Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: jd1961 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (296)  |   Threads Started (18)

151-200 of 296 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 Page 4 5 6 Next Page >

02-07-09  07:54am - 5797 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


To expand a bit on the previous explanations, I wanted to postulate first the reason it might be taking a while - do you happen to have multiple hard drives? Internet Explorer, being the archaic program that it is, stores it's download temporary files exclusively on the main system drive,


That's right. IE downloads, then copies.

02-07-09  07:46am - 5797 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Colm4:


I joined a site that had very small movies. In total it was like 4 Gb. So I thought I could burn that whole site to 1 DVD. To my surprise, adding just one 40 Mb movie, my burnprogram says it's 380 Mb's. So now I need like 5 DVD's for all.
I checked 2 different burnprograms and both do it that way.
Anyone know what's going on and how to fix that?


Your burn program converts the video file before burning it.

02-05-09  05:02am - 5799 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Shouldn't that really be "pro boner" :) Oh, wait, I guess that's what those guys are. As an aside on this topic, I wonder how the girls feel about having sex with gay guys if that even matters at all?


Most of them are in it for the money. So I don't think they really care.

02-05-09  05:00am - 5799 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by badandy400:


That is no to say that all of the guys are like that and none of them are attracted to the women


Name one. Seriously, most of these guys are gay.

02-04-09  06:11am - 5800 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


I joined Manojob today (thanks Denner, it is a good site) and I checked out the forum.
There was a thread complaining about the hired guys playing with themselves, especially at the end of the scene. The webmaster (or he may have been the director) replied by saying that he has a hell of a time making these guys keep their hands off themselves! He said some of them just won't listen to him, and tell him they can't get off with a girl touching them!!! (yuck--a girl!)
He basically went on to state that most of the guys in porn are really creepy! I suggested that he might try hiring straight guys! So this explains a lot---maybe it's not always the producers' fault. But they try over there, and it is a quality site.

02-04-09  04:07am - 5800 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by NMC2008:


It's like now, this day and age, with a world full of douchebags, I wouldn't be surprised if they were doing it just to piss us off, I mean I am sure they know this is a top annoyance in their industry


I don't think they do know this. I wrote a comment about this on another site, and the webmaster wrote back seeming very surprised that I was complaining about it. These are the same people that end every scene showing a guy playing with his own dick, I just don't think the intelligence level of these guys is above the fast food level.

That's it! This is "fast food" porn!

02-04-09  04:02am - 5800 days #8
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
BTW, is porn that only has 2 people involved in production, the paid girl, and a guy holding a camera, nothing more than videotaped prostitution?

02-04-09  03:59am - 5800 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


Once again, but man, is this theme importend:
How many PUs enjoy all that talk from some (stupid) camera-man, like: "Whats your name", "how old are you", "what position do you like the best", "do you like sucking cock", ect.
Jeeeez - don't they ever learn?
Just saw a comment from jd about this tug-site - and agree: it's a bummer.
Just joined one other "typical" US-site: ManoJob.
Man, it CAN work out - here the remarks from the cameraman is almost nada - they leave it all up to the model- Thanks!
When do these other guys behind a heck of a lot of sites learn: Stop the yapping...


My comment was somewhat rude, but I hope the webmaster there reads it. It's always the same. "Show us your ass", and then he cops a cheap feel. Every time. Very unprofessional. Let the girl play to the audience. The worst porn of all is when the male performer is the one holding the camera. A scam IMO.

02-02-09  07:26am - 5802 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:



And the abusive stuff has got to go, too. Sex should be pleasurable, not painful or degrading. That shit gives porn a bad name.


Or at least put it back in its niche.

I do wonder what effect the conviction and imprisonment of Max Hardcore will have on all this.

02-02-09  07:23am - 5802 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by pat362:




This is my lost of what is needed to film a good scene:
A makeup artist, clothes for all performers (these must include underwear as well as outer wear), dialogue, actual
set (sofa, bed and side of pool don't count), lighting, professional videographer, good director, proper editing and chemistry between the players.




Premium Japanese Adult Video is where you'll find this; with some extreme stuff as well.

But a lot of people can't get past the mosaics.

01-31-09  05:57am - 5804 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


What are your thoughts on the contemporary American porn scene?

