Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: PinkPanther (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1136)  |   Threads Started (88)

1051-1100 of 1135 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 21 Page 22 23 Next Page >

01-03-09  12:56pm - 5831 days #12
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I don't have any particular "give me the finger" fetish nor any particular aversion. It's just another cute "attitude" shot and it can be a hot pic or not depending on all of the other aspects of the pic

hotness of model
clothing
lighting
posture
vibrancy & clarity of pic
lack of excessive pic treatment

ALS Scans frequently posts behind-the-scenes stuff that they say are more to give people a feel for the reality of actual shoots than for erotic value. Now if I were a one-month member of the only site that had ever done behind-the-scenes stuff, this would be fascinating to me on that level. I've been a member there for multiple years now and there has been a lot of behind-the-scenes-of-porn-shoots stuff out there now, so to me whether I like the pics and vids or not has to do pretty entirely with "are there hot babes that are turning me on."

They frequently do hotter bts shots that are never really intended for publication than other sites do with their most posed expensive shoots, for my tastes.

01-03-09  12:46pm - 5831 days #19
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
It had to be scene with Brigitte Kerdove, who is top on my list of most cock-deflating porn performer of all time (well, not including the dwarves and other such circus porn types). I watched some of her stuff because she was compared to Debbi Diamond and Careena Collins, who I love, but yuuuuuucccchhhhh!!!

01-03-09  12:43pm - 5831 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Here's the thing, though - while most networks make this easy, some - 21st Sextury - make it more difficult by varying access depending on the "Join" site.

With that network of sites, it would be more cumbersome to do what you suggest than it would with most.

01-01-09  09:13pm - 5833 days #23
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
If you've got an active imagination, pics have that limitless element where you can think about all the things that could develop out of the pic. I'm more a pic fan than a vid fan for that reason.

12-31-08  05:34am - 5835 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
There are definitely shellackers at Met Art, but the site that pisses me off more than any other is Twisty's. They get more "name" models than any other site and I can't find pics of many of them, such as Andi Valentino or Jana Jordan, that they haven't blurred and shellacked to absolute shit.

Then I go on ALS Scan's site yesterday and see pics posted in the Director's Blog - candids of Kacey Jordan that were never meant to be posted, according to Alex, that blow away anything that's been on Twisty's - well, ever.

Vibrant, full of life, gorgeous pics of a beautiful young woman.

Thanks for the suggestions, all

12-30-08  07:11pm - 5835 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I like professionally done photography of hot women - name or not. ALS Scan is my fave site because he does very little treatment to the pics and makes his models look great with lighting, make-up, etc. I'm wondering what other sites I could be missing in that vein, though they don't have to have the "young shaved" niche of ALS Scan

12-30-08  05:30pm - 5835 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


I could hardly be any more sick of the tendency to too much filtering/photoshopping/painting/altering, etc of photos. It makes me wonder why they get "name" models, except to advertise that they have pics of someone that they're identifying by that name, when they've messed with the pics so much that you can't find one that doesn't make her look like 3d art and they could have saved money by just having an open casting call and done the same thing to pics of whatever reasonably attractive woman showed up.

So my question is: what are the sites that have the best hot pics of actual women where they aren't shellacing/ painting/ photo-shopping/ filtering the pics all to hell?

12-18-08  11:45pm - 5847 days #14
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I like the ALS Scan public nudity stuff. It's a little adventure and the girls seem to have fun and the crew has a good time doing it and the people around the action have their reactions. It's fun. It's not like they build their entire site around it - They do public nudity bonuses about once a year - either painted or not. Billy Raise is a gorgeous girl and the last woman they did it with was a delectably painted Susanna Spears doing one of the lightest shoots of her career and looking just awesome.

I wouldn't join a site that was all about public nudity, but I do like seeing girls doing outrageous shit in public - I like it in my personal life as well and have some friends that are flat out crazy and will do hilariously kooky things in public and look hot doing so.

