Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Updated:
03-09-1902:04am (Update History) Reason: Added more points to improve the review
Pros:
Decent niche site featuring both familiar and less well known porn models.
Some scenarios are well thought out if you are patient with the porn flow.
Rarely seen scenes from some of my personal favourites such as Sandy Caine, Cate Harrington, Jess Scotland and Isabella Kay.
Access to a mix of the good and bad of bonus sites. The Bukkake one is good!!
The Nerd Pervert has found some babes that I've not seen on other sites so he is obviously working hard finding fresh new talent so hats off for that.
Cons:
Signed up for this website as I've enjoyed the DVDs so far. However, you need to be aware of cross-selling and potential 'extra charges'as I was charged £27.25 just two days after my $9.95 charge for a one month trial was taken. This is despite me being careful to avoid any cross-selling. Is it any wonder people are wary of paying for porn when this kind of trick happens.
Too much chatter and discussion before the action takes place.
Feels like there was a system in place to ensure you couldn't download too much a day.
If I think about it there were too many chubby types on this site for my own personal tastes.
It would have been good to see N.P breaking out of the formulaic scenes, too many scenes are similar in how they play out. How about some outdoor scenes or something different.
Bottom Line:
Worth a look at for a month perhaps to see what you think and if it suits your tastes but the regular monthly price seems steep to me. Also after a while there is a good chance the very long intros will be skipped through and you will become fed up of the waffle.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Appear to be British porn stars and perhaps a few amateurs.
-A mixed bag of looks. Some attractive, some ordinary.
-Part of My All Access Pass network of about 30 sites
-Great discount through PU. Only $10 for a membership.
-Nice full HD1920x1080, 8000 kbps. 210 40 minute videos.
Cons:
-Undisclosed download limit of 15 GB per day. With HD videos averaging about 2GB, this is unreasonable.
-Very blabby videos with far too much talking. The sex starts approximately 20 minutes into each scene.
-No way to search
-Navigation is not easy or even intuitive. Difficult to scroll forward or back.
-Bill through Rocketpay. Not a big name biller.
-No confirmation email from the biller or the site.
-Prechecked cross sells on sign up
Bottom Line:
Recently I joined the My All Access Pass network of 30 websites. As it was only $10, I thought I had not much to lose. In going through the sites, most are of less than HD quality and therefore I felt not worth bothering with. One that had better quality was NerdPervert.
The videos have top notch stats with most being nice full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps. The ones that are not at that level are at worst HD 1280x720. Not bad at all. The videos are about 40 minutes on average. However they also average about 2GB in size and the network daily download limit is a mere 15GB. I had to ask about this limit as it says nothing on the site, nor on any page that I saw when I signed up. Downloading 210 videos at about 8 per day is ridiculous. I was told most users download an average of 5GB per day. That may be ok for lesser quality, smaller sized videos, but here?
The videos come in three categories. First are 210 undated full videos at about 40 minutes each. Next are nearly as many “verdict” videos where the site stunt cock gives his evaluation of his experience with each woman. This is about three minutes of Paul blabbing about what he liked and did not like. Who cares?
There are also twelve videos labelled as bonus. The only difference between these and the 210 first category videos is that these cannot be downloaded.
The site features Paul Taylor as he has sex with various British women. The idea is that he pretends to be a fake porn talent agent who can get modeling work for the various women. He claims to us that he is conning these women into doing the sex. Each video has the same premise and he is the only stunt cock, except for only one video starring his friend that he lost a bet to.
In each video, he starts by endlessly talking about how he needs sex and how long it has been since his last time. You see him placing ads for models, talking to the camera woman, as well as his friends about everything imaginable. Some is about porn, sometimes other topics. Blab blab blab on and on in every video for about 20 minutes in each one. When he finally interviews the female model you see them pretending to not be the porn stars they really are. I checked and nearly every one is a pro who has made videos for years and now is making her “first appearance”. A few are too plain to actually be porn stars and I could not find any information on them. By the way most of his banter is about how little respect he has for the women he has sex with and how little he cares if they enjoy the scene or not. He sounds like every womanizer I have ever met.
