Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: rearadmiral (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1453)  |   Threads Started (206)

1201-1250 of 1453 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 24 Page 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next Page >

02-26-11  08:48am - 5048 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


For me it was Adult Check, which I joined about 13 or 14 years ago. I stayed a member for several years. I started with them when I had a dial-up connection, which worked reasonably well because at the time they were pretty much only pics or very small videos. I see they're still around, and they appear to work on the same principle of being a clearing house for a lot of other smaller sites.

Anyone else remember their first?

02-26-11  05:12am - 5048 days #28
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by otoh:


As you've discovered, different combinations of DVD formats, players, burning software etc, can be an issue to deal with.

You may be better off with a hardware media player. You can get ones that plug into your PC and act like an external hard drive, that you copy files to; then, once loaded, plug into your TV and have a remote control that you can use to browse and play the contents.

Obviously costs a bit more than buying blank DVDs, but not hugely expensive and in theory far more convenient. I'm not sure of any specific brands offhand, but if you don't find any, let me know and I'll try to hunt something down for you...


I agree that this is a workable solution, but there is a serious downside to these devices: they only play the newest versions of files that are capable of supporting HD. 90%+ of my collection is wmv files. Only a small percentage of those are in wmv9 format, but these devices will only play wmv9. They won't play versions 5-8, which are in wide use on porn sites. Check the properties of your files and if you have a lot of older versions of videos they probably won't play.

If you don't have a lot of files to deal with, you could convert them.

The manufacturers of these devices don't really make it obvious that they only play the newest versions of files. I have no idea why they wouldn't build in more capability.

02-20-11  11:47am - 5054 days #2
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I'm not sure if there are websites that cater to this niche, but I'd guess there are. You can also stream videos from some of the VOD sites. Look for any of the American Gokkun series from JM Productions. Gokkun is exactly what you're looking for. These videos feature well known porn stars who have maybe a hundred guys jerk off on them and they catch the stuff in a dish or something and then drink it. Some of the later editions of the American Bukkake series from JM Productions also offer a lot of swallowing.

Your best bet if you want to find and view any of the American Gokkun or American Bukkake series is to go to IAFD and search the titles. That will link you to reviews that might help you choose and will also give you links to where you can find the movies online.

If you want to add cum swapping to the mix, my recommendation is to check out the scene with Chelsie Rae and Keeani Lei in American Gokkun 5. They swap a large amount of cum back and forth through a clear pipe. It's an excellent scene.

And welcome to Pornusers. I think you'll find this site is an excellent resource and the staff and members are all great to deal with.

02-16-11  04:11am - 5058 days #6
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


Hi Manos,

I don't know who compiled that list. Political unrest in Canada? Australia? The U.K.? Ireland? Belgium? The U.S.? Italy? Israel? Argentina?

All these countries may have their usual divisions along partisan lines, which is something to be expected in a Democracy, but, as to Canada for one example, there's not the slightest sign of political unrest here and we don't have "strict laws regarding censorship" any longer.

If they are still on the books they are being ignored thanks to the reality of a borderless Internet, except when it comes to the subject p@dophilia. So I don't think your theory holds water. IMO.


I dunno messmer, I'm Canadian too and I just put a bumper sticker on my car that says "I support the CBC." Some people might consider that a political uprising.

Serious though, this list looks pretty suspicious.

02-14-11  05:25pm - 5060 days #8
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


Think of it as a wake-up call, admiral.....cuz if you think she got a bit miffed this time, one shutters to think of the consequences if it happens on her Birthday ....or, God forbid, a wedding anniversary.


Amen to that. And I'm baaaaad with dates...

02-14-11  03:25pm - 5060 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


errr ... did she offer any further explanation?

My guess would be, that was her way of making sure you knew when Valentine's day was ... but that's just a guess. Trying to figure out why women do things is something I gave up on years ago.


No further explanation.

Your words are wise. There are some things I've just given up even trying to understand, and the fairer sex tops that list. I have a gay male cousin who is married (and it didn't cause the moral fabric of society to tear asunder...) and sometimes I wonder if being married to male would be easier. Then I think to the three times a year I have sex with my spouse and figure that I'll stick with what I have.

02-14-11  01:34pm - 5060 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
My bride wanted me to get her a gift certificate for a local spa. I learned the hard way that buying a gift certificate from a small, independednt business in an industry that is probably among the first to be hit by a downturn in discretionary spending isn't such a good idea. The spa goes tits up with my money. I won't get fooled again. So I made her my own gift certificate instead. If I go tits up she gets the money anyway...

My bride is also fairly illogical, of which I was reminded last night. We were all settled in, she watching mindless crap on the telly, me reading mindless crap in a magazine. She says to me in a very sarcastic tone "Happy Valentine's Day to you too." I was a bit startled. Not because I missed Valentine's Day but because someone obviously forgot to tell me that the day was moved to the 13th. I looked at her and told her that Valentine's Day is tomorrow, to which she replied, "I know, but if it was today you'd have missed it." I can't win...

02-11-11  06:52pm - 5063 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


It may be true, but I think that it may also be a good thing. I have hardly been a shill for the industry in the time I have been here, but there are now so many sites that aren't updating and just reissuing old material, I think realistically we are going to have to, and should pay a little more. For the price of a round of drinks for just a few friends you can download porn that would have cost thousands, thirty, twenty, or even ten years ago.


