|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
lk2fireone (0)
|
| 101-150 of 3618 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | Page 3 | 4 | 15 | 26 | 37 | 48 | 59 | 72 | 73 | Next Page > |
| 03-19-19 10:22am - 2105 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Someone, back in the day, put a lot of thought and effort in writing the software that controls how the PU site handles your email, allowing you to choose which options you want PU to follow. I used to get confirming emails for every review, and for every reply to one of my reviews. If you hit the "Edit Profile" hot link located directly under your user name (near the top of each PU page) it opens "Account Info" page, which has a heading: "Preferences". Under preferences is a list of checkboxes on how you want PU to handle your account: E-mail Prefs: Allow users to contact me through my profile (e-mail will be forwarded to you). E-mail me important Porn Users site announcements . Notify me when someone replies to my reviews and comments. Notify me when someone replies to a reply I've made. Notify me when any submission I've made has been denied. Notify me when my review or comment is officially approved. Note: You'll always receive critical e-mails related to your account. Trust ratings: Automatically pop-up the *Comment Box when submitting trust vote. Pre-select "Submit Anonymously" when submitting new trust votes. Notify me by e-mail when someone rates me with a comment. Notify me by e-mail when someone sends me a trust comment reply. *Comment Box will always show for "No" trust votes. | |
|
||
| 03-18-19 05:57pm - 2106 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Freddie, is PU still sending out an automatic email when a review is accepted? I haven't gotten a confirming email on the last few reviews I wrote, I think. (Unless I deleted them automatically, which I doubt.) | |
|
||
| 03-18-19 02:29pm - 2106 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Wow! Darling Freddie, if you could use the unimpressed GIF with Jennifer Lawrence from that URL, that would be very impressive. And you could start your own fan club here at PU. Wishing you the best, Freddie.  https://giphy.com/gifs/jennifer-lawrence-unimpressed-basWa12RQKIO4 | |
|
||
| 03-18-19 09:18am - 2106 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Darling Freddie (if I may be so bold), I admire the way you made the fraudster illegible for the raffle. Must be a Spanish- or English-from-England way of treating trolls. Americans are more direct: he would have been banned for 2 fraudulent reviews. LOL.  | |
|
||
| 03-18-19 08:56am - 2106 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Sometimes the PU staff seems to be asleep at the wheel. It can happen to a lot of people, I guess neverbe7426371 submitted a review of Cum 4K on 03-15-19. mbaya on 03-16-19 replied to this review: "Cut and paste from the review on TBP. Shame on you. I even gave a trust vote!" Did a PU staff member read and understand what mbaya wrote? Apparently not. Because the review was accepted, and even earned tickets for the upcoming raffle. The review was fraudulent. Basically it was cut and pasted from The Best Porn review on Cum 4K posted Oct 7, '18. If a PU staff member, especially the one who is in charge of accepting the reviews submitted by members, wants to compare the neverbe review to the TBP review: he or she will find that the neverbe review was copied almost word-for-word from the TBP review. Possibly the PU staff are not checking the reviews very closely. Fine. But when a PU member posts a reply that a review is fraudulent, shouldn't the PU staff react to the charge? Or ignore it, since mbaya is not worth the time or energy to understand what he posts? mbaya is ranked 4th on the list of PU users. He has submitted 248 site reviews. He has posted 148 site comments. He has posted 1033 replies to the PU site. (If these figures are accurate: but I am beginning to wonder if the PU site is keeping up with the times, and maybe the software engineer is doing a poor job. The software engineer can't even allow FreddieAdmin to post an avatar of herself. So, mbaya is not some newbie or shill who's pushing a pet product: He tells the PU site that a member submitted a fraudulent review, that was copied from the TBP site review. And no one at the PU staff bothers to read or understand what mbaya says? The PU staff needs to wake up and take charge of the PU site. Or else it will go downhill in quality and participation by members. The PU site is a product. How committed are the PU staff to making the PU site a continuing success? Not very, judging by the two small items: 1. A major PU member points out that a review was a fraud, copied from the TPB site. And no PU staff member checks this out. Instead, the fraudulent review is given 2 points to the raffle. 2. Freddie says she will post an avatar of herself. She hints that she looks like Jennifer Lawrence. But days and weeks go by, and there is no avatar posted. If PU has a software engineer overseeing the site, maybe the PU owner needs to hire a competent software engineer to keep the site running smoothly. End of rant. PS: I admire Jennifer Lawrence as an actress. I also admire Freddie for her sweet posts. But I'm still waiting for her avatar, so I can see if she really does resemble Jennifer Lawrence. | |
|
||
| 03-17-19 06:47pm - 2107 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Bring an umbrella. London is famous for the rain and fog. Maybe a trip to California might be better? Or New York, if you want to visit an ant hill? | |
|
||
| 03-17-19 06:42pm - 2107 days | #1419 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Although John McCain died last year, President Trump will never forget, never forgive McCain for treason against the Republican party. McCain was a stained man. Trust Trump on this: But McCain's family stay loyal to the man. In spite of Trump's personal attacks. ------ ------ Trump slams John McCain over vote, Meghan McCain fires back Geobeats Mar 17th 2019 9:36AM Senator John McCain died in August of last year, and months later, President Trump is still attacking him. On Saturday, Trump took to Twitter and slammed McCain over the Russia dossier and Obamacare repeal vote. “Spreading the fake and totally discredited Dossier ‘is unfortunately a very dark stain against John McCain.’ Ken Starr, Former Independent Counsel,” Trump tweeted. “He had far worse ‘stains’ than this, including thumbs down on repeal and replace after years of campaigning to repeal and replace!” The late senator’s daughter, Meghan McCain, promptly fired back at the president. “No one will ever love you the way they loved my father…. I wish I had been given more Saturday’s with him,” she tweeted. “Maybe spend yours with your family instead of on twitter obsessing over mine?” After John McCain gave a deciding “no” vote on the GOP’s effort to overhaul Obamacare in 2017, Trump repeatedly criticized him, even while he was battling brain cancer. Cindy McCain, John McCain’s wife, told the BBC late last year that Trump’s attacks on her husband are something she may never get over. | |
|
||
| 03-15-19 12:46pm - 2109 days | #8 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I once ran across a site that featured eating or licking the boogers (dried snot) from another person's nose. Not my cup of tea. To each his/her own, but some fetishes I can do without.  | |
|
||
| 03-15-19 08:47am - 2109 days | #11 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Where is the PU HQ located? If it's local to my area, I'd love to drop by to meet and greet the PU staff, to see who's running the show. And I'd like to see Freddie, so I can find out how much she resembles Jennifer Lawrence. PS: I'm still waiting for Freddie's avatar. Maybe you need to hire a software guy who can fix the site problems. PS: Freddie has 0 posts according to the PU computer. But I've seen many posts from Freddie. Were they all fake posts, that didn't count? Enquiring minds want to know! Edited on Mar 15, 2019, 08:50am | |
