Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the purest, realest porn sites
Women of all ages, body types and experience levels
Really the only story I need porn to have
Artistic, dramatic, all from amateur, sometimes self-shot videos
Scenes are presented how masturbation is – climatic
Takes some time to get used to using the site, but sooner is more likely than later
Cons:
Download limit of 15GB per day. I have tried to hit it but haven’t been able to download more than 10GB per day.
There are no pictures. You can make your own from the videos, but there are no separate photo sets
Bottom Line:
I feel myself deserves an award for being the best and most accurately named site. All the content is about women – feeling themselves. I always thought this site sounded boring. It’s not. I was just dumb. Really dumb. There is so much beauty and eroticism in the videos. From seeing goosebumps on a young woman’s thighs, to seeing a woman quiver and shake with a screaming orgasm. I got the feeling a lot of these women didn’t even know how loud or vocal they are. This is one of those sites that what’s missing may be the biggest positive. There are no naked men or balls or dicks or preparation for the money shot. I have to believe the women on this site feel different about shooting these scenes than women being filmed in hardcore scenes.
At the core of the content, you are watching a woman with an exhibitionistic side performing for the camera and how many ever eyes she wants to fantasize is watching. I believe that is true. You see raw emotions. You feel the orgasms. You can even see the orgasms as contractions get in time with body quivers.
And that is the only story I need from porn. A woman wants to orgasm and wants me to watch her. No need for attempted acting or even acting natural. There is no acting on this site. It’s all real. Every orgasm, toe curl, nipple squeeze, moan, shriek, it’s all real. If I stopped right there, I would feel confident about scoring this site between 95-100.
I’m stopping there. There are close to 6,000 videos. There’s nothing to talk about with the videos except the 1080p download option.
The settings alone could be a part of story. Most of these look like a woman at a hotel or her own bed, masturbating and showing off her orgasms. I don’t even pay attention to if they have clothes on to begin the scenes. I don’t care if they are fully dressed. The thrill from these scenes has to do with watching the woman reach blissful ecstasy. Her insecurities, moral beliefs, are all removed for a 10-30 second eruption of orgasms.
I find myself surprised by how little the nudity or lack thereof doesn’t truly affect the scenes and their hotness. Women masturbating in their panties is a lot hotter than I thought it was. It’s because these women are really masturbating and not just performing for pay.
The most attractive part of any of the scenes for me is when the woman is masturbating. She looks at the camera and you can see her legs spreading more like she was shy, but it feels too good to be shy. There is a lot of the feeling of these models reach a point, in nearly every scene, where nothing, but that orgasm matters to them.
The people who own this site also own Beautiful Agony and I Shot Myself. Beautiful Agony is similar to I Feel Myself except it is nearly always focused just on the woman’s face. I Feel Myself shows the face and body trying to fight, hide, restrain, the embarrassing orgasm, leading to the tension, relief and release. You can learn a lot about the human body by watching these scenes. You can see every muscle that tightens up during orgasm.
It's definitely different, but for me, it is the unique one, while other sites try their more complex-view of porn. It likely is the strongest point of I Feel Myself. It’s simple, nothing complex, no dumb story to get in the way and most importantly, no biased director or producer telling the woman how to feel or moan or enjoy or sound.
It's performance porn. The whole world is the stage. The models truly look like they are performing for a sold out group of people.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It focuses on putting you in a woman’s bedroom or two women’s bedroom and watching them during their most intimate times.
Excellent camerawork that captures the model’s faces at the right times, it’s not always that explicit.
More updates than some networks and it’s just one site. Sixteen so far in April 2022 and it’s only the 11th of the month.
Emotionally charged scenes that will make you forget formulaic.
Real orgasms in under 10-15 minutes that will make you wonder what you’re doing wrong.
Much appreciated tags that are some of the most specific I’ve seen. Aimed at people with obscure fetishes?
Cons:
Some of the videos are under a minute and aren’t masturbation.
Real women from what I can tell that aren’t porn models. That’s going to be a con to some.
Bottom Line:
A site that surprised me a lot. Who knew a porn site could be named prophetically? This site should make anyone feel themselves. There is nothing high-tech with the site. It’s just an older looking site that looks like they decided to let their scenes speak for itself. I haven’t seen many of these niches before. There are scenes that I really liked of women masturbating while watching porn. That’s not something I see much in porn. There are scenes of women in a dark room with some clothes on, all clothes on, no clothes on, masturbating over their clothes, under the clothes and nude. The nice women hop up on their knees and give you a better view. The naughty ones are too busy enjoying themselves and don’t care who is watching or if you’re liking it. It’s almost too real. Possibly too real for some people to like even. Not me and not specifically you, just some.
