other two sites are already mixing scenes by having what was clearly a handjob scene turn into a scene for their Dick Suckers site. Thinking while watching porn should be against the law. It is my biggest problem while watching porn. I am, possibly, almost convinced the scenes from this network’s sites are really just edited down from a full scene. For example, you get the handjob part on Manojob. You then have the oral sex on Dick Suckers and finally, Mr. POV is full-out hardcore sex.
I’m not saying this is true. It is just the feeling I get when watching the different scenes from their different sites. It also made me think and wonder if maybe much more happens than makes its way to the porn scene? Is there a female who is great at handjobs, but not as good at oral sex?
The scenes are arousing and fun. From the female viewing perspective, I see myself taking the woman’s place and being as surprised as she is by how aroused the man becomes.
It's a good network as a whole and recommended especially for those who like some tease with their porn.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Echoes the wants of porn afficiandos (women that finish the job)
Encompasses three sites that complement each other: The Dick Suckers, Mano Job and Mr. POV.
Several download options for videos and pictures.
Fantastic selection of models
Sites work seamlessly together.
Good price with email promos.
Cons:
Watching as many scenes as possible to see if one of the men finishes himself.
I think it should update more.
They should be more upfront and transparent about how the sites complement each other.
Bottom Line:
I may just be an overzealous fan who believes this network’s sites work together in a big, convoluted mental process. You have the Dick Suckers, where models suck dicks. You have Mano Job, a handjob and tease site. There’s Mr. POV where hardcore sex happens.
Most (not all) models appear on at least two of the sites and sometimes all three. This explains my belief of these sites being used to complement each other. I start with Mano Job scenes. I then check Dick Suckers and see if the model in the Mano Job scene has a Dick Suckers scene. Hopefully, you’re starting to see why I believe these sites complement each other. Either that, or I need to start joining an Adult dating site instead of a porn site!
The videos are downloadable as are the photos. The only real plot is the woman makes the man cum. It’s a deeper and more complex plot for porn than most of us reallize. For as long as I can remember, late 80s porn, fans and viewers alike have grumbled about the man finishing himself.
I believe the combination of the 3 niches represented by separate sites makes for an unmatched viewing experience. It does take some patience and the frustration of not every model appearing on all three sites, but it’s representative of relationships we all experience. Some of my favorite models on these sites only have scenes on Mano Job and The Dick Suckers. These models remind me of those women we date that aren’t quite ready for sex and try to keep us happy with a handjob and/or blowjob. I may just be reaching for something like a fantasy that these sites have created in my head, but it has kept me joining the site for nearly 2 years straight.
The sites not only complement each other but even the navigation does too. The links are there to click from site to site and there’s an icon telling which site the respective scene is from. The biggest con for me is there’s not enough updates, and saying that – it is also the biggest compliment.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- over 350 scenes
- remastering back catalog
- great customer service. Any issue I've ever had has been fixed promptly and politely by the owner ("Billy"). He interacts with the forms as well and seems to be honest and straightforward.
- New girls and old favorites are shot. Fans can request who'd they'd like to see. I requested Alex Coal and she was posted about 2 months later. (maybe a coincidence?)
- Content is mostly 1920X1080 7.5 Mbps. The new stuff is in 4K (I'm still not on a 4K monitor so I didn't run the specs on it).
- Also get access to thedicksuckers.com and mrpov.com. Some cross-promotion. I caught some Ameature Allure stuff mixed in. But there isn't much of it.
- comment section with an active community
- playlist available along with favorite function for easy organization (also a star system for voting)
- Clean easy search with tags and a search bar
- new scenes pretty much each week
Cons:
PROS Cont:
- Top-of-the-line talent. I'd have a hard time picking favorites but some just a few standouts: Lauren Philips, Alex Coal, Ari Alexander, Cherie DeVille, Kimberly Kane, Larkin Love (she's hard to find outside of her own site!)
- BTS interview. I normally skip it but when I do look at it, it's good. Billy is a good interviewer and sometimes the girls get wild. Wish I could remember who it was but she was getting fucked and being interviewed at the same time. LOL
CONS:
- two-factor authorization (you sometimes need to use a 4 digit code they email to you to log in. I'd say I hit that maybe 1 out of every 10 times I log in)
- rotating content. They pull some videos and re-post them I guess this is aimed at the pirates?
Bottom Line:
It's rare that I keep a long-term membership to a site - but this one has earned its place. I don't think there's any other site doing what manojobs does. It's a niche but they fill it well. For me, I love dirty talk and this site excels at it like no other. While there's a lot of fast-forwarding in any porn shoot. I know I can go to the last 4 minutes of these shoots and find a hot girl talking crazy and taking a facial (normally a few more minutes of talk as cum oozes off her). I find it hot as hell. To me, they set out to accomplish what they're aiming for. This site does not have penetrative content (normally), so watch the previews and make sure they have what you're looking for.
Ok with all that why not the 100? I guess if I were knit-picking I'd say that a site that's been around this long should keep more of its catalog up. I think it's still a good site - but you asked. Other than that it would be nice if they remastered the back stuff faster. But all in all no real complants. If you are looking for a JOE/JOI site I think this is the top of the line.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site I found I have access to with a membership to Finishes the Job. It is a solo male masturbation site.
Despite being an old site this is not a common niche (solo men) and there are close to 50 videos of what I may regret saying -- masculine, straight men masturbating (even more rare, than just male solo masturbation)
The scenes are not long and the quality is not high. You can download all the scenes very quickly.
The quality of the videos isn’t very good in numbers (resolution), but I believe the bitrate for this resolution makes the videos good enough -- barely.
There are pictures, but no way to download them.
No frills navigation, 4 scenes per page, scroll, download, scroll, download.
Quite attractive men for a solo masturbation site. I believe some of these guys have gone on to bigger careers in porn.
Cons:
Each guy’s scene lists his dick size and that’s me shaking my head no. Inflation is a real concern when it comes to money, but these numbers are no way right. One guy is listed as 8” long, 4” wide. He looks maybe average size. Maybe the 4” wide is full-girth? Which would be hard to believe for an 8” long dick. Since that wouldn’t be very round at all.
The pictures would be interesting to download and look at, but no downloads.
Bottom Line:
I had to talk myself into reviewing this site. I was not planning on it until I tested out the different options. Each scene has 12 or more “parts” to download. Those are listed as “midband” which tells how old the site is. It also has a 3 part “broadband” version. Continuing my scrolling there is a full version of the video in midband and broadband. That, to me, justifies a review and me downloading all the scenes.
The broadband version of the full scenes is 480p with 1600 bitrate which makes the videos okay in quality, similar to a tube site. The midband version is 336p. Solo men is the one genre of porn I don’t expect or even want a story. I also don’t want it to last for 20+ minutes. These scenes have no story and most are 10-12 minutes per scene making the file sizes -- when combined with the 480p resolution -- under 200 MB. The site worked very well. The scenes downloaded fast -- almost as fast as I could get the next one started. I know this review won’t interest most of the Porn User members, but do think that’s why a review of a site like this is important. It’s a throw-in site with the Finishes the Job Network which I enjoyed. That makes this site the icing on the cake. The biggest complaint I have with solo men sites is it’s usually easy to tell the scenes are made for gay men. That could be from the effeminate personality of the male that’s masturbating or the male model showing his butthole, playing with his butthole and that does detract for a straight female. These guys may be gay, but they do a very good job of making me believe they are straight men who are masculine. I can count the number of solo male sites that have masculine men on them on my two hands. It’s just not common. This site isn’t that big with 48 videos, but that’s 48 masculine solo men scenes I won’t find on most solo male sites.
The scenes are basic in setup. The guy sits down and masturbates. Scene over. In a lot of ways, I feel like that adds to the masculinity of the male models on the site. These guys act and look like they are just masturbating to finish. Which makes for a highly attractive visual for women that enjoys seeing a man masturbate. Hopefully, some studio will realize the potential in a site like this and give this type of porn another try.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One really great site (Mano Job) and two okay sites.
The network’s navigation is not conducive for counting models. It’s also not easy to count all the scenes. I am getting these numbers: Mano Job has 771 scenes, The Dick Suckers has 192 scenes and Mr. POV has 275 scenes.
The model list works well, where each model is listed with all of her scenes across the 3 sites. It just doesn’t have a way to view all the scenes together across the 3 sites. You have to filter down to the specific site or specific model.