I was browsing through TBP's listings, and it seems to me that all American porn has been reduced to what I call Circus Sex. Crazy, fast and nasty. The guys act like sex offenders who escaped from State prison yesterday, the girls like the cheapest street corner hooker. The sex positions are ugly and all exactly the same...like a freak show. Lots of spitting, hands in the girl's mouth, stepping on her face, stretching her butthole so wide that a truck could drive through, the slapping, the gagging, the bile. The endless shots of men playing with themselves furiously like some pervert behind the bushes. Quite frankly, the girls are mostly unnatractive, even ugly, what with their multiple tattoos and piercings and terrible hair styles.

WTF is up with this? Who is demanding the uglification of sex? Why are these companies giving us all this "zoo" sex? To whom is it being targeted?

I've looked at porn for a long time, and American porn used to be the cream of the crop. Now it's just so much bargain bin crap, IMO. Edited on Jan 31, 2009, 06:07am

01-28-09  07:26pm - 5806 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
The problem with the porn shops in my area is that they carry nothing but American title. And, IMO, American porn is at an all time low as far as quality is concerned.

01-27-09  07:09pm - 5807 days #15
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I "went on the wagon" for a long period last year. It was good to take a break.

On the other hand, maybe their wives shut down their accounts ;-)

01-27-09  07:04pm - 5807 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
The effects of the fleecing of the world by politicians of all ilks has yet to be felt yet.

It will.

01-27-09  07:02pm - 5807 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I can tell you that if a screw up happens, and for some reason a site gives you a refund, it takes days for it to get back into your prepaid account. Of course, you're actually paying more for each site due to the charge for the CC.

Good if you don't have a CC/Debit card. But not worth it if you do.

01-26-09  04:03am - 5809 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:




I think Khan, Rick and the others do a good job. Sometimes they spammers stay up for a while but they all seem to come down or get their links fried in short order. I can't really imagine the PU staff wanting to give any one else the "keys to the kingdom"


I never said they didn't do a good job.

I am not suggesting they make anyone here an administrator, just a mod. It seems appropriate that a PU should mod the PU forum. After all, they trust us to write reviews, which could have a detrimental effect on them. So what would the problem be?

01-24-09  06:46am - 5811 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


The thinking seems to be: the more, the merrier. PU wants as many members as possible.


I'm not referring to them. I'm referring to spammers. These are the people that spend all day posting junk in forums.
And the best way to combat them is to make sure their posts are deleted immediately, or they'll come back if they see their posts lingering for hours.

01-24-09  04:13am - 5811 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


A lot of spam here lately. This forum is getting known, which means these creeps will be showing up more, not less.

Why not have some Porn Users members as mods?

I nominate Toadsith, he seems to be here often.

01-24-09  04:10am - 5811 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Yeah, I don't think it was VideoBox who posted this. The link in question had an affiliate marker tied in - no point VideoBox themselves putting that in.

I'm actually surprised this thread wasn't deleted in its entirety. Probably it is due to responses being made to it.


I sent TBP a warning to delete this. Now we have 4 fresh threads of spam.

01-12-09  08:03am - 5823 days #61
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by badandy400:


As I said before, what you do privately is your business so long as it stays private. I never said I condemned nor condoned piracy. I just do not believe it is something that one should flaunt.




I don't and won't join DRM sites, but if I did, I would be concerned over the "piracy" of my privacy.

01-11-09  01:22am - 5824 days #56
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Ergo Proxy:


I understood that no one is interested in my moral feelings, so let's get back to the porn.
I also did not mention the names of the programs I use, because it would have led to major brouhaha here, I know that too.
I simply want to state that I remove the DRM and keep the videos for myself.
This does not affect any single atom or subatomic particle outside my hard drive, right?


I have no problem using a program that removes DRM spyware from my computer.

01-11-09  01:16am - 5824 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Sounds like another life-altering experience, a young guy watching his first porno. (For me, it was Annette Haven and Johnny Wadd in a thing called "Black Silk Stockings." Ever since that day, the gratification I've gotten from Annette has always been "extra special." And she's older that I am!)




I liked Annette because she was older than me!

