Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: jd1961 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (296)  |   Threads Started (18)

101-150 of 296 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 Page 3 4 5 6 Next Page >

07-07-09  01:31am - 5647 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Just another stunt cock, does it matter who it is?
There is no such creature as a male porn "star".
Only the females matter.

07-06-09  12:14am - 5648 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Not to burst anyone's 4th of July holiday bubble, but it appears that Carradine didn't kill himself, at least according to this recent New York Times brief.


That's even worse.

06-26-09  03:11am - 5658 days #21
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by SueAnn:


Hi everyone,

Sorry to burst the apocalyptic bubble, but abbywinters.com isn't going anywhere...

Police have to respond to any and all complaints and although I myself wasn't there (I nicked up to the snow), I was told the "coppers" were polite and actually good humoured. They didn't take any hardware and no charges have been laid.

We have incredibly thorough policies for recording ID and model details to ensure they're overage and we proudly sponsor ASACP.

Apart from that, it's business as usual, the site will be radically updated towards the end of the year (loads of cool features, stay tuned!) and I'm here to help answer any questions and generally be a forum flirt :)

Hope that helps,
Sue-ann


Thanks for posting in this thread, as you can see a lot of people are concerned.

Your servers are in Texas. I was wondering why they aren't located in Australia, where all the content is produced. Is there a worry there?

06-25-09  11:35pm - 5658 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


Stupid acts like swinging your infant child over a balcony would've had your child taken away from you by the authorities.


I forgot about that. Edited on Jun 26, 2009, 03:18am

06-25-09  11:31pm - 5658 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:



I never bought the Farrah poster, but all I had to do was go out to shopping areas and it was everywhere, so I could gawk on the cheap. It was very sexy and even provocative for the time.




It's funny what a big deal that poster was---but it really was. For a teenage boy it was :)

http://cm1.theinsider.com/media/0/2/97/a...0.0.0x0.304x423.jpeg Edited on Jun 25, 2009, 11:37pm

06-25-09  07:01pm - 5658 days #17
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


WAUW - it's just nostalgic - had forgotten about this classic player - and did not know it still existed - remember having it, using it and being very fond of it at former PCs...
Am testing it right now - and it seems just GREAT.

THANKS, JD!!!!


That's the great thing about software---it doesn't rust!

06-25-09  06:48pm - 5658 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Guys my age will fondly remember the Farrah craze and recall to mind that famous line from Steve Martin:

"Farrah Fawcett-Majors has never called me once. And after all the time I've spent holding up her poster with one hand" !

06-25-09  12:31pm - 5659 days #15
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


When we got our current computer, I decided to go for a new media player and started using VLC, and only use it now. My biggest problem with Windows Media Player now is the damn thing switches my "file associations" so it is taking over my mp3s and movies.




Click "Start">"Default Programs" to take care of that.
Or right click a file and click "open with" and click "choose default program" and check "Always Use..."

06-25-09  12:29pm - 5659 days #14
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Does that give you a warm and fuzzy feeling, that we are all connected to Bill Gates? Sort of like the giant E.T. in the sky, only closer to home. Lol.


I try not to think about it. I wish I had my old XP back, but I guess it's too late!

06-25-09  12:18pm - 5659 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


What does that mean, exactly. (since I'm far from being an expert here)
BTW: Been using the new setup with WMP for some hours now - The quality is just great, but it seems like it's using more time to get started - than both VLC and Crystal Player - is that the "calling home"-deal?


http://ccs.frogwrite.co.nz/spyware.htm

It's not your imagination, it is a slow loader.

Here's a reputable place to download the classic player:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/guliverkli/

As always, scan before you install. Edited on Jun 25, 2009, 12:24pm

06-25-09  02:11am - 5659 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


It's like old habits - and something to do with the size of frame - (for smaller preview - before going fullscreen).

