| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
101
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
|
09-29-09 10:14pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
102
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
ace of aces,
By "not heavy" I mean it is not as fixated on masturbation as most sites nowadays. There is plenty of it, but even when there is it comes after a decent length of time.
Some of the vids are in one part, some in segments. I'd say slightly less than half are available as a single file.
Yes, actual content appears exclusive, but many of the models are found elsewhere.
|
09-25-09 11:27am
|
Review
103
|
Boob Study
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Naturally-busty models, including some stunners
- Lots of content up
- Zipfiles for pics
- Zipped pics up to 1200x1800
- No navigation issues
- Good, clear video (640x480, 2000-3000 bitrate), though not HD
- Not heavy on toys or masturbation (con for most, probably) |
| Cons: |
- Pics in browser are smaller versions than the ones in the zipfiles
- Many vids in small chunks rather than single files
- Needs more variety of action in solo vids: too many long periods with model doing nothing but playing with her breasts.
- Someone has a tooth-brushing fetish, which is a tad strange. Many models shown brushing teeth. |
| Bottom Line: |
All in all, this is one of my favorite boob sites, and I've tried a great many of them. Most of the solo vids are silent, meaning no music and precious little blather. Some find this a con, but it's a major plus for me. I also have to say that this site features some of the sexiest women in this genre, like April O'Neil, Holly Webster, Petra, and the amazing Alina. Not to mention Arika, who might not have a beautiful face but is sheer perfection from the neck down.
There is not a great deal of HC here, but there is some. All I took was solo content. Still, I ended up with 27 gigs of video and 10 gigs of zipfiles. There is a good deal of variance in pic size, going from smallish to 1200x1800. Most of the sets I've extracted look very nice.
I would venture to say that most guys would find this site too tame, and maybe a tad silly. There is a monotony in what the models are actually doing in the vids: lots of tooth-brushing, showering, and continuous auto-booby-squeezing. For sites like this to be more interesting to the average perv as far as solo content, we need to think of getting the models to engage in a wider variety of activities. I love to watch beautiful women do mundane things so this actually isn't a huge problem for me.
I will probably join again in about six to nine months to get the updates. |
|
09-24-09 10:00pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
104
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
I think Wifey is the most truly erotic woman on the net. If I had a wife like her I'd be one happy Willy.
|
09-24-09 09:16pm
|
Reply
105
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah, it was Epoch. Site replied to my query with automated response. Real response should be in a few days.
Another lovely thing: On their contact page, you get a form-email to fill out, and then you have to answer the question in the box to prove you're human. So far so good. The question was "58 - 7 = ?" I entered 51, and was told this was the "wrong capture, please go back".
Had to finally re-open the page, re-type email, and answer the new question. This was "93 + 8 = ?" This time my amazing mathematical skills were successful!
Oh, and by the way, the naughty bits (vag, at least) are blurred out even in the pictures here, at least with the older sets, which is thus far all I've looked at. I thought this was only with the videos.
|
09-24-09 04:31am
|
Comment
106
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
|
09-24-09 02:57am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
107
|
Public GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
After a look at the welcome page, it looks like a collection of stuff you could probably find for free at numerous adult pic-hosting sites. I've always been tempted to try a site like this, but have never done it.
|
09-13-09 10:11pm
|
Reply
108
|
Naughty Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Hi Capn,
Thanks for the trust vote and for all the replies. Now, if I can answer your question:
It has been a long while since I've been to the site, and I should stress that I NEVER download hardcore picture sets. They bore me to tears. I've taken a few b/g stills featuring a model I like, or if the pic in interesting in other ways, but I've never downloaded a complete set. So, when I look at what I collected from Naughty Mag, all I have are solo-model sets and a handful of videos. The vids were all yawnfests, except for a scant few. The solo sets were very good, as far as I'm concerned, because they were well-edited, didn't use dozens of shots with no noticeable change in pose, and because they featured undies which I like: more towards full-cut, full-back as opposed to thongs and "sexy" stuff. Mind you, I am an archive-miner, as I like the way they did things back in the late ninetees, early oughts. I can't comment on newer sets since I didn't focus much on them. I would imagine they have caught up with the modern trends just like ATK and the like.
