|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
lk2fireone (0)
|
| 3551-3600 of 3618 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 13 | 24 | 35 | 46 | 57 | 71 | Page 72 | 73 | Next Page > |
| 03-17-09 07:13pm - 5758 days | #4 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Taking a wild guess, based on nothing more than a gut feeling, I would say that Cybertoad and WeeWillyWinky disabled their accounts to take a break from porn. They probably figured they were in danger of overdosing. Yes, it would have been nice if they had said good-bye before leaving. But this is the Internet, where connections are easily broken. Hoping they will return some time in the future. They were both strong contributors to this site. | |
|
||
| 03-16-09 09:35pm - 5759 days | #17 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I saw the original Star Trek series when it was playing on TV as a new series. That's the only Star Trek series I've seen. I was a big fan of the series at the time. Then, 20+ years later, I saw re-runs of the original series, and thought, "Jeez, why did I like this cheesy series so much when I first saw it?" I also saw Firefly, and really enjoyed that. Did not mind any stupidities in the Firefly series, because the series was poking fun at itself, unlike the original Star Trek series which was supposed to be taken more seriously (for a science fiction series, except for a small amount of humor). | |
|
||
| 03-09-09 01:10pm - 5767 days | #13 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I get the regular spam that everyone else seems to get. So far, the spam does not contain my name, just my email address. What is a little funny, though, is that some of the spam I get has, for the sender's email address, my email address. That does not make a whole bunch of sense. Does the spammer think that I would not remember sending spam email to myself? | |
|
||
| 03-05-09 08:57pm - 5770 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
badandy400 took the words out of my mouth (or maybe my brain.) This is the only place I talk about porn (except maybe posting comments once in a while to some porn sites I might be a member of). | |
|
||
| 02-18-09 01:52pm - 5786 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
TheSquirrel and Khan make a lot of sense. You don't get to see much of interest when the couple is in the missionary position, other than the backside of the man on top and maybe the faces. Even Drooler would lose interest fast, since it's the woman's backside he wants to see, and not the man's. Edited on Feb 18, 2009, 01:58pm | |
|
||
| 02-15-09 03:47am - 5789 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Reviews should be a mixture of technical facts and personal opinions. The personal opinions are what give the review its flavor. I'm not big on technical details. A lot of PU members want a bunch of tech details included in every review. So, it's a nice idea to give at least a few tech details in a review. But I'm much more interested in the personal opinion of what the reviewer likes/dislikes. As far as quality, quantity, site ease of use, and price, which are the basic factors in the score of a site as far as I am concerned, I would much rather read a review by someone that clearly shows why he/she likes or dislikes a site, rather than read a so-called "unbiased, professional" review. If you like the models on a site, say so, and maybe mention 2 or 3 that you really like, so the reader can see what you go for, if there are only a limited number of attractive models on that site. But for a mega-site like Met-art, there are over 100+ gorgeous models on that site, so if you are into softcore teen glamor, there's something for almost everyone. So picking out 2 or 3 models from that range is far less meaningful or useful. I don't really care to read boring reviews. A little humor can be nice, and Drooler writes reviews that can be informative and enjoyable. Most of us read the reviews to get an idea of sites we might like to join. Personally, I think it's more helpful/useful/meaningful if you give higher grades to the sites you personally like, rather than trying to give an "artificially" high score to some site that you think merits a high score due to some sort of technical excellence or technical quality or whatever, but that same site doesn't really turn you on that much. Porn is a personal taste. Not everyone enjoys the same diet. But if you show your opinions in your reviews, that is the real contribution. Along with pointing out any major pluses or faults a site may have. I think I've been infected by your rambling style of writing. Lol. | |
|
||
| 02-15-09 02:19am - 5789 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Met-art is my all-time favorite site. A softcore teen site, they have gorgeous models, high-quality pix, a huge quantity of models and photosets to look at, 3-4 updates per day of nice-sized photosets of 100+ pix per photoset. What makes it even better is the low annual fee of $99, or the low monthly fee of $20. Their videos are softcore and boring. But Met-art is the best site for softcore teen pix on the Internet. | |
|
||
| 02-11-09 05:26pm - 5792 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
