|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
rearadmiral (0)
|
| 1301-1350 of 1453 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 26 | Page 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next Page > |
| 09-18-10 06:56pm - 5209 days | #8 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm in the middle of reading "Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free" by Charles P. Pierce. (I should note that Piecre isn't saying 'Americans are idiots.' If he were British or German or Canadian he could have just as easily written about those countries. But one of his key points is that 'cranks' were always a big part of American life due to the free-enterprise and free speech that abounds. But he makes a clear distiction between the basically harmless cranks and the potentially dangerous nutjobs who occassionally pop up. This O'Donnell person sounds like one of the latter. | |
|
||
| 09-18-10 06:49pm - 5209 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Getting back to the original conversation, I remember having only a few wet dreams back when I was much younger. That was some of the best sex I ever had! | |
|
||
| 09-13-10 06:25pm - 5214 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks pat. I considered the RAME lists but remembered that they haven't been updated in years. But your post got me thinking that since I prefer older stuff, that shouldn't be a problem. I'll take a peek. | |
|
||
| 09-13-10 05:13pm - 5214 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I may have failed to heed Chief Wiggum’s advice to Mayor Quimby and written a check that my butt can’t cash. But luckily there’s nothing riding on it. I was having a conversation recently with a fellow porn fan and I made a statement about the ‘demographics’ of porn. The problem is that the statement I made was nothing more than a hunch. To make matters worse, it was a hunch that I really know nothing about. Or at least I know nothing about half the comparison I made. I made the statement that porn is a youth driven industry. Yes, many porn titles have nothing to do with suggesting age, but many do. I made the statement that for every title that gives the impression that the models are mature there are probably 20+ titles that give the impression of young-but-legal models. (I’m thinking terms like MILF, mature, mommy versus teen, babysitter, schoolgirl, cheerleader, etc.) But am I right? The problem that I have is that I know nothing about MILF porn but I know a lot about young-but-legal porn. Off the top of my head I started thinking of series names that suggest youthfulness and many came to mind with ease. Titles like Almost Jailbait, Anal Teen Tryouts, The Babysitter, My Favorite Babysitter, Backdoor Teens, Dream Teens, Eight Teen Tryouts, Extreme Teen, Hi Teen Club, Naughty Little Nymphos, Rated T for Teen, Teen Meat, Teen Patrol, Teen Pink and 18, Teen Tryout Auditions, Teen Worship, Teens for Cash, Terrible Teens, Barely Legal, Extreme Schoolgirls, Fresh Outta High School, School Bus Girls Brats. And those are just the SERIES names I can think of. I can’t think of any MILF titles so I consulted my vast collection and what did I find? One title – and it is Teen MILF 3. Doh! So do youth-themed porn flicks outnumber mature-oriented flicks by a huge factor or am I just blowing smoke here? (And pointing out that I’m a sick pervert will just be expressing the obvious…) | |
|
||
| 09-13-10 04:24pm - 5214 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Welcome to Pornusers, craigsname. I think you’ll find this is a friendly and useful site. A couple of things: 1) while there is nothing at all that limits discussions and reviews here to internet porn, I think the large majority of us here primarily collect internet porn. Like you, my collection was primarily DVDs until several years ago when I started to experiment with internet porn. Now my collection is 99% internet stuff. Just because we mostly collect internet porn doesn’t mean no one will help if they can think of something. 2) be patient. While there are more the 10,000 members here, only a small percentage regularly post. It might take a few days for people to respond. The lack of response in 14 hours isn’t anything to be concerned about. The PU members are not brushing you off. I posted a similar question yesterday looking for advice on specific scenes and have only had a couple of replies. Maybe tomorrow some members will reply to both of us with answers. For my case, I can tell you that the reason I’m not giving you what you’re looking for is because I plan to sift through my list of material and see if I can find something that might be of interest. Your requested material isn’t my taste, but I may have some recommendations. And the request is pretty unique and specific. If you had asked, for example, “can anyone recommend some good scenes with small-breasted chicks doing anal” my reply alone would run to several pages long. And part two would be posted tomorrow. 