The sex is ordinary, mostly blow jobs, some vaginal and a rare anal scene. Paul expects the women to be energetic, but he does little to make the scenes hot.
There is no search functionality of any kind, the photo sets have only a few screenshots in each, and the site navigation is not easy, not even logical or intuitive. It is hard to get around. Sometimes Paul as well as the models are difficult to understand as their British accents get in the way for Americans.
The site has prechecked cross sells when you sign up. I know for a fact that I unchecked all the boxes, I would even bet my life on it. Yet I was charged $34.95 for a site not in the network but run by the same ownership that I did not authorize or want. I saw this very same complaint on a competing review site and this may be the way they do business. As of this morning I have Amanda contacting the webmaster about a refund.
I cannot recommend this site even though it is part of a 30 site network and is only $10 a month.
I will post the results of my appeal for a refund and maybe even raise my score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Heavily discounted membership price through PU
-Part of network of 30 sites
-Female Hard Body has its latest video at full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-However Model Muscles videos are lesser quality at 1280x720, 2500kbps
-No download limits
Cons:
-The biller is Rocketgate. No confirmation email and none from the site
-Prechecked cross sells on signup
-No way to search
-Model Muscles does not have dates listed for new updates.The site may even be dormant and not updating.
-Zip downloads link does not work for photo sets on Model Muscles
-Female HardBody has only 4 updates in 2017 and may not be updating.
Bottom Line:
The My All Access Pass network includes 30 sites and is available through PU at a steep discount at only $10. Included are two similar sites, Female HardBody and Model Muscles.
Porn Users lists Model Muscles as a glamour site. Maybe there is no better description, but this is very far from what glamour usually means when describing a porn site. These two sites feature extremely muscular women.
When I go to the gym, there are always a handful of women who are serious enough to be called fitness buffs. I would describe them as athletic and well built, sometimes even muscular. I find fit bodies to be attractive, but these two sites have models who are way beyond any level I have ever seen in person.
These look like body building contest winners and therefore I would expect that the number of fans of this type of model in porn is rather small. The two sites are very similar and really I don’t know why there are two different sites.
Mostly the videos are non nude, about the level of bikinis. The number of sets/videos that show breasts is few and the number that have full nudity is even less. The nudity is never explicit. The sex is close to zero as there is only a tiny number of masturbation videos/photos.
In the typical porn photo set, the emphasis is on showcasing the models as sexual. In contrast that is not really true here. The photos and videos mostly showcase muscles and posing, somewhat like what you expect to see at a body building contest. In all fairness there are also a few models that could be on any site and are hotly erotic. Specifically, Charlotte McKenna comes to mind. She has four videos on Female Hard Body that are over the top. Most of the other models have to be a matter of taste. Muscles per se are not really my thing.
Added together there are presently 289 photo sets with 30 to 40 photos in each. There are 81 videos of about five minutes at length. You could easily download all the videos in an afternoon.Both Rabbits and TBP show higher counts in their past reviews. If anyone knows the reason might be for that, please feel free to respond.
The two sites may not be updating any longer.
Model Muscles does not show dates for its updates, but the best quality videos are low level HD 1280x720. Female HardBody is a bit better with full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps. However there are only four updates in 2017. Muscle Nudes has photo sets, but the link to zip download them does not work. Female Hard Body has larger photo sets and the zip download function works.
The member pages were uncomplicated without any advertising. The navigation could have been a bit easier to figure out as it was unnecessarily complicated to go forward or back. There was no search engine and no broken links.
The network has about thirty sites, representing many niches. Porn Users has a great discount price of $10 for a monthly membership. The biller is RocketGate, an ok biller, but not CCbill or Epoch.
I never got a confirmation email from either the site or the biller, but had no trouble canceling. On the sign up page there were two prechecked cross sells, so be careful.
Was it worth joining? There was not enough quality erotic content to satisfy my fussy taste, but it was cheap and maybe the rest of the network will have some better porn. $10 for a network is a price that is very enticing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of very varied genres.
