|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
BubbaGump (0)
|
| 101-109 of 109 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | Page 3 |
| 01-11-12 10:53am - 4829 days | #46 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User  Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Nipples are evil. | |
|
||
| 01-11-12 10:34am - 4829 days | #44 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Yeah. I would point out that I am not judging here. What consenting adults enjoy during sex is their affair. However, the feds are going to go after the folks who push the envelope too far when it comes to selling depictions. That' s just the reality. They aren't going to go after the avg Joe producer. They will look for the easy prey where even many liberal minded folks would find it a bit extreme. Case in point-max hardcore. The guy had a sign on his back that read, 'come and charge me'. I am surprised he lasted as long as he did. Stuff like that harms the industry imo. The industry should distance itself from the extreme players. This isn't a noble pursuit of free speech. This is an industry that can't afford the consequences of pushing the envelope too far. There are realities that cannot be ignored. One of these realities is that there are many conservative politicians who wield legislative power. Such individuals would actually love to see more work like max hardcore because they get to parade such ilk in front of the public and offer such individuals up as 'proof' that porn is vile, morally bankrupt, and degrading to women-and that those of us who enjoy erotica are perverted and depraved misogynysts with violent tendencies. | |
|
||
| 01-10-12 05:19pm - 4830 days | #40 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
The guys too. There are scenese where the guy spit in the girl's mouth. To me that is not only nasty it totally turns me off to any erotic thoughts. It turns me off to the studio and producers as well. I certainly am not a prude here or I wouldn't be on a porn forum asking advice on good erotic content. However, when I see those types of scenes or ones where the model gets gagged and such, the though that really enters my mind is that this only fuels the conservative critics who say porn is demenaing and degrading and all that usual criticism. I am not judging anyone's intent here. I am just saying it's like handing out ammo and can do more harm than good to the industry IMO. Might as well put a bullseye on your back for any critic of the industry looking to legislate it--and there are plenty of them who would like to. | |
|
||
| 01-10-12 04:29pm - 4830 days | #38 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Interesting discussion. I only visited one porn message board in the past and it was just a lot of babble. I think terms like explicit and erotic are loaded terms that really don't have any meaning outside of a context. They are relative to the viewer. In some conservative Arab nations, eye makeup would be considered erotic. A woman wearing khaki shorts would be considered explicit--too explicit. I remember back when there were the Porn obscenity trials and Larry Flynt was on trial. Supreme Court judges were tasked with defining the word obscene, as one needed such a defintion before one could define a law related to obscenity. They couldn't. As one judge put it, "I can't define it but I know it when I see it." They realized that it is a loaded term that depends on the viewer and thats why they left it up to communities to define their own standards. Its difficult to legislate without defining something. Most people have their own personal ideals of what is expliit or erotic. That's as far as you can take it. Everyone knows it for themselves when they see it, but it is entirely a personal judgement call based on ones own tastes and preferences in things sexual. I aggree with others who state there is a generational gap when it comes to popular erotic interests. You need to consider the times. Young folks can't understand why a movie like Emanuelle evoked erotic feelings because they are accustomed to today's media. Back in the early 80's when I was entering college, seeing a bare boob flash on the TV screen while watching a latenight cable softcore featur was enough to get the hormones surging. Catching a glimpse of pubes was even more titilating. This was on TV ! It was unheard of and when cable came out in the early 80's-- they started featuring such latenight erotic on HBO. Today, porn is all over and network TV is pushing new barriers that were unheard of in the 80's. The younger 20-somethings today would see a flash of a bare boob as non eventful. Back then it created controversy and drove up the price of kleenex stock. Also, back in the 80's, if you wanted to view hardcore porn or nude magazines outside of Playboy, you either mailed out for it or visitied an adult bookstore(often a very seedy place.) Enter today's age of high-volume porn consumption on the net. The good part is there is lots of variety to satisfy varying interests. The bad part is quality suffers in a lot of cases because business demands dictate that site owners need to churn and burn content to keep subscribers interested and paying so they stick around. There is no time to take a couple months to produce an erotic production. It seems to be a high volume business now. Also, things like network storage cost money. Scenes likely to get axed are the less explicit feeds that are the meat and potatoes. No slow stripping, foreplay, or any of that stuff many 40-something guys like me enjoy. Very little is left to the imagination. Time(and disk space) is money. So, the script is proceed directly to go. Wham, Bam, Thank You Mam. Anyways, that's my analysis. I think this is why I find still photography more erotic and prefer this medium over video most of the time. A camera in the hands of a good photographer can ellicit more erotic feelings in me than closeups of an ungainly Pepsi-can-width dick plowing in and out of a shaved vaginal orifice. Stills allow one to take in subtle details. Imagination flows freely and you are not confined to a script. It is easier to imagine the beauty in the image is there with you than it is when trying to follow the shaky hands of the videographer as he jitters the camera around the action. So, to me, erotic images are those where I can let my imagination run wild. I have enjoyed photography for years and can appreciate the good work when its available. IMO the good photographers are the ones who can bring the imagination to the forefront. Sometimes, this means not baring it all with legs spread eagle. A slow undressing or flash of skin can be enough. Models don't always need to be fully nude. I enjoy the creative angles and various perspectives--the ones not limited to models reclining or sitting in a chair. For me, its all in the presentation. If you just want to see spread-eagle naked bodies and nothing else, you are missing out.  Things that turn me off and are too explicit for my tastes are slapping, spitting--that kind of stuff. Or, if the model looks drugged up I just can't find it appealing. I am not judging here. Just sharing my own preferences. Things I like are natural bodies with voluptuous figures. I also enjoy a natural look. Whatever happened to pubic hair anyways??? Edited on Jan 10, 2012, 04:35pm | |
