Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: PinkPanther (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1136)  |   Threads Started (88)

101-150 of 1135 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 Page 3 4 8 12 16 22 23 Next Page >

03-20-19  07:24pm - 2103 days #11
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Have a good time. I was only there once in February 1981 or so. I don't think it was a good time for the U.K. There was this intense melancholy everywhere in England of "empire lost". The English food was horrible. We went for Pakistani food as much as possible, which was readily available and pretty good. Luckily we were only in England for a few days and then we went to Ireland, which was awesome no matter where we went. Irish people can take a sunny side up egg with toast and make it feel like a real treat, and they're funny and generous and all that good stuff. Anybody I know that's been to England more recently has really enjoyed it.

03-19-19  07:20pm - 2104 days #11
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Yes, Anette Dawn's stuff is still part of Twisty's, 66 scenes, according to the site.

03-18-19  10:35pm - 2105 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


This is one that I know was at one time listed. It was one of my favorite sites.

www.pacinosadventures.com

(Edit)

I joined the site last night. I am pretty sure there is no new content even though it says there are weekly updates and shows the newest update. Having said that, the deal you get for $29.95 is very good.

Pacino's Adventures is a cleaned up, new version of that site. You have to click on "Pacino's Network" to get the other sites. These sites look just like they did 3-5 years ago. But those solo sites were $30 each at one time.

You get Pamela Spice, Natalia Spice, Gigi Spice, Taylor Lain, Tania Spice, Selena Spice, Cierra Spice, Bella Spice, Mariah Spice, Spice Twins, multi-model La Zona Modelos and multi-model Pacino's World plus Pacino's Adventures.

On a rough count, I am counting around 2,000 scenes between all the sites. Those are about 99% exclusive amateur models.

I am guessing it's not really updating based on the newest videos being 720p but as an archive site of hard to get content, I don't feel bad about paying the full price for no updates.

Considering the overall lack of Latina sites these days (under 100 at TBP/PU), this would easily be one of the top ones.


Do any of those sites update any more? Pacino was brilliant at one time in finding incredibly hot Central American models. And a lucky sumbitch at fucking many of them.

03-15-19  08:43pm - 2108 days #9
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Watching gay porn would be out of my comfort zone.
I haven't done it yet.
I'm afraid that at my age, I might find it erotic.
I remember watching some trans videos a while back. The trans models were attractive.
I found myself confused.
Is a trans male or female or something different?
But there are some attractive trans models out there.


the discussion about whether watching trans porn means that you must be bi or gay or non-straight in some kind of way is rather endless. I've seen trans porn performers go on rants about how anybody could claim to be straight and get turned on by performers with penises is just denial on their part. Personally I'm not going to put labels on anybody else. It's for each person to label themselves or not, far as I'm concerned.

I would say that if you've watched much boy/girl porn, you've seen pretty much everything that you would see in gay porn. You've certainly seen a lot of guys's naked bodies, including their penises, you've seen a lot of blow-jobs and probably some rimming and other such stuff. And if you've watched trans-porn, then you've seen guys fuck other human beings that have penises, so that's one more thing that would not be new to you in gay porn. It's really just a matter of whether you're attracted to the performers or not.

Back in the 70's, there was a big gap in production values between straight porn and gay porn, because I don't think that a lot of the gay porn audience gave a rat's patootie about production values. But these days when the ability to achieve pretty good production is basically the cost of an iPhone, and with gonzo being the main form of porn period, that gap is pretty much gone.

03-14-19  09:26pm - 2109 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Every once in a while I see a gay male performer that turns me on - Liam Riley, Jae Gorgeous, Landon Vega, a couple of the guys from Teen Boys World - but they're few and far between so it's like any other site where you've gotten all the excitement you're going to get after a handful of scenes - eh.

03-12-19  08:02pm - 2111 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Yes, looking at that photo of Dee - I've seen many pics of college age athletic women in that kind of clothing at FTV - then they get naked and masturbate and they like when girls masturbate with really large dildos or out in public, etc.