- You're sure to find some genre you like, handjobs, hardcore, trannies, midgets, hairy women, older women, older men with young women, solo girls, wet and messy (WAM).
- Technical quality is questionable, but the downloads work good and the navigation is good, so I'm listing it as a pro.
- A lot of the picture sets come in downloadable zips.
- The problems others have had with this network's billing seem to be fixed. I canceled with no problems.
- Quite a bit of the content is exclusive, but they do use their own content on more than one site. For example, Lori Anderson's My Sex Life has a handjob section in it. The network has a handjob site that is mostly the Lori Anderson handjob videos.
- $9.95 TBP/PU price
Cons:
- Ads, there's an ad at the top of every page that offers a free one day subscription to another site. If I remember the small print it then rebills at $39.99 after one day. You have to avoid clicking it. Then when you go to leave the site and get your mouse pointer up to the url box of your browser, another ad pops up for Jim Slip's site. It's a bit annoying.
- The site design isn't that bad, it has a hub page that has all available sites which can be accessed with one click, but every site works differently and there's no uniformity between the sites.
- I'll go over the mix of genres this network has in it, but I'm really surprised by the extreme differences.
- It's hard to say on the exclusive part. Most or all of it looks exclusive to me, but there's fudging. The site "Teen Photos" comes off as a purely amateur site, then right there on the first page is the forever cute Addison Rose. The advertising of this site in particular comes off as self shot.
Bottom Line:
This is one of my lowest scores I've given in a long time. For those that don't know, I very rarely go below a 70. I try to keep my scoring range in 71-100. My apologies on that part since I can't figure out the difference between a 50 and a 70. By giving this network a 75, I'm saying it's not that good, but if you're interested in the content they have it could be worth a one month join especially with the great TBP/PU price of $9.95.
I'll start with my single biggest complaint. I can't tell you how I dislike sites/networks that don't put dates on their content. It's for multiple reasons. One, if you date your content, it makes it easier to tell when you started putting higher quality videos on the network. It shows if you're still updating. It gives us an idea if the content is just old content being used as archival fill.
That's my feeling with this network. I really don't remember all these sites being in the same network. I've looked at Tampa Swingers before, but don't remember it being in a network this large. Same with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life site. It looks like these are sites that have all stopped updating and were put together as a large collection.
There's nothing wrong with that. There are good things here. The network works well as long as you dodge the ads. I'm betting those ads are the kind that sign you up just from clicking on them. One sits roughly 1 inch above the "see all updates" button.
I'm going to start with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life. Lori has been around for a long time. Her cam schedule on her site still has her listed as active. Freeones has her listed as active since 2004. Most of the content on here looks to be from 2004-2008, basing it on the picture quality and video quality. The videos are 480p. The pictures are 1280 long end and a little blurry. She comments on one of them and says something about her pussy in picture #24 being the cleanest pussy ever. You can't even see it because of blur. She also doubles as one of those models that shouldn't write their own blogs/comments. She explains in one of the sets that she washes her pussy twice a day with a shower massager and never goes to bed without washing it again. Seriously, this is porn, turn me on, don't tell me about your hygiene regimen.
From looking at the other sites, I've not seen a video over 480p. I have seen a few that do have dates on their updates, but can tell you some are wrong. On Teen Girl Photos, a site that's not half-bad, they have picture sets of Addison Rose listed as 2012 that are from 2007-2008, how do I know? I've been collecting her content since 2007 and have sets that look identical to the ones listed as 2012 from 2007. This site is advertised similarly to those "My GF" sites, "Teen Amateur Self-Shot" sites, but like those sites, very little of the advertised content can even be found. Still, it's not terrible especially if you collect any of those models. I think most of that content appeared on Twistys, Teen Dreams, back years ago.
Then there's the unusual, but appreciated mix of genres of sites. If they had a CFNM site I would say they have all genres covered. So there can be a positive there. You might find a few gems you haven't seen before. That's another positive, the network works really well. You're taken to a home page hub that lists each of the sites included in your membership. You can get to each one by clicking them and you don't have to sign in again.
