| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Looker's Comment
I also agree, the models are great. Trouble is the network is plagued with technical problems and as nearly all of the girlies are in scenes on better sites its hard to recommend a membership here. Ironiclly all of the latest sites added to teencoreclub feature recycled content from those better sites!
|
03-11-11 06:01am
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Depends on the site. If its a small site I can have everything downloaded in the first visit and wont ever go back.
|
03-11-11 05:57am
|
Reply
278
|
Subverted Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I find that representing all of my thoughts and feelings about a site with a single number is at best very difficult. I have always been very harsh with the scores, not giving kneejerk 100's or 50's. The reason I gave this one a 65 is because, in comparison to the other sites that I have reviewed, that is what I feel is fair.
|
03-11-11 12:33am
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I am way beyond being a mere porn collector, I am a porn Connoisseur dammit!
|
03-10-11 06:42am
|
Comment
280
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
03-10-11 06:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
281
|
Subverted Teens
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Only $20
+ One time payment, no subscriptions to remember to cancel
+ 48 720P HD videos @ 4 mbps
+ 2 1080P HD videos @ 4 mbps
+ Decent download speeds
+ No regional pricing
+ Supports download managers but limited to 2 simutainous connections
+ No DRM |
| Cons: |
- Very basic members area, just a list of videos
- No picture sets
- Not all models are named
- Same girls can appear in many videos with the same actor
- Not exclusive content |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a budget site, no doubt about it. They went off and licensed 50 videos, whacked them on a webpage and charge you $20 to download them. When you look at how basic everything is, it's obvious they put in the least amount of effort possible when setting up the site. From the site design and navigation to the content selection and presentation it all screams low rent.
There is really no pretence that they will ever update the site, they don't promise it and judging by the fact that there are no subscription options, I don't think there will be any updates.
To score this site was really tough, 50 HD videos for $20 is not a bad deal. The models are generally very attractive, the action is dirty and the quality is good. The 2 things that negatively impacted on my opinion, thus on the score, were as follows.
High level of model repetition. In a site with only 50 videos it's easy to spot the same faces. Here, the unattractive "Susanna" and her same "boyfriend" are in 4 videos and the skinny skank "Susane" and her same "boyfriend are in 5 videos. Five points off.
Secondly, I would estimate at least a quarter of the videos I have had on my hard drive for a few years. I recognized about 5 scenes from the early days of FirstAnalQuest.com, and load more from the pornxn network of sites. Five points off.
But both of these negatives are quite personal to me. If you were never a member of those other sites and/or find the repeated models attractive the score would for you would be higher.
Do I recommend this site? In a word, yes. For my $20 I did get several rather good scenes and dont feel cheated by false promises. I didnt expect the world and was not upset when they didnt deliver it. |
|
03-10-11 05:53am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
282
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
03-07-11 05:16am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have been using the same computer for over 10 years. I have replaced the motherboard a few times, the cpu now and again, the memory once or twice, the graphics card yearly and the case on the odd ocassion but its still the same computer, honest.
|
03-05-11 06:47am
|
Reply
284
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
Decent review but I cant help but feel 80 is high considering the sites shortcomings. I know you addressed this to some degree in your bottom line but I would still like to see more justification for that score.
|
02-28-11 06:45am
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
Here in Prague its more expensive to go to a strip club and have a lap dance than it is to go to a brothel and have sex. Ideal solution is to get a girl for a hour in a brothel and have her dance for you the entire time, result :)
|
02-28-11 06:40am
|
Comment
286
|
Dirtygardengirl
(0)
|
|
02-28-11 03:25am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Well, if you are comfortable enough to install and configure Linux on a new PC I would bet my left testie that you are also able to build the PC yourself from the individual components.
|
02-25-11 05:17am
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I am not convinced Linux is ready to be used by the masses just yet, even something like Ubuntu which is one of the most friendly. I am a IT professional and using it still drives me nuts with the unnecessary complication of doing certain things and the lack of polish in certain areas. Add to that the fact that finding drivers for obscure / el cheapo hardware can eat a afternoon of your time with no guarantee you will get it running and you have a nightmare for mere mortal computer users :) And don't get me started on the Apple tax...
|
02-25-11 03:59am
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hate to be pedantic but other is the only valid option here. Both types of computer can run a plethora of operating systems, most of which are not exclusive to that machine. But to answer the question I use Vista 64bit on my laptop and my 2 media servers, Windows 7 on my htpc, XP on my netbook, Linux (Android) on my phone and at work I use a mixture of Windows Server 2008 and Debian Linux.
