|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » How important is the Money Shot to pornographic films? |
| 1-5 of 5 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 08-28-15 02:01pm - 3404 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Pyrenees (0)
Active User  Posts: 153 Registered: Feb 25, '15 Location: USA |
How important is the Money Shot to pornographic films? For the purposes of this discussion let's agree that in pornography the 'money shot' is typically the moment when a male climaxes and ejaculates in the general direction of the females body (Usually a facial). But personally how important is the money shot to you? When I watch a film if a scene between and male and female ends with no money shot I feel like I was ripped off. My favorite money shot is the Facial followed by Cream Pie and Anal Cream Pie. Personally I feel like the money shot is necessary to a good scene. In the very first pornographic film (Which you can find on Xhamster, but I will not link because of rules) A L'Ecu d'Or ou la bonne auberge, there is a threesome Boy Girl Girl that takes place in a inn. This film is from 1908 and while it is certainly not the first every porno it is the first one that I can prove to you exists. We have no access to earlier works however there is strong evidence they exist in France. Notice the first porno ends with a money shot on the vagina/upper vagina of the woman who was in reverse cowgirl. I would argue that from the very start directors knew what the audience wanted to see. This film is only 10 minutes long and yet we have a threesome, one with big breasts, deep throat, multiple positions and a money shot. Which brings me to the all important questions. 1) Are money shots important in pornos? 2) What are your favorite money shots? 3) Would you join a porno video website with no money shots? Here is a bonus for a fellow reviewer. The very first porno with anal sex was filmed in 1910 it is German and it was called Am Abend! 1Ti 6:17 Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy; | |
|
||
| 08-29-15 06:13am - 3403 days | #2 | |
|
Thomas20 (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 27, '09 Location: England |
1. Vital 2. Face 3. Absolutely not ! T20. | |
|
||
| 08-29-15 07:05am - 3403 days | #3 | |
|
elephant (0)
Active User  Posts: 585 Registered: Jan 11, '07 |
1. Essential to me. 2. Top is anal cream pie with another girl underneath to catch it in her mouth then cum swapping. Next is face plastered by another girl licking it off and cum swapping. Then facial scooped into her mouth and swallowing. 3. Not if it was a sex site, I have in the past obviously with solo stuff. "Women are like tricks by sleight of hand, Which, to admire, we should not understand." WILLIAM CONGREVE | |
|
||
| 08-31-15 07:15am - 3401 days | #4 | |
|
Pyrenees (0)
Active User Posts: 153 Registered: Feb 25, '15 Location: USA |
This is going to sound weird (Because I am a strait man) but I totally agree with your #2 favorite money shot. I like the male pornstars that produce a unbelievable amount of thick semen. I forget his name (I think Nikko Knight)but there was a large pornstar about 15 years ago who said in a behind the scenes interview he had a special diet that produced those massive man loads. Seeing women share the load is one of the hottest things in porn. It is probably why I like Jules Jordan so much. It is too bad his website is trash. I think the male pornstar is just as important as the female pornstar. I miss the old days where there were funny guys who could have been one of us. Now they are all male models who never say a word and you do not see much of. A scene is so much hotter when both the actors and actresses set it up with good dialog and roleplay. This is just my opinion. I own a famous Kagney Lynn Karter scene where I swear the guy does not have a money shot. They do not even show penetration. But what makes it a keeper is the frontal view doggy style position. I could never get rid of that scene. But it is one of the few non money shot scenes I have ever appreciated. 1Ti 6:17 Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy; Edited on Aug 31, 2015, 07:26am | |
|
||
| 08-31-15 10:55am - 3401 days | #5 | |
|
MikeC
PornUsers Staff  Posts: 102 Registered: Jul 03, '15 |
I agree with the change in the stereotypical male model, but I actually think in some ways its for the better. In the 90s, most of the big name pornstars (Randy West, TT Boy, Peter North, etc) where super tanned, well-built guys who were quite alpha and while they were funny at times you got an air of arrogance towards the audience that you don't see as much anymore. The 00s had more humor in its porn (The MILF Hunter and Preston jump to mind as guys who were legitimately funny at times), but it also had a Jock/Bro mentality that works for some people and turns off others. I think that's one of the many reasons why James Deen has broken through as THE male pornstar for a generation; he is unpretentious and relatable. He, and the newer generation of male pornstars, are also visibly younger than the super-tanned, perfectly coiffed pornstars of the past. And, as higher percentages of women began watching porn, the more the look of the male performer has changed from the swarthy male stripper of yore to guys that real women actually want to fuck. | |
|
||
| 1-5 of 5 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
