Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: PinkPanther (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1136)  |   Threads Started (88)

1001-1050 of 1135 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 20 Page 21 22 23 Next Page >

04-22-09  09:52pm - 5722 days #13
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Having seen the page, I think this is a fine tour - very detailed info so any prospective member can know what they're going to get - simple but informative - could be prettier, but it is what it is, so no prospective member can complain about bait-and-switch - and that's important - Good job

04-21-09  06:19pm - 5723 days #24
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
My recommendation - check out the message board at Freeones.com - there's so much activity that sooner or later, you'll run across sites that intrigue you no matter what your kink - for better or for worse.

In 6 month's you'll be posting "Help!! I've found so many new sites that my porn budget is out of control" perhaps.

04-21-09  06:16pm - 5723 days #8
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Small 1-page tours can be OK if they include samples of dated updates so that prospective members can get a sense of whether it's a live site and what the quality is of what's inside and an updated run-down on the quantity of material would be very helpful also - so many photosets, so many vids - and the size of the photos and vids.

These are all things that people here seem to care about - I know I do - and without dated updates, I'm pretty much going to assume that you've got a dead site that you're trying to promote.

04-20-09  07:03pm - 5724 days #17
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
One bonus site that almost had me excited enough to write a review the other day was CutiesGalore.com, which is a bonus to PixandVideo.com. I just got access to it, since you get another 2 sites every month. I checked out one HD vid and I was thinking, "Wow - this is awesome! I love this site! This is as good as Infocus Girls!" Then I waited until I calmed down and downloaded the latest vid from Infocus Girls and checked that out - it's about a billion times better - lol. The fact that it's outdoors with the natural sounds and doesn't have all the face oohing and aahing and has much better production standards just blow away the CutiesGalore vids, though they are quite nice to have as bonus material. One thing about the InfocusGirls stuff, though - they are mercilessly edit-free. They've got their models out on uneven patios and things in high heels and they usually stumble at some point - and the fuckers never edit that out - If I were the model, I'd want to smack 'em!

04-18-09  08:07am - 5727 days #9
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Being a member at the time of the review is important, I think - sites can change quickly - for better or for worse - 1 By Day just recently cut their updates by half, other sites have added zips to all photo sets or moved to HD vids or changed their whole price structure - as In The Crack did a while ago. Reviews done now but based on membership months ago might miss significant changes - so I think your guidelines for yourself are good ones, Monty.

I'll keep an eye out for your reviews

04-17-09  07:34pm - 5727 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Yeah, it would be sheer agony to do full reviews on some of the dross sites that are part of that 21st Sextury network - I wouldn't do another review for a year - but I'd probably win the weekly raffle on sheer number of tickets alone.

04-17-09  06:03pm - 5727 days #8
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
It's also worth checking a couple of other places for deals every now and then - Rabbits Reviews - I can't say much for their reviews, which tend to be extremely dated - new reviews that don't even mention that sites aren't updating anymore, for instance - but they also have a listing of trials and special deals - and the home page of Freeones.com

04-17-09  06:00pm - 5727 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


I was going to submit this as a poll, but polls have limited options, and I had a follow-up question, which is "If you don't review every site that you have joined, what makes you review a site"?

Personally, I have done reviews of only a portion of the sites that I have joined, because I have to have a certain energy level about a site to review it. Otherwise, I get bored in the middle of writing the review and just can the whole thing.

I've reviewed the sites that have thrilled me. I'll be doing one on Johni Darko's site - really a review of the EA network - since that's a site/network that's doing a number of things to get better - definitely a factor in what makes me want to do a review - as well as a site/network that makes me excited to check it out every day to see what's new - the other most important factor in what makes me want to do a review.

Below a certain excitement/energy level about a site, I'll just put a comment on someone else's review - add my 2 cents that way.