I hadn't thought of it that way, TheSquirrel. Good point. I'm always willing to pay for quality, I guess I just got it stuck in my head that the highest price I'd be willing to pay was $20.

02-11-11  06:12pm - 5063 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I’ll admit right off that my sample is really limited: I check out sites reviewed by the reviewers at TBP and by you at PU, but it seems that the average monthly subscription price is up a bit. I used to think $19.95 was the typical rate, but it seems that $24.95 is a lot more common now for a site with exclusive content.

Am I just basing this on a small sample, or are prices on the way up?

02-05-11  03:51pm - 5069 days #27
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


^MY ISP is Videotron and they added home phone service to compete against Bell so you actually have TV, Internet and Telephone service all sharing the same fiberoptic cables.
I haven't seen a slowdown in my internet or issues with my cable TV. The only conclusion I can deduce from this is that it's complete BS when these large corporation tell me that they have to charge more to prevent slowdowns. Just look at texting on cellphones. Not so long ago texting was free or really cheap. Companies realised just how much money they could make by charging for text because many people are texting instead of calling and today you pay a pretty high price for something that cost company almost nothing to manage.

It's a cash grab and they can get away with it because no one wants to do anything about it or they simply can't do anything about it.


I suspect that you're 100% right. The ISPs do it because they can. I hope someone can shed some light on whether the digital signal for TV is somehow different from the signal for internet.

BTW pat, I suspect that your phone is still over the old copper line. Going fiberop for that is probably a little over the top. Videotron may have told you you're all fibreop, but I'll bet if you looked you'd find an intact copper line in your home.

And one other thing pat: if you live in Canada and have Videotron as an ISP that means you live in Quebec. From any persepctive, and especially a porn perspective, Quebec is an amazing place. I haven't been to the strip clubs on Ste. Catherine in a few years, but there are few places on the planet as fun as Montreal. Vive la Quebec!

02-05-11  06:50am - 5069 days #23
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I know, I know, I'm probably dragging this discussion on futher than it needs to go, but I have a related tech question.

I have fiber op service that delivers both TV and internet. Aren't both just essntially the same data? If I turned all TVs on to HD channels and let them run for 24 hours wouldn't that use a ton of bandwidth? Isn't that the same data as I get from the internet? Or are they somehow different?

02-05-11  06:48am - 5069 days #22
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Kevin:


Well put messmer, I agree with you on all aspects. I just wanted to make sure that people understand that the recent CRTC decision and pending reversal isn't regarding our personal bandwidth caps like many believe.

The Canadian consumers need to keep fighting back to encourage the CRTC (or more likely the government) to take it a step further and not allow these large ISPs to impose caps on their customers.

Like you I pay hundreds of dollars a month for my internet service and I do not believe I should be capped (unless I was seriously straining the network). Canada is already years behind most other countries in terms of internet speed and bandwidth and this is only going to make things worse.

In Canada the same companies that provide television service also own the television networks. These are the same companies providing internet, landline, and wireless service. Next I think they will start buying the Canadian banks so they can direct access to our bank accounts too.

One example, Rogers Communications owns the Toronto Blue Jays baseball team (and their stadium). They also own the Sportsnet television network. A little while ago they launched a new channel called Sportsnet One, and proceeded to move all Toronto baseball games onto that new channel which other television providers (Shaw, Telus, Bell) did not have access to at the time.


You've hit the nail on the head. We're too complacent here.

I recall a couple of years ago when the Canadian dollar hit parity and then exceeded the U.S. dollar. People were wondering why U.S. magazines and books would have one price in U.S. dollars and a higher price in Canadian dollars. (Penthouse, for example - and I only buy it for the articles - would have a $8 U.S. price and a $10 Canadian price, when the Canadian dollar was actually higer than the U.S. dollar.) I heard some economist interviewed who tried to explain why that was the case but ultimately he concluded by saying that companies do that because Canadian are complacent and will just pay more.

Maybe we should burn some ISP members in effigy in downtown Toronto and see if we can get better service.

02-05-11  06:44am - 5069 days #21
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


The groups that should be putting increasing pressure on ISP to give their customer's more and more bandwith are the corporations responsible for music, TV and cinema. The way we are currently going. There won't be any music or DVD store left open in a few years. The advent of sites that allow customers to download music directly on their computer or portable player has already closed many music stores that thrived just a couple of years ago. These days music stores sales are probably higher from DVD sales than actual music. Video stores are also suffering because of the same reason.

When there aren't any music or video stores left because almost everyone is downloading from the net then you will see a significant drop in profit from all the providers of entertainment because regular folks won't want to pay the overcharge associated with downloading above their alloted GiG's of bandwith.


I couldn't agree more, pat.

At least one corporation has made comments on the negative impact of high costs (for the consumer) of bandwidth. Netflix has said that it is rethinking coming to the Canadian market. They have several issues here, but one of the biggest has to be the caps that most ISPs impose. It certainly is no coincidence that one of the major ISPs lowered their cap the day after Netflix announced it was coming to Canada. Do you think that it might have anything to do with the fact the the major telecoms are in competition with Netflix?

And just to reiterate, I'm not opposed to reasonable caps and I'm not opposed to user-pay models either. But when the ISPs charge consumers prices that are several hundred times greater than the cost that is simply gouging.