|
||
| 03-15-19 03:25am - 2109 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Watching gay porn would be out of my comfort zone. I haven't done it yet. I'm afraid that at my age, I might find it erotic. I remember watching some trans videos a while back. The trans models were attractive. I found myself confused. Is a trans male or female or something different? But there are some attractive trans models out there. | |
|
||
| 03-14-19 12:09am - 2111 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Even if PU decides to add a thumbs up button for reviews, I think that if an outstanding review is written by a PU member, that it's a more meaningful way to acknowledge the contribution by giving that person a first place finish in the weekly raffle. And the PU staff could also add one or more stars or staff thumbs-up approval icons to the review, if they choose. Whatever. But the prize should be restricted to outstanding, impressive reviews only. And should only be given once in a while. Unless the level of reviews submitted somehow improves a lot. Which is doubtful, in my opinion. Some people have the ability, the talent to make some great reviews. But most of us submit what we hope are adequate reviews. And the standard bar that the PU staff uses for reviews is pretty low. I talking about reviews that win one or more raffle tickets. Khan was much more discriminating. May he rest in peace. | |
|
||
| 03-13-19 12:33pm - 2111 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Sometimes a PU member submits a truly outstanding site review. Instead of giving that member's review one or two raffle tickets, I think a better way of recognizing his/her contribution would be to give him/her first prize in the raffle, and let the other two places be filled from the random drawing. I'm not saying that truly outstanding reviews are posted often: I was thinking that the first two reviews by Shen were that good, and that the last review by pinkerton was also outstanding. I'm not saying this should happen for every raffle. Only when a truly outstanding review is posted should it be eligible for the first place prize, as a recognition of the thought and work that went into writing it. Any comments from the PU members and PU staff would be appreciated. | |
|
||
| 03-08-19 07:51pm - 2116 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
GIRLSWAY IS INCLUDED IN THE ADULT TIME NETWORK. ADULT TIME HAS OVER 140 CHANNELS (SITES). IF YOU CAN FIND A DISCOUNTED PRICE FOR ADULT TIME, THAT WOULD BE THE WAY TO GO TO GET ACCESS TO GIRLSWAY. I'VE SEEN ADS FOR ADULT TIME AS LOW AS $9.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH, OR $63 FOR A YEARLY MEMBERSHIP. THAT INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK. UNLIMITED STREAMING, UNLIMITED DOWNLOADING. | |
|
||
| 03-08-19 07:44am - 2116 days | #1417 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
FOX NEWS IS NOT AN IMPARTIAL NEWS SOURCE. FOX NEWS SLANTS MANY OF ITS PROGRAMS IN FAVOR OF DONALD TRUMP. I SEEM TO REMEMBER READING THAT FOX NEWS ITSELF SAID IT WAS NOT A NEWS ORGANIZATION. (I DON'T RECALL THE EXACT WORDS, BUT FOX NEWS SAID THEY WERE GIVING OPINIONS, NOT NEWS. NEWS IS SUPPOSED TO BE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL: FOX NEWS HEAVILY SUPPORTS DONALD TRUMP, WHICH IS ONE REASON TRUMP WATCHES IT.) DONALD TRUMP IS A SERIAL LIAR AND HE DISTORTS THE FACTS. HE SAID PRESIDENT OBAMA WAS A POOR STUDENT WHO DID NOT DESERVE TO ATTEND HARVARD. IT'S TRUE THAT OBAMA DID NOT PUBLICLY RELEASE HIS COLLEGE GRADES. ON OTHER HAND, PRESIDENT TRUMP'S FRIENDS, BEFORE HE BECAME PRESIDENT, PRESSURED THE ADMINSTRATORS OF TRUMP'S HIGH SCHOOL TO HIDE HIS GRADES. THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE SCHOOL SAID THEY HAD NEVER HIDDEN ANYONE'S SCHOOL RECORD, EXCEPT FOR TRUMP. THE REASON THEY GAVE IN TO PRESSURE WAS THE THREAT THE SCHOOL COULD LOSE A LOT OF MONEY FROM WEALTHY DONORS AND ALUMNI. TRUMP ACCUSED OBAMA OF BEING A POOR STUDENT, WHO DID NOT DESERVE TO GET INTO HARVARD. A FEW DAYS LATER, TRUMP'S WEALTHY SUPPORTERS LOBBIED TRUMP'S HIGH SCHOOL TO HIDE HIS HIGH SCHOOL RECORDS. WHICH WAS A FIRST FOR THE SCHOOL: HIDING A FORMER STUDENT'S RECORD. THE NEWS ABOUT THE HIGH SCHOOL HIDING TRUMP'S HIGH SCHOOL RECORD WAS PUBLISHED IN THE NEWS THIS WEEK, BY DIFFERENT NEWS SOURCES. TRUMP, OF COURSE, BRAGGED THAT HE "WAS ONE OF THE TOP GUYS AT THE SCHOOL." TRUTH, OR ANOTHER OF TRUMP'S LIES? IF TRUMP WAS ONE OF THE TOP GUYS AT HIS HIGH SCHOOL, WHY WERE HIS HIGH SCHOOL RECORDS MOVED AND SEALED? THE HIDDEN SCHOOL RECORD FOR TRUMP WAS A UNIQUE EVENT: NEVER DONE BEFORE AT THE SCHOOL. TRUMP IS WILLING TO ATTACK ANYONE, MALE, FEMALE, AND THE ATTACKS ARE OFTEN NOT BASED ON FACTS, BUT ON LIES AND FICTION: OBAMA WAS BORN IN AFRICA, SO OBAMA WAS NOT A LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT, ACCORDING TO TRUMP. EXCEPT OBAMA WAS BORN IN HAWAII, WHICH MOST PEOPLE BELIEVE IS PART OF THE UNITED STATES, SO FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE, OBAMA WAS A LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT. THERE'S NOTHING STOPPING FOX NEWS FROM DOING STORIES ABOUT THE DEBATES, AND GIVING OPINION PIECES. BUT A DEBATE IS BASED ON RULES: SUPPOSEDLY FAIR TO BOTH SIDES. IN POLITICS, OR IN BUSINESS, DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO LET FOX NEWS HOLD A DEBATE, WHEN YOU ALREADY KNOW FOX NEWS IS HEAVILY BIASED IN TRUMP'S FAVOR? DO YOU WANT TO LET A CROOKED UMPIRE RULE A BASEBALL GAME? YOU THINK FOX WOULDN'T FAVOR TRUMP OVER HIS OPPONENTS? IF THE NEWS ORGANIZATIONS FAVORED DEMOCRATS OVER REPUBLICAN, THEN YOU COULD HAVE FOX NEWS HOLDING ONE DEBATE, AND A NEWS ORGANIZATION HOLDING A DIFFERENT DEBATE. MAYBE THE BIASES WOULD CANCEL EACH OTHER OUT. EXCEPT THAT FOX NEWS CONSIDER TRUMP'S LIES AS GOSPEL MOST NEWS ORGANIZATIONS (THE FAKE NEWS THAT TRUMP WANTS TO DESTROY), ONLY PRINT STORIES BASED ON THE FACTS OR EVIDENCE AVAILABLE TO THEM. SO FOX NEWS WOULD COME OUT AHEAD, TRUMP WOULD COME OUT AHEAD, IN A DEBATE, BECAUSE FOX NEWS IS BASICALLY THE PUBLIC MOUTHPIECE FOR TRUMP: FOX NEWS IS NOT NEWS, IT'S POLITICAL OPINIONS IN SUPPORT OF TRUMP. | |
|
||
| 03-07-19 02:00am - 2117 days | #1415 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Democrats bar Fox News from moderating debates after reported Trump ties Thomson Reuters Jim Oliphant, Sheila Dang, and Lisa Lambert Mar 6th 2019 9:30PM WASHINGTON, March 6 (Reuters) - The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday said it will not allow Fox News to host any of its candidates' political debates through 2020, citing a report this week about the conservative channel's ties to U.S. President Donald Trump. "Recent reporting in the New Yorker on the inappropriate relationship between President Trump, his administration and Fox News has led me to conclude that the network is not in a position to host a fair and neutral debate for our candidates," DNC Chairman Tom Perez said in a statement provided to Reuters. "Therefore, Fox News will not serve as a media partner for the 2020 Democratic primary debates," Perez said in a statement. Representatives for Fox said they hoped the DNC would reconsider and let some of its journalists moderate a Democratic presidential debate. Trump responded to the announcement by saying he may refuse to participate in certain debates. "I think I’ll do the same thing with the Fake News Networks and the Radical Left Democrats in the General Election debates!" he said in a Twitter post. Trump has criticized CNN and MSNBC, among other media, as "Fake News" for their coverage of his administration. The DNC's decision