Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: rearadmiral (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1453)  |   Threads Started (206)

1351-1400 of 1453 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 8 14 20 27 Page 28 29 30 Next Page >

06-13-10  05:00pm - 5306 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
The Best Porn (TPB) has a listing of all the sites they reviewed that have full access trials which is pretty useful for finding a site that may interest you. There are currently almost 2000 sites listed with full-access trials. Go to TPB and look at the menue list on the left of the page, click on "Special Interests" and the full trials are the first in the list on that page. Happy hunting!

06-12-10  08:52pm - 5307 days #15
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


Why don't they let out Dr. Kevorkian?...he's done a hell've lot more for humanity......Law enforcment..go figure


I'm not sure if what you mean is sarcasm, but if not, I'm in full agreement with you. My own death is one of the last things I can have control over. If I ever get a daignosis of terminal whatever I'll take matters into my own hands. The sad thing is that any choice I can make is limited due to right-wing fundies. The choices are difficult for me and messy for those left behind. I'd far rather if there was a Dr. Kevorkian willing to make it more simple and humane.

Fuck I hate fundamentalists...

M

06-12-10  10:16am - 5308 days #12
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


The funny thing is that it was an undercover FBI agent that ordered the Max video's to be shipped to Florida. That smells of entrapment but like you said. Once the Government wants you. They can bend the law to get you.

I actually think that he was a target because he was the easiest one to go after. I was a big fan of Max's older material but what he produced in the last few years was not my idea of good porn. He did push a lot of boundaries and because of what he did. His head stuck above everyone elses when it came to being pretty easy to sway a jury.


I recall seeing a documentary on Tommy Chong's arrest and eventual conviction on shipping water bongs across a state line into a state where they were prohibited. That was almost certainly a case of entrapment since the "customer" set Chong up so that the only way his business could continue was to ship this order.

Governments prosecuting morality crimes really pisses me off. Unless its my morality that they're enforcing, and then I'm fine with it, of course

As for Max being beyond the U.S. law by being in Europe, that may also come with some risks. The U.S. does have a history of getting whatever they want regardless of international law. An extreme example, and not entirely applicable I realize, is the invasion of Panama to "arrest" Manuel Noriega. A Canadian was recently extradicted to the U.S. because he had a lawful business in Canada selling marijuana seeds by mail. He shipped to Americans and though his business was legal in Canada and he never actually did business in the U.S. they put out a warrant for him. The sad thing is that the Canadian justice system just rolled over and played ball.

There's another Canadian who from ran an online gambling site from the Cayman Islands. He took business from U.S. customers and that got him arrested in Canada (for something that isn't a crime in Canada and where the servers were in the Caymans) and shipped to the U.S. where he may still be doing time. That's even weirder since gambling is legal under some circumstances.

If max does go back to producing new content, I wonder if he'll pull back. I find with Max's stuff that I've seen it's like watching a train wreck - you know there's gonna be carnage, but you can't help but watch. He's a strange man.

06-12-10  10:06am - 5308 days #11
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I think that Max has only 2 choices. He can either move to Europe where the laws that found him guilty don't exist or he can choose to do only internet content.


I wasn't aware that there was an internet loophole. It must be that the criminal laws under which Max was convicted were old enough that they only covered physical things like books and DVDs. Interesting...

06-09-10  03:59pm - 5310 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


When Max Hardcore gets out of jail, will he simply move to Europe and pick up where he left off?

Or is this even possible? I haven’t followed the case too closely, but would the feds have seized all his material or can the U.S. government just seize the copyright? It seems to me that Max could pretty much get back in business mere days after getting out of prison if he wanted. Probably within a short period of time he could be producing new stuff again. Of course he’d never be able to go home for Christmas again, but maybe he could have Christmas dinner with Roman Polanski.

Any thoughts on what Max may or would even be able to do? Or has his time in the sun faded now with no chance of a comeback?

06-09-10  04:23am - 5311 days #4
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


The closest thing to reality porn I've seen are the casting videos by Pierre Woodman. That guy is amazing in his ability to persuade young girls to perform sex on camera. Many of the girls are first-time models for porn, and some of them have gone on to become famous.


