Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: slutty (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (475)  |   Threads Started (10)

201-250 of 475 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Page 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next Page >

05-31-11  09:39pm - 4954 days #11
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by pat362:


In no particular order: Firefly, Harsh Realm, Space above and Beyond, The sarah Connor chronicles, Dollhouse, Dark Angel and let me add Fringe to the list. This last one isn't dead yet but don't be surprised if this is the year that Fox pulls the plug. I was a huge fan of Fringe for the first 2 seasons but I haven't been able to follow it this year. They keep moving it's time slot so it's nearly impossible to see the show because I never know when it's playing. They have often done that with other shows.

I think that Firefly wins the award for the best network skullfuckery of it's fans. The pilot for Firefly was not the first episode aired and they never aired the episodes in the proper sequence. What does it say to the creator and possible fans of a new show that you don't give a shit if the pilot for a potentially very lucrative show is aired first?


Yeah, I remember reading something about them screwing with the sequence, they didn't want to start the show with a two-part episode or something? I think they'll let Fringe hang around for a while just because of Abrams, and it seems closest in tone to The X-Files, which they have been trying to replace for a decade.

I thought Sarah Connor was more or less rightfully cancelled, it started out good, but as soon as that white rapper from 90210 showed up, I sort of lost interest. Dollhouse had its moments, but was pretty hit or miss, particularly the beginning of Season 2. Dushku's hot and all, but that show really showed off her lack of range. I really liked Dark Angel, not sure why the scrapped that one. As I've said before, at least Fox Sci-Fi shows are excellent at discovering new "talent". Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

05-30-11  11:38pm - 4955 days #7
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by biker:


It seems whenever someone has a complaint about a network, it is FOX. I include myself. They do have some good programming so I will watch shows I like, but does not mean I am happy with them. They will always be the network that canceled Firefly. CURSE YOU FOX!!!


Yes, screw them and their Firefly (and Arrested Development) cancelling jackassery. I don't know why Whedon doesn't just stick with the CW, they pretty much never cancel anything. If that shitball superman show lasted 8 seasons, I can only assume Firefly would have been on there for 30 years.

Although as per the original post, I think most media companies consider licensing as black and white, thus I sort of doubt Sony, EMI, or whomever would have reacted differently. Also, I suspect like with John Mayer, you may need a vagina to like Coldplay. It is a shame that 12-18 year olds (girls) are such a driving force behind the music industry. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

05-29-11  07:24pm - 4956 days #12
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Sometimes there's a fine line between objective reporting and making your financiers happy. Or maybe it's just me. Maybe I have euphemistically "special" vision, but it can't be both that it's natural and that it takes getting used to, can it?

But for video, I like 4:3 better for taking in the "whole" picture at once.


Well, even if something was originally less natural I could see it taking some time to get used to the more "natural" way.

There is so much widescreen content coming out, games, media, porn, that sooner or later you'll probably find that your aren't getting the whole picture anymore on 4:3. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

05-28-11  09:10pm - 4957 days #9
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I'm an old-fashioned (?) 4:3 man m'self. I'm happy that my 4:3 tube is still running good. It just seems to correspond to the human visual field better that the "wide" types.

Let's keep 4:3 alive!


Actually Drooler, I've seen articles stating widescreen fits more naturally with human beings' field of vision. Couldn't find any specific articles, but I seem to recall cnet having a piece on it years ago.

Personally I think it is just a matter of getting used to it, I find widescreen very useful at work as it is easier to look at documents side-by-side, and in my field of engineering documents are commonly in a 1.5:1 or so aspect ratio, so it can be easier to look at them full size on a widescreen monitor. About the only folks in my office that have 4:3 monitors these days are those with dual monitors, so they are just creating a sort of "super widescreen". Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

05-18-11  11:18pm - 4967 days #7
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
tough break rearadmiral, maybe next time you should double-bag the laptop, you never know where those tube sites have been... Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

05-18-11  10:52pm - 4967 days #342
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Khan:


I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you missed post #301 above (in this thread) with add'l info in post #305 and even post #325 where it came up again.