3) you should think about your distrust of internet porn. I’m sure that a huge number of sites out there are nothing but scams. That’s the bad news. The good news is you’ve stumbled into a pair of sites that go a long way to sorting the good from the bad. Since joining this site, and relying on the reviews here and at the sponsor site – The Best Porn – the only bad experiences I’ve had have been because I ignored warnings at TPB and here. If you’ve ever thought of joining a site that suits your tastes, check it both here and at TPB. If there is something you want to know about the site it is likely answered. If the site has a flaw, you’ll find it. If a question isn’t answered in a review, ask on the forum. 4) If you choose to stick around, I think you’ll find that this is one of the most civilized forums around. Be polite and respectful because that’s what everyone here wants. The bosses here, Khan being Le Grand Fromage, will insist that the tone be respectful. So will the regular posters. I’ll sift through my collection and see if there is anything that might be of interest to you. Again, welcome. | |
|
||
| 09-13-10 03:58am - 5215 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Slutty - Thanks for the reply. I'm not just looking for 'stars.' I'd be happy to learn about a relative unknown who tried anal onscreen a few times. I agree about Cheyenne Silver and Cassidey (aka Bobbi in some scenes). They've done a fair bit of it, and both of those girls are big favorites. And thanks for the Jenna Haze tip too. Like Taylor Rain, Lauren Phoenix and Audrey Hollander, Jenna is so virginal that she'd almost never try anal...  I'll definitely check out the names you mentioned. | |
|
||
| 09-12-10 01:08pm - 5215 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
pat362 - I'm looking for any scene at all from a woman who rarely does anal. Mid-1980s to current is my range. Thanks | |
|
||
| 09-12-10 10:58am - 5215 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I’m a big fan of anal sex scenes, but that should be no surprise to anyone who reads my reviews. One of my sub-fetishes regarding anal is tracking down scenes where models who don’t normally do anal do one or two anal scenes or maybe start anal late in their careers. Examples are April Flowers, Felix Vicious and Sunny Lane. These aren’t the anal queens like Taylor Rain or Audrey Hollander. Can anyone steer me in the direction of some other models have only done a few anal scenes or do anal only rarely? Thanks! | |
|
||
| 08-16-10 02:57pm - 5242 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Disregard the above (and PU staff may want to delete this message thread). The staff at 18XGirls responded in record time and the problem is fixed now. They didn't actually find a problem, but everything is working as it should. | |
|
||
| 08-16-10 02:49pm - 5242 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I noticed the site called 18XGirls listed on the “What’s Hot” list over at The Best Porn on August 9, 2010. A review is pending. Based on the previews at the site I joined, even though it is obviously a small site. It has some fresh looking models and I wanted to see more. But… the site isn’t delivering what’s promised. The site promised downloadable videos and hi-res photos. Neither appear to be there right now. There are links on the model’s pages where you can link to a download of the video (in wmv or mp4 formats) and a link on the photo pages to download a zip file of the hi-res photos. None (as in NONE, ZERO, NADA) of those links work. Not a fucking one of them. You can stream the videos (low res only it seems) and you can download the individual pictures but the resolution is very low. I emailed the website to report the issue and I’ll report if they tell me anything, but for now, I recommend waiting. I’m hoping that the site isn’t a scam, and I don’t think it is. There are two bonus sites that seem to work, and since TPB is preparing a review I hope they wouldn’t sit on a bad review of a potential scam. And I hope TPB wouldn’t put something on the “What’s Hot” list if there were suspicions of a scam. I’ll keep you posted, but for now keep your… um… wallets in your pants. | |
|
||
| 08-14-10 06:01pm - 5244 days | #9 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I second this position. Parodies do nothing for me. | |
|
||
| 08-14-10 05:58pm - 5244 days | #29 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
TheSquirrel: Two things: 1) please fight this. We all need to fight this. It seems download limits are being imposed in correlation with higher speeds. Hello ISPs! If you give us higher speeds, we'll use them! 2) as a TheSquirrel, would you please phone your Canadian cousin who has taken up residence in the roof of my cottage. I'll give him or her a whole bag of peanuts if they just leave. No questions asked. | |
|
||
| 08-14-10 05:54pm - 5244 days | #27 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I didn't take offence and thought that I might have mis-interpreted your post. Like most here, you're known for your decorum. I just figured that maybe the topic of download limits caused you to lose it. It does for me. | |
|
||
| 08-14-10 01:03pm - 5244 days | #22 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I didn't make that connection at all. I was just stating that in one case regulation worked (banking) and in the other it doesn't (keeping internet and cellular costs and terms reasonable). I'm making no link at all. | |
|
||