Here are some nice public domain photos of Annette:

http://www.imagebam.com/image/9005e523323640

http://www.imagebam.com/image/1ffeac23323631

http://www.imagebam.com/image/70238223323626

http://www.imagebam.com/image/90fc5f23323615

http://www.imagebam.com/image/5b6b4b23323603

http://www.imagebam.com/image/f3245e23323576

http://www.imagebam.com/image/80bc5d23323589

http://www.imagebam.com/image/73f23623323596

01-10-09  01:52am - 5825 days #20
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Hey anyone notice Cybertoad had disabled his account? If you're out there Toad, just cos you're not subscribing to tons of sites doesn't mean you can't have fun on the forum. You'll be a great loss. Stick around and make some posts or quick comments. I thought you said you were gonna stick around.


I did that when I took time out from porn collecting.
He wrote:

"Porn burn out, thats one I watch carefully too do not want to become desensiticed to what is in real life and what I see in videos."

That's what happened to me. Always does, and I take a half year off or so, do other things. He'll probably be back. Edited on Jan 10, 2009, 01:56am

01-07-09  11:55am - 5828 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I have a new 22" monitor that can be flipped on a hinge!
So you get a long perspective for those full length photos, must have been created with porn in mind!

http://hpshopping.speedera.net/www.shopp...ucts/ry117aa_400.jpg

01-05-09  09:14pm - 5829 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I just went a long time without a membership.

01-03-09  01:23pm - 5832 days #19
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by IKnoPorn:


I like Firefox with DownThemAll! It's really a great combo, interesting to read here that others have had trouble with it. I'm very comfortable with this combo, so much so I haven't felt the need to go with anything else.

Now, this is a bit off-topic, but jd1961 has the only avatar I want to "do". Damn, that asian babe with the Santa hat was hot, and now this one! I'm going to look in depth at your reviews, jd1961, and hopefully find some good asian reviews!!


She's Kaede Matsushima.

You'll find tons of her videos at:
Sexasian18
Jsexnetwork
Actionjav

http://www.imagebam.com/image/c5542a22604114

01-02-09  06:55pm - 5832 days #17
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by messmer:


Is there any feature in Internet Explorer or Opera that would allow me to duplicate this?


This may be what you're looking for:

http://help.opera.com/Windows/9.60/en/security.html

01-01-09  11:08pm - 5833 days #14
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by badandy400:


I have been using Firefox for a long while now. It has served me well, except for the new version. It seems to not be compatible with my download manager and I had to revert back to an older version.


Do you mean Download them all?

01-01-09  08:55pm - 5833 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I did have some pretty frustrating problems with Firefox lately. I kept getting the "Firefox is already open" error. I finally had had enough.


That's happened to me a few times too.
Just open your task manager (Ctrl+Alt+Del) and shut the process.

I don't think FF is as good as it once was.

01-01-09  08:46pm - 5833 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Trust ratings that is!

Congratulations, you deserve it, your reviews have been very helpful to me.

12-25-08  12:29pm - 5841 days #26
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


AGREE: Forgot about Racquel Darrian - her vids and phosets were among the best - way back then. Even if the quality of some videos are/were not the best - still have some in the archives. A long, lean og smashing brunette!!! AND she probably had the best looking tits at that time... guess they were natural too even if they looked "made-up" (but no sure).


When you wrote her name it turned into a link---I didn't know she had a site. If she is indeed the owner.

12-25-08  12:18pm - 5841 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Merry Christmas!

12-25-08  12:15pm - 5841 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
They control newspapers, libraries,schools, radio, television, satellites---why would anyone be surprised that they would control the internet?

Those prohibited sites listed have been the ongoing excuse to do this.

12-20-08  09:12pm - 5845 days #22
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I miss Riley Mason.

She looked pregnant in her last video!

12-20-08  09:02pm - 5845 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


Just do not remember: Have we had this discussion before? (sorry if so, but could not locate it):

Are there too much outdoor photosets/videos at pornsites - both softcore and hardcore?




I hate photo shoots on boulders! Femjoy is often guilty of this.

I hate photo shoots where the model is covered in dirt! Again, Femjoy is often guilty of this, and I have told them so often!

For some reason, the only outdoor shoots I like are in a fall setting, I guess because of the colors.

And seeing as I'm about to get hit with another blizzard, I do not like shoots in snow!