Ah, not sure how I missed that, must've misstyped something. Out of curiousity what criteria does it not meet to be posted? Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

05-17-11  10:06pm - 4968 days #22
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


If we're talking petite lasses, one that may be polarizing in this context is Anne Howe. Non-existent breasts for certain, but she had a bunch of moles on her body. Yet she was always one of my favorites. Anastasia Blue did some scenes where it appeared she had some skin condition. I'd still marry her.


funny, Anne Howe was the first person I thought of when I started reading this thread. Personally I always found her super hot as well, odd moles and all. Agree with you on the Jassie front as well, although some of her newer "glammed up" stuff always put me off. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

05-17-11  09:47pm - 4968 days #335
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
hey Khan, could you add wakeupnfuck, it is a sister site to woodmancastingx, so it seems legit. will probably be joining at some point soon.

thanks. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-14-11  11:15pm - 5001 days #8
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I agree with pretty much everything pat said, although I rarely keep a membership to a site longer than a few months. I will say that I have signed on for an additional month when the price was dropped when I went to cancel (X-Art dropped it to $10/month so I figured what the hell).

From a comment on your site here it sounds like your site only offers partial access providing additional acces as a bonus for "loyalty". I can't stand this practice, and it would never ever be motivation to keep me as a member, it seems dishonest unless this is well noted on your join page, which I couldn't find so perhaps you changed your policy. Also, any limitation on access that you don't tell the user about is sort of douchebaggy, so you might want to adjust that "we're not douchbags" comment on your join page if you do limit access.

Honesty is always the best policy, and any percieved trickery is only going to get you bad reviews, and certainly not going to earn repeat memberships.

I think some like to get the longer term memberships as well (6-months/1-year), and your 90-day subscription is more expensive than joining month-to-month for 3 months with the discount, so why would anyone do it?

Most sites that get members to hang around, probably do so almost entirely on honesty and decent material and regular updates.

Edit: didn't intend that to sound so harsh, slutty's having a bad day and I don't feel like fixing it to make it sound more pleasant, no offense intended. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-13-11  10:59pm - 5002 days #16
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
badandy, I never got better than 10 Mbps (total) on videobox when I was a member there recently, and that was using download managers. I used to always get fantastic downloads there in the past, particularly when downloading from different locations, but this seems to have changed.

I use download managers almost exclusively, and have rarely even come close to maxing out my connection. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-13-11  10:52pm - 5002 days #5
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I believe wicked does as well, although their HD video quality isn't the best around. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-13-11  12:51am - 5003 days #11
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
jberry, there are many sites you can use to check your bandwidth, although if it will probably vary significantly with time of day. I have found them to be pretty accurate with my supposed "max". Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-13-11  12:48am - 5003 days #451
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I suppose Pat, and I think Sixth Sense is the perfect example, I personally think it doesn't have much value in rewatching.

I guess my one problem with this strategy would be that I am sure there are many movies I have liked where the synopsis make it sound unappealing. Although I will say that I only go to the theatre if it is a movie a really want to see. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-12-11  12:10am - 5004 days #448
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
pat,

just curious, if you already know how the movie will progress doesn't that sort influence your enjoyment of it if you watched it? I usually try to avoid hearing much about a movie before I see it, as I like to be surprised. I suppose it would be okay with dramas/comedies, but thrillers would be more or less ruined wouldn't they? A movie like Memento, which was entertaining to watch once, would be ruined if you knew what was going to happen, as the entertaining part of the movie was to experience how it unfolded. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-11-11  11:53pm - 5004 days #7
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I have very rarely encountered a site that exceeds 10 Mbps, for now I would say investing in a connection higher than that strictly for porn is probably a waste of money. It is nice for services that can handle the bandwidth (Netflix, xbox-live, etc.), but not so useful for porn. Your download speed is dependent on many things aside from just the site's limitations, and I have only rarely achieved my so-called "maximum" download speed even from non-porn sites.