| 08-14-10 02:18am - 5245 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Hold it there, slutty. I hope you aren't making rude comments about Elizabeth Berkley and her role in Showgirls. She did more for the orange-tan-in-a-bottle crowd then any other celebrity. Some credit where it's due, please! | |
|
||
| 08-14-10 02:13am - 5245 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I suspect you mean "pure" parodies in that the plot and characters have to be similar to the original. The 1980s and early 90s were thick with movies that 'borrowed' from mainstream movies. I think they were universally bad so my brain went into self-protection mode and doesn't allow me to remember them. There is an entire sub-class (which may even be larger than the parody class) of movies that just parody a title and nothing more. "Bright Lights, Big Titties" was a favorite of mine. The title, not the movie. I'm a dedicated A-cup man and wouldn't watch that just on principle. | |
|
||
| 08-14-10 02:05am - 5245 days | #17 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Pat362 - I recall (and I may be wrong, age and alcohol will do that) that you live in Nova Scotia. If so, Bell Aliant imposes no download limits. I have a family member who works with their fibre-op department who says none are in the immediate future either. Interestingly, he says that there are no real cost advantages to fucking your customers. You're probably aware that there's been a big stink that three days after Netflix announced a Canadian service, Rogers, one of the biggest ISPs lowered their monthly limit from silly to ridiculous. Their highest speed service is now capped at 50GB per month. Netflix could prove expensive for their customers, but that's the point since it takes advertising revenue from their TV networks. I'm a fan of regulation in some areas (like banking, where partly because of regulation Canada was largely unscathed by the recession), but here the CRTC (the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission) has been licking ass. We pay some of the highest fees for wireless an online services in the world. Regulation in this area is a failure. Americans, and some Europeans, would burn down the buildings of companies who treated their customers like this. I have a can of gasoline and matches should my ISP impose limits. | |
|
||
| 08-13-10 07:28pm - 5245 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
You're probably 100% right. I guess I just don't understand the 'why' of buying porn offline. You've given some likely reasons. | |
|
||
| 08-13-10 07:26pm - 5245 days | #11 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Actually, this could be considered 'upscale' by any measure. I noted the Ashley Blue Ass while a salesman went through the virtues of several products with a male/female couple in their late 20s. The guy seemed to be interested in an Ashley Blue ass, but the salesman, in a manner unknown to me, was suggesting a "hand-held" device for a quarter of the cost. I realize that women are the primary buyer for most things, but if it was me I'd go for the full Ashley Blue bum thing. But I'll always go for a full bum thing. And if Ashley Blue has a problem with any of this, please email me and we'll work it out. | |
|
||
| 08-12-10 05:54pm - 5246 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
They certainly aim to be an upscale place, but honestly, how 'upscale' can you be when you sell replicas of Ashley Blue's ass? Nothing against Ms. Blue, of course, but we're not talking Saks Fifth Avenue here... And it makes me feel pretty proud that I can stimulate the economy while being stimulated myself. | |
|
||
| 08-12-10 05:49pm - 5246 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I never thought of it that way, but I think a fellow would have to be pretty paranoid to choose DVDs over online porn. I can leave a portable drive with 500GB of porn on it sitting on my desk for days and my bride would never ask about it. A stack of 250-300 DVDs with titles like "Ass Master Blaster" might cause her to ask a question or two. | |
|
||
| 08-12-10 04:48pm - 5246 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I know this issue has been discussed in the past a bit, but something brought this question forward for me today. I’m in Toronto, the self-described cultural capital of English-speaking Canada. Considering that I’m from a Canadian province with a population smaller than some Toronto suburbs, this city’s 2.5 million people make it seem pretty large. I’m a regular here, but I’m still always very happy to get home. But that’s not a discussion for this site… I popped in to one of the larger (and couples-friendly) adult boutiques (see, “boutiques” makes it sound so much nicer!) and on one floor they have a huge collection of DVDs for sale. All of the ones I looked at were priced at $39.99 CDN, or approximately $37 USD. All of the titles I looked at are widely available on the internet. Unless someone has been living under a rock or is completely devoid of any technical ability, how could anyone justify paying that price for a DVD? Many of the DVDs I looked at are available on sites like Videobox, which makes them a great deal. I’d bet that any of them are available on a VOD site for far less than $40. Any idea who is still buying DVDs? I ask this not knowing the answer. I’m not asking this as a rhetorical question. I honestly have no idea why a store would dedicate an entire floor to adult DVDs and sell them for $40. Someone has to be buying them. Any thoughts? BTW – not that this is a topic for this forum, but in terms of price, value, looks, safety – any measure you can think of, Toronto escorts have to be among the absolute best on the planet. Whether you agree or disagree, please send money. I guarantee you that it will be going to a good cause… ‘stimulating’ the economy. I’d go broke if I was here longer than a few days. | |
