|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » What’s so wrong with letting natural beauty just be natural? |
| 1-17 of 17 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 08-06-11 07:03am - 4887 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I’m pretty sure this has been discussed a bit, but I have a new reason to dislike the way porn directors ‘tart up’ the models. I was watching some of my older stuff a couple of nights ago and I watched a scene from Ass Smoothie with Allison Pierce. I’m a fan of hers and usually download anything that she’s in. Like most porn, she’s usually got heavy makeup and some over-the-top porn-girl outfit on so you can’t really get a sense of her natural look. But most of the Ass Smoothie scene is her sitting on the floor being interviewed while wearing normal street clothes and with normal makeup on, and she’s really naturally beautiful. So I re-watched many of the scenes I have of her and was disappointed that none of them allow that natural beauty to shine through. So what’s with the need for the super-porn-slut look? I’m sure I’m not the only person who prefers the natural look. I’m excluding fake breasts because that’s a whole other area of discussion. I’m talking mostly about clothes and makeup. And while I’m on the topic, another pet peeve, especially where the model is in street clothes, is the editor cutting the girl undressing or being undressed. That’s part of the fucking fantasy!!!!! Leave it in please!!!! I can’t be alone on this either… | |
|
||
| 08-06-11 07:47am - 4887 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I guess perverts with an appreciation of natural beauty are an endangered species, like the unicorn. Certainly don't find many porn directors who bother looking for that quality. You get two extremes: glamor, or gonzo. (I'm thinking of gonzo as the "just shoot it, without any makeup or trying to make the model look good or lovely", even if that's not really what gonzo is.) Personal taste is just that. What appeals to one person can be a turn-off for someone else. I think Twistys, DDF and a bunch of other sites overdo the makeup, but that's a conscious decision on their part: they are going for a "sophisticated", "slutty" look. And that's a popular style. I like Metart much more: they try to make the models look better, but usually without glopping on a ton of makeup. | |
|
||
| 08-06-11 08:35am - 4887 days | #3 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
It's not very surprising that many directors tart up their models since they can't film a decent sex scene in the first place so why should we be surprised that all they know is how to make them look like cheap hookers (my appologies to cheap hookers) instead of allowing for their natural beauty to shine. of course the other side of the coin is that many models are not very good looking without makeup. I'm not talking about any physical defect but actual bad skin. That's the one thing that's bad about HD. Some models just have a less than desireable skin. I think that cameron Diaz is a good example of a girl that's beautiful from afar but is less than beautiful when seen from upclose. Now a good meakup artist could apply proper makeup to the model prior to her scene but since most studios do gonzo porn then why spend money on a makeup artist for that. I have a bigger problem with the girls and makeup in porn. I would much prefer that they applied the makeup to their body rather than their faces. How many videos have I seen where the girl is wearing different levels of makeup on her face but none on her backside or the area around her vagina. All you can see are razor burns, pimples, zits, skin blemishes, skin abbrasions and on rare ocasions small wounds. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 08-06-11 10:02am - 4887 days | #4 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Yep, your complaint has been mine as well, rearadmiral. That last paragraph especially touches a nerve with me because I daily curse the editors who take out the getting undressed of the girl. This would be so much better than twenty minutes of uninterrupted sex. Leave the undressing in and cut down on the various sex acts by five minutes and everyone would be happy, including the male performers.  | |
|
||
| 08-06-11 10:10am - 4887 days | #5 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I'm with you guys (and agree with the above). Nothing beats simple, elegant beauty. And don't mind if some extra dollyworks get into the picture for effects every now and then (as with some DDF material), though I wouldn't get much of it myself (the porn content, I mean). For the most part, there's no need to make our natural lovelies look like WalMart shoppers in the midwestern United States. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 08-06-11 10:14am - 4887 days | #6 | |
|
Capn (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,740 Registered: Sep 05, '09 Location: Near the Beer! |
Always been a fan of natural ladies. Agree on leaving the strip in too. It can be a very erotic part of the build up if performed & captured well. Cap'n.  Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU AwardHilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award ( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/ Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder! | |
