|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
rearadmiral (0)
|
| 1201-1250 of 1453 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 24 | Page 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next Page > |
| 02-26-11 08:48am - 5048 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
For me it was Adult Check, which I joined about 13 or 14 years ago. I stayed a member for several years. I started with them when I had a dial-up connection, which worked reasonably well because at the time they were pretty much only pics or very small videos. I see they're still around, and they appear to work on the same principle of being a clearing house for a lot of other smaller sites. Anyone else remember their first? | |
|
||
| 02-26-11 05:12am - 5049 days | #28 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree that this is a workable solution, but there is a serious downside to these devices: they only play the newest versions of files that are capable of supporting HD. 90%+ of my collection is wmv files. Only a small percentage of those are in wmv9 format, but these devices will only play wmv9. They won't play versions 5-8, which are in wide use on porn sites. Check the properties of your files and if you have a lot of older versions of videos they probably won't play. If you don't have a lot of files to deal with, you could convert them. The manufacturers of these devices don't really make it obvious that they only play the newest versions of files. I have no idea why they wouldn't build in more capability. | |
|
||
| 02-20-11 11:47am - 5054 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm not sure if there are websites that cater to this niche, but I'd guess there are. You can also stream videos from some of the VOD sites. Look for any of the American Gokkun series from JM Productions. Gokkun is exactly what you're looking for. These videos feature well known porn stars who have maybe a hundred guys jerk off on them and they catch the stuff in a dish or something and then drink it. Some of the later editions of the American Bukkake series from JM Productions also offer a lot of swallowing. Your best bet if you want to find and view any of the American Gokkun or American Bukkake series is to go to IAFD and search the titles. That will link you to reviews that might help you choose and will also give you links to where you can find the movies online. If you want to add cum swapping to the mix, my recommendation is to check out the scene with Chelsie Rae and Keeani Lei in American Gokkun 5. They swap a large amount of cum back and forth through a clear pipe. It's an excellent scene. And welcome to Pornusers. I think you'll find this site is an excellent resource and the staff and members are all great to deal with. | |
|
||
| 02-16-11 04:11am - 5059 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I dunno messmer, I'm Canadian too and I just put a bumper sticker on my car that says "I support the CBC." Some people might consider that a political uprising. Serious though, this list looks pretty suspicious. | |
|
||
| 02-14-11 05:25pm - 5060 days | #8 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Amen to that. And I'm baaaaad with dates... | |
|
||
| 02-14-11 03:25pm - 5060 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
No further explanation. Your words are wise. There are some things I've just given up even trying to understand, and the fairer sex tops that list. I have a gay male cousin who is married (and it didn't cause the moral fabric of society to tear asunder...) and sometimes I wonder if being married to male would be easier. Then I think to the three times a year I have sex with my spouse and figure that I'll stick with what I have. | |
|
||
| 02-14-11 01:34pm - 5060 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
My bride wanted me to get her a gift certificate for a local spa. I learned the hard way that buying a gift certificate from a small, independednt business in an industry that is probably among the first to be hit by a downturn in discretionary spending isn't such a good idea. The spa goes tits up with my money. I won't get fooled again. So I made her my own gift certificate instead. If I go tits up she gets the money anyway... My bride is also fairly illogical, of which I was reminded last night. We were all settled in, she watching mindless crap on the telly, me reading mindless crap in a magazine. She says to me in a very sarcastic tone "Happy Valentine's Day to you too." I was a bit startled. Not because I missed Valentine's Day but because someone obviously forgot to tell me that the day was moved to the 13th. I looked at her and told her that Valentine's Day is tomorrow, to which she replied, "I know, but if it was today you'd have missed it." I can't win...  | |
|
||
| 02-11-11 06:52pm - 5063 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I hadn't thought of it that way, TheSquirrel. Good point. I'm always willing to pay for quality, I guess I just got it stuck in my head that the highest price I'd be willing to pay was $20. | |