|
||
| 08-01-10 07:24am - 5258 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree that the site seems pretty healthy. Sometimes a few days go by without a lot of comments or any fresh reviews, but eventually things pick up again. I've said this several times before, but I'll continue to repeat it as often as I can: I am always impressed with the quality of the reviews here. I generally won't take a membership to a site until I read the review at TBP and here. But more than that, I'm always amazed at the level of civility here. I've been a PU for several years and a fairly regular visitor too and I can't recall any time when members got out of hand and flamed each other. Everyone here is very respectful of the site, the webmasters and each other. The irony in that is that so many anti-porn people would probably assume that we're all back-stabbers and creeps. Very little evidence of that exists on this site. Great thread GCode. Thanks for raising the issue. | |
|
||
| 07-27-10 08:31am - 5263 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Christwire isn't a bad site as Christian fundamentalist parody sites go, but for a lot of laughs my recommendation is Landover Baptist http://www.landoverbaptist.org/ That's a fairly direct satire of the Westboro Baptist site (which I won't link to those assholes...) run by Fred Phelps. God Hates Shrimp http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/ is also pretty good. Now if these religious parody sites would start to cause the real fundamentalists to rethink a few things that'd be great. | |
|
||
| 07-25-10 09:53am - 5264 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I don’t think that managing your porn collection is ‘sad’ at all. If you have a sizable collection you have to find a way to catalogue it and make it manageable if you ever hope to be able to find anything. Now it might be sad if you did all this work while dressed as Captain Kirk or labeled all your folders in Klingon. I’m not as tech-savvy as you seem to be. I’d have no idea how to create a desktop website to manage everything. My software skills are pretty limited so I rely on a Word document to track data. My collection, which is getting close to 3TB now, resides on a fleet of Western Digital Passport drives that range in size from 120GB to 750GB. Those drives are further backed up on larger external drives. I’m pretty careful about backing everything up since I’ve put a lot of time, effort and money into my hobby. I mostly download DVD scenes and I create a folder with the DVD title and then name the actual file for the female star or stars. For non-DVD websites I create a main folder using the name of the site and then I create folders or files using the name of the female star(s). So I guess you could say that I arrange my collection around the stars since I don’t really track the scenes any other way, like by director, genre, niche, etc. So that’s the way I store my collection, but I have it catalogued in a pretty simple but effective way: I created a three column Word document. The first column is the name of the DVD (or website if no DVD title – like ALS Scan or Nubiles, for example). The second column lists the name of the female star(s) and the final column is the drive number. So if I want to see Courtney Simpson in Young Cummers 3 I can simply do a word search for any of those terms and then I know which drive it’s on. I’ll admit that my system has some serious limitations, but it works for me and it has worked since I created it a long time ago. And it is probably too big a job for me to change it now. My Word document list runs to almost 110 pages in 12-point print font. The scary part for me, though, is not that I have that much porn but that I can remember most of what I have. I can’t remember birthdays and if I need more than three items at the grocery store I need to make a list, but I can remember a huge amount of my collection even without the list. All I need the list for is to tell me which drive I need to plug in. | |
|
||
| 07-20-10 04:11pm - 5269 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Stealing gets my vote too. And I take it personally when quality sites like American Vice shut down. Presuming of course that the glut of stolen porn had something to do with that. I'm proud to say that of my 3TB collection the percentage of stolen porn would be lost in rounding and it is even possible that I have none since I can't think of any I have that I didn't pay for. | |
|
||
| 07-20-10 03:01pm - 5269 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Oh yeah, I agree 100% with that. For me, it isn't all about having the porn, but finding new stuff too. And this is with having a collection that I probably haven't watched everything even once. | |
|
||