The tags are an important part to me and part of the reason I’ll come back to the site. When they list “hairy” the woman really is hairy. They even have a tag for “pets”. Which is there for you guessed it. A pet decided to get in the view of the camera. They make sure to tell you there’s no bestiality. The tags include ones like “tattoo free” and “hands on” meaning no sex toys. There are ones for “flush” as a redhead, I know about flush skin. These tags tell you so much more about the parts of porn that people complain more about than those silly stories most sites have on the scenes. There is even a “watching porn” tag. I don’t think any site has this specific of tags.
The quality is surprisingly good. Most of the videos have 720p or 1080p download options. There is a download limit, but I have not reached it. It does seem small at 10 GB per day. But the scenes are short. There’s not much talking in any of the scenes. You get some moaning. And the tag I think really plays to people with fetishes is, “contractions”. That means the woman contracts during orgasm. I try to keep up with everything the tags said to expect. The older scenes are not as explicit as the newer ones. I believe they maybe changed their style of scenes or the women in the scenes changed. Some of these women – I am assuming all are amateurs, really go at masturbating and making sure you see everything. It is a style of porn I am not used to. I noticed there is a quote from a user of that site that says she cried the first time she watched a scene from the site. That could be more normal than we think. This site makes it very clear that these women want to be filmed, want to enjoy themselves without being insulted or stereotyped. You end up with some very good performances.
It may still fall short for some people. The only story is these women want to orgasm. There’s no stepdad is watching, and mom is with stepbrother in the shower. It does seem like a very different type of porn than we are used to. It looks more like a woman decided to get naked and said, “Okay, turn the camera on. I’m ready!” There are scenes that have more than one person and those have some talking. They even have a tag for talking. I just can’t explain how important those tags are and the best feature of the tags, if you scroll over the tag, it tells you what it means. Like “Tummy Girls” that means the woman masturbates some in the video while facing down usually with her butt up in the air. It even gives you some educational tidbits like, “20% of women say they masturbate facing down sometimes.”
I don’t know about recommending it. I would, but I have heard things from porn fans. Things that made me want to find different porn. This site really does that for me. I am sure on the score too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Quite possibly the most genuine porn in terms of performer enjoyment that I've ever come across.
Great diversity in body types of the performers - something for everyone.
Huge amount of content that can be streamed or downloaded. Archive of video clips totaling 5427 according to the site, dating back to 2006, and all around 5 to 15 minutes long, with HD option offered on videos since 2009.
Frequent updates - appears to be daily while I've been a member.
Community forum that's contributed to by staff from site, the performers, and members.
Cons:
Unable to search videos by niche.
Many of the performer's videos are released as a part 1 and 2. This doesn't take away from the quality of either part as a stand alone video, this site generally ensures at least 1 orgasm happens in each vid - but it looks like there's often a week long gap between both parts being released, even though they were both shot from the same performance.
Bottom Line:
This site makes a point of using genuine amateurs for the most part, and letting them masturbate however they want to capture how they best achieve self orgasm. The resulting content, in my opinion, is 2nd to none in both the female masturbation niche, and in terms of depicting women genuinely having a great time and getting off.
I found the lack of being able to search by niche a little disappointing. They do somewhat make up for this by having a 'List of Lists' section on their forum, where they encourage members and performers to make their own lists of videos with desired niches (i.e. body types, squirting, toys, etc.). I do appreciate why they've gone this route - likely taking the view that all performers add equal value to the site and their vids deserve to be enjoyed rather than categorized, but I personally would've liked the option.
None the less - it's difficult to be too critical of the most genuine porn I've come across. If you're after female masturbation videos, look no further!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the most realistic, most believable and most natural porn site on the internet.
- 5,408 scenes of mostly solo masturbation but also has lesbian and some male/female.
- I've been a member here off and on for over 10 years.
- Uses GMBill, a lesser known biller but I've never had any problems with them.
- Updates daily, sometimes twice.
- Women of nearly all shapes, size and looks.
- Navigation takes some getting used to but I've been a member enough that it's pretty easy to use and find what you're looking for.
- Scenes vary from closeups of the model's face to more explicit scenes that show everything.
- Defines the word erotic in the porn world better than any other site.
- Very high technical quality on videos, see bottom line.
- Categories that make it easy to find what you're looking for once you get used to the names of the categories.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max)
Cons:
- It can be overwhelming. The model list is next to impossible to use to count the models.
- Will apply to any and everyone that joins it, there will be some models you won't find attractive.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I gave this site an 85. That was also when most of the content just focused on the model's face and showed very little nudity. I enjoyed some of those scenes but thought it was too soft which is unheard of from me. I even like non-nude "porn".
