Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Not to be judgmental, and not to break any rules here, but…
1-19 of 19 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

05-07-11  12:21pm - 4885 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I’m into a Videobox membership and every time a new Monica Mattos scene is posted there are a bunch of user comments that say that she once ummmm… (putting on lawyer voice) engaged in an act of equine fellatio. Coming from a guy who likes girl-girl milk enema scenes, I realize that anything I say about this will properly trigger warnings about those of us who live in glass houses and all, but seriously, ewwwww!!!!

So I’m curious; has anyone seen this? I won’t judge you, but I’m just having a hard time thinking that it could be even remotely arousing. The only way I can see such a scene generating any interest would be in the shock value. (As an aside, would that area of interest actually have porn stars? “Have you seen the latest video starring Trigger and Mr. Ed? Awesome, man!” Then again, I think I might actually have a better shot at sitting through a Trigger movie than one of Shorty Mac’s self-indulgent loads of shit.)

And while I’m on the topic, I might be the last person on the planet who hasn’t seen “Two Girls One Cup.” But then again, I’m probably the last person on the planet who hasn’t seen any of the Fast and Furious movies. I’d have a tough choice if forced to choose.

So maybe what I’m getting at is the kind of stuff I mentioned above is what gives porn a bad name. Right-wing religious nuts see all porn as bestiality and poop when that’s just a fringe niche. Porn can lovingly and sensually portray two loving female adults who pour milk into each other rectums and then squirt it at each other. What could be more wholesome than that?

05-07-11  01:19pm - 4885 days #2
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Hopefully, it'll go without saying but ...

Please, don't post links to bestiality.
Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

05-07-11  03:39pm - 4885 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


Hopefully, it'll go without saying but ...

Please, don't post links to bestiality.



You don't have to ask twice on that one. I think the topic is legitimate, but I definitely wanted to tread lightly. I'm actually surprised that this kind of stuff is available. It seems pretty weird to me. (And I've just broken my promise to not be judgmental...)

05-07-11  04:13pm - 4885 days #4
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
While my tastes do verge on the extreme I have watched some, even by my standards, weird shit in my time. I think its quite comforting to watch some of the more, shall we say, avant-garde stuff and remain completely unaroused. I guess that either means there is more room for me to spiral into depravity or I do have some limits of taste and decency. I think its the latter. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa
Edited on May 07, 2011, 04:39pm

05-07-11  04:14pm - 4885 days #5
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I'm not a lawyer, and don't know much about porn and the law.
But I think that bestiality, at least regarding US laws, is illegal.
I don't know how that would be treated outside the US.
I also don't know if there would be a distinction between visual porn (photos and videos) and written porn.
But my impression is that bestiality is illegal in the US.
I think it would be possibly dangerous to have any bestiality porn on your PC. The same way it would be dangerous to have any child porn on your PC.

05-07-11  05:28pm - 4885 days #6
BenThruston (0)
Active User

Posts: 16
Registered: Nov 11, '10
Location: USA
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:

So I�m curious; has anyone seen this? I won�t judge you, but I�m just having a hard time thinking that it could be even remotely arousing. The only way I can see such a scene generating any interest would be in the shock value. (As an aside, would that area of interest actually have porn stars? �Have you seen the latest video starring Trigger and Mr. Ed? Awesome, man!� Then again, I think I might actually have a better shot at sitting through a Trigger movie than one of Shorty Mac�s self-indulgent loads of shit.)


Taboo stuff, lol, but seen some stuff like that back in the height of file sharing days. No idea if I saw that particular vid, but seen some with that. Dog too, whole 9 there. Years ago though, don't think I still have any of that stuff anymore, more girl/dog though.

Far as it being arousing, depends on how good looking the chick is and how "into it" she is like pretty much any other form of porn. Pornstars...think there were some "names" there, but wasn't that big into it and haven't dabbled there in years.

