Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: jd1961 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (296)  |   Threads Started (18)

201-250 of 296 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Page 5 6 Next Page >

05-11-08  03:51pm - 6069 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Here's something that I just don't agree with at all, and I've seen such complaints before. I don't find the Eastern European women to be categorically any more or less "emotionless" than any other regionally defined group. There's plenty of passion and pleasure in videos and photosets I have of Mia Stone, Julie Silver, Marina/Euphrat, Sophie Paris, Lucy Lee, Mili Jay, etc. etc. etc.




I think the language barrier may have something to do with this perception. The producers out there still think we Americans must have everything anglicized. Did we talk about this before? Olga becomes Suzie, and she must not say anything, or else we will be "turned off". Of course, I don't think we feel that way.

05-11-08  03:47pm - 6069 days #8
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


I'll come to Colm's defense and say there is some sub par porn out there with robotic, emotionless models -- that also happen to be Eastern European. With so many porn stars being Eastern European now there are bound to be some bad ones.


That might be the fault of whoever's directing.

05-11-08  03:45pm - 6069 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Most American porn girls look like drunken sailors who just stumbled out of a tattoo parlor.
The euros look like women.

05-10-08  02:10am - 6070 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I forgot to mention I also am lucky to have almost all of Galitsin's sets before the site went under. The best nude photographer of them all.

05-10-08  02:06am - 6070 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I'd have to say my best porn find is my MPL Studios photo collection, in particular the massive Anya archive. Almost all the girls there are very beautiful, and the photography is outstanding. High resolution, great sets, and even the outdoor shots look good.

Worth the high price for the superior quality.

05-06-08  03:55am - 6074 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Eh, I didn't ask you.

05-05-08  09:25pm - 6074 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Do you guys think you could adjust your editing settings?
Most boards will allow for a few minutes of editing before the "edited x days ago" message appears. This allows for the editing of simple typos that occur.

05-05-08  09:21pm - 6074 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:



Any thoughts on the origins, continuation or the simple existence of Fashion Du Porn Star?


They know their audience like a hooker knows her john.

05-05-08  01:41am - 6075 days #8
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


In general:
Lets get some recommendations on the subject:
Latin girls - the real ones: Southamerican models of Brazil, Argentina, Columbia ect. (not US-based, let's skip Sativa Rose and alike).



Why don't you consider the American based girls "real" Latinas ? I know that they do!

05-03-08  08:00am - 6077 days #31
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


OK. Apology accepted. I do appreciate it. And I will accept that complimentary membership. I consider it a "gift horse" after all of the above. I've reopened my acceptance of emails forwarded from PU. Once I get the username and password from you, I'll close it again. (We all know how much spam can accumulate in a short time.)

Thanks again.


Shouldn't I get a free membership for beginning this thread?

05-03-08  07:57am - 6077 days #12
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


"Gonzo, the lead guitar player, placed his mutated member into her slithering slit! HA-HA!" (from Frank Zappa's 200 Motels)


That's a great movie.

05-02-08  07:11pm - 6077 days #16
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


MET Art (or Met Art as Porn Users spells despite it being an abbreviation not a name)


Those old Most Erotic Teens sets aren't so easy to come by anymore.

05-02-08  07:08pm - 6077 days #35
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by malikstarks:


To be fair the editors of this site it would be difficult if not impossible to list all of the porn sites on the internet. There are literally millions of sites out there, and estimates on expansion put it at about 200 new sites a day.


And most of them aren't worth downloading for free.

05-02-08  07:05pm - 6077 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by JBDICK:


further down it gets worse...

Teenage slut gets her box penetrated by old friend




WTF o.O

05-02-08  07:00pm - 6077 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


Agree totally - but there are some ok scenes there too....



OK, but I sure hope that guy didn't receive payment!

05-02-08  06:57pm - 6077 days #26
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Awesome.

We have webmaster contact in the thread about webmaster contact!

05-02-08  04:52am - 6078 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Some may find this thread useful. I'll begin with my opinions:

Best: MPL Studios.
I had a speed problem, they diagnosed and corrected quickly and friendly.

Worst: Deep Throat Frenzy.
Had problem acessing the site. They basically told me to go "F" myself.

05-02-08  04:45am - 6078 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by pat362:


I can't speak out of experience because I never tried it, but from what I've read, Rame.net might have been similar in the fact fans interacted with each other.


The IAFD (Internet Adult Film Database) totally rocks as a resource.
And you can use it as a search addon in Firefox.

05-01-08  04:59am - 6079 days #17
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Khan:


But you would be incorrect.

Here isn't really the place to go into the history of Title 18 U.S.C. &#65533; 2257 (along w/ related statues) and how it impacts adult sites so let's suffice it to say we have our reasons for not posting images.


But you already carry images of the homepages of all the sites, most of which show pornographic material. Won't you have to censor those also?

04-30-08  01:06pm - 6080 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:



my18teens.com




Go to the preview page, and scroll down to the preview titled:
"Teen D evon fucked hard by daddy's friend"

That guy is everything that's wrong with porn !