As far as hardcore is concerned, this is gross, but I remember seeing videos shot outdoors where there were flies buzzing around where you would not want them buzzing! Never for HC. Edited on Dec 20, 2008, 09:07pm

12-16-08  06:48pm - 5849 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


mr smut, thanks for the offer of help.

My Firefox problem is not just one specific site, but any site that requires username + password entry.




That's odd, I never heard of that.

Why don't you try uninstalling/reinstalling.

12-07-08  06:52am - 5859 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by sitsat:




Well, the action certainly looks good... other than the fact that in EVERY scene the stupid dorky cameraman has to put his hands all over the girl's ass to 'help' her out. Why?!

Why do they have to do things like this? It totally kills every single scene. People in the industry make out that it's hard work doing what they do, and we, the paying viewers, don't understand what it's like. Well, if they're so professional


It's because the guys producing porn are dumb. Simple as that. And also the girls let these guys get away with murder. You've seen the cameraman interview, you know "what's your name, show us your tits" that junk. And then he starts copping cheap feels, etc. The girls shouldn't allow that.

If you can, leave comments at the sites that have that feature enabled. I do all the time, like: "This video was ruined by the camera man talking". We have to give them feedback.

12-03-08  08:14pm - 5862 days #19
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:




I have always thought the kick from watching hardcore was that the beautiful people are paid to have sex for our entertainment


No offense, but to me, that's a creepy thought, like peeking in someone's window.

As far as I'm concerned, the male performers faces should never be shown, certainly not in closeup, and NEVER looking directly into the camera or talking to the audience. I think it was Andrew Blake who said the males were "merely props", meaning stand ins for the viewer, or hired dicks. I can't stand seeing the same ones in porn forever, I don't think they should be paid, and remember "Jon Dough"? he killed himself because his porno days were over. No one ever talks about it, but I think porn is a very bad place for a man to be, because he gets stuck there, unlike the girls who are mostly in and out quickly.

They should not be used after a year, a dime a dozen I say!

12-03-08  08:03pm - 5862 days #18
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by messmer:


LOL. I just had to go to look up your age, it seems that most under twenty-five almost insist that the model be shaved and hair is now considered distasteful or, worse yet, a fetish, where only a generation ago shaving was considered to be kinky! Unless you are talking about the act of shaving itself. I haven't come across too many of those in the videos I watch.


No, I mean it being mandatory. On some girls, it looks nice. On others, it's pimply and stubbly and unnatractive.
On guys it's creepy. In the old days we would have said it was "gay", but I guess you can't say that anymore.

Anyway, the point I'm making is the porn industry is stodgy and stuck in their stereotypes worse than any old missionary.

BTW, there is no crotch shaving mania in Japan, and very little ink disfigurment, I guess that's one of the reasons I like it better. And I have to say that I am horrified at the thought that young people are learning about sex through American porn. Not good for young women. Do they think having their genitals spat upon is nice? Edited on Dec 03, 2008, 08:07pm

12-03-08  07:55pm - 5862 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I can get anything I want for free, but I like to be in a site. It's easier, and I like being a member of a good well organized site.

But I have nothing against collector to collector sharing.

12-02-08  06:57pm - 5863 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by messmer:


The spitting really gets me. Also irritating, but on a lesser scale, is the model slapping her own butt in every second scene you watch!


I hate that. And the obligatory circus positions. In every video. For an industry that refuses to portray the missionary position (the real missionary position, not the one where the guy is perpendicular to the girl), they sure are stodgy and formulated. Like their version of doggy style, the girl must have one of her arms all the way touching her buttt, and she must have her head turned.

And don't get me started on the mandatory crotch shaving. I think it's a law in pornoville.

12-02-08  09:24am - 5864 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Gonzo porn was great when it first arrived on the scene because most of it had a sense of humor to it, like "Shut Up And Blow Me", but nowadays it's pretty grim and most of it shows rutting scenes with a lot of guys furtively pulling their puds, and all the stupid cliches like hair pulling and spitting, and ugh...

11-28-08  06:26am - 5868 days #18
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


Well, bro - sure the scores at PU are subjective - what else could it possibly be? I do not think there can be anything objective in this field - every PU gives reviews and scores after their own (and hopefully) honest opinion...
I think that's the deal here.