04-13-09  09:19pm - 5731 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
The Mitchell Bros O'Farrell Theater is still operating and a number of the patrons there got to know Marilyn a bit and all who did have great things to say about her - she used to love to hang with her fans when she did shows there, apparently.

04-11-09  07:30pm - 5733 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


After reading your post I was curious to see what you meant. Am I correct in assuming that a large part of the sites content is from EA's video archive? How much is truly exclusive to the site?



At Buttman.com, they're doing some exclusive stuff - I think they're aiming at 1/3 older stuff that John wants to un-earth, 1/3 more recent released stuff like the Fashionistas material and 1/3 new exclusive stuff for the site. At the other sites in the network, I haven't seen exclusive stuff for those sites - it's the released vids.

This was their first web-cast live shoot - and the stated intention was to do more if members liked it - everyone in the chat was head-over-heels excited about it and let the EA folks know that, so hopefully they'll do them on a regular basis. If you're a porn fan that likes a BTS feel to things, as I am, it's very cool to see shit like this - especially when the sex action is so astonishingly hot.

04-10-09  08:04pm - 5734 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


I just saw the best web cam event I've ever seen - a 2 1/2 hour shoot by John Stagliano at Buttman.com - fucking awesome. It reminded me very much of Bruce Seven's Beyond The Limits series where he would get the hottest most intense women, put them in a situation and let them go nuts to the point that you just marvelled at their filthy ingenuity. That's what this was like - it started with the two cast performers getting out of their car in the parking lot fighting intensely over the fact that they were 5 minutes late for the live shoot. One of them dragged the other up the stairs by her hair and it was on from there. After 15 minutes, Aiden Starr jumped in, saying that she had been watching from the building across the parking lot and wasn't going to let this go on without her. She was wearing some crazy gargantuan leather strap-on. Then later some EA male employees joined in, cause it was too hot for them not to.

It was truly great - and showed what great rough play porn can be - and why Stagliano is rightly considered such a brilliant porn maker.

Anybody who is tired of cookie cutter shit - it's good to know that fresh exciting intense crazy-ass hot porn is being made.

04-10-09  12:34pm - 5735 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I hadn't even noticed the yellow couch - funny - personally, I distrust any site that has a tour with no dated updates. It's not necessarily a sign of a crappy site - InFocusGirl.com is a site that I really like that doesn't have dated updated on its tour - but it's a bad sign - one that says to me, "Ignore all promises of 20 monthly updates or whatever - you might not get any"

Been burned so I've learned.

04-09-09  06:15pm - 5735 days #21
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by jd1961:


BTW, is porn that only has 2 people involved in production, the paid girl, and a guy holding a camera, nothing more than videotaped prostitution?


You know, there are cases where it pretty much is - I've seen some of these sites where the guy running it is going on about all the babes that he gets to fuck - and since the quality ain't all that, it does seem like the site is just his cover to get to fuck great looking women whenever he wants - which is fine by me, I'm not opposed to 2 consenting adults engaging in commercial sex - and in the SF Bay Area, prostitution is not hardly even considered a criminal offense.

04-08-09  10:07pm - 5736 days #94
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I don't know that it's all that generational - I'm over 50. I like tattoos, find them rather hot, though I'm not interested in committing to having anything inked onto my bod - or spending the money for it, don't particularly care for untrimmed pussy - I certainly am not attracted to the "hairy" stuff. Landing strips or other kinds of trimmed pussy look good to me on most women. A lot of women older than 21 or so don't look good to me shaven. I dunno why - what looks hot to me looks hot, what doesn't doesn't.

I'm a simple man.

04-07-09  10:22pm - 5737 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Behind the scenes - well, it depends. Are they well made? Then they're cool. To tell the truth, I rarely watch them on most porn DVD's - but there are sites, such as ALS Scan, where the BTS stuff can be some of my fave stuff on the site.