|
||
| 02-11-11 06:12pm - 5063 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I’ll admit right off that my sample is really limited: I check out sites reviewed by the reviewers at TBP and by you at PU, but it seems that the average monthly subscription price is up a bit. I used to think $19.95 was the typical rate, but it seems that $24.95 is a lot more common now for a site with exclusive content. Am I just basing this on a small sample, or are prices on the way up? | |
|
||
| 02-05-11 03:51pm - 5069 days | #27 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I suspect that you're 100% right. The ISPs do it because they can. I hope someone can shed some light on whether the digital signal for TV is somehow different from the signal for internet. BTW pat, I suspect that your phone is still over the old copper line. Going fiberop for that is probably a little over the top. Videotron may have told you you're all fibreop, but I'll bet if you looked you'd find an intact copper line in your home. And one other thing pat: if you live in Canada and have Videotron as an ISP that means you live in Quebec. From any persepctive, and especially a porn perspective, Quebec is an amazing place. I haven't been to the strip clubs on Ste. Catherine in a few years, but there are few places on the planet as fun as Montreal. Vive la Quebec! | |
|
||
| 02-05-11 06:50am - 5070 days | #23 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I know, I know, I'm probably dragging this discussion on futher than it needs to go, but I have a related tech question. I have fiber op service that delivers both TV and internet. Aren't both just essntially the same data? If I turned all TVs on to HD channels and let them run for 24 hours wouldn't that use a ton of bandwidth? Isn't that the same data as I get from the internet? Or are they somehow different? | |
|
||
| 02-05-11 06:48am - 5070 days | #22 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
You've hit the nail on the head. We're too complacent here. I recall a couple of years ago when the Canadian dollar hit parity and then exceeded the U.S. dollar. People were wondering why U.S. magazines and books would have one price in U.S. dollars and a higher price in Canadian dollars. (Penthouse, for example - and I only buy it for the articles - would have a $8 U.S. price and a $10 Canadian price, when the Canadian dollar was actually higer than the U.S. dollar.) I heard some economist interviewed who tried to explain why that was the case but ultimately he concluded by saying that companies do that because Canadian are complacent and will just pay more. Maybe we should burn some ISP members in effigy in downtown Toronto and see if we can get better service. | |
|
||
| 02-05-11 06:44am - 5070 days | #21 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I couldn't agree more, pat. At least one corporation has made comments on the negative impact of high costs (for the consumer) of bandwidth. Netflix has said that it is rethinking coming to the Canadian market. They have several issues here, but one of the biggest has to be the caps that most ISPs impose. It certainly is no coincidence that one of the major ISPs lowered their cap the day after Netflix announced it was coming to Canada. Do you think that it might have anything to do with the fact the the major telecoms are in competition with Netflix? And just to reiterate, I'm not opposed to reasonable caps and I'm not opposed to user-pay models either. But when the ISPs charge consumers prices that are several hundred times greater than the cost that is simply gouging. Imagine if high gasoline users were required to pay more per gallon or litre than lower users? I have a small car and pay $3 per gallon but you have an SUV becuase you pull a trailer and have three kids, and you have to pay $4 per gallon. I think people woudld find that unfair. | |
|
||
| 02-05-11 05:51am - 5070 days | #21 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Down the Hatch shouldn't be too tough to find. It might be on the Diabolic site, but read the reviews of the site before joining. I had some issues with it when I last joined. It may be fixed now though. It's also available on several VOD sites, but those will have DRM. Adult DVD Empire does have the option of download to own, but that is still DRM protected (but unless they've changed, they'll give you three licences to either save or use on other computers). On a semi-related note, I agree with what the first reviewer says when comparing Ashley Long and Angel Long. Angel is definitely the better looking, though I think they're equally dirty. And while on the subject of Angel Long, I remember the first scene I saw with Angel Long. It was in Young as they Cum 4. It was love at first sight. The scene was shot in the second year of her porn career when she would be 22 though she looks 18. She does a pole dance clothed and then moves to a decent scene on a couch. Anal is included, which, for me, is a big plus. And thanks to the miracle of them internets, I've just downloaded this movie from Adult DVD Empire. I have the scene as part of my collection, but it's just a digital capture from a crappy VHS so it doesn't do the scene justice. It'll be great to see it in better quality again. | |