|
||
| 01-09-12 03:33pm - 4831 days | #12 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Yes, thank you capn for the reccomendations. I appreciate the help. Well, the models on the first few links are abit too thin and such for my erotic tastes. I like less the Playboy model type and more full hips and shapely thighs, larger breasts, etc. I am not talking overweight as in large BBW here. More like voluptuous with curves. I like more filled-out, hourglass figures. The link the fellow shared on Danica Collins pretty much sums up my fantasy erotic interests. I wish there was a site featuring models with similar builds and such. I guess I must be a niche market as this doesn't seem to be well-represented. Surely others have the same interest but it must not be a large interest. I used to be a subscriber to Score magazine publications and have visted their sites. I just don't like their style of photography as opposed to others, especially digitally. The presentation strikes me as heavily air-brushed and plastic. Their compositions also seem the same and very static. No offense to them. In days past, my viewing of girly mags was limited to things like Juggs, Gent, Score Volutuous etc...I still have an old collection of Gent mags from the 80's and 90's. That pretty much sums up my erotic interests. I always liked the softcore stuff and really just never got into the hardcore video scene in most cases, although I do enjoy some breast flicks. All of the glamour sites today, with few exceptions like the Danica site shared, seem to be centered around the thin and petite 19 year old types. Thin is in all around--even the MILF publications. I am certainly not stating I don't find thin models attractive. I just wish more models would put down the salad forks and start eating some cornbread and catfish ! Edited on Jan 09, 2012, 03:36pm | |
|
||
| 01-09-12 02:28pm - 4831 days | #10 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Thanks for the advice. I looked at the site. Danica Collins looks very sexy and classy.I wish there weas variety at the site, however. I would find it hard to spend a monthly fee to only see photos of one model. | |
|
||
| 01-08-12 06:03pm - 4832 days | #7 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Thanks for the info. I wish the site like 1by-day had models with a little more full figures asnd boobs. A site like that would be ideal for what I am looking for. | |
|
||
| 01-08-12 05:09pm - 4832 days | #4 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Hello. Thank you for the reply. I like Softcore over Hardcore but either will do as long as the content is what is adevrised. Some producers advertise a movie about big boobed women and they show everything but the boobs ! I get to see some guys hairy crak moving back and forth or closeups of the models back or something. Whats up with that? If I view a movie advertising large chested women, I would expect to see boobs--lots of them ! Well, in the past whenever I have browsed any porn online, I have gravitated towards the photo galleries. Videos are OK but I find them too much work, if that makes any sense. I hate downloading them, they take up too much space and most of the movies do nothing for me and there are only usually only a small number of segments I find enjoyable. I think I just find it too distracting. Camera angles are usually never to my liking and the scenes I do like dont last long enough or something. With photo gallelries with alrge content, I always find something to my taste and dont get distracted by jiggling cameras or such. Considering the amount of money sites charge, I feel like I am not getting my moneys worth when I only go for the galleries. Its too bad the sites dont all allow content by type, where if you want only photos, you pay for the photo sections only etc.. I am looking for sites that have really good , high resolution, quality photo content--ones I can trust that I wont get ripped off in this business. I know I will have to pay full price even though most videos will go wasted on me. When I had a membership at realitykings I spent most of my times viewing the sites DangerousCurves,The Boob site, and the massiverears I like those large, floppy boobs, large nipples, and meaty rears. Too bad Realitykings didnt have high-res photo content. Edited on Jan 08, 2012, 05:16pm | |
|
||
| 01-08-12 02:13pm - 4832 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
This is my first post here. I thought I would ask a question. First, just a complaint about porn in general. I don't really get into videos as much as I do still photography. Videos to me are all the same. Everything is the same. There is very little creativity today and everyone is churning them out as fast as they make them and leaving quality behind. Or perhaps maybe its just I have not been looking at the right studios. They take these beautiful women and just run around adhoc with a camera and show closeups of some guys wiener plowing in and out of the models snatch. Or they show the wierd angles or the guy gets in thw way or starts yapping etc. Anyways, end of rant. I view porn maybe once or twice a week, especially when I am on the road on business. My erotic interest include breasts and natural figures on women, etc up to BBW size. My erotic interests are more along the lines of shapely and meaty rears and breasts. I was never into the basketball and baseball shaped implants and prefer the natural look. I guess thats why never really cared for Playboy/Penthouse etc as the models are just too thin. Or maybe its just my perception. As this is a fantasy, I have trouble getting into it as when I look at the models and the thought that these runway models just slipped into my bed, the thought I have is I aint buying it.  Anyways, does anyone have any suggestions or opinions for sites with high-resolution photos of the niche I am speaking of--Breasts, Buns, and Natural women? I am looking for quality photos and such. I was a member of a site a while ago--RealityKings. Some of the models were what I was looking for but the photos are too small and it looks like nobody put a whole lot of thought into it. Thank You. | |
|
||
| 101-109 of 109 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | Page 3 |
|