04-06-09  08:00pm - 5738 days #63
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I think that there is a certain amount of realistic plastic surgery and a whole lot of disturbingly un-realistic rather horrifying plastic surgery going on in this country - and it's apparent to me that there is no ethical code being followed by plastic surgeons doing breast augmentation and nose jobs and other facial alteration as there is with things like sex changes where people have to also get psychological treatment before surgeons would to at their genitalia with a knife.

Yet I've known women who had boobs that most women would pray to have go out and get boob jobs so they could inflate a sweater - and it wasn't to please the guys around them - because I know for a fact that most guys around this girl were begging her not to do it.

There are prominent actresses like Ashlee Simpson that have had gorgeous natural faces hacked away at with scalpels till she looked like a plastic doll - personally I'd like to beat the crap out of the doctor that went and did that instead of encouraging her to get some counseling with someone that might help her recognize how gorgeous she already was.

In the porn world, I would say the same about Teagan Presley - she was an incredibly gorgeous woman - now I can't watch her recent scenes - she looks good in some shoots that have been photo-shopped to hell in back, but on video - no, no, no, no, no!

Now, exotics if you want to diagnose me as being a male chauvinist low-tolerant neurotic or whatever for thinking these things, go ahead and do so.

04-05-09  12:19am - 5740 days #42
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
So, exotics, you're surprised that guys at PornUsers.com are judging women's attractiveness by their bods? Has this not been completely apparent by virtually every single review on this site?

Boobs are important to guys who get into looking at women's bods - and guys are pretty damned opinionated about it - some look at every instance of enhanced boobs as mutilation, some think that virtually every woman that makes a living off of showing off her bod would look better with enhanced boobs.

Many guys have more nuanced views - but guys are pretty damned blunt and opionionated whenever this subject takes place - and that's the case on every single forum that I've ever seen this subject discussed on.

04-03-09  11:26pm - 5741 days #34
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
One of the more disturbing aspects of the Fake Boob craze is the everydody's-got-to-do-it thing that infects the women as much as any guys involved. I'm an unabashed strip club afficianado and I find it very frustrating when small-breasted faves - or faves with absolutely perfect most-women-would-pray-to-have-them natural boobs go out and get fake boobs - because when they compare themselves to other women with fake boobs and see how much those fake boobs inflate any article of clothing, they feel un-worthy.

It's really a shame. I was getting a dance with a really adorable Asian babe a couple of weeks ago and when our "regular" lapdance ended, she asked me if I wanted a topless. I definitely wanted more time with her and was glad to make her happy by giving her the additional bucks for a topless dance, though I was perfectly happy spending time with her with her top on. When she took off her bra, I was marvelling at her beautiful long nipples - but she was all apologetic about her small boobs. This girl has really pretty small boobs and wonderful big pencil-eraser nipples, so it's rather a shame, in my opinion that she should feel like she has anything to apologize for - it ain't as if she were wearing some push-up padded bra to give the impression of having bigger boobs where I would feel like there was some bait-and-switch going on.

I think two of my faves have taken off this week, as a matter of fact, to get boob jobs - and both had really nice tiny titties - one of them had the prettiest natural bod in the whole club.

Whatcha gonna do? Me, I appreciate the babes like Jenna Haze, that have small natural boobs and like them just as they are and have no intention of messing with them.

There's too many plastic surgery disasters, like Teagan Presley, whose attractiveness, as far as I'm concerned, has gone straight downhill with every bit of surgery that she's gone to make a once-fabulous body more "perfect".

04-02-09  06:47am - 5743 days #12
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I'm a big fan of the Message Board/Forum at Freeones.com, because it is so heavily traffic'd that there is an immense amount of participation and every fetish under the sun talked about.

One of the most popular forum topics there for a long time has been "Plastic/Barbie Girls" - guys looking for the most man-made babes around. Those guys - and there's a lot of them - would be all over a DVD that advertised that it was all about great-looking fake boobs.