The scenes have become more explicit though nowhere near as explicit as most sites. There's a connection, for me, between the model and her willingness to be more explicit, to be more vocal and that's a selling point for me. It's women enjoying themselves naturally and most look very comfortable doing it. I don't even know if that's true. Maybe the ones that just show their face/expressions/moans just aren't in the mood to show more on that day.
I do lean towards and favor the ones that show more. Some of them will pull up porn on their laptop and masturbate while watching it. Which kind of makes me laugh a little since I think it shows us men are more impatient than women. You never see them fast forwarding. I also like the minimal production, the lighting, I have bad eyesight and it gets worse when looking at bright lights. The scenes are very good for those into voyeurism.
The numbers can be a little confusing. With 5,408 videos, I'm using their number on that, this is a very large site. They have 2,269 scenes listed as studio. 1,208 listed as fantasy and adventure. 898 listed as homemade. 411 as close-up. 377 as video diary. 157 as lucubrations and 88 as loose ends.
Most of those are self-explanatory. The loose ends ones are shorter, there's outdoor pissing, talking, and as shown by the number this is a very small part of the site. The video diary ones once fooled me into thinking they were interviews but they're not. All that I've watched are masturbation including some exhibitionism.
The video quality on the newest scenes tops out at 1080p, there's also a 540p version and a 270p version. The scenes are short enough that most of the 1080p versions are at or around 500MB each.
Graphic descriptions usually aren't needed for porn but one of my biggest fetishes is hard nipples. You can watch scenes here where you can see the models nipples getting harder. This content is now very appealing to me. My last review of it was during a period of my porn journey that favored and preferred hardcore content. Now, I can see, hear and enjoy this porn possibly the way it's supposed to be.
I didn't list this as a con only because I think it would detract from the scenes, there are no pictures. Most of these models look like they've got themselves ready to go and perform, so throwing in "how about we take 150 photos real quick" might break that momentum.
It's also one of the few sites that has bios for the models that seem real. They list their favorite books, movies and music. Depending on your own taste in those, you can pick up on one for example, saying she's an ABBA fan.
I do like the girl/girl scenes as these seem to be very believable, a major selling point in lesbian porn but really don't care for the male/female scenes.
I think it would be easy for some to miss the model search feature. I know it's right there but it is very in-depth. I use the nationality filter to look for models that fit a look I usually prefer like Brazil where I found Ana B who might be one of the most expressive and active models on the site. Even giving the view of her masturbating on her stomach. If you're patient with the model search you find out it's very useful. You can pick nationality, type of scene (solo, friends), even age range.
If you're going to complain about anything on it I would say the layout, having 513 pages of 10 scenes per page is overwhelming. Use the model search. They do list the model's name and if you click it you can see all of the model's scenes which at least lets you focus on the models you like best.
I don't think this is a site you can really take in over one month. I'm thinking it's going to take me 3 months to get everything I want.
It's a good example of why it's so hard to score a site a 100. There are just minor problems that stop it from being perfect. On a personal note, I would like to see a few more Asians. And looking for them showed another minor problem, the older, I would even say oldest scenes are 480p. I found that when I found a Japanese model from 2008.
Beyond those minor complaints this is a site that does erotic better than all the sites I see promoting themselves as erotic. I also want to mention I haven't hit any download limits but haven't download more than 10GB or so in any of my days as a member.
Great site, now if I can just get myself to cancel it after another month or two.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-03-2003:21am (Update History) Reason: Score was updated as site webmaster cleared up some details
Pros:
-Countdown timer till next release and the next 3 releases are shown with release dates. It looks like they release one video a day
-Advertise 5300 videos and as far as I can tell, over 450 models
-Videos have upload date
-Can download videos and add to favourites
-Have an advanced search option
-Great mics for picking up the little sounds like pants zips and vibrators
-Models don’t look at the camera, they are too busy having a good time with themselves which is sexier than trying to please the camera
Cons:
-Videos were not as clear as they should be with HD. Unsure if it was my connection though
-No photo sets
-Only 12 videos are displayed on a page at a time
-Can’t comment on videos or models
-Videos with multiple models are on the site multiple times. If it’s a threesome it’s there three times, which pads out content a lot. (their ‘friends’ category has 660 videos but they’re all copies so they maybe only have 350 separate videos) - edit: I have since been told that listing the same video multiple times doesn't affect the total video count
Bottom Line:
IFM is a site dedicated to the female orgasm. A lot of the videos are shot in their studio, which is a bed with white sheets. Their camera shots are good and they have a camera on the ceiling looking down on the model on the bed. Their mics are high quality and so you can hear all the sounds like zippers, buttons, moans, vibrators, those juicy wanking noises..