|
02-25-11 01:19am
|
Comment
290
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
|
02-22-11 09:49am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
291
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
bently's Review
While I generally like the content offered by this network, there are so many other issues that giving it a 90 is, IMO, not a fair score. The complete lack of user interface features, the need to log in to each site in the network individually, the lack of model index, the expensive price, the download speed problems and the sites being regularly unavailable all should knock a fair whack off of that score.
|
02-22-11 09:35am
|
Reply
292
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I hold my hands up, I didn't actually think of that when I wrote the sentence. Although being British the double entendre is so deeply entrenched in our being, we use them subconsciously all the time :)
|
02-22-11 09:29am
|
Reply
293
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I remember reading article about their shady practices a while ago. It mentioned they have improved they way they do business although they are certainly not squeaky clean. The article centred on their owning and running many tube sites, which is understandably why the industry were not too fond of them. I don't recall it mentioning them screwing over customers, do you have any details about this?
|
02-22-11 09:26am
|
Reply
294
|
Fuck You Paul
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Comment
Maybe I am completely missing the point of your comment, but are you criticizing this site because you can download all its content via torrents? I'm sorry but what the fuck? The complete works of Shakespeare are available on torrent sites, does that devalue his work? Just because you can CHOOSE to illegal download something should in no way reflect badly on the quality of that thing. If you don’t think the site is worth its membership fee, fine, but comparing the value of a site membership to the value of file sharing site membership is absolutely ridiculous. If everyone were to think like you, sites would have no members and thus produce no content for you to illegally download. I am not some anti-piracy whacko but the logic displayed in your post is way out of kilter.
|
02-19-11 02:19am
|
Reply
295
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks you for the positive encouragement. I don't have a blog or any other outlet for my ramblings, I tend to analyze and dissect movies and other media over several beers each Friday night in the pub. Alcohol fueled debate is always a interesting experience :)
|
02-18-11 02:57am
|
Comment
296
|
Filthy And Fisting
(0)
|
|
02-17-11 03:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
297
|
Brazzers
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Recent 1080P videos are EXCELLENT Quality
+ Photo sets with 99% of scenes
+ Great value yearly membership
+ Zipped photo sets
+ Multiple video quality download options
+ Mostly very good download speeds
+ Download manager compatible
+ Clean easy to use interface with filter and search options
+ Great looking models
+ High production values
+ 29 sites included in membership (Not all updating)
+ Approx 4000 scenes, all scenes from last 2 years available in Full HD, 12 mbit 1080P.
+ No regional pricing
+ Monthly live shows |
| Cons: |
- 1080P only available for elite members
- Not much variety in content
- First years worth of 1080P content is badly BROKEN
- Download speeds not consistent |
| Bottom Line: |
Before reading the rest of the review, answer me these questions three:
Hate fake boobs?
Hate overuse of makeup?
Hate over-produced commercial porn?
Deduct 50 from the score, move along nothing here to see.
Still reading? OK, good you will very much like this network.
After my extremely positive first look (See my comment), some cracks are starting to show. The download speeds, while generally excellent, are very erratic. As I write, I have 2 files downloading which are struggling to go above total 500 Kbps. A few days ago using the same connection, downloading 2 files from the same site I was getting total speeds of 10,000 Kbps. The speeds have been bad for the last 24 hours, looking at their forums this is a recurring problem that rears its ugly head every couple of weeks.
My second big issue is with the 1080P videos. It seems they screwed up big time with the encoding profile. What this means is that for all 1080P videos on the site from early 2009 to mid 2010 (That's a LOT of videos) you cannot play them at all in Windows Media Player and in MPC-HC you cannot seek (jump to different parts of the video). Playing them in VLC seems to work OK but the problem for me is that I watch all my grot on my big living room TV. Attached to this TV is a ultra low power HTPC, which thanks to DXVA, can normally play high bitrate 1080P videos without a problem. VLC does not support DXVA and without it my PC is not powerful enough to play them. I could fix the files but as a purist I like my videos as downloaded from the site, pure and unsullied.
Those are really my only issues with the network. The download speeds I am willing to forgive as long as it doesn't get worse. The broken videos are what knocked a good 15 points of the score, turning it from a truly excellent site to merely a great one. |
|
02-17-11 02:50am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I am the type of person that has strong opinions about everything that interests me, porn included. Therefore when I write or speak about porn, my opinions are voiced. I suppose it could come across as overthought to some but I believe that to be a good thing. Why would anyone come to this site if the reviews and comments were inane, purile and written by people with no passion for the subject matter?
|
02-08-11 01:24am
|
Reply
299
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
I am spoiled by a 100mbit connection I guess. Porn delivered at the speed of light, isnt technology wonderful :)
|
02-08-11 01:19am
|
Reply
300
|
Pack Of Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks, could you try a couple of the latest videos on anal streched, I know the zip downloads on those were broken as well.
|
02-07-11 11:57pm
|