This will be mentioned in the cons too. Most of the scenes I have watched or downloaded have 1080p and there is a filter for 1080p, but as other reviewers have noted there is recycling and when you use the 1080p filter, it gives you results across all 3 sites. This may be the most difficult site to review.
The scenes are enjoyable if you’re into handjobs and pretty and cute models teasing a man, sometimes adding a blowjob and sometimes more.
Cons:
The navigation is getting a lot of mentions. It works well as long as you are trying to find what they want you to find. The tags give you results from all 3 sites. But you can’t view all the scenes from all 3 sites without using the tags.
No dates on updates and based on numbers from previous reviews there’s not only less scenes, there are some new 4K scenes added, which means they have removed even more scenes to recycle.
Finding any kind of consistency. There’s just not any.
Bottom Line:
This site has been recommended to me by multiple PU members. I did not list this in pros, but I was able to also sign into the site No Way Am I Gay and there are a couple of other sites listed under their company’s name that you can also sign into, Chelci Fox is one too. I am not including those in this review. The Finishes the Job site shows 3 sites and those other sites look like they haven’t been updated in at least a decade even though I do like the No Way Am I Gay site. It is solo men masturbating which is my favorite niche, the video quality is just very poor.
Mano Job is the site I was told to try. It is a handjob site and the female models are mostly attractive. I do think some of them were or are well-known. What makes this handjob stand out is it has tags. Are you picking up on what I’m saying? Most handjob sites only have handjobs and wouldn’t need tags. This site adds butt teases, pussy teases, tit fucking (how they list it), jerk off encouragement which I continue to say is as arousing to women as men. They have taken the handjob genre another step and I do like that. There are even parts where the pussy tease slips and becomes vaginal sex for just a few seconds. The number of scenes is where it’s hard to complain, but also is disappointing. The last review by KayTBuffs listed the Mano Job scenes at close to 900. There are now 771 and according to the site’s page you open to it’s being updated daily. Older reviews even listed higher numbers of scenes. They do have 4K scenes, which do look new or newer, but in this case -- that just means there are even more removed scenes. It still does have over 750 scenes with downloadable videos and photos, making it a very large hand job site. The scenes are at least more than just a handjob too.
The site Mr. POV is okay. It’s a decent sized site and if you like POV-style porn you will probably like this site. I don’t see a big appealing factor in it unless the thinking is it’s for those who get tired of the handjobs. These scenes are hardcore sex scenes.
The Dick Suckers is the smallest of the sites and it’s a lot like Mano Jobs except it’s blowjobs instead of handjobs and there’s very little tease. The models are often on all three sites, especially the popular ones I recognize by name.
This takes us to the biggest problem. It’s a network with no way to see all the scenes in one place. It’s more like a hub page that you select a specific site from. It adds a new twist by offering tags. The tags show content from all three sites. If you select the “cumshot” tag, you will get scenes from all three sites. It seems like this is one of those “networks” where less is more maybe applies. If I select the 1080p tag, it gives me all the scenes from all 3 sites that have 1080p downloads. What if I just want the 1080p scenes from Mano Job? This does make it more noticeable that they are recycling. I tried using the 1080p tag. The results delivered rows of videos from all 3 sites. I then filtered to Mano Job with the 1080p filter set. It opened the results, but the 9th video doesn’t have 1080p. It only lets you use one filter at a time and it shows the recycling. The 4K filter shows a good amount of 4K videos with a total of 169 scenes with 4K downloads -- across the 3 sites, but if you filter to any of those sites, those 4K videos do not show up as the newest updates. There are even scenes with 720p maximum download resolution showing up as newer.
I am being fair with the score on a subjective basis. I am only really interested in the Mano Job content and it was my first time trying the site. Recycling is annoying, but I don’t think it applies on your first subscription. I do believe if you have been a member before you may not be as pleased with it as I am.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Point of View site that does the reverse cowgirl POV as good as anyone.
- Good blend of models from stars to ones I've never seen.
- 286 scenes according to my count (see cons and bottom line).
- 146 of the scenes have 1080p, 5 have up to 4K and some of the oldest scenes drop to 480p.
- Photos/screencaps with zip downloads are available.
- Good navigation features and accurate tags.
- Active webmaster that is both helpful and listens to his fans.
Cons:
- It's become clear that there is a certain level of recycle or lost content on the sites on this network.
- As much as I like POV, I do think it gets more repetitive than other hardcore filming styles.
- The oldest scenes here really should be remastered.
- No update schedule or dates on scenes.
Bottom Line:
Mr. POV is the old story of a guy with a camera. They do a better job of POV filming than the average POV site. There's very little bouncing of the camera. Another part they do well with POV that other POV sites fail at is they have the volume at a good, balanced level. A lot of POV sites are very loud due to the camera being in the guy's hand.
They excel most at the reverse cowgirl position, one of the most underrated positions in POV porn. I think this position comes closest to making you feel like you're there. It's a very flattering position for the model (in most cases) and if you've had much reverse cowgirl sex you know you really don't get this good of a view in person.
The models are mostly teen to late 20s. You'll find some stars here like Aaliyah Love and the long-forgotten Bree Olsen, I recognize Allie Addison as a newer model. I don't know that she is that new but she does have a scene here.
I'm not going to completely bomb the score on the review for what is either lost content or removing content and recycling it. Their webmaster is pretty up front about they're a small group. They sometimes don't have new content so they re-release an older favorite. I would like to see them remaster. As for the recycling, which is something I wouldn't say unless I knew it was happening and I felt like it could help others. Those of us that are collectors do look at the numbers to see how much new has been added since our last membership. I've been a member here at least 8 times (since 2015). The 2015 TBP review lists over 300+ scenes. Looking at the content currently there are 17 pages with 16 scenes per page, that's 272 scenes and the 18th page has 14 scenes on it for a total of 286, that's at least 14 less scenes than they had in 2015.
What saves the network and this site too is this is overall a underrepresented niche. Not really the POV but their style of filming, this is porn that is very safe to watch with a woman. It's how I found these sites. One of my exes was really into Manojob and the style of filming they do even on Mr. POV.
It's easy to recommend it to someone that's never been a member or someone that has been a member but didn't keep their downloads. The content they have is very good. If it was me, I would take those old scenes down and start remastering them and put the 720p and up scenes on it.
They're one of those sites/networks that will get some added points for ease of use, good tags, active webmaster, they're trying to make it work and I appreciate that about them.
I would be even happier with Mr POV if they started doing some pussy tease from reverse cowgirl. They do it some on Manojob. It's a good supporting site to the Finishes the Job network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- For me, the best handjob site on the internet (Manojob) with two other so-so sites.
- Good navigation, seamlessly move between the sites.
- Decent blend of models, most are younger and white but there is enough diversity not to count it against them.
- Active and helpful webmaster, didn't have any problems this time but have in the past. Responds fast and is courteous.
- Manojob wins me over with this network especially with the "pussy tease" scenes. That's one of my more recent fetishes and they do it well.
- Rocketgate as the biller is back in pros for now. They made me email to cancel recently but the most recent cancel was automated so maybe it was just a glitch.
Cons:
- It's a tough con to hit them with but there is recycling and I understand why. I will explain in BL.
- Mr POV and The Dick Suckers haven't interested me. Take that more as a compliment towards Manojob.
- Updates are no longer dated, three of the four first listed scenes on Manojob are scenes I already have.
Bottom Line:
My apologies to MarcDC. I had already planned on reviewing this network as it has one of my favorite sites in it, Manojob. I normally wouldn't post a review of the same site as someone else on the same day but I don't think our reviews are that far apart either.
Manojob was the first handjob site I remember joining. Before that I would go to Videobox or some other DVD site and download their handjob DVDs. At first, Manojob didn't do a lot to separate itself from the DVDs but over time they started working the pussy tease in, some call it the cameltoe slide.
Mr. POV is an okay site. Anything in gonzo style these days starts to become repetitive to me. The Dick Suckers same problem. They're average sites if that makes it fair.
In the cons I mentioned that there is recycling. I understand that these guys are a small team. They have times where they're filming and can't knock out brand new updates every other day or even every week so they rotate and older, popular scene in as a new update. I'm not going to take off points for it. I'm familiar enough with this site, their webmaster, that I know he busts his ass trying to get quality content up.