04-30-08  01:03pm - 6080 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by JBDICK:



I am a major European Girls Poon Hound myself...they are just built better
And they don't look like a drunken sailor that just stumbled out of a tattoo parlor.

04-30-08  12:58pm - 6080 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Khan:


We used to have images, but removed them due to new 2257 laws that have been looming over the past few years (which are still up in the air). Hosting images and/or videos moves us into a different level of risk as an adult site in the USA.
But any photo you would carry would be verified from the site it came from. And I believe that your site is not required to have documentation.

04-30-08  07:54am - 6080 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Khan:


You can point to a site (their PU listing) that has the content but you may not use any part of the PU system for sharing content.
That's what I thought.
And since we're on the subject, why doesn't TBP have samples provided to them, as similar sites do? That's good business sense for sites, and it would enhance your site.

04-30-08  04:35am - 6080 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by malikstarks:




*Also for you trivia heads out there; obviously the POV concept had been around for quite a while without actually being considered a category or genre, but what year would you consider that the concept really took off and was considered an official porn genre?
The so called "POV' genre used to be considered obscene, and you won't see it much in early porn. As a matter of fact, that is why you see so many closeups of guy's faces in early porn, especially when he is climaxing. The producers were careful to make sure that it didn't seem the actress was playing to the viewer, and that what was being shown was a dramatization, and had nothing to do with the sexual excitement of the viewer.

Nowadays, only dinosaur companies like Vivid and Wicked show endless closeups of males faces. Most modern companies never do.

04-30-08  04:30am - 6080 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I think the problem is that it is never properly presented. The only place I see it properly presented is on Japanese sites. You'll see western POV video, and the camera will be on the side. Or the male will be talking. Or the girl will be talking to the actor, and not the viewer.

I've looked through the POV sites listed here, and I can not find an authentic one.

04-30-08  04:26am - 6080 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by littlejoe:


thx for clearing that up. i didnt do a good job 1st time around
If you re-read my original post, I am not referring to that. I'm referring to this:

http://img209.imagevenue.com/img.php?ima...ol_043_123_428lo.jpg

04-29-08  06:31pm - 6080 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I'm not sure that full sets will be allowed here.

04-29-08  06:29pm - 6080 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by littlejoe:


i like closeups where the girl is lying on her back and u can see her face in the background


That's not a closeup. A closeup is when the body part fills the whole frame.

04-29-08  11:23am - 6081 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Something that has bothered me about porn for many years is the body part closeup.

I've seen photo sets where I have counted a dozen straight body part closeup photos, which is continued a few photos later.

I've seen videos where the camera will zoom in as close as possible for a minute or so, zoom back for a few seconds, then zoom right back in.

As far as I'm concerned, this may interest someone who doesn't know what a girl looks like naked, but I find it to be infantile. Someone here made a comment about this, and the webmaster wrote back sounding very surprised, as if he thought that's what people really wanted to see.

Is that what you really want to see?

04-28-08  01:51pm - 6082 days #8
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Colm4:


It seems that a lot of people are interested in pictures on pay-sites. But can someone explain to me why?

I mean, there's no movement, no sound, it's all staged and you have to constantly press a button or mouse to see the next one.
I will probably never be interested in it myself but I hope to understand it better why people like them so much.
Because with all photography, the movement is in the imagination. With videos, you are depending on someone else's imagination. And it's usually some schmoe with a camera having no idea what he's doing.

04-26-08  01:12am - 6084 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Thanks, those are handy improvements.

04-26-08  01:04am - 6084 days #18
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I have talked to several webmasters off site, like Brad at Xisty and had a few emails with Nick at Babelicious, but it was mainly just joking around and asking about if they were going to get this model or that model. Brad was really helpful and I would even give him messages to tell Fred the photographer about taking pictures. The ones I have talked to didn't ask to rate them high, just seemed like normal guys about my age that liked talking about beautiful women.

As I recall, you were shamelessly used by Evelyn Lory when she used a quote of yours on her site.
She owes you big time!!

04-25-08  01:17pm - 6085 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I read Kaede Matsushima's blog. I can't understand a word of it, but she updates frequently, and it looks nice !

http://www.sancmagazine.com/kaede/kaedeblog/

04-25-08  01:13pm - 6085 days #14
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I was contacted by KarupsPC. Their contact person asked me to reconsider the rating I gave them. I was also offered a free membership, but in a second email close in time to the first. I just changed my settings at PU so that webmasters couldn't contact me by email. Been that way since.

Months later, there was exchange between myself and the KarupsPC guy at the reviews part of KarupsPC. (See replies to the review by the since-disabled "Congestus.") He chides me for ignoring those emails; the words he uses are that he "reached out" to me. But there was nothing at that time to "reach out" with because the major site update was months away from completion. My rating was based on the site as it WAS at the time, not as it was "promised" to be in the future. (I'm a sceptical sort. Have the burn marks to back it up.)

Anyway, I wrote a long reponse to his chiding message to me; he replied by completely ignoring it and offering me a complementary membership right there in front of everyone.

I guess he thinks that's OK. I don't get that guy.


I remember. Caused me not to join the site.

