|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
rearadmiral (0)
|
| 801-850 of 1453 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 16 | Page 17 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 24 | 29 | 30 | Next Page > |
| 04-30-12 02:00pm - 4619 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
For all of you who, like me, enjoy seeing a shaved lass, this article makes for some interesting reading. It's titled "The New Full-Frontal: Has Pubic Hair in America Gone Extinct?" The short answer is 'yes' if she's under 30, 'not necessarily' if she's over 30. My question is 'how can I make myself young again?' One word of warning: the magazine's website is very busy. Even with a high-speed connection it took time for the ads on the page to load. But that's a small price to pay for a legitimate journal piece about shaved vaginas. Hat tip to a porn buddy and registered lurker here at PU. http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archiv...gone-extinct/249798/ | |
|
||
| 04-29-12 04:53pm - 4620 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm wondering if there is a problem with the files that I'm trying to split. I've tried at least 15 splitters this afternoon and only two seem to work, but I'm not to the point where I trust them yet. I tried FreeVideo Dub and it didn't work either. The slider for indicating where you want to put cut points will only go at the very beginning or the very end. Once I try to move it it jumps to the end. I did try it with a scene instead of a full movie and it seemed to work. I had read that a lot of splitters won't work with files over a certain size so maybe that's the limiting factor for me. Thanks for taking the time to reply. | |
|
||
| 04-29-12 04:49pm - 4620 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Sony Vegas is a bit pricey for what I need to do. Can you recommend some specific software? | |
|
||
| 04-29-12 05:37am - 4621 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I’ve got a bunch of older titles that I downloaded as full movies (the only way they were available). In most of these there are only a scene or two that I really want. Does anyone have any experience with good splitting software? I’ve tried several and had bad luck. Here’s what I’ve tried: Alok Video Splitter – this encoded at a much lower resolution than in the original file and knocked the audio track off kilter. ASFbinwin – this seemed promising but had a really counter-intuitive interface. I would have stuck with it but when I was splitting up my third movie something in the process caused the folder to crash. The only fix was a reboot, delete the folder without opening it, and then another reboot before I could delete the folder from my Recycle Bin. Opening the folder caused immediate problems. (I should point out that the first two movies I split seemed to work fine, but this problem is a deal-breaker. If anyone has any insight as to what this problem is I’d appreciate some advice.) Easy Video Splitter – this little gem appears to have been written by someone in an insane asylum. It’s a free download but then it needs to be registered. The problem is that to access the registration you need a pass code which they email you but there is no place to enter an email address. If the writers screw this up I can’t imagine that the software itself is any better. Boilsoft – seems to work, but it isn’t freeware and it is VERY expensive. 5Star Video Splitter – the user interface on this appears to have been designed in the middle of a fire drill. UVSplitter – another ‘gem’ with a user interface that is counter-intuitive. I couldn’t even get the trial version to work because clicking the ‘output’ button kicked me back to the beginning of the process. Seriously, is software design done in insane asylums these days? 4Leaf Media – I have no reason to think that the paid version will work better than the trial version, and the trial version causes a lot of pixilation. Does anyone have any recommendations? Thanks for the help! | |
|
||
| 04-24-12 02:11pm - 4625 days | #23 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree mostly, and I'm personally loathe to criticize someone for simply saying something, but on a site where we swap useful information about porn I'm thinking that we should steer clear of jokes about rape, incest and child abuse. I'm picturing a blue-haired old lady who stumbles in here and, to her horror, reads reviews and comments about porn sites. Jokes like these might confirm her worst suspicions about us perverts. | |
|
||
| 04-07-12 06:07am - 4643 days | #27 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Good God. I wish I had taken PinkPanther's approach and just stayed away. What a terrible site. In the five minutes I spent reading on the forum board I was convinced that the average member must be a misogynistic nazi with a 2-inch penis. I can't imagine why these people have this attitude. For the record though, there appears to be a "Rear Admiral" who posts on that site. That is most definitely NOT me. | |
