|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » Online porn crackdown announced in UK |
| 1-14 of 14 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 12-03-14 02:53pm - 3672 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User  Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Online porn crackdown announced in UK Porn-mageddon is finally here in the UK, at least for those who like the more explicit content that makes online porn so great. The ban applies to content that is too extreme to be classified as R18 by the British Board of Film Censors and includes: Spanking Caning Penetration by any object "associated with violence" Physical or verbal abuse Urolagnia / watersports Role playing as non-adults Physical restraint Humiliation Female ejaculation Strangulation Facesitting Fisting Here are the links to the articles where this was announced today: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/a-l...uk-porn-9897174.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/por...he-most-9900591.html I can go on about this, but time is short, so I will get to the point. If you have a UK site in mind that features this content and you are considering to join, then join now, because it's future may be measured in days. I saw this coming over a year ago, so I made a project of covering all UK sites that feature peeing, and I believe that I am done. Here is the list that I have arrived at: uk-flashers.com misshybrid.com angellongxxx.com theenglishmansion.com (hosted in Amsterdam and incorporated in Vancouver, but maybe some ties to UK) - only one I haven't covered yet got2pee.com glimpse-it.com (hosted in US, but still has UK ties) Hightide videos - too expensive to cover (warning also #2) Skymouse sites (wettingherpanties.com, etc) european-femdom.com needapee.com publicnudesluts.com (shot in Russia, but seems to be owned by a UK company) justinesbedroom.com (got it before it closed) watersportssluts.com (got it before the entire HardGlam.com network went down) xamateurs.co.uk crazypeegirls.com peesearch.com Any content hosted in the UK is fair game for take down. Any content owned by a UK citizen is fair game for take down, even if hosted abroad. The UK agency ATVOD can and has leveraged UK ties of international companies to attempt to have content and sites removed. To clarify things, possession of this content is still legal, it's just the online distribution that has been banned. Also, to clarify the watersports thing, it seems that the words "watersports" and "urolagnia" apply only to peeing on others and drinking pee, so solo peeing should still be allowed. Now, I know everyone is going to be outraged to hear this. I am too, because the UK has given us some of the best sites over the years. I would like to ask your help with one thing. I am done downloading the content from almost all of the UK sites that feature peeing, at least those that I know of, and I know of about 300 sites that feature peeing online. My goal is to download the content from all of them before the curtain drops. Please look over my list, and if you can think of any UK sites that feature peeing content that are not listed, please reply, and I will join immediately and be extremely grateful. I have not searched for UK sites featuring female ejaculation, so if you can think of any of those, please post them. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 12-03-14 04:06pm - 3672 days | #2 | |
|
biker (0)
Active User  Posts: 632 Registered: May 03, '08 Location: milwaukee, wi |
Slowly back to the dark ages. Step by step, until we have tape covering our eyes, ears, and mouth. Warning Will Robinson | |
|
||
| 12-03-14 04:21pm - 3671 days | #3 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Somehow I'm reminded of that song "Mary Long" by Deep Purple. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 12-05-14 09:28am - 3670 days | #4 | |
|
Thomas20 (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 27, '09 Location: England |
Not that those are my bag but how is, for example, female ejaculation (if such as thing exists) extreme. Does no humiliation mean an end to CFNM sites or does it depend on the gender of the person in charge in the scene. Will the same rules apply to hollywood films ? They will have to ban the railway children. | |
|
||
| 12-05-14 01:54pm - 3670 days | #5 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
This list looks pretty random in that you can allow double anal penetration gang bangs but not allow someone to rub their butt in someone's face for a few seconds or permit a 40 year old milf in a cheerleader outfit to say "I'm just a young teen girl". Obviously a list put together by bureaucrats who would probably find the pinup girls of the 1940's very risque. As usual, the case for censorship is the "protection of children" which is rather stupid in that kids aren't even supposed to have access to porn sites. Of course, everyone knows that once any impressionable young person watches a bdsm scene you know they're immediately going to assume that's they only way they're ever going to have sex the rest of their lives ("Bring out the gimp") I've made the point numerous times here in the forum that the next wave of porn censorship will not be lead by social conservatives who want to ban all porn but rather under the headline act of protecting kids. Yet kids can still watch incredibly horrific acts of violence, listen to musicians go on about killing whoever for whatever trivial reason (don't even think of playing those heavy metal music l.p.'s backwards), and of course read any number of worthless lurid and violent crap postings on the web. In other words, when they say it's about protecting kids it's really only just protecting whatever Of course, all this does is drive otherwise law abiding people to circumvent their own countries laws by connecting with foreign servers, using false proxy addresses and other gimics any kid could tell you how to do. In the end, the only people who win are the same bunch of bureaucrats who will get to hire more bureaucrats to keep a careful on the internet and watch extreme porn all day while spending even more government money on enforcing laws that don't mean squat at the end of the day. Guess all you Brits better buckle down for the day when this is about as extreme as internet porn will get. | |
|
||