The problem for me is scenes get removed to use as new updates. Rear Admiral reviewed the site in 2015 with 1,400+ scenes, TBP reviewed it in 2017 with 1,307 scenes, I reviewed it in 2017 and there was only 1,266 scenes. I made note that the month I reviewed it in had 31 updates in 30 days. This is one of those situations where the webmaster is a nice enough guy if he would just put everything back up and say he could only get 2-4 updates a month, I think it would look better. We know he's not a major production studio and we appreciate the hard work to keep up.
Still not taking points off for it but as of today, 3/17/2020, there are 1,273 scenes. That's 6 more scenes than when I reviewed it 2.5 years ago.
Manojob is still the best handjob site, tease site, in porn.
The scenes are not as basic as they used to be. They've incorporated JOE or JOI, Jerk Off Encouragement and Jerk Off Instruction. The women don't just kneel down and jerk the guy off like old handjob sites did. They now get naked, half-naked, and grind their bodies against the guy's dick. You'll even get a few slipped in penetrations. Those parts are what puts them ahead of everyone else. I'm not even for sure it's that close.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, 1080p, they also have the cumshot only video, a SD version, a mobile version and interview with each model.
I'm going to tell you the scene to watch to see the eroticism handjob porn can have, Teanna Trump, Class of 2014. They should have paid her 10x what they did and I don't know what they paid her.
The downside as I said the last time I reviewed the whole network is I don't see the other two sites coming close to that type of eroticism. They're doing something very rare with the Manojob content. It makes the other two sites feel very plain.
I'm raising my score quite a bit from the last time I reviewed the whole network. That's because the network as a whole frustrated me the previous time I reviewed it. I was frustrated with the disappearing videos. I'm going as high as I can go for the network just because I don't know how much new content they are putting out. They have around 10 4K scenes according to their tag search. If they keep up the Manojob updates and keep working on that erotic part, maybe I would go a little higher.
It would be my first choice recommendation to someone into tease and handjobs just because of Manojobs. Some people would add more for the other two sites. I have never downloaded anything from either. I have watched a few scenes to see if I thought it was worth a download.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Access to network: manojob.com (hand job site) and Cheici Fox (solo site)Dick Suckers(oral/facial site), MrPOV (hardcore site)
- POV (duh 🙄) pretty standard set up: intro interview, BJ, couple of positition sex, Facial with plenty of dirty talk. I think this family of sites does the BEST job of dirty talk. Just about every video ends in a facial. They then roll camera for another minute or two with the girl looking right into the camera and begging you to pop off too. As a fan of dirty talking, I don't think ANY SITE does a better job then this network
- Consistant theme. Despite that they manage to be rather creative in setups and scenarios. (most involve some idea of meet a nympho)
- "Ok" performer diversity. Casting look like most of porn, but they seem better than most at diversit
- Max quality 1080p (1920X1080). approx 5.2 mbps.
- 4K being rolled out: 4 K format h.264 3840X2160 59.94 fps 29.4 Mbps
- Smaller sizing available
- Model interviews/just pop shot available
Cons:
Pros:
- videos run about 15 minutes.
- Excellent costomer service. I had a day where I was on great broadband so I took advantage to download a bunch. Of course that triggered their piracy alarm. It took a fast email to get me back up and running
- Responsive: I requested they book Alex Coal - a couple of month later there she was! I'm sure they can't always do that, but they tried
- They have great bookings so I'll limit to just a couple of favs: Lauren Phillips, Cherie Deville, Sarah Shevon, Ashley Fires, Larkin Love, Aria Alexander, Alex Coal (in 4K), Jessica Ryan
- STILL UPDATING. Everyday there's an update (sometimes upgrade of old video - most days it's something brand new)
- as of March 16, 2020 over 1,300 videos
- Great organization. You can favorite content, grade content on a 5 point scale, use tag
Cons:
- 4K just started, there aren't many videos available in that quality, yet.
- No PU discout
Bottom Line:
I know it's controversial to throw down a 100 - but I always hated those teachers that said "a 100 is for perfect work and no one is perfect." To me the 100 is for a site accomplishing it's own goals and I think finishes the job perfectly does what it's trying to do.
The network's focus is on hot girls doing great dirty talk. The typical shoot starts with the performer talking to the camera giving a bit of a warm-up (this is not a get to know you interview, this is dirty fun 😊). Next is typically male talent hand job/blow job (if Mr.POV It then moves to penetration sex, good amount of anal content). Lastly- pop shot with followup dirty talk. The previews give a good estimation of the videos inside. Unlike when you go to the movies the previews don't have all the good parts 🤣.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Also includes content from AmateurAllure, ManoJob and MrPOV.
Attractive slutty girls, mostly US models but a few Euro babes.
1080p and 720p videos available (but see cons).
Lots of content with good production, good camera angles in videos, lots of impressive cumshots and facials, with a few creampies.
Can comment on videos, score them out of 5, add to playlists and add favourites.
Variety of download options including model interview and just the cumshot.
Can DL pics though not all are hires as some are screen grabs.
No download limits.
Good navigation - can filter by site, performer or predefined categories.
Can report issues to support on a scene page and support reply is prompt.
Trailers on each scene are useful for choosing what to watch further and/or download.
Can sort scenes by date added, by overall ratings, by my ratings, by my favourites, by alphabetical order, by most viewed.
Model index shows number of scenes for each model and clicking on model shows scene details.
Cons:
Most AmateurAllure content not HD, even very latest content.
No model index filtering other than alphabetical grouping.
Site loading sometimes very slow.
Some scenes missing from model links, e.g. Ivy Winters, Alexis Adams.
Some scenes duplicated, e.g. Amia Moretti, Hydie.
Older content is 640x480.
Poor file naming - only model name and resolution.
Streaming can be very slow/stuttering if more than a few browser tabs open for the site.
Rough edges - some scenes have no streaming preview - pressing preview downloads an FLV file or pressing play DLs the video.
Many clips are not the stated size or as described e.g. supposed 1080 clip is actually remastered 1024x768 or just 640x480 (e.g. Jackie Daniels dicksuckers clip), also clip labelled as 1080 actually 720 with barn doors either side (Jenni Lee scene) so content size is actually 1024x768.
Some very large 1080p file sizes, most are reasonable but a lot are coded at 12Mbps and quite a few at 15Mbps, twice as large as necessary.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after seeing a cumshot compilation vid with quite a few scenes catching my eye and during my membership there was content from thedicksuckers, manojob, mrpov and amateurallure but on visiting the site again it seems amateurallure is no longer included.
TheDickSuckers content is self-explanatory - girls sucking cock until it cums on their face or in their mouth. ManoJob is handjobs ending with a facial or cum in mouth, though a few videos feature some pussy play or even brief penetration before the handjob resumes.
MrPOV is sucking and fucking, ending in a facial or cumshot on body, some scenes end with a creampie. AmateurAllure features girls with great eye makeup sucking and fucking, before ending with cum-in-mouth and swallowing, though I did see a handjob ending and a cum-on-pussy ending.
Both TheDickSuckers and ManoJob content end with the girl giving jerkoff instructions/encouragement, which I thought a bit odd as I woulda expected most guys to have already cum before that part of the vid, but having said that I'm not a big fan of too much dirty talk but I'm sure most other porn watchers love it!
Most of the pornstars are young girls but there are a few older hot ladies milking the cum from the stunt cocks just as well as the young'uns.
There are over 1000 scenes, each between 15 to 40 minutes duration, with TheDickSuckers and ManoJob being mostly 15 to 20 mins and AmateurAllure and MrPOV mostly 20 to 40 mins.
The content is presented as paged thumbnails (which can be filtered by site), with each items showing the site, title, date added, pornstars, categories and average rating. From the thumbnail you can play a trailer and clicking on the thumbnail opens the scene page from where you stream or download the scene, with an options to download a pre-scene interview and just the cumshot, which is useful if you just want to DL the short build-up to the money shot.
You need to sign in with an authorisation code emailed to you when logging in, but this is only required the first time logging in from a particular device/browser, I guess that's to protect your account from unauthorised use so it's not a bad idea.
The site has a few rough edges/annoyances that I've mentioned in the CONS section above, but in addition, there's no filtering on models index other than alphabetical grouping, so you can't select just brunettes, for example, or big tits, etc. The download file naming is pretty poor, only model name and resolution - what would it take to also include the scene name and/or the sub-site name?