is a rerun of the 2016 primary election, when it turned down Fox's multiple offers to host a debate, citing the network's longstanding conservative bent and prominent criticism of Democratic policies. At that time a Democrat, Barack Obama, occupied the Oval Office. Trump, a Republican seeking re-election in 2020, has stoked polarization between the two U.S. political parties by appealing to his base on Twitter and television and policy speeches while simultaneously publicly attacking and feuding with prominent Democrats. The New Yorker earlier this week reported on "seamlessly" close ties between Trump and the television network founded by Rupert Murdoch, citing an expert on presidential studies who said Fox is the "closest we've come to having state t.v." The article went on to describe the access and interviews that members of the White House have granted exclusively to the network. breaking-news logo As the field of competition to become Democrats' next presidential nominee grows ever more crowded, the party has decided to split its first primary debate over two weeknights this summer. Twelve people have already jumped into the race and the DNC has capped each debate night at 20 candidates. The party's primary debates this year will mark a sharp reversal from its last round of contests, when less than half a dozen politicians appeared at a handful of debates that were televised on Saturday nights and other times with notoriously low television viewership. (Reporting by Jim Oliphant, Sheila Dang, and Lisa Lambert; writing by Susan Heavey and Lisa Lambert) | |
|
||
| 03-03-19 03:05pm - 2121 days | #1413 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I DOUBT THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE. HE HAS THE US SENATE AND THE SUPREME COURT ON HIS SIDE. BUT IF HE DID RESIGN, I BELIEVE MIKE PENCE WOULD TAKE OVER. UNLESS THERE WAS HARD EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY BY PENCE, WHICH I DOUBT EXISTS, HE IS FIRST IN LINE TO REPLACE TRUMP. BRETT KAVANAUGH WAS NOMINATED AND PLACED ON THE US SUPREME COURT. THERE WERE NUMEROUS WITNESSES THAT PUBLICLY STATED KAVANAUGH LIED UNDER OATH WHILE TESTIFYING TO THE SENATE CONFIRMATION HEARINGS. THE FBI DID NOT INTERVIEW ANY OF THEM, EVEN WHEN THEY SENT LETTERS TO THE FBI STATING THEY HAD KNOWLEDGE OF KAVANAUGH GIVING FALSE TESTIMONY. THE FBI INVESTIGATION WAS A COVER-UP. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. THE FBI DID NOT INTERVIEW MANY WITNESSES WHO SAID KAVANAUGH WAS LYING. WHY? THEY WERE DIRECTED BY, EITHER PRESIDENT TRUMP, OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, IN THE SCOPE OF THEIR INVESTIGATION. | |
|
||
| 03-03-19 10:02am - 2121 days | #1411 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
EXCUSE THE CAPS. EASIER FOR ME TO SEE AND EDIT. LOCK HIM (TRUMP) UP. LOCK HIM (TRUMP) UP. FOR LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. FOR CORRUPTION IN OFFICE. THE ONLY PROBLEM IS THAT IF TRUMP IS REMOVED FROM OFFICE, WE'LL GET MIKE PENCE. WHO IS, PARDON THE FRENCH, A PIECE OF MERDE. (MERDE IS FRENCH FOR SHIT.) March 3, 2019 11:43AM ET House Judiciary Chairman Says the President Obstructed Justice “You have to persuade the American public” before going ahead with impeachment, Rep. Jerrold Nadler said By Peter Wade On Sunday morning, House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) did not mince words when asked by ABC’s This Week host, George Stephanopoulos, whether President Donald Trump obstructed justice. “It’s very clear that the president obstructed justice. It’s very clear,” Nadler answered. BREAKING: @GStephanopoulos: "Do you think the president obstructed justice?" House judiciary chairman Jerry Nadler: "Yes, I do. It's very clear that the president obstructed justice" https://t.co/YaWpzth66u pic.twitter.com/m7TiPwAKyo — ABC News (@ABC) March 3, 2019 Nadler went on to explain, “Eleven-hundred times [Trump] referred to the Mueller investigation as a witch hunt. He tried to protect [former national security advisor] Michael Flynn from being investigated by the FBI. He fired [former FBI Director] James Comey in order to stop the ‘Russia thing’ as he told NBC News. He’s intimidated witnesses in public.” Stephanopoulos then asked the chairman if all of that is true, then why not pursue impeachment. Nadler said the committee would need to organize and “sort out” the evidence before taking further steps. Nadler also explained that securing public support is necessary. “Before you impeach somebody, you have to persuade the American public that it ought to happen, Nadler said. He also made the point that impeachment needs bipartisan support, adding, “You have to persuade enough of the opposition party voters, Trump voters… that you’re not just trying to reverse the results of the last election.” That last point by Nadler seemingly feels impossible. At this point, no matter how much evidence is accumulated, does anyone really believe that Trump voters will ever see this president clearly enough to support impeachment? | |
|
||
| 03-03-19 09:48am - 2121 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF REALLY CUTE OR ATTRACTIVE GIRLS DOING CHAT. THERE WAS A THREAD RECENTLY AT PU TALKING ABOUT GIRLS DOING CHAT. MY IMPRESSION WAS THAT SOME GIRLS CAN MAKE MORE MONEY FROM CHAT THAN FROM DOING PORN PHOTOSETS OR VIDEOS. IF THE CAN MAKE AS MUCH OR MORE THAN PHOTOS OR VIDEOS, THE ADVANTAGES SEEM CLEAR: -LESS CHANCE OF SEXUAL DISEASE TRANSMISSION -MORE CONVENIENT: -SET YOUR OWN HOURS: -LESS TRAVEL EXPENSE: DO IT IN YOUR HOME. -AND DON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH OTHER INCONVENIENCES. -HOW MUCH MONEY THE GIRL MAKES FROM REGULAR PORN IS NOT A LOT: IF THE GIRL IS POPULAR, SHE CAN PROBABLY DO FAR BETTER IN CHAT. OF COURSE, SOME GIRLS DO CHAT AND REGULAR PORN, AS WELL. BUT MY IMPRESSION IS THAT MOST GIRLS IN REGULAR PORN DON'T MAKE MUCH MONEY. NO REAL FIGURES TO BACK THIS UP, BUT I THINK THE GIRLS GET PEANUTS, FOR THEIR WORK: BOTH PHOTO AND VIDEO. SO CHAT COULD, IF THE GIRL IS POPULAR, MAKE A LOT MORE MONEY THAN REGULAR PORN. | |
|
||
| 02-27-19 09:47pm - 2125 days | #1409 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
IVANKA TRUMP ENDORSES WORKING YOUR WAY UP THROUGH LIFE. JUST THE WAY IVANKA DID. SHE STARTED WITH NOTHING. AND BECAUSE SHE IS SO SMART, SHE BECAME A MILLIONAIRE. DID IT HELP THAT DONALD TRUMP, HER FATHER, GAVE HER A FEW MILLION OR MORE TO START WITH? IVANKA SAYS AMERICANS DON'T WANT THINGS GIVEN TO THEM. AMERICANS, IN THEIR HEARTS, ONLY WANT TO EARN THEIR OWN WAY. JUST LIKE IVANKA DID. IVANKA MADE OVER $12 MILLION LAST YEAR, INCLUDING $2 MILLION FROM THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION WHEN SHE LEFT THAT ORGANIZATION. BUT SHE EARNED EVERY PENNY OF THAT MONEY. SHE IS HER FATHER'S DAUGHTER. HE EARNED EVERY PENNY HE EVER HAD. AND SHE EARNED EVERY PENNY SHE EVER HAD. CAN YOU SMELL THE BULLSHIT? IT'S COMING OUT OF HER EARS, HER EYES, HER MOUTH, AND EVERY OTHER PORE IN HER BODY. | |
|
||
| 02-26-19 08:35am - 2126 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
HOPING EVERYTHING IS GOING WELL FOR YOU. AND WISHING YOU THE BEST. IF YOU HAVE THE TIME, TRY TO STOP BY THE SITE, TO KEEP US UP TO DATE ON YOUR CURRENT PORN INTERESTS. EXCEPT IF YOU ARE MOVING TO A COUNTRY WHERE PORN IS FROWNED UPON, MAYBE YOU WILL NEED TO ELIMINATE ANY AND ALL PORN. IN SOME COUNTRIES PORN CAN BE DANGEROUS TO YOUR SAFETY. SO I'D CHECK OUT WHAT THE LAWS ARE WHERE YOU'RE MOVING TO. WISHING YOU THE BEST OF HEALTH AND LUCK IN YOUR NEW LOCATION. | |
|
||
| 02-26-19 08:01am - 2126 days | #1408 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