Imagine if high gasoline users were required to pay more per gallon or litre than lower users? I have a small car and pay $3 per gallon but you have an SUV becuase you pull a trailer and have three kids, and you have to pay $4 per gallon. I think people woudld find that unfair.

02-05-11  05:51am - 5069 days #21
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


So this seems to have some spit roasting to it. Wonder how I'll find it - these old titles are not easy to come by.


Down the Hatch shouldn't be too tough to find. It might be on the Diabolic site, but read the reviews of the site before joining. I had some issues with it when I last joined. It may be fixed now though. It's also available on several VOD sites, but those will have DRM. Adult DVD Empire does have the option of download to own, but that is still DRM protected (but unless they've changed, they'll give you three licences to either save or use on other computers).

On a semi-related note, I agree with what the first reviewer says when comparing Ashley Long and Angel Long. Angel is definitely the better looking, though I think they're equally dirty.

And while on the subject of Angel Long, I remember the first scene I saw with Angel Long. It was in Young as they Cum 4. It was love at first sight. The scene was shot in the second year of her porn career when she would be 22 though she looks 18. She does a pole dance clothed and then moves to a decent scene on a couch. Anal is included, which, for me, is a big plus.

And thanks to the miracle of them internets, I've just downloaded this movie from Adult DVD Empire. I have the scene as part of my collection, but it's just a digital capture from a crappy VHS so it doesn't do the scene justice. It'll be great to see it in better quality again.

02-04-11  12:20pm - 5070 days #17
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


Sounds more like a "splonged" chicken. I looked at SP1 on the IAFD webpage and the only scene in One that came close as reviewed by DEN was this:

5> Ashley Long. In kitchen. Poses/teases. No hands BJ for Erik & Jon. Screwing & no hands BJ in various positions. Anal & BJ. Clit solo. A2M. Anal & BJ. DP rev cowgirl, doggy. Open mouth facial. Swallows 9.30

That 9.3 is one of the highest I've ever seen Den give.

Or was it the one with Ashley Blue?

2> Ashley Blue & Jon & Mr. Marcus. In room. No hands BJ. Screwing & BJ doggy position. Screwing rev cowgirl. Screwing side saddle & no hands BJ. Anal side ways & no hands BJ & solo fingering. A2M. Anal & clit solo. DP rev cowgirl. Open mouth facials & swallows. 9.40

The 9.4 is the highest I've seen from Den.

Will look at some more from this series.


So Mstress K, r u saying that there is no girl cum? That's all just a pissant lie?


This might be the beginning of the long slide into senility... For me to forget a porn scene (even though I have thousands of them) doesn't happen often, but in this case I'm going to have to 'fess up to having screwed up. The scene I was thinking of was not Ashley Long in Spring Chickens 1, though to my credit I did get the model and the studio right. The scene is Ashley Long in Down the Hatch 9. I'm certain of that since I dusted off the drive that contains that scene and confirmed it. And it is with three guys, not just two.

Mistake aside, it's still a great scene.

Sorry for the confusion.

Now where did I leave my Geritol...

02-03-11  04:32am - 5071 days #7
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Not that this is exactly what you're looking for, but in one of the early Spring Chickens series from Diabolic (I think it is actually Spring Chickens 1) Ashley Long does what one of the male stars calls an "ass to mouth merry-go-round." She lays on her belly on a low thing like a footstool and each guy fucks and end and they change up every few strokes. It's a pretty hot scene from an excellent series.

02-02-11  06:31pm - 5072 days #12
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Just to be perfectly clear, I'm not asking for something and not willing to pay for it. If an ISP could charge a tiered rate that made high users pay a reasonable and proportional rate more than low users, then I'm fine with that. But setting low limits and then charging un-fucking-believable per GB rates isn't the way to go. Unless, of course, there is limited competition and what competition there is does the same thing. Then we, as consumers, just get bent over and fucked.

02-02-11  06:27pm - 5072 days #7
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I've spent huge amounts of effort trying to get members to maintain continuous memberships instead of buying occasional single months. Initially offering lots of features which could not be enjoyed properly offline. Then I found that having a considerable disparity between the first month and recurring months helps even more - so StripGameCentral.com's recurring membership is a mere fraction of the first month. Otherwise the loyal members who maintain recurring memberships end up paying more for the same content than those who signup 3-4 times a year. It wouldn't be fair on loyal members to let them suffer and it's certainly not good for the site.

I suspect this is why many sites find the pay-per-video/set model is very appealing as it gets around this problem completely.

I've just realised that the membership prices given on SGC's review here are badly out of date - I need to get that updated.


I'd definitely consider staying around a decent site I liked if the pricing model took into account that usage in recurring months would likely be lower. And I agree that it also acts as a sort of reward for the loyal customers. There are several sites out there that I'd really like to stay a member of for recurring months but since I'd be looking at the same price for a handful of updates I just can't afford to do it no matter how much I'd like to support the company.

And I also should say that until now I've never visited your site, Strip Game Central. I'll definitely be taking a closer look at that because with the quick look I had it is certainly something I'm interested in, and I am on the hunt for something new.