Many of the videos are encoded with reasonable bitrates/quality but much of the content is encoded at unnecessarily high bitrates of 12Mbps and up for the 1080 content. I've gone to the trouble of recoding the offending 1080 downloads down to 8Mbps which is more than enough for good quality and overall that saved me 83GB of disk space which is not insignificant.
Although there's content from Manojob, MrPOV and AmateurAllure, I get the impression the content isn't the exact original content from those sites - this was apparent when I downloaded a scene described as being available in 4K, yet when I asked support where was the 4K vid, I was told thay didn't offer it but that it was on the Amateur Allure site. If you try to login to AmateurAllure, Manojob or MrPOV using your TheDickSuckers membership it won't work, as you'd expect.
Furthermore, there's at least one model with videos from both ManoJob and MrPOV out there in the wild, yet her scenes are not available on this site, when I enquired about it, I was told it was upcoming content, which suggests that the content here is somehow syndicated from those actual sites.
There's also a lot of older content remastered from SD to HD and is stated as 1080, but it's actually 1024x768, I guess because the original format would have been 4:3 aspect ratio rather than the 16:9 ratio for HD, but good to see older content being remastered to a larger size.
From the support replies I've received, it seems TheDickSuckers is a one-man band so he's obviously working very hard to keep the show on the road. Any support issues I raised were replied to very quickly.
If you like US pornstars sucking cock and getting fucked, then you'll love this site and the cumshots are very impressive, with only a few less so. The rough edges don't seriously detract from the site and support replies are prompt and honest, so overall I recommend it.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Chelci is young and hot seem like much of this would be at the start of her porn jourey. It really took me down memory lane to some of the 1st sites I joined.
- Good quality at the high point there are videos that are 5.75 mbps and 1920X1080 and 29.97 fps.
- most scenes are solo masturbation
- Bubbly fun personality. She's simtimes interviewed by the camera man. It's fun and enjoyable (and certainly got hot moments too but this has the sweet down home girl vibe to me)
- Pictures sets available (but nothing very interesting)
Cons:
- Old content no longer being updated (on of the links at the top is to her myspace page 😃)
- Only 34 scenes
- most videos are in wmv format with 460X360 formatting. That was good at the time
- NO LONGER UPDATING
- No Zip Downloads for pix
Bottom Line:
Found this site with my Finishesthejob.com membership. It really insn't adversited and looks like it's abandoned. I don't see this Chelsi shooting new content anywhere else. I hope she is retired from the adult world and enjoying herself.
For a throw in site I found some fun stuff here. The quality is dated, so don't expect 4K here. But Chelsi reminds me of the porn I found oline when I was young so was the world wide web (any old timers remember that term? haha)
So starting from the premis that I wasn't expecting this site and I accept that it old footage still sitting on a server - I liked it and I hope the producer doesn't purge it from access. It's fun to watch a young
I'd be pissed if I bought this site thinking I was getting something special. But since I just fell into this site as part of my membership to a network I love. I'm just happy they haven't pulled the plug on it. It's nothing amazing - but it's fun and a trip down memory lane.
I worry that my review might make the owner kill the site. If you are reading this, please don't do that!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Access to network: manojob.com (hand job site) and Cheici Fox (solo site)Dick Suckers(oral/facial site), Finishesthejob.com (umbrella property for all sites)
- POV (duh 🙄) pretty standard set up: intro interview, BJ, couple of positition sex, Facial with plenty of dirty talk. I think this family of sites does the BEST job of dirty talk.
- Consistant theme. Despite that they manage to be rather creative in setups and scenarios. (most involve some idea of meet a nympho)
- Max quality 1080p (1920X1080). approx 5.2 mbps.
- Smaller sizing/streaming available
- Model interviews/just pop shot available
- videos run about 15 minutes.
- great models like Brooklyn Chase, Alexis Tae, AJ Applegate, Zoey Nixon, KAYLEE HILTON (I think her best scenes are on this network)
Cons:
PROS Cont:
- Good model mix; New girls and established stars. MILFS and "barely legal"
- STILL UPDATING (albeit after a hihatis). Updates are typically 2-3/week, seems to be a mix of remastering previously shot and new material. I'm not disappointed by the upgrade in quility from old stuff since there are some real gems there.
- I rarely find a scene that isn't a keeper
- as of December 23, 2019 just over 300 scenes.
- Great organization. You can favorite content, grade content on a 5 point scale, use tags, search. I was able to find my favorite stuff very easily.
- Commenting is also available, but as these things go seems underused by the membership.
- Responsive customer service. I had a day off and was downloading a bunch of stuff while I had good wifi. I hit the anti-piracy cap. A quick email and I was right back to enjoyment. Any time I've reached out to the site I've recieved a quick and courteaus reply.
Bottom Line:
Cons:
- Not a lot of model diversity. Mostly attractive white women
- In fairness there's a good deal of racial diverity and MILF/new comer mix. If you're looking for body type mix there's less of that.
- Use of "daddy" motif. I'm not a fan of the daddy talk. I know that's a thing for some guys but for me it's a turn off. It's not over used. Maybe 1 in 10 of the shoots. I find it more of a distraction than anything else.
Bottom line: Apart from the rather small catelog this site is about as perfect as you can get. I like the POV style. The direction is top notch: you see everything, hear everything, have access to great quality (albeit not 4K - I'm fine with that I haven't upgraded yet). If this network has a secret weapon it's the dirty talk. Not only does each girl do a great job of talking during the action (more than just "oh that feels good; give it to me"), when the scene is done and she's (usually) got her facial the best JOI/JOE in the business come out. I swear every time these girls drive me nuts.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Access to network: manojob.com (hand job site) and MrPOV.com (m/f hardcore), Finishesthejob.com (umbrella property for all sites)
- Oral sex focus. (duh 🙄). With plenty of dirty talk. I think this family of sites does the BEST job of dirty talk.
- Consistant theme. Despite that they manage to be rather creative in setups and scenarios.
- Max quality 1080p (1920X1080). approx 5.2 mbps.
- Smaller sizing/streaming available
- Model interviews/just pop shot available
- videos run about 15 minutes. A little set up (introduction to the talent 2-4 minutes, action, cumshot (almost always a facial), wrap-up (girl talking dirty with her facial still in place)
- Good model mix; New girls and established stars. MILFS and "barely legal"
- Amazing models: Larking Love, Anikka Albrite, Christie Stevens, Zoey Nixon, Brooklyn Chase, Dylan Ryder (boy I miss her!), India Summer
Cons:
PROS CON:
- Updates are about once a week, seems to be a 50/50 split of remastering previously shot and new material. I'm not disappointed by the upgrade in quility from old stuff since there are some real gems there
- Great organization. You can favorite content, grade content on a 5 point scale, use tags, search. I was able to find my favorite stuff very easily.
- Commenting is also available, but as these things go seems underused by the membership.
- Responsive customer service. I had a day off and was downloading a bunch of stuff while I had good wifi. I hit the anti-piracy cap. A quick email and I was right back to enjoyment. Any time I've reached out to the site I've recieved a quick and courteaus reply.
CONS:
- About 175 videos as of December 12, 2019
- Not a lot of model diversity. Mostly attractive white women (some racial diversity, some body type diversity, but like most porn it's a little rare.)
Bottom Line:
CONS:
- Not much bad to say. I'm very happy. I'd like to see more of a discout for long term membership, but boy am I streching when I list that as a complaint.
Bottom Line:
After being dormant for a while the site owner has refocused on this property and it shows.
I've always been a fan of the director, Billy. He worked for DogFart.com for a long time and I think he brings out the best in the models he works with. I'll see a girl somewhere else and then see the performace that he encourages and it can be night and day.
I'm a little disappointed in only ~175 videos with as many years that they've been around. But reading the owner's blog it clear that was the result of being at Dogfart.com, now he's focused here and I for one am delighted.
I give this one a solid buy. If you like seeing oral and like dirty talk this site is perfect. For me I'm all about the dirty talk so I couldn't be happier. I've beena member for about 4-5 months, and as long as Billy keeps his focus here, I'll proably stick around for a year or more.
Females are mostly young, but there are chubbier models, slimmer models and various races.