03-31-09  10:39pm - 5744 days #20
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
It's a mystery to me why people continue to buy DVD's, now that I'm pretty much done with the practice - the quality of downloaded material - and I'm talking about from paysites - is good enough on a nice big monitor to not make it worthwhile to buy DVD's anymore for me. But the BluRay thing is definitely hooking plenty of people - Digital Playground, especially, has been all over the bluray thing - and selling the damned things like crazy at premium prices too.

03-26-09  07:02am - 5750 days #35
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Khan's mention of watching V For Vendetta every year made me think of movies that I crave at least once a year.

V for Vendetta's isn't one for me, but..

Seven Samurais for sure - one of the most entertaining and flat-out best films ever

Pulp Fiction - I'm a big fan of Tarantino - his cultural references show that he's seen the same films as I have and he does amazing things for his actors.

Armageddon - it's cheesy, rather ridiculous, but the complete entertainment package - humor, action, pathos, spectacle

Die Hard 3 - Bruce Willis, Samuel Jackson - can't go wrong with that pair

Fargo - Just listening to the spot-on dialects is a joy, but the acting is all incredible

03-26-09  06:51am - 5750 days #17
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Some of those graphical tests are reasonable - most of them are legible to me - but every once in a while - and I ran into one last week, can't remember where - they are so messed up looking that it takes me 10 tries before I get the damned thing right.

03-25-09  06:08pm - 5750 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Would Stalin prefer Evil Angel or Wicked? Inquiring minds want to know!

As to the quantity/quality thing, a lot of crap is crap.

A lot of good stuff is good.

Some sites that I like a lot (Phil Flash's sites) piss me off because their update schedule sucks beans and I'm rather fed up with that crap - and now since all of the models that I liked the most are gone or are doing their cam shows elsewhere, there's less keeping me there.

Sites that don't have things as special as live events, such as cam shows, had better be offering a good update schedule and exciting updates - or I'll be gone baby gone.

03-25-09  06:00pm - 5750 days #8
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Great question:

I like being able to search by ethnicity
hair color
build
boob size
clothing (bikinis, socks, schoolgirl outfits always are nice to see listed)
category of material (solo, girl/girl, boy/girl) - if they get more detailed than that I'm happy

03-23-09  10:47pm - 5752 days #21
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I'm a big porn fan, of course, and I'm also a big fan of Classic Movies - film noir, screwball comedies, 30's and 40's Hitchcock. The studio system is good for porn - look at the likes of Evil Angel & Jules Jordan and the network of porn pros that congregate around those studies and support each other - and it was good for making non-porn films. The writing was tight, the camera work was tight, the editing was tight, the acting was tight.

I pretty much can't stand modern "comedy" films - especially the stuff that came out of the Saturday Night Live crew. It's just watching a bunch of coke-heads that think they're really hot to me.

But the screwball comedies of Preston Sturges, WC Fields, The Marx Bros and that stuff had real skill and was clever and is still hilarious stuff to me. Judd Apatow is bringing back some of that, to me - I've enjoyed his stuff quite a bit.

Recent movies I liked - The Wrestler and that Danny Boyle movie, Slumdog Millionaire, were both great.

I noticed someone mentioning Unforgiven -brilliant film. Eastwood's a great director. I haven't seen his most recent films. I will when they're on cable.

03-21-09  11:38am - 5755 days #11
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
My view is this:

There was nothing wrong with your review if I believe that you had no inkling that you would get the reward that you received. I have no reason NOT to believe it so there was nothing wrong with your review. It's a review of the site from someone that appreciated the site.

As to future comments on the site, such as "Hey, I just noticed that they made this great change" - larger vids, more frequent updates, larger resolution pics or whatever, the challenge for you is to do an internal double check: Would I be posting this comment if I were an ordinary paying member of this site? If the internal double check comes back "yes", well post it.

