|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
jook (0)
|
| 151-200 of 347 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | Page 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next Page > |
| 04-06-17 10:07am - 2817 days | #10 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User  Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
BECAUSE THE AVG AGE HERE IS 78 AND OUR BIFOCALS DON'T HELP ANYMORE. | |
|
||
| 04-03-17 10:45am - 2820 days | #5 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Ironically / coincidentally, it just happened to my response to your post, at least the first response. Can you see it? | |
|
||
| 04-03-17 10:44am - 2820 days | #4 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Not a problem and thanks for acknowledging that it is a site issue and not a mental health issue. I can wait another 5 years, take your time  . | |
|
||
| 03-30-17 01:16pm - 2824 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Hi Staff, The following problem has existed ever since I've been a member and I've seen others mention it. However, I'm a little confused. After posting something, in this case in the user forum, I got an error message. But the post appears to be there. However, when looking at the home page in the user forum, it doesn't show me as being the last one to post - as if I never posted. This has happened a bunch of times. I have to think the message (or when applicable, review or comment) is not appearing because I've never gotten a response to any of these phantom posts. Specifically, for the moment I'm referring to a thread I began, "Japan erotica." I had this issue when replying to iknowwhazzup. Can you tell me if it actually posted? I can see it using a different browser so it seems like it did post. Yet as mentioned, in the home page of the user forum, my reply doesn't show up. Whew, I hope I explained that OK. | |
|
||
| 03-30-17 01:08pm - 2824 days | #3 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Regarding the translation, it's almost worth joining just for that. It's laughable much of the time between the misspellings, grammar and nonsensical translation. Only the flagship site, Japan HDV has subtitles with the exception of some videos in AVidols. Lack of English never bothered me though. You can guess much of the time the gist of the conversation; besides, there's never much in the way of deep thoughts . | |
|
||
| 03-30-17 06:41am - 2824 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
I've got a few moments so I'll bore you and pontificate a bit on this subject, not that I'm an expert. What are your likes and dislikes when it comes to the land of the rising sun? Like it or not, it's vastly different than any other porn. That alone is a plus in my book. Admittedly, there is much I dislike or can only take in small doses. Stuff I'm mostly not crazy about... Hentai Bukkake and exaggerated group sex Some of the silliest plots imaginable Excessive use of toys Moans Hairy pussies More so on the plus side for me... Beauty and youthfulness of many models Seeming amateurism or at least the appearance of it Both the subservient and dominant models - they take it to extremes Some of the silliest plots imaginable (revisited) Generally a lack of piercings and tattoos Moans (revisited) What brought this subject to mind is being a bit more exposed to this erotica by joining the Japan HDV network, the best JAV sites I've come across. A caveat though - it is likely much of the videos are aimed at a western audience since there is no censorship. And one of the sites has English subtitles. On the same token, much of the porn has become westernized, though it's a minority. On the plus side of that is that I've come across more one-on-one anal scenes than any other JAV site, not that there are very many. Also rare, another favorite - FFM scenes which are truly FFM - it is rare to see the women in such scenes getting it on and is not truly FFM in my book. Lastly, shaved pussies seem more prevalent now. | |
|
||
| 03-21-17 07:49pm - 2833 days | #6 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Thanks Amanda. I agree with all of the criteria about reviews except mandating a certain number pros and cons in order to be a "good" or excellent" review. What if there just aren't that many? I don't like the pros and cons section at all, but that's another story. Some reviewers will find themselves grasping for straws trying to find non-existent or unimportant pros and cons. If I'm not mistaken, the TBP reviews don't meet this criteria for the most part. On another note, thanks for the raffle award. As others have said and I agree, the raffle is a great bonus and reward but not a motivator. I would write reviews regardless. And I'll continue to put in as many pros and cons as I deem appropriate. -)) Edited on Mar 21, 2017, 07:54pm | |
|
||