I agree. What these scenes give up in technical perfection they more than make up for in how hot they are. Seeing these new models really early in their careers when they are nervous and a bit clumsy is amazing. Good call on this one lk2fireone!

06-08-10  08:50am - 5312 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I recently joined Porn Star Legends and quite like the site. I'm more into 80s and early 90s stuff but they do have some 70s stuff. They offer a three day full trial so that may be worth trying to see if there is much there that you'd like. It's probably worth the risk.

One thing to note is there is only American stuff here.

I'll likely post a full review of the site soon.

06-08-10  08:47am - 5312 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Does anyone have any ideas as to why? I know some people posted some plausible answers in another thread, but does anyone have any other ideas? They were an excellent site - in my opinion probably the best of the DVD sites. My guess is that in that market you can't always put quality before quantity. AV had some studios that the others didn't and even though there was some overlap with sites like Video Box, I think that AV did it better. The problem is that while VB uploads 5 videos a day (many poor to mediocre) AV only uploaded one (that was generally good). That may have had something to do with it.

Maybe it was the fact that they moved away from .wmv files, which although they have their flaws they are probably the most usable by the most number of people. I always converted them to wmv because the format only played in QuickTime and I just don't like QuickTime. It's probably the only Apple product that is inferior to Microsoft.

Or maybe the cost of licencing good videos went up. One poster in the other thread said that the quality of videos had dropped.

One thing though, I think it is a testiment to the fact the AV was a quality site that they took it down instead of still luring in customers to a dying site.

Bottom line for me is that I'll miss them.

06-06-10  08:41am - 5314 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


About two months ago I developed this new infatuation with Veronica Jett. Sure, she’s exactly what I look for in a model: petite, small-breasted, young, out-going, and likes anal. But for the longest while I simply noted her in passing and went on looking for other models. I don’t know why my opinion changed, but now I’m on the hunt for more Veronica.

Pretty much the same thing with Hailey Young. I never paid too much attention to her until I saw her in an episode of American Gokkun and realized how nasty she can be. Since them I’ve been busy adding as much Hailey to my harddrive as I can find.

This contrasts with other models who the first time I saw them it was lust at first sight. Tammi Ann in Max Hardcore’s The Hitchhiker, Inari Vachs in Whack Attack, Taylor Rain in Just Over 18 3, Jenna Haze in Just Over 18 2, Teagan Presley in Cum Drippers 6. Each of these scenes is burned in my memory and spurred me on to find as much of their material as I could.

So has this ever happened to you? Have you ever “discovered” a new favorite porn star who had been right in front of you the whole time?

06-06-10  08:35am - 5314 days #13
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Wittyguy and nostromo - thanks for the tips. I've taken the tours at both sites and they seem to have a lot to offer. I suspect that be pulling out the credit card on both of them soon.

06-05-10  10:28am - 5315 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I ran into the same issue when I wrote a review of Society SM. At one time it was a stand-alone site with the parent company having several other sites too. They started offering all sites for one membership. I did a full review of Society SM and put a fairly detailed mini-review in the comments sections of Fucking Dungeon, Cum Bots, Perfect Slave and Strict Restraint. I also noted in the comments that there was a full review with more detail at Society SM. That seemed to work.

06-01-10  04:29pm - 5318 days #9
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I recommend having a look at HDporn. It has a decent tour and a 2-day full-access trial (according to TBP) will only set you back $5.

The 168 Hi Def videos are really excellent quality. They also have photosets that include pics (in zips) usually at 2048 as well as 1024. (They put pics of both sizes in the zips, side by side.)

If you join, be sure to uncheck the auto checked "*$1.91 1-day trial to BestInternetXXX.com."

And by the way, this site has the BEST Jenna Haze hardcore I have ever seen (Nov. 28, 2009). Probably the best hardcore scene ever made, at least for a guy like me who loves that belly-down flat vaginal sex. The camera angle is great and the action is really good (esp. Jenna). It's a little over 3 minutes long, but it's so good that time just stands still! (When you're completely enthralled, you don't think about the passing of time.)

The $5 is worth that alone, IMHO.

Addendum: That Jenna Haze scene is a LOT longer than 3 minutes. I was only talking about the BEST damn 3 minutes in it, from my own POV.


