| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
I had a look at the model index in the members area and Sandy Sweet is not listed. Possible she is listed under a different name?
|
06-01-10 02:33am
|
Reply
302
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lone59's Comment
Cant say anything about the customer service but they do now have HD (720P MP4) downloads available.
|
05-26-10 01:09am
|
Reply
303
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
hakan's Comment
I downloaded a couple of MP4 HD files from bigtitsroundasses without any problems using DownThemAll.
Which files did you have problems with?
|
05-24-10 09:31am
|
Reply
304
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
While I cant argue with your opinion of how she looks, she is a grown woman and fully responsible for taking her boobs to this level of extremes.
|
05-01-12 12:29am
|
Comment
305
|
Beshine
(0)
|
|
04-30-12 03:49am
Replies (4)
|
Review
306
|
Beshine
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very nice technical video quality 1080P WMV @ 8Mbits / Sec.
Photos not high res at ~1000x1333 but use very little compression resulting in images ~1MB in size that look great.
71 videos sets and 90 profesional photo sets
79 diary style photo sets showing her going about her daily life shopping, at the hairdressers etc
Updates are irregular but normally 1 video plus 1 photo set a week.
Good members forum where Mayra takes an active role.
Very fast download speeds
No DRM, no download limits, no regional pricing, multiple payment processors including CCbill. |
| Cons: |
Expensive at $30 per month.
The video encoding profile used is NOT DXVA compliant meaning you will need a beefy CPU to decode the 1080P video without frame drops.
Photo sets contain on average only 50 photos.
A zip option for photo sets is available but it seems the server compresses them on demand and it takes AGES before the download even starts.
Videos are on average only 4 minutes long.
REALLY lacking in variety of the content.
Very, very, very soft-core. Topless only.
See bottom line for my own biggest problem |
| Bottom Line: |
As Beshine.com no longer really exists and my old review was based on her old site before the re-design I thought its about time I posted a updated one. If you have seen my previous reviews it should be pretty clear that I like big tits. Real or enhanced I like them both equally. I used to think "the bigger the better" with Beshine ahem Mayra Hills having the biggest around she would be the obvious choice for a huge boob connoisseur.
When I last reviewed her site back in June 2010 Mayra's tits, while absolutely massive, still looked like tits with nipples and all. In that time both herself and her site have undergone massive change, she is leaner and more toned, more professional make-up and hair and as far as her face and body are concerned looks better than ever. Also the amateurish feel to her main photo sets and video are gone and both are now of really good quality.
Then we arrive at the thorny issue of her USP. I never thought I would be saying this about a woman but her boobs are now too big. After countless more operations Mayra Hills does not look like a attractive woman to me any more, the boobs are just far, far too big, her nipples seem to have disappeared making them look like big round flesh coloured balls with little resemblance to boobs. So much so that if you were to tell me they were strap-on prosthetics I would believe you.
With the only appeal of this site being her boobs and my dislike of said boobs there is nothing left for me here. The score I have given is my most subjective yet. If you can look at those monsters and are attracted to what you see and want more then technically you will be in for a treat. The videos are plentiful and of great quality as are the photo sets, she updates regularly and is a active member of the forum. In that case the site would be worth a solid 75/100. As for me, I'm going to find who has the second largest boobs in the world and give their site a try. |
|
03-08-12 08:06am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
307
|
Beshine
(0)
|
|
03-07-12 11:47am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
308
|
Beshine
(0)
|
|
12-22-11 04:25am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
309
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I actually joined just before his review but I would not call it bad luck. Despite its faults I actually really like this site, it has a certain charm that a lot of sites dont have. Its hard to describe but some places, despite having great content, feel kind of barren, empty and souless; something I did not find here. In my review I tried to be objective which is why the score is low, I couldnt in good conscience give it a higher score when it had so many obvious faults. Those faults are slowly being improved so I will be updating the review in the future to reflect any changes.
|
06-02-10 11:19am
|
Review
310
|
Beshine
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very nice technical video quality 1080P WMV @ 8Mbits / Sec.
"Iphone" quality video 320 * 180 MP4 AVC @ ~1Mbit Sec.
50 videos with matching photo sets.
16 diary entries with photo sets.
Good members forum where Beshine takes an active role.
I love the design of the site, very elegant and intuitive. A lot of "big" sites could learn some lessons here.
No DRM, no download limits, no regional pricing, multiple payment processors including CCbill. |
| Cons: |
Expensive at $30 per month.
The video encoding profile used is NOT DXVA compliant meaning you will need a beefy CPU to decode the 1080P video without frame drops.
Photo sets contain on average only 50 photos.
Photo sets are not zipped.
Videos are on average only 3 minutes long.
Photos and video very amateur.
REALLY lacking in variety of the content.
Very, very, very soft-core. Topless only. |
| Bottom Line: |
Karasek did a good job with his review so I was in 2 minds about posting this. While I am of pretty much the same opinion as him, I believe my review adds some worthwhile details so I decided to post it.
The 2 things that really bring the score down are the variety of the content and the ability of the photographer.
80% of the videos / photosets just start with Beshine wearing a certain piece of tight clothing while pottering around outside. If it wasn't for the couple of topless shots at the end of each set I would think I was looking at someone's holiday snaps. The variety in the later updates seems to have improved a lot, hopefully it will stay that way.
Adding to the holiday snap feel, the photos are very badly framed and some of the outdoor scenes are majorly underexposed. They are better in some of the later updates, maybe the photographer/cameraman has just been on a course.