02-02-11  04:38pm - 5072 days #9
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I have no idea what I'm talking about here because I don't have a clue about the telecom business, but could some of this desire to cap and charge high fees on internet bandwidth to protect their traditional TV advertising revenue be similar to how the music industry completely blew the move to legally downloadable music. I think the music industry could have come out stronger if they realized that what peopel wanted was to get music in a format that they wanted, not in the format the industry wanted. The industry saw everyone as a potential pirate when I think it was just the consumers pushing for a better way to get music. And when the music indiustry dipped their toe into online music they fucked it up by pricing it like high art. Say what you want about Apple, but they forced the music industry into a better model and things are now looking up.

02-02-11  04:33pm - 5072 days #8
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


I don't blame you, many in this country are furious and feel rather powerless because there's not too much competition you COULD go to. It would be good to have something like you mention (refuse to subscribe to any service that has caps) to hold over the greedy .......s heads.

Trouble is, in my area we have Aliant, (who have already decided to take advantage of the CRTC ruling), and Eastlink, my present ISP. If Eastlink should decide to imitate the others there would be no one else to go to ... at the moment.


I have my service through Aliant and wasn't aware that they were planning to impose a cap. They do have a 'soft' cap in that in their agreement they say that the average household should use no more than 250GB per month. I could easily live with that. But if the cap is lower, people aren't going to be able to take advantage of the shift away from traditional TV to a more user-defined experience. But then I suspect that is one of the main reasons that the big telecoms want to push caps. Their traditional model is under pressure and they want to discourage people from leaving. One way is to make it too expensive to leave.

02-02-11  04:27pm - 5072 days #7
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by anyonebutme:


The cost of operation to send the 4gb to you is like 2 cents. The cost of the labor and materials involved in providing the internet connection out to your region, plus maintenance & upkeep, and service support, was millions of dollars of investment and yearly overhead.

Personally I think a pay per gb model is good. We don't have a flat-rate for electricity usage, you pay per the kilowatt-hour. If you use half as much electricity as your neighbor, you pay roughly half the price.

Why should the person who transfers 10mb per month for small email usage, be forced to pay the same price as someone who downloads 100gb of porn flicks?


I can't agree with your first point. I agree that the cost of the infrastructure is high, but it costs the same to run copper, cable or fiberop to my house whether I use 10MB a month or 1TB per month. My specific question is how much does the data cost?

I do, however, agree with you that the pay-for-what-you-use model makes sense, but only if it is priced reasonably. If you and I are neighbors and we both have the same service from the same ISP and you use less bandwidth than I do, then I should pay more, but $4 per GB seems a bit high if, as you suggest (and I suspect that you're close) the real cost is 2 cents. I think people would be pissed if electrical utilities charged a set price per kilowatt hour of electricity up to an average monthly use and then charged 200 times that for electricity above that average use. I could see society using that model for electricity to encourage reduction in use, but that cost model doesn't realistically apply to bandwidth.

To make a bandwidth cap model that made sense would also mean having a cap that made some sense. There is one ISP that has a cap of 15GB per month. You couldn't watch 30 mins a day of streaming without incurring additional costs with a cap that low.

Also, one beef I have with the capped model is that I'm encouraged to buy a service with faster speeds, yet if I have the faster speed won't I use it more? The faster services are priced higher and I presumed that part of that cost (if not ALL of that additional cost since the hardware is identical) is the additional bandwidth. So my ISP sells a 10Mbit service for $30/month and a 20Mbit service for $50/month. The hardware is the same, and the cap is the same? So what am I paying for?

02-02-11  12:38pm - 5072 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


I don't have an answer to your question but only the statement that I am totally disgusted with the CRTC for giving the go ahead for imposing a 40 GB Bandwidth limit on the average user with everything used above that being charged extra. In this day and age of YouTube and other streaming sites that amount would be very quickly used up.

Porn sites don't help either, an HD video from Reality Kings can be as high as 3 - 4 GB. I just fired off an inquiry to my local ISP (a cable company) who had promised me only last year that they would never impose limits and asked them to give me re-assurance on the subject.

If they, too, go the way of Rogers and Bell I will not only cancel my Internet Access but most of their extra cable packages as well. And that is a promise!


I agree about the CRTC issue. I read yesterday though that the CRTC has been asked to rethink the whole issue. I understand that the PM got a 200,000 name petition after the original boneheaded decision.

A porn buddy of mine recently switched ISPs and I strongly encouraged him to tell his old ISP that he was leaving because of the caps and make it clear to the new one that he was signing up with the because of their lack of caps.

It drives me up a wall.

02-02-11  11:16am - 5072 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


Here in the land of holy-fuck-it’s-cold-and-fuck-me-if-it-isn’t-snowing-again, otherwise known as Canada, ISPs really seem to get their jollies by imposing bandwidth caps. One of the biggest in the country, Rogers Telecommunications, imposes some caps and then charges (I think) $4 per GB of data used above the cap.

I’m not a techie, but I can’t imagine that in any warped world that a GB of data bandwidth is worth anywhere near that. My completely uneducated guess would be that a GB of bandwidth might actually cost the ISP a couple of cents. I realize that they may try to argue for high infrastructure costs, but charging for additional bandwidth doesn’t resolve that. And I’m sure it has absolutely nothing with the fact that this company is one of the largest cable providers and they don’t want to lose those customers to online viewing.