Drooler (sorry for calling you Denner earlier... I'd blame it on new reading glasses but the stupidity isn't new...) - thanks again for the tip. Based on your suggestion I took out a month membership to HDPorn and so far I like it. Also based on your suggestion the first scene I downloaded was the Jenna haze one you named. You're right that it is an excellent scene and the belly-down-flat position is a favorite with me too.

Again, I'm grateful for the tip.

Does anyone else reading this thread have any recommendations? Any tips will be appreciated.

05-31-10  05:27pm - 5319 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I recommend having a look at HDporn. It has a decent tour and a 2-day full-access trial (according to TBP) will only set you back $5.

The 168 Hi Def videos are really excellent quality. They also have photosets that include pics (in zips) usually at 2048 as well as 1024. (They put pics of both sizes in the zips, side by side.)

If you join, be sure to uncheck the auto checked "*$1.91 1-day trial to BestInternetXXX.com."

And by the way, this site has the BEST Jenna Haze hardcore I have ever seen (Nov. 28, 2009). Probably the best hardcore scene ever made, at least for a guy like me who loves that belly-down flat vaginal sex. The camera angle is great and the action is really good (esp. Jenna). It's a little over 3 minutes long, but it's so good that time just stands still! (When you're completely enthralled, you don't think about the passing of time.)

The $5 is worth that alone, IMHO.


Denner - Thanks for this tip. I suspect that I'll at least give the trial a try but I may just go for the full month since it seems reasonably priced. I never really looked at HD sites much before because my old internet connection was slow, but that's been upgraded.

From the sounds of it you have a membership - if so, are you aware of daily download limits?

Thanks again. I appreciate the tip.

05-31-10  04:24pm - 5319 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


I don't have any suggestions but have to inform you that American Vice shut down about a week ago! They were decent enough to send all their members an email promising a refund later on.


Noooooo!!! They were an excellent site and seemed to be run by people who understood customer service. Maybe that's why they couldn't compete in the sleazy world of online porn.

One thing I always liked about them was that they didn't carry just the same stuff the other DVD sites have. Sure, there was overlap, but not as much as you'd expect.

This is terrible news!

05-31-10  01:33pm - 5319 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


This is the first time that this has happened to me in the many years of downloading porn: I can’t find any sites that I want to join. It isn’t time for me to join Video Box again yet (with some recent changes and a reduction in anal themed movies a membership there is only worthwhile once a year). It isn’t time to join American Vice again either. They are very high quality but only update once a year. I’ve been through several public nudity sites recently and many of those don’t update regularly so there is no reason to go back this soon. I spent some time at FTV Girls and looked at a lot of that. (A very impressive site.) Same with ALS Scan and ALS Angels. I’m not big into sites like these but I really liked these and recognize the effort that goes into them. I’ve had recent memberships to several of my favorite Kink.com websites so there aren’t yet enough updates to justify going back just yet. I even tried some strange sites like Ass Smoothie and Swirly Girls to see what they were like.

So here I sit with no active memberships. This is very unusual. Does anyone have any suggestions that they can make? I like DVD sites like Video Box and American Vice but I find that many of them obviously share the same material. I say I don’t like solo / softcore stuff, but every time I get a membership to a site like ALS Angels, ALS Scan or FTV Girls I really like it, so maybe I’m just denying it to myself. (And I still think that Brooke Skye was the best looking girl on the internet when here site was live and updating…) I had a membership to Nubiles maybe five years ago and that was good. There was a bit of hardcore on there and according to reviews there is more now. Having an anal and ass fixation might make a membership at Ass Traffic a good bet since I haven’t had one in over five years, but I prefer U.S. porn. That isn’t being anti-European, it’s just that I like to be able to locate more material of a girl I like and sometimes that’s hard with European sites who change the names of the models.

Yes, I know that this is a highly personalized choice, but does anyone have any suggestions? Please help! VISA will call soon and ask if I died or found religion.

05-30-10  12:31pm - 5320 days #16
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I'll cast my vote for condoms being a turn-off. I can't really explain why, but they seem to drop the heat level of a scene for me.

05-28-10  04:25pm - 5322 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by mbaya:


I just looked and fifty (50) reviews are listed. I feel the number is still small, but not 4.