The main purpose of PU is to share information about the sites that we have experience with - this is still a site that you have experience with so the fact that you were the recipient of this present from them should not disqualify you from the ability to share information on this site with us.

And don't think badly of me when I review this site and give it a 105 - lol

03-21-09  11:28am - 5755 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I'm not nearly as emotionally-connected to other participants of this forum as some of you are, I guess. I'm here while I'm here and I enjoy the back-and-forth. It's as good an environment as I've seen for the exchange of information & opinions on this subject, since I don't see any flaming - something that some internet forums are just addicted to, which make for a noxious environment.

But I don't promise to let you all know when I'm going on vacations and I doubt that I'll be doing any house-to-house visits when I post my last at this forum. I suspect that I won't know that it will be my last post. I'll just become otherwise occupied. Which is, I suspect what happened to the departed ones already mentioned - they just plain became otherwise occupied.

03-13-09  11:13pm - 5762 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I've heard this stuff about long vids and for my tastes it's entirely long - to me it's like the Vivid vs Jules Jordan thing to give the extreme sides of the issue. Vivid likes to concentrate on their stories and they have relatively short sex scenes that are just that - sex scenes. Jules Jordan likes to have lengthy tease/set-up scenes - 10 minutes of tease is not uncommon with his vids. Me, I'm loving that stuff. That's what I want is for porn producers to find hot women, put them in hot sexy clothes and let me enjoy the site from every angle imaginable for a good long time and have me dying for someone to get their hands on her by the time that happens.

I consider it a complete waste of casting and effort for a porn producer to find hot women, put them in hot sexy clothes and not use it for anything. Can there be long boring scenes? Sure - and that's crap porn. It wouldn't be better if it were shorter. It would just be shorter crap porn in my opinion.

I've got to say that I feel no obligation to watch the entirety of any scene. I can always go back and watch more later.

One caveat - If I were a porn vid reviewer, I might feel differently. Roger Pipe has complained for a couple of years now about super-long DVD's, even though many porn producers that make the longest DVD's are some of his favorite - but that's because he has to spend 4-5 hours watching the whole thing. Me, I get to watch what I want when I want and come back and watch more sometime later - so give me nice long tease scenes and sexy set-ups every time.

02-28-09  09:23am - 5776 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Aside from Private.com, which was a complete rip-off experience, I haven't had much difficulty in cancelling any other sites with their various payment processing plans, though with Dani.com, it took direct communication with their C/S, who were very responsive - like within 15 minutes.

02-19-09  06:51am - 5785 days #27
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
That was the idea of Zero Tolerance - no tolerance for clown boobs, suitcase pimps, huge disfiguring tattoos, etc. In all of their early vids, the first thing they would do is interrogate the performer and inspect their bods to make sure none of the outlawed aspects were there. I haven't kept up to see if they are still keeping to that model.

Alex of ALS HATES implants and has only shot models with enhanced boobs a few times, that I know of - and those times were with models that he had shot before natural and didn't want to say "No" to when they wanted to model again, if their boobs weren't crazy big.

They also haven't shot a lot of models with tattoos and fired their female assistant that had very intense tattoos when members complained about her interfering in their enjoyment of scenes that she was shown in.

Nikki Nine was the performer that killed her contract career by getting huge tattoos. She had been signed by Hustler to great fanfare, used her signing fee to go out and get huge-ass tattoos and was fired.

02-19-09  06:43am - 5785 days #22
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


There's the dichotomy. Gonzo is supposed to be about real sex, and putting the viewer directly into the scene, as he has sex with beautiful women. You are supposed to be part of it. Unless you visit prostitutes an awful lot, Gonzo seems to have the exact opposite effect. None of the women look or dress like normal women. The down to earth Gonzo niche has evolved into something totally different. There is nothing much more unnatural than Gonzo, especially given the nasty turn a lot of the stuff has taken. I still think Buttman was the best producer of straight porn ever. He was one of the originators of Gonzo, and for me, got it just about right.