| 03-20-17 07:56am - 2834 days | #7 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Thanks to lk2fireone for the tip on not using unsubscribe. I've also had my email address since forever, since the inception of gmail. I only had 1 email address before that. Surprisingly, I don't get much spam. I say surprisingly cuz I buy a ridiculous amount of stuff online not to mention subscribe to a lot of different lists. Gmail is pretty good at detecting spam and the other stuff I just mark as spam. Having said that, some porn sites are relentless with emails. We should list the culprits, though in all fairness, I only got emails from sites I've subscribed to in the past. I don't mind it unless it's excessive. There was one that sent several offers daily. I marked it as spam and haven't heard back from them, at least in my inbox. | |
|
||
| 03-20-17 07:49am - 2834 days | #3 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Hello Amanda. As long as you brought it up, I wondered how the points worked. Can you point me to the link that explains it, or simply explain it here? | |
|
||
| 03-20-17 07:47am - 2834 days | #6 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Thanks Pat.I think the visual of that has cured me of porn forever. | |
|
||
| 03-17-17 11:01am - 2837 days | #4 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Perhaps I didn't explain the question well. First, I made a mistake. Some or all of the sites have been reviewed by TBP... no PU user reviews though. I didn't notice the TBP reviews until after my post. I'm not sure why I didn't see the TBP review for the site that enticed me to join prior to signing up. In my post I was asking, not very well I guess - how best to review? Should I do 5 separate reviews for each site or 1 review for the entire network? In any event, I decided that if and when I do the review, it will just be one review which will include a brief critique of each site. Many of the pros and cons apply across the board and would be repetitive in separate reviews. If they were vastly different sites in terms of format and structure, then it might be a different story. And the bottom line is that one joins a network for the entire content. In my opinion, in order to make an informed decision about whether to join, one needs to look at the entire site. | |
|
||
| 03-17-17 08:00am - 2837 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
My motivation in deciding to join a network site is generally based on the quality of all of the network sites taken as a whole, not individual sites. For example, I'd have no problem joining a small site, i.e., 25 videos with no updating, as long as there were more sites available. I'm guessing most people think alike. As it happens, I recently joined a site having no idea that I'd have access to all the network sites. I hit pay dirt, in my book anyway, in that there are several sites on the network which are fantastic and I did not expect access to them. As an aside, none of these sites have been reviewed on TBP. The dilemma. My thought is to do a review of the network as a whole and not one of each site. In the review, I'd review the main points of each site but not as comprehensive as if it was a standalone review of each site. This seems to go against the customary on PU where reviews are seemingly done of individual sites, not networks. Again, the point in doing a network review instead of a number of site reviews is that the decision to join, at least mine, is generally based on the quality of the network as a whole, not one site. This is getting too long-winded and perhaps I'm overthinking it. Any thoughts? [Btw, I am amazed that none of the sites or the network has been reviewed here.] | |
|
||
| 03-15-17 09:15am - 2839 days | #139 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Congrats to the winners and I think the winning reviews were highly deserving. I'd like to clarify something though. What days does the week cover? I believe one of the reviews was submitted yesterday, Tuesday. I would have thought that would have been eligible for next week's contest. | |
|
||
| 03-10-17 07:54am - 2844 days | #10 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
I am intrigued. I am a fan of vintage porn, particularly from the early 1900s. However, I don't understand what the different percentages of access or percentage unlocked means. I never saw that. How much is it to join for a month and have all content available? I'm guessing that this is the option that most customers will want, at least initially. | |
|
||
| 03-09-17 01:05pm - 2845 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Forget it Edited on Mar 09, 2017, 01:21pm (jook: stupidity) | |
|
||