| 07-20-10 01:43pm - 5269 days | #8 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm with Bell Aliant in NB which for now imposes no download limits. Rogers does, and I read recently that Bell Canada applied for the ability to impose limits. If you have a service provider other than those two you're lucky, but if a smaller ISP buys access from one of those two then the restrictions may still be imposed. I have a family member who works for Bell Aliant who said the business case for imposing limits isn't there. That tells me that those who do impose them are just being pricks. On a related note, Netflix has said they'll be operating in Canada by the fall. I suspect a lot of new Netflix customers will learn the hard way that their ISP imposes limits when they get the bill for data over the limit. | |
|
||
| 07-20-10 03:49am - 5270 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
In Canada many (maybe most) ISPs put low monthly download limits on users that makes the issue even more difficult to deal with. If you find a site capable of 5MB/sec downloads but are then only allowed 60GB without high additional costs then the value of a high-speed service is questionable. My ISP doesn't impose limits (yet) but say that anything over 250GB per month is considered questionable. I can easily download that in a month with some decent memberships. Are download limits imposed by ISPs common in the U.S. or Europe? | |
|
||
| 07-19-10 05:54pm - 5270 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I recently upgraded my internet connection to a 10MB/sec fiber-op system. That’s the basic available with this ISP and they currently have services of up to 70MB/sec available and are planning up to 170MB/sec within a year. I don’t use the internet for much. For me, my computer is one big porn magazine that lets me also read newspapers from around the world. I’ve never found a porn site that allows greater than 2MB/sec download. What on earth would someone do with a 70 or even 170 MB/sec connection? What kind of sites and what kind of material is available at those speeds? | |
|
||
| 07-12-10 07:06pm - 5277 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Jesus messmer... I sure see what you mean now. I've had a membership for a few VERY frustrating days and in that time have only been able to download a few scenes. Right now I'm consistently getting great speeds. The downside is that it is late here and I gotta get to bed soon. Hmmm... porn or sleep, porn or sleep... | |
|
||
| 07-12-10 07:03pm - 5277 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Amen to that, Pat! My wife claims the show is about romance. There is nothing romantic about it. Most of the people involved seem shallow and self-centred and only in it for the media exposure. At least porn isn't hypocritical about being shallow. It is what it is. | |
|
||
| 07-12-10 06:49pm - 5277 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm not technically adept, but that description makes a lot of sense and was my basic understanding too. But I think that if this is the issue, and it likely is, then Porn.com still deserves to be chastised. I agree with messmer when he noted that it is either feast or famine with this site. Since taking a membership last week I have been able to download about five scenes at a decent speed. Just a few minutes ago, for example, I downloaded a scene at 2+MB/sec. That's an excellent speed for most sites. Then I tried downloading a second scene figuring that while there is a light load I might actually get some value from the membership. I saw download speeds below 20KB/sec. But I just tried again and I'm at 1MB/sec. Isn't there a better way for a site to address capacity issues? Why not cap download speeds at 1MB/sec? That way instead of one person downloading at 3MB/sec three could download. I suspect that Porn.com doesn't get a lot of repeat business. They won't from me. | |
|
||
| 07-09-10 11:19am - 5280 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I just took a membership to Porn.com. I downloaded two scenes and had no problems. The downloads speeds were approximately 1MB/sec. Then I tried a third scene (several times), then a fourth (several times) and a fifth (several times)... And the best I could get for a download speed was about 100kb/sec. On several attempts the download speeds was BELOW 20kb/sec. Reviewers are all over the map with this site, and even the long-time PU reviewers seem mixed. Any thoughts, or should I have saved my $9.99? | |
|
||
| 07-05-10 06:54pm - 5284 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
So my wife has been watching this inane show called “The Bachelorette.” For those of you blissfully unaware of it and its premise, 25 sociopaths vie for the opportunity to marry a young, attractive woman. As the series progresses she gets to eliminate some of her suitors. The whole premise is twisted reality TV crap. So… why not make it a one-show series where these obviously-lying goons court the young lady, thereby hooking in the female viewers, and then conclude the show with an all-anal, 25 guy gang bang? I think that’s something I could watch. I’d even sit through the chick-friendly stuff. | |
|
||