THE HOUSE OF TRUMP IS STARTING TO CRUMBLE. MICHAEL COHEN, PRESIDENT'S TRUMP FORMER LAWYER AND FIXER, IS WILLING TO TALK ABOUT TRUMP'S CRIMINAL ACTS. Michael Cohen will give Congress evidence of Trump criminal conduct since becoming president NBC News Allan Smith and Adam Reiss Feb 26th 2019 8:01AM During his much-anticipated public testimony before Congress, President Donald Trump's former longtime attorney Michael Cohen will provide evidence of his old boss' criminal conduct since becoming president, a knowledgeable source about what to expect told NBC News. And, as this source laid out, there is much more congressional investigators and viewers can expect Cohen to provide. Trump's ex-attorney will detail what he will describe as the president's lies, racism and cheating as a private businessman while Cohen spent a decade working for him, the source said. Cohen will also reveal information about Trump's financial statements and may actually provide the statements, the source said. This information would require the president's long-held secret tax returns in order to verify, providing an avenue for House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to request those returns. As the source said, Trump deflated the value of his properties in some cases so to reduce his property tax. The source said Cohen will address his motives for lying on behalf of Trump and why he lied to Congress about the Trump Tower Moscow negotiations — a charge he pleaded guilty to late last year. Cohen will additionally discuss if anyone told him to lie. In addition to his public session on Wednesday, Cohen will testify behind closed doors to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday and the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday. The House Oversight Committee earlier provided the framework for what they want Cohen to address during his open testimony. In December, Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison for what a Manhattan federal court judge called a "veritable smorgasbord" of criminal conduct, including facilitating secret payments to women who claimed they had affairs with Trump, lying to Congress about the president's business dealings with Russia and failing to report millions of dollars in income. | |
|
||
| 02-26-19 07:49am - 2126 days | #14 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
FREDDIE, I'M STILL WAITING FOR YOUR AVATAR. IT BETTER BE GOOD, AFTER MAKING US WAIT SO LONG.  | |
|
||
| 02-26-19 07:44am - 2126 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
ON THE OTHER HAND, WHAT ABOUT PETER O'TOOLE, NOMINATED FOR 8 OSCARS, NEVER WINNING ONCE. AND STEPHEN SPEILBERG WAS NOMINATED 19 TIMES FOR OSCARS. HE WON 2 OSCARS FOR BEST DIRECTOR, AFTER A LOT OF LOSSES. SOME GUYS SEEM TO WAIT FOREVER, BEFORE FINALLY WINNING AN OSCAR. OTHER GUYS DIE BEFORE THEY EITHER WIN OR NEVER WIN. MAYBE THE OSCARS ARE A POPULARITY CONTEST, OR A POLITICAL CONTEST. OR A MARKETING CONTEST. A LOT OF DIFFERENT FACTORS AT PLAY. PAUL NEWMAN FINALLY WON AN OSCAR BEFORE HE DIED, BUT IT WAS VERY LATE IN HIS CAREER. I'VE ENJOYED MANY OF HIS MOVIES, ESPECIALLY WHEN HE WAS A BIG POPULAR STAR, BUT HE WON FOR ROAD TO PERDITION, WHICH SEEMED MORE LIKE A RECOGNITION OF HIS PREVIOUS WORK THAN AN OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE IN THAT MOVIE. | |
|
||
| 02-25-19 08:15am - 2127 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
PARDON THE CAPS. EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND EDIT. LIKE LOKI, I USED TO FOLLOW THE ACADEMY AWARDS. YOU SEE THE BIGGEST STARS IN THE MOVIE INDUSTRY, AND THEY PUT ON A SHOW WITH SOMETIMES HUMOROUS HOSTS. BUT I'VE COME TO REALIZE I DON'T MUCH CARE WHAT MOVIES WIN THE OSCARS, BECAUSE THE WINNERS DON'T CORRELATE WITH HOW MUCH ENJOYMENT I WILL GET FROM THOSE FILMS. OF COURSE, BOX OFFICE RESULTS ALSO DON'T CORRELATE WITH MY ENJOYMENT OF A LOT OF MOVIES. I CAN WATCH SOME OSCAR WINNERS AND GET BORED OUT OF MY SKULL. NOWADAYS, I DON'T EVEN BOTHER TO WATCH THE OSCARS ANY MORE. EVEN THOUGH I CAN REALLY ENJOY SOME MOVIES. THE MOVIES I ENJOY RARELY WIN OSCARS. | |
|
||
| 02-23-19 04:12pm - 2129 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
EXCUSE THE CAPS. EASIER FOR ME READ AND SEE. SUICIDE IS REAL. IT HAPPENS. AND TO BE A PORN PERFORMER, YOU NEED A BULLET-PROOF SKIN. HOW MUCH DID CYBER-BULLYING ACT IN HER DEATH? WHAT OTHER ISSUES WERE THERE, AS THE CAUSE OF DEATH? HARD TO SAY. SHE WAS A YOUNG WOMAN. ATTRACTIVE. A STAR IN PORN. BUT WHO THE FUCK KNOWS WHAT PRESSURES SHE WAS UNDER? WHAT OTHER ISSUES WERE BOTHERING HER? I DON'T THINK PRESCRIPTION MEDS ARE THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING, BUT MAYBE SHE COULD HAVE REACHED OUT TO HER PERSONAL DOCTOR FOR HELP, OR FOR COUNSELING. ON A PERSONAL LEVEL, IT CAN AFFECT ME KNOWING A PORN STAR COMMITTED SUICIDE. I CAN'T IGNORE IT. SO I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO WATCH HER VIDEOS OR PHOTO SETS WITHOUT THINKING ABOUT WHAT A WASTE IT WAS TO DIE THAT WAY. WISHING THAT SHE HAS FOUND PEACE. | |
|
||
| 02-22-19 12:17pm - 2130 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
FREDDIE, WHEN DO WE GET TO SEE YOUR AVATAR, SO WE GET TO SEE WHICH OSCAR NOMINATED ACTRESS YOU LOOK LIKE? OR IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN OSCAR-NOMINATED LOOKALIKE, MAYBE YOU STILL HAVE A FAVORITE ACTRESS WHO YOU ADMIRE, THAT LOOKS A BIT LIKE YOU?  | |
|
||
| 02-22-19 12:54am - 2130 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Girls Under Arrest REALISTIC DEPICTION OF HOW COPS IN THE REAL WORLD GET THEIR KICKS BANGING HOT SUSPECTS. THE ONLY BETTER THING THAN BANGING HOT SUSPECTS WOULD BE BLOWING THEM AWAY. BUT THAT MIGHT BLUR THE LINES BETWEEN LIVE AND DEAD MEAT. STILL A TINY SITE, BUT HAS A PROMISING START, IN SHOWING HOW A COP'S BADGE GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO FUCK OVER ANYONE IN HIS WAY. (THERE MIGHT BE WOMEN COPS, BUT THEY ARE PUSSIES.) IT'S A MAN'S WORLD, AND COPS ARE IN THE FOREFRONT OF THAT.  WE NEED TO GET THIS SITE LISTED IMMEDIATELY, SO PU MEMBERS CAN WATCH THE VIDEOS AND DECIDE IF THEY WANT A CAREER AS A POLICE OFFICER. | |
|
||
| 02-22-19 12:20am - 2131 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I DISAGREE. THIS POWERFUL CREATURE IS AMAZING. WHERE HE STEPS, THE FEMALES TREMBLE IN FEAR AND AWE. HE IS MORE THAN KING OF THE ROOST. HE IS DESCENDED FROM THE OLD GODS ABOVE. WHEN HE IS NEAR, THE FEMALES DROP TO THEIR BACKSIDES (OR WHATEVER THE PROPER POSITION IS FOR THEM) AND OFFER THEIR MOST PRIVATES TO THIS GOD-LIKE COCK. TO HEAR HIM ROAR, AND THE FEMALES SHRIEK, IS TO KNOW THAT GOD HAS MADE THE MALE TO CONQUER AND THE FEMALE TO SUBMIT IN JOY AND FEAR. | |
|
||
| 02-21-19 09:12am - 2131 days | #24 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
PS: CONGRATS ON PASSING YOUR FIRST ANNIVERSARY DATE AT PU, MBAYA. | |
|
||
| 02-21-19 09:09am - 2131 days | #23 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
PARDON THE CAPS. THEY ARE EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND EDIT. THE BEST GUIDE TO WRITING AN EXCELLENT REVIEW IS THE THREAD: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ead.html?threadid=57 VERY FEW REVIEWS FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES OF TOADSITH'S CHEAT SHEET. WE DON'T HAVE THE TIME, EFFORT, OR TALENT TO WRITE THE EXCELLENT REVIEWS HE WROTE. HOWEVER, IT HELPS TO READ THAT THREAD, TO GET AN IDEA OF THE CRITERIA THAT AN EXCELLENT REVIEW INCLUDES. EXCEPT THAT QUITE OFTEN, WE WRITE REVIEWS THAT TRY TO GIVE THE FLAVOR OF A SITE. TOO MANY FACTS, TOO MANY STATISTICS, WHILE IMPORTANT TO SOME PEOPLE, CAN MAKE FOR A BORING REVIEW. INFORMATIVE, MAYBE, BUT BORING. EXCEPT TOADSITH'S REVIEWS WERE NOT BORING: THEY WERE A MODEL OF CLARITY, WHILE STILL BEING INFORMATIVE. BUT IF I HAD TO JUDGE OR COMPARE MY REVIEWS TO TOADSITH'S, I WOULD NEVER SUBMIT A SINGLE REVIEW. SHEN IS ANOTHER GUY WHO HAS ONLY WRITTEN TWO REVIEWS. BOTH REVIEWS WERE AMAZING. I FOOLISHLY GAVE HIM A POSITIVE TRUST RATING. WHEN I SHOULD HAVE GIVEN HIM A TRIPLE NON-TRUST RATING, BECAUSE HIS REVIEWS WERE OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN WITH THE HELP OF BRAINIAC, THE DEADLIEST ARCH-ENEMY OF POOR PU REVIEWERS EVERYWHERE. | |