In response to lk2's comment, I wouldn't be surprised if some US isps started instituting quotas, if they haven't already. Also, congrats on going hardcore. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-02-11  09:16pm - 5013 days #14
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I'm with GCode, its not like this age inapproriate stuff is all that new, Britney Spears was pretty slutted up well before she was of age, I don't think 12, but still. Watch some high school or middle school cheerleading sometime, you'll be hard pressed not to feel like a pedophile at some point during some of these "routines".

I just can't stand all this autotune garbage, someone in my office was listening to that equally horrible and inane Friday song yesterday and I was about ready to pour my coffee on them. And 10 years ago I thought that surely music would never get worse than the Backstreet Boys. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

04-02-11  09:05pm - 5013 days #13
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
My main problems with networks, aside from the general confusion, are places like RK and Bangbros, where there are 20 sites and I might be interested in like 4. I rarely go back to RK, even though I like Mike's Apartment and some other because it just feels like a pain in the ass.

I do agree that it seems as though some sites, particularly euro ones use networks to hide limited content or sites that are no longer updated. If the site isn't updating, just merge it into something else.

The closest i can think of as far as a true softcore network would be Lightspeed, but I don't think that place has updated in years. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

03-18-11  08:57pm - 5028 days #3
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
His bit on No Reservations was pretty funny though... I also found him entertaining in Orgazmo. Personally I don't care so much about the looks of the "stunt cock", although Ron is a bit rotund. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

03-16-11  09:09pm - 5030 days #18
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
It seems to me that as drives get cheaper, scenes/photosets invariably increase in size, so while it is possible to get a cheap 500 GB drive these days, I don't know how many more scenes get stored compared to that 120 GB drive from 5 years ago (I doubt it's 5:1). I should look back at one of my old drives and compare the number of scenes and photosets on it to a newer one...

While I agree to some extent that scenes should be kept since space is cheap, I do like to go through from time to time and get rid of stuff I will definitely never watch again, partularly older videos with quality that is just unbearable to watch these days.

I also can't wait for solid state drives to get cheap enough to get a reasonably sized one. I'm tired of buying a new MP3 player every 3 years when the drive fails... Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

03-16-11  12:54am - 5031 days #12
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
If portability is what you are primarily interested in, forget the desktop, sorry for mentioning it.

I have found even the crappiest newer laptops handle most material reasonably well. I would just wait for a decent sale and get a "mediocre" quality laptop. As long as you aren't trying to encode video or anything yourself, I wouldn't be too concerned with the processor or video card. I paid decent money for my higher end laptop a year or so ago, and I find that generally speaking my girlfriend's laptop that was half the price works just as well for media... Although she doesn't have the backlit keyboard!

These days it seems even the shittiest of laptops handle HD well enough, although some of the lower end stuff doesn't come with HDMI. I think it is all too common for folks to buy more than they need, so don't fall into that trap. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

03-14-11  11:55pm - 5032 days #7
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I also always found the pervert line funny, and I didn't quite get the tounge-and-cheek aspect of your original post, perhaps you are right and more smileys would have helped, or perhaps I'm just not the humorous sort...

Things change fast these days, just look at those folks at NPR. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

03-14-11  11:48pm - 5032 days #6
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
hodayathink is correct, netbooks are okay for very minimal web browsing and movie watching. My girlfriend has one that is about 6-9 months old, and it is not by any means robust, and plays some SD material okay, some not so well. We have found that some compression algorithms make the video choppy, and hers can't handle HD at all. We had to dump more RAM into it just to get it to function in a non-painful fashion for even basic things.

They have very limited processing, and poor graphics capabilities, and though her's is a tad old, I can't imagine they have improved all that much. Also, while they all have VGA and some of HDMI, if you are going to have to hook it up to something else anyways (who wants to watch porn on a 10" screen?) you might want to just buy a cheap desktop.