If you get to know the members, you see what they like and dislike and how that reflects in a score. I won't criticize a high score for a BBW site, which is not my preference, if I know the user has a thing for the portly ladies!

11-28-08  06:20am - 5868 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
When I cancel, I always search the site separately. But I also keep my memberships organized on my desktop so I never forget.

11-28-08  05:16am - 5868 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
If I like a site well enough to spend multiple months as a paying customer, I grade it in the 90s.

11-26-08  12:51am - 5870 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Shakermaker:


Hi!

I recently found some clips at a free video porn site, that showed Japanese girls/women that 'attacked' a man and sucked and fucked him. I been looking for websites/movies that have this kind of porn niche, but not able to find some.




You can find that stuff at jsexnetwork and sexasian18, but you'll have to dig around for it. I don't know of any site that specializes in that, there are so few Japanese sites available to westerners, although that is beginning to change.

11-26-08  12:45am - 5870 days #15
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Monahan:




But also the action was like most all movies; there was no eye "contact" with the camera.




That's because back then in the '60s and '70s it was considered obscene to make a movie that aided the viewer in thinking he was a part of it, ie: POV porn. That's why there was "acting" in porno in the first place. To keep from being prosecuted.

05-15-08  07:57am - 6065 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


http://www.clubericacampbell.com/

I was embarrassed by the comments made about Erica's change that she courageously announced in public recently. Porn consumers are always insisting upon tolerance for our hobby. But when you demand tolerance, where do you draw the line in giving it? I think it's blatantly obvious she has been traumatized by her experience, and it should make us thoughtful instead of defensive.

05-13-08  08:16pm - 6066 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I actually sought out reviewers that I felt I could trust, and made sure that they knew it was me. Some of them returned the favor. (And it worked the other way around, too.)

So, Denner, it's time to get schmoozin'! I'll bet you'll have that 30 and your final badge in no time!

Good luck!

And about negatives, over the past year or longer I've had several, always from "anonymous," which mysteriously came and later disappeared. I was like, "Oh." And then later, "Wha- ? Tsh! Whatever."
I have 1 negative rating from my first week here, I could never figure out from who or for why.

05-13-08  04:50am - 6067 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Yes, I think we've had this kind of conversation before. And perhaps some porn consumers have that attitude that everything must be "Anglicized" or "Americanized" (in a very narrow, "white" preconception that misses the enormous contributions of everyone else).

Pier999 is one of those sites that gives phony, American-sounding names to Eastern Europeans: Rita Barrett, Sandra Lane, Sally Walker, Becky Milar, Andrea Randall, Rachel Linton, Diane Moore, Candy Hunter, Marie Sheridan, Tonya Tyler, Patty Gower (for Marina/Euphrat), Veronica Drake, Zoe Saint, etc. (And in all fairness, there are also some such as Teresa Ilova, Marketa Brymova, and Mariana Pokova.)

Do we really need to have our porn spoon-fed to us like this? Mariana Pokova -- that's Lenka Horokova! How's about Aneta Smrhova? Marketa Belonoha? Zsanett &#65533;gerh&#65533;zy?

Ohhh, scary, foreign-sounding names! It's distracting! Damn if I didn't lose my (note the name) Johnson! I'm outta here!

Maybe there is a language barrier, but where, precisely, is it? I submit that resistance to the girl's real names (should they wish to actually use them), or pseudonyms from their own languages, and to their speaking their own languages, is at least half of it.

I see no trouble enjoying the interview videos from VirtuaGirlHD with the girls speaking in their native tongues. That's seeing them more of how they really are. (Of course, the English subtitles were necessary. I'm a long way off from my rank beginner status in Hungarian and Czech.)

I even once found (and have kept) a hot, unsubtitled hardcore video of Lucie Horinkova that was all in Czech. So does she really have to be homogenized into "Victorie Kay?" We're interested in beauty and sex here, right? Would it really matter if the girl was screaming "bassza meg!"


Maybe it's a product of the Cold War. Remember we were all told that Eastern Euro women were ugly fat things working in a field? I think that's where this "robotic" stereotype comes from. To be honest, I never had any idea that eastern Euro women were so good looking.

151-200 of 296 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 Page 4 5 6 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.