|
||
| 04-05-12 08:50am - 4645 days | #21 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Without trying to over-exaggerate here, thank you, thank you, thank you for this information!  I've never been a member at this site (that I can recall, anyway  ) and it probably wouldn't be a first choice, but with this information and the TBP price I suspect I'll be spending some time there over the weekend. | |
|
||
| 03-31-12 11:40am - 4649 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Recently a program on CBC TV ran an episode called “Sext Up Kids” where they explored the worries that kids are being hyper-sexualized due to widely-available porn and mobile devices. I didn’t see the show because, in my opinion, this program seems to sensationalize stories and I wouldn’t expect any better treatment for this topic. I did, however, listen to a lengthy CBC radio segment on the same topic with the documentary’s director. What struck me was how much the panic over the sexting issue sounded a lot like the times a moral panic set in over sex bracelets and rainbow parties. Both of which proved to be entirely false. I’m aware that some sexting does go on, but I highly doubt that it goes on to the extent that the media and soccer moms think it does. I’m convinced that when it comes to how we as adults view kids from 12 to 18 we throw reason and critical thinking out the door and become irrational. (A good article at Cracked implies that maybe we’re just jealous of all the fun these kids are supposedly having. http://www.cracked.com/blog/a-letter-to-...ke-teen-crazes-news/ ) One line of thinking in the radio segment did seem to make sense though, and that’s the possible effects of so much hardcore porn on how young people view sexuality. The comments were made about the things you’d expect to hear about: rough oral sex, DPs, anal sex, gangbangs and group sex. The view was that since all this hardcore porn is so easily available that young people come to see this as normal sex. And maybe this is me being irrational and acting like a soccer mom, but this argument seems to make sense. A lot of PU members are firmly into middle age or older. Think back to the porn you could access, if you could, when you were 15. For me it was soft stuff like Playboy and the times I could get something “harder” like Penthouse were exciting times, indeed. But I was 18 before I saw anything really hardcore, and even then it would be tame by the standards of a lot of current porn. Another thing that struck me was the thought that if this is what young people see as normal sex, how does that impact them? The biggest impact is obviously for girls who may not understand that sex is about their pleasure too, but the prevalence of hardcore porn might make a young girl think that sex has to be a performance and her ‘job’ is to please the boy she’s with. This is in stark contrast to my early sexual experiences in that when the opportunity presented itself I was focused on making things pleasurable for the girl, not out of altruistic goals, but figuring that if it was good for her she’d invite me to do it again and again. Let’s face it, when you’re a teen, regular sex isn’t a goal, it is THE prime directive! I’m not really sure what my point is here, but does anyone else think that so much access to free (stolen) hardcore porn might be warping young minds? And am I just being smug when I think that since I refuse to view pirated porn that I’m not contributing to the problem? | |
|
||
| 03-27-12 05:39pm - 4653 days | #16 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'll probably regret writing this as soon as I hit the 'add reply' button (but why do I worry about sounding sexist on a porn forum), but... I all the pictures of her are of the front. What about dedicated ass-men like me? Not one decent bum shot??? | |
|
||
| 03-27-12 05:36pm - 4653 days | #15 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree 100%! | |
|
||
| 03-27-12 01:33pm - 4653 days | #8 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I din't know that. I always thought beauty contests were creepy, but now knowing that The Donald has his finger in this (figuratively, of course...) it seems ultra-hyper-creepy. | |
|
||
| 03-27-12 09:11am - 4654 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm not asking this as a hypothetical question because this debate is going on in Canada. The "Miss Universe Canada" pageant has kicked out a Vancouver woman named Jenna Talackova who started hormone therapy at 14 and had surgery at 19. She's now 23. The smart-ass in me says she should be excluded from the pageant and sent to my place.  The non-smart-ass in me says that she should be allowed to compete. She says she knew from an early age that she was a girl, and at 19 her physical traits caught up to her true gender. I say let her in. One commenter on the CBC website speculated that the pageant organizers want to get rid of her because the audience of knuckle-dragging males would get confused. Google her name only if you're comfortable with your reactions to these kinds of stories because she is stunningly beautiful. Here's a link to the CBC story that has a few pics: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-co...r-miss-universe.html | |