If memory serves, there was the usual amount of toy/masturbation stuff, as well as lots of hardcore, but I honestly cannot say what the ratio would be between hard and soft. Sorry. It's been too long and I was there for the archives.
|
09-12-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
109
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
Hi Capn,
In regard to not commenting on videos: I see your point, since you don't care for video, but there is a way to be simple and totally objective about commenting on it. For instance, download a few, and get some basic stats, for instance:
"Vids are mostly 640x480, bitrates averaging about 2000k." This doesn't pass any real judgment on them and you don't have to look at them at all, and the information can be helpful to people who are considering a subscription. You might also touch on other points, as in, do they contain a music track, does the videographer yakkety-yak his way through the vid, or perhaps he believes he is the Fellini of porn and films everything while standing on his head...
Even if this info has been passed on by other reviewers, it still improves your own review and makes it more complete. I'm more of a pic guy myself, so I understand where you're coming from.
I didn't read through the whole exchange so apologies if someone has already said all of this.
|
09-11-09 08:47pm
|
Comment
110
|
Polish Big Boobs
(0)
|
|
08-11-09 02:13am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
111
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review
Good review, but a few things to note:
1) I saw plenty of vids with higher rez than 852x480. Look in some of the newest vids.
2) I got access to only one bonus site. It seems you get access to the others only after you've been a member for a set period. Maybe it was different for you.
I ended up keeping a gazillion zips since I love skinny girls and this site offers them up in spades, and this is only the softcore stuff, since I don't watch HC. All in all I enjoyed my month and would recommend this site to just about anyone. But yes, the site was very sluggish and navigation is sometimes awful.
|
07-28-09 03:44pm
|
Reply
112
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
This may be a bit late, but:
I never noticed the DL limit. I would have mentioned it, had I been aware of it.
|
07-03-09 12:42am
|
Comment
113
|
Real Teen Latinas
(0)
|
|
07-02-09 11:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
114
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
That's truly a shame. I was planning on going back to Nubiles soon. I am so sick of the masturbation/dildo stuff, in fact it's one of the reasons I stayed away from PU for a while: I feel so out of the loop. For some reason, watching a girl masturbate does nothing for me. I know this is not the norm, but what can I say? It bores the shit out of me.
|
07-02-09 11:11pm
|
Reply
115
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Sorry you were disappointed, Mes. I feel guilty because I gushed over the site in reply to a comment of yours here.
I agree with most of what you say, although I find myself enjoying some of the pictures here more than those at any other site I've joined thus far. Why that is I can't exactly say. There are things going on at a subconscious level that we aren't quite aware of and maybe don't understand. It could just be that I love the all-fours shots, and this site gives you every conceivable angle of that view, as if you are actually there behind the model.
That being said, yes, a site like this, which is 99 percent photo-driven, absolutely needs zipfiles. Especially when the photo sets contain numerous pictures from the exact same perspective. The man behind the site needs to do a LOT more editing of sets, and he needs to get more creative. The sets are repetitive, as you said, and could be cropped by seventy percent in a lot of cases. Furthermore, the pics are not named uniquely, and saving them becomes even more of a chore.
As far as navigation goes, yes, it needs a lot of work.
I am, by turns, very pleased and very displeased with my experiences here thus far. I was wowed at first, but that feeling has waned, except for the moments when something really resonates with me.
Sorry again.
|
01-23-09 12:31am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Sex without context is just bumping uglies. Or, like a friend of mine used to say, two brillo pads fighting over a hot dog.
|
01-21-09 10:41pm
|
Reply
117
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi ace of aces,
Can't answer that I'm afraid, since I was never a member at One By Day.
|
01-20-09 01:42pm
|
Reply
118
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Hi Monahan,
Thanks for the trust vote, by the way. To answer your questions:
1. The site tends towards the real much more than silicone enhancement, although I do recall a few phonies in the mix. I can't stand fake breasts either. That being said, this is anything but an "all natural, girl-next-door" kind of site. The models are high-end all the way, are heavily made-up, and dressed to kill. Or undressed to kill.
2. Yes, the price is high, and yes, I do think it's worth the money, considering all the dough I've wasted on sites that have crappy content and no user-friendly features. which caused me to waste time as well as money. It all depends on your tastes. Normally, glamour and polish isn't my cup of tea, but I still enjoyed the site. There's a lot of hardcore here as well. I don't even look at that and yet I found the site worthwhile.
I wouldn't do the three months myself, because the site isn't huge.