My all-time favorite is 3. Mr. Head-up-his-ass. That was a classic, and I was sorry to see it retired. | |
|
||
| 02-08-09 02:56am - 5796 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Never saw Shivers (1975), but did see most of Cronenberg's other films. He is strong on violence and horror. Crash (1996) was a critically praised film he directed. The idea was that the violence and damage from car crashes unleashes/renews sexual energy. I did not enjoy Crash (1996). I liked the earlier pulp or grade B Cronenberg films much more, such as: Rabid (1977), the first film of Cronenberg I saw in a theater The Brood (1979) Scanners (1981) Videodrome (1983) By the time of The Dead Zone (1983) and The Fly (1986), Cronenberg had moved up to much bigger commercial projects, and his films are now nominated for Oscars and other awards, but they don't have the same impact on me as his early movies. The early films were, at the time, almost like a kick in the head. I saw Marilyn Chambers, star of Rabid (1977) and a bunch of famous porn films at a Glamourcon convention in Los Angeles a few years ago, and she still looks very good. Edited on Feb 08, 2009, 03:05am | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 02:19pm - 5798 days | #11 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Vampyres (1975) Starring: Marianne Morris, Anulka Dziubinska Director: José Ramón Larraz Cult horror classic with sex and blood. Considered porn at the time, but PU members would probably consider this soft-core today (too much story and not enough close-up of the sex, sex only a small part of the actual screen time). If you're into old-style horror, vampires, and lust, blood, this is a good bet. Anulka Dziubinska, one of the two vampires in this movie, was Playboy Playmate of the Month, May 1973. A gorgeous blonde. Great face, fantastic body. There are 2 dvd versions out. If you can get the Blue Underground version, that has a few more extras. I think both the Blue Underground and the Anchor Bay DVDs have a commentary by the director, which is both interesting and funny to hear. But the Blue Underground version also has interviews from several years ago with the two female stars, Anulka Dziubinska and Marianne Morris. Edited on Feb 06, 2009, 02:32pm | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 01:58pm - 5798 days | #10 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
"Lust, Caution" (2007), a film with explicit sex highlighted by Toadsith, is extremely well-done. If you're not looking for porn but want a movie with high erotic content, that is a good choice. The heroine is gorgeous, and the story is interesting. A non-porn movie with some softcore sex, not a real classic, but interesting as an example of French horror/humor/sex, is Frankenstein '90 (1984). I really enjoyed the French take on this updated version of Frankenstein. | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 08:48am - 5798 days | #4 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Rabid (1977) Not really a porn film, but a good grade B horror movie with an interesting twist on violent sex (not the same as the abusive sex in current porn). Starring Marilyn Chambers. Written and directed by David Cronenberg. | |
|
||
| 02-05-09 11:27pm - 5798 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Three classics from the 70s: Emmanuelle, Part 1 (1974) Emmanuelle, Part 2 (1975) Histoire d'O, aka The Story of O (1975) | |
|
||
| 01-26-09 11:59am - 5809 days | #4 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Sorry that WeeWillyWinky has disabled his account. Hoping to see him back here soon. Is there any way to send him an email, just wishing him well? | |
|
||
| 01-24-09 06:14am - 5811 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
The thinking seems to be: the more, the merrier. PU wants as many members as possible. So unless a new member is definitely doing something wrong, such as spamming or posting fake reviews or whatever, he should be welcomed to the site. As regards Toadsith as a mod, why not, if he agrees? I think everyone respects the quality of his reviews and his posts. Drooler would be a good choice for another mod. He is here all the time, he's got brains, humor, knowledge, etc. | |
|
||
| 01-22-09 02:02pm - 5813 days | #8 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'm sure you have already heard plenty about the health risks of smoking. One of the side issues, though, is that illness or poor health can be irritating or painful. I have asthma, and I used to wake up gasping for breath every morning. The first thing I did was to use my puffer to get an albuterol fix. That allowed me to breathe more easily. Since I gave up smoking, I can now breathe much more easily. I only use an albuterol puffer a few times a month, instead of every day of the week. That's just me. Hopefully, you will never have that problem. But there are a lot of painful and irritating health issues that can affect anyone, because of smoking. Everyone is better off health-wise, if there is less smoking. People live longer, and have less health problems while they are alive. You don't really appreciate good health, until you start to lose it. Then you think, I'd sure like to have less pain. Or have the endurance I had 20 years ago. Sorry if this comes across as preaching. I just wish I had been smarter when I was young and never started smoking. Regards. | |