|
||
| 03-24-12 07:53pm - 4656 days | #8 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
You all have probably heard this, but Santorum did an interview where he declared that a Scandanavian country that had legalized assisted suicide had now faced a problem that the government was killing seniors without consent. He said that seniors had taken to wearing bracelets informing health care professionals to not kill them. It was a compelling story, except that not one syllable of it was true. A reporter from that country tried to challenge Santorum on his comments but got no further than a PR person who said that what Santorum said is true for him because he believes it in his heart. I think we should all be thankful that when JFK dropped the gauntlet on going to the moon he didn't believe that all it took was smearing a guy with Vaseline and shooting him out of a cannon with a peace offering for the cheese gods on the moon. I'm not on the right of the political spectrum, but I really wish the Republican party would kick the loonies out and sell Americans on real, honest, practical financial solutions and worry less about vaginas and uteruses. | |
|
||
| 03-22-12 05:23pm - 4658 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree with PinkPanther. ALS Scan is the way to go. But... both times I've joined ALS Scan I've been offered ALS Angels at a deep discount. I'm not saying that was anything more than luck, but if you get the same offer you can weigh the value for yourself. Both sites have excellent production values but ALS Scan is the main site and if you're only getting one, get that. I think that it is also much bigger. I mean this as no disrespect to any model, but Alex's tastes in women are pretty much the same as mine (young and petite) and those models tend to be on ALS Scan. As PinkPanther said, models that are fuller figured go on ALS Angels. ALS Angels is one of my favourite sites and is on my list of sites to go back to. I think you can't go wrong with it. | |
|
||
| 03-07-12 05:54pm - 4673 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
First let me say that I’m speaking only from speculation and some news reports that I heard and read over the past while. To answer your question on how do they know, I’d guess that part of it is because the police troll websites where there is anything porn related looking for illegal stuff. That’s just a guess, but it seems reasonable. I have no doubt that they’ve popped in here and read a few reviews and threads. I’d like to think that they’d quickly realize that the mods run a VERY tight ship and the members don’t seem to have any interest in illegal porn and move on. I’d like to think that, but my inner skeptic says that they’d probably hang around wasting their time here. Who knows, maybe one or more of the cops took out a membership based on a review… To further answer your question, I suspect that in most cases they’d have to actually see what you’re downloading to determine if it was illegal or legal. But I suspect that just the nature of the site would clearly be a tip-off. I say that because I suspect (and hope) that the days of just typing ‘kiddie porn’ into a search engine are long over. From what I’m told by people in law enforcement, those days aren’t over, but I’m inclined to think that they’re exaggerating. I say that because every bust of illegal porn in Canada that gets reported seems to involve some sort of private forum where this stuff gets traded. That’s why in most cases there are multiple arrests across the country on a single operation. Now here’s where my skepticism really gets going. I don’t trust that police and prosecutors always have the truth as a goal. I think that the zeal to get child porn stopped (as noble a goal as that is) blinds them to common sense sometimes. I recall reading of a child porn case in the U.S. where the prosecutor actually brought in a physician to examine the photos seized to give an opinion based on physical traits whether the person in the photo was over 18 or under 18. That should send shivers down anyone’s spine if a prosecutor thinks that this is any way to run a case. I don’t recall how the case turned out, but I hope it got thrown out. How can you not find reasonable doubt with an ‘expert’ who says that based on a photo he can tell if a girl is 17 years and 364 days old versus 18 years old? Would you trust this guy to look at your collection of Amai Liu or Kat photos? You’d be married to the man with the most cigarettes in Cellblock D in a heartbeat. The other thing that gets my spidey-sense tingling on this is the way the police and prosecutors sell the stories to the media. I realize that the media are willing partners in this. As Homer once said to Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen. I’ve seen, heard and read of stories