Cons:
The other reviews I've read said they are recycling content. I didn't know what that meant. I'm not for sure they are. One of the newest scenes is of Allie Addison. I saw her on ALS Scan and they were saying it's her first year in porn. Some might be recycled or they may have removed some, but for this niche this is a lot of content.
I was frustrated with Rocketgate which caused the problem I had to contact the site's customer service about.
Bottom Line:
This is your standard handjob site, but there is a lot more going on here. Some of the models get on top of the guy and tease their vagina against the male's penis. Some slide the guy's penis up and down between their butt cheeks. Others stick the penis between their boobs and some turn into oral and oral teasing.
The more advanced scenes seem to be over the last 3-4 years. Maybe people/fans complained that the handjob action was getting repetitive. The different types of scenes really makes this site excellent.
The models are all in the better looking to very pretty group. That is not common in this niche.
The sites that come with blend in too. Mr. POV is POV sex, if you get tired of watching handjobs you can watch sex from the perspective of the camera. The other is The Dick Suckers. It's a lot like Mano Job except you're going to see oral in every scene. The sites combined have around 1,400 scenes total.
I like it a lot. There is a good amount of focus on the man and his enjoyment. The models all look to be having fun and the scenes with more than just a handjob are better than hardcore sex scenes for me.
The download options are unique. You can download on 1080p, 720p, Web Version, Mobile Version, Cumshot only or Exclusive Interview. You can also stream another option -- the slo-mo cumshot. You can make a playlist with your favorite scenes in it so they play in a row. You can favorite your favorite models.
The site is simple to use. It has a dropdown box to change the site you are viewing. The model index can be viewed in alphabetical order and when you click on a model it shows you all of her scenes on each of their sites.
The models are usually in skimpy clothing, but some wear regular looking outfits, some are topless in the scenes, some are fully nude, it kind of is the pattern on this site. They are covering a lot of bases.
They do tag most of their scenes as J.O.E. sometimes tagged on other sites as J.O.I. J.O.E is jerk off encouragement. I haven't seen any scenes with insults from the women. That is a plus for me. I like to see both people enjoying themselves not one belittling the other.
This will go into my very short list of favorite sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best handjob site on the internet and it's not even close.
- Has network access with it, but I scored this site 9 points higher than the network, it's a miring network that takes away from this site.
- Unlike the rest of the network, Mano Job is updating with new content and isn't recycling.
- An unheard of, unmatched, roughly 800 handjob videos.
- Some well-known models and some that I probably just don't know by names.
- Probably internet porn's best tagging system. Will go more into this in BL.
- They experiment with niches by adding CFNM elements to some scenes, and using the various actions that are well-tagged and easy to find.
- Very good download speeds.
- Excellent technical quality on this site with over 700 of those videos having 1080p option. Also pictures with zips if interested in those.
Cons:
- Is it fair to say the network it's on? The main two other sites in the network are recycling, which causes me to think the whole network is recycling. When on the network's hub, you get a mix from the 3 sites so it takes away from the Mano Job content.
- I think its price is a little high, it's fairly unique content and they do it better than anyone, but it's $30.
- There's still a listed but undefined download limit. I really don't believe it's there.
- Really the only real con is the common one. It's a niche site and all scenes are fairly similar, it can and does become boring.
Bottom Line:
I have only scored a site from a network, higher than its network, one time before this. Think it was Nubiles.net. I actually think in this case it's a big difference. The network this site is on has around 1,300 scenes. A little over 800 of those scenes are on this site, Mano Job. I've been told, "You don't have to go to the other sites", it's not the point. If you sell me something as a network, then I have expectations. Because I brought up some rather negative points about the network, I thought it was only right and fair for me to come back and post something more positive about this site. One more part on this, the site Chelci Fox, which isn't advertised as included, but is included as you find out later in your membership, is now fixed and operational. Good job by them to update the certificate or whatever it was that was causing a problem. There's a full explanation in the comment section on that problem.
I think the first big question here is "is Mano Job recycling?" My instinct tells me no. They're updating quite a bit, I think 16 out of the 19 days of December, so far, but these scenes look new. I hate that I'm not as caught up on the current models, but will say one of the December updates if of Roxy Deville, who I do know is retired. It could be something they recorded before she retired and are just now getting around to releasing. Most of the rest of the models aren't familiar to me.
Why would I make such a bold claim as "the best handjob site"? Simple. Handjob sites are notorious for having repeat models, not just a few or the not intended pun of a handful of times, but many handjob sites have about 12-15 women who they use for 100 scenes. I still believe this site is somehow related to Fucked Hard 18 and the models here are very comparable to the models on Fucked Hard 18. Young, some curvy, different races and nearly all are attractive. Which is something you'll also have trouble finding on handjob sites. So, that's part of my reasoning behind "the best".
Then there's the amount of content. There are handjob "networks" that don't have half the amount of content this site has. The oldest scene is from December 2005, so they've been around a long time even though they didn't update much back then...
Which does make me question the recycling possibility. But if they are recycling some old scenes, they are doing so in remastered 1080p.
The tagging system deserves its own section. Handjobs are fairly basic. But as the genre once grew into a popular one, it stopped being the common handjob. Things like Tit-fucking were added. Pussy Tease was added. Butt Tease was added. The out of control, breaking the rules, Oral option was added. The tags might not be 100% right, but they are pretty accurate. I think in a handjob genre, those little tagged niches are very important. It kind of reminds me of lesbian sites that tag every action in a scene, which is a great help. I get tired of watching videos looking for one certain action only to not see it.
And those combined reasons make it the best handjob site.
I think as porn viewers and users (same thing?) get more and more used to common cookie-cutter porn scenes, they'll start looking into handjobs, CFNM, since I'm pretty sure that's what happened to me.
The one part that might surprise potential members are the pictures. Again, the thought going into this content is very good. I really didn't think I would care anything about pictures from a handjob site, but at least 1/3 of the pictures (in downloadable zips) are just of the model before the handjob, teasing, in her regular clothes and that actually adds to the content.
Seeing that the vast majority of the content is available in 1080p helps for those into the technical aspects. The videos also have the 720p option and "web" and "mobile" versions. They also do have a "cumshot" option in the videos. This site, in and of itself is impressive.
I have very little to say about the other sites in the network. You might find something you like on them, but I didn't. The Chelci Fox one has some interesting content that does look fairly old (maybe 2005-2010 era?), but is typical solo girl-type content.
I also think this is a good example of a question that has been asked here on PU. The price does hurt the score. Based on the standards that are used in grading a site, it's very close to a 100, by itself, it does everything it says and they have evolved it with new situations and actions, but the price and inclusion in a network that's not very good, brings the score down a little. I'm doing math there and thinking if it wasn't sold as a network, the price would be cheaper for this one site.
If you're looking for handjob content this is really the only site you need to join. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn, this would be a good alternative to try. Most of the big name models I know of, are on here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a network that's not really a network that has one of the internet's top handjob sites in it.
- Includes 3 sites, Mano Job, The Dick Suckers (really, people?) and Mr POV. At least we know they're not using their creative juices for site names. There's also bonus scenes from Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
- Download speeds are good, 75% of my max.
- Most scenes include pictures and they are downloadable. There's also various options on the videos including "bra busting" clip and "cumshot only".
- Navigation is excellent. Well, kind of, it will make more sense as you read through.
- Mano Job has been around for 10+ years. It was the first handjob site I saw that used the "pussy tease", a very important part for me.
- Rocketgate as biller, I've had no problems with them, but do get annoyed by them remembering me and trying to use my sign-up information from 2012. Cards expire!
- No real ads, some live cams from within the site, no cross-sales.
Cons:
- I'm going to get this one out of the way. Handjob porn isn't for everyone and I'll explain in the BL what it is that I like about it and even for me, it gets very repetitive.
- The damning one, though it's not hurting my score since there's still a lot of content here. They're recycling content and my guess is they have been for awhile. I think some of it might be remastered when they recycle it, but one of the newest scenes is of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. There will be more in the bottom line.
- Supposed download limit, I tested it as good as I could, downloaded 76 GB in 7 hours, didn't hit a limit, so this isn't so much a con as it is a reminded that they do say they have a download limit.
Bottom Line:
Why would I call a network, a network that's not really a network? Because I was a member of Mano Job way back in 2010 and it included The Dick Suckers and Mr. POV. Finishes the Job is nothing more than a hub that brings all the content of those three sites together. It did wonders for the navigation, but this is pretty much the same thing as joining Mano Job and getting the other two sites with it. I don't know, maybe that's a little questionable since Finishes the Job before signing up looks like another full site to go along with those other three.