| 07-04-10 03:12pm - 5285 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Same here. Videobox certainly fits the size description except I wouldn't call it "amateurish" or "badly designed." My guess is the Adult Bouncer network. It claims a lot of videos though many of those are duplicates. Many, if not most, of the sites on that network can, if you're being charitable, be described as having an amateurish network and being badly designed. AB also has some older stuff. | |
|
||
| 06-21-10 04:09am - 5299 days | #13 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
turboshaft: I realize now that my addition of an example was misleading. I wasn't adding the details of this woman I saw as an example of the perfect woman. Or maybe I was, since she seemed pretty perfect to me. (Which might answer my underlying question...) Personally, red or strawberry blonde hair does it for me (it must be an attraction to other Scots-Irish people!). But maybe there are so many variables that nothing can be considered universal. | |
|
||
| 06-21-10 04:05am - 5299 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'll volunteer to start the ass research immediately! It's the least I can do to give back to society.  | |
|
||
| 06-20-10 04:44pm - 5299 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Not to drag a thread I started down a different path, but I remain impressed at how friendly this site is. I've posted at a few other sites (non-porn) and amazed at how quickly a thread will disintegrate into name-calling and stuff like that. I read most of the threads on this forum and could probably count on one hand the number of times that I've seen the discussion get nasty in several years. There are a lot of different tastes and opinions on this site but everyone seems to get along very well and are always respectful. Maybe there is some link between being a porn user and civility that the churches have been hiding all these years.  | |
|
||
| 06-20-10 10:51am - 5299 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I know that there are bound to be variations in what guys like, but it seems to me that most men would be genetically predisposed to be attracted to the most fertile of ladies. Removing the exceptions of people who are attracted to extremely large women or the elderly, does that mean that there may be a near ‘universal’ woman? With allowances for some cultural variations, of course. Or maybe I’m just blowing smoke up my own ass on this. It seems that this may have even changed over time and probably based on external conditions. If paintings are to be believed, the Rubenesque woman may have had quite a following in some places in the 16th and 17th Centuries. Today we’d know her as a BBW. Maybe a full-figured woman back then was a better indicator of fertility since she had more access to food that her skinny peasant sisters lacked. That seems reasonable. But it seems to me, based on nothing more than a vast experience of porn (which I assume is driven by what people want) and asking friends, that there are some at least cultural universal traits. Young (18-30 depending on the age of the guy being asked) seems near universal. Thin seems to be a common desire. Not necessarily athletic thin, but not carrying around a bunch of extra weight either. And this is something that I can’t quantify, but most attractive women seem to have “softer” more feminine features. Arguing against me on this is the fact that there are so many variations on preference. I like women on the petite side of things where some guys like 6’ tall women. Skin color matters for some people. Breast size seems to be a polarizing feature too. I’d add ass size to that. I love a small, firm bum, but I know that many prefer a girl with “back.” So are there any female features or attributes that a big majority of us would see as indicating beauty in a woman? BTW – I thought of this at lunch a couple of days ago when I met a woman who, it seemed to me, would be attractive to all the male population who weren’t 100% gay or hooked up to life-support systems in a hospital. She was about 22, blonde, petite, maybe 5’2” to 5’4”. Thin but not skinny, but not overly athletic looking, breast size is proportional and her cup size was probably a B. She seems to have nice legs and, for me as an ass-man, her bum is a masterpiece – tight and firm looking. Mmmmmmm...  | |
|
||
| 06-20-10 10:20am - 5299 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Interesting thread... A pet peeve of mine are websites from companies that have more money than God and still do a crappy job. I noted this was a serious problem with the Hustler site when I had a membership there. Hustler has to be one of the biggest porn companies on the planet yet their website has a cheap, amateur feel to it - and not in a good way. This morning I was thinking about the possibility of joining the Private.com site because I really like most of their movies. They are a large company with the material and resources to do a website right. But according to recent reviews of the site posted here, they haven't put the effort into the website and it shows. Don't these companies recognize that the internet is here to stay and that it is eventually (if not already) going to be the primary means of distrubuting their product? | |
|
||
| 06-19-10 07:23pm - 5300 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I just tried it with my laptop and it loaded fine. So the problem is definitely with my PC. Does anyone have any recommendations on what it could be? I've surfed porn for a long time and never not been able to load a page. Thanks | |