And Right-wing religious nuts use bestiality and scat porn as a weapon against the industry because of your post as an example..it's one of few forms of porn that can still throw people for a loop. Shock value as you put it that can get people on their side. Sure milk enemas were that way at one point (probably kept out of the US along w/ Euro fisting vids once upon a time)

05-07-11  06:09pm - 4885 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I've never seen the Monica scene but I heard about it.
A friend of mine once sent me a small 10 seconds video of something similar. It's mostly shocking and a somewhat disturbing to watch but somehow less than scatology. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-07-11  07:19pm - 4885 days #8
Doug62 (0)
Disabled User

Posts: 19
Registered: May 08, '07
You may want to look at
Zoophilia and the Law
on Wikipedia.

05-09-11  05:38pm - 4883 days #9
jberryl69 (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,000
Registered: Nov 27, '10
Location: neverland
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


You don't have to ask twice on that one. I think the topic is legitimate, but I definitely wanted to tread lightly. I'm actually surprised that this kind of stuff is available. It seems pretty weird to me. (And I've just broken my promise to not be judgmental...)


I think to post how something strikes you is not being judgmental RA - it's how u feel. If it ain't grits, it must be a Yankee.

If you're going to lay her head over the pool table and fuck her throat, get your fucking hand off her throat!

05-09-11  05:40pm - 4883 days #10
jberryl69 (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,000
Registered: Nov 27, '10
Location: neverland
idk about a Monica - I've heard the stories but when I lived in Colorado in the early 80s, there were those 25 cent feed the reel shows where Linda Lovelace blew a dog so it makes me wonder when it became illegal? If it ain't grits, it must be a Yankee.

If you're going to lay her head over the pool table and fuck her throat, get your fucking hand off her throat!

05-09-11  10:59pm - 4882 days #11
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Back on Oct. 29th of last year I ran a thread intitled
"can you believe guys are paying for this stuff?"
It was about sites which had their girls berate and humilate you.... incredibly, one has to pay for this.

The scene I came across that prompted my thread was so vitriolic that I posted a detailed discription.
The thread drew a heavy response, with people coming forth posting all kinds of interesting stuff.
But the post that reeeeeally got my attention, was written by a guy who belonged to an order whose members dined on each other's scat......
That flat blew my mind!

This was so absurdly far-out to me that I wouldn't believe it, and I gave the guy a piece of my mind for what appeared to me as being a bate. The exchange then that followed between us is something you might find worth your while by going back and checking it out.
I'm still not convinced anybody ....sane or insane, or however otherwise so messed up in their head, that they'll eat excrement......can anybody else out there tell me I'm wrong?

05-10-11  01:35am - 4882 days #12
anyonebutme (0)
Active User



Posts: 294
Registered: Aug 23, '09
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:

Right-wing religious nuts see all porn as bestiality and poop when that's just a fringe niche.


I thought I read the thread topic as Not to be judgmental

05-11-11  04:50pm - 4881 days #13
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


I'm still not convinced anybody ....sane or insane, or however otherwise so messed up in their head, that they'll eat excrement......can anybody else out there tell me I'm wrong?


Good God, I hope this is just another urban myth. Stuff like this make my interests seem tame.

05-11-11  04:55pm - 4881 days #14
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by anyonebutme:


I thought I read the thread topic as Not to be judgmental


Oops! You're right. Guilty as charged. Or maybe not...

... to be completely fair, I doubt the people who are into very bizarre sexual practices involving animals want to impose that on us. I don't think that I'm being judgmental when I say that I'm worried that people like the Late Jerry Falwell would want to take away my right to watch even tame porn.

05-12-11  10:52am - 4880 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Oops! You're right. Guilty as charged. Or maybe not...

... to be completely fair, I doubt the people who are into very bizarre sexual practices involving animals want to impose that on us. I don't think that I'm being judgmental when I say that I'm worried that people like the Late Jerry Falwell would want to take away my right to watch even tame porn.