I stand corrected. I simply looked at the number of reviews listed under the gay niche. I didn't actually go in and look at them. My bad...

05-28-10  01:21pm - 5322 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I was thinking about this the other day when I was at TPB and was looking in the “What’s Hot Archive.” One of the sites featured there was Bel Ami Online. The photo in the link was of a person sitting on a kitchen counter. I didn’t look closely, but I assumed that the person in the photo was a skinny, semi-goth-like, short-haired, A-cup, trailer-trashy woman. Just my kind! So I clicked on the link and discovered that the person in the photo was a guy. Oops. Bel Ami Online turns out to be an Eastern European gay site. I’m into small breasts, which these guys obviously have, but they lack the curves and lady bits that I’m pretty partial to.

So due to this mistake I checked to see how many gay sites are reviewed here at PU and was surprised to see that there aren’t many. There are only four sites reviewed here by us PU-ers. This is contrasted with 45 transsexual sites. Maybe I’m making a mistake comparing those two categories. I can’t claim to understand either interest but I’m happy to share space with them. (I also noted that even below gay sites are cheerleader sites. There are no cheerleader site reviews on PU! What’s up with that? I’ll have to see about finding some cheerleader sites and posting some reviews. Mmmmm… cheerleaders…)

So this got me to wondering where the gay PU members are. I don’t ever recall seeing a gay review here and I’m not sure how I’d react. But there is nothing about this site that says any member has to review straight sites only. Are we unwelcoming? Would a gay person drop in here and figure that we don’t want them? Maybe we don’t, I don’t know. This contrasts starkly with TPB which reviews gay sites.

I’m not saying I’d like to see PU flooded with gay reviews (nor would I want to see it flooded with fat-chick site reviews either…) but where are our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters? (I guess the lesbian crowd would probably not want to hang out here, notwithstanding all the great reviews of porn featuring all types of women. I’m sure we’re a little too heavy on the testosterone for them.)

Any thoughts?

05-25-10  05:37pm - 5325 days #23
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


A big difference, yes...but the sheer nature of forcing one's penis into an un-natural orifice walled with fecal matter in my mind is logically a bit disturbing...I don't care how you cut it.
The fact it's generally an accepted practice and obviously important to a large segment of people, certainly gets no objection from me as to it's stand in a sexual environment.
I appreciate your deplomatic approach in defense of an opposing view.

[QUOTE=turboshaft]

Graymane1777, though you're certainly entitled to your opinion, I would say there is a big difference between the taboo of anal sex and the taboo of changing species.


Two words: Fleet Enema.

05-25-10  01:49pm - 5325 days #8
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I can't imagine that there is a big fan base for this. Of all the people I know who watch porn no one has ever expressed and interest in this kind of material. And in Canada, where I live, it is also illegal. I'm not sure about the U.S. and Europe though.

05-09-10  03:58pm - 5341 days #7
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Well, I'll be the odd man out in this debate and weigh in on the side of facials. Facials are just an extension of the industry's need to show that the sex was real - otherwise all we'd have are internal cumshots and a guy could fake that. External cumshots have been a mainstay of the business for as long as I can remember. I suspect facials were started as a means of humiliation or one-upping the competition, but they're here to stay. I don't watch a lot of couples-oriented material, but you may find that there are fewer facials in those.

It's all just part of the fantasy. So to answer your question "are facials really necessary," I'd say yes. Yes they are. Otherwise, to quote Cleveland from last week's Cleveland Show, porn would end with the guy lying in bed with the girl and “holding in farts and listening to story after story about her funny co-workers…” I think I’ll stick with facials.

05-09-10  10:44am - 5341 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I have no experience with this since my ISP has never imposed limits on the amount of data I bring down every month. But... I've heard that it could be coming soon.

Is capping your allowable monthly downloading a common thing in the industry? It just seems like a big money grab to me. The argument that they're making is that it is in the interests of fairness. If you have a kid who is stealing movies who downloads 200GB a month that causes everyone else to have a slower service. That's their argument.

It seems to me that if you have a decent download speed then you could use up your limit pretty quick. My wife has discovered watching TV shows online, and with my downloading "hobby" we could have some trouble - and big bills.