BUT - just used some time to really check out the WMP - and found it: Skin mode - and it looks much better (concerning frame). Think I'll try and see, if I can get used to this player instead -- so, well - you learn something new all the time...


It also calls home to Microsoft!

06-24-09  10:37pm - 5659 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
From what I understand, the bust of AW is just the tip of the iceberg down under.
Australia seems to be leading the charge toward a fully regulated and censored internet, and are probably using AW in that effort. One day the internet will be fully regulated, such as television and radio are. This is a fact of life. People will always exclaim, "no, the internet will always be open". Why? Can you set up your own TV station? You'll be raided as soon as the FCC traces your signal. Your own radio station. Nope. Why will the internet be different.
They will use porn, fueled by child porn hysteria, as the excuse. As it is now, Australia has a SECRET censored site list. Secret.

Sometimes I do wonder if the mega explosion of online porn is no accident. Edited on Jun 24, 2009, 10:42pm

06-24-09  10:19pm - 5659 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by GCode:


I am with jd1961 on this and with any other player besides windows media player in general. I really have never had any problems using windows media player and I am just wondering what makes this and any other player better? Maybe I'm just in the dark and I would love to know if something is extremely better than windows media player when viewing videos?


I use WMP Classic myself, but I'm always open to something else. I used to like Divx, but not anymore. I only use VLC if I must.

06-24-09  09:24pm - 5659 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


Anybody here use Crystal Player (free version)?

Have used this excellent player for years - and using it more than anyother (and,ok - along with VLC)

But now Crystal Player seem to have grown tired of this freebee-deal - so they now have messages running over the screen while playing a video.
Is there a way around this - og is it finally a matter of payment? - after so long time...


http://forum.oldversion.com/requests/212...-crystal-player.html

Oldversion is reliable, but scan before you install.
I'm curious---what's the big deal about Crystal Player?

06-20-09  09:05pm - 5663 days #24
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by james4096:


I googled it quickly and came up with this la times article
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-porn-hiv12-2009jun12,0,3569962.story

It was 16 cases of HIV. I don't think they can release the names, but they may get out.


16?!!

Wow. That's what you get for not hiring straight guys.

06-19-09  01:41pm - 5665 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


(Edited Post) Spam? We'll see if the poster comes back here or not.


He does criticize, and it's a good valid criticism.

06-08-09  06:25pm - 5675 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by james4096:


Sad news. I wish they would have omitted the naked part. Now the speculation that it was an accidental death due to autoerotic asphyxiation will loom forever. Even if it was, that's we shouldn't hear about that.


Oh man, I saw the photo that's exactly what it was. He was wearing fishnet stockings and a wig and his his genitals were tied up. Nasty way to die.
Google is quickly removing the photos as the Carradine family vows to sue anyone who posts his death photo. Edited on Jun 08, 2009, 06:34pm

06-05-09  12:47am - 5679 days #14
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


The Supreme Court ruling saying that cartoons aren't porn dates back to 2002. The ruling in that case was in regards to a 1996 federal law against animated child porn. The law currently being abused dates from 2003 and was passed, in part, by Congress to correct supposed deficiencies with the 1996 law the Supreme Ct. whacked down. No definitive word yet on what the outer reaches of this law are.


I gave you that link from 2007. When the Supreme Court rules on something, it's the final word. There is no such thing as virtual "child porn".

"They're talking about "virtual child porn," the computer depiction of adults having sex with children. It has found a home at places like the popular Second Life game, which is available online.

Many child advocates see it as the most troubling manifestation of child sex abuse that's come along in years.

And they blame a 2002 court ruling that tossed out a law that made it illegal."

The court ruled that any law that forbids "virtual child porn" is an infringement upon the 1st amendment. That makes any attempt to make that a law null and void. In other words, it's not possible to make that law. Edited on Jun 05, 2009, 12:54am

06-04-09  08:33pm - 5679 days #12
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


In regards to JD1961's comment about the Sup. Ct. saying drawings aren't porn, I don't know but I don't think that is the case since there have been porn other porn convictions for explicit writings and other drawings. I know that the 2003 Protect Act is still in business so the final word from on high is still unsettled in my book.