What's not questionable is the content count. I was shocked when I first opened the site. They have 31 updates in November 2017, that's more than 1 per day. I hadn't realized Finishes the Job even exists. I was just looking at Mano Job as a join to get some old content I no longer have. This really isn't a negative review as the score shows, but I'm going to show the numbers:
RearAdmiral reviewed this site in 2015 and listed 1,400+ scenes.
Mbaya reviewed this site in 2016 and listed 1,452 scenes.
Xander of TBP reviewed this site in March of 2017 and there was 1,308 scenes.
Here I am in late November 2017, a month that has seen 31 updates in 21 days and the total is 1,266.
Ahem.
Maybe things are a little questionable. I know one scene is recycled, it's one of the newest updates and it's of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. I'm guessing these sites are also owned by the people who own Fucked Hard 18 and maybe even Amateur Allure too. There's a phantom site Finishes the Job and 200 less scenes than 2015, but I still think it's a very good site.
The navigation is very simple. They've combined the content into one area. Four rows of four scenes per page, 79 pages. Over on the left toolbar you can pick to just see Mano Job site scenes or any of the other sites, including Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
Handjob porn appealed to me back 10 years ago or so. I saw a handjob scene with Brianna Beach in it. She was already one of the best, most believable porn stars, but that scene pushed her over the top. The enjoyment she showed, the arousal she had, it was bad enough that she was asking for the scene to be a sex scene because she was so turned on. That's what handjob porn offers me. You can watch half or more of these scenes and the models look downright bored. Some even look like they're watching a television off the screen. The other models, they look more aroused and more excited than in even their hardcore scenes.
Mano Job does a good job of this. As mentioned, they were the first to do the pussy tease handjob and it's always fun to watch those because it teases many of the female models more than it is the male. That's very rare in porn. The woman being teased.
It's not going to be possible to say when they started releasing 1080p videos since they're recycling, but I would estimate at least half of the scenes have 1080p, don't hold me to that, but I've went back halfway through the pages and there's still a 1080p option.
That excellent navigation might hurt them even more. It's making it easy to see that they are cram-updating. I remember other sites doing this back a few years ago, they would remove 100 and release them over a month as new.
I still can't help but laugh over the names of the sites, did somebody really say, "The Dick Suckers"? Mano Job is the "star" here and the main draw. There's been mixed reports on the DL limit, Xander mentions in his TBP review that there's no DL Limit, but it does show up in their TOS, it just isn't active from the best I can tell.
Look at this as an archive site. The content is good, even if it's repetitive. Good quality, excellent navigation, little to no ads, no cross sales, it's hard to be too hard on them as being dishonest when they're not taking advantage of multiple cross sales and dozens of ads. If I was going to offer advice it would be to put all the content back on it and just let the content sell itself. Nearly all handjob and CFNM sites have gone under.
And that's how I will recommend it, for those who like handjob content or POV content, I don't particularly care for Mr POV or The Dick Suckers, but the content is typical on those sites. Even though I would recommend it to those who like handjob content, I will only do so on a one-month basis. I won't be back after this month. Which I think is sort of a strength for an archive site. You can get everything you want in a month and know there's no more new content coming out. Last, as far as I can tell, this is exclusive content, but I want to mention again the bonus site content, specifically Fucked Hard 18, the blue room that's used in nearly every Fucked Hard 18 scene is also used occasionally on Mano Job.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bills through CCBill and Epoch. However the default is Rocketpay. I used it and had no problems.
-Discount available on Rabbits, but not on PU.
-Huge archive with 1452 videos and a photoset for each video. Most are zip downloadable.
-Many very attractive well known porn models. You can find Kelly Wells, Darcy Tyler, Jodi Taylor, Riley Reid, Ana Foxx and Cindy Starfall, just to name a few.
-The ability to stream as well as download just the cum shot, as well as only an interview.
-Irregular updates, but frequent enough. July had 21 and there were 19 each for June and May.
-Has some ethnic variety with Latinas and some Ebony models, but needs more Asians.
-No download limits as I tried my best to test the site.
Cons:
-Many models, maybe most, have tattoos.
-File name duplications if the model has more than one scene.
-Many videos have over saturated color.
-Many videos are remastered older scenes. There is only so much you can do to improve by remastering. What you get are small videos that dont look sharp, despite the HD specs.
-The most recent videos are described as 1920x1080. I found the one for July 31st at 1024x768, 5465kbps. The one for August 1st is a mere 320x240. I suspect this is recycled as no one would shoot a scene now with that low resolution.
Bottom Line:
The premise of the site is that the male model never finishes himself, only the female does. Further, the male stunt cock is never intrusive. Most of the time he does not speak and never shows his face. To further enhance the heat in the scene, most if not all videos have JOE, which is jerk off encouragement. This can be hot, but some models just dont have that something extra when they talk dirty. My best guess is that it works in maybe half the scenes.
There are three websites in the network: Mano Job, Mr. Pov, and The Dick Suckers. Nearly every cumshot is either on the face or in her mouth. Mano is a hand job site, Mr. POV is all kinds of sex in one scene, focusing mostly on oral and vaginal and The Dick Suckers is obviously BJs.
Most videos focus on POV style, which unfortunately is not to my taste. We here at PU have discussed POV many times, and I am one of those in the majority who dont care for it. I would like more whole body shots. Also, unfortunately far too many models have tattoos. Too many videos are over saturated. To add another negative, there is a big problem with low quality videos. Most are remastered older videos that were not shot originally in HD. What you end up with are videos that are too small and not very sharp. While watchable, I look for better in 2016. I also feel deceived by advertising recent videos as HD 1920x1080 and then not delivering. The most recent two were NOT HD and one was 320x240. HUH? As far as remastering, I found it very interesting that the present video count is 1452 and in Rearadmiral's review he mentioned there were 1400+. In the last 16 months how many new updates were really added?
Photos are small by todays standards at 1500x1000. I would never join for the photos available here.
There are many well known porn stars that are quite attractive and are fun to watch here. Another plus is that the archive is huge with 1452 videos that are updated about 20 days a month. But, I have serious reservations as to what exactly has been added.
For me the bottom line here is that despite its pluses, many of the videos just dont work for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 1400+ scenes in an under-served niche
- Updates daily
- Lots of A-list models
- Good ability to sort scenes
- Downloads and streaming available
- Photos are available
Cons:
- Download speeds range from average to abysmal but tend to be lower than average
- Download managers are a little problematic
- Scene resolution is lower than average
Bottom Line:
I suspect that most porn buyers are like me and wish that this niche didnt need to exist. But in a world where so many porn money shots are the guy jerking off on the girl this site is needed. The whole premise of the site is that the girls finish the guys off in every scene. (Thats the premise, but there are scenes where the usual happens.)
Ill start with what this site does well its good porn. The scenes feature top porn models and the scenes are all fairly hot and fun to watch. And there aren't many jerk-off sessions either most of these girls do finish the job.
This site is really made up of three distinct sub-sites: Mano Job, which features handjobs, The Dick Suckers, which features blowjobs, and Mr. POV which features hardcore b/g sex. Its a great idea to break the scenes down into those sub-genres because many people may prefer one niche over the others. I find handjobs boring to watch, for example, so I could filter those out if I wanted to.
The site currently has 1400+ scenes available with a new one added every day, making it a good value. In case anyone is interested, Mano Job has 850+ scenes, The Dick Sucker has 300+ scenes and Mr. POV has 280+ scenes.)
The volume of great porn is enough for me to recommend the site, but to allow prospective members to make an informed decision you should know that the site has some flaws. These are, in no particular order:
The download speeds vary wildly. I could download a scene and see 15MB/s and then download immediately after and see less than 1MB/s. I could understand if I was downloading at peak times and consistently got slow speeds but that wasnt the case. I tried different times and would get different speeds regularly. Most downloads came in at the slower end of things at about 2MB/s. In my opinion, the download speeds are the greatest flaw here. While I could hit average speeds, in most cases the downloads were well below average speeds expected in 2015.
Scene quality varied. The scenes had multiple download options but most offered 1080p. The 1080p quality wasnt consistent: on some scenes it was true 1080 and on others it was lower.