where the media report that a person has been charged with possessing child porn and he had over 100,000 photos in his collection. Then, as an afterthought, it’s mentioned that about 300 of them were illegal. So that says to me that the other 99,700 were legal. As in they may have been MILF pics, but the damage is done. Hmmm… while I’m thinking of it, several years ago there was a couple arrested in a neighbouring city for producing child porn. Apparently they were taking photos of their 14 year old daughter and they were going on the web. Early in the story I remember distinctly that the police were admitting that in none of the pictures was the girl actually nude. That detail was dropped in later stories and the family was convicted and the daughter removed from the home. The defence was that the parents, at the request of the girl who wanted to be a model, had taken sets of photos and sold them to a U.S. site that acted as an agent for teen girls. Yes, I’m suspicious of that too, but in my opinion to have child porn you need children and you need porn. But we all know that’s wrong because a director could dress a 30 year old woman in pigtails and the authorities could come down on them hard. The final thing I’ll mention is that several years ago I heard a story on a CBC radio documentary show about child porn busts. The premise of the story was that the cops don’t do their homework all the time. The story was based around a real tragedy. It seems that back in the wild-west days of the internet before the police really started to figure it out, you actually could find child porn sites and whip out your credit card and become a member. One of these sites was run out of Texas and the owners covered both sides of the fence by offering illegal and legal porn. The offices eventually got raided and some of the credit card numbers that the site had were from buyers in Canada. The police in Texas did the right thing and sent those numbers to the RCMP in Canada. With a caveat: the company ran an illegal site and a legal site and there is no way to tell from the records who subscribed to what so these are merely a starting point. But what did the RCMP and local police forces do? You guessed it: they arrested everyone and charged them with buying child porn. Names of the charged were published. Lives were ruined. Imagine that you subscribed to “Hairy MILFs” and suddenly find yourself an outcast for being a child pornographer. It happened. Eventually it all got sorted out, but not before a few guys killed themselves. And I doubt that many of the other innocent men ever really got their lives back together. The moral of the story, as concluded by the journalists, was that police and the media need to be more careful in these matters and check the facts carefully. No more running with a story just to satisfy the masses. The very next day, I kid you not, there was a small child porn bust in the country with a handful of guys being arrested. Guess how long the CBC journalists heeded their own advice? Less than a day. As to how to avoid getting swept up and being wrongfully accused? I only deal with sites that have a clear 2257 certification for one thing. But only dealing with sites that you find on TBP and PU helps. And I try to only deal with sites that use reputable billers. My hope is that all of those tactics significantly reduces my risk. It also reduces my risk of credit card fraud and identity theft. But it likely wouldn’t stop someone from accusing you of having illegal porn based on those videos with the lass named Aubrey Addams. I once had an ex-girlfriend of mine call me in tears because she discovered her husband was looking at child porn. She knew where he was getting it too: a site called Ampland. I’m not a regular to Ampland but I know it well enough to know that there’s nothing illegal there. Imagine if she called the police on him? I’d like to think that they’d quickly realize the site was legal, but I wouldn’t bet my future on it. | |
|
||
| 03-06-12 04:13pm - 4674 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Let’s say that a long-time friend of yours ‘comes out of the closet’ porn-wise and says he’s a fan and would like to try some pay memberships. For argument sake, let’s say this friend has tastes very similar to your own. Besides telling him to sign up for a Porn Users Account, what sites would you recommend to someone just starting a collection? For me, it’d be these (while reserving the right to add more as I think of them…) • The first would have to be Videobox. I know there are some downsides to VB and I’ve written about a few of my pet peeves too, but when porn buddies look for a place to start this is a must-have. If a person doesn’t have any specific niches of interest that are well outside of the mainstream then someone can build a decent collection with VB. • Up next, considering that this person share my tastes, would have to be Evil Angel. There are two separate sites that don’t seem to share a lot of material and both are available with a TBP