The videos are quite short at around 10min and are organised into different categories which are displayed on the left sidepanel. The categories have odd names like unseen (videos I haven’t yet seen, you can mark videos as ‘seen’), lubrications (model interview), loose ends (extra footage), friends (pair and group sex). Others are ‘studio’ and ‘homemade’ (obvious) and ‘fantasy and adventure’ ie in places that are not bedrooms. Not all models have a lubrication video but as far as I could see, most have a model page which you can find through ‘video profiles’. Here each model has a video of them talking about themselves, and the profile links to all their videos. A good touch. You can’t comment on models or videos but they have a forum that is very active and the moderators and contributors are also active on it.
Although it’s very nice to see women getting off by themselves enjoying some alone time, by the nature of the site it’s very same same and I am more likely to watch only a few videos at a time than spend hours because of this. They also have quite a few videos of GG or group sex. There were even some videos with GB. I enjoyed this as it was something different but it was unexpected because of the site’s name.
All in all it’s a nice site that's videos are focussed on personal intimacy, connection with the models, and the little details.
They have 5,190 videos, these range from studio, homemade, closeup, fantasy and adventure.
These videos -- especially the newer ones -- are more explicit than other sites like the one and I see that as a plus.
Excellent use of artistic representations, the rooms are mostly bare, the light isn't blaring bright and it creates a distant, lonely feeling for the solo model.
They average 10-12 updates per month and as far as I can tell these are all amateurs.
Expresses the beauty of the female orgasm without requiring a perfect or fit body with models of all different shapes and sizes.
Billed through a biller I was not familiar with, GM Bill, but it was easy to use and easy to cancel.
Cons:
The navigation is difficult. They have 12 videos per page, 433 pages.
It is not all solo, they have in the 700 range of girl/girl and boy/girl scenes. That's a tough con to use against them, but the site is I Feel Myself.
Bottom Line:
This site should be joined for more than 1 month. I find the explicit, solo masturbation scenes to be my favorite. There's excellent camerawork that includes perfect sound. You see the women's faces as the orgasm, you hear their moans, you can see some of their orgasms causing contractions.
There's a high amount of voyeuristic quality to the scenes. You get the feeling of the fly on the wall.
I listed the non-solo scenes as a con, but only by definition of the site's name. Some of those scenes are very good. Of all the sites I have joined (not that many), this one has to be in the top 3 for eroticism.
You will find yourself not paying as much attention to how the model looks, or what her body shape and size is, instead, paying attention to her bodily movements, spasms, moans and how her hand carelessly reaches up to squeeze her nipple harder than she probably meant to.
I have told in previous reviews I am not a lesbian. I am not even bi-curious. I am drawn to this content for the natural sexual expression, it could be a man or woman and it would work either way.
The site itself doesn't have a lot to talk about. Over 5,000 videos, there's no model list, the navigation is close to archaic, but they do have ways for you to find the different content. If you find a model you like you can click her name and it will show you if they have other scenes of her. They have the scenes broken into categories including one called "friends" that focus on the scenes with girl/girl content and boy/girl content.
The site doesn't look like it is have been updated in layout style or programming in 20 years, but everything works well.
If I find anything truly disappointing with it it is the multi-month or long-term membership options. They offer a 3 month plan for $70. I am on my 6th week and probably would have been better off joining it for 3 months, but $70 just seems like a steep price to pay upfront.
I also wonder if they have considered making a boy/girl site in similar style. I usually prefer high production qualities. These scenes are probably the most basic I've seen and it works for them.
I'm going to go a little off-track by saying as much as I like the desolate, lonely room, I would like to see more open scenes, maybe outdoors or in a different room, position -- like on the couch or in the bathtub.
The video quality does vary. They have HD videos going back to 2009. I haven't seen any picture sets.
A lot of the older scenes are less explicit, but overall, this site has impressed me in nearly every way. I'll come back to it eventually. The content is worth the price. I would recommend it to men and women alike. This just doesn't feel like a porn site. It feels like genuine, human sexual expression and that's something you just don't see a lot of. Very highly recommended.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that sells itself as being different from the normal, mainstream porn site ... and for the most part it succeeds.
- Daily updates, right at 2,302 videos in HD. If you accept 1280x720 as HD.
- Amateur content, some girl/girl, including some with 3+ girls and some boy/girl. Mostly solo and that's their strength.
- I think the price is fair for unique, exclusive content.
- Would think women who are into watching other women masturbating would be a big market here.
- There's no cameraman asking a million stupid questions...
Cons:
- Continuing from pros is the first con: Things are mostly artsy and tame here. I don't doubt the authenticity of the masturbation we see on this site, but I do wish the girls were more into the masturbation. (Further in BL)
- There's no pictures. If there are pictures I can't find them.
- I'm mostly positive on this site, but the navigation is terrible. I was last a member on here in 2007 (review in my history here). I honestly don't think they've changed anything about the navigation since then.