|
||
| 01-22-09 07:56am - 5813 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
You would be doing yourself a big favor if you can give up smoking. There are all kinds of health problems that are related to smoking. Don't mean to preach. But I smoked over 35 years, probably did damage to my body. I breathe easier today since I quit smoking. You can use the money you save by not smoking to buy extra porn. | |
|
||
| 01-19-09 04:23pm - 5815 days | #18 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Please, let's keep this site clean. Lol. | |
|
||
| 01-17-09 03:05pm - 5818 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I would assume that the site issuing the pass would strongly discourage sharing or selling a password. Because there is no way they could control that type of activity except to try to cancel the membership if the site found out. They could not trust in an honor system where someone who buys the membership will not try to use the membership, along with selling or giving it away to others. The PU site has no control over the site memberships that you purchase. So I would assume the PU site has no rules about what you do with your membership. But the PU site, I would assume, would in general be against sharing or giving a site membership away to some other person to use. That's just my impression. | |
|
||
| 01-17-09 07:28am - 5818 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I've got problems recognizing a model just from her ass. But I wouldn't mind seeing Nikky Case's first photoset for met-art displayed in huge size on my hometown buildings. The photoset was named "Nikky Case", and was posted 2006.08.19, and was the first time I saw the lovely model. Instant love, on my part. Larger screens and higher definition are supposed to improve the experience. But I can't really afford anything better at this time. It's amazing to me how much computer equipment prices keep dropping. I really drool over all the eye candy I'd like to buy. Edited on Jan 17, 2009, 07:37am | |
|
||
| 01-16-09 08:58pm - 5818 days | #118 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I liked Jim Caviezel in Angel Eyes. The Prisoner will also have Ian McKellen, so it might be worth watching. | |
|
||
| 01-16-09 11:12am - 5819 days | #116 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Wittyguy, your best avatar, by far, was the "Mr. Head-up-his-ass." That was cool, mysterious, thought-provoking, and a whole bunch more. | |
|
||
| 01-15-09 01:48pm - 5820 days | #12 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Quoted by a big dog that drools. Lol. | |
|
||
| 01-15-09 10:40am - 5820 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Personally, I've always thought my reviews rated at least 100 stars apiece. I know the PU staff might not agree, but I'm the expert on my reviews, since I'm the one who wrote them. There are many reviews that don't really contribute a whole lot, but as TheSquirrel pointed out, PU doesn't want to discourage people from writing reviews, so all reviews are posted, unless there is some issue with falsification or some such. Anyway, I personally don't mind wading thru the reviews. Sometimes you get interesting or informative or humorous highlights that are worth reading, in addition to a strong recommendation or a strong disapproval of some site you might be interested in joining. As far as separating the good reviews from the bad reviews into a separate listing, it seems like an extra chore for the PU staff that is not really worthwhile. The PU staff does evaluate each review for approval or not, as well as assigning a rating of poor, good, or excellent to the review (that gives the review writer credit towards a raffle ticket). Maybe PU could include a brief notation by each review on the review rating, whether the PU staff gave the review itself 0, 1, 2, or 3 tickets, or 0, 1, 2 or 3 equivalent stars. | |
|
||
| 01-14-09 09:56am - 5821 days | #103 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Patrick McGoohan, the actor/director/writer, died yesterday, Jan. 13, 2009. He could have been a much bigger name if he wanted. He turned down the roles of Gandalf in the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy and Dumbledore in the "Harry Potter" films. Also turned down the chance to play The Saint and James Bond. I really liked him in Danger Man and The Prisoner. Edited on Jan 14, 2009, 10:12am | |
|
||
| 01-13-09 10:36pm - 5821 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Porn and sex are supposed to be more equal opportunity these days, so I would guess there are at least a few female PU members. The main value of the site is in the reviews, giving a basis for joining or not joining sites you might be interested in. The forum, polls, etc. can be interesting/entertaining reading, as well as a chance to chime in with your own opinion. But like Wittyguy implies, females don't normally shout out their sexual orientation in a porn site. | |
|
||