discount so for $20 you can get both of them for a month. EA is probably the best studio site out there in that it’s an incredible value and they post their newest stuff quickly. It’s also an amazing site for someone who likes porn with a bit of and edge and especially likes anal. • ALS Scan would have to be on this list. I like their mix of beautiful women, beautiful locations and photo and video shoots that seem like everyone is having fun. Add to that that the site is very good on the technical stuff and the photos and videos are excellent quality. • If I’m recommending ALS Scan I’d also have to mention FTV Girls. Considering my new porn buddy has similar tastes he’ll love the beautiful women and technical perfection, but he’ll really love the great public nudity scenes. • Since my porn buddy clearly likes public nudity I’d recommend Public Flash and Teasers VOD too. I’m not sure if PF is still updating, but the collection is large enough to merit at least a month there. • Other than those, I’d recommend rounding out the niche collection by joining as many Kink.com sites as fits his interests. I’ve been a member of many of their sites multiple times and wouldn’t hesitate for a second to recommend any of them. This is true BDSM and not the male-centred stuff where the guys degrade the woman for their own pleasure. I’ve never found BDSM-themed sites that are in the same league as anything by Kink. So what would be on your list? | |
|
||
| 03-06-12 03:50pm - 4674 days | #16 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Ah, another assman I see! That's a favourite pose of mine too, though I prefer small breasts so there is less hanging and swinging going on! | |
|
||
| 03-05-12 02:26pm - 4675 days | #14 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I’m not a big collector of photos so I can’t claim the same level of interest that some of you have, but I do know what I like. I’m a fan of the female derriere and I like to see that displayed in all its glory. For me, I’d say the favourite has to be the woman lying face down on a bed with her ass kicked up enough that the camera can catch a glimpse of her vagina and anus. Those photos are made better if the model is looking back at the camera. The absolute best example of this type of photo is one of the photos used on the main page of Skinny Super Girl. Gloria is posed on bed with some loose pillows and her right leg is pulled up a bit to open her nether regions to give us a little peek. And to top it off she has this look on her face that’s an alluring mix of ‘come hither’ and disdain. That’s the sort of pose I like. While I’m on the topic, I also prefer to see a close-up or two of the model’s face. I like naturally pretty women and just a face shot can be arousing. I downloaded a set of Faye Reagan a few days ago and there is one photo which is only her face from the left 3/4 angle. Faye is painfully beautiful and seeing that as a high-res shot with her freckles could melt a dead man’s heart. And finally, I know I’m more ass-centric than most, but I’m frequently dismayed at the number of photo sets that don’t include an ass shot where we can see the model’s anus. I’m not asking for shots that would look at home in a proctology text, but just seeing the Holiest of Holies is important to some of us. I downloaded four sets of a Penthouse Pet I liked and there were surprisingly few shots of her ass generally and not a single one where you could see her anus. Surely I’m not the only member here who feels this way? | |
|
||
| 02-26-12 04:39pm - 4683 days | #37 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Does that change it permanently on that computer? | |
|
||
| 02-26-12 12:56pm - 4683 days | #35 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Is it possible to permanently label a drive? Mine seem to be assigned a letter each time I plug them in. To add to the problem I plug the drives into two different computers too. | |
|
||
| 02-26-12 12:54pm - 4683 days | #34 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Sorry for the confusion... All I meant was that I right-click on the scene I like and create a shortcut on that drive. Then I label and store the shortcuts in a separate folder so that I can access them easily. The problem is that when you create the shortcut you computer has assigned a letter to that drive and that may not always be the same. But you can easily change the drive letter to make the shortcut valid again. This only works if you don't change the rest of the path or name of the file. I hope this helps... | |
|
||
| 02-26-12 06:20am - 4684 days | #29 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Like most of you, I'm definitely overlooking some decent porn that I already own. That's probably an unavoidable fact when your collection is nearing 10TB. I make it a point to regularly plug in an older drive and just watch some stuff that I haven't seen in a while. That can be a lot of fun and sometimes I discover a model that I've not really noticed before. Also like many of you, I create shortcuts to link to favourite scenes. It's a quick and easy way to find a scene later. But I also face the problem of having the drive letter change. There's an easy fix for that. It may be different depending on your operating system but Googling it will provide a simple solution. That can't help, of course, if you've changed the path or file name. | |