3. No network, and I don't recall any bonus sites.
|
01-20-09 01:40pm
|
Review
119
|
DDF Busty
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Top-notch videos in multiple DL options.
- Top-notch pics in variety of sizes.
- Zips for all pic sets.
- Beautiful, professional models.
- Picture sets are well-edited, not fifty shots of same pose.
- Vids can be sampled in streaming format, with two quality options.
- Model index. |
| Cons: |
- Navigation is a bit odd. You can't get to video content without seeing at least the first page of the accompanying picture set.
- Pics are hyper-glamorous, with models in full make-up, and pics seem touched-up. This could be a pro for some.
- Not a huge amount of content for the price.
- Older pics are smallish.
- Some vids contain cheesy music.
- Set backgrounds are often unappealing, with some highly questionable "art" on the walls. |
| Bottom Line: |
A lot of websites could stand to learn a great deal about customer service by perusing the DDF site. User-friendly features abound, such as pics and vids in a variety of formats, and streaming video for sampling the video prior to download. The streaming feature alone can potentially save on tons of frustration, boredom, wasted time, and wasted disk space.
I haven't seen a site with more video options. Various levels of quality in WMV, DivX, and Quicktime, plus low quality mpeg for slow connections. I opted for the 2026k, 852x480 WMV, since I can't view a bigger size, but this was very satisfactory.
The picture sets are very well-done, well-edited, and come in two to three sizes, and all zipped. My tastes do not tend toward the glamorous, and I actually prefer amateur models, but objectively speaking you would find it hard to beat this site for what it offers.
A site like this, which is willing to put in the extra work in order to make things more convenient for paying customers, makes me wonder how some of the truly lame competition can survive for very long.
I highly recommend this site, particularly for those who have a bent for busty models, but even for those who don't. |
|
01-19-09 02:23pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I voted yes. Like one famous photographer said (it was Hegre, I think), and I'm paraphrasing very loosely: admiring beautiful nude women lifts the spirit. I heartily agree, even when it fails to lift anything else.
|
01-18-09 08:37pm
|
Reply
121
|
LV Panty
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Messmer,
Go to the site and click the "join" link. On the bottom left is the webmaster's email address. I'd post it here but I don't know if that's allowed.
Like I told you before, my memory is shot and it's been over a year since I was a member, and I don't remember if the sets were zipped. I do know that I don't have any saved. My bet is you'll get a prompt response.
|
01-17-09 07:45pm
|
Reply
122
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Just had a look at LV Panty's preview. Looks like he is branching out a bit and featuring more modern, skimpy-type undies. My memory of the models was a bit fuzzy as well. They are indeed beautiful, but there are plenty of girl-next-door types we well.
|
01-16-09 09:54am
|
Reply
123
|
Nadine Jansen
(0)
|
Reply of
xyzzy's Review
Good review xyzzy, thanks. I've been tempted many times to join.
|
01-16-09 09:45am
|
Reply
124
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hi Mes,
A few things:
First, there are quite a few more models over the age of thirty at True Amateur Models than I originally thought. The guy behind the site doesn't seem to care about age. One model is in her fiftees. He doesn't care much about looks, either. I did notice some portrait style pics in older sets, but far and away his preference is landscape. As I said, the four full sets I took so far are landscape in their entirety: no portrait shots at all.
About LVPanty: I'm glad you're thinking of joining. It's been a while since I was there, but picture-wise it is second to none in the panty-genre, if you take in all factors such as fidelity to niche, pic size, and quality. **I don't recall if the sets at LVPanty are zipped**. You might want to contact the webmaster about that. I don't remember zips there, and I have none on file. My memory is shot, however. The video section is nothing to rave about either.
Also, bear in mind LVPanty is old-school. Full-sized, and predominantly full-backed, undies are the order of the day. There is not a fixation on cotton, which I know you don't like, but there is quite a bit; but even so there is nothing teeny-bopperish whatsoever. The variety of fabrics and styles is wide. The models are beautiful. It's not an amateur site. I believe you can see a few sample pics on the preview. I know you're cautious about which sites to join and I'd hate for you to think you blew your money.
A blend of LVPanty and True Amateur Models, with a vid section on par with Panty Amateur, would be a perfect site for me and I'd stay with it permanently!
|
01-16-09 09:36am
|
Reply
125
|
Asian Spreads
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks, didn't know that.
|
01-15-09 10:14pm
|
|