02-02-11  11:15am - 5072 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I realize that a lot can factor in to your consideration, but generally how long between when you download the last byte you want from a site until you’re pulling out your credit card again?

For me, I try not to overdo it, but I usually have a new site in mind as I’m wrapping up the current one. Most times I’ll try to hold off for a couple of weeks and spend some quality time with what I just downloaded, but admittedly, I’m as successful at this as the times growing up as a Catholic kid that I tried to give up porn for Lent. Usually with an hour or two of Mass on Ash Wednesday I’d be climbing the walls and have to dig out my collection of Hustler and Penthouse magazines. For the forty days of Lent, I don’t think I ever held out from porn for more than forty minutes. What I’m saying, I guess, is that with porn I don’t have a lot of willpower so I usually take a new membership pretty quickly after I’m done with the current one.

Anyone more impulsive or more selective than that?

02-02-11  10:56am - 5072 days #22
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


... to ride down Atlantic Ave and see their tan bods, glistening with suntan oil and the water droplets on their skin ...


Jesus, Khan! I'm having some blood-distribution issues here after reading that! And now my pants are getting too tight...

So I suggest a PU gathering at graymane's place!

02-02-11  10:53am - 5072 days #6
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
This may be a sign that I like porn too much, but hearing stories like Mistress Kent's seriously pisses me off. For those of us that appreciate all the work that sites and studios do (and that's probably the vast majority of regulars here) it is obvious that hackers and pirates are a serious drain on people creating new material. While I have on rare occasions shared a scene with a porn buddy, I did it more as advertisement than as a means to defeat a copyright. I figure if I can interest a friend in a site then he might send some business that way. It has worked in the past.

I think that tar-and-feathering would be a good start for these bastards. I'll bring the tar. Just call me.

02-02-11  04:12am - 5072 days #2
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Thanks for the cautionary tale graymane. I hope you're able to get any lingering issues resolved.

I'm like most people, I roll my eyes whenever I hear of someone being duped by a scammer and think to myself that I'm too smart to fall for something like that. But experience shows otherwise. Several years ago I got an email from my ISP. The message was that I had a virus and was spreading it from my PC infecting other customers and that unless I cleaned it off, they'd shut me down. For me, being shut down means no more porn, so I ran the attached .exe file. As soon as I clicked on 'run,' I knew I'd made a baaaad choice. That seriously screwed me up. My poor PC need professional help after that.

More seriously, I work with a guy who was duped out of $20,000 by a scam. I'd like to think that I'd have seen that one coming, and all the warnings were there, but I guess when we're in the middle of it it can be hard to see.

You might have the odd comment that you were a fool to believe this person, but I don't agree. Scams work by making us think that we're safe and they prey on the sense of trust that most of us have.

Good luck with this and I hope it doesn't impact too much on your participation here. I also hope that you're able to salvage your collection. If you do, you owe it to yourself to back it up.

Maybe a group of computer owners could take some vigilante action and tar and feather a known hacker sometime. Let me know if you catch him: I'll bring the tar.

M

02-01-11  01:47pm - 5073 days #17
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


You know, it must be a fairly popular fetish as I've seen movies where high-dollar clubs have a water tank behind the bar with hotties (skantly clad or nude) swimming about.


I gotta get out more. This sounds like my kind of place!

02-01-11  01:47pm - 5073 days #16
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


And I've seen so many naked bodies during my life time that undressed alone no longer does it for me.


I was raised Catholic though, so just plain nudity is a sin and therefore instantly arousing.

01-31-11  05:38pm - 5074 days #7
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


I know it's simply just me, but I've never understood why so much emphasis relating to women into titillation in porn is associated with water -- mostly involving long, tedious, boring, soapy baths, showers, hot tubs or whatever gets their bodies coated with H20. Don't know 'bout you, but it doesn't do a twit for me. Just a big waste of time.


I'm glad you recognize that this is just you. Hell, just reading the line "long... soapy baths, showers, hot tubs or whatever gets their bodies coated with H2O" made me need to have a wank...

01-31-11  04:28pm - 5074 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Hmm, looks like the natural porn evolution of synchronized swimming. If you ask me, it was bound to happen.



Too funny!!!!

01-31-11  02:12pm - 5074 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


Yes, I know that I can be accused of having some strange interests, but I'm not being judgmental here. I'm just raising this simply bacause it never occured to me that someone would create a site like this. But I'll be the first to say that this is pretty much 100% my fault for lacking imagination.

TBP recently reviewed a site called Underwatershow.com. It seems to have a pretty single-minded purpose: show nude women swimming as captured by an underwater camera.

Here's one piece of copy on the website:

Welcome to the wonderful underwater erotic world, a special place on the web for all lovers of the submerged female forms. The water reveals the real beauty of the woman's body. Girls are like hovering in zero gravity state. When they swim by the camera you'll be ready to dive into the screen and swim together with them.

I'd be lying if I said that this doesn't intrigue me at all. If the fee was less than $29.99 I might be writing a review right now instead of wondering about this niche.

Anyone else ever find a site and think, hmmmmm... never thought of that before, but it might be interesting...

01-30-11  03:28pm - 5075 days #35
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I'm always curious what all the hardcore self-proclaimed libertarians think when it comes to cases like Max Hardcore's--why is it the government's business what consenting adults do with their private sex lives and interests, including their porn viewing habits? Would current "libertarian" nutbags like Glenn Beck or Ron Paul give a damn what happens to someone like this as long as their taxes start to go down or disappear?