|
||
| 08-06-11 11:17am - 4887 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree. Most often when I watch porn I spend more time watching the set up and the undressing. I'll frequently skip the sex. It's the possibility of seeing the naughty bits that is a turn on for me, not necessarily actually seeing the naughty bits. Though I certainly have nothing against seeing the naughty bits. Don't get me wrong. | |
|
||
| 08-06-11 06:55pm - 4887 days | #8 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
We've been discussing the present day absence of the "tease factor" quite a few times, rearadmiral. I'm with you, I love the teasing that comes with a leisurely undressing to get ready for the main event. Trouble is, too many people nowadays suffer from ADD and it is not certain if they would stay with a video if they had to wait too long for the "good stuff!" I know that many of them would do a fast forward through a strip sequence because I've seen too many comments to that effect over the years by the younger crowd. | |
|
||
| 08-07-11 01:13am - 4887 days | #9 | |
|
Capn (0)
Active User Posts: 1,740 Registered: Sep 05, '09 Location: Near the Beer! |
IMO that is wasting the most erotic portion.  Cap'n.  Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU AwardHilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award ( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/ Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder! | |
|
||
| 08-07-11 09:11am - 4886 days | #10 | |
|
elephant (0)
Active User  Posts: 585 Registered: Jan 11, '07 |
Natural all the way with me too, never liked the glammed up look, ruins and cheapens a girl's looks usually, lezcuties I love the look of the girls in these movies and then lezhoneys is not so much what I like, too glam. If you see them girls with little or no makeup they look miles better in my opinion. But as stated natural and glam have their followers. That said though I did watch Anais in one of Suze Randall's I think it was and she was all glammed up but with her it worked and was a really hot scene. I guess its the quality of the makeup departments, some movie companies don't do it right and over use makeup in my opinion. "Women are like tricks by sleight of hand, Which, to admire, we should not understand." WILLIAM CONGREVE Edited on Aug 07, 2011, 09:59am | |
|
||
| 08-08-11 02:19am - 4885 days | #11 | |
|
hotdude113 (0)
Active User Posts: 10 Registered: Aug 05, '11 Location: USA |
That is the way it is nowadays. They use so much makeup because that is what they think is HOT. Which is not by the way. I've read somewhere that a Korean girl wears her makeup even in her sleep and she doesn't take them off. Dang. An inventor is simply a fellow who doesn’t take his education too seriously. —Charles F. Kettering | |
|
||
| 09-15-11 11:40am - 4847 days | #19 | |
|
Capn (0)
Active User Posts: 1,740 Registered: Sep 05, '09 Location: Near the Beer! |
I think a lot of it may be related to confidence issues. Cap'n.  Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU AwardHilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award ( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/ Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder! | |
|
||
| 09-15-11 02:28pm - 4847 days | #20 | |
|
graymane (0)
Suspended  Posts: 1,411 Registered: Feb 20, '10 Location: Virginia |
I think we ought to simply get them outta bed mornings, sans the cosmetics and immediately have them transported onto the set, and let the cameras roll. I slightly prefer the untouched natural look, because in the true sense of the words, "what you see is who I am... and what I am is what you get."  | |
|
||
| 09-15-11 05:55pm - 4847 days | #21 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Don't you think we should let them take a shower first, graymane?. I even vote that we let them brush their hair afore they go performing! | |
|
||
| 09-16-11 07:47am - 4846 days | #22 | |
|
Capn (0)
Active User Posts: 1,740 Registered: Sep 05, '09 Location: Near the Beer! |
I would imagine you would get the reaction. '....but I feel naked & exposed without my makeup!' To which I would reply. 'Yes, that is the whole point!'  Cap'n.  Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU AwardHilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award ( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/ Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder! | |
|
||
| 09-16-11 11:01pm - 4846 days | #23 | |
|
graymane (0)
Suspended Posts: 1,411 Registered: Feb 20, '10 Location: Virginia |
Ok, sir messmer.....good point ....and well taken. Shower's in and so is brushing her bush. | |
|
||
| 10-14-11 04:06pm - 4818 days | #25 | |
|
monty4321 (0)
Active User Posts: 9 Registered: Jul 17, '11 |
Yes - i am not alone either. I like natural all the way. A little make up on some of the less attractive ones is not too bad though. But only a little make-up. But natural with no make up is by far the best. | |
|
||
| 1-17 of 17 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