This is just a purely personal opinion but I think the danger would not come so much from the religious right. They learned their lesson about people living in glass houses from Jim Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart et al. At least I hope they did.

I think it more likely that an attack on porn would come from the feminist extreme left who believe that women are being objectified through porn.

There are some in the feminist camp who recognize that porn actresses wield the power in most cases and that porn can be an enabler for them.

Sadly, however, there are also cases of exploitation of young women by unscrupulous men, and this is where the rest of the feminists would jump on the anti-porn bandwagon if the subject of banning it would come up again.

But as I said, it's more instinct with me rather than something I could back with solid facts.

05-13-11  12:43am - 4879 days #16
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Good God, I hope this is just another urban myth. Stuff like this make my interests seem tame.


Then don't you hope it's true? Then you won't have anything to feel guilty about concerning your porn habit--that's gotta help with the spouse. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-13-11  01:15am - 4879 days #17
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by messmer:


I think it more likely that an attack on porn would come from the feminist extreme left who believe that women are being objectified through porn.

There are some in the feminist camp who recognize that porn actresses wield the power in most cases and that porn can be an enabler for them.

Sadly, however, there are also cases of exploitation of young women by unscrupulous men, and this is where the rest of the feminists would jump on the anti-porn bandwagon if the subject of banning it would come up again.


The problem with feminists attacking porn because they feel women are being exploited is that they are attacking a symptom and not the problem (assuming there is a real problem here). As I discussed in my reply to rearadmiral's recent thread on why women get into porn, easy money and lack of opportunity draw them in, so simply outlawing porn would not be doing them any favors, and would in fact be making it worse by eliminating one more job that requires basically no education or experience.

I'm not condoning exploiting young, naive, and inexperienced women who are in porn but if feminists really wanted to do something they would support full legalization with regulation instead of total elimination. Zero tolerance is zero thinking. But of course if this conflicts with their worldview then they would probably tell me to go to hell--and it wouldn't be the first time!

Sadly I believe the Religious Right would be the ones reigning in porn, and this isn't just because of my own prejudices. Looking at the erosion of Roe v. Wade in recent years proves they have the ability to enact or at least strengthen laws that further their theocratic goals for America. Abortion may seem far off from porn but they are both battles in the so-called "culture wars" that give a boner to the far right, who are unfortunately taking over the Republican Party. Despite the economic problems I'm betting bullshit cultural issues will still be dragged out for the upcoming presidential election.

I'm not putting down genuine conservatives here, because in the U.S. they have been marginalized by this strange, creepy, but very powerful minority of anti-intellectuals who have an odd view of what exactly "liberty" entails (and free speech isn't part of it). The end result is forcing candidates to bend over backwards to prove their faith and the dredging up of nonissues that become less and less important as the country progresses socially (and younger voters replace past generations). "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

05-13-11  12:20pm - 4879 days #18
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Then don't you hope it's true? Then you won't have anything to feel guilty about concerning your porn habit--that's gotta help with the spouse.


Good point! I can just imagine how my argument would go: "But Dear, in my 6 terabytes of videos and pictures of young lasses getting every hole pummelled, at least no one eats poop."

Hmmm... she might just buy that.

05-13-11  12:21pm - 4879 days #19
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


This is just a purely personal opinion but I think the danger would not come so much from the religious right. They learned their lesson about people living in glass houses from Jim Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart et al. At least I hope they did.

I think it more likely that an attack on porn would come from the feminist extreme left who believe that women are being objectified through porn.

There are some in the feminist camp who recognize that porn actresses wield the power in most cases and that porn can be an enabler for them.

Sadly, however, there are also cases of exploitation of young women by unscrupulous men, and this is where the rest of the feminists would jump on the anti-porn bandwagon if the subject of banning it would come up again.

But as I said, it's more instinct with me rather than something I could back with solid facts.


You might be right about the Christian fundies, but I wouldn't count them out just yet. They're largely ineffective politically, but if a politician wants to throw them a bone then porn might be an easy target.

1-19 of 19 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.