|
||
| 02-04-11 12:20pm - 5070 days | #17 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
This might be the beginning of the long slide into senility... For me to forget a porn scene (even though I have thousands of them) doesn't happen often, but in this case I'm going to have to 'fess up to having screwed up. The scene I was thinking of was not Ashley Long in Spring Chickens 1, though to my credit I did get the model and the studio right. The scene is Ashley Long in Down the Hatch 9. I'm certain of that since I dusted off the drive that contains that scene and confirmed it. And it is with three guys, not just two. Mistake aside, it's still a great scene. Sorry for the confusion. Now where did I leave my Geritol... | |
|
||
| 02-03-11 04:32am - 5072 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Not that this is exactly what you're looking for, but in one of the early Spring Chickens series from Diabolic (I think it is actually Spring Chickens 1) Ashley Long does what one of the male stars calls an "ass to mouth merry-go-round." She lays on her belly on a low thing like a footstool and each guy fucks and end and they change up every few strokes. It's a pretty hot scene from an excellent series. | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 06:31pm - 5072 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Just to be perfectly clear, I'm not asking for something and not willing to pay for it. If an ISP could charge a tiered rate that made high users pay a reasonable and proportional rate more than low users, then I'm fine with that. But setting low limits and then charging un-fucking-believable per GB rates isn't the way to go. Unless, of course, there is limited competition and what competition there is does the same thing. Then we, as consumers, just get bent over and fucked. | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 06:27pm - 5072 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'd definitely consider staying around a decent site I liked if the pricing model took into account that usage in recurring months would likely be lower. And I agree that it also acts as a sort of reward for the loyal customers. There are several sites out there that I'd really like to stay a member of for recurring months but since I'd be looking at the same price for a handful of updates I just can't afford to do it no matter how much I'd like to support the company. And I also should say that until now I've never visited your site, Strip Game Central. I'll definitely be taking a closer look at that because with the quick look I had it is certainly something I'm interested in, and I am on the hunt for something new. | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 04:38pm - 5072 days | #9 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I have no idea what I'm talking about here because I don't have a clue about the telecom business, but could some of this desire to cap and charge high fees on internet bandwidth to protect their traditional TV advertising revenue be similar to how the music industry completely blew the move to legally downloadable music. I think the music industry could have come out stronger if they realized that what peopel wanted was to get music in a format that they wanted, not in the format the industry wanted. The industry saw everyone as a potential pirate when I think it was just the consumers pushing for a better way to get music. And when the music indiustry dipped their toe into online music they fucked it up by pricing it like high art. Say what you want about Apple, but they forced the music industry into a better model and things are now looking up. | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 04:33pm - 5072 days | #8 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I have my service through Aliant and wasn't aware that they were planning to impose a cap. They do have a 'soft' cap in that in their agreement they say that the average household should use no more than 250GB per month. I could easily live with that. But if the cap is lower, people aren't going to be able to take advantage of the shift away from traditional TV to a more user-defined experience. But then I suspect that is one of the main reasons that the big telecoms want to push caps. Their traditional model is under pressure and they want to discourage people from leaving. One way is to make it too expensive to leave. | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 04:27pm - 5072 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I can't agree with your first point. I agree that the cost of the infrastructure is high, but it costs the same to run copper, cable or fiberop to my house whether I use 10MB a month or 1TB per