|
||
| 02-16-12 05:52pm - 4693 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
When I had a membership to Fucked Hard 18 recently I was a bit disappointed to see the models listed only by their first name. I'm pretty meticulous (ie anal...) about cataloging my collection and I want full names in case I want to locate all the scenes on a model that I might later have some interest in. Some of them were obvious, but since FH18 uses a lot of new, little known models I spent a lot of time on IAFD tracking models by identifying characteristics. Names like Allie, Bailey, Kara (there were four Karas on the site...), Katie, Lexi, Tiffany and Victoria are VERY popular choices among ladies just starting out and who have done little work. My guess is that if they aren't creative enough to come up with a unique name then they probably aren't creative enough to become a star. | |
|
||
| 02-13-12 08:45am - 4697 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
 | |
|
||
| 02-13-12 08:45am - 4697 days | #11 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
They are actually on the stomach. They're two little balls about the same level as the navel but further over on the right of her body. I'm not sure how they're held there (I'm no expert on body piercing!) but I assume there is some sort of a hook with a smaller ball threaded on to hold it in place. | |
|
||
| 02-13-12 08:42am - 4697 days | #10 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
JM Productions actually released this as a video. I like JM Productions as a studio, but that decision has always bugged me. Tanner was probably having a bad day, as we can all have, and it gets exploited and used against her. I really wish JM Productions would have exercised better judgment and left that in the 'deleted' pile. | |
|
||
| 02-12-12 06:06pm - 4697 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree that the model's comfort with the scene is a big plus. I've seen several scenes with models who clearly weren't comfortable and it doesn't make for an enjoyable scene. Several of Teagan Presley's anal scenes come to mind. The new stomach piercings don't really bother me much because they're so small that they don't really stick out. But they do seem to be in a pretty unusual spot. As for Tanner's complexion, that was the first thing I noticed. I wasn't aware that it could be related to drug use. But since she's well past the age where hormones are causing acne problems there has to be some explanation. I'd hate to think that it's drugs. If she needs drugs to get through her day I hope she leaves the business and gets the help she needs. If I recall correctly, there is at least one more Tanner anal scene to be released by Evil Angel. I might be wrong on that, but I'm guessing that you, pat, will have that information. I can always count on you! | |
|
||
| 02-12-12 08:25am - 4698 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Yes, I realize that I’m probably the PU member most obsessed with this, but I’m sure that there are many others who have an interest in this: Evil Angel has posted the recently-shot Tanner Mayes scene for Mike Adriano’s Nasty Anal Tryouts 2. I realize that there have been other Tanner Mayes anal scenes, but those seem more like Sasquatch sightings than actual scenes. Reality Kings boasted of a Tanner anal scene, but it was just a quick head insertion, and Porno Dan has done one, but apparently it isn’t well shot so it isn’t worth the effort trying to source it. But Mike Adriano is among the best anal-themed directors in the business and he brings out the best in Tanner. Her look here is different as she has dyed her hair blonde. She still looks great! The scene is better than I expected with Tanner seeming pretty comfortable for a relative anal newcomer. Full marks to Mike Adriano for casting her in a b/g scene since most of the other scenes in the movie are b/g/g. Tanner deserves the spotlight. Full marks too to Evil Angel for posting new releases on their website. So many other studios would wait until this title was bargain-bin material before letting it out on the web. With the $9.95 TBP/PU discount, Evil Angel is an excellent value and if all you wanted was the Tanner scene that’s still not a bad deal. But if you have an anal interest, Evil Angel is a must-have membership. So many thanks to Tanner Mayes, Mike Adriano and Evil Angel for making this scene, making it good, and making it available. You’ve made me a very happy fan. | |
|
||