I don't know if they still come loaded with Win7 basic or whatever it was called, but that OS is quite annoying, and typing, though you get used to it, is a bit frustrating. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

03-01-11  11:35pm - 5045 days #6
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Ed Power's site is quite disappointing, I wouldn't recommend it.

Bangbros is pretty exploitational/first timerish, I'm not really a fan of their sites, but it might fit your needs. back room casting couch is as well, and pretty much all the same ladies as exploited college girls, although the guy isn't quite as much of a douche if that's what you are looking for.. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-27-11  02:14am - 5048 days #29
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I'd recommend getting a small computer to use a media pc before getting one of these "media players" as the computer would give you more functionality for not much more money. Unless you have a really old TV that doesn't have a VGA or HDMI port. dell sells a small computer called the zino or something for $300 which has HDMI and esata, a friend of mine got one a year or so ago and it works pretty well. it is by no means a fast computer, but seems fine for videos and browsing the web.

You can also get USB-HDMI adapters if you have a laptop without an HDMI port, although I have never tried one.

Although I must say, I am still confused by this thread, if you burn a DVD as DVD-video it should play on most DVD players, I never had any problems doing this back in the day. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-27-11  01:57am - 5048 days #12
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I joined an I believe now defunct site called Ultrateen or something of the sort as my first site like 10 years ago, they used the trial-can't cancel scam to suck me into a month, which pretty much turned me off to member sites for a while, especially since I was on a limited budget in college. Like elephant the next site I joined, years later, was a Lightspeed site, I don't remember if it was Jordan Capri or Tawnee Stone, but one or the other. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-21-11  12:14am - 5054 days #32
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
misstresskent, SATA is the interface (Serial ATA), and while I agree this is an excellent interface for data transfer, it has little to nothing to do with drive reliability. I'm glad to have an eSATA external drive, although drive manufacturers still make other interfaces, I belive SCSI is still used in servers?

Personally, I think as long as the case prevents the drive from overheating, it doesn't really matter. I have a friend that bought a super cheap dual drive exernal mount a few years ago and he has had no problems with them at all, although it looks crappy. Those that have drive failures often have tainted opinions of that company (I've had Iomega failures, so I dislike them). My guess is most drive failures are a result of small manufacturing defects, wear and tear, or overheating of the drive, two of which are unavoidable. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-20-11  11:37pm - 5054 days #4
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
The DRM I have experienced is usually download the video, but you can only play it if you have an active user ID - which it will prompt you for.

There are ways to circumvent it as jberry suggested, but they usually involve playing the video and simultaneously capturing the video/audio on your computer, so this can be a pretty time consuming process. I rarely find that it is worth the effort, but I'm sure some would disagree.

I have never heard of DRM on photosets aside from site design that prevents you from right-clicking and save-as a photoset, although I haven't seen that particular strategy in years as it is easily circumvented. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-20-11  11:29pm - 5054 days #4
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Freeones is the best I have come across, but it isn't nearly as useful as EBI... Perhaps some PU should create an all babe index or something of the sort! Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-15-11  11:54pm - 5059 days #16
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I would also recommend you check for updates on all your drivers messmer. And don't use Windows to check for the drivers, go to the hardware maker's site and look for yourself. My computer crashed all the time with Win7 when I first got it, and I was certain it was the video card driver, but Windows kept telling me it was up-to-date, until I finally checked AMD's site myself to realize the driver Windows was finding was out of date as well.

Vista was an ok OS, I always found it to be a huge resource hog, and it always seemed like there must have been some kind of memory leak going on. I like Win7 fine, and I do something similar to exotics, although I used to do it more frequently, it can take a fair amount of time to install all the Windows updates that have been released since you bought your computer, I guess I'm just getting lazier. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-11-11  09:17pm - 5063 days #6
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I agree with mbaya, it seems as though most of the sites I have joined lately were $30 or so "retail", aside from the DVD sites, this seems to have been more or less the going rate for a while... Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-09-11  11:05pm - 5065 days #422
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I think being attached to a popcorn flick has a bit more risk associated with it than just doing it for money. Probably not so much if the film does well, but there are risks. While sequels might seem like easy money, they can damage careers - look at Batman and Robin (O'Donnell and Silverstone haven't done too great since), of course that was easily one of the shittiest films of the 90s, and they aren't exactly of the caliber of McDormand, but it certainly didn't do their careers any favors.

