| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I tell you this much. When it comes to photos - it is extremely important that the girl looks into the camera. I don't know how many times that a woman is on her back (missionary position) for the pose, and for some reason she has her head turned to the side.
This is very true for the ATK sites - they always make their models turn their head for so many poses.
|
11-06-11 06:49pm
|
Reply
2
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hey Denner thanks for replying, so you've seem some of what I absolutely. Would you be able to help with the following that I posted:
I need help choosing a decent site to check out. I prefer a mixture of both videos and photos - with more of a concentration on photos.
PHOTOS:
good quality without heavy editing (natural is more preferred)
fully body shots
not a huge fan of close ups - occasional close-ups are fine
not a fan of anal - keep it minimum
Ethnicity - I like variety (it's not a must, but it would nice),
age group - not real preference [(20's through mature (40's)]
size - petite through thick
Poses:
need a variety
woman lying on back with legs spread and a little spreading, etc.
VIDEOS:
a little HD. variety: some hardcore, softcore, female masturbation
option to download videos as clips is a must.
I tried ATK exotics, ATK galleria and ATK premium. I haven't tried any of the other ATK sites yet.
|
10-17-11 04:10pm
|
Comment
3
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
10-14-11 04:53pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
4
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
thanks for replying - here's one more question - i posted this in general comments as well.
I just took another look at the website again and looked at the video samples - they all seemed to be only anal videos during sex.
I believe their sites concentrate more on the anal thing - but is there enough non-anal vids and pics to satisfy those of us doesn't care for the anal stuff?
I used to like watching videos mostly - but now I like good large quality pics more. I want to start back watching videos a bit - but a site that has a combination of vids a pics would be nice. I don't care for video still shots.
thanks
|
10-14-11 03:47pm
|
Comment
5
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
10-14-11 03:39pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
6
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
10-06-11 05:34pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
7
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
schlemihl's Review
Around how many pics are in the new sets?
|
09-23-11 04:08pm
|
Comment
8
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
09-11-11 10:17pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
9
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Reply
I just joined ATK Galleria, you are right. They're images are similar. I find myself very frustrated. I got excited to view some of the larger images, just to be frustrated with the quality. The pics are not crisp, there's no fine detail. There are so many with the faces fuzzy, blurry, or out-of-focus.
What does someone have to do to find a site with good quality, crisp, natural pictures? Someone help me please, lol.
|
07-21-11 11:36pm
|
Reply
10
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
thanks
|
07-21-11 11:32pm
|
Comment
11
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
|
07-17-11 08:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
12
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
07-17-11 05:41pm (Update History)
Reason: Wanted to add more detail
|
| Pros: |
Has potential. Not much airbrushing. |
| Cons: |
Over the top photo editing. Diminished detail due to photo editing. |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest gripes are with the:
1)pic's quality 2)photographers who ruins the pics (content) with way too much editing 3)whoever directs the poses, setting, lighting, etc.
Photo editing / manipulation. So often I ran across photos that were over edited, they were edited so much that I couldn't edit them to make them look better on my computer. These photos were so much that the models hair would have no detail and would blend in with black backgrounds. There would be deep dark shadows on their skin ruining details. Too much editing takes away detail. Natural photos are wonderful.
There were plenty occasions that some of the models had unnatural colors. Such as, red or orange skin. They looked more alien that natural. Those were mainly older pics, but some of the newer ones had similar features. I think that was probably due to editing.
Poses / Setting...ect
For the most part, every model has the same expression. All they do is smile, some smile really hard. Nothing wrong with smiling – but they need to mix it up. Like: frown, smile, no expression, lick tongue out. Most importantly, try to look sexy or nasty.
The same hair style, especially on the black woman. A model will have 10 different photo shoots and will have the very same hair style on every single shoot. Example: Amber . Mix it up for crying out loud. I don't care if they wear a wig – just mix it up.
Every photo shoot should have at least one good shot with great clarity of:
1)(full body nude shot with good clarity/detail) standing or lying down
2)(boob shot) from the waist up to include the cute face of the model
3) (vagina shot) model laying down on back with legs spread open, but also with her face in view without being out-of-focus. Kind of like a missionary pose.
There were some many times that I was waiting for a good shot of a model with legs spread, but I was left dissapointed because the model would have her hand covering up her vagina on 10 pics with none of her fully exposed. It's ok to tease, but show me what I want to see somewhere in there.