Anyone else have any experience with this? I should point out that I'm in Canada so I don't know if this is a trend in the U.S., Asia and Europe too

05-08-10  04:16pm - 5342 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


Yeah, I know that it is boring, but the adult industry has produced a short PSA on the veils of piracy. It's interesting to see some stars in their "natural" state. And the message is important too.

I found it at this link (though I'm not sure how to post links in the forum...

http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_...-against-piracy.html

05-08-10  10:56am - 5342 days #14
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Ah, a thread I can’t keep quiet about… okay, bad pun. I agree with you guys – the silly and constant noises some pornstars make are very annoying. If we’re thinking of awarding a prize for annoying noises my nomination goes to the twin sisters who go by various names such as The Milton Twins, Cali and Kylie Marie, and sometimes Cherish. From the second someone touches either of them it is a steady stream of “oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh… You get the point. To make matters worse, both of them make the exact same noise and the sound and pitch never change.

04-15-10  03:45am - 5366 days #6
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I'll come out of the closet on this one...

04-14-10  06:36pm - 5366 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Thanks justme. See what you have to look forward to when you're an old geezer? Your brain, eyes, and other important things start to fall apart...

04-14-10  02:06pm - 5366 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I stumbled on a short video clip of Eden Adams doing some public nudity. The clip is available on many sites and is usually labeled "Eden Adams Playing Around in Public." None of the sites list where the original source is for this clip. Can anyone offer any insight? Is it from a DVD or is it from a website? Anyone know a title? I'd like to source the original.

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks!

BTW - I would have linked the clip but I didn't for 2 reasons: 1) I don't know how, and 2) I don't want to direct anyone to a site that gives away pirated porn (and not all the sites that have this clip appear to be pirated stuff).

04-01-10  06:26pm - 5379 days #27
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
For me it would be Tammi Ann and Inari Vachs. And yes, I know that's two, but they both have A-cup breasts so for most guys I can add those together to make one.

04-01-10  02:04pm - 5379 days #10
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I remember stumbling on the Real Doll website a while back. As creepy as it may seem to some, if my wife left me or something happened to her, I think a Real Doll would be a great thing to have. I have no idea what the Border Agency would think though... The post office staff used to pre-read some magazines I subscribed to, so maybe I'd want to hose out my new honey when she arrived.

03-31-10  01:34pm - 5380 days #14
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I have within me an almost limitless capacity to accept persons who are different from me and ideas that I do not share. Having said that, I go from zero to insanely-borderline-violent-crazy when I hear the whacky religious nuts drone on.

I think the one big difference is that while they demand that I accept and tolerate them, their ideas, if widely accepted, would not give me (and the rest of us at PU) the same courtesy.

And I think it's fitting that we comment on fundies as we prepare to celebrate the time when our Lord rose from the dead and, with the help of rabbits, distributed chocolates to the Chosen People. At least that's what I've been able to figure out.

03-31-10  01:27pm - 5380 days #4
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Probably not a new one for female masturbation, but for an old geezer like me when I heard it I almost peed my pants laughing: Jilling off.

03-30-10  04:24pm - 5381 days #29
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I’m not sure where I stand in the debate over degrading women in porn. Well, actually I do know where I stand, but that may appear to shift depending on your perspective.

I’m generally anti-degrading women in porn. It isn’t a turn on for me. I agree with some of you (at least I think that some alluded to this) that this is a bit of a generational thing. It seems some of the ‘reality’ sites go for degradation in a big way. The woman is merely a prop on which the guy can flex his muscles – literally and figuratively. For me, this is the opposite of the way I like my porn. I think the guy is just a stage prop and his focus should be on doing everything he can to make the girl better on camera. Males should shut up and be seen as little as possible.

This degradation thing seems to have been going on for a long time though. I remember hearing a lot of buzz when Anabolic released “Rough Sex” way back in 1999. I suspect that their plan was to release this as a series like they do with so many other titles, but they got such pushback after “Rough Sex 2” that they dropped the idea. The issue (as I recall it) is that the series’ entire aim was to be verbally and physically abusive toward the women and then fuck them in a verbally and physically abusive way. That crossed a line in mainstream porn when it came out, and still comes close to crossing a line. I think the issue was that many of the women seemed ill-informed of what was going to happen. The most notorious crisis was when Regan Starr broke down in tears at the start of her scene – and the editors chose to leave that in. My recollection was that Anabolic eventually pulled the series, but either my recollection is wrong or they’ve changed their minds since I’ve seen it available on some VOD sites.