Please no more on the Beiber front, or Glee, ugh... Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-08-11  08:59pm - 5066 days #9
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I have never been able to get DTA to do anything but the thumbs either, unless the picture is being displayed. I messed around with a few of the image grabbers, but none of them worked too well either... Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-08-11  08:46pm - 5066 days #419
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Perhaps goofy was poor word choice, off-beat may have been a bit better. Either way, I found the characters very interesting, especially Steinfeld and Bridges. I could see how some might find the dialogue a bit phony, but I thought it added nice depth to the characters. The dialogue in many of the coens' films could strike some as phony, Miller's Crossing, O Brother, Hudsucker, even Fargo and Raising Arizona to some extent. The dialogue style is probably one of the more consistent aspects of their films, and I thought it worked well here.

I saw a preview for the new Transformers movie last weekend at the theater, and holy crap does that look beyond over-the-top. Sort of surprised they got McDormand to do it, and that Turturro needs cash that bad... Also, surprised Speilberg would want his name attached to this film, even just as a producer. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-08-11  03:07pm - 5066 days #28
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
He is pretty bad TheSquirrel, maybe not the worst I've seen, but quite irritating. I also like this niche, it is unfortunate that so many sites in this niche have such irritating male talent. Especially when this genre is one where it is almost impossible to ignore them. I'd recommend the casting couch place first, if you can handle that guy and really like the ladies, exploited college girls might be something you'd enjoy. Just keep in mind that the guy at exploited college girls is much worse/abusive/annoying. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-08-11  12:25am - 5067 days #26
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I second pat on avoid exploited college girls, it has some decently attractive models, and I don't mind the self-shot amateur style, but the guy is just such a fucking douche, after revisiting their material I keep thinking I should go back to my review and drop the score... if you like the models on that site and the casting couch style, most are on their other site, and that guy isn't nearly as bad. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-08-11  12:09am - 5067 days #416
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I couldn't disagree with you more strongly on this lk2, I'm not sure what you were expecting from a coen/western, but a fast pace would not be something to expect, and of course it was character based - that's the coens. I don't think it is a perfect film, but what exactly does one want from such a film, dozens of gunfights, a bunch of horseback riding chases? If you don't like goofy dramas, I would just avoid the coens, because that is all you will ever get.

I haven't seen many movies this year, but this was easily one of the best I have seen, and everyone we saw it with agreed. As far as most Eastwood westerns, his most critically acclaimed was probably Unforgiven, which was by no means a fast-paced movie. Did you enjoy Unforgiven?

Critically acclaimed movies are almost always character driven dramas, not action driven, because these are the films that require talented actors and filmmakers. Just because it isn't a popcorn flick doesn't mean it isn't a good film. I always wonder exactly what film do folks think should have been nominated for best picture this year?

As far as Downey's role, I agree it is a bit goofy to nominate him for that, but he did play the part well, and his character added a lot to the film.

TF 2 was terrible, I really wanted to shoot myself in the head 20 minutes into it, Megan Fox is pretty much talentless and gets by on her looks, and I'm sure pissing off people that make movies where looks count doesn't really help her career. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-06-11  12:28am - 5069 days #10
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Interesting thoughts, although I don't really see the erosion of free speech in non-internet media. One could argue that even though there are a large number of media conglomerates these days, this isn't really all that different from the past, aside from the fact that there aren't as many independent newspapers anymore.

Censorship has existed in main stream media for a long time, if anything I would say that we live in a much less censored society these days then we did even 20 years ago. While there may be a lot of self censorship within corporations, I don't really think the government is stepping in all that often. Certainly the FCC has gone batshit over dumb crap like Jackson's tit and Howard Stern, but this isn't really any different than the past, I'm sure if Stern had tried some of that stuff in the 50's he would have been thrown in prison.