12-13-08  05:13pm - 5852 days #6
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Good point on Suze Randall - her site continues to be quite good, exclusive, though they license their stuff all over the place, and very inexpensive - you can find incredibly good deals for their sites.

12-13-08  09:35am - 5853 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
SexyBabes.tv is a network of sites, including babelicious.com and dreambabes.com & eurobabez.com. This is all licensed material, so you may have seen this material posted on other sites if you have membership to other pic sites, such as Twisty's.

Twisty's network is also heavily pic-oriented.

The 21st sextury networks of sites lean heavily toward the pic content, though they also have vids - if you join lower rung sites on the network, such as MandyIsKinky.com, you get immediate access to more of the high-quality network sites quicker, then you have access to 2 more every month that you remain a member. Most of the best quality content, aside from the content on SweetSophieMoone.com, originates on ClubSandy.com & PixandVideo.com

12-11-08  07:42pm - 5854 days #17
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Sarah Blake and Nella - one of Alex's absolute fave models ever - both got boob jobs for the same reason - despite their success with their natural bods, they continued to be dis-satisfied every time they compared their own chests with other girls. Diddy of Didilicious just did the same and Brittany of Bratty Brittany & Brittany Avalon is planning on following suit when she can afford it.

Oh, well - much as I like small-chested babes, I think Nella looks pretty great with her new boobs, Diddy looks cute as ever too.

12-11-08  07:37pm - 5854 days #6
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I like it! I'm pretty happy to have a 650 MB 1-By-Day video showing up out of the blue at ALS Scan the other day. And if 1-By-Day posted a similar ALS Scan vid, I would imagine that there would be some happy 1-By-Day members as well.

It's a smart thing to do and I would imagine that the sites then are affiliates of each other and make money on the joins that are identified as being a result of those postings. Karen Dreams has done this for a number of years. Her whole "bonus" section of her site is sample galleris from other sites - her members get cool material, other sites get the exposure and not only isn't it a cost to her, but she makes money if her members like and join the other sites. Considering how many stupid business people there are out there, I'm always happy to see smart ones - and this is smart stuff.

12-03-08  07:50pm - 5862 days #37
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I check PU once a day, usually, and often just hit the "comments" area, browse through to see if I've got anything to add and do the same with the "reviews" area. About every other day, I'll do the same with the forum.

So I spend a GREAT deal more time looking at actual porn than I do at this site.

12-03-08  07:45pm - 5862 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


Dunno why, but I started thinking about porn ethics today and thought this would be an interesting topic for this forum, since it could be approached from so many directions.

Certainly there's been discussion about how "rough" is acceptable - many her express dislike for the Max Hardcore "treat 'em like vile whores" school of interaction between the male & female performers.

Then there's the question of consensual vs non-consensual interaction - there's a number of sites out there that purport to be sneaky pics at beaches, etc, whether they are or not.

But I was most interested in the ethical decisions that we porn users have available to us. With the internet what it is, there are a lot of forums that post links to get material from just about any kind of site that you want. Especially in the land of bit-torrents, there are "full site rips" available without too much searching, but even if you're too low-tech or lazy, like me, to get into the bit-torrent world, there are site rips available - and other forums that purport to have usernames & passwords available for many sites for free. There are a lot of people posting in those forums that take the position that you'd have to be a moron to pay for porn.

So why do it? Why pay for porn? Why join sites in ways that involve credit card transactions instead of just joining forums that brag about having all of that material for free?

Personally, I don't claim to be "pure" in my decisions in this area any more than I am in most areas of my life. I'll drive over the speed limit if I feel like it and feel no qualms. I obey traffic laws more strictly if I feel that I'm going to pay a price for not doing so - but on an ordinary basis I drive carefully because I don't want any injuries to befall me and I don't want to injure anybody else - not just because of the expense, but because I'd feel like shit if I did injure somebody else by my negligence.