Bottom Line:
You would think my score might be lower than it is since there's some pretty big cons, but the quality of the content outweighs the downfalls.
This is a fairly straightforward website that promotes enjoyment for their performers/submitter and their audience alike. It's a good take on porn in today's cookie-cutter porn world, but that navigation is really bad. I would go as far as saying that I took off 10 points for the navigation.
The good parts: The girls seem like normal, average girls. Some are playful, some are even silly and many are shy. I like the dark-style of videos since it gives the viewer a little of a voyeur feel like you're peeping in on the masturbation. There's a fairly broad selection of model body types and ages. There are the occasional girl/girl (or even more than 2 girls) scenes and a few boy/girl scenes that sometimes just includes the guy giving the girl oral.
As with any site like this one, there will be models that aren't generally looked at as attractive, but I personally haven't seen any that I would call ugly.
Video quality is good and has been for a long time. They've been making HD videos long enough to have nearly 2,500 HD videos. Another mention that there are no photos. I really wouldn't want photos of the masturbation, but a few (maybe 5-10) in clothes would be nice.
Then there's the navigation:
Going to the home page opens up a scrolling page with the most recent 10 videos. Below those 10 are numbers, 370 (as of 3/15/2016) to be exact. If you're on the home page you are on page 1. You then click on page 2 and there's 10 more videos and the 369 other pages below them. Click on page 3 and you're getting 10 more videos with the numbers below them.
I have to keep a running tab on what page I was last on.
I will give them credit for at least renaming their scenes to whatever name they gave it on the website so you at least can look to see if you've downloaded a scene already.
Over in the left margin there's a group of categories, which I have no clue what they mean. Lucrabations is one. I didn't misspell that. It's how they have it spelled. Sure, I can click on it and find out what type of scene a Lucrabation is, but why should I have to do that?
It gets worse. If you go to the search function you have these options:
Categories (Home Made, Up Close, Etc)
Attribute (Solo, Friends, HD, Full HD)
Display Mode
Date
To show why it frustrates me:
I searched for "all categories, Full HD, Anytime"
0 results.
Which is understandable since they don't have any Full 1080p videos, but why even put the option in there? I already don't know what the categories stand for since they're mostly non-descriptive. Here those are just in case you're curious:
Studio, Home Made, Up Close, Fantasy and Adventures, Lucrabations, Loose Ends.
Fantasy and Adventures seems to be based around location, some are outside, some are in front of an open window, some are in the shower, etc...
With that being said, whose fantasy and adventures are we talking about?
Despite my complaints, I believe they do exactly what they say do. It's a site with a lot of amateur girls masturbating. They do the close-up camera on the face of the model at times, then between the legs, then between the boobs, it's different. I just wish they would make the site a little easier to use or I should say less time-consuming since you have to click through page after page to decide on what to download.
A tip I've been using to make the navigation a little more tolerable is to go into the search, mark all the boxes then enter a from date and a to date. Use a date that is easy to remember and make it a year period. This makes the scroll, click task a little less frustrating and makes it easier to use. I would still say it's the top in its genre. And would recommend it to those who like amateur solo and girl/girl videos, but have no interest in pictures.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
High production values.
Great contributors.
Forum interaction.
Well moderated.
Cons:
Like most sites, the older contributors aren't in HD but that's not a con, just a limitation of the time when the earlier vids were filmed.
Bottom Line:
IFM is geared toward the female orgasm so hardcore fans would be left wanting. For me, the reward is in the site's honest effort to produce something a bit more artistic and personal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The solo action here is exactly what Im interested in : They're done mostly on a bed by models lying on their backs, starting slowly removing clothes piece by piece as gyrations intensify and build up to their masturbation scenes, most of which are done very well and in different degrees of momentum. All acts culminates in orgasms.
Each models page opens with her name, length and size of the video. An option to stream or download in either WMV or High performance. Also on the model's page is a list of her other clips, onto which one can simply click to open.
Video quality is quite satisfactry, with some inovations added I haven't seen elsewhere.
A forum exist for those who want to communicate their thoughts .
Updates are done on a daily basis, although too complicated for me to figure out.
A page navigation with over 200 sections listing about six models pages is a convincing reminder there's ample videos for the full price
Cons:
The fact clips are so artfully done, one can almost overlook the shortage of the usual glamor one finds in most models found on other sites of it's kind.
Perhaps its a good thing, though, because the "plain Jane" "real-life" type we get here does appear to present a fresh change.
But, I hasten to add there's no shortage of "babes" either, whose natural beauty introduces something Porn marketing could use more of.
Many of the clips were done which included the model's girlfriends, conversations, and girl-stuff which interested me in no fashion.
IFM promotes, as well as present too much space for their other pay sites to suit me.
I left them alone for fear Id be roped into joining another site.