Quality:
The are times that you want to see a model nude laying on her back, but on ATK they would either have the vagina in focus with the face out of focus or the other way around. Very frustrating.
Sometimes there are pics put on the site and the whole picture is out of focus or with the face blurry as if the photographer or the model was moving while pic was being taken. Why would something be put on the site like that.
The lighting in much of the photos is so bright that I cannot see any detail off the boobs. This is mainly for the white woman. A good photographer can compensate for that during the shoot.
Wide screen pics. In these days computer monitors and TVs are wide screens – not square.
If a model is sitting against the wall with her legs spread, why would you clip off the legs. The full pic would fit perfectly on a wide screen tv. Legs are nice – don't take them out of the pic.
Why are there so many pics of just one body part? So many times while I'm looking for one good pic of a model that I like, I can't find one, yet there's 10 pics of her leg, foot, or of a single tit.
Other:
There are two different sign-ins for the forums and the actual atk photo site. What gives? If I want to comment on a photo, I don't want to have to log in to a different site.
There should be a link were we can ask a question directly to the photographers or at least were we can give feedback. There should be an option to comment on a photo or photo sets while viewing it without having to go to another site.
The entire site needs a new design. I have never gone to a porn site were everything seems old. The navigation is terrible. The site seems like a forgotten site where no one cares to update it.
Every single gripe that I wrote about are wide spread throughout the website – yes every single gripe!!
I just had to write something about my experience there, because I believe the site has a lot of potential, if only they would work on these issues that I wrote about. Every single gripe that I wrote about are wide spread throughout the website – yes every single gripe!!
***Please give access to more than one ATK website with a membership, or at least offer a big discount to second website. I think membership would then go through the roof**** |
|
07-17-11 05:22pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
13
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
This might be a little different. But there are times when I stay away from an ATK sight for awhile, then I would go back in case there was anything new. But I would hesitate about which ATK sight to join because I'm afraid of being disappointed. If there was some kind of 2 sites for 1 deal, or maybe an extra 5 bucks for second site - there's a better chance that I would bite. Because most of the time I would just shy away, and I never pay for more than one site per month, I only get a membership maybe once every 3-4 months.
|
07-17-11 08:16pm
|
Reply
14
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
thanks
|
12-23-11 07:31pm
|
Comment
15
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
10-17-11 04:53pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
16
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Karups really came through and answered my concerns. Thumbs up to Jeff and Karups.
|
11-29-11 10:18pm
|
Review
17
|
Karup's PC
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site appears geared more toward photos - which is what I personally enjoy.
- This site has a huge concentration of the sexiest woman in porn that I have seen.
- There are about 3 photo updates 6 days per week.
- There's about 2 video updates 5 days per week.
- Plenty of HighRes photos. The high resolution photos are 1000x1500
- It seems like half of the site is in their higher resolution format.
- The newer photo sets have well over a hundred pics each – enough to get the shots that you want.
***Best upper body boob shots I've seen on any website.***
***My number #1 Standout is that the photo shoots has almost the perfect model poses and it seems standard in almost every photo shoot – at least with the newer shoots. I haven't found this anywhere else.***
- Site layout is great and very clean without any confusion.
- I think the overall site navigation was great with good search categories. |
| Cons: |
- The high resolution photos are 1000x1500 are pretty small for those with a larger monitors.
- The quality of the photos can be a little better.
- The older photos lower resolution photos are so small that they are useless – should bump off site.
- Way too much make-up – need more natural.
- Some bad lighting – either too dark or too bright degrading detail.
- Unnatural skin colors
- Not enough butt shots for those who like that.
- The solo masturbations vids are boring, rushed, no moans, not much looking into camera, no words.
- The hard core videos are pretty boring – a little realistic clean roughness sometimes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Potential Score: 95-100
I know there's quite a bit of personal negatives – that's because I am a critical person – however, this site is actually the most satisfying site that I have visited to date.
During my month of membership, I never got bored – that was a first. There's so much content and good content to look through that it'll keep you busy.
My biggest issue is the small photo sizes – but I hear they will be increasing the sizes very soon
When the larger photos come in, the site score should go through the roof.
For those who have smaller monitors this site is great, but if you're like me and have a larger monitor – you may be a little discouraged in the beginning. After a bit, I actually got a little use to it – but I'm looking forward to the larger images. My monitor size 26”
Boob shots: The closer-up portrait photos of the models from the belly up are perfect boob shots and they look absolutely amazing on my monitor.
The photos can use a little boost in quality especially for the landscape photos – but the quality is as good as any site.