04-25-08  01:08pm - 6085 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I've only been contacted twice. Once was just an innocent encounter. The other, Paul Markham, gets into defending his site and comments a lot on the reviews he gets here.
I have avoided his site just because of this.

04-24-08  11:43pm - 6085 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


Well, well, well, JD.
Swell post!!!!
Of course we had - and guess that goes for you too and other "old timers" here at PU.
But folks, those webmasters know the difference between a good offer to a PU and a bribe.
The bribe is normally never offered openly.
Still I had some mails from webmasters offering a free term or a special bargain, if I'd write a review- no matter the outcome.

Yes, it hasn't happened in a while. But I think the webmasters have seen that we have cleaned up this place considerably. I still can't get over how ridiculous our top 10 sites were. I remember there was one webmaster of a pretty low rent site that kept writing in and blasting everyone who criticized the "top ranked" site!

04-24-08  11:39pm - 6085 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
After a time, I always edit. But I am a lot more interested in photographs than videos, so I have a lot more room to spare and can take my time. The videos I do have are off computer and consist mostly of the classics.

04-24-08  02:29pm - 6086 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Ha ha - hmmm, somebody knows Rochester well. Indeed I did, I don't go there often as I should, but every once in a while I make it to a show and the 3D ones are just such a treat!

Rochester has its pluses and minuses, but you certainly cannot knock it for its movie selections. I mean, hell - I might not have ever run across Takashi Miike if it were not for the Dryden Theater (at the George Eastman House for those who don't know).
I have been to Rachacha a number of times, but never made it to Eastman, although I always wanted to see a full blown silent movie production there.

04-24-08  03:53am - 6086 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Have you ever had a webmaster contact you off site as a result of your PU status?
And did any of them try to "bribe" you in exchange for a good score?
Or was the contact an innocent attempt for attention?

04-23-08  02:29am - 6087 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


- for example, the musical "Kiss Me Kate", released in 1953, was distributed as true 3D using polarized lenses on twin projectors - I've seen it in its original form and the effect was stunning - and it is the same technology IMAX is employing today. The only difference is they don't usually use cardboard glasses.


I notice you live in Rochester---did you see this at Eastman?

04-21-08  02:47pm - 6089 days #39
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by malikstarks:


Now we have reached the point where many are complaining that the porn is to "boring". Think about it, I would doubt if too many guys from the 1970's, 80's, or even the 1990's would have entertained that sentiment.
I'm one of those guys, and I most definitely entertain that sentiment. I've reached the point that I can't even watch the XXX stuff.

04-21-08  02:43pm - 6089 days #38
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by pat362:


The original query was whether the porn industry is too main stream. I don't think so because there is little if any mention of porn in mainstream media.
I didn't mention anything about the mainstream media. In fact, I'm fairly certain that the "mainstream media" is out of touch with the mainstream!
Rather, I say porn has climbed out of the underground, and is now run by people better suited to selling deodorant.

04-20-08  09:59pm - 6089 days #12
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
To make my self clearer, I am not referring to people who don't have money to spend on sites. I am referring to those who obviously have a gripe about a site, and only join here in attempt to do damage to a site.
After we complained about site shills, TBP listened and created a system that removed all these ridiculous sites that dominated "our" top ten list. I think it may only be fair to webmasters to eliminate those who obviously have an agenda against a site.

04-20-08  09:54pm - 6089 days #8
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Marilyn Chambers was famously the young mother in the Ivory Soap campaign and was working the Hollywood scene to be an actress before her porn break out.
But no one knew about her Ivory Soap commercial until after she did porn, am I correct?

04-20-08  01:04pm - 6090 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Imageshack doesn't allow sites with the word "porn" in it, so the photos don't show
Try imagevenue.com

04-19-08  11:38am - 6091 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
To answer your question, I would have to say Jenna Haze is as professional as they come. Edited on Apr 19, 2008, 11:41am

04-19-08  11:37am - 6091 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by JBDICK:



It doesn't apply to male pornstars because we all know they do it for the porn because they get paid shit wages...

That's not true, they get paid quite well. I think porn would be a lot better if they didn't get paid at all.

04-19-08  11:30am - 6091 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


What do you think of people who use PU once to slam a site, and then never come back?
This is not to say any criticism is unwarranted, but I have noticed recently quite a few people joining us to express their dissatisfaction with a site they joined, and then you never hear from them again.
I know the anti-shill measures are in place to protect the average scores, but personally I would like to see "one review wonders" removed after a time.

04-16-08  03:47am - 6094 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Colm4:


Can some of you experts tell what the difference is between 1280x720 HD MP4 and 1280x720 HD DivX?

Alsscan occasionally has the choice between these 2 formats. The MP4 is almost unplayable on my PC. Like it slows down and stutters a lot.
Are you opening the MP4 with Quicktime?

04-13-08  02:17pm - 6097 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


It seems, if you post on IMDB's forums, your IQ drops immediately to the double digits... maybe even single digits. I've seen fruit salads with better commentary on movies.
You're not kidding either!

201-250 of 296 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 Page 5 6 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.