In terms of these forums that are all over the place, I check them out and I'm not above downloading stuff that I want to see, but I also join the sites that I find consistently exciting - because if people are doing a site that's going to be consistently exciting to me, as far as I'm concerned, they deserve to be paid for it. There's a matter of self-interest in wanting them to survive and prosper so that they keep going and keep on presenting the exciting material - and understanding that they need money to do so - and there's an ethical factor that, to me, if someone's doing consistently exciting work, I don't want to rip them off. I want to pay them for what they're doing.

I don't feel bad about using these forums to check out material and see what the quality is like, but I don't want to feel that I'm ripping off the sites that are great, from my perspective - and I'd feel like more of a moron for taking their stuff for free than I do by paying them.

On the other hand, I'll also do what I can to find the best prices available, including prices lower than the currently advertised prices. Google is a great tool to just put sites' names in and see what comes up and see what prices are being advertised with what comes up - sometimes you can find prices $5 or more off the currently advertised price or the best price available through TBP or other such sites - just because old links sometimes still work fine - and I've got no ethical problem paying the lowest price that I can find to join.

Anyway, that's my long-winded rant to start off this topic. I'll be interested to see if others have any thoughts on this, including from some of the webmasters that post around here every once in a while.

12-01-08  07:04pm - 5864 days #32
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I get your points, Rick - and it's absolutely true - Femjoy's price has been rather high historically, but now they have "specials" every few months - so if TBP was going to be changing your rating to take that kind of stuff into account - and it's becoming common with many sites - you would have a hard time doing much else.

It's part of why it's worthwhile to have both TBP with the pros reviewing according to set standards and trying to be as objective as possible along with PU, which allows more for the subjective factor and a lot of wrangling.

12-01-08  04:05am - 5865 days #28
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Personally, I can't take price out of the equation when grading a site because a part of grading a site is assessing the value - and if I were to compare 2 sites that had very similar amounts and style of content and 1 had a price that was $10/month higher than the other, you can bet that if I were grading both of them, I would give the less expensive site a higher grade, because it's a better value - and a better value deserves a higher grade, regardless of whether TBP wants to use it in their reviews or not - and I'm not knocking their decision to take it out of their criteria. I'm just not taking it out of mine for the reasons stated.

11-27-08  10:04pm - 5868 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
While I think this discussion is fine, I also think that it's illogical to ask for objectivity when judging sites that have so much connection to sexual tastes. People are going to give high marks to sites that turn then on. People are going to give low marks to sites that fail to turn them on or frustrate them in other ways - poor navigation, poor quality, poor customer service.

I think that the Comment section on reviews is a good place to wrangle over the grading and other issues and gives other users a better idea of how reasonable the reviewer is being.

Personally I haven't given a "No trust" rating to someone, but I recently made it clear, I hope, that I didn't trust the rating of a reviewer who reviewed a network of sites, said that he would have given 1 portion of that network a 75 on its own and liked other parts of the network as well, and then gave a grade of less than 75 to the whole network - that's not reasonable to me.

PU is good at giving guidance to reviewers and I think that people that stick around get better at using that guidance. That's good and we all should encourage new members to use the guidance in order to do better reviews.

At the same time, it's important to have the input of as many reviewers as possible and that's going to mean a lot of new people giving very high scores, most likely, to the sites that they love.

11-22-08  06:44pm - 5873 days #12
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Is there a busy prostitution scene in the US? Oh, hell yeah! I live in the Bay Area, which is as much sex central as any place in the country and prostitution is regarded as a victimless crime and not very aggressively pursued. There is a very well known local strip club that is basically a brothel. There are massage parlors all over the dang place that only get shut down when there is a complaint about sex slavery or underage girls - other than that, ollie ollie oxen free. There is a street prostitution scene that is pursued enough to keep it within certain limits, though there is a well-known local forum where people can discuss all elements of the local "provider" scene including street prostitution at all hours of the day and night. The escort scene is VERY active. Escorts advertise everywhere. Many dancers at many strip clubs make themselves available for outside entertainment. The touring porn star scene isn't as active as it was 5 years ago, or so, but it's still active and some porn stars are available as escorts as well.