I think you're confusing gonzo and pro-am. In pro-am stuff, the intent is to convey the impression of average people fucking. To me the whole thing about gonzo was that porn producers wante to follow their crazed obsessions without worrying about having to tell some BS story that neither they nor the viewer gave a fuck about. One of Stagliano's (spelling) early partners was Bruce Seven, who was more the originator of what has become the Jules Jordan style of porn than anybody. He was very into strip club dancing, had poles in lots of his scenes, had his performers wear crazy sexy fantasy wear, frequently had dance sequences in the scenes, even in his bondage stuff he had performers in stripper-wear much of the time.

Lots of early gonzo was very intense and dark and rough, such as the stuff done by Jamie Gillis and John Leslie.

The reality is that many of these guys are seriously kinky in their personal life as well, so the desire of the audience for well-produced crazy stuff has combined with their own affection for crazy stuff to push the envelope. And then markets opened up and lots of untalented people produced lots of rough sex crap to feed the market.

02-19-09  06:30am - 5785 days #21
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Another aspect feeding this - as time has gone on, feature dancing has been more and more an important part of the industry. It's a large part of the income for dancers that do it and the fact that so many dancers are out there doing it means that their stripper wear probably found its way into porn scenes and porn producers realized that it was hotter to shoot performers in that stuff than it was in more normal clothing - and more porn fans liked the fantasy wear than liked the porn shot in normal clothing.

That's my theory anyway.

02-19-09  06:27am - 5785 days #20
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


That is true, I hadn't thought of that. The anonymity provided by performing in a costume must have its appeal.

It's like they are superheros in thongs and skin tight clothing! Oh wait, that's rather normal for the genre.


I think this is actually to the point - putting on the stripper outfits - which is really what they are - puts the performers in the mind-set quickly and is quite fun to watch. Me, I prefer porn with performers in fantasy wear - crazy tight bootie shorts or belt-length "dresses" that demand a lot of panties-tease. My complaint is with porn producers that don't make use of that stuff and allow us to enjoy it. I remember a scene with Chloe where she walked into the scene with some super-sexy outfit and was naked in 3 seconds and then the camera was in her vagina - at least I suppose it was hers. Without seeing her bod or her face, she might have done a cameo and then left.

On the other hand, I just watched a Jules Jordan vid with Charmane Starr where she was wearing some sexy stripper-wear and there was 10 minutes of excellent tease before the sex started - and the camera was all over her gorgeous face and body throughout the scene - no "I'm shooting a fuck scene so I can turn my brain off" shit.

02-15-09  10:28am - 5789 days #18
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
POV can be good. Jules Jordan has certainly done some tremendous POV stuff. Other times it's crap. Raven Riley did a bunch of POV stuff that frustrated the hell out of me because I would have so much more enjoyed a camera that had the freedom to roam around and explore her gorgeous body from all angles. In general, I prefer that roaming camera idea to the POV stuff. The worst is the stationery camera where nobody is taking advantage of the opportunity to get the good stuff.

I saw a documentary series about Vivid's attempts to get the right to do a new version of "Deep Throat" and they had numerous scenes of Vivid's shoots. In all those scenes, the director was about 30 feet away during the sex scenes, yakking with someone else about a completely different subject or stuffing food in their mouth. It made it perfectly clear why Vivid's sex scenes are such crap.

02-15-09  10:21am - 5789 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I agree that the best reviews take into account both objective and subjective factors.

Important things like rate of updates and quality of material presented are important to include, however it's also important to note if they are presenting frequent updates and good size pics and vids of boring material.

Then a key thing to include is the Enjoyment Factor. Did you like being a member? Would you recommend it?

I like the reviews that include things like "This site is probably worth a one-month join because..."

That's what I aim for in my reviews, successfully or not, and what I most respect in other people's reviews.

As to your current reviews being different than your earlier ones, that sounds like a good thing - kind of like a Stagnation Test - you passed.