I highly recommend this site – you won't be disappointed.
The customer service is great and they actually work with you and answer your concerns. |
|
11-29-11 09:55pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
18
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Oh thank you jeff. I will send it right away.
|
11-03-11 08:42pm
|
Comment
19
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
11-03-11 03:06pm
Replies (8)
|
Reply
20
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
So last night i made the dive into karups pc. I signed up for a membership.
Sorry guys but here's my first opinion thus far - buyer's remorse. :C
My two main disappointments are:
1) Pic sizes. Indeed the photos are 1500x1000 which are way too small. I have a 26 inch flat screen monitor.
2) Overall pic quality. Not good. If the quality was good, I can sacrifice the photo's size.
My disappointments are only based on viewing with a 26", so I may be a bit biased. That said, I think the pic sizes and quality are fine for someone using a standard laptop.
|
11-02-11 03:50pm
|
Reply
21
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Reply
thanks guys this was of great help.
|
10-31-11 03:11pm
|
Comment
22
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
10-23-11 09:12pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
23
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
First thanks all for replying to the my opinions of the website.
Now I have to gripe at all of you. At no point in my review did I say that I want the girls to be glamorized and full of makeup.
This is what I said: "In my opinion most of the woman on the site are not too attractive. 50 - 75% of the woman is a 5 out of 10. 5 being average. If you like stunning women from time to time - look else where."
Maybe my use of "stunning" made it appear as such. What I was saying that those who do like stunning females - they would be disappointed IMHO. Stunning or a 10 does not have to mean full of makeup.
I actually hate twistys and probably DDF because when I visit their sites, all of the models appear to be bathed in makeup. I hate airbrushing and all of the photo editing after-shoots. I like the natural looks by far, but I don't mind a little makeup.
Now, the women aren't ugly. But IMO most of them are only average. But they are more attractive than the women on ATK Hairy.
I love natural and prefer it over makeup. But on this site, I think they would do good to have a certain portion of them put on a little makeup - because some of them need it. That's just my opinion.
|
02-08-12 09:08pm
|
Reply
24
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Review
I do apologize if this isn't a detailed review including specs and so on. I just wanted to do a quick one.
I will also add that if you do like very good quality in the photos - ATK Hairy is much better so far. I just got a membership there only days ago. With some of the sets, I have never seen this good of quality on any site hands down. However, so far it's looking as though the volume of those super good quality ones may be a bit limited.
|
02-06-12 07:21pm
|
Review
25
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Clean layout of site.
Has a good proportion of higher resolution pics. |
| Cons: |
Hit and miss on the video quality.
No standard in terms of poses. You will not get similar poses from set to set. The thing about that is you will not get the poses that you want.
Focusing issues throughout.
There is rarely any ethnicity on the site.
Not enough models.
Not enough attractive models. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I was very disappointed with the site mainly due to the quality of the photos.
In my opinion most of the woman on the site are not too attractive. 50 - 75% of the woman is a 5 out of 10. 5 being average. If you like stunning women from time to time - look else where.
If you like a standard among poses from set to set , you will be very frustrated here. You'll be lucky to get a nice boob shot or butt shot on every set let alone the common poses. The poses are very random, because of this, you will never know what you're going to get on the daily updates - I know that some people likes this however. I was disappointed more times than not.
This is a hairy site, therefore, I thought they would be superb when it comes to seeing a clear detailed shot of the vagina. They were just good enough on the closeups. On most of the shots when zoomed out to more of a full body shot - the quality went down the toilet - and the vagina were of pretty bad detail. This was frustrating because the photos were very large, yet they were lacking in detail.
There were terrible lighting issues throughout. Some of the photo shoots were so bright that the details were burned out and blinding. Some of this may be due to photo editing. On many occasions the photo editing ruined detail, such as not being able to see detail of the woman's hair.
There were too many occasions of the hairy extreme, which included hairy legs, hairy asses, and arm pits.
If you like female masturbation videos - stay away from this site. Theses are among the most boring women masturbating that I have ever seen; the females will not utter a word; they rarely make moaning sounds; you could hear a pen drop they're so quiet; the females rarely looks into the camera nor interact; seams like they pull on or play with their pubic hair more than masturbating; the masturbation seems very fake on most videos;
The worse part of the videos is the extreme closeup shots. They stay zoomed for half to 3/4 of the videos in many cases. |
|
02-06-12 07:17pm
Replies (5)
|