And if all of that isn't enough, there are sites such as Body Miracle.com that advertise the availability of porn stars and adult models for escort interaction. Here is Body Miracle's site:

http://bodymiracle.com/default5.html

The prices on this site are crazy - the "going rate" for the highest-priced escorts in the Bay Area is 1/3 to 2/3 the prices showing on this site. I was delighted to see Tammy Ann listed here, just because I'd heard a number of years ago a report that she had passed away - and while that was regarded as an unconfirmed report and one to be taken with multiple grains of salt, I hadn't heard anything about her since - so it's good to see that she's alive and spreading joy.

11-22-08  06:32pm - 5873 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I miss Roxanne Gallo, who quit at her peak of perfection, and the Bucci Twins.

11-22-08  06:31pm - 5873 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Jana's also got her site, which has been going consistently for years. Adriana Sage is her webmaster - it's a very well-done site. I tried hooking up Stephanie Swift with Adriana, since they are both in San Diego and Stephanie's site has never been professionally run, but apparently Stephanie didn't want to go there.

Jana C was doing some BJ b/g stuff in her web cam shows but her webbies and her members didn't like her doing b/g so I don't know that she will be doing more.

11-12-08  09:16pm - 5883 days #34
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I do think 3D/Virtual Reality porn is the next big thing - the people who do those Virtual Sex DVD's were trying to get a system going. I would love to put on a headset and feel like a hot gorgeous girl was in front of me, letting me see her from every angle I wanted and move her as I wanted.

Until then I think the interim next big thing is going to be natural bods/absence of photo-shopping - at least I freaking hope so! I am so sick of the photo-shopping/painting/shellacing of pics of great looking women!

11-07-08  11:44pm - 5888 days #22
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Here's the thing about the 21st Sextury Loyalty Program - you can't compare the Loyalty Program that you got from one site with the one that you're going to get from another site and say, "Hey, they're lying that you're going to get 30 on that site."

Their Loyalty Program varies from site to site - it's another part of the frustrating "read-the-fine-print-before-you-join" aspects of the thing.

They have also made changes in the program - this bit of adding Club Sandy is a big change, but they have also changed the number of sites that you get immediate access to on particular sites, so again, you can't say, "Hey, that's not what I got 6 months ago - they're lying."

They're not lying, they're changing the program. And since they're changing the program to be more generous and not less, I think it's a good thing - whether it works with any individual is for them to decide.

As I said when I posted about it the first time - for the "join for only 1 month" people, it's not any deal at all.

11-02-08  05:11pm - 5893 days #6
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by Drooler:




Oh, I've realized that there is a fourth type, though it's more ad hoc and not a loyalty program per se: the loyality discount offer you get when you are in the mist of cancelling. I've gotten some OK deals that way, though they're not as cheap as they used to be.



This is the weirdest type of loyalty program, since it's actually a dis-loyalty program. If you stay, you pay the premium price, but if you're going to leave, then you get a better offer.

Mystique.com used to be the worst at this where they would trot out some offer at an extraordinarily high price - one that I would not even consider - and then start working it down month after month until the price they offered was a good deal - but their book-keeping was either really really shoddy or they were just this side of thieves, because you would bite on a one-time-only price and then have to hold onto your e-mail because they're be charging you renewal charges that you would have to e-mail their nasty "Customer Service" people about to get them reversed.

As to the "who picks the sites at 21st Sextury's network" - Would you really expect them to have members pick the order of the bonuses? That'd be ideal from a customer's perspective, but I've never seen any company of any type structure such deals in a customers-decide fashion.

11-01-08  10:30am - 5895 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Whoops! I didn't see this and started a completely different thread with the title "Loyalty Programs - Good Thing or a Rip-off?"