| 12-06-14 05:23pm - 3668 days | #6 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^Actually if you look at that list than I think anything above midcore type porn can be something a site owner might be prosecuted. I think a mid-level prosecutor would not have a too hard a time proving that a double penetration is akin to physical violence. After all the people who would be expected to accept that are probably people who do not watch that type of porn. In fact I think this is an amazingly wicked endeavor on the part of the moral right in the UK because I daresay you will be hard pressed to find one porn producer who hasn`t at least one or more of these types of content in his movies. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 12-06-14 06:08pm - 3668 days | #7 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
My friends in the UK tell me that decades ago, before the internet, the Obscene Publications Act was very difficult to enforce on watersports, because even then, juries would overwhelmingly fail to conclude that it corrupts and depraves those who enjoy it. Not sure about DP, but maybe the same story if brought before a jury. This new development is very underhanded though, because it bypasses trial before a jury, it enshrines outdated obscenity guidelines and applies them to modern internet porn, with no evidence that the guidelines accomplish anything, and meanwhile British society that has long since moved beyond these prudish tastes. There is now a petition at none other than change.org to protest against these guidelines. Please consider signing, even if you are not from the UK, because we are all affected. https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-m...ornography-amsr-2014 Also, I think this is going to blow up in the face of Cameron and the MP's who back it. In the year 2014, how is it okay for a woman to eat a man's cum, but banned for a man to eat a woman's cum in a female ejaculation scene? Feminists are already gearing up to have a field day with this. Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. | |
|
||
| 12-07-14 09:18am - 3668 days | #8 | |
|
Thomas20 (0)
Active User Posts: 60 Registered: Dec 27, '09 Location: England |
I am not a fan of fox hunting but objected strongly to the labour government banning it with no real mandate. I'm not a smoker but I oppose the idea of banning it in outside or in your own car, which could happen under a conservative government.Again with no real mandate from the public. Greed and selfishness know no political boundaries and my view was that if they can cull these things that have been done for hundreds of years in one fell swoop with no consultation then sooner or later it would be something I liked that got it. As I say, I'm not a great fan of the items in the list about but it's quite wrong. | |
|
||
| 12-07-14 05:03pm - 3667 days | #9 | |
|
graymane (0)
Suspended  Posts: 1,411 Registered: Feb 20, '10 Location: Virginia |
Maybe the UK has a proper agenda for all this ..... I would like to believe their aim is to bring porn -- as it exist today -- back to some form of "normalcy." By that I mean going after the practice of male partners stepping over the line of conventual sex by putting the "hurt" on the opposite gender (slapping, pinching, verbal attacks, spitting,) just to name a few kinds of abuse they (pay-porn) are cashing-in on from this growing genera , | |
|
||
| 12-08-14 05:19pm - 3666 days | #10 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
My guess is that it's listed so as to cover what could possibly--and, let's admit, in many cases is--just peeing. I thought watersports had already been banned years ago, and "female ejaculation" was a grey area (not literally, of course; it's at most slightly milky...  ).Here's the kicker from the article in what the real result will be: "While the measures won't stop people from watching whatever genre of porn they desire, as video shot abroad can still be viewed, they do impose severe restrictions on content created in the UK, and appear to make no distinction between consensual and non-consensual practices between adults." (My emphasis.) You can't get rid of this stuff, so people will just look elsewhere for their kinky jollies, and most of continental Europe will be more than happy to fulfill it. Still, sad to see watersports, female ejaculation, and fisting banned--those are like my trifecta of great content.  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-09-14 05:43am - 3666 days | #11 | |
|
AWpress (0)
Active Webmaster  Posts: 118 Registered: Nov 20, '12 Location: The Netherlands |
This is exactly their agenda, and as well intentioned as it may be, regulating erotica to fit within prescibed 'healthy' boundaries implicity rules out divergent erotica as unhealthy. This, I think, is where the issue lies. Erotic play comes in all sorts of flavours, I just don't think it's fair or right to ostracise consensual kinks as deviant, unhealthy, or illegal. Legally endorsed, prescriptivist stances enforcing a paradigm of mainstream sexuality is exactly the same kind of thinking behind the discrimination against LGBT groups- invoking protection of children to outlaw and witch-hunt 'sexual deviants'. Ultimately, all it really comes down to is the insecurity of powerful individuals and dominant subcultures- they fear watersports and homosexuality because they don't understand it, and therefore think it poses some sort of threat to their vanilla heterosexuality. Perhaps simply tolerating diversity entertains the notion that vanilla heterosexuality isn't the one-true-way to enjoy sex. They can't handle it. The grand irony is that all of this does diddly squat to actually put an end to perceived deviant behaviour. Kinks and divergent sexualities still exist, they just go underground, where they become something like a dirty secret. Large sections of the population harbour feelings of guilt and uncleanliness thanks to a narrative of mandatory heretonormativity. Sometimes, the pressure is too much, and people commit suicide. /rant | |
|
||
| 12-09-14 12:29pm - 3666 days | #12 | |
|
graymane (0)
Suspended Posts: 1,411 Registered: Feb 20, '10 Location: Virginia |
Wow! Mr. AWpress ....Quite a retort. Your erudite capabilities never cease to amaze me. | |
|
||
| 12-12-14 03:38pm - 3663 days | #13 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Add to the list: therubberclinic.com Moving beyond watersports, does anyone know of any UK sites that still feature squirting? Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited on Dec 12, 2014, 03:43pm | |
|
||
| 01-11-15 11:08am - 3633 days | #14 | |
|
LPee23 (0)
Active User Posts: 399 Registered: Jul 14, '13 Location: USA |
Long list of UK sites at BritBird for anyone interested. britbird.com Better to be pissed on, than to be pissed off. Edited by Staff on Jan 11, 2015, 03:00pm (Khan: Direct link URL Edited. Please do not post sites we do not list.) | |
|
||
| 1-14 of 14 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