Video quality isn't the best. Im not a tech guy but most of the scenes were a little fuzzy with some pixilation and this is with downloading the best resolution available. I also found that there was a narrow band at the bottom of many of the scenes that was badly pixilated.
Download managers are supported but may cause issues. Id normally queue up scenes but since the site doesnt allow downloads to be stopped and resume I played it safe and downloaded individually.
Scene resolution varies too, but some of that is to be expected since the site has been around for 10 years. Most of the newer scenes are good with 1920x1080 at 6200kb/s and 1280x720 at 2800kb/s being common. Some scenes are lower at 1024x768 at 2500kb/s. There are even some really low resolution scene tossed into the mix but thankfully these seem rare. These are 320x240. Some older scenes are remastered and uploaded as a new scene. While I dont have a problem with that, these remastered scenes are often fuzzy and pixilated. A problem that the site seems to have is the bitrate they use which is only half of that used by many other sites. I suspect the low bitrate is the culprit for the reduced quality. The file types aren't listed but I always chose one of the two best resolutions depending on file size and those were all in MP4 format.
Streaming is also available in multiple resolutions.
The site also offers some interesting options: apart from the full scene you could stream or download just the money shot (sometimes also offered in slow-motion) and an interview with the model.
The site has a list of tags for all the common niches so its easy to sort for anything youre looking for. You can also sort by models.
Photos are also available, as singles or as a zip. The photos are 1500x1000 which wont impress any serious collector, but it is fair to say that this is more of a video site than a photo site.
The TBP review says the Terms of Reference mentions a download limit but doesnt put a number on it. I cant confirm this, but if there is a limit it has to be fairly high. I downloaded close to 50GB in one day trying to find the limit but was never locked out or prevented from downloading.
Overall I still recommend the site because the good outweighs the bad. This is an under-served niche (which only shows how crappy a lot of porn is these days) and has more than 1400 scenes available on a well-organized site. The download speeds are well below average and the resolution quality could be better, but the site is worth checking out if you can put up with those flaws. I cant however, give it my highest rating which is to say that this is a site Ill rejoin. I dont regret joining once, but the speeds and video quality issues are enough to make it unlikely that Ill rejoin.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Great direction. Iv'e seen many of these girls on other sites and their best work is always here.
- Male talent stays out of the way so it's more about the girl's performance. (nothing is worse than male talent trying to make it about him)
- 1920X1080 about 5.5 mbps.
- good combination of established stars and up and
comers. You never know who you will see next.
- clean organization; chronological and by favorite star.
- Network: you also get manojob.com and mrpov.
- Huge catalog with over 500 videos.
- stream through .flv, or download in wmv or mp4
- updates 1/week
- back catalog stretches back to 2005
- great dirty talkin' (my favorite part of porn)
Cons:
- A few sites deviate from all oral; but like the name says: it's just dick sucking
- $30/month is a little pricey (but I can't at all argue with the quality)
- can't do a keyword search "redheads" for example
- no zip downloads for pix
Bottom Line:
I really like this site. It's one of my all time favorite. I think their production value and attention to detail is topped only by kink.com. TDS has great audio and lighting so you hear the girl playing with herself during the performance. It's some of the hottest content on the net.
I wish they had some more aggressive pricing; but like is often noted in the PU formum, porn is under increased competition - so I understand the position they're in. Like I said above you get a very polished product for your dollar. I was satisfied :)
The site is packaged with manojob (a handjob site) and mr. pov. These are a good mix cause they round out the mainstream porn content. If I were to offer any expansion I would say to add an all anal site - but maybe that's just shooting for the moon.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of content. A lot of stars on here as well as new girls and a lot you haven't heard of. All in all a very good variety.
- Site listens to whom the fans want. They've had multiple girls back because members of the sites have requested it. They listen.
- Shot in high quality.
- The girls get into the scenes, and they are the focus. No camera man egging her on, but the girl and "you" since there's POV here.
- Access to other websites comes with membership.
- Constant updates keeps it fresh.
Cons:
- While it does what it does well, some people might like more variety in their scenes.
Bottom Line:
I've enjoyed my membership to all three sites, but purchased through this one. I like the fact that girls are talking dirty to you and there is fresh, new content on a weekly basis. Throw in the fact that the owner of the sites listen to fans and it's a winner for me. Getting the bonus sites as well is a nice touch and helps you with the variety talked about before. Check it out, I'm sure you'll like it.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- A ton of videos. The lead page says over 250 but I think it's more than that. I usually like to download as much as I can for future viewing, but this overwhelmed me.
- Videos are HD and Mac friendly.
- New girls and old favorites are shot. Fans can request who'd they'd like to see.
- Director doesn't over comment so you're not distracted.
- Filthy talk. I'm a big fan of dirty talk and the director must coach the talent ahead of time because it really is outstanding.
- Also get access to thedicksuckers.com and mrpov.com.
- Regular updates. (Approx. one a week)
- Mix of POV and camera man shootings (no tripod in use here).
Cons:
- Back catalog is not HD
- I think the organization could use some work, better use of tagging for example. The chronological and star search is good but sometimes your looking for a girls with a southern accent for example. It would be cool if you had more flexibility
- Site is formulaic then again you know that going in.
- Doesn't have the social networking integration that's common at this point in time. Maybe that will come in the future. The admin does have a blog/twitter/youtube but that's more about him (and quite funny) and not as much about engaging with the talent.
- There's no live show (ala naughty america for example) - something like that could really be fun on a site like this.
Bottom Line:
I really like this site. It is a bit expensive, but you do get great quality for that price. It would be nice it they found some partners to expand their network.
I think this site's preview page is the gold standard. It gives you a clear understanding of what they're about, you are not surprised once you have joined. The show you how often they update and you can go back and look at years worth of shoots to see who they've shot and how good the shoots were. Each preview is about a minute and a half to two minutes in length. I think this is fair. It gives you a good since of what you'll see without the producer giving away the farm (this is a business after all).
I like this site (as you can tell with the excellent rating) and I'm sure I'll go back to them in the future (right now I'm on an amateur kick - but I'm sure that will come to an end).
As I looked it up today I see they're listing a 3rd site as part of their network (I never made it to it when I was a member, I was too busy with all the content on Manojob!), but now that link is dead so that's a little disappointing.
Bottom line. What you see is what you get and I think what you see is gold. If you like pretty girls talking dirty and taking facials this is a great site - in fact, I don't know of a better one!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Bonus access to 3 other sites
- All exclusive content
- Quality of video and pics is consistent and all full-scene. The site is new so you will not find small unwatchable older stuff.
- No DRM or apparent download limits
Cons:
- A single scene is split into 3 parts with 2 days between updates
- No zips for photo
- Navigation is pretty bad
- This site is a little overpriced at almost $30.
- Too many long interviews
- All videos have the same file name 01.wmv
- Lack of choice in video format. Only wmv and flv downloads.
- I expect HD video on a new site
Bottom Line:
Mr POV is new sister site of Mano Job and The Dick Suckers. It has a similar style but this site actually has full-on vaginal sex. You might not known it's part of the network because they don't make it obvious or easy get to the bonus sites. Anyway the models are all porn stars, but none of them are the worn-out looking type. They are attractive, but I didn't see anything but white girls and I think they were all fairly young(no MILFs), so there's not much variety. As the name suggests the action is shot POV style. IMHO that doesn't always provide the best angles and can be repetitive, but some people appreciate not having the male talent in the way on screen.
The are 78 scenes but actually only 26 models. They release 3 videos in a row of a girl and each one counts as an update. The first scene, which they put on Monday is a naked interview; nothing special. The Wednesday update is the girl engaged in POV sex with Mr. POV himself. Finally there is another POV video of the girl on Friday, this with a different guy. I feel this is not the best way to run the site. They don't need to give us 3 updates in a row of the same girl. They can do one POV scene with the girl at a time and then don't give us the other until at least a few weeks later. The interview video can be cut out or a be smaller part of a girl's first scene. Interviews are okay, but keep them short and I don't care what movies she likes. They did a 40 minute interview with Dylan Ryder for crying out loud! What is this, Meet The Press? No of course not, on Meet The Press you typically only have to answer question for half as long.
Joining gets you access to Mano Job,The Dick Suckers and Chelci Fox. Like the sites I mentioned, Mr POV suffers from poor navigation. They spread the content out on too many pages, they don't have a model list and the search is mediocre.. They also have the extra videos of slow motion cumshots that Mano Job has, but I honestly never bothered to watch one.