11-01-08  10:28am - 5895 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


Denner & I were having some back-and-forth over the fact that Pix & Video and Club Sandy were now adding each other to their Loyalty Bonus program.

Is this a good thing or a rip-off?

To me, it's a good thing, because I have enjoyed the results of 21st Sextury's Loyalty Bonus program. Denner's complaint was the false/misleading advertising in the 30+ Sites banner at the bottom of the Pix & Video home-page.

I think this complaint of Denner's is very much to-the-point and that 21st Sextury could do themselves quite a bit of good in being clear as to which sites you will get immediate access to when you join and which sites are loyalty bonus sites and at what rate they will be added and in what order.

They do make this more clear at some of their related sites, such as MandyIsKinky.com. But I couldn't figure out for sure at Pix & Video. They do have a new feature where you can search by updates at all of the sites in the network - and looking that way I was able to count 18 sites that are categorized as Instant Access sites. But I would have to contact their Customer Service Dept once again to be sure that I knew what the real deal is at the moment - and even though their Customer Service Dept was quite responsive - 12 minutes was the response time to the question that I asked - the site ought to be clear.

I did have one Loyalty Program that I felt was a rip-off years ago at Masuimi Max's site, IAmTrouble.com. At a certain point, she e-mailed her members that if you were a member for 100 days, you could get a special continuing membership deal. I was a new member at that point and thought, "Cool, I'll definitely stick around for that!" Well, when I reached the point that I was eligible for that Loyalty Discount, there was nothing on the site that mentioned it and I e-mailed Masuimi and got a really pissy response about "Oh, we don't have that anymore. You guys think that we can offer those deals forever" - blah-blah-blah. Given the attitude and the rip-off of waving a deal that was taken away before I had earned it, I was done with her site permanently.

And I think that's what people worry about with these long-term Loyalty Programs - sure it's there today, but if I have to be a member for 9 months to get it, is it still even going to be there in 9 months?

Other thoughts?

10-24-08  10:15pm - 5902 days #41
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
It actually would be a great time for a Canadian vacation - and currency valuation definitely matters. I went on a tip to Europe mid-September - Hungary, Slovakia, Austria, Czech Republic - and the US dollar was so beaten up there was nothing cheap about any of those places - plus people in the Czech Republic just can't cook - anything. They need to get some Hungarians to come over and teach them, cause it's disgusting how bad it is - as bad as England was when I was there, but at least in England you could go to a Pakistani restaurant and get decent food. Nobody can cook, it seems, in the Czech Republic.

This bit with the incredibly fast slide of the Canadian currency, though, that's pretty intense. My sympathies.

As to this thing about pricing - does pricing matter? Of course it does! Unless you're wealthy - in which case, you're probably hiring expensive escorts instead, then price is a big deal. I've joined a site every once in a while that was more than $25 a month, but never for very long at all. I'll be much more likely to join a site for multiple months to get the lower price, than to pay a higher monthly price - and if I don't think the site is going to be worth joining for the longer period, then I'll skip it altogether. Edited on Oct 24, 2008, 10:18pm

10-18-08  10:36pm - 5908 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I can't say that I'm all that excited by Pregnant Porn. I was in favor, though, of Amy Lee joining the ALS trip to the Caribbean when she was preggers because Alex just loves that girl and she loves those trips and really wanted to go and it was a totally unique opportunity for them to have a pregnant model that they loved join them.

She had a great time. They loved having her so it all worked out - then she came on this year's trip with her bod tighter than ever and was the most voracious Pussy Monster I've ever seen, diving on every sweet young puss in sight - I love Amy Lee!

10-18-08  10:32pm - 5908 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
You get membership to all 3 sites if you join through thirdmovies.com or ztod.com as well. You can download as well as stream the movies - there is no DRM either.