FTV has lots of sample sets posted all over the web, so it should be pretty easy to get a sense of what they offer, and they also have lots of inexpensive promos these days - $19.95/month or so.

03-11-19  07:52pm - 2112 days #9
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


It is sad that we rarely see webmasters with Shap's dedication, anymore. He would come up with 2-3 new ideas, test them and if they weren't doing good, he would come up with 2-3 more new ideas. I remember that time when he posted to tell Twistys members they have access to Nicole Graves solo site and Anette Dawn's solo site. Someone thanked him and he replied, "The login pages are working for all 3. My tech guy is on vacation so I guess I will let you all have them for free!" I try not to be too hard on Mind Geek, business is business but I don't know why they don't try to have just one site rep to talk to the members and get some feedback.


More than that, they are openly hostile to member feedback. They did away with the Twisty's forum not long after buying the site. They did away with Brazzers' forum after they heard too much complaining from members. It's "give us your money or go away" for that crowd.

It's very true how rare the Shap-like webmasters are. I remember one time I had been locked out of the site. I complained to their Customer Service - they gave me a "looks OK on our end" response, which helped me not at all. I posted here and Shap took up the issue personally. He found that, since I have Comcast, I was the victim of an over-active security system that was denying access to thieves that were using their Comcast accounts to steal Twisty's login info. He skipped dinner with a porn star to solve my problem. He was awesome.

03-10-19  09:29pm - 2113 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Awesome photos of Riley. It's great to see how popular and successful a thoroughly girl-next-door beauty has become in an industry where so many women believe that they have to surgically remake themselves. Hopefully more women will learn from Riley's example and leave the plastic surgery to medical necessary uses.

03-04-19  09:43pm - 2119 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


That's interesting. Are they still going to have solo content or did they not say?

I can't say I ever downloaded a straight hardcore scene from Twistys. I streamed a few and thought they were too cookie-cutter. I would like to see them improve. It's hard to believe I once gave them a 99 here on Porn Users but my last review of their site was an 80.


When Shap was running it, and it felt like they were doing everything they could think of to make it better and better every day, and when they had crazy amounts of updates per day, plus licensed content, and live shows, they probably earned the 99. It's still not a bad site. Perhaps they decided that it will stand out more distinctly in the MindGeek universe as a lez-only site.

02-26-19  08:19pm - 2125 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Another good porn-related interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlny98rh3h0

Besides having done some very cool scenes as a director, and even more as a performer, Erik Everhard is probably one of the most intelligent multi-faceted people in the porn biz. Good interview, though I'd like to muzzle the guy who keeps dropping in the comedy clips.

02-23-19  03:39pm - 2129 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I was a big fan of August Ames while she was alive, and continue to enjoy her scenes after her death. To me, it's like enjoying Basquiat's artwork after his death. I don't see a reason not to continue to find August's porn work to be erotic after her death. What is hard is watching "shoot" interviews. ALS Scan posted a BTS interview with her - and she was so happy and joyful, I couldn't watch more than 30 seconds without breaking down - still can't.

02-22-19  08:09pm - 2129 days #8
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
The weirdest thing about the "I don't pay for porn" crowd is their astounding lack of understanding that it costs anything to produce porn, while they have a great appreciation for their own costs in compiling it and sharing it. You'll see people who run pirate and file-sharing forums jumping up and down to exhort members to join the download sites that pay them a kick-back (or claim that they will - "amazingly" they often fail to do so), posting about "don't you guys know what it costs to keep this site up and running? If you value this site, get your credit cards out!" Or people who post in various forums will cry incessantly if they're not being praised for their posts of pirated porn - "Don't you guys appreciate the effort and time that goes into what I do for you all?" - while NEVER exhorting those people to join the sites that actually produce the porn that they're posting.

It's a bizarre world.