Perhaps I'm just less paranoid than some, but I don't really think the government cares much about the day to day crap normal people do or say. Society is much more permissive of many things these days, and I can't see them trying to induce some type of censorship without significant blowback. Governments having to approve ISPs is a perfectly reasonable thing, and there are hundreds of enterprises that need government oversight/approval (local and federal), does that mean the government is trying to "control" those companies? Its not censorship until the government shuts something down for content it doesn't approve of, this is beyond the level of ISPs, that would be regulating individual users.

Also, the people that put most politicians in office could give a rat's ass about the movie/music/porn industries. Until an oil company buys Time Warner or something, I wouldn't worry about it. In the 50 US companies by revenue Time Warner was the only one I saw at number 49 with $47B in revenue, ExxonMobil had almost that much in profit... Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

02-04-11  11:14pm - 5070 days #7
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
According to a recent article, the internet "kill switch" doesn't exist, and the current legislation they are trying to pass doesn't give the president this power.

http://www.sunjournal.com/state/story/980334

It wasn't that long ago that killing the net would be pretty easy just by shutting down MAE West or part of MAE Eest, but at this stage so much fiber has been run from so many different ISPs to so many other ISPs that it would be pretty difficult to completely shut it down, and I don't really see many ISPs cooperating with such a possibily. Shutting down the public exchanges would slow everything down, but I don't know that it would kill the net anymore.

Not to say anything good would come from the Collins legislation, I don't really understand why they are trying to pass it and what it really accomplishes.

I'm not sure what TheSquirrel means by free internet... I don't think any Western nation could get away with what Mubarak did, even if it was for public safety or some such bullshit.

I think net neutrality is a far far bigger deal than this bill is, especially for porn users. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-31-11  01:03am - 5075 days #32
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by mistresskent:


The original comment was about $1 per scene.. I already sell individual clips and I don't do bad from it.

$1 to me with the current economic state would most definitely shut me down,

15% goes to the CCP and 30% goes to the console provider.

My original argument was about the costs of porn being constantly driven down my customer demands and the bigger companies adhering to them.

I was only highlighting the fact that the cost per MB downloaded by a customer for the little guys is FAR FAR more expensive than those with huge servers etc.


Just curious mistresskent, but given the data you have provided wouldn't $1 per scene perhaps be more profitable for your site? I assume the 15% is the same regardless of charge, so for examples sake: say the average user downloads 20 scenes over the course of their one month membership, then they are only averaging $.50 or so a scene with the PU discount. The obvious downside to this I suppose would be if you have some scenes that are super popular that people join for, but if all your content is equally good it would seem as though you'd be better off charging per scene.

If you charge per scene you have a relatively known server cost, whereas if you offer full access for a price users could download 2 scenes or 20. What is the average number of scene downloads per month for your users, if it is high it would seem this model would work for you?

I would think the only sites that would be against this model would be those that are aware that they only have a few scenes worth downloading, in which case they are misleading the customer (I am not trying to say that is what your site is, sorry if it sounds that way). I understand production costs are high, but I don't think that excludes this business model for small sites. Perhaps I am misunderstanding some costs... Not trying to be combative, just curious. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-31-11  12:09am - 5075 days #18
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I'm also a member of facebook, although I only login about once a month... I'm not one who understands the endless annoying anecdotes and status updates, why must we know that you are going out to walk the dog, or really love Dr. Pepper?

I don't think privacy there is any more of a concern than it is anywhere else on the internet. You can sign up with just your email address, and are not required to give any other information except your name and b-day(which could be fake).

I don't see how they will be a profitable enterprise without using more targeted ads like google does with gmail and search, but this is nothing really new. I'm not a big fan of this type of privacy "violation", but this is pretty much the state of the internet these days. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-23-11  11:02pm - 5082 days #15
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Sorry man, although it was an entertaining game - even with no rooting interest. I always like seeing the safety dance. The Jets must have made some good adjustments at halftime, or perhaps the Steelers just thought they would roll, but good game nonetheless.