10-08-08  10:30pm - 5918 days #12
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Reading some of the comments that Shap has made in Twisty's forum or Alex has made in the Director's blog at ALS Scan, I don't agree that the web site aspect of the adult industry is stronger than ever. Alex has mentioned that overall memberships to porn sites are down and many sites are trying to decrease their costs. You can see that with sites such as DDF's where they have gone to recycling old material for a large percentage of their updates while raising their prices. Twisty's, according to Shap, has pulled back by contracting with less European porn producers. Internet porn was tied into the whole dot com boom and I'll bet that it was easier a few years ago to just toss up a site and have membership come roaring in than it is now. Obviously there is no lack of porn sites, but is the whole scene as much a Field of Dreams as it once was? I doubt it.

10-08-08  10:18pm - 5918 days #14
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Isn't one of the problem with the housing market the fact that banks lent money to people to buy houses they could never afford on their salary? If someone makes 30,000$ a year and goes to the bank and ask for a 500,000$ loan for a house. Don't you think the bank should say, sorry sir but that amount is beyond your capability to payback. I'm going to go on a stretch and say that in our parents time you would never have gotten that kind of loan.
[/QUOTE]

Very true - the mortgage companies were basically pushing the idea that virtually anybody could buy virtually any house, because the values kept going up so the agents promoted the myth that people could sign up for any ridiculous mortgage plan and then refinance when the value of the house had gone up or if the house had to be foreclosed on, then the mortgage company would get a house that had increased in value. Then the bottom fell out of the market, which was impossible to support at the levels that it had ballooned to and everybody got screwed. And the banks and investment houses had developed such sophisticated ways to trade all of the mortgage loans that nobody really had any idea what they owned or what their real exposure was and the whole notion of debt to equity levels having some control, whether at the personal or the institutional level, was thrown out the window - craziness!

10-08-08  10:10pm - 5918 days #22
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
If he's smart, he'll have tucked away a shitload of cash in other countries and he'll go buy a house outside of Budapest or someplace and relax and enjoy himself. He certainly had a ride.

09-14-08  10:10pm - 5942 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Wow! You found another review site that would say something negative about a site they were reviewing? That's an achievement in itself. The ones that I have looked at all seem like they are just trying to earn the referral dollars by saying nice things about every site they review.

09-14-08  10:08pm - 5942 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
two words - paragraphs, please

I don't know about anybody else, but I can't even read this - and since the poster spent a fair amount of time in writing this, I assume that he wanted other people to read it.

09-14-08  10:06pm - 5942 days #22
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Chewing gum doesn't bother me - in fact it's an audio treat to listen to the smacking - even better is a girl with a sucker slurping away - mmmmmmm!!

09-13-08  08:17am - 5944 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
It's so true about porn movies. It's not as true as it was before Zero Tolerance, Jules Jordan and Third Degree brought back extended tease sequences, but for a while you would see a hot girl come out in a hot outfit and within 15 seconds, all you would be seeing was her vagina. I'd be screaming "This could be anybody you morons! I want to see this woman!"

09-13-08  08:13am - 5944 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
This was a poll a while back with a full discussion

09-10-08  08:16pm - 5946 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Hmmm Id say that the entire experience of the female body is what is the turn on.

I mean in reality I wouldn't just have my face planted there so , in my own defense I also do not see continued staring at a moist hole a turn-on if its missing the rest of the body.

In my own thought process this is not reality ( porn use) its part of relaxation and fantasy and having it around relaxes me in life . God knows that sexual tension while it can be a great assets is more a nuisance too so without good porn its be a waste to just stare at a hole .

Cybertoad


Yeah - my feeling exactly - I was looking at a set of a really hot model at DDF - and when it got to dozens of pics of the pussy and showed nothing of the rest of her bod - no tummy, no legs, no boobs - I was thinking - this is just anti-hot. 21st Sextury often gets it right with the camera going in and out and not just diving in, never to return. In The Crack is way too tunnelish for my tastes, though it has more appeal to me than the rough gape stuff.