Anyway, all that to say that I don’t support the degrading tone much porn takes towards women, BUT… as a fan of BDSM stuff I have to make a case as to why BDSM can’t be lumped in with some of the degrading crap that is out there.

I know a lot of PU members are fans of softcore stuff. I am too, so I get that. But if that is all you’re in to, then I can understand you thinking that BDSM is degrading. But it isn’t when done right. Yes, the women are bound, and often flogged or caned and sometimes even degraded. But it is done within the context of consensual BDSM play. BDSM for the sub is a means of exploring the interest of being immobilized or bound, and made to submit to someone else. The men or women who are dominant when this stuff is done right are not degrading the women, unless that is part of the consensual play.

There are sites that do BDSM very well. Any site within the Kink Network (The Training of O, Sex and Submission, Device Bondage) or Dungeoncorp (Society SM, Perfect Slave, Fucking Dungeon) may not be to your liking, but they are not degrading. I think the difference between sites like Kink and Dungeoncorp versus some of the reality sites is that the former degrade specific women in consensual BDSM play for the benefit of that woman who enjoys that role play. The latter, the reality sites, just treat the women as extras and use that one model to demonstrate their disdain for women generally.

Anyway, this was too long and rambling, and even a bit off-topic, but to sum up: not all rough or degrading porn is equal. You may not like it, but there is good stuff out there.

03-23-10  05:41pm - 5388 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I think most of us here find this annoying since it seems to be raised as a ‘con’ in many reviews. A site has various scenes available for download but the complete scene is broken down into several smaller files. Why do sites do this? If it is a 100MB scene and they break it down into 4 25MB pieces, aren’t the vast majority of users going to download every piece for the complete scene? So the bandwidth for the site is no different is it? Surely there can’t be that many low-speed internet users still around that the sites are making it easier for them.

Thoughts?

03-16-10  05:03pm - 5395 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
That's my understanding. The WD site says that it is hardware based, so I think the only way to run it is with some key.

03-15-10  03:30pm - 5396 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


Questions about portable harddrives usually generate a lot of discussion here. Western Digital seems to be a common brand with a lot of people liking them and some not. I have 7 in total where I store my collection and have never had a problem. My question is specific though: does anyone here have any experience with a new WD drive with the hardware-based encryption? How does it work? Is it relatively easy to use? Does it make the drive run a lot slower? Is there a problem running video off the drive with the encryption? Is the interface easy to use?

Thanks for any advice and assistance.

03-13-10  02:28pm - 5398 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Count me in on this too, provided that the rest fo the person's platform was reasonably sensible. But realistically, in most places this would be just throwing your vote away.

03-13-10  02:27pm - 5398 days #4
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I’ve heard this argument before (mostly in the comments when a b/b/g scene is posted on Videobox) and I honestly don’t understand it. I’m not a big fan of scenes where there are more than a guy and a girl, though I’ve never thought that I might be secretly gay just because I happen to find a Private scene with a hot EE girl taking on two guys to be a turn on. Frankly, I find some EE models so hot I’d watch them pretty much regardless of how many guys they were working with. And when it was over, I probably couldn’t tell you anything about the guys in the scene.

For me, the guys, regardless of how many there are, are just part of the set design. I’m not really looking at them. Multi-guy porn scenes are common in U.S. porn too, though not as common as in EE porn, but I don’t think that’s a comment on Europe. Most porn tries to be fantasy, and maybe a lot of people like that as a fantasy. Just considering it briefly, I can see that at least two fantasies could be served by having multiple guys on one girl. The obvious one is that the viewer may fantasize about being in a three-way with another couple. The second one is that maybe the viewer likes the fantasy of seeing such a sexually open and liberated girl that her sexuality can handle multiple guys. That may be the sign of a sexually strong woman for some.