Bottom Line:
I visited this site a couple years ago, and, upon this recent revisit, I found little change except for the added models.
As I mentioned earlier, IFM is unique and is giving me mostly what I want: Realism, routines done with elements to please most everybody. They seem to sincerelly have their members' interest in mind.
One thing that stood out for me was the absence of those infernal toys. The fact I saw little if any of them this time has a lot to do with heightening my respect for IFM's skills at running this kind of site.
I'm also pleased to see less vaginal "gouging." I suppose this whole hand digging stuff is done for effect. The more I can see of her virgina, especially on angle shots, the more I like it.
I would sumit my vote, however, for more full-body scenes and limited closeups...esp. those which dwell too long on the same spot.
If there was a disappointment to be had, Id have to say it was the unavailability of any form of discount through our PU The Best Porn.
Although the membership and renewal price is the full $29.95, I'm convinced I'm still getting my money's worth.
I like IFM; And I enthusiastically recommend it: And its very likely I'll join again.
PS...
Please note this is an edited revision of my review of I Feel Myself.
Since I did this initial review of IFM, I came to realize I had acted too hastly with some of my judgements, and I think it only fair to IFM to rectify those actions, if indeed they cast any negative connotations that would otherwise effect the decisions of those contemplating joining this site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive content of mostly Amateur girls masturbating until they reach authentic orgasm.
- Content explores the realist orgasms you can find with focus on contractions, writhing, suddle noises, and facial gestures.
- HD movies available in HD mp4 (1280 X 720 with ~5,000 kbps), HI-Q mp4 and Wmv, med-q Wmv and m4v with roughly 400 videos available in HD.
- Updates at least one video daily.
- No DRM.
- Site navigation is quite straight forward.
- Site design is easy on the eyes and sleek enough.
- My IFM section includes total downloaded overall, amount downloaded that day for download limit monitoring, login dates and times, and you can select server for greater speeds.
- Active forum.
- Model index with some good info like age, where the model is from, favorite books, favorite music, favorite cinema, and a few random words they want.
Cons:
- Most models are attractive but do not expect the majority to be fake and plastic barbie dolls. Most models are women you see on a daily basis at like a grocery store enjoying their bodies. Plus, some are so called 'hipsters' and may not shave and so on.
- There is a focus on showcasing 'genuine orgasms in a tasteful way' which I agree with but some content can be considered too artsy which results in low lighting, static cameras, and non-preferred views.
- The attempt to make models the most comfortable as they can be results in real orgasm but mostly in one position and not a huge amount of camera presence.
- Model index is labeled as 'artists' which the artists are considered the models in the scenes, which can actually be hard to find and may be overlooked.
- Most videos are split up as seperate updates and makes for daily updates but repetitive content.
- 6 GB download limit.
- no pictures or screens but understandable to an extent due to comfort level attempts.
Bottom Line:
This site dedicated to showcasing authentic female orgasms. The site delivers in this aspect because I rarely saw any of the fake moans and non-movement you see on many sites that are supposably showcasing female masturbation to orgasm. These girls here actually writh and contract while making noises no one would ever expect to come out of a female mouth which is exactly what happens with a real female orgasm if you have witnessed one first hand. You won't get the classic porn 'ohhs' and 'ahhs' here, but full out chest turning red and dolphin noise making orgasms; all caught on video for you.
However, with that said there are some things that detracts from the site. For one, the sites dedication to real orgasm does not mean lighting has to be so dark. A female does not need to be in darkness to achieve full orgasm and many of the studio videos are filmed in extremely low lighting. However, I do understand the camera presence may detract from comfortableness so the camera may stay a bit static for the shoot. This does not bother me as much as the lighting but keep in mind about the static camera which mostly stays overhead looking down on the model, usually full body shots. But, I will admit that many videos will end up going to other angles eventually which is a nice touch and improvement but it is not always present.
The sites models are overall nice but I believe you have to be a fan of amateur models to fully enjoy the content. Personally, many of the models to me were just too average looking and detracted from my overall fantasy. However, there are some gems present in the bunch even for the most jaded. However, I cannot stress this enough if you are thinking about joining.
There is a few different types of content present. You have studio made content, home made content, interviews, lesbian footage, and 'diary' footage. The studio and home made footage are quite self explanatory. However, interviews and diary footage can be a bit different. This footage usually involves none to very little nudity and a lot of talking. The lesbian footage is quite erotic but the model selection reminds me of what real lesbians mostly look like. They are usually quite hipster with shorter hair and less shaving but are actually extremely passionate. An interesting difference in content that may be enjoyed by others.