02-15-09  10:12am - 5789 days #24
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Having talked to lots of women with extensive tattoos - living in the Bay Area, that's not difficult - I can say that most women are getting tattoos because they want them. That's the culture that they are attracted to. It's edgy and individualistic, as they see it and they want to express themselves by spending lots of money getting extensive tattoos, not to prevent bookings for all-natural porn sites.

02-06-09  10:30am - 5798 days #4
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
There are a few sites where the Bonus Material is worth something - both Nubiles.net and Teendreams have bonus material that is worth something. Twisty's added NicoleGraves.com as a bonus site for members and that's definitely worth something.

KarenDreams.com has bonus material that is sample sets from lots of different sites - that's fun quality material, though nothing you couldn't find at Freeones.com's message board easily. Still, it's good looking stuff.

But the plug-in drek that is the "bonus" on most sites? What's the point? It's crap. They would score higher points with me to not have it, since it's such poor quality garbage.

02-06-09  09:08am - 5798 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Two porn performers whose stuff holds up incredibly well:

Racquel Darrian - just because she was so freaking gorgeous. You can see all the kitchy elements of porn of that time in her stuff, the crazy big hair and ridiculous mullets on the guys, but you don't lose the heat because the woman is so freaking gorgeous.

Oh, did I mention that she's freaking gorgeous?

Ginger Lynn - One of those girls that is so pretty that it's still surprising that she did porn. She was like the prettiest cheerleader in high school type, she was a great performer, nastier & more enthusiastic than most girls performing at the same time so her stuff holds up remarkably well. Doubt me? Get a copy of Ball-Busters, an early vignette vid she was in, directed by Alex de Renzy. The first seconds of her sex scene, a close-up of her inhaling a cock down the base, is one of the best BJ vid shots of all time. And the whole scene is great, if rather brief.

I saw this vid in theaters more times than any other porn vid. It's so good that it was being shown on double bills in Pussycat Theaters years after it's original release and I loved seeing that action on a big screen.

02-01-09  06:20pm - 5802 days #3
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
There do some to be porn fans with crazy amounts of money - the people that hire escorts, many current or former porn stars, through sites such as BodyMiracle.com as prices of $1500/hour, for example. Or the Europeans that fly to AVN every year. For these people - direct your own porn would be a great concept.

01-30-09  08:21pm - 5804 days #39
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Yeah, I've considered joining FTV Girls, because they've got a good rep and are rated highly by many, but then I check out samples and whenever I do I find myself bored very very quickly - especially their vids, which I find utterly devoid of any sexual heat. They even got Amy Reid to be boring, which in my experience has got to be some work.

01-29-09  06:47am - 5806 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I would post them in the Site Comments area - that's where I have posted issues like the difficulties in cancelling Private.com. Then the forum is also a place to post about unethical sites. And there's no need to be coy or defensive about it - name the fuckers!

Look, these sites have an obligation to be professional and straight-forward in their business practices. And if they are not professional and straight-forward in their business practices and have hidden "joins", then this is a great site to call them out - by name - and warn others that might get jammed up by these thieves.

Khan will let us know if we step over the line in doing so - but so long as we are posting accurate information about our experiences with the sites, then PornUsers.com administrators should have no reason to intervene in those posts.

01-28-09  06:05pm - 5806 days #37
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Interesting factoid - I was e-mailing Alex at ALS Scans feedback on his latest blog - a hilarious rip on FTV Girls and their copy-catting of ALS Scans - and mentioned how great his stuff looks on my new monitor. He said they produce their stuff on 30" monitors - damn! No wonder he talks about not being able to stop looking at pics of the hottest models they get!