As for the “if I enjoy this, I must be bi or gay,” I don’t buy it. My own sex life is pretty vanilla, but my take on it is that anything that a guy and girl get up to can’t, by definition, be gay. If a couple has a thing where he dresses in lingerie and she dons a strap-on and fucks him, that’s still not gay. Not my thing, but not gay either. What would cross the line in the scenes you’re talking about is if the guys start to touch each other or if they start going at it while the girl sits back, that probably crosses the line into gay.

On a related note, while I’m not a big fan of TS stuff, of the thousands of hardcore scenes I have, maybe two or three scenes are TS stuff, and only because there was something in each scene that intrigued me. That doesn’t make me gay. But I will say that with TS stuff, I’m pretty selective (considering it makes up maybe one-tenth of one percent of my collection…): I’m fine with the TS going down on the guy, and fine if the guy fucks the TS, but if any of that is reversed, I’m outta there. So maybe rather than worrying about being gay, I really should worry that I’m homophobic…

03-09-10  04:51pm - 5402 days #17
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


rearadmiral, if you want a date with Sasha Grey, you better be in shape. Else she will probably beat you up and spit all over you. That seems to be the type of action she goes for. . Lol. Great-looking gal, but too violent for me.


Well, 44 isn't too late to try new things is it? With Sasha at the giving end of the slap, spit, splat, curse-curse I might have a new fetish.

Awww... who am I kidding? I already have that fetish! Does anyone have Sasha's number?

03-09-10  03:39pm - 5402 days #10
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by atrapat:


Also take into account whether you are connecting to the router through wireless; then, the bottleneck will most likely be in the wireless system even if you got the 75Mbps fiber-optic connection.

802.11g advertises as 54Mbps but real life speed is less than half of that. You might not even get to 20Mbps. 802.11n will likely suffer from the same issues so a 75Mbps fiber-optic with wireless wouldn't be worth it with the current wireless technology.


Thanks for bringing the point up. It is certainly an important consideration. If I swap my PC for a laptop later this year like I'm planning, I may surf wirelessly but I'll only download with a wired link.

03-09-10  03:35pm - 5402 days #15
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I'll leave it to you guys to discuss getting it on with a half-woman, half-fish. That's not a fantasy of mine.

To answer turboshaft's question, my initial response was "hell, yes!" But then I thought about it more. The other points are valid - that the reality would probably spoil the fantasy, and there may be 'performance deficiencies.'

So having said that, if we're purely in the realm of fantasy, then as part of the fantasy I'd have to be really well off. Like Oprah-rich. I think any other way I wouldn't be able to justify the high prices that these A-list models would charge.

Having said that, following some of the other comments on purchasing services, I have no experience doing this in Europe, but I can report that my experiences in Toronto have been mostly good, with some being excellent. The prices are reasonable, and I've always found truth in the advertising. My last trip there I "contracted" with a young lady (24y.o.) who was at a condo nearby. I was more comfortable going to visit her. When I stepped inside all I could think was that her picture didn't do her justice. She was just the body type I like: petite, small breasts, nice bum. Yes, for those of you near Toronto, I can't recommend it high enough.

But if I do ever find myself being Oprah-rich, I may check in here to see if any of you know how to contact Sasha Grey or Aubrey Addams.

03-08-10  04:48pm - 5403 days #8
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Thanks for all the advice. Based on this information I think I'll just sign up for the 20Mb service for now. I'm supposedly capable of around 7Mb now so it will be a substantial improvement without a big cost increase. I'll be interested to see how much of an actual improvement it will be. If it's really good I may need to increase my porn budget...

03-07-10  06:21pm - 5404 days #7
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by biker:


rame.net would be a good place to start looking. I really do not think you will find it available. Porn films drop from sight very fast. The producers are more concerned with creating new films then perserving the old ones. Good luck.


You're certainly right in a lot of cases, but I've been able to source a lot of my favorite older titles on VOD sites. It can be expensive though. If the film is available on any of the common VOD sites RAME will provide that information and a link.