The Supreme Court struck it down, and rightfully so. Imagine going to prison for possessing a cartoon!

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/04/16/s....virtual.child.porn/

BTW, the Court opined that under that ridiculous law, Romeo And Juliet would be considered "Child Porn" and anyone possessing it would be sent to a federal prison!

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=3159871&page=1 Edited on Jun 04, 2009, 08:44pm

06-04-09  08:25pm - 5679 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Grasshopper is dead????

06-04-09  01:29am - 5680 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
The US Supreme Court ruled that drawn images can not constitute porn, so I'm not sure what you're referring to.

05-28-09  02:37pm - 5687 days #25
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by mbaya:


I just received this email from a webmaster in response to my asking why they discontinued downloads and are streaming only.
"Thank you for your email. We are aware that we are losing sales by not having a download option. We know that our product is not being blasted all over the tube sites on the internet for free either. You are correct that there is still the ability to steal our content&#65533;.but the fact is that its too much work for too little reward. It will not be long before every site has moved to protect their content as we have done. Every site will be flash only, and the content will not be downloadable. Since you are familiar with many other sites it may seem like it is too big of a task, but its going to happen. We talk to everyone in our industry, and everyone is making this move."
I am curious as to everyone's reaction to this statement.


He's a liar, plain and simple. These sites are way overpriced, and they know it. I was reading a webmaster forum last year when one of them admitted it---cost of bandwidth way down, but their price going up and he admitted that he understood why people were avoiding the paysites and using the free tube sites.
So who is it?

05-21-09  12:11am - 5694 days #19
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


Thanks GCode, I actually have found some information on the file I was talking about. From what I can see, I have three Eve Angel Japanese videos. All three are under the publisher name Momotaro.




I didn't know she did some JAV?!
I'd like to see that.
Back in the olden days, Traci Lords did a video in Japan.

05-21-09  12:06am - 5694 days #18
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I can watch a whole JAV and enjoy it, non sex scenes included. If I do that with an American porn, my monitor is in danger of being smashed into a million pieces.

05-21-09  12:04am - 5694 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by bengun:


hm...got no luck with ALLINTERNAL !

Well, I wrote to the support team on ALLINTERNAL several times (3-4 times), because i would like to know the reason(s) why european members have to pay much more as US-members have to.
I asked friendly for a solution / statement (IF there is a really comprehensive reason, i would even pay the extra amount), but I got NO reply at all. Nothing!!

This is a simple proof to me that there IS NO reason but unashamed rip-off!

I`am truly dissapointed. NEVER EVER would I waste my money to a company with such a bad attitude.

It is just annoying!
But o.k....if they don`t want my money, i`ll go for another site. There are more than enough fair trading sites with very nice content out there. Who need`s allinternal?

just my 5 cent`s
BEN


Why don't you leave a comment at the allinternal page here? At the very least it would serve as a visible warning.

05-20-09  11:57pm - 5694 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by pat362:



4-Being Canadian means that I did not have to wait until I was 21 to legally start drinking. I sometime wish that Americans would alter that law.


I live near the border, and when the drinking age was raised to 21, everyone just drove across the bridge...and enjoyed the Canadian Ballet as well!

05-20-09  12:47am - 5695 days #19
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I think you can buy the stream off nhlDOTcom

04-03-09  06:20am - 5742 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


It rather irks me whenever politicians feel they need to start dictating what our colleges and universities cannot teach. While I'm not surprised that there was an outcry over such an event, I am saddened that the legislators were so willing to try to essentially pass a censorship law.




These schools receive public funding, so while I find politicians distasteful myself, it is their responsibility to account for where their constituents money is being spent.