month. My specific question is how much does the data cost? I do, however, agree with you that the pay-for-what-you-use model makes sense, but only if it is priced reasonably. If you and I are neighbors and we both have the same service from the same ISP and you use less bandwidth than I do, then I should pay more, but $4 per GB seems a bit high if, as you suggest (and I suspect that you're close) the real cost is 2 cents. I think people would be pissed if electrical utilities charged a set price per kilowatt hour of electricity up to an average monthly use and then charged 200 times that for electricity above that average use. I could see society using that model for electricity to encourage reduction in use, but that cost model doesn't realistically apply to bandwidth. To make a bandwidth cap model that made sense would also mean having a cap that made some sense. There is one ISP that has a cap of 15GB per month. You couldn't watch 30 mins a day of streaming without incurring additional costs with a cap that low. Also, one beef I have with the capped model is that I'm encouraged to buy a service with faster speeds, yet if I have the faster speed won't I use it more? The faster services are priced higher and I presumed that part of that cost (if not ALL of that additional cost since the hardware is identical) is the additional bandwidth. So my ISP sells a 10Mbit service for $30/month and a 20Mbit service for $50/month. The hardware is the same, and the cap is the same? So what am I paying for? | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 12:38pm - 5072 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree about the CRTC issue. I read yesterday though that the CRTC has been asked to rethink the whole issue. I understand that the PM got a 200,000 name petition after the original boneheaded decision. A porn buddy of mine recently switched ISPs and I strongly encouraged him to tell his old ISP that he was leaving because of the caps and make it clear to the new one that he was signing up with the because of their lack of caps. It drives me up a wall.  | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 11:16am - 5072 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Here in the land of holy-fuck-it’s-cold-and-fuck-me-if-it-isn’t-snowing-again, otherwise known as Canada, ISPs really seem to get their jollies by imposing bandwidth caps. One of the biggest in the country, Rogers Telecommunications, imposes some caps and then charges (I think) $4 per GB of data used above the cap. I’m not a techie, but I can’t imagine that in any warped world that a GB of data bandwidth is worth anywhere near that. My completely uneducated guess would be that a GB of bandwidth might actually cost the ISP a couple of cents. I realize that they may try to argue for high infrastructure costs, but charging for additional bandwidth doesn’t resolve that. And I’m sure it has absolutely nothing with the fact that this company is one of the largest cable providers and they don’t want to lose those customers to online viewing. | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 11:15am - 5072 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I realize that a lot can factor in to your consideration, but generally how long between when you download the last byte you want from a site until you’re pulling out your credit card again? For me, I try not to overdo it, but I usually have a new site in mind as I’m wrapping up the current one. Most times I’ll try to hold off for a couple of weeks and spend some quality time with what I just downloaded, but admittedly, I’m as successful at this as the times growing up as a Catholic kid that I tried to give up porn for Lent. Usually with an hour or two of Mass on Ash Wednesday I’d be climbing the walls and have to dig out my collection of Hustler and Penthouse magazines. For the forty days of Lent, I don’t think I ever held out from porn for more than forty minutes. What I’m saying, I guess, is that with porn I don’t have a lot of willpower so I usually take a new membership pretty quickly after I’m done with the current one. Anyone more impulsive or more selective than that? | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 10:56am - 5072 days | #22 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Jesus, Khan! I'm having some blood-distribution issues here after reading that! And now my pants are getting too tight... So I suggest a PU gathering at graymane's place! | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 10:53am - 5072 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
This may be a sign that I like porn too much, but hearing stories like Mistress Kent's seriously pisses me off. For those of us that appreciate all the work that sites and studios do (and that's probably the vast majority of regulars here) it is obvious that hackers and pirates are a serious drain on people creating new material. While I have on rare occasions shared a scene with a porn buddy, I did it more as advertisement than as a means to defeat a copyright. I figure if I can interest a friend in a site then he might send some business that way. It has worked in the past. I think that tar-and-feathering would be a good start for these bastards. I'll bring the tar. Just call me. | |