02-22-19  07:47pm - 2129 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
There are various ways to pay for porn, and a lot of people who claim not to pay for porn are paying for porn. For instance, people who populate pirate and file-sharing sites. Those files aren't free to download - at least not with any kind of speed - so a lot of people who wouldn't give their money to companies that produce porn are instead giving their money to companies that charge to easily download pirated and illegally shared porn. Then there's the cost of storage for downloaded porn. While portable hard drives and other storage devices have gone down in price significantly, they still have cost, as well as the internet providers and the computer manufacturers. Put it all together and the whole "I don't pay for porn" thing is a bunch of bull-shit. It's really a question of "who do you want your money to go to?"

01-23-19  08:38pm - 2159 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
It's crazy what you can get for your porn-spending $ today as compared to when the internet was a newer thing. Many porn sites are spending a lot less money than they did back then - doing less shoots, doing less expensive shoots, recycling older content, etc. But the volume when what used to be many separate sites are bundled together as one in many cases, makes up for it.

01-19-19  07:07pm - 2163 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
There must be different versions of Adult Time. I got a 1-month join and I don't find it to be the most exciting thing in the universe. I'm definitely not seeing 100+ sites.

The gold mine I discovered, for my tastes, is PornHub Premium. ALL KINDS of content, much of it downloadable - solo=girl tease, glamour stuff, gritty amateur stuff, hot Asian porn, bikini contest footage, compilations of hot celeb scenes, lots of scenes from premium sites, often slightly edited, as promos to get you to join their sites. The stuff from premium sites is usually stream-only, but that's fine.

But as to the original question, yes, I definitely have at times.

01-17-19  07:27pm - 2165 days #14
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I would imagine Yahoo groups are next to go. There are still a number worthwhile ones still active, amazingly enough, given how much Yahoo tried to kill them off.

01-16-19  07:21pm - 2166 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Holly Randall has 2 generations of porn knowledge - her own and her mom's - and her podcast is one of the least cheesy porn podcasts you can find - and she has really good guests. Her interview with Stormy Daniels during the height of the clamor about Trump was particularly good:

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/holly-r...y-randall-unfiltered

One caveat - if you're looking for someone that's blasting the porn industry, you won't find that here. Holly tends to like the porn industry and to regard it pretty positively.

And another porn podcast that I've found to be really interesting is Asa Akira:

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/asa-akira/the-pornhub-podcast-with-asa-akira

I particularly thought her interview with Christian - ex-Naughty America producer, among other roles - was fascinating, given his tendency to say exactly what he thinks about everything.

01-14-19  08:18pm - 2168 days #13
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by jook:


I'd say tattoos are more popular than ever. They're even more popular in many other parts of the world, i.e., Europe and South America. Personally, I still hate 'em unless it's minimal and tasteful.

You didn't expand much on "alt" sites and I'm not exactly sure what is meant by that. For me, 2018 was a break from traditional porn and paying sites. I've groaned before (along with many of you) how repetitious and boring porn sites have become. As a result, I went searching for alternatives.

For the past 6 months or so, I've been mining one of the last vestiges of the wild wild net. Not the darknet, though that qualifies. But is also a minefield where only the knowledgeable and brave should wander. I'm referring to Usenet. It's a forgotten and unused place by most and has existed since 1980. Things haven't changed all that much.

It's a PITA to search, video quality is often the pits and it's as disorganized as it was in 1980. However, there's some excellent and, more important, different stuff to be found, mostly by amateurs. The cost is minimal - I think I paid $100 for a year with no download limit. Price was not the motivation though. The thrill of coming across some great and different stuff was my only motive.


Usenet reminds me of bit torrents - 2 elements of the more pirate aspect of the porn collecting world that I am far too lacking in tech aptitude to figure out . Hell, I can't even figure out how snapchat works.

