| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Randyman's Poll
It varies, but I'd say it averages 1-3 hours. Often more. Sometimes less. Kudos to anyone who votes 12+ hours!
|
07-20-13 03:57am
|
Reply
202
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Lutece's Comment
Although Khan says 'cancel after a month', you can normally cancel at any time, even on the same day you join. Most (ie, every site I've been a member of) will allow you access for the remainder of your month.
|
07-18-13 01:08pm
|
Reply
203
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
Christ on a bike, that's a woeful policy.
Surely the best way of getting people to return to a site is to keep them engaged, keep them on the site and maintain their excitement. I'd never join a site with such a unrealistic download cap, let alone one that actually LIES on the preview pages like that.
|
07-17-13 11:21pm
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think we're quite different to be honest as I don't understand why I 'must' want more than non-nude. I think Ella, Sandra and Virginia were a lot more exciting, sensual and sexual than a lot of nude models I follow.
|
07-16-13 03:06pm
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I've been a member of Fame Girls several times before. With regards to NN being 'pointless', I find the art of tease can be extremely exciting if done well. More so than a lot of sites where they're showing everything.
|
07-16-13 11:18am
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm not sure if it was THE first site, but it's definitely the one I remember as being one of the first.
Mine was Anna Angel, which was by far the best amateur solo site I knew of at the time. I was a fan before she even went topless. Unfortunately updates became more sporadic, then nothing was downloadable, then she went AWOL so updates virtually stopped.
She has her new site now (Ann Angel XXX), but that is just as bad, just for different reasons.
|
07-14-13 01:45am
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Love yours, RagingBuddhist
|
07-13-13 01:00am
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
This is my current wallpaper: http://i.imgbox.com/abxAxfqN.jpg
It's Jessica Ennis, a British athlete, so I voted 'a pretty clothed woman'
She's bit of an idol - she looks absolutely great IMHO, but she's also such a great role model and a great athlete.
If I could have something more porn-related it'd probably be one of the Fame Girls - probably Ella, and if not, Katie.
|
07-12-13 02:33pm
|
Reply
209
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Reply
Is that when you're trying to log in, or is it the website in general? If you try and visit their preview area, for example, does that work? If not, maybe try and reboot your router. But if it's just the member's area, then thanks for the heads-up.
|
07-06-13 11:58pm
|
Reply
210
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Online only - never bought porn DVDs :)
|
07-05-13 09:38am
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'd say video updates, followed by model updates.
What I did with Throated was to go through the videos, and if I liked the performer, would then go and seek more from her.
|
07-02-13 12:48am
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
PU review, by far. The TBP reviews are helpful for some technical details, but the way members' areas change, they're often out-of-date as soon as they're added.
|
06-30-13 01:47am
|
Reply
213
|
Throated
(0)
|
Reply of
HardXJ's Reply
Thanks - have just sent email via PU.
|
06-27-13 08:05am
|
Comment
214
|
Throated
(0)
|
|
06-26-13 11:33pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
215
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Comment
Well said, and good for you on calling them out on this.
I completely agree. I'm not really a fan of degrading trash talk in porn at the best of times, but at least that's a 'performance', but allowing such personal and negative comments from members is a pretty sad state of affairs.
I would hope that working in the industry hardens models against stuff like this, but likewise, their confidence could be rock-bottom so these comments cross the line in my opinion.
|
06-26-13 10:22pm
|
Reply
216
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Thanks for clarifying that. I hope you take our comments on board about pre-checked cross sells though :)
|
06-26-13 11:17am
|
Reply
217
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
madgreedy's Comment
Good to know. I never really have much to say about the pre-ticked cross-sell issue, but I can't deny it is taking advantage of customers, and the whole two-day cancellation issue is just salt in the wound, and another reason I don't trust trials.
The whole porn site industry does leave me jaded sometimes. A lot of things seem weighted against the customer, whether it's heavy-handed anti-piracy measures or trying to trick customers into spending money that they might not have.
|
06-25-13 10:26pm
|
Reply
218
|
Throated
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Thank you - very useful, and glad to hear they have a lot of different options. It moves yet higher up my to-do list :)
|
06-24-13 10:52am
|
Reply
219
|
Throated
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Brilliant, thank you - Evil Angel is VERY high up on my to-do list. The only thing that has put me off in the past are file sizes as I've never been sure if you can download lower-quality versions as my favourite file-size is around 500mb as HDD space is kind of at a premium until I get a new drive.
|
06-23-13 11:16pm
|
Reply
220
|
Arab Uncovered
(0)
|
Reply of
SFguy's Comment
Thanks for the heads-up. I've not seen the site, and the preview gives no indication of quality from what I can see, so I appreciate the thoughts because otherwise I could have made the same mistake as you.
|
06-22-13 01:41pm
|
Reply
221
|
Throated
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Good to know. My opinion has softened a bit since I wrote the comment, and I've found a few great girls on there (loving Riley Reid), but the network only has three videos of her so although I'm sure I can find more of her elsewhere online, it's a shame Throated spread themselves a bit thinly in this respect. I will have a look for the JD thread later :)
|
06-22-13 12:51pm
|
Reply
222
|
BB Films
(0)
|
Reply of
ezolak's Comment
Good to know. It does seem a very awkward business model, and considering people like to be spontaneous with porn when they're in the mood, it really doesn't make much sense to me.
|
06-22-13 04:13am
|
Comment
223
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
|
06-20-13 11:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
224
|
Monsters Of Jizz
(0)
|
Reply of
bkreidercrhl's Review
Thanks for the review. Although quite brief you seem to have touched on most points. I'm not keen on the whole fire hose cumshot style as it's so unrealistic.
Looking at the preview page it's almost like the guy cumming *is* the fetish rather than decent interaction with the girls - there's pics on the preview of the girl holding the guy's dick and a fountain of cum, for example.
|
06-19-13 11:07pm
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
1 Western Digital one, which has turned into a brick. Worst thing I have ever bought.
|
06-18-13 11:46am
|