|
||
| 06-19-10 07:13pm - 5300 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I tried it there and through Google. It seems odd that this one page wouldn't load properly. I'm not technical enough to know why there would be a conflict with this site and my PC. Thanks for the direction though. I'll try it through my laptop maybe. | |
|
||
| 06-19-10 03:06pm - 5300 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Last weekend the Jules Jordan site was listed in the “What’s Hot” section at The Best Porn. I check out every site that they list there but I couldn’t get this one to load. I tried again just now, a week later, and the site still doesn’t load. Anyone else experienced this or is it just me? If it isn’t just me, it doesn’t say much for the site. | |
|
||
| 06-19-10 08:29am - 5301 days | #17 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Good God, yes! I just used that as a way to express my love of smaller breasts while poking fun at right-wing religious nuts too. | |
|
||
| 06-16-10 04:55pm - 5303 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I would never have guessed that there could be men so odd as this. | |
|
||
| 06-16-10 03:26pm - 5303 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I know this is a polarizing debate here and on many websites and I have no intention of reopening the same debate. I just wondered about a specific detail on breast size and implants. I recall many years ago that a friend of mine went to see a stripper in Montreal who was famous for having enormous implants. These things, as I recall from the Polaroid photo he paid to have taken with her, were probably a bit bigger than basketballs. And she otherwise looked like a woman with normal proportions. They looked awful.  But he was fascinated by them.So are there breast-men out there who are really into extra-large breasts? Yes, I realize that the stripper in Montreal was more revered for her sideshow-like boobs than her femininity, but for those of you who like large breasts (either real or fake, and I realize that these are often different groups) is there such a thing as being too large? In the interest of honesty, I LOVE small breasts and I’m not sure how I’d respond to someone who asked me if there was a possibility of a woman’s breasts being too small. Maybe, but probably not. And as an aside, I’m thinking of forming a group for men who are opposed to breast implants. My proposal is that we take a page from the anti-abortion crowd. We picket clinics where breast implants are done and try to persuade the girls that they are making a terrible, immoral choice and that every breast, no matter how small, is a loved breast. We can push for a constitutional amendment banning breast implants. Anyone in? | |
|
||
| 06-15-10 03:49pm - 5304 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I can't name a website that features this, but there is a DVD title with a decent scene like you describe. It's Shane's World College Invasion 1. The Shane's World series is pretty good if you're not already a fan, though the earlier stuff is better than the later stuff. The College Invasion sub-series might be of some interest since there is some activity (handjobs, oral and some fucking) between well-known female pornstars and unknown college frat boys. The biggest problem with this whole premise is that yur have to put up with a lot of drunk, stupid frat boys yelling "Woooooo... wooooo" at the top of their lungs. I honestly wonder if any of these guys ever amounted to anything... But I digress. In College Invasion 1 there is a scene with an unknown guy where he goes on a date with Cindy Crawford and Mariah Cherry. The purpose of the date is so he can choose which hot chick to fuck. This is a dilemma I face all the time so I can feel some sympathy for this guy  The scene gets sexier and sexier with the girls having to do a striptease and then demonstrate their oral skills before this lucky bastard gets to choose. It's a decent scene and sounds like what you're looking for. The problem would be getting a copy. If you search it on IAFD you'll find lots of links to VOD and Download to Own sites but that is relatively expensive. As an aside, in Shane's World College Invasion 2 Eva Angelina appears in one of her first videos with the same scenario. She has two porn guys trying to win her over and she gets to pick one to fuck her. That's a decent scene to see a very-new Eva Angelina. | |
|
||
| 06-15-10 02:27pm - 5304 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree with the Capn on this one. I've seen a lot of porn in my life and I think the expectation was that you ask or she offer to give you a hand. Or more. Several videos lead me to believe that the natural outcome to such a beginning would conclude with anal sex. Seriously though, as long as you're not Catholic, masturbation shouldn't be a hang-up in 2010. It's as natural and normal and common as breathing. | |
|
||
| 06-14-10 01:45pm - 5305 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
 | |
|
||
| 1301-1350 of 1453 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 26 | Page 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next Page > |
|