|
||
| 02-02-11 04:12am - 5073 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks for the cautionary tale graymane. I hope you're able to get any lingering issues resolved. I'm like most people, I roll my eyes whenever I hear of someone being duped by a scammer and think to myself that I'm too smart to fall for something like that. But experience shows otherwise. Several years ago I got an email from my ISP. The message was that I had a virus and was spreading it from my PC infecting other customers and that unless I cleaned it off, they'd shut me down. For me, being shut down means no more porn, so I ran the attached .exe file. As soon as I clicked on 'run,' I knew I'd made a baaaad choice. That seriously screwed me up. My poor PC need professional help after that. More seriously, I work with a guy who was duped out of $20,000 by a scam. I'd like to think that I'd have seen that one coming, and all the warnings were there, but I guess when we're in the middle of it it can be hard to see. You might have the odd comment that you were a fool to believe this person, but I don't agree. Scams work by making us think that we're safe and they prey on the sense of trust that most of us have. Good luck with this and I hope it doesn't impact too much on your participation here. I also hope that you're able to salvage your collection. If you do, you owe it to yourself to back it up. Maybe a group of computer owners could take some vigilante action and tar and feather a known hacker sometime. Let me know if you catch him: I'll bring the tar. M | |
|
||
| 02-01-11 01:47pm - 5073 days | #17 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I gotta get out more. This sounds like my kind of place! | |
|
||
| 02-01-11 01:47pm - 5073 days | #16 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I was raised Catholic though, so just plain nudity is a sin and therefore instantly arousing.  | |
|
||
| 01-31-11 05:38pm - 5074 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm glad you recognize that this is just you. Hell, just reading the line "long... soapy baths, showers, hot tubs or whatever gets their bodies coated with H2O" made me need to have a wank...  | |
|
||
| 01-31-11 04:28pm - 5074 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
 Too funny!!!! | |
|
||
| 01-31-11 02:12pm - 5074 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Yes, I know that I can be accused of having some strange interests, but I'm not being judgmental here. I'm just raising this simply bacause it never occured to me that someone would create a site like this. But I'll be the first to say that this is pretty much 100% my fault for lacking imagination. TBP recently reviewed a site called Underwatershow.com. It seems to have a pretty single-minded purpose: show nude women swimming as captured by an underwater camera. Here's one piece of copy on the website: Welcome to the wonderful underwater erotic world, a special place on the web for all lovers of the submerged female forms. The water reveals the real beauty of the woman's body. Girls are like hovering in zero gravity state. When they swim by the camera you'll be ready to dive into the screen and swim together with them. I'd be lying if I said that this doesn't intrigue me at all. If the fee was less than $29.99 I might be writing a review right now instead of wondering about this niche. Anyone else ever find a site and think, hmmmmm... never thought of that before, but it might be interesting... | |
|
||
| 01-30-11 03:28pm - 5075 days | #35 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I've come to a conclusion after reading what some of these hardcore libertarians write and hearing what some of them say. It seems to me that they push limited government for corporate interests but are still pretty happy with the thought that government can be used to impose a certain morality on the citizens. Here in Canada several years ago we legalized same sex marriages which sent the conservatives off the deep end. It was confusing to have heard them go on and on about smaller government but as soon as a so-called morality issue cropped up suddenly they weren't so libertarian. I had a modest proposal to resolve the issue if we weren't going to let gay people marry and have all the same benefits that I have: cut their taxes so they aren't paying for what we deny them. Of course that went over like a lead balloon with the morality crowd too. On another Max related note, I was looking for a Max scene where he screws Summer Luv in a helicopter over Brazil. I googled it to find which movie it was in and instead ended up reading about one of the worst Max scenes that reviewers saw they ever saw. It had Max, Summer Luv and Catalina. I think it was one of Summer Luv's first Max appearances