Overall, the sites focus is well played and you will get what you are looking for, the real female orgasm. However, the site does fall short in regards to the overall delivery. Attempts at changing location turn in to artsy settings and the overall location is just a static, poorly lighted bedroom. But, I can give justification for some of these aspects due to the site trying to make these models the most comfortable to reach full and real orgasm. However, some footage seems to go a bit too far with the lighting, static camera, and setting. All-in-all, you will get a lot of great footage and they are probably the best at authenticity.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Still the most realistic masturbation site out there - no make-up encrusted, siliconed-injected models, just women enjoying themselves
+ Unlike other masturbation sites, the women here don't typically play to the camera
+ The site is moving into Hi-def (see bottom line and my comment at right)
+ Files available in high and low resolution wmv and high and low resolution mov
+ 1000+ episodes up, running an average of 5-10 minute each
+ Daily updates (with one con below)
+ They seem to be getting away from the same old "bird's eye view", dimly lit shoots. More women are doing shoots outdoors and in locations other than a bed
+ The member's forum is as alive as ever, with people commenting on the site and the girls daily
Cons:
- Update schedule is still light with only one episode added per day
- Found out the hard way that there's a 3 gig a day download limit. Go over and you're locked out for 24 hours
Bottom Line:
Well... I still don't have a job but I couldn't resist this one. This has always been one of my favorite sites and I just happened to be checking the site to see what's what. I saw exactly what I'd been looking for - IFM is moving to hi-def! So, the credit card took a hit and back in I went.
As of the date of this review there's about a week's worth of 720x576 video up and I have to say it's a most welcome addition. Bitrates have jumped from 900+ to 1600+ so the files look GOOD. Now I'm eagerly awaiting the the higher resolutions. The updates still just come one a day so I think this is still one of those sites you join, download for the month, then leave to join again after the content has built up. Just be careful when you go back and try to catch up that you don't download more than 3 gigs a day or you get locked out for 24 hours.
Definitely tops in it's niche as it is, if they could get more than an episode a day up, I'd say this site would be about as perfect as you can get.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-All other masturbation oriented sites fade to a pale pink in comparison.
-The Female orgasm, not a phrase usually associated with porn, is on full display.
-A host of fresh faces. Does anyone claim to have seen these gals elsewhere? Other than its non-nude sister site beautifulagony.com
-Most lose themselves to their pleasures, others stare straight into the lens. Some of each group generate yells and groans that are klaxon-loud. I dare say the building has no mice.
-During the post-orgasm, the sensation overload leaves some barely ambulant as good sex is a gentle cathartic.
-While some don't get naked, I enjoy the slow undressing of those that do. Many begin by rubbing thru their garments & this may continue for some time before blouse, bra and panties are removed at leisure.
Cons:
-Understandably, a vid only site, as moans/groans don't translate well to pics.
-Some updates are merely a previously released scene now shown at a wider crop or via another camera.
-Perhaps two gals old enough to have bought a beta tape. The rest are just past legal age.
-The home page naviagation links are squashed into a small area. I clicked into wrong sections thru out my m'ship.
-Its a one-trick pony site: the desire to film big O's reaches something not far from mania.
-Concolourous sets.
Bottom Line:
-This is one of the tiny number of porn sites whose members aren't 98% male. Don't write that your sexy wife is devoted to Abbeywinters.com or the latest female conquest really grooves to your old downloads of Jeanna Fine fuck-fests. No, I'm guessing this is one of a very few with a sizable m'ship of single females who tracked it down on their own accord. Others would be adultfriendfinder.com and, maybe, hegre-art.com
-If your idea of perfect porn is non-plot fucking conducted at breakneck speed, hup-two-three-four! then you won't incur an erection. If you prefer women being fucked into the floorboards, so hard she ends up with a nosebleed or concussion, this site won't raise your blood pressure.
-A reminder of what gets many women off: fully half don't finger themselves internally, the dildos are small-ish, I don't recall any anal probing. Judging by the twitches and moaning, any desire for cock is a passing velleity compared to the yearning for mons venus stimulation. Gentlemen, take notice.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Thought the price was reasonable and lured me in the first time.
I came back a second time about 1 year later and updates are regular (daily actually)
The little window that informs me about upcoming updates.
The difference in scenes...some are outdoors and very "sneaky."
Download speeds are good.
Cons:
Like other reviews, the close facial view during the orgasm, I would like to see the full view sometimes.
Sometimes the reshoots or re-edited shoots, aren't all the much better than the original. AND sometimes...they are.
Very few women of color...the ones here are WOW!
Bottom Line:
If you enjoy the looks and sounds of a women during orgasm...this site is great. The price makes it reasonable. The site updates daily, so there is no question on "when?"
The ladies are not porn stars, so there is the uniqueness of the site. Just every day ladies being willing to allow us to see a very intimate and sexy moment.