01-27-09  06:09pm - 5807 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
There was an article on MSNBC.com the other day about the porn recession, which is real and the business overall is down more than 10%. One of the funny quotes was by Steve Hirsch of Vivid talking about how they're better off than most because they are known for such high quality - I practically spit. Yeah, right. Vivid is known for high quality. Vivid is known for having a lot of hot exclusive contract girls that they waste in a despicable manner making crappy cookie-cutter porn. They're doing well because they are piped into every hotel room in the country so bored travellers will buy their crap.

01-23-09  06:05pm - 5811 days #36
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
OK - I got my 22" Samsung set up with the correct resolution. ALS Scan photos have never looked so awesome. I am a happy panther!

01-21-09  06:58pm - 5813 days #26
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
OK - I went back and got a 22" Samsung with 20,000:1 contrast. I'm having trouble getting the damned base connector - the thing between the base and the monitor - to click into the opening at the bottom of the monitor. Am I totally lame or is there some trick to this? I'm about as mechanically inclined, generally, as Barney Fife, which is why my nick-name is that of a world-class klutz.

01-16-09  10:22pm - 5818 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA


I'm wondering if I should get a big monitor - like 24" LCD since the prices are so low now.

I looked in the forum history and it's been awhile since people were yakking about equipment. I've got a nice 19" Dell CRT, which looks nice, but I'm wondering if I'm missing some real oomph factor when I look at pics on sites such as Babelicious.com, ALS Scan, Met Art and such.

01-05-09  06:23pm - 5829 days #15
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Some sites are gonna give you one thing. Some sites are gonna give you something else. I don't particularly expect every site I join to give me the full spectrum of what I like. If they do, hooray. If they give me enjoyment with what they do, that's a good site.

I'm a simple man. I just want to be turned on. If they turn me on, I'm happy. If they don't turn me on, they aren't doing their jobs.

01-05-09  06:19pm - 5829 days #2
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
The stiletto thing reminds me of the schoolgirl conversation going on a couple of weeks ago. Another member was saying that he didn't like girls older than 18 dressed as schoolgirls. I'm fine with women in their 30's dressed as schoolgirls, if they're hot. Some women are really into shoe fetishes. When I was a member of Kate's Playground, I had a good time teasing Kate about it cause on every cam show, she'd wear a new pair of psycho crazy heels. Like anything else, it can be well done or poorly done, but I rememeber Karen Dreams doing a vid where she was cursing like a sailor putting on this fairy dress - really frilly and sexy and traipsing out to the woods wearing it with high heels on, trying not to fall - for some reason, the whole thing was a huge turn on.

01-05-09  06:02am - 5830 days #13
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Yeah, I've joined 'em - they're a dying breed. Here's the thing I like about 'em. Do you ever watch movies made during the days of the "code" where they couldn't have too much violence and they couldn't have too much sex so they had to have witty sexual innuendo and good scripts and stories and things?

That's how I look at the non-nude thing. If a site's going to be good being non-nude they gotta give you a lot of the model's personality and put her in hot sexy outfits and tease the crap out of you really really well. And if they do that, it's fun - and can be a lot more creative than the forumulaic "count the pics of tease, count the pics of topless, count the pics of bottomless, now here's the pussy" stuff that's all over the fucking place - and the good ones don't photo-shop the model so you can't tell what she fucking looks like.

01-03-09  01:03pm - 5832 days #13
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
The bad in bad porn photography - excessive pic treatment

I know I've been ranting about this a lot, but I'm gonna keep going - maybe other people will join me and make similar amounts of noise and people who run sites will notice and we'll have more pics of gorgeous women that look noticeably like gorgeous women and less like 3d art.

THE thing that kills pics for me, more than any other element, is excessive pic treatment - you can have the best model in the hottest outfit in the coolest location and then photoshop the shit out of it and make it so that there's no skin definition or anything else that makes humans hot and they've just wasted a bunch of money and time as far as I'm concerned, because in the end, what they've produced is crap, as far as I'm concerned.

1001-1050 of 1135 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 20 Page 21 22 23 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.