because she went on to star in many more. By coincidence, I happened to have the scene so I watched it. It is waaaaay over the top, even for Max. But the funny thing was that during the scene Catalina is vaginally fisting Summer Luv and Max obviously says something like "Yeah, fist that 12 year old pussy" but the word twelve (assuming it is twelve, but maybe thirteen or some other illegal age) is crudely overdubbed with a male voice obviously not Max saying "nineteen." It is so badly done that it is extremely funny. And then the puking starts in the scene and it pretty quickly ceases to be funny. I'm a bit of a Max fan, bit only his older material where he was still creepy and still pretty hardcore, but was far from the batshit-crazy stuff he did later in his career. Hell, he even ate pussy in those older movies, demonstrating that he could decide to give pleasure to the starlet. His scene with Tammi Ann in Hitchhiker 1 still ranks as one of my all time favorites. That was also the first time I'd ever seen Tammi Ann and I was hooked at first site. | |
|
||
| 01-25-11 04:40pm - 5080 days | #28 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I was watching a Max video last weekend (yes, I'll admit I'm a bit of a fan of some of his stuff) and I noted how he went out of his way, in a monologue before the action started, to remind the viewers that they were about to see acting. All models were legal, and all consented. Max is also the only director/producer I'm aware of who runs an ad telling people who are sexually active to be careful about STDs and get tested. As much as Max creeped a lot of people out, i'm still convinced that he was targeted by the religious conservatives. | |
|
||
| 01-24-11 03:39pm - 5081 days | #11 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I was also surprised to see that some webmasters pay attention to what we write. I reviewed FTV Girls some time ago. The site usually starts with the modell doing some flashing in public areas and then moves indoors for masturbation. There are some masturbation scenes done in public areas. I noted that the public stuff looked staged so it would be safer, and that brought the heat level down a bit. Within a short period of time the webmaster replied and said that there was nothing planned or staged about the public stuff. I took him at his word, amended the review and gave him a higher score. In the same review I also noted that I'm not a big fan of solo girl stuff and the main reason I joined was for the public stuff. I praised the public stuff and recommended that anyone with the same interest would probably like this site. The webmaster wasn't angry at this, but his tone in a reply led me to believe that he didn't want to be catagorized as a niche site. I didn't get that sentiment. FTV Girls is a site that normally wouldn't be on the radar for someone looking for public nudity. I hoped my endorsement might steer some customers his way. Still, I was surprised that he even read my review... | |
|
||
| 01-13-11 12:26pm - 5092 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I don't know if this qualifies as an answer to the question, but I recently bought a 50" TV and sometimes run my laptop through it. One of the first things I did was to play some scenes I downloaded from HD Porn to see if there was any truth to the HD hype. The answer is yes. HD is incredible to watch on a big screen. I don't do Blu-ray so I can't comment on that, though I suspact that it might be even higher resolution than scenes from HD Porn. And I agree with GCode - it opens a who new dimension to see a model 'warts and all.' I really like that too. | |
|
||
| 01-12-11 12:25pm - 5093 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm glad to give a compliment where it is due, Khan. But in fairness, the TBP staff really had to step in and help because they caused my problem in the first place. When they reviewed PornStar Network" and added it to their "What's Hot" list they used a picture of Katie St. Ives. I'm only a mortal!!! How can I resist her? You could have her picture in an ad that said "Katie St. Ives says 'Buy Khan's non-vulcanized extra-crappy tires for the low price of $500 each!'" All I'd need is the place to send the cheque... But seriously, Katie St. Ives is hot... oops, I mean, thanks. | |
|
||
| 01-11-11 03:38am - 5095 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree, but I think here they're relying on a very technical use of the word 'virgin.' This young lady is probably more sexually experienced than women many years older than her. | |
|
||