| 02-11-12 11:52am - 4698 days | #16 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree! While I definitley also agree with messmer's desire for only the best quality, I treat that as 'the best available version of a particular scene.' I won't delete a scene unless I can get a better version of it. I honestly can't imagine deleting an old Tammi Ann or Inari Vachs scene because the resolution looks crappy. Having said that, I am always on the lookout for better quality versions of favourite scenes. | |
|
||
| 02-08-12 08:41am - 4702 days | #17 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
And more likely now that Rick Santorum won three Republican primaries. I'll never understand the concept of smaller government that is still happy to impose narrow morality on others. | |
|
||
| 02-08-12 08:38am - 4702 days | #10 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
My experience with something like this was that I tossed out some old VHS tapes simply because storing them was such a pain in the ass. I've regretted that ever since. I spent a long time trying to rebuild that 'historical' part of my collection. I realize harddrive prices are a bit high now, but they are still worth it. My advice is to store the stuff so you can go back and enjoy it when you want to. | |
|
||
| 02-08-12 08:35am - 4702 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I have neither, but this is a good way for me to ask a question that would seem weird otherwise. Does anyone here watch Pawn Stars? That's the series taped in a pawn shop in Vegas. I've watched it since it started and they've always had this wall-hanging / sculpture on the wall that looks pretty gaudy but interesting too. It's a raised molded form of the back of a woman who is nude but draping a towel below her ass. It appears to be painted gold and is mounted on a frame. I'd loke to have something like that in my den. Does anyone know what I'm talking about? Anyone know anything about this thing? Surely it was mass produced at some point. | |
|
||
| 02-08-12 08:30am - 4702 days | #11 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Is that a Realdoll? Those things are incredible! | |
|
||
| 02-05-12 02:35pm - 4704 days | #14 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Don't give up a great hobby! At least not for these reasons. Do something big like find Jesus and then quit, telling us that we're all going to hell as you leave. I've been buying online porn and porn memberships for over 10 years now and I have been very lucky to have never been defrauded. Before finding this site and TBP I guess I was just lucky because I still managed to avoid the sites that looked a little suspicious. The biggest thing you can do is deal exclusively with reputable and known billing providers. That means showing some restraint when you find a site that you really want to see but you'd have to give your card number directly to the site or to an unknown biller. I'd like to claim that I've never done that, but I have... As for your friends immediately jumping to the conclusion that this issue has to be porn related, while it may well be, I suspect they may be showing some anti-porn biases. I really doubt that all other kinds of online purchases are immune from fraud. | |
|
||
| 02-05-12 02:21pm - 4704 days | #9 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
A couple of years ago I was streaming a bunch of older videos that I found at a reputable VOD site. The cost per video was low, maybe $5 or so, but there were several charges. I could see how this might look suspicious. My MasterCard provider called to make sure they were legitimate. | |
|
||
| 01-25-12 05:15pm - 4715 days | #16 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Congratulations on reaching this milestone. I've seen some boards where people will pad their post counts by adding nothing but fluff to a conversation, but you can always be counted on for making some good points and starting useful threads. | |
|
||
| 01-14-12 09:00am - 4726 days | #50 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I rarely use tube sites, and after reading what you wrote I'll be certain to report pirated material to sites that own it if I see any. That, and actually paying for the memberships I have, is a good way to show support for the industry. | |
|
||
| 01-14-12 08:58am - 4726 days | #49 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks for taking the time to post this. This is really useful information and I'll stop feeling guilty simply because I happen to like a lot of material that a site has to offer. If anything, the site should take that as a compliment. | |
|
||
| 01-13-12 10:06am - 4727 days | #16 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I watched some porn on my iPad just to try it out. Size is an issue, but likely the only time you'd use a tablet is when you don't have access to a PC or laptop hooked to a large monitor. I can't say for sure, but I suspect the screen resolution is much better on the iPad than on the old monitors we all had. | |
|
||
| 01-11-12 01:48pm - 4729 days | #10 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Sorry Khan... I should have checked... | |
|
||