As soon as I start saying positives, a negative comes up, for some reason, after about 30 minutes on the network, it stops recognizing me as a member and gives an unauthorized message when I click on a set/scene. I hit refresh, it recognizes me as a member and pops its tricky ad up in the middle of the page again. Get that off there.
Whether to recommend this network is where I'm most torn. I won't be joining it again and will only keep a small folder of content from it. But if one of those genres or more than one is something you enjoy, you might like it. Just be warned about those silly ads, the fact that you have to refresh it every 20 minutes or so and that I'm going to take a guess and say there's no new content on this network and hasn't been since 2013 or so. There's a handful of scenes that say 2015, but I don't see it in the technical quality of those. So, look at the content and decide if those varied genres would be enough. I think it's the only thing this network really has going for it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lori is a slim, tanned girl catering for most tastes
- Huge amount of content, generally very easy to navigate
- Caters well for BJs/handjobs, but also fetishes too
- All content is downloadable without apparent restriction
- ZIPs of photos available and 2 different video formats
- Lots of extra content such as camshows and messageboard
- Solo site but seems very professionally run
- Well-established site, and still updating
- Many shoots taking place outside adding to the excitement
Cons:
- Limited angles video-wise - normally POV or fixed view
- Lori and her husband are quite vocal and theatrical*
(* Only a con depending on your POV)
- Sometimes too much time spent looking at the guy
- Older updates have videos split into 3-or-so parts
- A lot of the photos are only video screengrabs
Bottom Line:
This is a huge solo amateur website for Lori Anderson. I think her blowjobs are probably the main draw, but there’s plenty of other content such as handjobs, hardcore and girl-girl action. She’s a very slim, slightly-older-than-average natural model with most videos filmed with her husband.
The member’s homepage is very graphical with a collage of Polaroid-style photos from her scenes with a list of categories down the side. It goes far beyond being just the usual ‘pictures’, ‘movies’, ‘camshows’ that you’d expect from a solo site and includes:
Updates: a simple page with a link to her latest update, her latest featured girl and the archives – unfortunately it’s not a chronological, dated list of updates.
Messageboard: A basic message board. Lori is always posting but not too much discussion going on. More active than some though.
My Bedroom: You can book camshow or phone sex sessions with Lori. Solo camshows range from $35 to $90, guy and girl from $75 to $150.
Free Shows: Link to Lori’s Camz Shows page with a timetable of forthcoming shows. At the moment she’s in Florida so none forthcoming but will update this review if that changes.
There’s also links to Member’s Store (an online pharmacy?!), Free Live Feeds (links to Camz Shows), Featured Girls (links and preview content from other sites including Kelly Madison, Club Sandy, Bryci etc), Canadian Girls (18 galleries from Canadian Girls), My Store (downloadable amateur videos featuring Lori for around $25), Bonus Content (another link to Camz Girls), Submit Your Pics (member submitted pictures including... um... how can I put this... member’s ‘members’!)
At the top of all the pages is a drop down menu bar where you can filter by content type (videos or photos) and then by niche (blowjobs, handjobs etc). It makes finding the niches you like pretty easy.
Each category shows updates as 16 thumbnails per page, and the title of the update. Click on the thumbnail, and you get a very comprehensive description of the update and various options listed at the bottom for downloading. On newer updates this is a Flash Video, or a Windows Media Player file in either 640x480 or 320x240. On older updates the videos are split into three-or-so parts. It doesn’t give file sizes or running times. You can save everything, most videos are around 10-15 minutes and the quality isn’t bad. Videos are normally from a fixed position or POV.
Photo-wise it’s disappointing in some respects as most pictures are just screenshots from her video updates. But you can use this to your advantage and use the galleries as a storyboard for the video updates so you can see in detail whether you wish to download the video. The photo/video galleries are linked, so there is a button to skip from photos to videos (or vice versa) at the top of each page.
There are proper photos of her softer updates though (flashing on beaches etc); in this case the images are 1440px on their longest side. In all galleries, you can change the thumbnail sizes and download ZIPs.