| 01-13-09 01:08am - 5822 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
There is a column posted at Market Watch (a site that covers business news and the stock market) about the AVN Adult Entertainment Expo, which was held January 8 - 11, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Ad...wds/story.aspx?guid={7F1CBF05-8827-49B2-B451-F4EC3132CBB0} The column talks about how the recession is hurting the porn industry. But an even bigger factor in lost revenue is competition from free, amateur content on the Internet. Larry Flynt (publisher of Hustler) recently wrote to Congress asking for a $5 billion government bailout, saying adult DVD sales and rentals are down 22%. I guess Flynt believes that porn is socially acceptable and is entitled to the same government handouts that the banking, brokerage, and auto industries are going to get. The porn industry is looking at ways to increase revenues. One idea is to use 3D technology. But 3D technology is still very expensive, and it's limited to mainstream, commercial films. But I found it interesting that a major financial news site did a column on the adult entertainment industry convention. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 04:44am - 5832 days | #11 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I thought it was cute when I first saw some photos of a model giving the finger. But that was many years ago. Now the effect is small to none. If the picture is good, it's still a keeper. If the picture is poor, then trash it. The older you get, the harder it is to enjoy the freshness of new photography, because you've seen almost all of it before. But there's still a ton of great looking girls out there, and pix are the best way of capturing their beauty and freshness. | |
|
||
| 12-29-08 06:55am - 5837 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Great ideas for a post. Enjoyed reading your thoughts. I've always thought that it was much easier to find good pix than good vids, for many reasons. You would think that it would be easy to find good vids, but in addition to personal taste, there are a multitude of reasons good vids are hard to find. Also, pix take less space to store on a hard drive and are much easier and cheaper to view. As a side note: Your icon pig looks like a nasty brute. Pigs are intelligent, which fits the sense of your post. But could you change your pig to something friendlier/more accessible? | |
|
||
| 12-25-08 07:48am - 5841 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
The proper answer to "Who is buried in Grant's tomb?" is "No one". No one is buried in the tomb. (It's a tomb, not a hole in the ground where you bury somebody.) But both Grant and his favorite ride are supposed to be inside the tomb. | |
|
||
| 12-22-08 05:47pm - 5843 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Everybody has different ideas on what makes an attractive site. Most people have limited porn dollars. Sites that are just starting out usually have very limited number of models and limited amount of content, making them expensive for what they are offering. Is there some way you could do a deal linking with some other sites that are just starting out, or that have a limited amount of content, and share the membership revenues between you? I don't know the mechanics involved, or what would be a fair distribution of the shared membership fees, but it seems like an approach that might be useful. I would think that a new site would have a very difficult time building a membership base, especially in today's economic downturn. | |
|
||
| 12-19-08 01:44pm - 5847 days | #11 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Is your new nurse better looking? And that's why you shot the old one? Good-looking girls are the only ones worth watching, in my opinion. | |
|
||
| 12-19-08 01:35pm - 5847 days | #21 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Totally agree with you on that one, Cybertoad (previously known as Toadmix). Lol. | |
|
||
| 12-19-08 10:00am - 5847 days | #19 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Liana Shevchenko only modeled porn for about 2 years. She was not a superstar, just a very good-looking young girl. That's why it's not easy finding current information about her on the Internet. If you do google searches about much more popular people in the entertainment industry, trying to find information about their current activities, you often come up with little or no current information, unless they are superstars or very popular. So solid proof that she is alive or dead might be difficult or almost impossible to find. | |
|
||
| 12-19-08 09:53am - 5847 days | #18 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