04-03-09  06:16am - 5742 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by turboshaft:




My experience in school has led me to believe that for all the tolerance and free speech talk


An American college campus is the last place you'll find these ideals...still, I have to admit that I find it somewhat odd that someone would think of screening a porno on campus as if it were some sort of legitimate film. Especially from that company!

04-03-09  06:09am - 5742 days #23
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Brazzers is a good site, but oh my! Every time I check in there I feel like I'm in a 1990's time machine. Big water balloons with long ugly scars---freakish stuff.

03-26-09  10:57pm - 5749 days #19
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Khan:


You can sometimes avoid your password being guessed (hacked) by others by selecting a more cryptic password.


That will help for guessing, but won't help a bit for hacking.

03-26-09  10:55pm - 5749 days #18
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Don't worry about being hacked, some sites seem to have this problem.


All of them are hacked into daily. They should know this by now and not try to blame the paying customer.

I would write the billing company and demand a full refund.

03-20-09  10:26pm - 5755 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
My browser crashed when I clicked into this site.

03-20-09  10:23pm - 5755 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:




AFTER that they have given me a "longtime" free acces to the site.




I trust you but here's the problem:

Now that this is known, maybe I'll give them a 99 in hopes of getting free access also!

03-14-09  07:45pm - 5761 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
This kind of shilling always backfires, as you can see by the responses over there. They usually understand their mistake quickly.

03-14-09  07:33pm - 5761 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


What about newsgroups - what about the Usenet.
Once I reviewed Easynews and Kahn deleted the review and stated that it is: Theft?
Is it?
Is the Usenet not the freedom of the net?
Even if pratically all the stuff on the "binaries" is bottomline a matter of sharing - is that theft? I'm not sure..

The reasons for this thread are two:

1) Theft or not?

2) The all-time most popular usenet-provider, Easynews is in trouble:
http://www.newsgroupreviews.com/easynews-review.html

...so does this PU-site have the frankness to discuss usenet or what?

After all - the usenet contains maybe the most vast amount of porn...


Newsgroups? Do people still use those? I know google has all the old newgroups archived, but you don't need a newsreader.

All the free porn a person can possible want is contained on google search.

03-01-09  07:27pm - 5774 days #16
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Political threads=bad idea

02-25-09  08:26am - 5779 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Yes, porn on a cell phone makes about much sense as coming home from a hard day's work and collapsing face-first on the Ottoman foot stool.


Couldn't have phrased that better!

I tried surfing the web on my cell once, just isn't handy.

02-25-09  08:23am - 5779 days #19
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I got one of those "blank check" negative marks when I first joined, and it bothered me because I had no idea why someone did that. So thanks for removing it!

02-25-09  08:20am - 5779 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I know I must be getting old, because I no longer find it very crucial to see genital penetration at all times, I'm more interested in the eroticism. I guess that's why I have no problem with the JAV mosaic, as some people do.

02-25-09  08:16am - 5779 days #16
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I agree with the comments. Yes I think my score is low, but only using PU members marking, not my own criteria, which I would argue follows PU's and TBP's original criteria, but not the real way sites are marked. So many here and on TBP, seem to mark so abnormally high


Speaking for myself, I'm very picky in the sites I join, and only join after a lot of research. So I think my scores appear higher because of that. I'm pretty sure I'm going to like a site before I join it, although it doesn't always work out that way.

02-25-09  07:21am - 5779 days #14
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
When you join a site, you should do so through the links in TBP, they deserve our support.

I've been saved from many a bad site because of reviews and comments here. And I can get all the stats---volume of material, vid format and size, updating etc, not to mention the discounts and trial warnings.

It's a business, but a good business that provides a valuable service. Used to be blind fishing when joining a site. It's like porn always has been, some put a nice flashy cover on a pile of dung! You open it up, and nothing's there. So, I don't see the "business" as being a negative at all, as long as it's run honestly. And as you know, negative comments/scores are not censored here.