Update-wise it seems fair in the amount of updates. It seems to be around once a week, although I can’t say how consistent updates are because none are dated. There is a massive amount of content to be enjoyed, though, and I can imagine as a first-time member her site will definitely keep you occupied throughout your whole membership term.
Most updates are blowjobs and handjobs, but there’s also a lot of hardcore scenes. Lori is quite theatrical in her delivery and her husband is quite vocal too, so that’s definitely worth bearing in mind. Most seem to take place at home, but a refreshing amount outside, whether on boats or in a garden etc. I must admit I do enjoy the feeling of jeopardy with hardcore being done outside so this is great to see.
The fetish section is large. Her fetishes include peeing, bound and gagged, footjobs and more besides. There’s also a trend (not only in fetishes) to show off her hairier than average forearms. I don’t see the appeal, and I’m not sure I’ve ever met anyone who does, but if it is, you’re well catered for.
One complaint is there’s a bit too much man-time on her site. In some updates for example, her husband will often be reclined back, he’s cum, but it’d go over his stomach, then there’d be long and lingering shots of his dick and the mess. There are quite a few examples of this scattered throughout the website, too, and it just seemed a bit odd in those minority of examples. I can imagine it’s an easy mistake for webmasters to make, but it kinda ruined some of the updates.
Overall Lori’s site is very impressive. There is a lot of content to enjoy with the option to enjoy a lot more Lori through things like camshows. Definitely worth joining if you like the look of the previews.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Access to 25 other sites.
+There are 421 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files. Most sets have over 100 pics.
+Resolution varies from set to set but 898x1440 seems to be the lowest one. Many of them are 1000x1333.
+A nice selection of asian models.
+They have 76 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 640x480.
Cons:
-The bulk of their content is not exclusif.
-The bulk of their content is solo models only.
-The majority of the models are unidentified.
-The majority of the content is quite old.
Bottom Line:
*The only major advantage for this site is the multiple site access because I can't imagine that any asian fan will find sufficient content to satisafy his or her needs. Not too mention that the content is pretty old and more than likely available elsewhere. Add the fact that most models aren't identified so you will never if you have that pic set or not.
*There are a couple of other nice sites within the network but they aren't asian based so might not appeal to someone looking for that type of content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+content is mostly all exclusif.
+There are 299 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV.
+There are over 400 phototsets and they can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
+Content is all dated they are still be updating.
Cons:
-There are only about 80 videos at 640x480. The bulk are only 320x240.
-Many of the newer videos are actually only part a complete scene and even some of those videos are split into 2 or more clips.
-I found that the cameran does a poor job on many of the videos and you often don't see the action from the right angles.
-The resolution for pics varies from set to set but anything prior to 2009 isn't worth downloading and I have seen some after 2009 that are only at 800x533.
-The large majority of photosets are taken from the video shoot so not very much variety.
-There is no search option. All you have is a choice between the year and whether it's a photoset or video.
-Site is pretty slow to surf because it takes about 4 seconds from the moment you press the icon to the moment somethin happens.
Bottom Line:
*Tracy has been doing this since 1999 and she doesn't seem to be slowing down. She's a pretty attractyive blond woman in her 40's or maybe even in her early 50's with a very active sex life. She has a few lesbian videos but I never got the feeling that she's really into women. On the other hand she is definetely into men, and the age, number or race of these gentlemen is not important.
**The first major problem is that the bulk of the videos aren't worth looking at or saving because they are onlt at 320x240 and that's such a low resolution. The photoset seem to fair ven worse because most of them are from the video shoots and resolution is way below HD.
**I have a personal problem with the site in regards to anal. There is no anal to be found anywhere except if it's from other performers. She took a small toy in the very beginning but nothing since then. I was hoping that she would have at some point done some but I didn't see any on the site.
-It's difficult to give the site a good score because the content could be good but since you can't really see the bulk of it due to poor quality then all you are left with is stuff done in the last 3 years and that's not enough for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Content is all exclusif and you get a sense that Lori is involved in it.