At least it had some decent playcalling, the bears/packers game had some of the pussiest playcalling I've seen in a while. Punting from the 33 or whatever? Shit, grow a pair. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-15-11  11:42pm - 5090 days #17
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I'm not aware of a way in which you can schedule downloads with DTA, but perhaps its possible.

on most sites where i couldn't use "save link with DTA" it was possible to click on the link and then use the option to download with DTA.

assuming it is a static link and you want to do the downloads when going to bed, you could probably just pause the download until the appropriate time. however non-static links are the bane of download managers in general. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-14-11  11:00pm - 5091 days #18
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
i've never really noticed too much of a significant difference between the two on my television, otoh. i'm not aware of any US broadcasts in 1080p, and i think most HD content available via cable/sat looks pretty damn good (although not quite as good as a blu-ray). my TV is only 46" though, I'm sure a larger TV would illuminate the differences more.

at a certain point the quality of your TV becomes more significant as well. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-14-11  10:23pm - 5091 days #14
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Just curious, which sites didn't let you use DTA, I haven't come across any lately where it didn't work.

I also like DTA and use it regularly, I'm not a fan of its file naming system, other than that it is a pretty good little program. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-13-11  11:10pm - 5092 days #4
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I sort of doubt any more ladies will leave than usually leave in a given year. In fact with the down economy and limited options more might stay.

I don't recall much of interest happening in porn in 2010, other than perhaps HD becoming more prevelent, the stagliano thing, and some performers/producers dying. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-13-11  10:49pm - 5092 days #10
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Do you mean in porn or mainstream film? "Talkies" came into Hollywood in the late 1020s and early '30s and indeed many actors and actresses didn't make the transition (though they still seem to hire on looks alone, whereas acting ability takes second or third priority).


They had movies in the 1020s! Sorry, couldn't resist

I've hooked up my TV via HDMI on my laptop to play downloaded HD content and it is pretty good, although personally I find it a bit overrated - especailly given so many scenes have poor camerawork and lighting (and the HUGE file sizes). My TV does a decent enough job up-scaling SD content that I rarely keep the huge HD files unless it is an excellent scene.

Never bought any Blu-Ray porn DVDs, but if I were you I'd stick to purchasing from companies with decent production budgets. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-09-11  12:17am - 5097 days #5
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Perhaps a webmaster shouldn't vote in the User Polls, but I am sure they would be welcome to reply to the Poll Question?

I am sure the Webmasters here and at other forums have to be very careful dealing with site owners, and I'm sure the forum rules are to prevent site owners from forum into a mess of self-promotion. While I'm sure a lot of site owners would post topics that were appropriate, many I'm sure would be tempted to use it for promotion. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-09-11  12:12am - 5097 days #5
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
Its not like the movies take a long time to shoot - they aren't filming Pirates of the Carribean where she'd have to be available for months. I doubt typical porn shoots last longer than a day. Porn stars have been stripping on the side probably for as long as there has been porn. I'm just guessing, but I imagine many started out as strippers/escorts anyway.

I enjoyed how she said Hollywood had conquered piracy, really? When did that happen, it must have been quite recently. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-05-11  09:50pm - 5100 days #2
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
I'd be pretty wary of downloading any codec from a porn site. I've never heard of a site using a site specific codec for playing their videos, and if that were the case I wouldn't be a member there. Your always better off downloading software from a reliable source, not to offend the porn site operators out there but I don't really consider them that reliable. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

01-05-11  09:46pm - 5100 days #2
slutty (0)
Active User

Posts: 475
Registered: Mar 02, '09
Location: Pennsylvania
good luck messmer, Nubiles is certainly as good a place as any of the shaved teenies (although don't expect too many cotton knickers, or unfortunately decent lingerie). Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars.
Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited.

201-250 of 475 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Page 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.