I think your score is low.

02-18-09  08:28am - 5786 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Something I find curious is that the porn industry rarely, or never portrays the missionary position. They have something they call the missionary position, but it isn't.

This illustration is the missionary position:

http://www.icame.com/images/kama%20sutra/Missionary.jpg

The man and woman are parallel to each other, the man's body is straight with his legs straight back,the woman's legs around the man's waist in the air in symmetry. The man and womanare face to face. The porn industry's "missionary position" have the man in an upright position perpendicular to the woman with his legs wide apart. The woman's legs are in 2 differnt positions, usually one up, and one to the side. There is no face to face contact.

You may think my observation is trivial, but remember, you never see the true missionary position. It's like it's against the law. You have every position invented portrayed, some of them quite ugly and circus like. Some videos will run the gamut of positions---except the missionary.

I wondered why this obsession against the missionary position? You used to see it all the time. I came to this conclusion: with the preponderance of "gonzo" porn, sex is portrayed as a sport. The missionary position is the only one that has face to face intimacy, and intimacy is the opposite of gonzo sex. The porn industry and the performers might feel uncomfortable with intimacy when they're fucking like animals. And of course, the image of every scene with the man jacking himself off onto the woman, instead of climaxing inside of her is one of individual gratification instead of mutual. therefore, the missionary position is anathema to the current porn scene.

Thoughts? Edited on Feb 18, 2009, 08:35am

02-16-09  07:01pm - 5787 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I try to account for what other people might like about a site that I may not find very appealing. On the other hand, I think I make it clear what I like about sites. So, added with technical information, hopefully people will have a bit of an understanding of what's in the site irregardless of my score.

I try to do that anyway!

02-16-09  06:18am - 5788 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
DRM means you can not download anything.
You can only watch a video by being connected to the website that offers it.
They lie and tell you this is downloading, but if you can't watch the video offline, it is not.

02-11-09  06:18pm - 5792 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Any psychiatrist will tell you that if a man is afraid to look at heterosexual pornography there is the likelihood of latent homosexuality involved; the same goes for a man who is exclusively interested in lesbian porn.

Why you ask? Because if the homosexuality is latent, it can only express itself in veiled terms, in other words, Lesbianism is homosexuality, but with no males, therefore safe as expression. And fear of heterosexual porn is safe because it apparently denies the homosexuality that is latent by eliminating the penis from the viewing.

A heterosexual male would find a model with heterosexual porn, it's quite apparent. If you like baseball, you watch baseball, not hockey!

02-11-09  06:08pm - 5792 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Don't care either way. When you get to my age, porn is less about bodily functions and more about eroticism.

Unfortunately for me, most porn nowadays seems to be made with 15 year old boys in mind :(

02-10-09  06:08pm - 5793 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Er, farewell, Sophie Moone. From nude modeling and porno, that is. Just saw this announced at eurobabeindex.

I think she deserves a fine tribute. I've personally been dazzled silly by the sight of Sophie many a time. My own pics collection goes from AAAscan (probably a defunct site by now) to Zpornstars (yet another, I s'pose). There's even stuff I grabbed once a long while ago at OliverKlozov.

Wishing you well in all that you do in future years, Sophie. As for me, I'll continue to admire!


AAAscan is still listed here, but my browsers warn me not to enter! I never heard of that site.

02-08-09  06:48am - 5796 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Colm4:


I tried Nero but it constantly crashes. Perhaps because my pc isn't the newest.
In a few weeks, I will get a new pc (fast dual core, 4Gb ram, 1Gb video) so I guess I will try it then.


Nero chews up ram.

02-07-09  08:03am - 5797 days #14
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:




Actually, this machine has been having other kinds of problems just recently ("stop errors" that I can't seem to solve)


http://kadaitcha.cx/xp/stop_error.html

101-150 of 296 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 Page 3 4 5 6 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.