| 03-06-17 12:40pm - 2848 days | #6 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Yes, the webmaster is looking for PU to do a review. And welcome to you, vintagepornbay. While we have your ear if you're still here, a pet peeve many of us have is not being able to make an informed decision about joining a site from viewing the home page. I did look at your site and frankly, I have little idea what kind of content is on there. Vintage can mean a lot of things. I would be hard-pressed to join a site unless, barring a detailed review: * Content was described * Downloads are available, though I think your homepage indicates only streaming. [You should reconsider that or at least offer an option to download at a different level.] * Price * How much content is available * Quality of content - in the case of your site, I would be a little concerned. If it truly is vintage porn, then I'm guessing the quality isn't very good. And that's certainly OK depending on the content. Btw, "vintage" to me can mean anything from early 1900s or earlier to 1980s. In any event, best of luck to you. | |
|
||
| 02-21-17 05:15am - 2861 days | #13 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Thanks for the clarification. I see that my bank offers such a card. | |
|
||
| 02-20-17 04:45am - 2862 days | #9 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Sorry to belabor this but I'm not getting it. Or perhaps such a card is not intended for my purposes. I simply want the card to prevent recurring charges (when a site won't cancel a subscription) and fraudulent use. Is it practical to reload the card with a small amount, i.e., $50, every so often for the purposes of joining a site? I would think there is a fee involved with reloading and that would make the cost prohibitive. | |
|
||
| 02-18-17 01:58pm - 2864 days | #7 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Sorry, I must be missing something. Why have a card with no money in it? To set the record straight, I'm referring to sites that have recurring memberships that for whatever reason, will not cancel a membership upon request. It is against credit card regulations to not allow cancellation. Reputable processors abide by the rules. Disreputable ones make it difficult or impossible to cancel. | |
|
||
| 02-18-17 08:04am - 2864 days | #5 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Gotcha, thanks. I guess I'll stick with my current habit of only joining sites that use trusted processors. | |
|
||
| 02-18-17 06:36am - 2864 days | #3 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
If you can be billed for a recurring charge if there's money available on the card, I don't see how it's practical. You'd have to keep the card funded under about $30 which seems highly impractical. Or maybe I'm missing something. | |
|
||
| 02-17-17 04:39pm - 2865 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Unless I misunderstood, it was mentioned somewhere here that using a prepaid card when joining a site prevented recurring charges. Is that true? Even if there is enough available on the card to cover the recurring charge? There seems to be only a handful of reputable credit card processors. I find myself not joining sites that aren't using a such a processor. I would like not to worry about such things as I'm sure we all would. If the above is true, is there a recommended card? I never used a prepaid card. | |
|
||
| 02-08-17 02:14pm - 2874 days | #148 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Mike, thanks for the detailed clarification. | |
|
||
| 02-07-17 07:16pm - 2875 days | #144 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
I guess I'm naive for not realizing the funding aspect until 3 years after I joined. Like I said, I understand (to a degree) the economics of the situation. I don't understand why it's not made clear and why a direct question couldn't be addressed. While you may be, and probably are correct that the reviews are unbiased, this does not mean this will always be so. More important to me is the point I brought up before. Sites may choose not to be listed because of bad reviews or for fear of such. It is not fair to the consumer, you and me, that sites will not be listed because they choose not to. I would rather PU be a truly independent site supported by member contributions and that all sites are subject to scrutiny. If this is not economically feasible and I'm smoking too much funny stuff, then PU should simply be open and state the realities. I'm sorry if I am rocking the boat and it is not my intention to do so. My guess is that PU staff don't make a fortune and the site is well run. I'm simply advocating full disclosure. | |
|
||
| 02-07-17 04:58pm - 2875 days | #142 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
I'm sorry to say but the apparent reluctance to answer my question regarding whether this site is funded by the porn sites it lists gives the appearance of bias towards those sites. Frankly, I wouldn't care a great deal if that was the case if it was transparent. Hopefully, this is not the case and my fears are unfounded. | |
|
||
| 02-06-17 10:05am - 2876 days | #2 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Pat362 recently did an excellent review on Hot Movies and gave it a good rating. I've been a member off and on for centuries, or so it seems. There's an incredible number of videos, good quality except for the old ones, diversity and good customer service. Not cheap as is the nature of streaming sites, but worth checking out. | |