There are a lot of things to like here if you are into freakishly large tities. Even in the short time the site has been live it is possible to see the size of those boobs grow from "back breakingly large" to "so big they are visible from space". If it appeals to follow a girl on her quest to have the largest breasts in the world then it is worth joining for that alone. My 2 main issues with the content itself seems to have improved in the later updates, I think once she has found her feet this could be a must for big boob lovers.
I really don't see the content getting more hardcore, she doesn't seem to be that type of gal. As I'm usually into harder stuff my final score reflects this. If you are into soft-core, it would be fair to add 5 points to the score. |
|
06-01-10 03:44am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
311
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
Karasek's Review
More of a freak show than erotic but a good fair review.
|
05-26-10 01:04am
|
Reply
312
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
wanker28's Review
HoneyChest.com has a few HD scenes with Dominno too. A few more details about the site would be nice but good effort for a first review.
|
10-09-11 01:23am
|
Reply
313
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
John7777's Comment
I doubt it will close, most likely it will keep recycling material to milk us poor customers for every penny they can :(
But thanks for the heads up :)
|
05-17-10 02:55pm
|
Reply
314
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Wow so they really shot themselves in the bollocks twice with this, the special offer email which actually doubles the normal price and by incorporating regional pricing in their horrible site upgrade. Manwin could kill porn for me if they continue to grow and do this with the other sites they own.
|
10-02-12 02:39am
|
Reply
315
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Narrow escape if you ask me, their new user interface is unusable.
But anyway, I signed up a few days ago and paid ~350 Czech crowns for a month which is ~18 USD. The price advertised on PU is 20 bucks so if they do have regional pricing then this must be the very first time I have been on the good side of it. What GBP price do they try to charge if you follow the link from here?
|
10-01-12 02:22am
|
Comment
316
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
09-28-12 08:11am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
317
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
03-07-11 05:16am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
318
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I hold my hands up, I didn't actually think of that when I wrote the sentence. Although being British the double entendre is so deeply entrenched in our being, we use them subconsciously all the time :)
|
02-22-11 09:29am
|
Reply
319
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I remember reading article about their shady practices a while ago. It mentioned they have improved they way they do business although they are certainly not squeaky clean. The article centred on their owning and running many tube sites, which is understandably why the industry were not too fond of them. I don't recall it mentioning them screwing over customers, do you have any details about this?
|
02-22-11 09:26am
|
Reply
320
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks you for the positive encouragement. I don't have a blog or any other outlet for my ramblings, I tend to analyze and dissect movies and other media over several beers each Friday night in the pub. Alcohol fueled debate is always a interesting experience :)
|
02-18-11 02:57am
|
Review
321
|
Brazzers
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Recent 1080P videos are EXCELLENT Quality
+ Photo sets with 99% of scenes
+ Great value yearly membership
+ Zipped photo sets
+ Multiple video quality download options
+ Mostly very good download speeds
+ Download manager compatible
+ Clean easy to use interface with filter and search options
+ Great looking models
+ High production values
+ 29 sites included in membership (Not all updating)
+ Approx 4000 scenes, all scenes from last 2 years available in Full HD, 12 mbit 1080P.
+ No regional pricing
+ Monthly live shows |
| Cons: |
- 1080P only available for elite members
- Not much variety in content
- First years worth of 1080P content is badly BROKEN
- Download speeds not consistent |
| Bottom Line: |
Before reading the rest of the review, answer me these questions three:
Hate fake boobs?
Hate overuse of makeup?
Hate over-produced commercial porn?
Deduct 50 from the score, move along nothing here to see.
Still reading? OK, good you will very much like this network.
After my extremely positive first look (See my comment), some cracks are starting to show. The download speeds, while generally excellent, are very erratic. As I write, I have 2 files downloading which are struggling to go above total 500 Kbps. A few days ago using the same connection, downloading 2 files from the same site I was getting total speeds of 10,000 Kbps. The speeds have been bad for the last 24 hours, looking at their forums this is a recurring problem that rears its ugly head every couple of weeks.
My second big issue is with the 1080P videos. It seems they screwed up big time with the encoding profile. What this means is that for all 1080P videos on the site from early 2009 to mid 2010 (That's a LOT of videos) you cannot play them at all in Windows Media Player and in MPC-HC you cannot seek (jump to different parts of the video). Playing them in VLC seems to work OK but the problem for me is that I watch all my grot on my big living room TV. Attached to this TV is a ultra low power HTPC, which thanks to DXVA, can normally play high bitrate 1080P videos without a problem. VLC does not support DXVA and without it my PC is not powerful enough to play them. I could fix the files but as a purist I like my videos as downloaded from the site, pure and unsullied.
Those are really my only issues with the network. The download speeds I am willing to forgive as long as it doesn't get worse. The broken videos are what knocked a good 15 points of the score, turning it from a truly excellent site to merely a great one. |
|
02-17-11 02:50am
Replies (8)
|
Comment
322
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
01-11-11 02:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
323
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
When you are one of the owners of the company and also in charge of the IT infrastructure certain allowances can be made :)
|
09-24-10 04:50am
|
Reply
324
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
E MMM's Comment
Bad form indeed. Had a similar thing with 21sextury, logged in from work and home within the space of a few hours and they blocked my account. Instantly received a email with a new random password and could log in again. Brazzers should do the same
|
09-24-10 12:39am
|
Reply
325
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
I am spoiled by a 100mbit connection I guess. Porn delivered at the speed of light, isnt technology wonderful :)
|
02-08-11 01:19am
|