Or why is it that the 1st Amendment (covering free speech) is more open to interpretation than, say, the 2nd (right to bare arms)? How messed up is a society when sex and drugs are more scary, not to mention more criminal, than building a personal arsenal, or refusing medical insurance?

Just my own cynical but I have no idea what will happen now that Max is out. I hope for his own sake he just says "Fuck it!" and leaves this country for some place that doesn't have such a puerile interest in imaginary "morals" that are more about restricting freedom than instilling decency in people.

I don't like his movies that much either; they make me feel about the same way I do when I slow down to try and look at an accident on the side of the road--guilty, ashamed, yet somehow helpless. But these are really just my opinions, and seeing as he was all about testing, consent, and legally aged models I don't see what the fucking problem is. If he breaks into my home to drag some poor girl to piss and puke all over the carpet then I have a problem (well, actually a couple of problems) but until that occurs...grow up and try imprisoning some real criminals!

(I think this is a RagingBuddhist-worthy rant. )


I've come to a conclusion after reading what some of these hardcore libertarians write and hearing what some of them say. It seems to me that they push limited government for corporate interests but are still pretty happy with the thought that government can be used to impose a certain morality on the citizens. Here in Canada several years ago we legalized same sex marriages which sent the conservatives off the deep end. It was confusing to have heard them go on and on about smaller government but as soon as a so-called morality issue cropped up suddenly they weren't so libertarian. I had a modest proposal to resolve the issue if we weren't going to let gay people marry and have all the same benefits that I have: cut their taxes so they aren't paying for what we deny them. Of course that went over like a lead balloon with the morality crowd too.

On another Max related note, I was looking for a Max scene where he screws Summer Luv in a helicopter over Brazil. I googled it to find which movie it was in and instead ended up reading about one of the worst Max scenes that reviewers saw they ever saw. It had Max, Summer Luv and Catalina. I think it was one of Summer Luv's first Max appearances because she went on to star in many more. By coincidence, I happened to have the scene so I watched it. It is waaaaay over the top, even for Max. But the funny thing was that during the scene Catalina is vaginally fisting Summer Luv and Max obviously says something like "Yeah, fist that 12 year old pussy" but the word twelve (assuming it is twelve, but maybe thirteen or some other illegal age) is crudely overdubbed with a male voice obviously not Max saying "nineteen." It is so badly done that it is extremely funny. And then the puking starts in the scene and it pretty quickly ceases to be funny.

I'm a bit of a Max fan, bit only his older material where he was still creepy and still pretty hardcore, but was far from the batshit-crazy stuff he did later in his career. Hell, he even ate pussy in those older movies, demonstrating that he could decide to give pleasure to the starlet. His scene with Tammi Ann in Hitchhiker 1 still ranks as one of my all time favorites. That was also the first time I'd ever seen Tammi Ann and I was hooked at first site.

01-25-11  04:40pm - 5080 days #28
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I was watching a Max video last weekend (yes, I'll admit I'm a bit of a fan of some of his stuff) and I noted how he went out of his way, in a monologue before the action started, to remind the viewers that they were about to see acting. All models were legal, and all consented. Max is also the only director/producer I'm aware of who runs an ad telling people who are sexually active to be careful about STDs and get tested.

As much as Max creeped a lot of people out, i'm still convinced that he was targeted by the religious conservatives.

01-24-11  03:39pm - 5081 days #11
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I was also surprised to see that some webmasters pay attention to what we write. I reviewed FTV Girls some time ago. The site usually starts with the modell doing some flashing in public areas and then moves indoors for masturbation. There are some masturbation scenes done in public areas. I noted that the public stuff looked staged so it would be safer, and that brought the heat level down a bit. Within a short period of time the webmaster replied and said that there was nothing planned or staged about the public stuff. I took him at his word, amended the review and gave him a higher score.

In the same review I also noted that I'm not a big fan of solo girl stuff and the main reason I joined was for the public stuff. I praised the public stuff and recommended that anyone with the same interest would probably like this site. The webmaster wasn't angry at this, but his tone in a reply led me to believe that he didn't want to be catagorized as a niche site. I didn't get that sentiment. FTV Girls is a site that normally wouldn't be on the radar for someone looking for public nudity. I hoped my endorsement might steer some customers his way.

Still, I was surprised that he even read my review...

01-13-11  12:26pm - 5092 days #4
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I don't know if this qualifies as an answer to the question, but I recently bought a 50" TV and sometimes run my laptop through it. One of the first things I did was to play some scenes I downloaded from HD Porn to see if there was any truth to the HD hype. The answer is yes. HD is incredible to watch on a big screen. I don't do Blu-ray so I can't comment on that, though I suspact that it might be even higher resolution than scenes from HD Porn.

And I agree with GCode - it opens a who new dimension to see a model 'warts and all.' I really like that too.

01-12-11  12:25pm - 5093 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


... but one that was much appreciated by the staff.



I'm glad to give a compliment where it is due, Khan. But in fairness, the TBP staff really had to step in and help because they caused my problem in the first place. When they reviewed PornStar Network" and added it to their "What's Hot" list they used a picture of Katie St. Ives. I'm only a mortal!!! How can I resist her? You could have her picture in an ad that said "Katie St. Ives says 'Buy Khan's non-vulcanized extra-crappy tires for the low price of $500 each!'" All I'd need is the place to send the cheque...