+There is a nice drop down menu for finding pics and videos using certain keywords.
+585 photosets which are boken down into sub-categories. The resolution varies from set to set but 800x1200 is common.
+353 videos which are also broken into
sub-categories. Resolution on many is now offered in 640x480 and you also have some with 720x480.
+You can book Lori for personal webcams.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
Cons:
All the videos that are hardcore, BJ and handjob star Lori and only her husband. These are all shot using a tripod or handcam.
-The length on many of the vidoes is under 10 minutes.
-Resolution on a percentage of the videos is only 320x240.
-Content is not dated so hard to tell how old it is.
-All the pics except for the glamour sets are taken from the video shoots. Those seem to be the ones with the worst resolution.
Bottom Line:
*This is Lori Anderson's site and she's a 30+ yrs old blond woman with an all natural body that enjoys being filmed doing the nasty with herself, her girlfriends or mostly her husband. I often complain that solo model sites don't make their site more personal. This is not the case here. It looks like Lori is involved and she has done some really good things inside.
*The problem for a guy like me is that the one thing she does wrong are the videos. I like pics but I don't really collect them. I love videos and unless you have some good ones than I'm going to be disapointed. How much depends on how badly the videos are. The first thing that I noticed about the videos is that she has a lot of the same thing. 91 BJ videos with her husband is overkill. You add 63 handjob videos with her husband. Then there are 92 hardcore videos but again they are with her husband. The only ones that don't include her husband are the G/G videos but there are only 17 of these and a couple are barely 10 minutes long.
*I could have overlooked the fact that she only does hardcore with her husband but shooting all that content using a tripod or handcam is a deal breaker. It made sense that in the beginning they wanted to save money by shooting their own content but at some point they should have hired someone to film them. As it is. All you really have are variation of the same stuff.
***If you like or don't mind videos that are shot using a tripod or handcam than you will be happy with Lori's site. I'd recommend that anybody like me avoid it.***
-My score is based on what they offer and not what I took from it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Katie is a super cute teen model. Her looks remind me a lot of Stoya, Sasha Grey and Sasha rose.
-She has a couple of midcore/hardcore solo vidoes.
-You get access to 25 other sites.
Cons:
-The site is slow to surf. It takes 4-5 seconds for something to happen once you click an icon.
-There are only 50 photosets and to make things worse. You can't even download them as a single zip file.(on a side note TBP's March 2011 review had 59 pic sets)
-There are only 37 videos and most of them are softcore to midcore in nature.(on a side note TBP's March 2011 review had 46 videos).
-None of the content is dated so there's no way of knowing if the site is still updating or what kind of schedule she uses.
Bottom Line:
-Katie has the perfect body for my taste and if she was really seriuous about porn and there was decent content then I'd have a hard staying away. As it is this site is not worth visiting let alone paying to access the measly amount of content.
-My score is based purely on this site as a stand alone since the content on the other sites in the network might not appeal to the people looking at this site.
**The only great thing about this site is that
I got access to the network for 13$ less than if I'd joined through another site. The trick is to visit this site and once you click to leave then a pop up screen appears with the special offer.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Dee is a gorgeous red head milf who loves sex in all it's varied form from a simple BJ to a G/G shoot followed by B/G vaginal and then to the more intense anal, DP's and gang bangs.
-It's all exclusif content.
-There are 144 videos which can be viewed online or downloaded.
-All videos can be downloaded as wmv files and they now also offer flash for some videos. The resolution on the wmv is 640x480.
-99% of all the videos come with a derscription of the action.
-You get access to 25 other sites with your membership.
Cons:
The site is slow to surf. I counted 4-5 seconds for something to happen once you click an icon. That's more frustrating than anything else.
-Dee is an older woman and some might consider her a little chubbier than your average porn girl.
-You have 210 photosets but they don't offer the option of downloading as a complete zip file. You'd have to be a pretty patient fan to want to download each pic one at a time.
-The content on some of the other sites is leased and not necessarily of great quality.