| 01-10-12 05:25pm - 4730 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I don’t, because the only cell phone I have is owned by work, and they frown on that sort of thing. But I have a porn buddy who watches porn exclusively on Samsung’s equivalent to the iPhone. I’ve never used my iPad for porn because the late Steve Jobs won’t let me, but also because I prefer the bigger screen of a PC or laptop. I rarely recall anyone ever talking about porn on a mobile phone. It might be our demographic. Do you ever use your phone for accessing a pay site? | |
|
||
| 01-10-12 04:40pm - 4730 days | #41 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Simon - I hope you don't regret stopping in to this thread, but I'd really like to get your thoughts on something related to what you wrote. You wrote that 'bandwidth is so much cheaper nowadays that it isn't really an issue for any size of site.' I have to say that probably my biggest worry about downloading a lot of material from a site is related specifically to bandwidth and not production costs for the material. My worry is that if I really like the site and take a lot of material I'm cost the site for bandwidth rather than letting them make money off me. What you say is that bandwidth shouldn't be a worry. Is that a correct take on what you said? Knowing that big or small, downloading a lot of material from a site won't bankrupt them in terms of bandwidth costs will help me sleep better at night. | |
|
||
| 01-08-12 05:26pm - 4732 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Be careful if you decide to go back to Reality Kings. They're enforcing a daily download limit of 10GB. If you're mostly after photos it should be less of a problem, but you should be aware that it exists. | |
|
||
| 01-08-12 04:49pm - 4732 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Welcome to the forum and the site. I think you'll find this an amazing resource for information on anything related to porn. The members are incredibly friendly and helpful. The site managers / moderators are a great group too and they work tirelessly to make this site better. Having siad that, I have to confess that I can't help you in the slightest. Your tastes and my tastes are completely opposite. I prefre videos, and I prefer petite models. I'm sure the regulars will give you lots of useful tips. | |
|
||
| 01-07-12 07:13am - 4734 days | #33 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks for weighing in. I agree that a true 'ripper' is indiscriminate and lets some digital doodad do the downloading. That isn't me. | |
|
||
| 01-07-12 07:12am - 4734 days | #32 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I love Halifax. It's a beautiful city. I was posted at Shearwater across the harbour for a while and loved living in the area. I get to travel to CFB Halifax on occasion and love every second I'm there. | |
|
||
| 01-06-12 05:29pm - 4734 days | #28 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I've asked this same question of several industry people (one a family member) and I NEVER get a straight answer. I'm with Bell Aliant in NB and they have yet to impose a cap, but I'm sure it will come because it seems all major ISPs in Canada are going that route. The downside to that is that I've been joining sites more frequently and downloading like a madman until the caps get imposed. After that I'll go into withdrawl. Messmer, are you in the Maritimes too? | |
|
||
| 01-06-12 05:23pm - 4734 days | #27 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks for such a too-the-point answer from a webmaster. Even with faceless mega-site I worry that I'm downloading too much if in the run of a membership I find a lot I like. When it comes to a smaller site I really worry that my bandwidth demands alone make my membership a money loser. I usually try to compensate for that by regularly rejoining smaller sites at relatively frequent intervals so I'm sure they can make some money off me. | |
|
||
| 01-05-12 02:07pm - 4735 days | #19 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Interesting concept and one that could work if implemented properly and sites were transparent about it. | |
|
||
| 01-05-12 02:05pm - 4735 days | #18 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree. At first I read Capn's definition as capturing me as a site ripper since I do tend to download a lot from a site in a short time. But... where I think I fail to become a ripper is that while I may download a lot, there is nothing indiscriminate about it. With my Fucked Hard 18 membership, for example, the webmaster may think I'm ripping his site, but in reality I look at the thumbs for each scene and go through a specific thought process: "18-22 years old, petite, smallish breasts, covering in oil... want it." There's nothing indiscrimiate about it. If the webmasters through in some MILF BBWs then I could say I skipped a few scenes. | |
|
||
| 801-850 of 1453 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 16 | Page 17 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 24 | 29 | 30 | Next Page > |
|