On youtube, I currently see 2 videos with Liana Shevchenko. I did not say the videos were fake. The videos are poor copies that were probably taken from the 8teenies site, where she was named Melissa. The videos are real. I just don't believe the girl is dead based on the fact the poster titles the videos with RIP. I need a bit more proof. Maybe that's my hang-up. I've heard that youtube has removed videos because of copyright concerns. I've never heard that youtube bothers to check the factual accuracy of a RIP titled video of a former pornstar. Cheers. RIP Liana Shevchenko (Isabelle, Melissa), Ukraine candid dance. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlEAvixYai8 RIP Liana Shevchenko (Isabella, Melissa), Ukraine model dance part 2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4iMVFvni...&feature=related | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 09:35am - 5848 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Just because a few people post that Liana Shevchenko is dead, does give me hard evidence she is dead. I saw a couple of youtube videos with a title that Liana was dead. Means very little as far as proof is concerned. I saw the blogs you posted: http://lianashevchenko.wordpress.com/ http://ukraine-girl.blogspot.com/ http://technorati.com/videos/tag/models+rip The first blog (URL) above says she is dead, but gives no details. The second blog (URL) above does not say she is dead, just has a link to some photos of her. The third blog (URL) has links to dead models, but I don't see Liana Shevchenko listed. For proof of death, I would like to see either a newspaper article quoted, where I can check the article itself for details, or a magazine article, where I could again check the article itself. Some unknown person posting that Liana Shevchenko has died has very little basis for proof. Below are listed true cases where people were reported dead, long before they actually died: ABE VIGODA often looked dead on the 1970s sitcom Barney Miller, where he played the gloomy and rumpled Detective Sgt. Phil Fish. In 1992 People magazine reported that Vigoda was dead, and by 2001 Vigoda's presumed demise had become such a pop culture joke that even the New York Times mentioned it in a story on his 80th birthday. In 1999 Vigoda almost made the rumors come true: he was a passenger on an American Airlines flight that lost pressure at 31,000 feet. The plane made an emergency landing and everyone (including Vigoda) survived. ALEXANDER THE GREAT was still new at the king business in 335 B.C. When the citizens of Thebes heard a rumor that he had died, they revolted against Macedonian rule. Bad move: within a fortnight Alexander and his army marched south and sacked the city. Alexander really did die in 323 B.C.E., under mysterious circumstances. While living in Europe in 1897, American writer MARK TWAIN discovered that at least one U. S. newspaper had reported his death. Somehow information in a letter about one of Twain's dying relatives got twisted around, the paper reported Twain dead and eventually word reached the author across the Atlantic. Twain drily wrote to a friend, "The report of my death was an exaggeration." (He is also said to have told a reporter for the Evening Sun newspaper that "Reports of my death are grossly exaggerated.") Twain died in 1910. RICHARD DAWSON was a game show giant in the 1970s, first as a panelist on the goofy Match Game and then as host of TV's Family Feud. His career ground to a halt in the mid-1980s, and by the 1990s rumors were circulating that Dawson was dead. Possibly the rumor-mongers were thinking of Dawson's successor as host of Family Feud, Ray Combs, who really did commit suicide in 1996. Like Richard Dawson, SCOTT BAIO's career went from hot to not: a teen heartthrob in the 1970s for his role as Chachi in the popular TV series Happy Days, Baio hopped through four other TV series through the 1980s and into the '90s, but as the years went by he was less frequently seen on the home screen. Maybe that's why in 1997 a rumor spread on the Internet that Baio had died. Baio reportedly resorted to leaving a cheery message on his answering machine announcing that he wasn't dead. | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 05:03am - 5848 days | #17 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Greetings from California, mr smut. I appreciate the helpful responses I got from the PU community. The weather here in California has been unusually cold and wet lately. Almost feels like German weather. Brrrrr! | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 04:51am - 5848 days | #12 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
A lot of places don't bother to reply to an email. But maybe you will be lucky. | |
|
||
| 12-17-08 09:45am - 5849 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
jd1961 and Jeffrey99, your suggestion worked. I un-installed Firefox and then re-installed it, and I can now log on to my sites with a username and password using Firefox. Many thanks. | |
|
||
| 12-17-08 08:18am - 5849 days | #10 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I have doubts Liana Shevchenko is really dead. I think it was a sick joke posted by somebody on the internet. No way for me to know for sure, because I tried a google search and found no hard evidence. | |
|
||
| 12-16-08 02:36pm - 5850 days | #12 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