|
||
| 02-18-19 01:22pm - 2134 days | #14 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I USE FIREFOX. THE "YES" TRUST VOTE IS NOT AN ACTIVE HOT LINK. MAYBE THAT'S A HINT FROM THE PU STAFF THAT WE SHOULD BE SUSPICIOUS OF GIVING OUR TRUST TO OTHER PU MEMBERS? I WAS GOING TO GIVE FREDDIE ADMIN A POSITIVE TRUST VOTE. BUT WHEN I CLICK ON THE HOT LINK TO SEND HER A PRIVATE EMAIL, I GET A PAGE THAT SAYS: "This User is Invalid. You've reached a user that is invalid or no longer exists. If this resulted from a live link, please report this to us (with details)." MY FAITH IN PU HAS ERODED. IS FREDDIE A SOUL-LESS ROBOT THAT CAPTURED MY IMAGINATION OF A CARING, COMPASSIONATE PU STAFFER? CLICK ON THE CAPTCHA THAT PROVES SHE EXISTS. IT DOESN'T EXIST.  | |
|
||
| 02-18-19 01:03pm - 2134 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
EXCUSE THE CAPS. EASIER FOR ME TO SEE AND READ. IF MODELS CAN MAKE THE SAME OR MORE FROM CAM SHOWS, GO FOR IT. EASIER AND SAFER THAN DEALING WITH THE CHANCE OF INFECTION, OTHER PROBLEMS WITH DOING PORN SCENES. I DON'T KNOW WHAT % OF PEOPLE WHO PAY FOR PORN CAM SHOWS ARE DOING IT FOR THERAPY. I IMAGINE A LOT OF THE CUSTOMERS ARE ALSO TEENS, TWENTIES AND OLDER WHO WANT TO SEE NUDIE SHOWS. BUT FROM THE CUSTOMER VIEWPOINT: I IMAGINE A LOT OF THE PU COMMUNITY IS NOT REALLY INTO CAM SHOWS: THEY ARE VERY EXPENSIVE. I REALLY THINK IT'S CHEAPER TO GO TO A NUDE BAR (IF YOU LIVE NEAR ONE) AND WATCH THEIR SHOWS THAN WATCHING CAM SHOWS. YES, THERE ARE FREE ONES, BUT EVEN THE FREE ONES PUSH THE TIPPING FEATURE, AND THEN THEY PUSH EVEN MORE THE PAID PRIVATE SHOWS. FROM THE CUSTOMER VIEWPOINT: MOST PU MEMBERS PAY PORN SITES FOR A MEMBERSHIP. PART OF THE REASON IS TO SUPPORT THE PORN SITES, THAT ARE PRODUCING THE CONTENT THAT THEY ENJOY. IF NO ONE PAID FOR THOSE SITES, THEY WOULD GO OUT OF BUSINESS, AND NO MORE PORN FROM THEM. I'M NOT IN THE PORN BUSINESS, SO DON'T HAVE A SOLID IDEA OF HOW THESE PORN SITES ARE DOING FINANCIALLY, BUT THE MEGA-SITES LIKE METART AND ITS RELATED SITES, AND MPL STUDIOS AND FEMJOY AND OTHER HIGH QUALITY SITES PRODUCE REALLY EXCELLENT QUALITY SOFTCORE PORN, AND WHEN I JOIN, I BELIEVE I'M SUPPORTING THEM TO A SMALL DEGREE. THE SAME WITH THE HARDCORE SITES I JOIN. A PAYING MEMBER IS SUPPORTING THE PRODUCTION OF THE PORN HE LIKES. BUT THE MODELS DOING SOFTCORE SHOOTS EARN VERY LITTLE MONEY, I THINK. THEY WOULD EARN MORE DOING HARDCORE. BUT MOST HARDCORE MODELS ONLY LAST 2 OR 3 YEARS, BEFORE RETIRING. SO THE MONEY IS PROBABLY POOR, IN SPITE OF THE RISK OF DISEASE AND HASSLE OF TESTING AND OTHER PROBLEMS. SO IF A MODEL CAN MAKE AS MUCH OR MORE FROM CAM SHOWS, THAT'S WHAT THEY SHOULD BE DOING, INSTEAD OF SOFTCORE OR HARDCORE PORN. CAM IS EASIER, AND SAFER, AND MORE CONVENIENT. Edited on Feb 19, 2019, 09:08am | |
|
||
| 02-17-19 11:07pm - 2135 days | #1407 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
EXCUSE THE CAPS: THEY'RE EASIER FOR ME TO SEE: TRUMP CLAIMS OBAMA WAS READY TO START A BIG WAR WITH NORTH KOREA. BUT TRUMP SAVED US. BY BEING ELECTED, INSTEAD OF HAVING OBAMA DRAG US INTO A WAR WITH NORTH KOREA. TRUMP IS THE MAN: WHO SAVED US FROM AN OBAMA-WAR WITH NORTH KOREA. ------- ------- Trump claims Obama was ‘so close to starting a big war with North Korea’ Geobeats Feb 16th 2019 10:07PM President Trump has claimed that former President Obama had indicated “he was so close to starting a big war with North Korea.” Trump made the remark Friday during a Rose Garden press conference where he took credit for the U.S.‘s improved relationship with North Korea and its leader Kim Jong-un. Trump said: “When I came into office, I met right there, in the Oval Office, with President Obama. And I sat in those beautiful chairs and we talked. It was supposed to be 15 minutes. As you know, it ended up being many times longer than that.” "I said, ’What’s the biggest problem?’ He said, ‘By far, North Korea.’ And I don’t want to speak for him, but I believe he would have gone to war with North Korea," Trump added. “I think he was ready to go to war. In fact, he told me he was so close to starting a big war with North Korea. And where are we now? No missiles. No rockets. No nuclear testing. We’ve learned a lot.” AdChoices While Trump did not go into specifics, he may have been referring to Obama’s reported consideration of a pre-emptive strike in September 2016 amid the regime’s ramped up missile testing activities. The New York Times notes: “Obama asked if a surgical strike could take out the country’s arsenal, but after being told it would require a ground invasion, he rejected any action as ‘unthinkable.’” | |
|
||
| 02-16-19 10:57pm - 2136 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
DISCLAIMER: CAPS ARE EASIER FOR ME TO READ (AND EDIT). PLEASE EXCUSE MY USAGE. OCCASIONALLY A PU MEMBER CAN BE INACTIVE FOR YEARS, THEN SUDDENLY POP UP ON THE SITE. THIS HAPPENED WITH ACE OF ACES RECENTLY. SO I ASSUME THAT SOME PU MEMBERS EITHER IGNORE THE PU SITE, OR LURK. WHATEVER. PU MEMBERS SHOULD BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE WHENEVER, OR AS LITTLE, AS THEY WANT. I DON'T THINK ANYONE HAS A PROBLEM WITH THAT. IT'S NO BIG ISSUE WITH ME IF A MEMBER'S WIFE, PARTNER, GIRLFRIEND, ROOM-MATE, OR WHATEVER WANTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PU SITE. SO IF MORE THAN ONE PERSON USES THE SAME IP ADDRESS I DON'T CARE. BUT I'M NOT RUNNING THE PU SITE. IF THE PU STAFF WANTS TO MAKE A RULE ABOUT MORE THAN ONE PERSON USING THE SAME IP ADDRESS (AS AN EFFORT TO REDUCE FRAUD, OR JUST TO KEEP THINGS SIMPLE FOR THEM, OR FOR NO REASON AT ALL), FINE: THE PU STAFF -- OR THE PU OWNERS -- ARE THE ONES WHO MAKE THE RULES PU USERS HAVE TO FOLLOW. I ONLY BROUGHT UP THE IDEA OF MORE THAN ONE PERSON USING THE SAME IP ADDRESS BECAUSE I THOUGHT THE GENERAL IDEA WAS TO MAKE SITE PARTICIPATION AS BROAD AS POSSIBLE. AS FAR AS A MEMBER WANTING HIS PARTNER/GIRL FRIEND/WHATEVER TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE RAFFLE: THAT'S AN INDIVIDUAL CHOICE: THE PARTNER/WHATEVER CAN WORK IT OUT WITH THE OTHER PARTNER, WHILE FOLLOWING THE PU RULES THAT APPLY: CAN MORE THAN ONE PERSON USE THE SAME IP ADDRESS TO POST TO THE PU SITE? PU DOES NOT EMPHASIZE GRAMMAR: A LOT OF PU MEMBERS ARE NOT FROM THE US: PU LETS CANADIANS, MAYBE EVEN PEOPLE FROM SOUTH OF THE US BORDER (BELOW TEXAS), MAYBE EVEN FROM SOUTH AMERICA OR EVEN FROM EUROPE OR ASIA (TRUMP NEEDS TO LOOK INTO THIS MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY). SO GRAMMAR IS NOT EMPHASIZED: EVEN PEOPLE FROM ENGLAND, WHO SPEAK AND WRITE A MANGLED FORM OF ENGLISH, ARE ALLOWED INTO THE PU COMMUNITY. IF EXOTICS4ME'S GIRLFRIEND WANTS TO WRITE A REVIEW, OR PUBLISH A POST OR COMMENT OF HER IDEAS, WHETHER SHE HAS ANY TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE OF PHOTO OR VIDEO SEEMS, TO ME, TO BE KIND OF IRRELEVANT: I REALIZE THIS MIGHT BE HERESY, BY TOADSITH'S CHEAT SHEETS. BUT---THE MORE IDEAS AND VIEWPOINTS THAT ARE EXPRESSED IN PU, THE MORE VITAL AND ALIVE THE SITE MIGHT BECOME. THAT'S ONE REASON FOR TRYING TO PUSH A FEMALE VIEWPOINT AT PU. IF SHE CAN COMMUNICATE IN ENGLISH (I'M NOT TRYING TO PUSH FOR SPANISH OR OTHER FOREIGN LANGUAGE POSTS), THAT'S BASICALLY THE ONLY BARRIER SHE HAS TO PASS TO POST AT PU. ASSUMING SHE WANTS TO POST AT PU. OR- IF SHE IS MORE COMFORTABLE LETTING EXOTICS4ME TO POST HER THOUGHTS, THAT'S FINE BY ME. I JUST THINK THAT A FRIEND, PARTNER, GIRL-FRIEND, BOY-FRIEND, WHATEVER, SHOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE THAT CHOICE OF CHOOSING TO POST OR NOT. I FAIL TO SEE WHY EXOTICS4ME HAS TO APOLOGIZE FOR HIS PARTNERS/GIRL-FRIENDS/WHATEVER EXPERIENCE OR NOT. AND IF SHE HAS ACCESS TO PORN SITES THROUGH HER CONNECTION TO