|
||
| 02-05-17 06:54am - 2877 days | #138 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
This is an honest question, though perhaps naive. Why should any site be prevented from being reviewed despite being in a foreign language, not approved for listing by the site, etc? Is PU dependent on contributions from the listed sites? I don't mean to sound contentious though I realize there's no tactful way to ask such a question. However, I think the membership should be aware if PU's decision to list certain sites and not list others are somehow affected/tainted by contributions by the sites. Like so many others, I enjoy this site and find it immensely helpful. However, the question raised has been on my mind for a long time but I didn't want to create any discord. Regardless of the answer, I will continue to support the site the best I can (by reviews, etc.) Thanks. | |
|
||
| 02-01-17 04:35pm - 2881 days | #134 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
I think you need an assistant! Or make a spreadsheet or some other program listing all the requests and followup. As for the PU policy to only post reviews with the consent of the webmaster, I vote you guys take it up for discussion at your next board meeting. -) | |
|
||
| 02-01-17 04:28am - 2881 days | #130 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
I'm going to try posting this again, the executive summary. My messages usually disappear into outer space and it's extremely frustrating. I figured this was the case with extasy. But I don't get it. Why should a site have the final say on whether they get listed? If I was a site owner that had bad reviews (or in extasy's case, an unsavory reputation), I would opt not to have my site listed. However, that doesn't serve the interests of the end user. | |
|
||
| 01-29-17 01:54pm - 2884 days | #21 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Thank you, you read my mind. I was too lazy to elaborate though. Not to digress, but can someone tell me how to find hot Asians to work in a spa that I plan to open? | |
|
||
| 01-27-17 01:59pm - 2886 days | #126 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Amanda? | |
|
||
| 01-27-17 01:57pm - 2886 days | #17 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Quite a bizarre thread | |
|
||
| 01-24-17 04:34pm - 2889 days | #125 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Hi Amanda, Any update on this - extasycams? Just curious. Why do you guys need to reach out to the site? It seems that diminishes objectivity. Or perhaps I'm naive about these things. | |
|
||
| 01-07-17 09:00am - 2906 days | #10 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Pyrennes, thanks for the info. They both look like they're up my alley. I checked the sites and rearadmiral's excellent reviews. Correct me if I'm wrong, but they seem very similar except for the formula. Per the admiral, https://www.wakeupnfuck.com/ seems to be dated. I also have little time for downloads these days and am concerned based on admiral's complaint about file sizes and download speed. If you were to recommend just one, would it be Woodmancastingx? Thanks again. | |
|
||
| 12-28-16 11:32am - 2916 days | #6 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
It should be noted that I did not say I enjoyed the Japanese zaniness though I do like the hot women. The bukkake stuff becomes ho hum after a while too, but still, you have to admit it's off the beaten track. The only site that I can cite is 88 Square. I gave it a so-so review several years ago. I'm not sure if there's that much of it on this site, but Japanese porn often includes many subservient, degrading and incestuous scenes. I find such scenes interesting once in a while. I know others may frown on such things. However, I have no problem since it's all acting and I certainly don't condone such things in real life. I have some other Japanese videos that I downloaded long ago though I don't know where I got them from. I wish I did. They're longer videos (30+ minutes) with involved plots. One such film involves a domineering out of this world goddess and the control she assumes over a range of people. I felt like I was watching a movie, not a video. In any event, the point I was trying to make was that to an extent, the Japanese are not as formulaic as seemingly everyone else. However, I didn't mean to imply that I liked most of their off-the-wall stuff. My wish though, is to at least see some other sites try to employ such originality. Edited on Dec 28, 2016, 03:03pm | |
|
||
| 12-28-16 06:08am - 2916 days | #4 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
I'd like to see more artistic and imaginative direction and scenes. In my mind, that is the biggest drawback of the vast majority of sites. Porn has almost become one big yawn, for me. Seen one, seen 'em all... within each genre that is. Perhaps this is a fantasy and is not realistic. Then again, the Japanese seem to have come closest to producing innovative stuff. | |