01-11-19  08:03pm - 2171 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
According to this CNN article dated yesterday, it's not known at this point whether or not there is a pre-nup or post-nup and Bezos owns 16% of Amazon, at most, she would own 8%, which is hardly a controlling interest. She could certainly vote with her shares differently than her ex would like, but the "this is going to change Amazon completely" speculation seems unfounded:


https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/10/tech/jeff...ce-amazon/index.html

01-09-19  06:48pm - 2173 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Misty Gates is a solo-girl model that I liked quite a bit that did less and less with her site as time went on. At a certain point, she added voyeur cam as an extra to membership to her site. That was cool, getting to watch her hot nekkid ass as she put on make-up, or did dishes, etc. Then the voyeur cam became the only element of her site that actually updated, which was lots less cool.

Voyeur cam as a thing in itself - eh. I just don't find too many people all that attractive, so searching for the cams of the people I find hot would be a chore. Voyeur cam for particular porn babes - more interesting as an add-on, not so interesting as a thing in itself.

01-06-19  05:21pm - 2176 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Megan Rain's back with new boobs. So far I've only seen her promoting OnlyFans type stuff on her twitter, but I would imagine that she'll have new scenes before too long.

12-12-18  08:19pm - 2201 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Awww - the Riley vid was evidently too hot for YouTube - gone.

Thanks for sharing it with us, though.

10-13-18  12:39pm - 2262 days #17
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
So Morgan Lee hasn't been very active in porn lately, she turned her attention to fitness modeling and music. But she announced on her Twitter that she was back to doing stuff for her Only Fans page - and at $9.95, I figured it was worth it to check it out. My conclusion: Only Fans pages are basically for fans that want to give porn babes money for not much in return. Morgan Lee's Only Fans page refers to 80 videos. The videos that I have checked out so far - and I haven't checked out all 80 are shot with cell phones. So in that sense they are exclusive to the Only Fans page, but they are not high quality, high def videos. Some of them are very short tease videos. Some of them are scenes split up among several shorter videos, the longest of which I've seen was about 3:30 so a 10 minute scene might be chopped up into 4 or 5 shorter videos. So 80 videos listed in a porn star's Only Fans page probably going to be 20 or less "scenes" plus short tease cell phone videos of less than 1 minute - the sort that you would see posted to a porn star's Twitter or Instagram. The same thing goes for the pics that the Only Fans page lists. If the Only Fans page lists 14 photos, that doesn't mean 14 photo "sets", that means 14 photos, and the photos are again similar to what would be posted to Twitter or Instagram. You'll also receive offers via email to "unlock" other videos. While Morgan's Only Fans page was $9.95 for a month, the offers that I have received so far include an offer to unlock a video of less than 3 minutes for $15 and an offer to unlock a video of less than 1 minute for $4. Plus you can tip additional.

So if you want exclusive cell phone type videos of a particular porn star, subscribing to their Only Fans site might be worth it to you - just be aware of what you'll be getting for the price. Are the videos downloadable? No, but there are probably video-capture apps that are available to download anything that streams. Are the photos downloadable? No, but like Instagram photos, you can use a snipping tool to download them easily.

There are probably sites that have lots more material of whatever porn star that you're interested in than their Only Fans site. Cherry Pimps, for instance, has dozens of Morgan Lee scenes, some of which are hour-long cam shows along with photo sets of dozens of photos. And I've seen Cherry Pimps's memberships at $9.95 for 1 month for the entire site - and all of that material is high-quality, high-def and easily downloadable.

09-26-18  04:43pm - 2279 days #8
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Also:
My guess is that a lot of the Porn Hub content is provided by sites for promotion as free advertising.

Otherwise, Porn Hub would be constantly sued for piracy.

Am I being naive?


Not being naïve - a great deal of the content on Pornhub references the original site, encourages joining the original site and is blocked from downloading by the original site.