EXOTICS4ME, I HONESTLY THINK SHE HAS THE RIGHT TO PUBLISH HER IDEAS ON SITES: -AS LONG AS SHE IS A MEMBER OF THE PU COMMUNITY. -OR SHE CAN HIDE BEHIND EXOTICS4ME'S IDENTITY, AND PUBLISH UNDER HIS LICENSE TO PUBLISH. THE PU SITE IS NOT SET UP TO P0LICE EACH ENTRY AND POST/REVIEW/COMMENT TO THE SITE. I'M NOT RECOMMENDING FLOUTING PU RULES. BUT THIS IS BASICALLY A COMMUNITY WHERE PEOPLE CAN SHARE IDEAS OR THOUGHTS ON PORN. SIDE NOTE: THE PU STAFF CAN RULE ON WHETHER A PARTNER'S ACCESS TO A PORN SITE (ASSUMING THE PARTNER IS A PU MEMBER) GIVES HIM/HER/WHATEVER THE RIGHT TO MAKE COMMENTS OR REVIEWS ON PORN SITES. THE PU STAFF DOES NOT REQUIRE, AS OF YET, PROOF OF ACTIVE MEMBERSHIP TO A PORN SITE BEFORE ACCEPTING A COMMENT, REVIEW, WHATEVER. THE STAFF IS NOT SET UP FOR IT: WE FUNCTION ON A BASIS OF TRUST. YES, THE PU SITE COULD REQUIRE PHOTO COPIES FROM EACH MEMBER OF CONFIRMING EMAILS OR OTHER PROOF OF PORN SITE MEMBERSHIP. ARE THEY UP TO THE ADDED WORK-LOAD? WOULDN'T IT BE MORE PRODUCTIVE TO LET THEM DECIDE WHERE TO PUT THEIR TIME AND ENERGY AND IDEAS TO IMPROVE THE SITE EXPERIENCE, INSTEAD OF MAKING A BUREAUCRATIC NIGHTMARE WITH MISTRUST AND SUSPICION AND THE THREATS OF RED SCARES/SOCIALISM/TRUMPISM? GIVE ME LIBERTY, OR GIVE ME DEATH, CRY I, IN THE MEMORY OF THAT FREEDOM FIGHTER, PATRICK HENRY, WHO WANTED A FREE AND OPEN PU SOCIETY. | |
|
||
| 02-16-19 03:49pm - 2136 days | #14 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
EXCUSE THE CAPS. EASIER FOR ME TO SEE CAPS, READ, EDIT, ETC. ADULT TIME ISSUED A PRESS RELEASE AROUND 2019-01-15 THAT IT FINISHED BETA TESTING. NORMALLY THAT MEANS YOU ARE NOW SEEING THE FINISHED PRODUCT. HOWEVER, AS EXOTICS4ME (IS THAT THE FATHER OF exotics4me, OR JUST A RELATIVE[joke]?) POINTS OUT, THE SITE YOU JOIN THROUGH CAN AFFECT SOME OF THE ADULT TIME SITES YOU GET ACCESS TO. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT GETTING ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK BY JOINING ONE OF THE SITES IN THE ADULT TIME NETWORK IS STILL BEING HANDLED ON A RANDOM BASIS. THIS POINT OF RANDOM ACCESS TO ADULT TIME NETWORK BY JOINING ONE OF THE SATELLITE SITES WAS TOLD TO ME BY A CUSTOMER SERVICE REP ON ONE OF ADULT TIME SITES (AFTER THE JANUARY NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT THAT ADULT TIME HAD FINISHED BETA TESTING). THE ONLY SURE WAY OF GETTING ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK IS APPARENTLY JOINING THE ADULT TIME NETWORK DIRECTLY. WHICH IS FAR MORE EXPENSIVE THAN JOINING ONE OF THE SATELLITE SITES ON A DISCOUNTED MEMBERSHIP. THE BEST TIMES FOR DISCOUNTED MEMBERSHIPS ARE DURING HOLIDAYS, AND PORN SITES QUITE OFTEN HAVE DISCOUNTED MEMBERSHIPS AVAILABLE DURING HOLIDAYS, IN RECENT YEARS (MAYBE AN EFFECT OF THE FINANCIAL DOWNTURN THAT STARTED IN 2008 AND IS STILL BEING FELT TODAY IN THE PORN WORLD). I WAS TOLD PREVIOUSLY THAT JOINING ANY ONE OF THE ADULT TIME SATELLITE SITES WOULD AUTOMATICALLY GIVE YOU AN ADULT TIME MEMBERSHIP. THIS CAME FROM A CUSTOMER SERVICE REP AT 21 SEXTURY. THIS WAS WHEN ADULT TIME WAS STILL IN BETA TESTING. THAT ADVICE WAS WRONG. TWO EXAMPLES FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE: I AM A MEMBER OF DEVILS FILM. I AM ALSO A MEMBER OF NEW SENSATIONS. SO, ACCORDING TO THE 21 SEXTURY CUSTOMER REP, I SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN AN ADULT TIME MEMBERSHIP FROM BOTH OF THE SITES I WAS A MEMBER OF. BUT I WAS NOT A MEMBER OF ADULT TIME UNTIL I JOINED 21 SEXTURY, WHEN THEY GAVE ME A FREE MEMBERSHIP IN ADULT TIME. APPARENTLY, EVEN THOUGH ADULT TIME SAYS IT'S FINISHED BETA TESTING, THEY ARE STILL PLAYING WITH THE STRUCTURE OF THE NETWORK: THEY ARE ADDING NEW CHANNELS (OTHERWISE CALLED SITES), MAYBE THEY WILL TEST PRICING FOR DIFFERENT MEMBERSHIP PLANS, ETC. THE PRACTICE OF OFFERING ACCESS TO DIFFERENT SITES WITH A BASIC MEMBERSHIP IN ADULT TIME IS CERTAINLY NOT NEW. YEARS AGO, WHEN YOU JOINED THE TEEN MEGA WORLD NETWORK, YOU NEVER KNEW EXACTLY HOW MANY SITES YOU WOULD HAVE ACCESS TO, AND DID NOT KNOW THE NAMES OF ALL THE SITES YOU WOULD HAVE ACCESS TO. AS A MEMBER OF PU, I FOUND THAT PRACTICE FRUSTRATING, AND POSTED SEVERAL COMMENTS AT THE PU SITE, ASKING THE WEBMASTER OF TEEN MEGA WORLD IF HE WOULD LIST THE EXACT SITES YOU GOT ACCESS TO WITH EACH SITE YOU JOINED. BASICALLY, HE IS A NICE MAN, BUT HE'S EASTERN EUROPEAN (PROBABLY RUSSIAN), AND THEY SEEM TO THINK DIFFERENTLY FROM AMERICANS. SO, NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES I ASKED, HE IGNORED ME. OTHER PU MEMBERS WERE ALSO CURIOUS ABOUT WHICH SITES THEY WOULD HAVE ACCESS TO WHEN THEY JOINED ONE OF THE TEEN MEGA WORLD SITES, SO IT WASN'T JUST ME. EVENTUALLY, TEEN MEGA WORLD CHANGED THEIR MEMBERSHIP PLAN, AND BY JOINING ANY ONE SITE IN THE NETWORK, THEY GAVE YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE SITES IN THE NETWORK. WHICH IS THE CURRENT MEMBERSHIP PLAN. NOTE: IF YOU JOIN JOIN TEEN MEGA WORLD, I STRONGLY SUGGEST JOINING THROUGH THE TEEN MEGA WORLD SITE ITSELF. THIS MAKES NAVIGATING THE NETWORK AND SEARCHING FOR A MODEL'S CONTENT AT THE NETWORK MUCH EASIER. TEEN MEGA WORLD DID A NETWORK UPDATE A FEW YEARS AGO. THIS MADE SWITCHING BETWEEN SITES IN THE NETWORK MUCH HARDER. BASICALLY, IF YOU JOIN THROUGH ONE OF THE SATELLITE SITES, YOU HAVE TO LOG IN THROUGH YOUR JOIN SITE. AND WHEN YOU SWITCH TO A DIFFERENT SITE IN THE NETWORK, YOU ARE STILL PARTIALLY LOGGED IN TO YOUR JOIN SITE: YOU DON'T FULLY ENTER THE SITE YOU ARE SWITCHING TO. ALSO, A DIFFERENT PROBLEM: IF YOU JOIN THROUGH ONE OF THE SATELLITE SITES (IN THE TEEN MEGA WORLD NETWORK), YOUR SEARCH FOR THE CONTENT OF A MODEL IS RESTRICTED TO THE SITE YOU JOINED THROUGH. THE SEARCH FOR THE MODEL'S CONTENT WILL ONLY RETURN HER CONTENT AT THE SITE YOU JOINED THROUGH. EVEN WHEN YOU DO (A PARTIAL) SWITCH TO A DIFFERENT SITE IN THE NETWORK, THE SEARCH FOR THE MODEL'S CONTENT WILL ONLY RETURN HER CONTENT AT YOUR JOIN SITE: IT WILL NOT RETURN ANY CONTENT FROM ANY OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, INCLUDING THE SITE YOU ARE CURRENTLY LOGGED IN TO. IF YOU JOIN THROUGH THE TEEN MEGA WORLD SITE, YOUR SWITCH FROM ONE SITE TO ANOTHER IS MORE COMPLETE: YOU CAN MORE EASILY EXPLORE THE CONTENT OF EACH SITE. AND JUST AS IMPORTANT, THE SEARCH FOR A MODEL'S CONTENT RETURNS HER CONTENT AT THE ENTIRE NETWORK. IT BRINGS UP HER VIDEOS WITH HOT LINKS THAT MAKE IT EASY TO ACCESS THAT CONTENT. SO MUCH EASIER AND FASTER, TO EXPLORE AND ENJOY THE CONTENT OF THE NETWORK, IF YOU JOIN THROUGH THE TEEN MEGA WORLD SITE, INSTEAD OF JOINING THROUGH ONE OF THE SATELLITE SITES. GETTING BACK THE ADULT TIME: ADULT TIME MIGHT HAVE PROBLEMS. BUT, IN MY OPINION, THEY ARE MINOR. ADULT TIME, BECAUSE OF THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF HIGH QUALITY PORN, IS ONE OF THE BEST BARGAINS IN PORN TODAY. A LARGE NUMBER OF PORN STARS, MASSIVE QUANTITY OF PORN, HIGH QUALITY OF PORN. SO MAYBE IT'S NOT A PERFECT NETWORK, BUT IT'S ONE OF BEST OUT THERE. HOWEVER, I ALSO ENJOY TEEN MEGA WORLD AND THE DIESEL NETWORK (ALL FINE GIRLS, WOW GIRLS, WOW PORN) AS FINE TEEN PORN NETWORKS. I'M THINKING OF COPYING WHAT I WROTE, AND SUBMITTING IT AS A REVIEW: BUT NOT SURE WHAT SITE I WOULD LIST IT UNDER. BUT IT PASSES THE MINIMUM WORD COUNT FOR A REVIEW, I THINK. HOWEVER, I MIGHT GET DINGED FOR REPEATING A PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED POST. Edited on Feb 16, 2019, 04:01pm | |
|
||