mr smut, thanks for the offer of help. My Firefox problem is not just one specific site, but any site that requires username + password entry. With Firefox: I can't access Yahoo email, vote or reply at pornusers, enter the members area of paysites I belong to (Domai, Justteensite, Justteenmovie), or enter as a member other sites I am a member of. That is because my PC is blocking me from sending the username + password that is required. A firewall or similar program is blocking me. This happened after I downloaded a Firefox update last week. I worked around the problem by downloading Opera, a different browser. Luckily, I have no log on problems with Opera. I could have tried Microsoft Internet Explorer browser for a work-around, but I've heard that browser is very susceptible to computer attacks, and that is why I have used Firefox in the past. If I play around long enough, try different ideas, I think I will get my Firefox working right. In the meantime, Opera is doing a good job. I'm using Opera to post this message, because Firefox won't let me post at pornusers (You have to log on before you can post). | |
|
||
| 12-16-08 06:01am - 5850 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I was using Free Download Manager (a free program), with Firefox. But lately I can't use Firefox to log onto a site. The browser does not send my username + password over the internet. That happened last week after I upgraded Firefox to the latest version. So some program on my PC (a firewall or other anti-danger program) is blocking me from logging onto a site as a member, tho I can visit the site, such as PU, without logging on with Firefox. To get around the problem of logging on, I downloaded Opera, and now I can log on to sites with Opera. But I am still getting used to Opera, since I've only been using it a few days, and I have not been able to use Free Download Manager with Opera yet. Maybe I will work out what that problem is. But I can download from sites with Opera once I log on. I am just not using Free Download Manager to download the files. With Firefox, Free Download Manager works very simply, and it's easy to control. But with Opera, I am going to have to play around a little with Free Download Manager to see how to use it. Or maybe I will switch to one of the free download managers suggested on this thread, such as DownThemAll! Free Download Manager did what I wanted it to, reliably and simply: downloading files from sites. I would like to find the &*)_$# program that is stopping me from logging onto a site with Firefox. I've tried disabling some of the firewall and other anti-danger programs on my PC, but I am afraid to leave them disabled, and while they were temporarily disabled, I was not able to log on with Firefox. Did someone say that computers were supposed to get easier to use with time? When will that happen? After I am dead? | |
|
||
| 12-15-08 12:05pm - 5851 days | #17 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Emmanuelle movies with Sylvia Kristel: Emmanuelle (1974) .... Emmanuelle Emmanuelle 2 (1975) .... Emmanuelle Goodbye Emmanuelle (1977) .... Emmanuelle Emmanuelle IV (1984) .... Sylvia / Emmanuelle Emmanuelle au 7�me ciel (1993) . You're right, there were at least 5 different Emmanuelle movies with Sylvia Kristel, as well as a bunch of other Emmanuelle movies with other actresses playing Emmanuelle, as well as different TV series about the Emmanuelle character with other actresses (there was even one series with Emmanuelle in outer space). But the only two I saw in the movie theater were Emmanuelle I and Emmanuelle II. I've seen some of the other Emmanuelle movies on cable TV, and some episodes of a few of the different Emmanuelle TV series. But there is a definite difference in the experience when you see a movie in a nice theater, versus watching it on TV. Watching in a theater is more expensive, less convenient, but you appreciate the movie more in spite of that - unless the movie is a clunker, when you think, "What a waste of money." Emmanuelle I and Emmanuelle II were classics for me. Any other versions I saw were poor to good, but not near the quality of the first two movie versions. | |
|
||
| 12-14-08 02:55pm - 5852 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Emanuelle I and II (along with The Story of O) were French movies. My memory is not great, so I don't remember if they were dubbed into English or had English subtitles, when I first saw them. I was not talking about the many versions of Emanuelle made after that, where the story and acting did not have the higher standards of the first 2 Emanuelle movies. There were also TV series (more than one) for Emanuelle that did not compare to the original movies. Partly the value of Emanuelle and The Story of O was the shock value of having high-quality standards for porn back in the 1970s, when it was still new to have attractive actresses in porn, and a real storyline, and good production values. You could argue that back in the 1960s was when they started having those values in some of the porn/erotic movies that were released, but The Story of O and the first two Emanuelle movies (the ones with Sylvia Kristel) were classics: good story, great looking girls, softcore-type sex. The hardcore-type sex movies of those days were real junk. You might watch one of the hardcore movies at a fraternity house or at a bachelor party (No DVDs back then). | |
|
||