09-14-18  04:51pm - 2290 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


He was one of those "average guy" character actors that the porn industry is always going to need - got to perform with lots of hotties, and apparently appreciated the opportunity to do so. Sounds like he was a genuinely cool human being. RIP, Kyle:

https://avn.com/business/articles/video/...ses-away-799034.html

09-14-18  04:12pm - 2291 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I'm buying physical media as seldom as possible these days. Once in a great while, I'll like something enough to want to have a physical copy. For instance, there's an absolutely amazing film called "Dawson City: Frozen Time" that I plan on buying the physical DVD of some day so that I can have the extras, etc.


But, for 99% of the stuff I want to enjoy, whether it's music, film, pro wrestling, porn, TV, etc, streaming is the way to go for me these days - and it's really inexpensive as compared to buying physical media in the aggregate.

09-12-18  05:46pm - 2292 days #16
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


The biggest problem for me would be finding a model I know, who is still active! I have been meaning to look some of these OF pages up but life keeps getting in the way. Do you know if the OF sites are ran by the models?


So far as I know, the answer is "Yes". Of course, I'm just guessing since I'm not behind the scenes, but it seems that the same person/people that are handling the particular porn performer's Twitter account is handling their Only Fans site.

09-07-18  02:47pm - 2298 days #9
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Christ Jesus Fuck... I would end up fired or in jail if I was one of those co-workers...


It would be difficult to resist sexually harassing Sadie Pop, wouldn't it?

09-06-18  03:00pm - 2299 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Sadie Pop makes reference in her Twitter posts to having coworkers. The way that she makes the references makes me think that it's a non-porn job that she's talking about, but I don't know for sure.

08-29-18  09:09pm - 2306 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


This topic can be listed as proof that if you move from California to the east coast, you end up working way too much! I had to look up the Only Fans on Google. With my current job, I have a Twitter but it's university-affiliated, so no porn on it.

I would be interested in these type of sites. I used to join solo model sites that I knew weren't going to be worth what I paid but at least I got a new group of content featuring the model. I think the best example was Lana Lopez's solo site. It received terrible scores and I could see why. Most of the picture sets were from other sites and the ones that weren't were candid/clothed. But I kept digging around on the site and found a webcam archive that had 89 webcam videos (near an hour each) of Lana talking, stripping and masturbating.

Does anyone remember the old Yahoo fansites that some porn stars had? Would have been mid to late 90s, early 2000s. It looks like these Only Fans pages are like those.


I don't remember porn stars having their own Yahoo fansites. I remember there being a huge number of Yahoo porn fansites and porn fan groups - some of them general, and some of them focused on specific porn stars or companies - and some of of the people who ran them would reach out to the porn stars or companies so that they could claim to be the "official" porn fan group of that porn star or company. There were all kind of weird rivalries and feuds between people who spent a lot of time and energy running these groups.

But the stash of webcam vids that you describe above is exactly the kind of hidden jewel that I bet you would find on some of these Only Fans sites, while others would probably not have much of value.

08-29-18  09:03pm - 2306 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I've got to say that one of the most depressing porn comebacks I ever saw was Bunnie Bleu. I was a big fan of her early nymph-look scenes - got to see her live when "Beverly Hills Exposed" came out and she looked even better in person.

When the shift from film to video porn happened, I stopped paying much attention for a while, because everything looked like such shit, then one day I was wandering around a porn shop to see what was new and I happened on a new Bunnie Bleu video featuring her new gargantuan boobs. I found it so sad and so dick-dampening. I left the place and it was years before I ever watched one of her newer scenes - I think the first time it was jut included in one of the endless Vivid compilations.

08-27-18  01:05pm - 2309 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


Well, Bonnie Rotten is back – and her cumback scene at Brazzers is a pretty loud statement that she’s back in the same crazy-ass form as made her so beloved by porn aficionados in the first place.

It makes me think of other notable porn star comebacks.
Shelley Rey had a brief career as a pretty, fairly vanilla porn babe in flicks such as All American Girls in Heat and California Valley Girls. I was always happy to see her, cause she was freaking gorgeous, but she wasn’t a particularly notable sexual performer. Then she came back re-invented as Debi Diamond, and holy fuck, she was a whole different animal. She was one of the most sexually aggressive porn performers of all time, game for anything, including being gang-banged in gravel (not my favorite scene of hers, but I've got to say that she looked hot even being gang-banged in gravel).