But seriously, Katie St. Ives is hot... oops, I mean, thanks.

01-11-11  03:38am - 5094 days #4
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I know there's a market for this but I honestly don't want to see any virgin having sex on screen. The idea that any girl of any age chooses to get penetrated for the first time on screen makes me more sad than anything else.

Ah well it takes all kins to make the world


I agree, but I think here they're relying on a very technical use of the word 'virgin.' This young lady is probably more sexually experienced than women many years older than her.

01-10-11  03:27pm - 5095 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


Back in October graymane started a thread here wondering if we might see a trend in girls publically auctioning off their virginity. I figured that this was unlikely, and frankly thought the whole prospect a bit weird. (I don't mean to say that I found the thread weird, but the prospect of virginity going to the highest bidder a bit weird. Perhaps if I were independently wealthy my outlook would change.)

After posting my comments I gave it no further thought... until I checked my email today and see that Kink Live is hosting a live 'deflowering.' Yup... on January 15, 2011 at Kink Live anyone who is interested can whip out their credit card and watch the deed. I've been a member of several Kink sites at multiple times in the past few years, but Kink Live isn't one of them. But if it is anything like their sites that I am familiar with, the quality will be first-rate.

I have to say that I find the whole thing strangely arousing. I'm surprised that I feel this way. If I was able to, I think I'd sit in on this one.

To be fair, the model, Nikki Blue, is a virgin in the technical sense. She says her hymen in in place, and from what I read at Kink Live, they plan to show that it is as she says it is. The thing that lowers the creepy factor on this is that she isn't some recent high school graduate who has maybe given a few handjobs and blowjobs in her short sexual life. Nikki Blue seems to be in control and has done phone sex, video and picture shoots for Kink, and also live solo BDSM stuff too. She's used dildos on her ass, but never on her pussy. To preserve the market value, no doubt.

The setup seems pretty unique too, in that there will be three possible guys and the viewers will choose who gets the job.

If you're interested, there is an 8 min HD video of an interview with Nikki Blue about what she's about to do. I'm not sure if I can directly link to the page or not (here goes... http://news.behindkink.com/blog/ ) but if not, just go to Kink and look for "Behind Kink." The link is posted there.

01-08-11  05:33pm - 5097 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Admiral, I was never in the Navy. I was in the Army a couple of years (back in the 1960s, which seems like ancient history now).

So do your orders apply to me? Are they legally enforceable over all PU members?

Especially since you are stationed in Canada, which is a separate country from the United States.

That brings up an interesting question: Does your rank give you authority over all PU members, or just the Canadian members that are in the Canadian Navy (I assume Canada has a Navy, even though I don't remember ever reading about one.)

But it's positive you had a good response from the site, and that PU actually took an active role in resolving your problem. I agree with you that many porn sites seem to pay little attention to their members' problems, and often don't even respond to emails requesting help.

Wait: I found a picture of Canada's Navy. It seems to be a combined Air Force/Navy. That brings up another question: how do they get the airplane on and off the ship? Or do they just leave the plane on the ship permanently, and use it to fire bullets and rockets at enemy targets?

Canada's Navy:
http://www.dailyhaha.com/_pics/canadas_navy.htm

PS: I love their motto: "We get the job done."
Is that still the current motto?


Your reply is great! That put a big grin on my face. To tell the truth, I'm not in the Canadian Navy (and yes, we have one...). I've been in the Air Force but in sea-suuport operations with the Sea King helo. Canada has no aircraft carriers so relies on Sea Kings on board the destroyers and frigates. The Sea Kings are almost as old as you and are due to be replaced soon, but that promise has been made before. For land-based aircraft like the B-52 and C-130 you can get 50 years of service out of them (some of our C-130s are almost that old and are still in great shape) but when you put an aircraft at sea in the salt air things happen. I'm amazed you guys got as long out as the F-14 as you did.) I'm currently in the Canadian Army, but in what we call a 'purple' trade. Trades like clerks and medical assistants can wear any uniform and get attached to any unit or ship. Same with professions like physician, dentist, lawyer or padre. I'm one of those, but it ain't padre. I wear an army uniform but I work primarily with the Navy, though the Army comes a close second. The Air Force doesn't really need any of the professions since they don't really do anything.

Bottom line - my authority is limited. Mostly because my wife says it is. I've been aboard American ships in the past, and while I was saluted and called Sir, I suspect if I asked for anything other than the directions to the heads I'd be told to fuck off. Hell, I'd do the same.

Getting to the real business of this (short and unread) thread, I was very pleasantly surprised that I was treated as I was. Not to be insulting to anyone, but I've heard that PornStar Network is run out of Canada. I'd expect a company run from here (or the U.S. or many European countries or Australia) to have a real interest in customer service. When a company feels the need to head to the Cayman Islands or Cyprus I get a bit skeptical.

And finally, that pic you linked to is a hoot! The real motto is Ready Aye Ready, and for those with an interest in such things, last year marked the 100th anniversary of the Canadian Navy. Prior to that we sailed under the British flag.