03-07-10  06:18pm - 5404 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I’ll have the opportunity to upgrade to a fiber-optic internet connection (right to the house, not just to a node) within a month. I’m not too tech savvy but I suspect that download speeds are based on what the servers at the other end are able to provide. Do any of you at PU have any experience with fiber-optic internet and how do you find most porn sites for speed when they may be the slower link? The available speed options are for 20, 35 and 60 Mbit services. Would going with 35 or 60 just be a waste of money if most websites can’t support it?

03-05-10  04:28pm - 5406 days #8
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Sorry, I can't help you. But I'll offer this advice - if you don't like Bukkake facials, then steer clear of Gokkun.

03-05-10  04:26pm - 5406 days #6
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


I can be unequivocal in this: the moment she acquires "ENHANCED" breasts she becomes an ex-favorite! :-)

Talking about favorite models, anyone else like Faye Reagan/Valentine? I love freckles.


I agree with both sentiments. Enhancements tend to make me lose interest pretty quickly. I was watching some of Teagan Presley's older stuff yesterday and seeing her so fresh, innocent and natural made me cringe to see what she's become.

As for freckles, I'm with you on this one 100%. Faye is a big favorite of mine. Allison Whyte is another freckly favorite. Frekled models are too rare.

02-28-10  02:12pm - 5411 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by kkman112:


You can also look through the list of Individual Models here on PU. There are actually many models similar to them out there. I notice more appearing yearly.


Thanks. I'll check that out. I never thought of that...

02-28-10  02:11pm - 5411 days #25
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


The stuff that I really liked from Max was from the early 90's. He had quite a few series where he actually went down on the girls. The anal was the main theme but that doesn't mean that it was the only thing. Most if noot all of it can no longer be bought. I'm not sure why because it was rather tame by todays standard. I agree that he became quite a dick(no pun intended). I don't remember that scene but then again I probably would have turned it off or fast forwarded. The hat has always been is trade mark so no way of knowing which scene it was from.


I agree that early Max was pretty good. I think I first discovered a Max movie in about 1994. My suspicion is that it was one of the Casting Call series. I remember that Max pushed the limits even then, but the older stuff seems very tame in comparison with his later stuff. The vomiting and urinating aren’t really my cup of pee. I mean tea…

Some older Max stuff is available online. I’ve bought and viewed / downloaded a a number of the older titles. The problem (if you see it as a problem) is that it is mostly VOD, which can get pretty pricey when you want to download to own. For me it wasn’t an issue since I wanted to capture the glory days of my porn youth and see these old titles again. The one series that seems to be mostly unavailable is the Casting Call series. There are a few of the older titles in this series, but not many.

Anal was still the main theme for most of Max’s work, but it wasn’t always rough or degrading. It seemed to be anal sex for the sake of anal sex. Later Max seemed to use rough anal sex as just another means of degrading the women he worked with.

I wonder what Max will do when he gets out of jail…

02-27-10  06:37pm - 5412 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
The schoolgirl uniform is a constant favorite of mine. I don't feel creeped out about how it makes me feel at all. Mostly I just wonder why Catholic priests went after the boys...

02-27-10  08:21am - 5413 days #9
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


It's possible that many new girls choose to wait as long as possible to get more popular and therefore make more money for that first and often last anal scene. Sunny Lane and Gianna being at the top of my list.


I agree with your entire point that anal does seem to be on a downward trend. There seem to be a lot of new stars who have yet to do anal. But I'll be there when they do!

Like you (I think) I also like to track down the few anal scenes of stars who only did a couple. I remember hunting for Ass Cleavage 2 just to see April Flowers' first anal scene. Likewise for one of my favorite vag-only girls, Felix Vicious. She's only done two anal scenes and it took me some time to find those. Eva Angelina is another anal rarity, though it seems she's doing a lot more of them now.

02-27-10  08:14am - 5413 days #8
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


I think the shaved or not shaved issue comes before the anal question. But I definitely agree that it's not a fad - it's a niche. And I think it's popularity is due to the taboo nature of the act.


Interesting point. I've never perceived or recognized the pubic hair issue as being polarizing. That's not to say that it isn't, but I've just failed to see the debate. For guys who like pubic hair, it must be difficult. Finding unshaved models in porn must mean going to a niche site since mainstream porn has been hairless for a long time now.

1351-1400 of 1453 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 8 14 20 27 Page 28 29 30 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.