Careena Collins similarly was fairly vanilla in her first run, prior to law school. I liked everything she did in her early career, all the Jerome Tanner stuff, and the orgy scene in BabyFace 2 with Careena Collins as the bride-to-be getting fucked to hell and back by Jamie Gillis’ drunk stripper/demon is one of my all-time favorite porn scenes. But Careena Collins post-law school was a chip of Debi Diamond’s block. I’m not a fan of her most intense scenes, because I’m not turned on by women being beaten up for fucked while their face is forced into a toilet. But she did a ton of incredible stuff for Bruce Seven & Bianca, including her amazing double-team scene in Takin’ It To The Limit 6 – another of my all-time favorite porn scenes.

Then there are porn stars like Lisa Ann, who come back in I-still-got-it mode, not really adding anything to their repertoire, but looking good and giving solid performances.

08-26-18  05:11pm - 2309 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


While I don't disagree that it would be nice if there were reviews of those sites/pages. The fact is that it's not really necessary for the below reasons.

1-You can't view any of the content? That by far is the most obvious way to know that it's content that is almost guaranteed to be a disappointment.

2-The performers almost never talk about what they have shot for their Only Fans "OF" pages and that is another great way of knowing that whatever it is. It's not good.

3-Most new performers(if you can really call them that) have an "OF" page and they aren't necessarily just charging the basic 10$ but significantly more. Best example is Hannah hays who barely made a blip in the industry and she charges 25$ for her "OF" page. 22 photos and 7 videos is all you get for that 25$.

4-This one is basically philosophical. If it looks too good to be true then it probably is. If the content was out of this world then the people who own "OF" and the performers themselves would be screaming at the top of their lungs about all the amazing stuff you can get for your money.

I tend to spend significantly more time on another forum and this very subject came up recently and the general consensus from people that have joined a few "OF" pages is that the vast majority of them will be a huge disappointment


All of the above is a good reason for me why reviews would be helpful.

As you say, the prices being charged for these sites are premium prices, averaging about $25 for a month.

There are many of these sites that are sporadically updated, or barely updated at all.

This sounds to me like the reason porn site review sites became popular in the first place. We currently live in the era of bargain prices for porn sites - most with plenty of content can be accessed for $9.95-$19.95 for a month if you know where to look for discounts, including of course TBP. But back in the day, porn sites such as Pix-and-Video and 1-By-Day were charging $25.95 for a month with no network, no bonus sites included and it was very helpful to see reviews to know which sites were and were not worth joining before throwing in that kind of money.

There may be some jewels among the OnlyFans sites. If so, I'd be interested in knowing about them as a result of reviews.

08-22-18  05:47pm - 2313 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


With almost every working porn star creating their own OnlyFans sites - and with the sites themselves being positively opaque to non-members - no information beyond the number of videos, number of photos and the price - it seems like there's a real need for reviews of these sites - how often are they updated, how long are the videos, do the photo #'s refer to individual photos or photo sets, what is the quality of the material, etc.


Anybody seen any such thing? I haven't.

07-10-18  06:41pm - 2356 days #13
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
It is something for the administrators of this site to pay attention to - and it could be a partial explanation for the limited participation in this site. If those of us who have been here forever and a day are having our posts to the forum, our reviews, and our poll responses gobbled up - all of which is the case - it's pretty damned guaranteed that newbies are experiencing the same thing - and the general rule of thumb is that very few people ever complain about such things - the rest just move on and participate in sites where all of the above are not happening - or rarely happening.

07-09-18  08:57pm - 2357 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Damn! I spent 20 minutes or so doing a write up of my 5 favorite scenes - posted it and it disappeared into the ether. Trust me. It was good stuff!