|
||
| 12-26-16 12:17pm - 2918 days | #11 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
AS for the legalities, I couldn't care less. It's no different than the late 90s and early '00s with music. Remember Napster (before it became legit) and Kazaa? Just like attaching all sorts of rules to legitimately purchasing music didn't work and only got people pissed off, it doesn't work with videos. To this day, I'm still pissed at Apple for being among the last holdouts to DRM and music and I never buy from iTunes. Then again, Apple has a fistful of my money from their other products, sigh. Having said that, I don't download streaming movies. It seems like a PITA. The only programs I know of require that you stream the video to the software. A 20 minute video takes 20 minutes to download. Unless I've come across the wrong software. | |
|
||
| 12-24-16 05:46am - 2920 days | #2 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Very interesting about the Wal-Mart prepaid card. I wonder if the same applies to any pre-paid card. A word of caution with discounts. I've come across two sites in the last week that claim to offer holiday discounts that are not very good deals. I'm sure there are plenty more. Creampie Thais - check the comments section about their discount which includes an incredible back and forth with the webmaster All Japanese Pass - just today, I received an email offering 90% off. Of course, they inflated their "non-discounted" prices so much as to render the discount almost meaningless. With the discount, a monthly recurring subscription costs $19.95. To add insult to injury, if you click the back button, there's a popup offering another 15% off. The only subscription that you get close to 90% off is with a 2-year subscription. Good luck with that. Too many shenanigans for me, particularly for a site I'm not overly interested in due to the censorship. | |
|
||
| 12-09-16 04:13am - 2935 days | #113 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Hi Amanda, Can you please add extasycams.com? It's been around a long time but seems to fall off everyone's radar. | |
|
||
| 12-06-16 05:53am - 2938 days | #5 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Thanks for the comments. Maybe I'll give czasting a shot. I wonder though, are the European regulations more liberal than in the US? Don't get started on reality TV! Does that mean "Survivor" is not "real", haha. We need to go back to the golden age of TV - Allen Funt and Candid Camera. | |
|
||
| 12-04-16 06:03am - 2940 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Do any truly exist or are they all fake? I doubt there are any "real" American reality sites due to prohibitive laws. [If that's not an oxymoron, I don't know what is.] However, several sites outside the US seem truly real. I wonder though. I'm specifically thinking of Czech Casting. Any thoughts? There are several Asian sites which I reviewed which I believe aren't fake, at least not completely. These mostly belong to the VD network, Trike Patrol, Tuk Tuk and Asian Diary. There are a few others but the quality is beyond awful. It's a popular genre and one I like, but the vast majority are too phony baloney to even attempt to use one's imagination. | |
|
||
| 12-01-16 04:31am - 2943 days | #9 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Super, thanks for the comment. No, I don't use a hotspot. I use Verizon FIOS which is supposedly superior to cable. However, the download speed limit in my building is 50mb, though that's pretty decent. Speed tests show I get about 45mb. Don't get me started about Comcast. I used to use them. Then again, it seems there's a universal law that all cable / optical companies compete to see who can offer the worst customer service. I won't belabor that discussion, though I could go on and on. Having said that, I think there may be a problem with FIOS handling the downloads. It's not only large downloads. I recently had an issue with a 540p download. "One thing you can try is switching your DNS servers to Google's or Open DNS's. They are usually much faster than whatever DNS servers are available through your internet provider. There are simple instructions to do this on a Mac." This is beyond my technical expertise. I don't even know what it means, haha. Who would I ask about this? | |
|
||
| 12-01-16 04:23am - 2943 days | #4 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Amanda, thank you! Mystery solved. I left a comment in the link you provided. lk, thanks for the suggestions. Yes, I have looked at those sites and decided against joining. I may reconsider though, particularly Blacked and Tushy. X-Art seems too soft for my taste. After some more thought, here's what I like and look for. - Reality, though not fake reality if that makes sense - Asian or Latina shot on locale (I find most American and European sites / women too jaded) - Amateur - Hardcore including some anal and 3somes - Decent camera work and some variety in scenes I think my wish list is just that. Having all these qualities is not an easy task to fill. I haven't found such a site yet. I've been settling for sites having only 2 or 3 of these criteria. The sites that come closest are the VD sites I previously mentioned, i.e., Trike Patrol. | |