-Some of the other sites offered might not appeal to most people
-I can't confirm that the site is till updating with new content except to say that some of the stuff was dated 2010.(on a side note: TBP says that the site was launched in 2010 but there is content going back to 2006)
Bottom Line:
-Dee is an amazing woman with a voracious sexual appetite who seems to really like IR performers and definetly enjoys it when there is more than one person at a time. She really gets off during her shoots because you can clearly see her have orgasms. I'm not sure who films her videos but he's good enough that the camera is often in the right place at the right time.
-This site should appeal to anyone looking for a 30 to 40yrs old woman who loves to have sex in front of a camera.
-To be avoided by anyone looking for waif thin teen girls having sex.
**I got access to the network for 17$ instead of 30$ by joining katie reynolds site. You simply visit Katie's site and once you click to leave then you get a pop up offer for the special price** Although I undertand why sites don't offer it upfront. I still think they'd get more business by offering it right away.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Over 24000 hot pics
+ Over 270 private home videos
+ Exclusive content
+ Frequent updates (near weekly)
+ High quality pics and vids
+ Horny cam girl
+ MPEG, WMV video formats
+ Good variety of hardcore & softcore
+ No DRM protection
+ No download limit
+ 11 sites are included with membership
Cons:
- No ZIP sets for pictures
- No separate video episodes
- A little bit pricey for an amateur site
- No Hi-Res pictures
Bottom Line:
This website is all about wonderful Sex Life sultry cam babe Lori Anderson. She loves to express herself sexually and offers her private home video collection. Her content is not separated by photos and videos, but broken down into these categories: Softcore, Girl/Girl, Toys, Fetish, Handjobs, Blowjobs, Hardcore and Glamour Photos. The quality of the content is good. Videos (90% of all) are available in WMV format (display at 320x240, 1000Kbps) and MPEG format (display at 320x240, 700 Kbps). Most of scenes are around 15-20 minutes split into 2-1/2 minute clips for quick downloads. Picture size varies depending on the set, ranging from a small 567x441 to a much better 1024x768. They are shot with a Sony Cybershot (8 megapixel camera). Everything can be downloaded. The videos also come out like DVD. You can leave messages for Lori and other members on her message board. You will also find monthly desktop calenders and desktop wallpapers featuring her nude and semi-nude. In addition to all this, there are several bonus features that have off site photo galleries and videos, as well as full access to a network of bonus sites. My Sex Life is a good variety of hardcore & softcore. Just what I needed.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Tracy's actually pretty attractive and she really seems to enjoy most of her encounters.
- This site features a pretty large number of videos and pictures crossing several years.
- You get some other site access with your membership (even with the trial membership)
- The trial membership was for full content access.
Cons:
- The site seems a bit disorganized due to the somewhat amateur level of the site coding.
- The video quality varied pretty widely.
- Many of the guys participating in the encounters are just plain out of shape; that was pretty off-putting.
- A few times, Tracy seemed to get bored with the action.
Bottom Line:
If you're looking for a decent quality amateur site, you might want to give this one a try. You really can't go wrong checking it out over the 2 days that are included with the trial.
This is basically a middle-of-the-road amateur site. There are definitely better sites out there, but the full-access trial membership might be worth checking out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+nice group and gangbang action on the sites that have content
+a true swinger site with 100% exclusive content
Cons:
+Video quality is low for todays amature site standards
+ older videos are even worse quality
+ there are only 2-3 wives on this sight that have a decent about of content. The other 30 wives they have listed suck for content.
Bottom Line:
I was a Trial member middle of last year. As a first time member it appears to be alot of content. But only from 2 or 3 of the Wives listed. If you like amature action of real swinger parties then this is a good site for you. Even thou I gave negative comments on the Vid quality (mostly 300K) some of the newer (500K) the videos were still clear enought to get off on the action.
I recently resigned back up (trail) and found that not much had updated since last year(8/2006). Plus it seemed the updates were just repeated senarios.
I would have given it a lower score except the fack that they give you a full trail for $4. I recomed to take the trail and a good download manager and get the videos. Since I am not a picture guy, I can't elaborate for the pics on the site.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