| 01-10-11 03:27pm - 5095 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Back in October graymane started a thread here wondering if we might see a trend in girls publically auctioning off their virginity. I figured that this was unlikely, and frankly thought the whole prospect a bit weird. (I don't mean to say that I found the thread weird, but the prospect of virginity going to the highest bidder a bit weird. Perhaps if I were independently wealthy my outlook would change.) After posting my comments I gave it no further thought... until I checked my email today and see that Kink Live is hosting a live 'deflowering.'  Yup... on January 15, 2011 at Kink Live anyone who is interested can whip out their credit card and watch the deed. I've been a member of several Kink sites at multiple times in the past few years, but Kink Live isn't one of them. But if it is anything like their sites that I am familiar with, the quality will be first-rate.I have to say that I find the whole thing strangely arousing. I'm surprised that I feel this way. If I was able to, I think I'd sit in on this one. To be fair, the model, Nikki Blue, is a virgin in the technical sense. She says her hymen in in place, and from what I read at Kink Live, they plan to show that it is as she says it is. The thing that lowers the creepy factor on this is that she isn't some recent high school graduate who has maybe given a few handjobs and blowjobs in her short sexual life. Nikki Blue seems to be in control and has done phone sex, video and picture shoots for Kink, and also live solo BDSM stuff too. She's used dildos on her ass, but never on her pussy. To preserve the market value, no doubt. The setup seems pretty unique too, in that there will be three possible guys and the viewers will choose who gets the job. If you're interested, there is an 8 min HD video of an interview with Nikki Blue about what she's about to do. I'm not sure if I can directly link to the page or not (here goes... http://news.behindkink.com/blog/ ) but if not, just go to Kink and look for "Behind Kink." The link is posted there. | |
|
||
| 01-08-11 05:33pm - 5097 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Your reply is great! That put a big grin on my face. To tell the truth, I'm not in the Canadian Navy (and yes, we have one...). I've been in the Air Force but in sea-suuport operations with the Sea King helo. Canada has no aircraft carriers so relies on Sea Kings on board the destroyers and frigates. The Sea Kings are almost as old as you and are due to be replaced soon, but that promise has been made before. For land-based aircraft like the B-52 and C-130 you can get 50 years of service out of them (some of our C-130s are almost that old and are still in great shape) but when you put an aircraft at sea in the salt air things happen. I'm amazed you guys got as long out as the F-14 as you did.) I'm currently in the Canadian Army, but in what we call a 'purple' trade. Trades like clerks and medical assistants can wear any uniform and get attached to any unit or ship. Same with professions like physician, dentist, lawyer or padre. I'm one of those, but it ain't padre. I wear an army uniform but I work primarily with the Navy, though the Army comes a close second. The Air Force doesn't really need any of the professions since they don't really do anything.  Bottom line - my authority is limited. Mostly because my wife says it is. I've been aboard American ships in the past, and while I was saluted and called Sir, I suspect if I asked for anything other than the directions to the heads I'd be told to fuck off. Hell, I'd do the same. Getting to the real business of this (short and unread) thread, I was very pleasantly surprised that I was treated as I was. Not to be insulting to anyone, but I've heard that PornStar Network is run out of Canada. I'd expect a company run from here (or the U.S. or many European countries or Australia) to have a real interest in customer service. When a company feels the need to head to the Cayman Islands or Cyprus I get a bit skeptical. And finally, that pic you linked to is a hoot!  The real motto is Ready Aye Ready, and for those with an interest in such things, last year marked the 100th anniversary of the Canadian Navy. Prior to that we sailed under the British flag. | |
|
||
| 01-06-11 06:24pm - 5099 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks Wittyguy. I never thought to check the forum since I'm here enough that I figured I'd remember such a thread. I guess not...  | |
|
||
| 01-06-11 04:44pm - 5099 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I don’t understand the financial workings of the internet. But I don’t understand a lot of things and I manage okay. Women, TV and automatic transmissions are just a few of those things. (I live for the first, tolerate the second, and avoid the last at all costs…) But I have a theory about how sites like TBP make money and I’m wondering if I’m anywhere near correct. My theory is this: if I go to a site that I see listed on TBP / PU then TBP /PU gets a bit of a kickback – a finder’s fee. It may be even more if I join a site through TBP. Based on my theory, I only join porn sites through TBP. I take a one-month membership to Videobox twice a year and I don’t type “Videobox” into Google. I make it a point to go to TBP and join through them. When I use VOD sites like HotMovies, Sugar VOD and Adult DVD Empire I do something similar. If there is a title I want to rent I go to IAFD and search it there and link through them assuming that IAFD gets a taste of the deal. So am I right? Do sites like TBP and VOD sites get paid when I use them to spend money on porn? | |
