| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
Too right, my friend.
The fact that my 'Striptease' thread has run so long emphasizes the fact that there is still a market for this!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-29-12 02:20pm
|
Reply
677
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
Just stop looking before she gets naked then. :0D
I do appreciate that a lot of people do like that, but provided it is a slow strip, in the correct order for you, you will get there.
For me, full nudity is a prerequisite about 2/3rds of the way through.
As long as she is going to get there, I am going to enjoy the journey.
Actually the removal of shoes & hose can be a particularly erotic part of the striptease, if performed & captured well.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-29-12 02:09pm
|
Reply
678
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
Yes,I love a striptease too,so that is fine by me, as long as I get progression to coy & more explicit full nudity.
To paraphrase what I said in another recent reply:
The journey is as important as the destination! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-29-12 01:57pm
|
Reply
679
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
I thought as much.
Sites like these eg. the 'Only' sites serve more to frustrate than satisfy IMO
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-29-12 01:48pm
|
Reply
680
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
I think it is going to be the lack of consistent full nudity that will be a stumbling block for me!
Cap'n :0/
|
01-29-12 01:40pm
|
Reply
681
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm happy to see them all.
I don't really have a preferred age range.
If she is attractive, I want to have a look! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-29-12 05:01am
|
Reply
682
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I quite agree.
The journey IS as important as the destination! ;0)
Cap'n :0)
|
01-28-12 10:31am
|
Reply
683
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
Reply of
Jutti24's Review
Thanks for the additional info.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-27-12 02:08pm
|
Reply
684
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
" I think most people had the impression that it was just the smaller inferior sister site of Met Art where they dumped the content that didn't make the grade to be showcased on Met Art. "
...but isn't that really essentially what it is?
Even if the site is wearing smarter clothes! :0S
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-26-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
685
|
ModFX Models
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Hhmmm.
When I clicked it, it just reloaded the intro page.
Doesn't look good really, does it!
Cap'n. :0(
|
01-26-12 03:00pm
|
Reply
686
|
Jugg Master
(0)
|
Reply of
Jutti24's Review
When you say softcore, does it normally go to full nudity?
( & I don't mean the dodgy version of 'nude' that involves having some clothes on).
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-26-12 09:20am
|
Reply
687
|
Busty Madison Blush
(0)
|
Reply of
Jutti24's Review
Even for fans, that has to be a stiff price for the content!
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-26-12 09:10am
|
Reply
688
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not knowingly. :00
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-25-12 09:25am
|
Reply
689
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. Never have. Never would.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-23-12 08:57am
|
Reply
690
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I only download the material that interests me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-12 02:23am
|
Reply
691
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-19-12 11:28pm
|
Reply
692
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Western Europe, geographically, but not politically! :0)
|
01-19-12 09:08am
|
Reply
693
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
Overall, I would class them as average. Sets are usually well lit, and shot nicely. I think the problem was more in the equipment used. More recent stuff is shot with higher res equipment & noticeably better for it. Nothing here is ultra high resolution as yet.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-18-12 11:32pm
|
Reply
694
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
Thank you.
It pans out close to RL really, although there is well above average amount of pregnant models.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-18-12 04:56pm
|
Reply
695
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks.
I'm pleased you found it useful, tangub.
Yes, so far as I could tell access was complete for the 7 days of the trial. Very fair, I thought.
For me, it is potentially a very good site, if the issues I raised were resolved. As it is primarily a nipple fetish site though, I doubt that they will be.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-18-12 10:25am
|
Review
696
|
Just Nips
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Over 500 amateur models featured.
They do mean amateur too. There is everything here from petite boyish to BBW, barely legal to mature, stunningly pretty, through 'next door' to downright scary!
+ Models seem to enjoy themselves. Always a plus to me.
The Webmaster seems to be directly involved in the shooting & whilst encouraging going to full body nudity, does not press the models to do anything they are not comfortable with.
The flip side of this is that he doesn't stop them if they are enjoying themselves. ;)
+ The models are treated with respect
+ Full strips to nude appears to be the norm, sometimes a variety of outfits are featured(..briefly).
+ Zips available
+ HD Video available.
Not being a video guy I really can't give a view on this other than they look OK to me.
+ Site is nicely presented & functional, especially so given this is not a big budget operation.
+ Friendly & communicative Webmaster, who also does the photography.
+ Comprehensive FAQ page |
| Cons: |
-Some info. seems fragmented & conflicts. At writing, the header on the Amateur page says 44985 pics/651 videos/402 Amateurs. Very out of date. Same page lower down 581 Sessions 76337 Images 2237 Videos. No mention of the currently 517 models.
-Sets seem rushed, there are very few fully clothed shots, often even the fleeting one or two often are not full body shots. It would be nice to to have ten or a dozen or so fully clothed shots before the stripping just to assess & build up anticipation.
-When the model has come with a variety of outfits, there is very little material featured of each. That rushed feeling again.
-Not a lot of material of each model available. A few return for another shoot, but not many. The studio location is something to do with that. Thumbnails crop the full image. Sometimes a vert. format thumbnail hides a hor. format shot.
-Only 1 pic res. available typ.1200x800
-Zip files need renaming, they come with a sequential number only.
-Barely any model bio |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, owing to a neat trial deal I took the plunge & thought I would share my findings.
Updates are 2 - 3 a week.
Split between photoset & video is roughly 50/50
Possibly because of the specific naming & targetting of this site it had slipped under my radar. Whilst the material is almost exclusively softcore, it features quite a bit more than the just topless material the site naming implies.
I am pleased I tried it, because it is pretty much on topic for my FC2N fetish! ;)
( Fully clothed to nude...An acronym coined by my friend Auxilia )
For me, the style needs to be expanded. Specifically, the rushed feeling needs to be addressed.
The Webmaster is aware of it and has lengthened the shoots from 1 hour to 3 IIRC
I do feel, the uploaded sets still need editing more benignly though, as I mentioned above.
As it stands there are only a few shots in each set which hit the spot for me.
They are there, in ones & twos but I just need a lot more of that style in each set.
If you are looking for anything other than solo softcore then really this site is not for you.
If however, you like me, like seeing geniune amateurs strip naked....it is certainly worth a punt.
I should also mention that some of the models featured are in advanced stages of pregnancy, in some cases I quite like that, but know others don't.
It is so near.
Another nearly, but not quite for me.
In case you didn't realise, both the pros & cons would have been longer but in both cases I ran out of space! :0( |
|
01-18-12 09:48am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
697
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I can't do with it.
Once you have seen one the novelty quickly wears off.
For some sites it is put up as an update.
I think that is both cheating & lazy.
Cap'n. :0(
|
01-17-12 09:10am
|
Reply
698
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
Yes, otoh, you are correct there.
This from the members area:
'Published on 2 Dec 2011
Today we not only welcome new model Alexa, but this is our first set shot by our friend Eric. Please welcome both Alexa and Eric to FigureBaby. You'll be seeing alot more from both of them!'
I agree his work is so far a welcome addition!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-16-12 11:34am
|
Reply
699
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I had forgotten about it TBH.
Cap'n :00
|
01-15-12 02:24am
|
Reply
700
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
No, I always have to check & recheck.
I'm like that with telephone numbers too.
Cap'n. :0(
|
01-13-12 05:24am
|