09-08-08  11:21pm - 5948 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


pics that seem designed to help you get through the exam to become registered as a gynecologist - turn-on or turn-off?





Feel free to add your own "turn-on or turn-off?" question to this thread - as well as answering mine

09-04-08  08:58pm - 5952 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I haven't had complaints about the speed of the site and I haven't noticed anything about navigating the site being faster than it used to be.

09-03-08  02:44am - 5954 days #19
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Maybe I'm a childish over-50 guy, but tattoos aren't an automatic turn-off for me - one of my all-time fave strip club babes had tattoos like crazy - fun ones like pin-up girls and things - and the combination of the artistic tats and her kittenish personality - ooo la la!!

And thongs - hot! Fake boobs are so common that they're not an automatic turn-off if they fit the bod, but you can't do better than great naturals - Katie Fey and Amy Reid are two of the hottest women alive as far as I'm concerned.

Shaved vs bush? Well, considering that ALS Scan is my favorite site, I'm clearly not against shaved. Bushes can be quite nice, as with Japanese women in their porn, but with women in their 20's or older, I prefer a trimmed pubic area - no designs, please - with shaved lips.

Full satin panties do nothing for me. Full hosiery even less.

So does age dictate tastes? Ehh, don't really think so.

09-03-08  02:34am - 5954 days #23
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
A new - and very definite - turn-off - ruined assholes. I just saw some pics from FTV Girls of a cute blonde named Allison - cute except that her asshole looked like she had been gang-banged by a group of just-released ex-cons that forgot that pussies existed - yecccchhh!!

08-30-08  10:48am - 5958 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Who really cares if a porn performer is not the ethnicity advertised? Look at Anetta Keys. She's probably been advertised as every ethnicity one can imagine - so what? She's always hot. That's the main thing I care about.

Look at how many solo-girls have been doing their sites for years, still advertising as being 18. If they're hot, they're hot, and the fact that they're being advertised as being something other than their true age is really no big deal to me - so long as they are old enough that downloading their material isn't going to get me into legal trouble.

08-25-08  10:35pm - 5962 days #6
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I was hoping that Brazzers was going to open an Athletes Like It Big site in time for the Olympics - but nooooooo..

08-23-08  11:08pm - 5964 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


One of the things that I've always liked about porn is the ability to jump on any cultural trend quickly to riff on it in a sexual way. So has anybody seen any sites riffing on the Olympics - there's certainly a lot of hot babes in the Olympics - in gymnastics, in swimming (all of the pool sports - one could imagine lots of fun to be had with porn-babe synchronized swimmers), track and field, etc.

08-20-08  10:04pm - 5967 days #16
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
There are rough fantasy vids that I find a turn on - there's a lot of forced sex fantasy in Japanese porn and I find that a turn on much of the time. Then there's stuff like Funny BDSM, which I also find a turn on - it's really campy and silly. A lot of the other rough sex stuff that's really popular in the US and Europe and is really macho and all about how demeaning the guys can be and how they can break the women - well, that stuff gets really boring. I really enjoyed one Amy Reid scene where the guy was getting rough with her in a way that she wasn't gonna stand for and she just hauled off and punched him in the balls - lol. That settled the bastard down a bit.

The scene described sounds like something that I would find a real turn off. Can there be rape when the girl is paid to be fucked on camera? Sure - and there's a lot of porn where the girls are being taken advantage of - and this sounds like a perfect example.

08-12-08  06:02pm - 5975 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Excessive photo shopping is my deal breaker more than anything else. If I want to look at digital plastic looking crap, I'll go join one of those 3d porn/cartoon sites - and I've had no interest in joining one of those 3d porn/cartoon sites. So why do so many porn producers photo shop their pics until the models look they have been dipped in lacquer?