07-09-18  08:06pm - 2357 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Both had the same basic attributes of a great core group of interacting characters and great timing in the way the material was presented. I really like the vaudeville-like style of performance that both came out of. James Brooks, who directed Frasier, is known for having directed by sound without looking at the action. His theory was that if it worked as "radio" - the sound alone, it was going to be successful TV. He was definitely proven correct on that score.

Which series was better? I dunno. Frasier leaned to having more well-rounded characters, especially as the series went on, similar to Big Bang Theory. Seinfeld was interesting in being committed to having the characters continue to be shallow, self-absorbed shits - proving it in spades in the final series episode. Seinfeld was also interesting in having the central character be the least talented actor on the show - and surrounding him with such incredibly good actors & having such great writing that it didn't really matter.

Both shows - and others such as Big Bang Theory = are great comfort food TV - perfect for streaming an episode before going to sleep.

07-06-18  12:33am - 2361 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I remember seeing "Blazing Fuschia" at the Pussycat Theatre in Santa Monica, CA - things definitely popped

05-31-18  05:14pm - 2396 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


I thought this interview that Asa Akira did for her podcast with Christian XXX is pretty fascinating. Christian's unique in having been able to do pretty much all branches of porn - gay, straight, TS (both fucking and getting fucked), BBW, etc - and he has always been unflinchingly straight-forward and honest.

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/asa-aki...asa-akira/e/54576152

05-21-18  05:20pm - 2406 days #18
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I've really enjoyed the Marvel Universe movies, for the most part. The newest Thor movie was enjoyable, but had problems of "tone" - it kept trying for Guardians-of-the-Galaxy type humor, which didn't fit with Thor for me at all.

I love the Guardians movies. I hope they don't mess them up.

05-18-18  05:16pm - 2409 days #14
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I've got to say that this was the most depressing superhero movie I've ever seen. I don't mind a movie where SOMEONE I like dies - but it seems to be a new trend where film-makers are killing off tons of the good-guy characters. This is happening on TV shows too, like The Crossing.

Maybe it's a response to The Trump years.

04-19-18  05:27pm - 2438 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I never understand why people wait so long after an incident to file suit - in this case 17 months, which is nothing compared to some of the suits that have been filed in the sports world and in pro wrestling, where suits have been filed decades after the incidents, usually thrown out by the courts.

04-17-18  05:55pm - 2440 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
it's an art to die well. Elvis was a complete mess in many ways, but he left things clearly enough that his family was able to maximize the value of his estate.

It's amazing that with that model showing what's possible, I can't think of a single other deceased celeb where that's gone on - no matter how many international fans they have.

03-18-18  05:12am - 2471 days #14
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
The OnlyFans sites that I have looked at have a pretty clear listing of the number of updates - how many photo updates, how many video updates - but no information as to how extensive any of those updates are - are the vids 3 second glorified gifs or several minute long scenes? No idea. Are the photo updates 1 pic or an extensive photo set? No idea

Given the pig in a poke nature of the OnlyFans sites that I have looked at, I haven't joined any of them, just as I would never join a traditional porn site that was so lacking in transparency.

It seems to be a way to appeal to the super-fans that just want to give money to their favorite porn stars. It may well be that some of the OnlyFans sites are actually woth something.

If there were PU members that were willing to take-one-for-the-team and join some and review them and let us know which ones had extensive content and which did not, I'd certainly be interested in those reviews.

A "review" that disses the whole concept based on experience with 1 pornstar that isn't even named is utterly worthless to me. I have no doubt that SOME of the OnlyFan sites are just an excuse for super-fans to give money to the porn star in question without getting much if anything back.

03-13-18  04:53pm - 2475 days #8
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I recommend PornFidelity/TeenFidelity. you can probably see their promos around to get a sense of their style to see if it's up your alley.