| 02-16-19 01:26am - 2136 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I don't see any sense or purpose in excluding someone from the raffle if they write a review that earns one point or more. Whether they are male or female. A partner, wife, or companion of a PU member. Also, the idea of offering a 30-day membership in place of a prize does not make a lot of sense. First prize is $100, which more than covers almost all porn site memberships. Second and third prizes are $50, which also more than covers most porn site memberships. Of course, the prize is not cash, but an Amazon gift certificate, but the Amazon gift certificate is almost the equivalent of cash. You can run a member poll asking if a PU member would prefer an Amazon gift certificate for $50 versus a 30-day membership. My guess is that few, if any PU members, would take the 30-day membership. Although there are a few sites that might charge more than $50/month, but they are rare. And not very popular, I'm guessing. Could you expand on IP fraud and rigging the raffle? Using worthless reviews to enter the raffle seems to be the only obvious ploy I can think of. Should we be looking for mafia connections in the background of PU members (joke, but not a very funny one). IP: a PU member using more than one alias to enter the raffle? To promote porn sites that he is getting paid to promote? I assume this has happened, but I also guess it's kind of rare for the PU site. But if a PU member has the technical expertise to use different aliases, I also assume it would be difficult to detect it. That is assuming the thief has the ability to cover his tracks, with VPN and other tools. My best guess is that most PU members give honest reviews and comments. At least, that's the way I see it. Edited on Feb 16, 2019, 01:30am | |
|
||
| 02-15-19 09:01am - 2137 days | #8 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
SO NO INTEREST IN THE ALITA OR THE BRIE LARSON CAPTAIN MARVEL MOVIES? SEEMS LIKE PU MEMBERS HAVE GIVEN UP ON SEEING A MOVIE IN A THEATER. OR ELSE COMMENTING ON THEM. I KNOW IT'S CHEAPER TO WAIT TO WATCH IN CABLE, OR DVD, AND THAT SEEMS TO BE WHAT PU MEMBERS PREFER. OR ELSE THEY DON'T HAVE ANY INTEREST IN WATCHING A LOT OF MOVIES, ANYWAY. WHEN OR WHAT WERE THE LAST GOOD MOVIES ANYONE SAW? I THOUGHT WONDER WOMAN WAS PRETTY GOOD. ALSO, BOTH SICARIO MOVIES WERE GOOD. ALSO, WIND RIVER (THE MOVIE DIRECTED BY THE SICARIO WRITER) WAS GOOD, TOO. | |
|
||
| 02-14-19 11:10am - 2138 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
IT'S 11:04AM IN NORTHERN LA COUNTY. THE TEMP IS 59 DEGREES F, AND THERE IS HEAVY RAIN. I'M THINKING OF MOVING TO HAWAII, WHERE I HOPE THE WEATHER IS EVEN BETTER THAN WHERE I LIVE. I WANT SUNSHINE, 70-80 DEGREES F, NO RAIN, AND NO VOLCANOES. ALSO, A BEACH FRONT SHACK WITH RUNNING WATER AND ALL THE AMENITIES, FOR $60/MONTH. (I GREW UP IN THE 1960s, BEFORE RUNAWAY INFLATION HIT ALL THE PRICES.) ANYONE AT PU HAVE ANY RENTALS IN MY PRICE RANGE? IS THIS SPAM? I KNOW IT'S OFF-TOPIC. BUT CREATURE COMFORTS ARE IMPORTANT, AS WE GROW OLDER. | |
|
||
| 02-14-19 10:55am - 2138 days | #511 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
THANKS TO FREDDIE AND THE PU STAFF FOR THE AMAZON GIFT CARD. YOU NEED A SMALL APP THAT WILL OPEN ON A RECIPIENT'S DESKTOP AND START SOUNDING BELLS AND WHISTLES TO LET HIM/HER KNOW THE CARD HAS ARRIVED. I GET SO MUCH SPAM IN MY INBOX, I DIDN'T SEE THE GIFT CARD UNTIL THE FOLLOWING DAY. BUT THANKS AGAIN, FREDDIE. YOU ARE THE BEST. | |
|
||
| 02-14-19 09:58am - 2138 days | #1406 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
MONICA WITT, A US AIR FORCE OFFICER, DEFECTS TO IRAN. NO REAL DETAILS ON THE BACKGROUND OF THIS TRAITOR HAVE BEEN RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC. BUT THIS CASE SMELLS. IT SMELLS LIKE DONALD TRUMP'S TRACKS. TRUMP BRUTALIZES WOMEN, AND CLAIMS HE IS THE PRESIDENT, SO HE IS COVERED BY POLITICAL IMMUINITY. BULLSHIT. TRUMP IS UNDER THE LAW, NOT ABOVE THE LAW. WE ARE A NATION UNDER GOD, UNDER LAWS. TRUMP CAN SPEW ALL THE LIES HE WANTS: BUT EVENTUALLY, THE COURTS WILL DRAG DOWN THIS LIAR, THIS PERVERT. WRITTEN IN THE NAME OF POLITICAL LICENSE. WHEN WILL TRUMP BE FORCED TO WEAR AN ORANGE JUMP SUIT, PUT IN PRISON, AND THEN GANG-RAPED LIKE HE HAS RAPED AMERICA? STAY TUNED TO FURTHER ADVENTURES OF THE TRUMP CRIME FAMILY, WHICH IS BEGINNING TO CRUMBLE UNDER THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAWSUITS THAT ARE COMING. ------- ------- Monica Witt: US Air Force officer defects to Iran with information 'seriously damaging' to national security, officials reveals Chris Riotta ,The Independent•February 13, 2019 A US Air Force officer has defected to Iran and shared information that could cause "serious damage" to America's national security, officials have revealed. The former Air Force intelligence specialist was charged with espionage and was accused of working for Iran, according to an unsealed federal indictment. The announcement arrived after Assistant Attorney General for National Security John Demers and other senior officials held a call with reporters to discuss what they called “a national security related action involving Iran”. Mr Demers was joined by US Attorney for Washington, Jessie Liu, FBI Executive Assistant Director for National Security Jay Tabb, Treasury Department director of Foreign Assets Control Adrea Gacki and Air Force Office of Special Investigations Special Agent Terry Phillips. The officials discussed the unsealed indictment against Monica Witt, a former counterintelligence officer for the Air Force Office of Special Investigations. Ms Witt defected to Iran nearly six years ago in 2013. Also charged are four Iranian hackers. Prosecutors say they targeted former colleagues of Ms Witt’s in the intelligence community. The indictment says the four Iranians were acting on behalf of the government-linked Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps. “It is a sad day for America when one of its citizens betrays our country,” Mr Demers, the head of the Justice Department’s national security division, said on the call. Ms Witt remains at-large. The 39-year-old “has been indicted by a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia for conspiracy to deliver and delivering national defence information to representatives of the Iranian government,” according to the indictment that was unsealed on Wednesday morning. “Witt, who defected to Iran in 2013, is alleged to have assisted Iranian intelligence services in targeting her former fellow agents in the US Intelligence Community (USIC). Witt is also alleged to have disclosed the code name and classified mission of a US Department of Defence Special Access Program,” the indictment continues. A warrant has been placed for her arrest. The four hackers, whose names are Mojtaba Masoumpour, Behzad Mesri, Hossein Parvar and Mohamad Paryar, have also been charged with conspiracy, attempts to commit computer intrusion and aggravated identity theft. Their alleged crimes date back to 2014 through 2015, in which they are charged with “using fictional and imposter social media accounts and working on behalf of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), sought to deploy malware that would provide them covert access to the targets’ computers and networks.” The hackers, referred to in the indictment as “Cyber Conspirators,” also remain at-large and have warrants placed for each other their arrests. US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said the agency was “taking action against “malicious Iranian cyber actors and covert operations that have targeted Americans at home and overseas as part of our ongoing efforts to counter the Iranian regime’s cyber-attacks.” “Treasury is sanctioning New Horizon Organization for its support to the IRGC-QF,” he continued in a statement. “New Horizon hosts international conferences that have provided Iranian intelligence officers a platform to recruit and collect damaging information. | |
|
||
| 02-13-19 07:38pm - 2139 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'M TOO OLD FOR SHAZAM. BUT ALITA MIGHT BE GOOD. EVEN PAYING FOR THE 3D VERSION. I THINK I ONLY SAW ONE 3D MOVIE IN THE LAST 10 YEARS, DON'T REMEMBER WHAT IT WAS, IT GAVE ME A HEADACHE FROM WATCHING IT. BUT THINKING ABOUT SEEING ALITA IN A THEATER. | |
