Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Action JAV
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I signed up to be a reviewer, however the new videos get reviewed very quickly so I figured it really wasn't worth even trying. Unless you want to try to be online the moment the updates arrive, but you do have to watch them. I don't even read the reviews, they're all the same, just describing sex.
I've been a member here all year and I haven't even scratched the surface with all the material they have. They also have a lot of scans for certain models.
|
07-29-08 06:31pm
|
Review
227
|
Action JAV
(0)
96.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Huge Library Of Video---NO DRM
- All The JAV Stars Available Here
- Very Good Download Speed
- Varied Search Options
- Decent Collection Of Photos For A Vid Site |
Cons: |
- Restrictive Duo Membership
- Older Vids Are Lower Quality
- Download Limit For avi Vids Very Stingy |
Bottom Line: |
This is a difficult site to review, due to the duo membership fees which I will explain in a bit. If you are a JAV collector, this site is an absolute goldmine. I think it's been online since 2001, and as of this review, has 7564 videos of 1865 JAV idols. And it updates daily. I see here videos I have not seen elsewhere, and some of the top idols have dozens of videos in their pages. Most of the JAV girls have photos available also, but this is mainly a video site. I have been downloading like crazy, but haven't even scratched the surface. They have a good search engine, which will search by actress, movie, series, ratings and more. Here comes the strange part: There are 2 membership options, that are separate. The VIP option allows you to download all the videos in rm and the higher res rmvb formats. The rms are 225kb/s, not as bad as you would think--these are only the older vids. The rmvb are 700kb/s. Some people won't like Real at all, I don't mind it for building a library. The Digital Xpress membership is for the divx format. However, it has a D/L limit of 15GB A MONTH. VIP is 12GB a day, I haven't been able to reach that. No limit on streaming. What to make of this? You DL till the cows come home with VIP, but may not like the format. 15GB/month for Hi Q vid is pretty stingy IMO. JSEX is 8GB/day. But the vid library here is awesome. So you see my problem. My score would be in the 97/98 range if it weren't for this duo membership. You have to decide for yourself. |
|
02-22-08 09:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
228
|
Adam Cruise
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I think it may be a case of running out of new sites to review. Sometimes I wonder where they find some of these sites.
|
01-03-08 01:35pm
|
Reply
229
|
Adult Friend Finder
(0)
|
Reply of
m341ehw's Review
Thanks for the review. I consider this the number one scam site on all the internet. And I can not stand seeing their spam which seems to pop up almost everywhere.
|
02-01-08 05:37pm
|
Reply
230
|
Adult Friend Finder
(0)
|
Reply of
PowerGlide's Review
Reading all your negatives and bottom line it seems that you gave this site too high a score.
|
12-06-07 01:37pm
|
Reply
231
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Comment
Thanks for the update.
|
07-30-07 03:45am
|
Reply
232
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks, I'll probably make my way over there.
|
10-26-07 07:38pm
|
Review
233
|
ALS Scan
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Super Hi-Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Hi-Def Video
- Ton Of Material
- Very Attractive Models
- Great Photography
- Frequent Updates |
Cons: |
- Site Design Could Be Better
- Too Many Implements Of Gynecology! |
Bottom Line: |
Being primarily a photo collector, I must say this may be the best photo site I've ever seen, both technically and artistically. The first thing that struck me about the photography is that it is well composed. It's not just some guy clicking a camera. The very attractive and young models are professionally posed, and the photographer even uses signature poses that are unique to him, such as having the girl bite her lower lip. Very erotic, you see it in almost every set. And there are not endless body part closeups-in fact there are very few of them. What a relief! I know how girls are different from me, I'm interested in the particular model. However, there is an emphasis on the use of gynecological tools that (for me) is a major turnoff. For those who like this, ALS is your nirvana. The photos are crystal clear huge hi-res (3295px!)very collectible. There is a long page of videos, available in Hi-Def (1280x720)mp4 and(852x480)divx. Even their standard size is large (720x540)wmv, (640 x 480)divx. No hardcore, but plenty of solo, g/g, and the implements! To be honest, I am still trying to figure out exactly how they order the photo sets. Each model has a page with her sets. The sets contain photos that are not released in the exact order the photos were shot. Eventually, all the photos appear. Forgive me for not better explaining this. I think the site overall needs a more modern design. The frames must be removed for back clicking. But, what a great site. With daily updates. |
|
10-24-07 08:37pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
234
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Review
If you think it's "creepy" there, you should read my "Little Lupe" review! the guys on that site look like sex offenders!
|
09-10-07 10:18pm
|
Reply
235
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
The reason it's all micro closeup is to hide tha fact that the male in these scenes has a tiny dick! Guys like him should only be cleaning up the set after a porn shoot, and not be in it!
|
02-27-09 06:20pm
|
Comment
236
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
|
02-27-09 06:17pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
237
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Reg Berkeley's Reply
It's true, I avoid the mega size downloads.
I've seen H.264 at another site, and I like it.
|
10-13-09 08:18am
|
Reply
238
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Reg Berkeley's Reply
He's right, 640 x 480 is the proper ratio.
|
01-15-09 05:03am
|
Reply
239
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
You're right, I took the search engine for a spin and it works great!
|
11-29-08 06:29pm
|
Reply
240
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
The models, actresses and other persons that appear in any visual depiction appearing or otherwise contained in this Website (AmourAngels.com) were over the age of eighteen (18) years at the time of the creation of such. AmourAngels hereby certifies that this website, and all graphic images associated therewith, is exempt from both the recordkeeping and labeling requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 2257, because no images of "actual sexually explicit conduct" are contained within. All images were recorded prior to the effective date of the amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 2257, pursuant to HR 4472. All photographers / producers are required to submit proper documents of the model, stating that her age is over 18, when submitting photos, and movies to AmourAngels.com.
|
01-02-09 06:45pm
|
Reply
241
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I see you got a mail also after you joined? They should have done it first, then sent the mail!
|
11-26-07 08:43pm
|
Reply
242
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Now I read "21 videos"...it's the world of porn!
|
11-21-07 11:09am
|
Reply
243
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I will say that I received the email a few days after my membership expired. They have doubled their videos drom 17 to 35 it seems, but the letter made it seem like an avalanche of videos was coming because of customer demand.
|
11-21-07 11:07am
|
Reply
244
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
This question has been asked here many times. Some people want that "camera in the bedroom" video. I personally think porn is better with no microphone, like a silent movie. That's just my opinion.
|
11-14-07 08:21am
|
Reply
245
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
silver's Reply
Thanks. It is a good review.
|
11-13-07 08:56am
|
Reply
246
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
There were 16 videos last month. I may have to change my trust score if this wasn't a typo.
|
11-12-07 07:04pm
|
Reply
247
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
hmmm. well, that's double what they had last month anyway.
|
11-12-07 07:01pm
|
Reply
248
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
According to the new reviewer here, they just added 300 videos---right after my membership expired !!!
|
11-12-07 06:51am
|
Reply
249
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
silver's Review
They have added the videos already?
|
11-12-07 06:49am
|
Reply
250
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
The newsletter says "very soon", and promises the videos to be "more interesting". My membership expired, so i can not report att his time. Maybe I'll in a couple of months again, or someone else can report !
|
11-11-07 07:43am
|