|
||
| 01-06-11 04:43pm - 5099 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I joined Brain Pass / PornStar Network a couple of weeks ago. I had not joined earlier because a friend (and registered but not active PU member) had warned me that over half of the content was inaccessible without paying a further $30 fee. I joined on the strength of a TBP review that said the issue no longer existed because the site now gave full access to people who joined through TBP. The problem is that there was a glitch and I didn’t have full access. So I was screwed over by an unethical site again, right? Wrong. Much to my very pleasant surprise the webmasters at Brain Pass / PornStar Network took the issue very seriously and resolved the problem, keeping me informed the whole time. The staff at TBP were also involved and gave some excellent assistance and even contacted the webmasters too. Their issue was probably more general in that they had told people that there was a great value when joining through TBP and wanted to make sure that they weren’t steering people wrong. I’m a cynic by nature and suspect that probably 90% of the people running porn websites don’t give a rat’s ass about customer satisfaction. I read reviews and comments here all the time that support that notion. Brain Pass / PornStar Network isn’t one of those sites: they worked to resolve the issue and keep their word that TBP users would have full access. I’ll write a review soon, but my experience means that they’ve gone from being a really great site to being an excellent site. My friend and fellow PU has been informed of the change and encouraged to join again. I hope he does. Finally, this was a perfect example of how great a site that TBP is. I honestly think that the Brain Pass / PornStar Network would have resolved this issue anyway, but it felt better knowing that the TBP gang was in my corner. Thank you to all of you who made this a really positive experience. And the rest of you? If you like DVD sites with a great mix of exclusive stuff, get your ass to Brain Pass / PornStar Network. That's an order from the Admiral. | |
|
||
| 01-01-11 07:12pm - 5104 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I would add something here about discovering a few girl/girl milk enema scenes that Evil Angel did, but some of you are sensitive about that so I'll just stay quiet. | |
|
||
| 01-01-11 07:11pm - 5104 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Good-fucking-God that is an amazing scene! It ranks among my all time favs since I saw that. That scene alone is worth the membership price. | |
|
||
| 01-01-11 09:33am - 5104 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I’ve had a membership for a couple of weeks and I joined after reading that the membership issues had been resolved. The issue, as you may know, is that BP/PSN has a tiered membership that requires an additional membership within the site. The review at TBP states that when you join through TBP/PU you get a discounted price and full access to the extra stuff. I joined through TBP and I haven’t had access to the extra yet. The webmaster replied to one of my comments and said it would be resolved, but it hasn’t been. They say that I’m the only person with this problem. Are any other PornUsers current members of this site? If so, are you able to access the extra “Moviez” DVDs? | |
|
||
| 12-29-10 01:59pm - 5107 days | #10 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I figured that this thread would be a good reason to add things up. I have nine WD passport drives ranging in size from 120GB to 1TB. Adding them all together I come up with about 4.2TB. That's 95% video and 5% pics. I could cheat and add in my backups and say i have 8.4TB, but that would be cheating... | |
|
||
| 12-29-10 01:53pm - 5107 days | #13 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I've never thought of that before, but since reading it I think you're right. I've been a big Aubrey fan for a while (until she got the boob job  ) and this tidbit of information will make me look at her in a whole new light. Thanks! | |
|
||
| 12-28-10 05:58am - 5109 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm not sure if this will be of any interest, but Evil Angel has a number of anal-themed titles where the girls insert billiard balls in their asses. If that holds any interest let me know and I can provide the titles. And welcome to PornUsers. I think you'll find this an informative and entertaining site to hang around on. | |
|
||
| 12-23-10 06:22pm - 5113 days | #9 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
It's all about control! I'm a man in control. | |
|
||
| 1201-1250 of 1453 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 24 | Page 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next Page > |
|