08-07-08  10:00pm - 5980 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
jsexnetwork.com must pay attention to members' requests, because they frequently post vids and refer to them as Member Requested vids - often crazy Attackers studio or other insane (and fun) shit.

08-06-08  06:52pm - 5981 days #22
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
The problem with Solo Model sites is that they're solo model sites. So it's a matter of the person that put the site together giving a damn for the consumers in the first place as well as a matter of that person getting along with the model over a protracted period of time AND the model remaining interested in working on the site.

There are a lot of guys putting together these sites who just hire some attractive girl to shoot a certain amount of content that they then dole out and the girl was gone before the site was even launched. I'm pretty sure that's the way that the people that did Teen Topanga, Teen Trixie, etc operate.

There are forums where you can read these guys discuss how much content you need in order to launch and how much to pay the girls, etc. It's interesting if you're a fan of these sites to get a glimpse behind the curtains.

Then there's the matter of the model getting along with the guys (or girls) producing the sites. Phil Flash got bored and fired most of his models, including the ones that were most professional (Princess Blueyez & Seanna Teen). Sandy Summers decided that she didn't want to work with a couple of teams of web site characters before she started her newest site SandySummers.com herself with a former member of her last site.

Then there's a matter of the models staying interested. Part of what burned Phil Flash out, I believe, was models flaking on him - cancelling shoots at the last minute that he had prepared for and paid for (or put off other models for) or walking away from sites that he put together for them after a few months. Seanna got a whole new site up and going with another company then walked away after a few months. Raven Riley really pissed off the guys that she worked with when she recently quit. They thought she was the gift that was going to keep giving for years and she could have been. She was doing personal appearances, she was doing frequent cam shows, she was doing hard core shit, she was a solo girl webmaster's dream - then she decided to quit and now they just have their stash of un-released shit to last a while.

With all that said, though, I still like good solo girl sites. Sandy Summers runs a good one with updates almost every day, including a lot of FTV Girls content as well as hot girl/girl stuff and frequent cam shows. The people who do Katie Fey.com, Andi Pink.com, etc are real pros even though lots of their sites are running on stashed material, not new. If you like hot Latinas, Karla Spice's site is a great deal right now because they are giving away membership of 6 other sites as bonuses - it's a whole lot of Latinas for a decent price, which makes it perhaps the best Latina tease deal around - in solo girl sites or otherwise.

07-27-08  08:31am - 5992 days #34
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I agree that Jenna Haze may be a good choice for a superstar, but unlike the other Jenna she didn't get she is by doing mainstream material or shying away from the hardcore stuff.


Far from it. Jenna Haze went the other way. Where Jenna Jameson clearly tried to get as mainstream as she could without losing her cred with the porn audience, Jenna Haze went for it by proving to the porn audience that she was the best. The woman's done virtually everything in terms of 'acts' and she's done it all with an incredible enthusiasm. I've got to say, though, that from recent Brazzers scenes that she's done, I hope she takes a break and takes care of her health. She's been working like a demon the past few years and she's looking a bit gaunt and tired.

07-26-08  11:34am - 5992 days #31
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
One great way to test this assertion that Eastern European women are more emotionless or robotic than their US counterparts is to check out ALS Scan's Caribbean Trips where they have had a mix of US and Eastern European women for the past few years - are the EE women more emotionless than the US women? Hell, no!

Look, there are a lot of people producing porn and a lot of them aren't any good at connecting with the models and getting anything very good out of them. They get the basics - take your clothes off, stick this dildo in your ass, have an orgasm - and it's repetitive and uncreative and emotionless and robotic - and that's the fault, to a large degree, of the people in charge of the production.

Why do I love ALS Scan so much? Because whatever they're doing to connect with their models, they do so more consistently than anybody else out there. And they get better material as a result - and then they're using excellent equipment so they capture what they get well and they present it beautifully - using the same models that can appear emotionless and robotic (bored is my word for it) for other people.

1051-1100 of 1135 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 21 Page 22 23 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.