I will be returning in the future and am confident I will be satisfied.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Was recommened by a Sex Psychologist friend, highly erotic site
- Nearly 800 videos, res is good over 600 on high end, but bitrate is a bit jumpy at 700k on my machine.
- Videos are downloadable in full scenes
- Real women, not models, most are average to above average in looks which is important (will explain)
- Definitely real, probably the most realistic porn site on the internet that I have seen
Cons:
- No photos
- Very little nudity (will explain in BL)
- Average girls can become boring to look at, especially for $30 a month
- Borders on mind-numbingly repititive, get the feeling of seen one, seen them all.
- Sometimes tries to become very artsy with the settings, lighting, example white lace wrapped around the women in a very dark room.
Bottom Line:
A Sex Psychologist, or Therapist for you Politically Correct types that believe the Sex Organs have not a brain of their own, recommended this site to me as a highly erotic site.
The first thing you should know is that the majority of these videos do not show much more than breasts and some don't even show that. Instead, the focus is on the woman's face as she masturbates. The moans are excellent if you like to hear the moaning, racing breathing patterns, this is erotic. But the effect wore off very fast for me. After 3 videos I was saying, "Come on camera, move down".
The women look to range in age from 18 to probably mid-30s. Most are pretty enough or cute enough. But lets face it, not all pretty women make the most desirable faces during masturbation and especially in orgasm. If I could ever recommend anything to the webmaster it would be to make the last 30 seconds more of a full body shot even if at a distance. The body shaking, full body orgasms are not on here since you can't see the whole body. In my opinion this detracts a great deal from the erotic nature of the videos.
Video quality is about all there is to comment on, the resolution is very good, but that bitrate on a high end computer is stuttering a little. Which you can imagine hurts the erotic nature as well. This isn't Eve Angel or Sophie Moone quality masturbation, but it does have a place for those who maybe want to see something different and original. Recommended for those people only!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
As basic as you can get with models of all varieties. Not all you want to watch but many are incredibly sexy. Also interesting to spot models from the other Aussie sites. An unfussy, uncomplicated site with, no doubt, genuine orgasms
Cons:
Would like better lighting on the models which seems to be happening. And maybe more on the different camera angles
Bottom Line:
A very erotic site. Updated daily - you don't always like the latest model but as a genre it works so well. I would like to see more of the models in outdoors shoots. And please keep male partners out of it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is a hard site not to like. It features natural women exploring their bodies in erotic settings, and the orgasms -- thank goodness -- are real and powerful. Categories include "Solo," "Friends" (where the actress is joined by others), "Lubrications" (interviews) and "Homemade." The full collection of each model's videos on the site are listed when you're watching one of her scenes (in the event you wish to sample another ... and another). This site can be VERY erotic.
Cons:
The content is so consistent, it can be, at times, too predictable and not as arousing. Some will find too many of the women unappealing to their tastes (these are not glamour models), and the scenes may not be exciting enough for some (there are a couple of camera angles for each shoot, and that's it).
Bottom Line:
For a limited amount of time, this site can be a welcome respite from other porn sites, given that its sole reason for existence is the celebration of women masturbating. It is well worth a month's subscription fee to experience its unique qualities.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Original and stylish content
+ Natural women in natural settings
+ Decent update schedule - including a countdown timer to the next update
+ Nicely designed site despite the lack of a model index
Cons:
- Video quality does vary, but even the worst of 'em aren't TOO bad.
- Seems to be an on again, off again problem with the use of download managers, although it's not much of a problem if you have broadband. Some days there is a message while using Free Download Manager that their server doesn't allow resuming stopped downloads (On the IFM forum, one of their admins says that issue is being addressed)
- No model index
Bottom Line:
I guess my score for this site reflects my appreciation of amateurs. It struck me that this site could easily be called "Erotic Art". As a newer site, I could also see this as one of those that you leave for a while, then join again later as the content builds. I'll definitely come back to this one!
Follow-Up:
Sad to say I have to knock my score down for this site. With not enough room here for the reasons, see my comment on the right.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- The content and concept are original.
- The masturbation scenes have a genuine and personal feel that is erotic and intimate and damn hot!
- The girls featured are natural, enthusiastic and seem to be playing as much for themselves as the person watching.
Cons:
- Video quality is not fantastic. The lighting is often dim and the camera angles are not the most engaging. I know it's all about mood, but it would be nice to see also.
- Having both nude and non-nude content can make it frustrating when you're waiting several days for an update only to get something tamer than you'd hoped.
- Content does not vary, and don't expect it to.
Bottom Line:
Still a relatively new site, IFM does not have a heap of content but it has been growing fast. And the true test: Does it have enough content for a month's membership? The answer: Yes, and more for those who enjoy the unique concept and the fresh, naughty amateur nature of the girls.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