01-06-11  06:24pm - 5099 days #4
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Yup, your pretty much right in your analysis there rearadmiral, there ain't so such thing as a free lunch. This topic got hashed out pretty good in an earlier thread here.


Thanks Wittyguy. I never thought to check the forum since I'm here enough that I figured I'd remember such a thread. I guess not...

01-06-11  04:44pm - 5099 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I don’t understand the financial workings of the internet. But I don’t understand a lot of things and I manage okay. Women, TV and automatic transmissions are just a few of those things. (I live for the first, tolerate the second, and avoid the last at all costs…)

But I have a theory about how sites like TBP make money and I’m wondering if I’m anywhere near correct.

My theory is this: if I go to a site that I see listed on TBP / PU then TBP /PU gets a bit of a kickback – a finder’s fee. It may be even more if I join a site through TBP.

Based on my theory, I only join porn sites through TBP. I take a one-month membership to Videobox twice a year and I don’t type “Videobox” into Google. I make it a point to go to TBP and join through them.

When I use VOD sites like HotMovies, Sugar VOD and Adult DVD Empire I do something similar. If there is a title I want to rent I go to IAFD and search it there and link through them assuming that IAFD gets a taste of the deal.

So am I right? Do sites like TBP and VOD sites get paid when I use them to spend money on porn?

01-06-11  04:43pm - 5099 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I joined Brain Pass / PornStar Network a couple of weeks ago. I had not joined earlier because a friend (and registered but not active PU member) had warned me that over half of the content was inaccessible without paying a further $30 fee. I joined on the strength of a TBP review that said the issue no longer existed because the site now gave full access to people who joined through TBP. The problem is that there was a glitch and I didn’t have full access. So I was screwed over by an unethical site again, right? Wrong. Much to my very pleasant surprise the webmasters at Brain Pass / PornStar Network took the issue very seriously and resolved the problem, keeping me informed the whole time. The staff at TBP were also involved and gave some excellent assistance and even contacted the webmasters too. Their issue was probably more general in that they had told people that there was a great value when joining through TBP and wanted to make sure that they weren’t steering people wrong.

I’m a cynic by nature and suspect that probably 90% of the people running porn websites don’t give a rat’s ass about customer satisfaction. I read reviews and comments here all the time that support that notion. Brain Pass / PornStar Network isn’t one of those sites: they worked to resolve the issue and keep their word that TBP users would have full access.

I’ll write a review soon, but my experience means that they’ve gone from being a really great site to being an excellent site. My friend and fellow PU has been informed of the change and encouraged to join again. I hope he does.

Finally, this was a perfect example of how great a site that TBP is. I honestly think that the Brain Pass / PornStar Network would have resolved this issue anyway, but it felt better knowing that the TBP gang was in my corner.

Thank you to all of you who made this a really positive experience.

And the rest of you? If you like DVD sites with a great mix of exclusive stuff, get your ass to Brain Pass / PornStar Network. That's an order from the Admiral.

01-01-11  07:12pm - 5104 days #5
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I would add something here about discovering a few girl/girl milk enema scenes that Evil Angel did, but some of you are sensitive about that so I'll just stay quiet.

01-01-11  07:11pm - 5104 days #4
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Hey, this is a good idea for a thread.

My favorite is the only scene of Jenna Haze at HDporn so far. The quality, the action, and the camera work make it very close to perfect, and I'm hard to please (I think). The belly-down boning near the end of it was fantastic!



Good-fucking-God that is an amazing scene! It ranks among my all time favs since I saw that. That scene alone is worth the membership price.

01-01-11  09:33am - 5104 days Original Post - #1
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada


I’ve had a membership for a couple of weeks and I joined after reading that the membership issues had been resolved. The issue, as you may know, is that BP/PSN has a tiered membership that requires an additional membership within the site. The review at TBP states that when you join through TBP/PU you get a discounted price and full access to the extra stuff. I joined through TBP and I haven’t had access to the extra yet. The webmaster replied to one of my comments and said it would be resolved, but it hasn’t been. They say that I’m the only person with this problem.

Are any other PornUsers current members of this site? If so, are you able to access the extra “Moviez” DVDs?

12-29-10  01:59pm - 5107 days #10
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I figured that this thread would be a good reason to add things up. I have nine WD passport drives ranging in size from 120GB to 1TB. Adding them all together I come up with about 4.2TB. That's 95% video and 5% pics. I could cheat and add in my backups and say i have 8.4TB, but that would be cheating...

12-29-10  01:53pm - 5107 days #13
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by JBDICK:


Aubrey Addams / Zuzana Zeleznovova (Tasty Tara) : Elisha Cuthbert


I've never thought of that before, but since reading it I think you're right. I've been a big Aubrey fan for a while (until she got the boob job ) and this tidbit of information will make me look at her in a whole new light. Thanks!

12-28-10  05:58am - 5108 days #2
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I'm not sure if this will be of any interest, but Evil Angel has a number of anal-themed titles where the girls insert billiard balls in their asses. If that holds any interest let me know and I can provide the titles.

And welcome to PornUsers. I think you'll find this an informative and entertaining site to hang around on.

12-23-10  06:22pm - 5113 days #9
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


rearadmiral, you want to be careful that when you fart, that's all that comes out.


It's all about control! I'm a man in control.

1201-1250 of 1453 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 24 Page 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.