02-14-18  06:35pm - 2502 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
AsiaMoviePass is decent. ActionJAV is a site that is regularly updated and has a HUGE collection of authentic pixillated full Japanese movies. They mainly stick to the milder side of Japanase porn - not much bukkake or teacher-hunting type stuff there.

JSexNetwork is also decent. They are not as regular in their updates as ActionJAV or AsiaMoviePass. One day might be 3 updates, might be 5 or more or might be zero. It's easy to check their history of updates. They also have a pretty sizeable collection. If I remember correctly, they have a small number of uncensored movies in their collection, but you would have to search by the pornstar to find them. They used to have a fair amount of Attackers movies and other hard stuff - there were a couple of really crazy Maria Ozawa movies that I remember them having in particular.

02-14-18  06:27pm - 2502 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I think it's really cool. Evil Angel is a great company that helps their directors get the most out of their work. I like that Lisa Ann is making clear in this article that she's not going to be trying to be anything other than what she is - "I'm not going to be shooting golf balls out of my ass. Evil Angel fans are going to have to love me for me." If, at the age of 45, she were feeling the need to turn herself into some MILF version of Debi Diamond, that would be sad.

She's a smart woman business-wise and if she needed the money, well she picked the company to partner with that will give her the most bucks for her banging. Good for her and good for Evil Angel. I wouldn't be surprised if fans of Lisa Ann new to Evil Angel found some stuff to like amongst Evil Angel's catalogue - they might want to start with Dana Vespoli's more relaxed stuff.

01-18-18  06:32pm - 2529 days #30
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Personally, I think the issue is micro-reviews vs full-fledged reviews. exotics4me is an example of someone that always does in-depth reviews, whether he is reviewing a single site or a site that is part of a network.

Reviews like that have a lot of value, in my opinion, and if he chooses to review other sites in the network in the same way, well that's even more valuable info for people who are considering joining that network.

Then there are reviews where there's very little info - one line under pros, one line under cons, one line under summary.

Personally I don't find those reviews to be very valuable - perhaps they're being done to just have a better chance at the raffle prizes, perhaps the person thinks that's a good review. I dunno. I just know that reviews like that don't have a lot of value for me. Personally, if I have one line to say about a site, for whatever reason, I'll post a comment.

There's not enough activity on this site overall for me to encourage the mods to set definite standards, nor do I think it's a big problem. There's just reviews that I find to be valuable and reviews that I find to have very little value to me.

01-15-18  05:04pm - 2532 days #9
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I'll confess to have read through this thread and I'm confused as to what you're looking for.

I think a bisexual site could work but, as pat says, it is a narrow niche, though I don't think it's as narrow as pat posits.

I don't actively go looking for bisexual sites so I'm no authority on them but I currently have a membership at Mile High Media and they have a bisexual site as part of the network. It has 130 scenes and is updating. I don't recognize any of the models but they appear to be Eastern European.


Yeah, looking more around the internet, I see that there are a few sites out there where the participants are enjoying the sex, as opposed to the Cum-Eating Cuckold site, where the orientation is that it's humiliating for one guy to suck another guy's cock. So I guess the real answer to my original question is, "Yes, they work - they just don't have a very big audience."

01-15-18  04:57pm - 2532 days #8
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


Well it's tiny when compared to b/g or lesbian porn and that was the thrust of my statement. I'd also like to point out that in fact there is very little TS porn being produced. As far as I know Kink's two TS site and the odd Joey video on EA is about the only place where you can find a regular amount of TS porn. There is a market for that kind of porn but it is so small that few sites would be able to survive if more of them tried to produce more of it.


There's crazy amounts of TS porn being produced. Grooby is the company that owns the most porn sites and they've got a dozen or more. Devil's Film puts out quite a bit TS porn.

There are sites focused on Brazilian TS, Japanese TS, Thai, Philipina, there are probably a dozen major Ladyboy sites, etc.

Then, as I say there are an increasing # of higher production sites, such as TransAngels.

101-150 of 1135 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 Page 3 4 8 12 16 22 23 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.1 seconds.