|
||
| 11-30-16 11:47am - 2944 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
It seems I don't like virtually anything in the way of videos any more. Not that I don't like porn, though almost every site leaves me yawning. It's like, been there done that. The purpose of this rant is to ask for suggestions. If you want to suggest I take up a new hobby, that's fair. I don't like the vast majority of stuff on the mega sites, those with the huge networks. I don't like the Cali stuff. I find all of that stuff is generally lacking in excitement and originality. I don't care how young or old the models are. On the other end of the spectrum, I don't like extreme gonzo stuff, i.e., Kink, Rocco S., Evil Angel, etc. I hate sites with tat'd wimmin. What used to be my favorite sites I now find a bore. That is, the Asian reality sites owned by Video Dream, i.e., Tuk Tuk, Trike Patrol, etc. They do have potential but every scene is the same. They need an infusion of new blood in the way of actors and camera men/women. Surprisingly, what I did like lately is a site I joined because of a Skeet pre-check, bastids. I stupidly got pissed off over $1.10 [!!] and had Epoch refund my money. Dumb move. However, they left my trial open for a day and I ended up downloading a few videos. What a weird site. It has 3 genres - casting, teens and Japanese. What a combo. They're all somewhat bizarre but with young and good looking women. It's bang.com - I couldn't find a mention of it anywhere. Then again, it's hard to google - you can imagine what you come up with when googling bang.com. Try it. I guess I'll fork over the $20 and give them a shot out of desperation. In any event, I'm not leaving you much of a clue in order to give me a recommendation - I can mostly only say what I don't like and that seems all-encompassing. Sigh. | |
|
||
| 11-30-16 10:26am - 2944 days | #113 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Very cool! Thank you Amanda. Are you still sending prizes? | |
|
||
| 11-30-16 10:24am - 2944 days | #7 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
There you go again RA, making me open my dictionary As far as I can tell, IDM only works with Windoze. I'm a Mac guy. I'm still having issues. I am trying downthemall, but it only seems to download 2 or 3 files at a time, albeit large files approaching 3gb. I did find a well-reviewed DM for Mac - FOLX. But alas, I get error messages. From what I can tell, the premium version (not free) may only work with premium sites. I'd spend the money but not without assurance it works. The other distinct possibility is my Internet connection. There's no reason I should be having this problem with 3 browsers and that is, only getting partial downloads at times. But I guess I have to live with it until I either fire Verizon or get a new computer or both. And both of those options are distinct possibilities. | |
|
||
| 11-28-16 12:32pm - 2946 days | #4 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Thanks! IDM appears only to work with Windoze. I tried downthemall. It worked! But alas, another browser to get accustomed to, though it was one of the first browsers I used in the Pleistocene epoch. I'll probably only use Firefox for downloads since I'm so accustomed to Chrome and Safari. I'll reply back here when I've had a chance to use downthemall more. I just tried it out with one video and it worked fine. | |
|
||
| 11-28-16 05:20am - 2946 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
This is one of those questions I felt was too dumb to ask. However, I'll discard my ego for sake of sanity. I never used a downloader mostly cuz I can't figure them out. However, I'm having lots of problems using my browser, Chrome. I intermittently only get partial downloads and it's starting to happen more frequently. Verizon FIOS suggested I try a downloader and a different browser. I use a Mac if that matters. Can someone offer suggestions? Like, recommending a downloader and a browser? And not to push my luck, give brief instructions on how to use it? stoopid jook | |
|
||
| 11-27-16 07:26am - 2947 days | #5 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Hey lk2, I think we have the same birthday . I saw your post before Amanda's post. To add a reminder and word of caution. Be careful of pre-checked stuff. I let my guard down and Team Skeet got me for $1.10 for bang.com, bastids. However, Epoch agreed to refund the charge. Edited on Nov 27, 2016, 07:44am | |
|
||
| 11-26-16 02:09pm - 2948 days | #3 | |
|
jook (0)
Active User Posts: 325 Registered: Dec 22, '13 Location: jersey city |
Terrific! Thanks. | |
|
||
| 151-200 of 347 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | Page 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next Page > |
|
