| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If it's like a vintage site, b&w is sometimes the only way to go.
|
06-02-07 10:36am
|
Reply
327
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Always, even if I subscribe for a second time.
You never know what they put into those terms. Maybe you have to model yourself at some point!
Ok, silliness aside, you still never know.
|
06-02-07 10:35am
|
Reply
328
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It's for things like these iafd.com was invented I guess.
But it can be a hassle sometimes and they can even con you with some sites. Check my TaylorBow.com review for an example.
|
06-02-07 10:32am
|
Reply
329
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Besides it being pretty hot that a girl swallows imho, it's convenient too.
No hassle of cleaning stuff up ;)
|
06-02-07 10:29am
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I have only found one good feed, which is actually a feed that can be accessed for free through another website.
So I have yet to find some good Bonus Feeds.
|
06-02-07 10:11am
|
Reply
331
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It actually depends on whether the pictures have been archived in let's say a .zip file or .rar, so you can download them.
If so then over 200. If not, 100 should be sufficient.
I'll just put 100 for now.
|
06-02-07 10:09am
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
This is a pretty good poll, might be a bit old but stil...
Anyway, DRM is something that will eventually fade away.
|
06-02-07 10:07am
|
Review
333
|
Nude In Public.tv
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
* Real public nudity
* Lots of spectators in the videos.
* Exclusive and pretty unique content.
* Date of birth mentioned with every girl.
* Decent quality pictures. (which help you make out the faces in the videos sometimes) |
| Cons: |
* Navigation on the site leaves some things to be desired
* They only talk German in the videos.
* Quality of the videos are way below par with some girls.
* Video formats vary with every girl.
* Every video is kind of the same. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nude-In-Public.tv is actually not really a bad site, but a site which has some flaws that need to be worked out.
Like the navigation on the site, which used to be just horrible.
But they seem to fixing that as it changed in the last year or so. Still it leaves some things to be desired.
Also they are uploading bigger and longer videos than before.
The content itself is all pretty much the same. All of the videos consist of girls walking around towns and cities in Germany in the buff. Nothing more, nothing less.
The quality of the videos is actually horrible at times, especially the older ones. You can hardly make out the faces sometimes.
But there are a lot of spectators and it's real. It's all been recorded in the big cities of Germany. So if you're German and you're into these sort of things, this might be a whole lot of fun.
But all in all I'd have to say that this site will most likely bore you after the third video.
Although they are changing the site a bit every now and then.
So it does have some potential.
But for now 30 bucks a month just seems a bit steep for this content. Also there is no trial-account. |
|
06-02-07 09:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
334
|
Taylor Bow
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
* The site does not get updated so you only need to subscribe one time.
* The videos are fully downloadable
* Very hot girl that plays Taylor Bow
* Funny storyline about the site being a payback site for his ex-girlfriend.
*Videos from "boyfriend's" P.O.V (Point Of View) |
| Cons: |
* The trial account does not give you access to the entire site.
* The girl is actually a real amateur porn star.
* Some links on the site to some videos don't work.
* Site does not get new content. (this is a pro and a con)
* They lie about the average length of the videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
Sure the Taylor Bow website which is about Taylor Bow (aka Riley Ryder) isn't really a website to get back at a real ex-girlfriend, but some might like to think so. Especially the owners of the website.
However, in my opinion they shouldn't have used a real amateur porn star, this just takes away the effect of the storyline behind it.
The videos are decent quality, about average but not the 15 to 30 minutes they promise.
Sure some are but a bunch of them are about 6 to 10 minutes long.
The shots in the videos are good too, it's mainly P.O.V. You see it from the "boyfriend's" point of view.
About the site itself: they don't update it, which is a pro and a con.
You only need to subscribe once and unsubscribe once, be sure to take the full access account because the trial account doesn't get you squat.
But even if you do get a full account, chances are you don't get all of the content they promise as the site has some dead links. I found 2 at the time. The videos are there but the links are just incorrect.
But all in all, I'd say if you feel attracted to Taylor Bow/Riley Ryder in any way, this is a pretty good deal.
What you see if what you get... sort of.
And on a personal note: I thought the videos were pretty cute because she does give off that girlfriend vibe. I had fun with it. |
|
06-01-07 08:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
335
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I too agree on the MetArt comment. Although on a personal level I prefer FTV Girls.
This solely on based on the "weirdness-factor".
It's a high quality "normal" porn site, but with an edge.
VideoBox is too mainstream in my opinion, these videos are available in any good online videostore. Granted not all of them, but a good bunch of videos.
And Matts Models doesn't cut it for me because the quality, compared to the others listed here, is below par.
Not that's it's no good, because personally I like the content but that aside of course.
And Abby Winters has a variety of confusing subscription plans. I know if you read the fine print it's all explained, but I like my porn like my bed. Comfortable and easy to get in and out of.
Yes I know I could've used a more clever word instead of bed, but that was just too obvious.
|
06-01-07 07:24pm
|