| 12-14-08 11:58am - 5852 days | #13 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Did you see The Story of O in the movies? There is a huge difference in quality between the theatrical release I saw and the two DVD versions I bought. The DVDs of the movie are blurry and washed out. Actually, I have not found a decent DVD copy of that movie, which was a waste of money for me, because if you don't have quality, the value of the movie goes way down. But in the 1970s, when I saw it in a movie theatre, I did not find the colors washed out or blurry. The style was sort of Penthouse versus Playboy in focus, but the colors were great and the girls were really attractive. Emanuelle I and II were sharply focused movies (very clear picture). Have not seen any DVDs of them, so don't know how they translated to DVD. | |
|
||
| 12-13-08 09:49pm - 5852 days | #10 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Jay G seems to be the PU expert on spanking sites, which you already noted. I don't know why it seems to be so difficult to make a good video, whether it's subject is spanking or anything else. But it just seems so much easier to make an attractive photoset. Because there are so many more good photosets of just about everything available. While the videos available have different qualities that can irritate each of us, whether it's jerky picture quality, poor music track, bad coloring, and lots of other qualities that detract from the video. That's why I mainly stick to photos instead of videos, as well as smaller storage requirements, etc. What about The Story of 0? A bondage film put out in the 1970s. Does that do it for you? I thought that was a classic film. Great-looking girls, interesting story, not super-hardcore, but intense enough for me. | |
|
||
| 12-13-08 09:27pm - 5852 days | #18 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I will also vote for Drooler's avatar, the one he had before the current avatar. I thought Drooler as a nickname was cool, and the lovely dog was a great-looking avatar. I never really thought about whether the dog was male or female, tho. Maybe that added to the mystery/glamour. On a side note, I really liked the avatars of a few other PU members before they changed them to reflect the Christmas season. Call me conservative, or resistant to change. | |
|
||
| 12-02-08 08:50am - 5864 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Would it be possible to have an alphabetical listing of the acronyms and their meanings, at the start/top of the Official ABRACADABRA Thread? Then follow the listing with the regular thread postings. That way, it would be easier to use the thread as a guide to acronyms. Otherwise, if you search for a specific acronym, the thread is harder to use, since you have to use a browser search function. Since you do vet each post by the members, I would think it should be simple, once you wrote the code, to do it automatically, after you select any new acronyms from the newest posts, to compile a new updated list, to be posted at the head of the thread. (Don't mean to add more work for you to do, just a suggestion.<G>) Anyway, my contribution to the ABRACADABRA Thread: AFC Average Frustrated Chump (not found on PU site membership, of course) BJ BlowJob FUG Fucking Ugly Girl. A really ugly chick. On the 1-10 scale, a 0. GND Girl Next Door Edited on Dec 02, 2008, 09:17am | |
|
||
| 11-28-08 09:05am - 5868 days | #23 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I have never asked any webmaster for a free pass to their site for the purpose of doing a review at PU or at any other porn review site or doing a review at anywhere else. Maybe I wasn't smart enough to come up with that idea. Nor do I intend to ask any porn site for a free pass for the purpose of doing a review at PU, since you consider it a serious breech. I don't mean to bug you, but if someone joins for a limited trial, that person also cannot write a review. I have not written any review based on a limited trial. But is the reasoning: that on a limited trial, the reviewer would not have enough experience with the site to give a reliable review? All the reviews I've seen appeared to be honest opinions of the writers. But I will certainly try to follow whatever the guidelines are, as long as I am a member. | |
|
||
| 11-28-08 08:14am - 5868 days | #21 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
https://www.thebestporn.com/articles_output.html?id=12 The "Guides & Tips Article" on scoring (at the URL above) states: "The 3 primary categories for a pay-site are "content" (60%), "navigation" (20%), and "cost" (20%)." But I've seen major PU members (with high points ranking who gave lots of reviews) state that TBP dropped price as a factor in scoring. And they said that price should not be a factor in the score of a PU review, and that most PU members agreed with that." Did TBP drop price as a factor in score? Cost of membership seems to me a major factor in site score. Content is the primary factor, followed by cost. and then navigation. For me personally, navigation (site ease of use) is the least important of the 3 factors. | |
|
||
| 3551-3600 of 3618 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 13 | 24 | 35 | 46 | 57 | 71 | Page 72 | 73 | Next Page > |
|