|
||
| 02-13-19 12:50pm - 2139 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I DON'T REMEMBER EVER SEEING METART OFFERED AT $5 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. AND SEXART IS ALSO AT $5 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. SOME FINE DEALS. EXCEPT I'M ALREADY SIGNED UP TO TOO MANY OF THESE SITES. LOL. | |
|
||
| 02-13-19 12:44pm - 2139 days | #1405 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
TRUMP CAVES IN TO DEMOCRAT DEMANDS. SAYS HE WILL OUTLAW COWS THAT FART AND AIRPLANES THAT FLY IN THE AIR. THIS WILL HELP AMERICA IN THE FIGHT AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING. AND TRUMP WILL CLAIM CREDIT, SINCE THIS IS FOR THE GOOD OF ALL AMERICANS, EVEN THE ONES WITH BLACK, BROWN, OR YELLOW SKIN. TRUMP IS NOT A RACIST. IT'S NOT RACISM FAVORING YOUR OWN KIND OF PEOPLE: MEGA-RICH, WHITE PEOPLE WHO ARE THE REAL OWNERS AND RULERS OF AMERICA, LAND OF THE FREE | |
|
||
| 02-12-19 03:59am - 2140 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
AQUAMAN SEQUEL PLANNED. EVEN THOUGH AQUAMAN SANK AT THE BOX OFFICE, BARELY BREAKING $1 BILLION DOLLARS (US), WARNER BROS WILL BE TRYING AGAIN TO MAKE A SEQUEL THAT DOES BETTER. THERE IS EVEN TALK OF BRINGING BACK JASON MOMOA AS AQUAMAN, BUT THE STUDIO VOWS TO BRING IN PHOTOSHOP EXPERTS TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF MOMOA'S MUSCLES TO MAKE HIM A TRULY IMPRESSIVE FIGURE . | |
|
||
| 02-10-19 08:55am - 2142 days | #338 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
EXCUSE THE CAP LETTERS. OR SKIP MY POSTS, COMMENTS, REVIEWS IF YOU THINK I'M BEING RUDE. IT' EASIER FOR ME TO SEE, READ, EDIT IN CAPS. I GET MORE INFORMATION FROM PU THAN THE TBP SITE. PU IS FROM MEMBERS WHO SHARE THEIR THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS. TBP IS FROM PROFESSIONAL REVIEWERS WHO LIST A LOT OF FACTS, SO IT'S A GOOD SOURCE OF FACTS, BUT THE PU REVIEWERS CAN GIVE A BETTER FLAVOR OF WHAT A PORN SITE IS LIKE. PU IS ALSO A COMMUNITY, WHERE FANS OF PORN CAN SHARE THEIR IDEAS. HOPEFULLY IN A FRIENDLY WAY. | |
|
||
| 02-09-19 04:01pm - 2143 days | #500 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Cybertoad, The site and members will miss you. I only hope you change your mind and return to us. | |
|
||
| 02-09-19 12:54am - 2143 days | #97 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
@Toadsith, The return of the master. Did Gort come as well? Fear the disintegration ray from Gort's head. That will destroy the evil doers on the PU site. Welcome back, master of the cheat sheet. | |
|
||
| 02-08-19 05:15pm - 2144 days | #488 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I second that. More participation by the webmaster and other PU staff members would be positive. Also, the Sites Not Listed thread seems to be ignored by current management. Or maybe it was just forgotten. Listing new sites on PU seems like a no-brainer. You want as many sites you can get, if they will bring in revenues to the PU site through referrals. I assume that's what the PU site is based on. It might be hard work, reaching out to all the new sites, but when a PU member adds a new site to that thread, or a new thread on the same subject, someone in the PU staff should make an effort to get the new site listed. (I realize that some sites make it a problem to have a PU listing, but it would be nice if the PU staff let us members know that an attempt has been made, and that our requests for a new listing is not just being ignored.) | |
|
||
| 02-08-19 04:43pm - 2144 days | #486 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I think that saying we live in a Yelp world is poor. PU is better than Yelp. It's members should have more trust or faith in the site (reviews, comments, posts) than the short reviews that Yelp publishes. The PU staff is supposed be running the site, and, to the extent possible, checking that the user-submitted reviews, comments, posts etc. make sense, and serve some purpose. Not all comments and posts have to deal with porn. The staff allows off-topic comments and posts. (I would have been suspended long ago for my off-topic posts if the PU staff required everything to deal with porn.) But I feel that the PU site has more integrity than the Yelp site: Yelp doesn't check on the accuracy of the user-submitted reviews. It doesn't require the reviews to meet any standards, that I know of, unlike PU, which does require the reviews to meet certain standards (the pros, cons, bottom line sections are supposed to be filled with meaningful facts or opinions). The PU reviews, in my opinion, are among the best reviews on the internet: they are not all puff pieces that some review sites seem to be. I'm certainly not saying that all PU reviews are masterpieces. But most of them seem be an honest reflection of what the reviewer thinks or feels. And a lot of the reviews give some indication, to me, at least, on whether a site fits my interests, or is worth joining. Which is the point of what the review should be doing. So, does PU serve a purpose, in a world where Yelp exists? PU serves a purpose, where people interested in paying for porn, can find reviews that are not puff-pieces, that try to give an honest opinion of porn sites that charge for memberships. And the comment and threads can hit on porn-related and non-porn related issues. | |
|
||
| 02-08-19 04:24pm - 2144 days | #484 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Site participation has been declining. You state that the previous management team told you the site participation was declining in the months (or longer) before your team took over. And the original team (with Khan) wasn't sure how to stop that decline and make the site grow. I assume that the decline has gone on until recently. I don't have any strong suggestions on how to reverse that decline. One point I've noticed: a number of members accounts were suspended or disabled or whatever term you want to use. I assume some software program was used to find and disable those member accounts. I suspect that at least some of the suspensions were in error. SelenaMetArt, who works for the MetArt network of porn sites, was suspended. And then her account was reactivated. I don't know how many other PU members had their account suspended. Was there a reason why those accounts were suspended? You are trying to increase PU membership. Suspending members, without a good reason, seems to be counterproductive to increasing membership. Did the software program you used to suspend members give a reasonable reason for suspension? Or was it a flawed software program? Are you kicking out members who might not deserve to be kicked out? I posted a while back when I noticed that SelenaMetArt was suspended. I wrote that she was a valuable contributor to the PU site, because she was friendly, courteous, and offered help and knowledge to to other PU members when they had a problem with one of the MetArt sites. My post was apparently ignored, or passed over, but then SelenaMetArt's account was enabled, and she is now able to post again at PU. But my point is: if a friendly, courteous, helpful PU member like SelenaMetArt was suspended, why did you suspend her? Is your software to suspend PU members useful? Does it find PU members who contribute to the site, and suspend them? PU has the right to suspend anyone, without giving a reason. I believe that's written somewhere in the rules. And the suspension is definite, as long as PU says it is. I believe shills and people who post false reviews and spam should be suspended. But I also believe that your software has probably suspended some members for no reason that I can think of. | |
|
||
| 101-150 of 3618 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | Page 3 | 4 | 15 | 26 | 37 | 48 | 59 | 72 | 73 | Next Page > |
|