Photo updates are different from the video updates. On the day the interview is released they put out 3 solo photosets too. The next two hardcore updates have both vidcaps and action stills. So that's around 130 actual photosets if my math is right. All photos are 1000x1500, but they do not offer zip files of the photos. Too bad because I liked the photography but don't like to waste my time downloading 1 pic at a time.
The video quality ranges from 640x480 1500kbps to 720x480or 800x600 2000kbps. I expect 1280x720 or better on a new site like this. You can only choose between wmv and flv. You can watch in the browser or download both types.
Not a bad site, so if you're looking for exclusively POV videos then this is your site. You do get the other sites and the content is all exclusive, but there are bigger networks that are cheaper. It might be worth it if they had crisp HD videos, zip photo downloads,and different updates. I rate this an average site and might recommend it if you're into POV.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Well Produced Scenes
Stays On Topic
Hi Res Photos
Large Archive
Interactive Forum
Good Extra Site
Screen Caps
Exclusive Material
NO DRM
Cons:
No Zip Files :(
Older Scenes/Less Appealing
Hassle To Enter Extra Site
Could Be Updated More Frequently
Needs Improved Navigation
Bottom Line:
This is the best HJ site out there, mostly because they do it right. It stays on topic and doesn't stray from the niche, which a lot of niche sites do, to my great annoyance. The producer and director here make a real effort to do it right. They are aware of one of the real problems in western porn, especially with niches like this: the "stunt dicks" (their term!) often ruin scenes in niches like this. We don't want to see the male props giving themselves handjobs! This site tries their best to avoid this spectacle, although sometimes it's a losing battle, through no fault of their own. And---importantly---they understand that the viewer does not desire to hear the director talking. You don't get that here, and high marks to them for that. You can discuss these and other issues with them in their forum. All sites should have a forum.
The videos are 640x480 (wmv). As of this writing, there are 297 of them. They are well produced. You can download them whole, in small parts, or in very small parts. Each scene also includes a slow motion climax, and a behind the scenes video. The oldest videos have some not very appealing girls in them, but generally the latest updates are just fine. You get screencaps with every scene.
The photos are 1500px, and very well photographed. However---no zip files! Come on guys, get those zip files up! Photos are not a side attraction, lots of us like them better than the vids. No excuse for not having zip files in this day and age.
There are 2 extra sites, the "Dicksuckers" being tha main attraction. It isn't real easy getting there though, and you have to sign in again when you do. That should be fixed. But it also is a good site, and mirrors Mano technically, with a lot of the same girls (obviously they do 2 separate scenes for the site).
You can bookmark your favorite scenes, which is handy (all sites should have this feature), but the site's navigation needs some work. Could be more user friendly and attractive, they have a model listing that is a bit of a mess.
I like niches like HJ/BJ, and when it's done properly (as this site is) it's unique in the online porn world. The site gets a high mark primarily for not disappointing in this regard, and for the fact they make a conscious effort to please the paying customer. And it's apparent that the site keeps improving. Hand Job niche lovers will not be disappointed.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+Videos are HQ 640x480
+Two download qualities available, and scenes available in full or split-scene
+Site search, works well
+Movies come with associated HQ image set and screencaps, 100+ images in each.
+When viewing images you have the age old next/previous/gallery controls
+Haha, they provide short clips of the cumshot in slow motion. Hilarious. The one with newbie Amia Moretti is splatterific.
+Associated forum. But stupid thing requires secondary login, though.
+Long description of each movie seems like it comes genuinely from the girl, but I have a hard time believing it.
+*APPLAUSE* Every scene, from the most recent to the earliest, is available in the same high quality format. I can't say that older videos were ever poorer quality, but its good to know that everything is standardized, something many other sites have failed to do with their OWN PRODUCED VIDEOS WHICH THEY HAVE THE SOURCE!
+100% exclusive content
Cons:
-Watermarked videos
-Poor update schedule - 1 update/wk. I can't determine the update schedule on ChelciFox because videos aren't date-tagged, but TheDickSuckers is date tagged, and it too is 1 per wk, so update schedule is more like 2 per wk.
-Poor organization. So they apparently are at v2 of their layout, but v2 is no better than v1. 5 updates per page, 49 pages...are you kidding? They really need a gallery page - 5 columns, 10 rows, 1 page. Not hard at all.
-No ZIP downloads for picture galleries
-You get access to TheDickSuckers and ChelciFox but you would never know because they do not advertise it well. And the links are not auto-login, you have to login again.
-Login process includes image verification
-Generic file names (01.wmv)
-Lower quality download is non-natural 448x336 resolution. 480x360 is a better choice in my opinion.
-Expensive $30/mo
Bottom Line:
Overall, it is a decent network of sites but it is nothing to get excited over. Both of the network sites (that arent ChelciFox.com) are dedicated to girls performing POV-style on a guy's hardware. It works for a little while, but it gets tired fast. Some of the vids involve sex of some sort (watch the Amia Moretti scene, she tells the guy behind the camera that she is going to FUCK HIM and tells him NOT to fuck her...very hot), but again, POV-style...works for a bit, but gets tired fast.
The organization is piss-poor terrible. 5 updates per page, with a shitload of text and all download links. It makes a verrrrrrry long page, lots of scrolling. 5 per page, 49 pages...what a waste. They need to look at sites like AdultRealityPass, or Brazzers, or NaughtyAmerica or any SANE porn site...hell, just take a look at Google Images. EMPLOY A GALLERY!!! Yes, it will make your archive look smaller, but it will at least make it easier to find and enjoy content. 5x49 = 245 videos (approximate)...if you make it 5 rows and 5 columns you get 25 updates per page, 10 pages - not all that hard, and 10 pages is still a lot of updates. When I use ManoJob (and the network site TheDickSuckers) I feel like I'm browsing one of those poorly made sites on the AdultBouncer or DeluxePass network...yuck.
The quality of the material is good, but the lack of ZIP downloads, lack of a good update schedule and the lack of decent organization are big deal breakers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site is for fans of tugjobs, handjobs or whatever. And one of the best in it's field.
The amount of videos here are just great - and what you can expect from a "good" site.
Almost 300 videos of (mostly) fine tugjobs - with very different kinds of girls - some quite plain, though.
Some top-porn models included.
Fine video-producing with the GIRL in the front - no f....... cameraman-yap.
Fine bj-bonus site - and one more - not so exiting - bonus site.
Fine - for most videos - quality.
Download speed ok.
Average updates - what seems to be every third day - not impressive, though.
Fine preview - go for that, first - then you get the idea...
Cons:
Misserable navigation - and ditto socalled "search-engine"
One of those site where you just have to keep on pressing the bottum going through the archives.
Some stereotype-style of filming (but generally it's better than average)
Price a bit high.
Too few euro-models - but ok, this is first and last a US-oriented site, so now you know...
Annoying file-names - all have the same, so you got to alter everything after download.
Bottom Line:
Take a look at TBP and the handjob-sites, tugsites and whatever they're called. No more than a 81,5 for the top-rated one.
As somewhat a fan of those hj-sites, I think I've been through them all - untill now Her Sweet Hand was the best.
But ManoJob got a lot more. You get to know the model without any stupid talk from the cameraman, the girls are well guided/edited in the manner of speaking, teasing og talking directly to the viewer.
And that part is very well done here at ManoJob.
It's a pleasure to watch those US-girls talking to the viewer, only - and if you're into sexy-talk, this could be the site for you.
And here is why this site deserves above the 80: Well produced videos with girls remembering that the thing here is like: POV.
And another pros. is the tremendous amount of videos and ditto different types of girls - AND before you get to the hj-act most girls do fine teasing, masturbating and so on - pretty good, all together.
Very fine dealing with the video-files:
You can download every scene in small parts (wmv) or download the scene in three part - and, of course full scene. Typical size for an entire scene is 180-240 Mb.
And finally you can choose to download cumshots only.
But Man: Name those files better for the user to archive downloads - and not name all the files the same.
Photosets: Download vidcaps or fullsize jpegs (1500x1000) not bad.
Bottom line: This is a fine - at the moment maybe the best - handjob site around - if you can do without euro-models - they have a few at ManoJob - no, very few...
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
